Added: 4 years ago
From: bobbbennett
Views: 77,000
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (775)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I saw with my own eyes the hole in the pentagon. Put it this way if you stood the pentagon on its side that plane would have sheered the most fortified concrete structure in the world IN HALF ! Is it possible for a Jumbo jet to cut through the worlds strongest structure ? If so we should think about designing new building materials because I thought the Pentagon would have been alittle sturdier than a Jumbo jet. I was wrong !

  • @maxfischer36..."I thought the Pentagon would have been alittle sturdier than a Jumbo jet. I was wrong !".

    ---

    Only half wrong. The aircraft (essentially 13 foot Dia. tube) disintegrated upon impact & in the process the landing gear & trailing portions of the fuselage (luggage, freight, seats) opened up a hole allowing the plane to pass into the building.

    The wings filled with jet fuel exploded upon impact (marks on wall) raining confetti all over the lawn & nearby cars sitting in traffic.

  • i'm not saying i have proof or that a Boeing 747 is the actual plane that hit both towers or the Pentagon or crash into the field in PA, but what i do know is that all large airliners are powered by a turbofan-type powerplant while smaller are either a turbojet (with/out an afterburner section) or a tuboprop (propeller powered)... i've been in the Corps for 9 years and the 5 1/2 years, studied and certified for a year on the governments dime, the ins' and outs' of a multi-million dollar plane

  • who ever made this vid is an idiot... i worked on F/A-18s' for 5 1/2 years and of course the debris in 1:17 is not going to match any part of the engine in 1:22... you fail to understand that a Boeing 747 engine is a TurboFAN meaning it has anywhere from 3-5 stages of giant fans that power the smaller compressor stages inside, what 1:17 is showing is a small portion of the compressor stage... invest your time building a model plane for $19.99+tax at Walmart and actually learn what took me a year

  • I evened it up. Now it is 85 likes to 85 dislikes. There is one video on YouTube with almost 7,000 likes and dislikes on each side. It had 4,125 when I found it on Thanksgiving.

  • @BoardFlipper5150 Plenty of pics that they deem Ok. you mean? No, I don't want to see all their cameras. Just the one that shows a plane approaching and hitting the Pentagon. Believe me it aggravates me to no end when videos are posted by the conspiracy guys that are nothing more than speculation. It makes them look foolish. I'm interested in the NIST 360 on WTC7 destruction, and why they are trying to shut down Dimitri Khalezov's book.

  • @BoardFlipper5150 Your right only 4 layers. Actually I knew that, thanks for downplaying the fact that it was ONLY 4 layers. 4 layers of concrete and lots of steel. Why the hell are we even spending all that money on bunker busters and all these other high tech explosives when we could just use good ole fashion jet airliners as weapons. Shit, they penetrate everything.

  • @BoardFlipper5150 Your right, so why don't they show us the pictures of the rest of the wreckage. It penetrated six layers of the Pentagon, so obviously it was intact enough to traverse that deep into the structure. One horrible video released of this event. Cameras and video were confiscated, including the one from the Citgo station across from Pentagon. None of them released or returned to the owners. How many cameras on the Pentagon grounds? Only one video released, c'mon

  • Are you a plane expert? how do you know thats the engine of the "PLANE"

  • Comment removed

  • @idolhands50..."Shut up the conspiracy guys and provide some substantial proof."...

    -----

    Well you can start with the fact that there are Hundreds of witnesses to be found.

    200+ of them WITH NAMES can be found here on one of the conspiracy sites.

    Google: "9/11 and the Pentagon Attack What Witnesses Described"

    “I just watched it hit the building. It exploded”…. Boger, Sean

    " I saw an American Airlines jet come overhead and "slam into the Pentagon"... Thompson, Phillip

  • @marksman500 People can be threatened or manipulated. I would say show us more videos of this event from the Pentagon, but it's to late. They should have been released when this happened. They confiscate cameras and video from people and the Citgo station across from the Pentagon. Why? Did they need to look at their videos to figure out what hit the Pentagon? Shouldn't they know already?

  • @idolhands50.."People can be threatened or manipulated"

    --

    Ok, do you have ANY evidence or proof that hundreds of witnesses were either “threatened or manipulated? Or are you just making shit up?

    So according to YOU hundreds of witnesses are willing to lie for the Govt. after they just killed thousands of their co-workers, friends and loved ones in the Pentagon & WTC’S?..Really?..Evidence please

    So 10 years later and has ANYONE EVER come forward to report being “threatened or manipulated"?

  • @marksman500 I have the same amount of proof you have from eyewitness reports. They're were people who said they weren't sure and some that said it wasn't a plane. I guess their opinions shouldn't count? I don't care what any of them thought they saw. We're not morbid, we don't want to see bodies or add to the heartache of the victims families. Should have showed the engines. Easy enough. 9 FT. long titanium steel. Definitely not destroyed. Government made this mess.

  • @idolhands50..."I have the same amount of proof you have from eyewitness reports.some that said it wasn't a plane"

    ----

    Actually you cant have a witness (a witness being someone who "saw the plane") not see the plane, so there are 0 witnesses, unless you have some that actually saw something else fly over & crash?

    2-3 witnesses 2 miles away said it looked like a private jet, theres nothing else

    200+ witnesses saw the plane

    Google: 9/11 and the Pentagon Attack What Witnesses Described

  • @idolhands50..."9 FT. long titanium steel. Definitely not destroyed"..

    ----

    That comment is part of the problem keeping the conspiracy alive.

    There is not any "9 FT. long titanium"

    The 1/8 thick aluminum "engine housing" is 9 FT. long.

    The titanium you are refering to are the thin Turbine Fins.

    You should lay off those CT sites and listen to me!...lol..

    I have studied 911 for 6-7 years and there is alot of mis-information out there.

  • @idolhands50.."I would say show us more videos of this event from the Pentagon"..

    ---

    So you are willing to believe a video presented by the Govt. that could "easily" be faked, but not the actual physical evidence such as plane debris and hundreds of witnesses that were actually there?

  • @idolhands50..."They confiscate cameras and video from people and the Citgo station across from the Pentagon. Why?"..

    -----

    Because this was a Criminal Investigation!

    What would you have expected them to do, just left them there? Of corse they are going to take them, but not necessarily to confirm what hit but to see if there was any suspicious activity or anything of importance.

    So tell me, why would the FBI not take them?

  • @marksman500 Your right it most certainly was a criminal investigation. So, who are the U.S. government that they can take property then never return it. The guy at the Citgo station never got a chance to even view what was on the video. You know that the NIST has changed their tune about the collapse of WTC7? They now say it does meet the criteria to be classified as a building in free fall? oops! they miscalculated( Their bad) They're working on some new calculations now. Cant' wait 4 this.

  • @idolhands50...So, who are the U.S. government that they can take property then never return it."...

    -----

    The Govt. can and will hold on to property as long as there is an on-going investagation in the matter.

    The 911 investgation is still open.

  • @marksman500 Do you remember the 9/11 commission report? That meant this was their decision on the whole matter. That usually means case closed, unless people keep asking questions about it. The more prominent they are, the more the chance of it being reviewed. The cries of conspiracy could have been squelched at the time this happened. They fed into this whole conspiracy atmosphere with the fact they couldn't show any conclusive proof. Releasing 1 crap video of it.

  • @idolhands50.. Do you remember the 9/11 commission report? That meant this was their decision on the whole matter.

    The cries of conspiracy could have been squelched at the time this happened.

    ------

    The 911 report connected the dots & explained how it went down by using Money trails, Wire taps, Surveillance & People who openly admit involvement.

    Many people have been captured & prosecuted in at least 4 courts of law in 4 different countries for helping the hijackers.

    The CT’s still squelched..

  • They fed into this whole conspiracy atmosphere with the fact they couldn't show any conclusive proof. Releasing 1 crap video of it.

    ----

    Exactly, if the Govt. had this pre planned (planting plane parts on the lawn, 5 fallen light poles etc..) you would have expected them to shove one of their pre made fake videos in our face the next day or at least within 10 years later Right?

    Instead, they are taking heat for showing a 5 frame crappy vid?

    The Govt. could produce one tomorrow if they wanted.

  • @marksman500 It is ridiculous to think that they could not produce a more conclusive video at the time this event took place. And like I said, it's too late now. So they have to deal with the flack on it,especially in light of the controversy around the WTC buildings strange collapses. With WTC7 in the forefront of this debacle. Personally, my suspicions lay with the buildings collapse, not with the planes. But I understand the suspicions with the Pentagon.

  • @idolhands50..."It is ridiculous to think that they could not produce a more conclusive video at the time this event took place."...

    ----

    That's my point!... if the Govt. had this pre planned, you would have expected them to shove one of their nice and clear pre made fake video of an A/A jetliner in our face the next day .

  • @marksman500 Your missing my point, I am not saying the Government planned anything.Just strange that a facility of this type could not produce a clear film. Don't you think security of this building to be very high, especially when the WTC towers were hit?Is our Government that moronic? If so, that is even scarier than a conspiracy theories.Lol My problem is what happened to the WTC buildings as far as there collapse.

  • @idolhands50J..."ust strange that a facility of this type could not produce a clear film. Don't you think security of this building to be very high"....

    -----

    Yes, the Pentagon is a very high security area and they rely on the "Armed On-Site Military" to protect it, not cameras.

    They use sec. camares at points of entry such as the guard shacks and entrances, not pointing at a blank wall where the plane hit.

  • @marksman500 After this happened the U.S. Government wanted us to drop our draws in reference to what rights of privacy we should relinquish. Well, they make it a hard sell when they show crap like the video they released, and now have changed their mind on the WTC7 story. Yeah, the NIST is going to explain how the WTC7 went into free fall even though no demolition device was used. We're waiting.

  • @idolhands50..."The guy at the Citgo station never got a chance to even view what was on the video."...

    -----

    I suppose he's the only one that has not seen it besides you.

    9/11 - The Citgo Security Footage com/ watch?v=W6b4UEVKLsY

    Gas stations point sec cams where they expect thefts to occur.

    The screen shows "split views of six cameras."

    2 are from inside the store

    1 South-side camera..Single Pump

    1 East-side Entrance camera..looking back at the store

    1 North-side camera..Dual Pumps

  • @marksman500 Yeah I've seen this and so has he. That was once they decided it was Ok.

  • You are a complete idiot. The "engine" you showed pictures of is a small piece of the high pressure stage of the turbine, not the actual intake fan. That's like showing a small screw from a V-8 engine and saying it must have come from a small engine. You can post youtube videos with stupid conclusions but you can't take 30 seconds to even google them to make sure you're not being a total retard?

  • One out of every 1250 engineers in the 1.7 statistic meets all the following criteria

    1 Has examined the evidence

    2 Agrees that the official story is flawed

    3 Has heard about AE911 truth

    4 Has the courage to sign a public notice of their agreement at risk of, employment problems, being called unamerican, conspiracy theorists, etc.

    Does science, operate under democracy? If one expert in a field disagrees with a theory, does that mean that his argument is invalid because he's a minority?

  • @BoardFlipper5150 take whatever time you need. My intention is not to rush you, just stating that until you are able to cite its source, your information lacks credibility.

  • @BoardFlipper5150 if you can't cite your sources, you have no danger of me quoting you. As it stands, the only architects and engineers that I'm aware of who have come forward formally in favor of the official story have been paid for doing so (such as working for NIST or Popular Mechanics). giving them an obvious bias. If you have information to the contrary, please share it. So far you've just made a few statements you are unable to substantiate.

  • @BoardFlipper5150 I don't follow. Are you now saying 2 million architects and engineers gathered at a pro-Qaddafi rally to oppose their colleagues who have spoken out against the government's explanation for 9/11? It is not logical to say that if an architect or engineer has not actively campaigned against the mainstream story, that therefore they are in support of the mainstream story (if that is your argument; i can tell yet).

  • @BoardFlipper5150 I'm not aware of any organization of architect and engineers who come in in favor of the governments explanation for 9/11. Is there such a group and does it really have 1.7 million members?

  • @BoardFlipper5150 you sure pwned that retard

  • @BoardFlipper5150 you have a point about the disk hub; but I disagree with you about the wreckage not being burnt. As you saw in the footage, there was a *huge* fireball immediately after the plane collides with the Pentagon. Don't you think pieces of wreckage going outwards in that fireball would have burnt? Can you imagine throwing your laptop through that fireball and expecting it not to be burnt?

  • Aluminium will not scorch...It takes a lot of heat to show any change in the surface.

    once it starts to burn it melts quickly. Board Flipper has got it right on the engine.

    the high pressure section and combustion plenium ar rather small when compared to the fan. The fan section will schatter and break apart on impact. The Pentigon is made of steel renforced concrete. The wings would crumple before they would ever penetrate that! You people who don't understand should shut up!

  • damn straight they would lie.

    

  • @BoardFlipper5150 yea....and when i throw a baseball through a window....it only leaves a hole the size of a penny. weeeiiiiiiiird

  • You're mad.

  • @NafffRespect hey cutie, i like you :)

  • Folks. Read my previous comments and research the claims for yourself. then read the NIST report yourself. Like I said freefall due to fire. google nist building 7 final report pdf. says nothing about building "knocked from" foundation. here's some of the experts. they bring up the 1300 architects and engineers (now1580) that's just one of many groups not counting the 911 pilots for truth, 911 scientist for truth. etc.etc.etc. watch?v=T_gE4wZEh0g&feature=pl­­ayer_embedded#!

  • why did the wings from the plane that hit 1 of the towers leave wing marks but not in the pentagon?

  • 2nd peice of debri is a comprseeion disk and is the right size for a 757 i work around these parts daily

  • @hacht4lfe You're wasting your time. Logic & truth has no part in this debate. The fruit loops will just say you've been brainwashed, knobbled, etc. by the CIA

  • notice also very clearly in the 5 frames released to the public from this gas station across the street, that there is no wreckage in the frames outside the pentagon... but yet all these papers are found?!!!! And all these engine parts are outside? Bull fucking shit. you got to be a damn fool to believe this cover up bullshit. It's like Men In Black in this shit, create a hollywood movie to seem the real is impossible.

  • How many people witnessed anything other thatn a passenger jet slam into the Pentagon?

    I'm assuming you reckon those unburnt bits of plane wreckage were placed there? Did anyont witness this?

  • Just because they found no plane at the Pentagon doesn't mean we shouldn't believe the government.. You have to use your imagination. Just keep saying, "A plane hit the Pentagon, a plane hit the Pentagon,..." Maybe it was an invisible plane. They wouldn't lie to us. Would they?

  • @JohnMGilbert maby your a retard maby your a retard

  • @daveygravey123456 Speaking of retards, let's have a little spelling lesson, shall we? First, we start a sentence with a capital letter. Your "maby", I believe you're trying to say "maybe." "Your" is possesive. I think you mean the contraction "you're", short for "you are." You're sentence should read, "Maybe you're a retard." But then again, it's hard for retards to spell.

  • @JohnMGilbert nice spelling lesson, is that how you spell possessive lmfao you mong

  • @JohnMGilbert Please tell me why the us goverment would make all this up i dont get it

  • @JohnMGilbert..." Just because they found no plane at the Pentagon doesn't mean we shouldn't believe the government"...." Maybe it was an invisible plane"...

    --------

    Ya, you can’t have a good conspiracy without the Govt. forgetting to plant plane parts!

    The invisible plane didn't work either as it was seen by hundreds of witnesses.

  • the round piece displayed from 1:18 isnt engine components. this item is part of one of the aircrafts nose wheel. i know this because i fit tyres to these at birmingham airport.(uk) service dept. they weigh 65kg without tyres and are solid steel billet.

    sorry to burst the bubble guys but thats all it is.

  • @TheTattoogaz--Who cares what it is! What is important,is that out of all these photos--well there is absolutely no trace what soever,of a jet airliner engine.How large is a jet-airliner engine? Six?Eight feet round? Where did it go?Who took it, bubble-boy?Where did all the huge parts of the airliner go? Huh? The wings? The tail? All we have in these pics are a piddlie few pieces of very,clean sheets of metal.Where are the burn marks? Where did the freakin engine go, bubble-boy?

  • what ever that is in the photo that is hidden behind the post thing between the cones it is not a 767. Look where the building explodes, 80 meters from the camera approximatly. A 767 or any passenger airliner is huge from that distance!

  • (Concerning the planecrash in Reno Nevada)

    John Townes, a Reno pilot, said the plane didn't sound right moments before the crash.

    "It wasn't quite vertical. It was at a very slight angle and because of that I think it probably saved a lot of people," he said. "Normally when you see an air crash, you see recognizable wreckage. There was nothing, just little bits of metal."

    Also, the crater was only 8 feet wide.

    Guess that must have been a missile in Nevada as well..

  • @LT1HILLINGHOE LOL, I don't mean to laugh but that was funny LT, these idiots on here have NO CLUE what or how an crash site looks. They have " this idea " in " their heads " and jabber about shit they don't know.

  • @iwinofcourse I believe that they do know....but their hatred for George W. Bush won't let them believe the official story and the real truth. Hatred and crack cocaine works on the mind....just look at these truther idiots for proof of that fact.

  • THEY BROUGHT IN AIR-CRAFT PARTS ON TRUCKS,AND PHOTOGRAPHED THEM LATER? THE FIRST WITNESS SEEN NO DEBRIS FIVE MINS AFTER THE STRIKE.

  • Conspiracy theorists are stupid as fuck.

  • @shagbeme Amen to that

  • FUCK THE U.S. GOV. LEGALIZE WEED. HAHA.

  • Comment removed

  • Trust me, if the U.S did want to create another Northwood, they wouldn't bother bombing and killing Pentagon workers, you idiots. They could easily get what they wanted by hitting one tower with one plane, and that would be it. There was no need to damage the Pentagon and kill fellow workers. There for, that's not what they did. The terrorists flew the damn United Airlines plane into the Pentagon. I've seen much wreckage from the plane and people saw the plane fly over their heads. Wake up

  • THATS THE FUCKING MIDDLE OF THE ENGINE U MORON!

  • Hey, bobbbennett! Isn't it great to see all the comments by complete morons, who believe the 'official story' leave their rubbish! All they have, or can do is use profanity, and accuse others of being gay! How pathetic! Of course that means that we are right, AND that the "Officials" are worried! Heh heh. Are they to be just laughed at or pitied OR BETTER YET, Educated!......

  • @ratoig Oh yes, I was just soooooo educated by that rambling and didn't say shit to prove anything comment of yours, didn't your parents talk to you about smoking pot ?

  • give, you ever seen dominoes fall before. i guess you need to go back to pre K and learn about them. watch the video "why the towers fell" because u have ur "facts" all wrong

  • @anotherdrummer23 you deserve to be sent to an island in the tropics and be left to starve to death. And if it was my choice i would do that to you. your facts about why the towers fell are completely wrong, the reason they fell is because they werent built to withstand a jet hitting them. the engineers thought they would but it was designed different than most buildings. and you retard what do you think is going to happens when a couple of the tressels give, they all

  • @habichtbe THANK YOU Habichtbe, I've been trying for 5 days to tell these morons that.

  • @iwinofcourse HOW ABOUT THIS YOU INBRED FUCK? YOU,AND ALL THE REST OF THE DICK-RIDERS PULL THE MANS NUT-SACK FROM YOUR ASSES,AND ADMIT"THE MAN"KILLED PEOPLE FROM SEVERAL NATIONS,AND THAT IT WAS A JOINT EFFORT BY SEVERAL NATIONS BLAMED ON ISLAMICS. YES,A ZIONIST FALSE FLAG USED TO STEAL THE WORLD BLIND. THEN MAYBE YOU DICK RIDERS WILL GROW A SET,AND HELP THE WORLD SET IT RIGHT. NAH. STAY ON THE MANS NUT-SACK. FAGGOT! FAGGOT! FAGGOT! BITCH! HO! PUNK! CUM-DRUNK NEO YUPPIE HATIN-ASS BIYACH! LOLOL!

  • @61TUNER Can you repeat that ?

  • @iwinofcourse ASK YOUR MOTHER. HIJO.

  • it was a real plane the wht mistory pln was a command base for the drone that hit that blding i no because aaaaaaaaaa

  • another drummass 23,your a fucking gov. ass wipe go suck some of your fagget ass buddys you lie-n bitch

  • my friend has some stills and video of someof this that the gov. has not aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa i guess i was told to stop the end for sale

  • You are crazy.

  • I think you wanted to be popular on youtube so you picked up stuff from the junkyard

  • My favorite:

    Think for yourself you fucking retard!! Don't just believe everything you hear you fucking retard!! Believe all of my nonsensical bullshit without questioning it, you fucking retard!!!

    You reading this?? Yeah you are, you fucking retard!

  • Your comparing a brand new testing PW2040, to the actual scorched compressor disk from the Rolls Royce RB211 engine, These parts are commonly made of either titanium or stainless steal, The blades were sheared off to there dove tail slots. And as for the video, You can clearly tell its a long distance from the camera to the aircrafts position, and it clearly look to be the size of a 757-200.

  • This video is just plain fucking stupid the queer who made it makes no sense at all.

  • guys give him a break, that day on CNN even the reporter said there was absolutely no sign that a plane had hit the pentagon as there was no debris which would include wings or tail of the plane at the scene. as a matter of fact i can even give you the link to the other video.

  • @TonyMidnight2011 just look up this video " "NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON" report aired only once (Countdown to the 10th Anniversary of 9/11)"

  • @TonyMidnight2011 HEY DUMMY, Google Flight 77 wreckage, Jesus, how many stupid mother fuckers are actually out there ?

  • Yeah, they found plane parts. None were scorched from the bombs, they so claimed, were on the planes.

  • I feel bad for you. I assume you've spent a lot of time seeking attention through skepticism, and if that's the validation you desire I hope you get it. In reality, with the rest of us, there was no false flag operation. I'm not sure why you feel the need to convince others of your delusions, but all you're accomplishing is perpetuating the same fear mongering you're trying to uncover. IF they had done it, you'd just be playing into their hands. Good thing that's crazy.

  • you people all lack common sense! how in the world is a camera gonna catch a plane, flying AT 345 MILES PER HOUR, hitting a building? and if it does catch it its gonna be nothing but a slight blur, which im guessing none of you saw when the video was at 43 seconds.... YALL ARE IDIOTS!!

  • And, by the way, when a plane hits a solid, reinforced structure, it is disintegrated, meaning it is reduced to a million small pieces...and the comparison of the circular object and the jet engine being worked on seems to indicate that you think the circular object is a fan from the front of an airplane engine, but it looks more like the central hub of one of the wheels than an engine fan. Engine components are not closed-faced...

  • @TheGamer0451 Your half right, maybe before you open your mouth, you should read what the government says. They say EXACTLY : "the wings of the plane folded into the fuselage and slipped into the hole and burned up with the rest of the plane" THAT's What we all disagree with, if they wanted to lie they SHOULD have said that it hit the walls and disintegrated, they would have had a better chance with that lie. But not the one they told. Open your minds shut your mouths

  • Anyone else notice something WRONG with the security camera footage? Footage of the hit and explosion look like time-lapse photography, then after the explosion, the footage becomes continuous video feed...OBVIOUSLY multiple frames were REMOVED from the footage before it was posted in this conspiracy video! You whack-jobs will do anything to support your theories, even cutting the truth out of your videos! IDIOT!!!

  • @TheGamer0451 Game I've been at these idiots for the last 5 days, they are so brainwashed, they don't have a clue that there are people in this world that hate America and even though they saw 911 with their own 2 eyes they let the " haters " tell them that what they're seeing isn't really there. AND THEY BELIEVE THEM !!!! Some terrorists killed almost 3000 of our people and the rest brainwashed these idiots to think we did this to ourselves. WOW, calling them stupid is an understatement

  • The government could have done that and put plane itemsa in the buildign and blew it up. :3

  • 1:18

    That isn't a plane engine. I figured that out on a factual show.

  • 0:39 I see no damn plane!

  • I sit here on the anniversary of 911 in astonishment!!! It's been TEN YEARS, and we are still getting ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT from the Government AND the MEDIA! Even Coast to Coast AM has been compromised tonight! There is NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE that ANY Airliner was anywhere NEAR the Pentagon!!!!!!! What is wrong with people! Answer: Complete BRAIN WASHING!!!!! I mourn for this country. It is doomed..... JESUS help us!!!!

  • were you there? did you see that plane fly over your head? did you run in to rescue the few that made it out in the impact zone? If you can't answer yes to any of those questions, then you can't make up your stupid theories. I lived it, and my friends rescued burned people and recoved dead people. Grow up and have some respect.

  • wow. you're stupid.

  • It breaks my heart to know that some half-wit people honestly believe it was some kind of inside job.

  • The turbine diameter is much less than the diameter of the fans.  You can see in the photo that the engine narrows considerably.

  • Someone tell me, WHY is it so hard to believe, why is it impossible, why is it so AMAZING to you people that someone that was in one of the branches of the military was there at the Pentagon 10 years ago and is NOW on Youtube talking to you morons ? Why is that so hard to believe ? I'll tell you why, because you're a bunch of fucking idiots, that's why.

  • @iwinofcourse no body cares about you or where you were on 9/11 

  • @Dank0g What ? Where have YOU been in this conversation, we stopped talking about 911 HOURS AGO POTHEAD !!!! and started talking about you using bongs to smoke pot and that your nose is the size of Alabama. How did we go backwards to 911 again ? Yeah, you're Ok, Nah, no brain damage there.

  • @iwinofcourse oh oh im sorry i didn't reply 5 second later i was busy. talking about 9/11 hmmmmm i don't know MAYBE because the video is about 9/11 hahahhaha oh old man :) ohhh yea guys COME CHECK 0OUT MY CHANNEL!! I HAVE A HUGE NOSE THE SIZE OF ALAFUCKINGBAMA APPARENTLY AND I SMOKE A LOTTA WEEEEED!!! IF YOU LIKE WEED COME SMOOOOOOKE!!

  • @Dank0g We were talking about 911 hours ago DUMMY !!!! I know why you smoke pot, you're just a typical stereotype just like the other potheads. " My mother didn't love me enough wah wah, my father was never around wah, wah ,wah " Grow the fuck up already Nosenstein

  • @iwinofcourse bahahhahaha!! oh old man old man!!! who said anything about my parents??? my parents love me and have happily been married for almost 30 years :) My father and i hung out every wednesday until i started college and my mommy and i still go on shopping sprees together :) u can say im actually kinda spoiled :) u on the other hand.. im so sorry.

  • @Dank0g Sure, sure, we believe you, and I bet they're SO proud that their precious little girl is a fucking stoner, yes when you were a baby they envisioned you to one day grow up and be this pothead stoner. Yes we believe you when you say your parents love you, it's written all over your face and we can see it in your glassy eyes. LMFAO !!!!!!!!

  • @iwinofcourse yea i know right? i get that a lot. Cuz im so happy all the time :) nothing lets me down. Its ok old man i mean i don't know what its like to be a fucking pathetic unloved loser like you but im sure you'll make it through your last few years alone on this planet juuust fine... try smoking a lil you'll live longer (although i don't know why anyone would want to) ;) im done with you old fart.

  • @Dank0g Of course you're happy all the time and nothing gets you down, it's because YOU'RE FUCKING STONED ALL THE TIME YOU IDIOT !!!!!! OMG how fucking dumb can one person be ? You have enough dumb in you for an entire town. LMFAO !!!!!!

  • You conspiracy idiots only hear what you want to hear and then make things worse for everyone. Our kids see 5 minutes of bullshit like this then we have to explain for an hour how idiots like you think so they don't get caught up in your stupidity. You make me sick!

  • reality ,conspiracy, too many say one thing and next thing you know you can`t believe either side!......10 years and still no answers........it happened and how can we stop it from happening again?

  • A missle? If the government was behind it wouldn't it be easier to just use a plane? Why take a chance that a tourist or news crew may be filming. All the eye witnesses would see a missle instead of a plane. It doesn't make any sense. No video must equal no plane? You claim the gov't flew planes into the WTC but shot a missle at the Pentagon? Gimme a break .

  • WHAT. THE. FUCK. How dare you? How DARE you?! Disrespecting people's LIVES. You might as well spit on their graves. Think what you want, but those people lost their lives. Their worlds. I am so shocked that you could even say this. So you're saying the gov't knew about WTC too? That they let their own people die? Or was the WTC staged too? Yeah, ok. Whatever you say. Tell that to the jumpers. The firefighters. The New Yorkers who watched it fall and burn. The 2,000 that lost their lives.
  • @melaniedworak 2,994 people died. In a false flag "terrorist" attack.

    Hardly seems disrespectful to try to find out the truth. I find it disrespectful to just ignore all the questions that have been raised. I think we owe it to those 2,994 people to find the TRUTH.

  • @melaniedworak bush was sent a note 6 days before from the terrorists warning him about the attacks. It was translated the day after 9/11. 6 days?!

  • no offense but in every single pic u showed, something was burnt

  • Comment removed by government.

  • A) That's not an engine.

    B) There were dozens of witnesses including pilots who identified the plane.

    C) Many of the parts were sheered off outside when the plane hit multiple light poles.

    Anything else? No?

  • @BriansVideoHobby Wrong. Frist of all if a plane in a light pole that will be like a car hitting a mailbox, and the witnesses were put there by the government.

  • @iwin, who says they even got on the plane? were murdered before the flight took off or held prisoner somewhere! Mr. intelligent!

  • Barbara Olson was on flight 77, she was a celebratie and a beautiful smart lady , she was on her way to appear on "politically incorrect" with bill mauer, her husband is big too, forget what he did but it was poitical, so where is she ??? It has been reported that she called her husband 2 times during the hi-jacking, this girl would not play games, if she were alive she would be back on c-span.

  • I was thinking those thoughts before 9-11, with this flight 77 I remember seeing witnesses on the news who SAW this plane dive into the Pentagon, and what happened next was that our government gathered up all the security camera tapes from all the businesses in the area and have refused to release them or the security tapes from the Pentagon and I think they are just trying to encourage doubt, but why ???

  • I've been getting numerous comments from a lot of you but you're all just telling me theories, SHOW ME PROOF of a missile, I told you all to Google Flight 77 plane wreckage, I asked where are the passengers & crew, I gave you names of passengers that worked with my cousin, there are dozens of eyewitnesses that saw the plane. I'm giving you PROOF now I want just ONE of you to give me some REAL PROOF of your missile or whatever besides Flight 77 theory and not some made up bullshit in your head.

  • in daylight with thousands of witnesses and our government could not hide the facts and was forced to admit we were at war with moslem terrorists, and only then did our government react to and fight back and in my opinion we have not fought this war to win, we could have won this war in monthds had our government wanted .

  • I believe terrorists had been attacking America for years and our government covered up those attacks, planes full of helpless civilians like flight 800 were shot down and our government blamed "electronics" embassies were bombed, the USS Cole was bombed and our government covered up the facts and did nothing, so the terrorists bombed us again on 9-11

  • @21Mickyman thats actually actually an interesting theory. even though its far-fetched it makes more sense then our government crashing planes into 1.5 billion dollars of its own investment.

  • thanks iwin for trying to argue , I do not have the energy.

  • @21Mickyman My God Micky I really can't believe how stupid most of these people are, they're like cattle, one moos and the rest moo right along. I'm really started to think that all the years of drugs and drinking have finally given them brain damage. Some make absolutely no sense whatsoever.

  • Yes Bobbbennett it must be you, when you were showing the back and forth photo's of the engines anyone with eyes could see that it was two different parts not the same part, you see a circular black metal piece of a plane crash and ASSUME it's the same piece of that intact jet engine you were showing. Also did you notice all the smoke at around 1:00 ? That was from jet fuel, a missile wouldn't smoke like that after it detonates, concrete doesn't burn with all that smoke. You are a retard.

  • looks burned and scorched to me...and the engine part is the hub from the front of the engine and is @ 3 feet across. So, yes, it is you, and you're nuts.

  • NEVER FORGET world trade center 7 it was never hit by anyplanes or debris and it still fell

  • @DrDickSlap That's right BUT when the towers fell ( within a few hundred feet of WTC 7 ) the force was like a megaton bomb, WTC 7 and WTC 6 were severely damaged by that, 7 caught on fire and collapsed 7 1/2 hours later so suck on THAT Dick. Thank you so much for your " conspiracy theory " you moron.

  • @iwinofcourse So why was there no investigation into the FIRST EVER collapse of a steel high-rise due to fire?

    First time EVER in history. And we don't ask any questions??? Seems like an expert such as yourself would find that curious.......

  • @iwinofcourse

    Hi, I really don't want to believe that some people in our OWN gov't had something to do with this. My question, and is all I can really say and ask is why? Why did the FBI waited 5 years after lawsuits to only show 5 frames for what looks like it could be almost anything? I am not trying to start any theories. I am just asking why? Since you answered someone else in here regarding building 7 collapsing cause of the other building. Thanks

  • @sykane9 Can you show me where you got that from? I never heard that EXACT story? Regardless of that for a moment, I want you to understand something,the Pentagon is the most important place for our nations security and I don't think they should show anything about it. The reason they showed the WTC at all different angles is because the WTC was an office building not a federal facility. I was there on 911 and trust me it was Flight 77 not a missile like some of these bozos want you to believe.

  • @iwinofcourse intresting you use the word "bomb" since thats how they fell

  • @DrDickSlap Yup, typical conspiracy theorist, taking everything out of context.

  • @iwinofcourse it collapsed with a text book crimp in the middle. buildings that are purposly demolished are done so by blowing a central support in the structure, to get a textbook crimp and the building falls into itself causing no damage to sorrounding structures. also all buildings, 1, 2, and 7 are steel structures. the government's explanation in the 9-11 report was fire theory, causing a "pancake" collapse. never once before 9-11 or after has a steel structure collapsed from fire

  • @stevan5 Stew WTC 7 was basically knocked off it's foundation by WTC 1 falling and hence catching on fire and 7 hours later collapsing, 1 and 2 couldn't handle the weight above their breaches and because of their design they pancaked when the top floors fell. Other steel structures weren't designed like the WTC and also a steel framed building in Madrid collapsed very similar to the towers once so don't say steel structures don't collapse because they obviously do..

  • @iwinofcourse read the NIST report on bld 7 pg 90. Took them 7 yrs to concoct after changing the story the 1st time and failing miserably to explain it in 2005. says the foundation or damage from WTC1 had nothing to do with the collapse of 7. just the fire. also admits 100ft/ about 8 stories of 0 resistance freefall. 1000's of experts have put there reputation on the line saying it's impossible for bld7 to come down the way it did without explosives.

  • @cyclops9100 Stupidass, stupidass, stupidass the " truthers " were saying it was bombed, I said it came down by fire from the towers collapsing and it was knocked from it's foundation, and SHOW ME where 1000's of experts said that it was impossible to collapse like that without explosives ? Watch this everyone, this is when I become David Copperfield and make Cyclops disappear. All that writing just to look like a jackass, great job, keep up the good work asshole.

  • @iwinofcourse Folks. Read my previous comments and research the claims for yourself. then read the NIST report yourself. Like I said freefall due to fire. google nist building 7 final report pdf. says nothing about building "knocked from" foundation. here's some of the experts. they bring up the 1300 architects and engineers (now1580) that's just one of many groups not counting the 911 pilots for truth, 911 scientist for truth. etc.etc.etc. watch?v=T_gE4wZEh0g&feature=pl­ayer_embedded#!

  • @iwinofcourse Also read the part in the bld 7 NIST report p90 that says this is the first known instance where fire induced damage led to the collapse to a tall building. Don't get mad at truthers for using evidence straight from where you are trying to agrue your bogus points and conclusions, that you havn't even read.

  • oh yea... "you moron..."

  • @iwinofcourse All 3 buildings fell in the exact same free fall style despite having been damaged in different ways and in different sections respectively. Had Building 7 come down due to the damage imposed upon it by the collapse of the two towers it would have been uniquely compromised in a different manner than the towers and therefore would have fallen in a different manner. The buildings were clearly brought down by controlled demolition.

  • @marcriv80 Great Marc, Ok so now PROVE THAT, I'm actually getting sick of explaining it over and over and over to you stupid conspiracy idiots so now YOU prove that to me since that's what you're attesting to. Not YOUR words, Show us from "reputable sources" and not your cousin Fred or the guy at works theory, show me something I can read. This should be good everyone, watch this.

  • well done freind

  • What happened the people on the plane? Are you saying that even the familes of these folks are involved??? None of you can answer this....so all of you are full of shit & all of you should have been in tower one as it came down....I shit on your piece of shit lives 1,000 times

  • @6n6n6666 Um, we don't know what happened. Isn't that sorta the point? If the government has nothing to hide, then release ALL the video footage available and answer some questions. If it weren't so suspicious, then there wouldn't be such an issue, yeah?

  • HEY MORONS !!!! If it wasn't Flight 77 then where are the passengers & crew you dipshits ? Why didn't ANY of them ever return to their homes, jobs, etc. ? Are they all living on an island with Elvis ? C'mon smartasses answer my question.

  • @iwinofcourse they cant cos they are all fulla shit....anyone with a job knows this was not a conspiracy....fuck these jerkoffs

  • @iwinofcourse Well, flight 77 wasn't even scheduled to fly that day.

  • @IndependentForPres OK if it wasn't suppose to fly that day then tell me where are all the passengers & crew that are on the Flight 77 list of missing or dead ? Did they ALL decide to take a permanent vacation together forever ? C'mon use your brain and stop listening to these morons.

  • @iwinofcourse Don't know, but I know it was a plane that hit the pentagon.

  • @iwinofcourse Your not going to get anywhere with "Hey Morons" comment. Ppl have to refilter that bullshit just to listen to you after inflammatory name calling. Besides your emotional upheaval, you have a point for sure. I was just thinking... who was on that flight. Anyway, The vid makes a few good points too that an intelligent person cant ignore either (just like your comment). 1st, lake of plane wreckage (google images of commercial plane crashes), 2nd, why WOULDN"T they release tapes?