Wow if this is not an act, this guy is going to die of a stroke soon- what an angry, hateful little man! Until I saw his picture, I envisioned him as an ugly little troll.
He'de sell out and was mostly a liberal in rebublicans clothing. He sided mostly with the dems. AND I VOTED FOR HIM ! I DIDNT WANT HIM...BUT WHATS THE ALTERNATIVE..OBAMA ? Someone read LIBERTY AND TYRANNY and find out something about our constitution. Dont be uninformed like most "PROGRESSIVES." and of course I know some Progressive libs with reply with a very angry, demeaning response.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
news flash: The UNITED STATES WAS NOT FOUNDED BY CHRISTIANS. Our founding fathers were DEISTS. This idiot Levin is wrong when he says our constitution was founded on judeo-christian values. And he lies about nearly every thing else. This guys is a disgrace to our nation.
Mark Levin speaks of truth and wisdom, while you idiot liberals speaks of deception and destruction. You liberals are the economic parasites of society, you keep on attacking conservatives who made this country great yet you always took advantage of them, what a weird mentality by these liberals.
Is that the excuse you use to support a tall, good looking, well spoken president that would enslave you and your children? You want to bring back The Great Vimar Republic, but only under the condition that the leader have better looking hair? (What's his name did have the worst comb over in HISTORY.)
The true "liberal" seeks understanding and humanity at all costs for all people. The true "conservative" believes in his innate superiority to all other cultures and institutions, and feels justified in defending his land by any means necessary, and the enrichment of his own self at all costs. In this sense, there is greater similiarity to the Taliban and Mark Levin.
Those seem to be big words there; did you copy and paste them from somewhere. And if you're using them to defend McCain or Obama, then one thing is clear: you're certainly no political scientist. ;)
He didn't have a choice? What about the libertarian or the other independents? He was a big time hypocrites. I saw him praise the man, and stop calling him "Mclame" for awhile. After he lost, he went back to his foolishness. Levin is a tool partisan hack.
No it doesn't; it makes him a pragmatist. For hypocrisy, you need look no further than Barack Obama: a walking, breathing, barely thinking testament to very institutionalization of it. "Americans must conserve" as he adjusts his thermostat to his unusual comfort level; "Don't go to Las Vegas, that's MY job"; "we should all drive tiny, unsafe cars. Well, by 'we', I mean you..." ;) Yep, Fine fellow there.
How often have you listened to his show? A big hack doesn't buckle down and support a guy he can't stand because it's better than the alternative. As for choosing a third party candidate last election, that's a little like people who drive the Prius: they don't do it because it really makes a difference; they do it so they can feel morally superior and for no good reason. Moral superiority doesnt really equal political autism. :)
I suggest you read a little chomsky or michio kaku or thom hartman. All 3 men are far more brilliant and humane than Levin, who is blinded by his own prejudices. Here's another one for you. "3 cups of tea" by Greg Mortenson. An inspiring story of a true humanitarian.
If we're really interested in liberating people and protecting ourselves, there are more effective and humane ways of doing so then endless war. Even a fool understands that war begets more war.
Can you do the world a favor? Get into a car, and drive it really really fast into a cement wall. Trust me, you won't feel a thing if you do it right.
What the hell is wrong with you people? You will vote for a goon that promises to take money from your fellow citizens to fund the taking of life in the womb, the most precious and innocent, but you abhore Mark Levin. How can you vote for a subsistent living at the expense of the working man when your small check that barely gets you by promises to rape the working man's future, while the politicians fly around in private jets with escort hotties? Stop being a bunch of mislead fools!
Wow! Crazy, stupid, and dumb. You are a literary genious. We should discount this man's statements and bow at your feet. Then we can be sane, reasonable, and smart. Jesus should ask you for an autograph. You are a fool and the truth is not in you. You hate what is right and speak evil against all who practice moral living and teaching. Obama just raped your future for another 1.2 trillion dollars to the deficite and you are criticizing this man?" You are a a complete idiot!
My interpretation is that many of Levin's listeners certainly suffer from low self-esteem... how else can they go around calling this little pos "great one"
levin is absolutely no Reagan. levin is a little poop in a big toilet, hoping not to get seen or flushed. He's looking to make some dollars off of sponsorship if his crap of his takes off. He's just a loser... let it go
No, Jesus laid down his own life willingly out of love for all people you liar! Your lies flow straight from the mouth of satan himself. You dare to use the name of the son of the most high to condemn when he came to save? You are an abomination full of contempt for your fellow man and devoid of truth! Mark Levin is a good man who rejects the idea that intellectuals in positions of authority have absolute wisdom and power over the common man. He is on your side you idiot!
And now he's promoting John McCain... LOL goes to show that its the people above these hosts who are paying them to say all this... I bet "the great one" wouldn't be talking like this now WTF... This nut job is so loud and angry, I'm surprised anyone listens. He actually makes Limbaugh look like a teddy bear.
I believe this essentially makes my point. It is undeniable our economy has slowed over the last few years, particularly for most Americans, as the dollar fell and the price of gas shot up along with ancillary prices. Curiously, the worst of this has been seen since Democrats took back the Congress in 2006. Nevertheless, things are not nearly as horrific as the Obama camp prefers to portray; by his account we are reliving the Great Depression.
Interesting post; however, it offers very little to the discussion. Per chance might you spare everyone the bloviating as well as your own insults - impersonal or personal - and provide something a little more substantive. As crass and as incorrect as my other commenter below is, at least he proffered a point.
The only jobs Bill Clinton created were ones directly under his control in the Federal government, but Congress still had to allocate the funds. At least for the paying jobs. Interesting your choice of expletive, since that segues nicely into the other type Clinton created. As far as private sector employment, Clinton simply went along with Congress to get government out of the way of people so they could do their thing.
Nope. The Bush administration for the most part, continued on with Clinton's policies, and in many areas expanded them and caused even more bloat and wasteful spending. The difference between then and now is in the Congress, when Conservatives gave way to the Rockefeller Republicans around 2000, who worked with the libs to screw every one of us over.
I suppose that's why the church of Obama has been a member for over 20 years actually has written into its philosophy that members shun all things middle class. Look it up. At any rate, I really hate to break it to you, but Obama and Bush are not so fundamentally different, apart from rhetheric, of course. Don't be such a sheep, my friend. :) As for voting records, Obama, when he votes, votes partisan 100% of the time. Obama has done nothing for you in the Senate...when he shows up.
Nope, just another realist. Between McCain and Obama McCain is the best choice, especially now that Palin's on the ticket. It's what we rational people do, Dewy; you libs should try it sometime. Unlike Obama, we can actually change our view based on a re-evaluation of the available data without melting down into a shaking glob of insecure emotional breakdown, curling up in the corner in the fetal position. ;)
Oh yes! As awesome as when Newt was speaker of the House! Good days economically, indeed! Now, as for the Oral Office, I doubt you really mean that. Perjury aside, WJC's part in creating a Chinese monster capable of nuking us all to high heaven militarily and economically and the alienation of post-Soviet Afghanis will be (and have been) haunting us in the most tragic ways.
Oh yes, those terrorist women and children Saddam killed. I think we all remember those. Granted, Bush tends to chronic dishonesty and I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him, which is why he and Obama would get along just fine.
This war is not unconstitutional, nor is it illegal. Instead of throwing around those terms since you hear other liberals use it, and you like to regurgitate it, why don't you cite the specific law, or part of the constitution that has been violated? Until then, shut the hell up.
Mark Levine is one of those idiots that keep trying to repackage and resell the Iraq war to the gullible. There is nothing conservative about waging war in Iraq and there is nothing unpatriotic about being against the war. Where do these jerkoffs get this from?
That sounds like a fine and well-thought out, original, and quite clever argument, warrior; except that none of it is true. Even top Dems have conceded Iraq has turned around. Perhaps you need to come join us in the present day and put down your Obama Kool-Aid.
Well I hate Obama and I hate the Democratic and Republican parties. I would rather join the good old fashioned American way which is peace and prosperity, that is what America is really about or should be about if the founding father's influence had any meaning in the present day.
Also wasn't the war on terror supposedly waged against the number 1 terrorist Osama bin Laden? Well where is Mr. bin Laden? I'll tell you where he is, he's having lobster tails in Kennebunkport, Maine with the Bushes. This country cannot afford to keep borrowing money to wage war and rebuild countries, it needs to be spent here. Get rid of the neocons and the neoliberals and get some people in there that have this country's interest in mind instead of their own perks.
Well, I doubt the statement "I'll tell you where he is, he's having lobster tails in Kennebunkport, Maine with the Bushes" will win anyone over; because it is a rediculous thing to say. I agree with you about the neocons and neolibs 100%; however, while the war is not as simplistic as either of them say it is, it is neccesary for a simple reason: if we do not protect our interests abroad, we will be cleaning up after the terrorists here.
Just because the mayor is corrupt, doesn't mean there are no crooks on the streets to clean up. Getting rid of the mayor and hiding our heads in the sand will do nothing for America's long-term survival.
Wouldn't the simple thing be to increase border security here? It sure would cost a lot less than this war does. And the comment I made about bin Laden and the Bushes isn't really all that ridiculous when you consider that the media no longer talks about bin Laden, he's never mentioned by Bush in any of his speeches. The simple fact is that they don't want bin Laden. There should never have been an invasion of Iraq, it's costing 400 million dollars a day to keep this up.
There is no incentive for the new Iraqi government to take over the security of their own nation while American forces are there. We simply cannot afford to keep doing this sort of thing. Are we going to continue to borrow money from China? This is ridiculous. Look at the price of gas and other goods in this country, look at the slump in the economy. Do you not see the correlation here? We prop dictators up then we become enemies with them, we can't keep doing this.
You're right, there is nothing unpatriotic about opposing the war. Just thank the soldiers for giving you that right. Also, Iraq was just as much about compassion to the people of Iraq than WMDs. Sadaam was a tyrant that needed to be taken out. Other people we should help are in Burma, Darfur, and numerous other places.
I wonder what Mark Levin stands for now that McCain is the "presumptive nominee". Will he eat his values to vote for lesser of two evils or will he be principled and continue to protest the election.
ha ha ha... back to 1974 sad butt true. Maybe if i click my manly heels ( he he he) and say there's no one like conservative's this will all be just a nightmare. Oh well one can.. HOPE smile.
I'm a traitorous scumbag lib myself. I might even vote for John Mccain. I hope levin and his fan base hate my guts. I'd even be willing to go on his show and get him all worked up and pissed off at me.
I'll hold my nose and vote for mccain. He was NOT my first pick , that went to Rick Santorum when he was a no show to run i then went for Fred Thompson. mccain is better sort of than hillary or b. hussein obama.
I hear ya. McCain was my absolute last choice. Well, actually, that was the whack job Ron Paul (lol that my two last choices in the Republican party were a nazi and a liberal). Either way though, we're back in 1974 with Gerald Ford whether we like it or not.
A Nazi and Liberal, interesting that you'd choose those two, I'm curious how you came up with such an ill informed description of such. Nazi's took away rights and promoted aggressive war while liberals like socialists have slowly eroded our economic freedoms and in the case of illegal immigration, our security. I'm curious for you to clarify how these describe either McCain or Paul.
Twits like davis with the "be nice" nonsense is what has brought the politcal process to its current state. Nasty, rotten, name calling politcal speech is a time honored tradition, going back to Greece and Rome. Also have you ever watched a meeting of Parliment? It makes the stuff Mark says look like Sesame Street. Please unclench the over tight ass and relax. P.S. I ROLL when he calls her "her thighness" and Barack "Millhouse" Obama...lol
So true. People who wish to squash passionate dialogue are secretly hoping the public gets bored and goes away as pointy heads try to out-drone each other with dry policy minutia, instead of frying the biggest fish that need it the most. How about a candidate who hears the people (re borders, freedom of speech, etc.). Way more important to America than whether a politician's feelings get hurt.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is the kind of nut Levine is. "John McClain"? You're very intelligent Levin. When you disagree with anyone, just change their name. He call's Hillary "Her Thighness" listen Levern, as people age, generally they do put on weight. We all can't be slim Leverns. I'm sick and tired of all these skunks screaming about one think or another. Levern, Limbaugh, Coulter, and Olberman, please note, your rocket ship is departing. None of them can begin with "I disagree with (name) and here is why.."
"Levern"? You must be very intelligent, too, davisracquet. If you had actually listened to the clip, you would have noted Levin gave a number of reasons for why he disagrees with McCain. Then again, that's probably why he is considered one of America's top constitutional lawyers and you're not, my friend. Thanks for playing. ;)
man I've always wanted to know what this subhuman piece of shit levin looked like. The only exposure I have with him is hearing his fascist tirades on hate radio.
John McAmnesty/McKennedy will never win the presidency, no matter what the Globalist, Open Borders, Amnesty, NAFTA, Fox News, CNN, etc.. supporters say, without a rigged election. He didn't have the support at the beginning of the year; financially or voter support, ex:laying of staff, until Amnesty/ Open Borders Advocates and Lobbiest came to his rescue. Against 70-80% of the voting public who want borders closed??. And he won't have the Rep. conservative, MILITARY VOTE, either.
But he will lie to the American people about shutting down the borders just like Bush did to win in 2004. McCain's about as conservative as Jimmy Carter.
Aw c'mon Levin. Bush loves McCain. You should be happy that Lieberman is following MCcain around in the Middle East right now to keep him in a fresh change of diapers and coach him in the differencr between Extremists and Terrorists.
OMG, what a whiner. This is "the Great One?" ILMAO.
It is what it is, kombanos. It's also immature to begin your sentence without the proper capitalization, but with trolls and RINOs running amuck around here, I guess we can't be too picky. ;)
Sorry, His voting record is indefencible. Being a "MexiCain" supporter, it must be easy for you to cross party lines, as it were. It's easy for you to "give" here or there.
To me, some things are not on the negotiating table.
I predict that a large compliment of legit conservatives will block his chances of winning the general election.
By the way, if I vote for a candidate that is diameterically opposed to every core value I have, wouldn't I be just as guilty as McClame?
First, I didn't support McCain months ago b/c I don't like everything of him but he's more conservative OVERALL than the Dems, if you compare the voting records. To answer your question, sure, to some extent, but you're supposed to pick the BEST candidate to you, not the SAME candidate, in terms of core values. SOMETHING or NOTHING, my friend.
My honest sense after careful review is that there is little (if any) distinction between parties these days. Presidential candidates notwhitstanding. If we go to hell as a nation, better it be during the dems watch.
...Perhaps if he would admit his liberal proclivities, I could repect him enough to support him. But no, He is a liberal piece of shit flip flopper, to the degree that Obama seems less destructive. It's over for us conservatives. Period. Why give in?
My position is simple. I don't want anything MexiCain can accomplish. His accomplishments are antithetical to the republican platform. Better nothing should get done. Have you listened to this video? Levin puts forth my views elegantly.
My position is keep fighting for conservatism, or accept defeat graciously.
McCain thinks otherwise, and that's why he will lose the election. Even if he wins, we still lose. It's over for the time being.
OK, so what makes Romney better than McCain? Is he more conservative? Is he more consistent than McCain? If that is so, there are YouTube videos on him flipflopping. From what I've observed, it seems the reason McCain won is because he flipflopped on fewer issues. Since conservatives like criticizing liberals on hypocrisy, that explains McCain's victory.
I take issue with your interpretation here. Society is moving further & further away from conservatism. There used to be a difference between the 2 parties. Not anymore. McCain wins because he's a liberal. That is the trend, and that's how people are voting these days. (Republicans lost both houses last elections) It sucks, but those are the breaks.
Romney has only changed on Abortion and Gay rights. And they were not flip flopps, they were actually changing his mind. How do I know this? He only changed once. And he changed when poll numbers said he should stay on his current position.
McCain has flip-flopped on immigration. He was against the Bush tax cuts for the same reason the dems were against them. And on everything else, he's LIBERAL.
Wrong, he was against the tax cuts because he believed that addressing in cutting spending was important, something Bush hasn't done resulting in a deficit. You say he's a liberal but is he as liberal as Obama or Clinton? Give me some PROOF. BTW, where do you stand on Iraq, which is another important issue?
Maybe. So he flipflopped, but is he for tax increases? So you don't like where he stands on every issue but you did not answer my question of whether he is just as liberal as Obama (whom I think is going to win) and Hillary? Also, do you want withdraw from Iraq immediately? Can't get everything you want, sorry.
I'm sorry if I did but I thought one of the reason Romney didn't win was because of all this talk from evangelicals about his Mormonism. Anyway, religion should not be a main issue here.
Thank you. I did not mean to lash out, but the evangelicals are not a very large majority, to my knowledge. But I KNOW of some Evangelicals that were for Romney.
wow let me guess where you live, alabama, You are a stupid ass redneck. You want victory in iraq, do you have any idea what the fuck you are talking about. There is no winning, there is no reason for fighting, we went into iraq for no good reason( except for oil and bc GB senior couldnt catch Sadam). He used fear as his tactic for support saying that saddam has weapons of mass destruction, you want to know how many they have found so far ...0, go home, sit on the couch,eat corn and watch NASCAR
#2: McCain has no friggan idea what he's doing EXCEPT for the war. No economic, social clue.
#3: No, he told the truth about Saddam Hussien.
#4:The fact that a liberal is coming to his defense is PROOF that he is a nasty choice. Why is he our nominee? Because of Dem/Ind cross-over votes. Why are you pissed? Because we're using your own tactics against you.
My suggestion: Go back to China where you came from, you Lib!
Weak-minded. Stay away from voting if you have no intelligence. Reagan would not give up, why should you? Get a clue, kiddo. Look at McCains voting record.
Your economy is going to hell in a handbasket, Tax cuts can indeed help save you along with cutting government spending so yah it is important, nice try though lefist...
When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld various anti-polygamy statues in the late 1800s, Romney's great-grandparents fled to Mexico so the men could bang multiple wives and "practice their religion." The family returned to the United States after Mitt's father was born. In summation: Mitt Romney's ancestors were horny polygamists, and his father was a Mexican immigrant.
Mark wasn't complaining then and he isn't complaining now. He is doing whatever he can to prevent McCain from receiving the Republican nomination because he has (as do I) legitimate objections to McCain. Mark did not support any of the nominees because there was not candidate that represented what he believes, which makes sense to me. Now those of us that object to McCain are doing what we can to defeat him. It's that simple.
Mark Levin is apparently someone you are unfamiliar with and someone you claim not to know. And yet for some reason you post a reply to a reply to a YouTube video of the person you've never heard of. I don't know what could be more pathetic.
If you are a republican and don't support McCain to become the GOP nominee then you will get Hilary or Obama. Romney can't beat them, but McCain can (this will be proven after Super Tuesday) The time to decide is at hand.
John Mccain is absolutely right! Why do conservatives despise him so much? Mccain should have won in 2000, we would be in a much better place today if that happened! And if he gets the nomination in 2008 I will vote for him!
Hey Mark, nobody cares about your book or your stupid dead dog you bald cumstain. Like most right wing talk show hosts,you talk over people,cut them off,or put on dopes from the other side of the debate.
Brainwashed NEOCON FOLLOWERS: Send your kids to fight in Iraq, to Iran, and Syria. My brother is a Marine, and the war is a fraud. He's a fraud and are chicken hawks, his and your cherries for the most part have never been poped. I'll tell ya what I'll pop your cherries. Any Neocon, POW right on the nose. War Mongers can't even punch yourself out of wet paper bag. NEOCONs, I predict won't be able to show their faces in public. The time is nigh.
Who is John "McLain" This hippie bastard dosnt eve know his name. John McCain is a man of the higest integrity. The guy spent 5 years in a vitenameese tourture camp. I think I wouldnt mind a guy with that kind of intestinal fortitude running our country! Vote McCain
John Mclain is the guy from Die Hard! I dont think Levin is that quick. Im pretty conservative but leaning to the left is not a bad thing. Any Person worth a damn makes his mind up on an issue by issue basis be it republican or democrat. Strictly taking sides based on party affiliation is what is wrong with government today and is rampant in congress not to mention stupid. I want a president who a leader not a sheep!
Levin is ideologically frozen into a hateful and bombastic closet. Open your eyes and stop slingin mud at those who are so much smarted than you jerk!
Hateful? Mud slinging? Cant stand to hear the truth? While there are some who want to eventually put every American, including you in a position that they control your every move! So we all have to answer to them and give them every last cent we make so they can give it to all those people to lazy to support them selves. They are so smart the have pulled the wool over your eyes perfectly. Thats why you have a problem with Mark Levin.
The great one? There is nothing great about Levin.
George Washington, was a great American, as were Abraham Lincoln and General Patton.
Levin, is not such a great American. He isn't even a good American. He is just loudmouth with a radio show.
surfn123 9 months ago
is there any pictures of him with hair?
thebackbencher666 1 year ago
McClain? This asshole doesn't even know how to speak correctly. What an Ignorant asshole doesn't even know the right way to pronounce it.
piontro 1 year ago
@piontro he says mcLAME...learn to hear
fbi10 1 year ago
mclame LMAO.
gmdude91 1 year ago
Every time Mark Levin tells a lie he loses another hair. McCain would kick Levin's fat little ass with one hand tied behind him.
AtlasShruggery 1 year ago
@AtlasShruggery mcain did not mcains father help cover up the USS liberty attack?
optionsupdate 7 months ago
Wow if this is not an act, this guy is going to die of a stroke soon- what an angry, hateful little man! Until I saw his picture, I envisioned him as an ugly little troll.
noreast77 1 year ago
McLame = perfect name for the progressive!
borntobewilder9 1 year ago 2
For a conservative, McCain is a disgrace !
He'de sell out and was mostly a liberal in rebublicans clothing. He sided mostly with the dems. AND I VOTED FOR HIM ! I DIDNT WANT HIM...BUT WHATS THE ALTERNATIVE..OBAMA ? Someone read LIBERTY AND TYRANNY and find out something about our constitution. Dont be uninformed like most "PROGRESSIVES." and of course I know some Progressive libs with reply with a very angry, demeaning response.
sejrec56 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Levin is a racist pig.......
salbella50 2 years ago
@salbella50 I'd be interested to learn more about Levin's racism. Do you know of any quotes or some kind of evidence?
cskillet2003 1 year ago
@skillet 2003 ...the constitution is frauded, it has a bunch of redneck in it....
ptmacman9 1 year ago
@ptmacman9 Now there's a convincing argument!
cskillet2003 1 year ago
There is EVERYTHING wrong with BOTH of those puppet sell outs.
espada9 2 years ago
i voted libertarian this time, not republican... i hated mccain beyond belief.
TijuanaOldie 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
news flash: The UNITED STATES WAS NOT FOUNDED BY CHRISTIANS. Our founding fathers were DEISTS. This idiot Levin is wrong when he says our constitution was founded on judeo-christian values. And he lies about nearly every thing else. This guys is a disgrace to our nation.
dumballover123 2 years ago
Sounds like a good reason to preserve individual liberty
thtrgremlin 2 years ago
Seriously - what's wrong with this guy's voice?
VanDoodah 2 years ago
VanDoodah, you should listen to the content not his voice. He is smarter than you and wrote top-selling book fool! Stop that childish crap!
avaikiconnection 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Mark Levin is a piece of shit of midget who sounds like Joe Pesci on helium. He is hated by true conservative like Dr. Savage.
Its just funny hearing him getting pissed off at his callers like some old woman who got her purse snatched from her.
BibleBeatingRepub 2 years ago
timmyblaze - he is saying McLAME.
WeekendWarrior1210 2 years ago 2
The guy can't even pronounce the war hero's name right. McClain? Jesus. Where was this phony during Vietnam?
timmyblaze 2 years ago
He said John McLame, its a stupid joke.
jacobins3000 2 years ago 4
Mark Levin speaks of truth and wisdom, while you idiot liberals speaks of deception and destruction. You liberals are the economic parasites of society, you keep on attacking conservatives who made this country great yet you always took advantage of them, what a weird mentality by these liberals.
tomcatjeff1985 2 years ago 3
He sounds like a squeeky voice dwarf. How the hell did he ever get into hate radio sounding like a pussy?
khackney 2 years ago
Is that the excuse you use to support a tall, good looking, well spoken president that would enslave you and your children? You want to bring back The Great Vimar Republic, but only under the condition that the leader have better looking hair? (What's his name did have the worst comb over in HISTORY.)
thtrgremlin 2 years ago 3
The true "liberal" seeks understanding and humanity at all costs for all people. The true "conservative" believes in his innate superiority to all other cultures and institutions, and feels justified in defending his land by any means necessary, and the enrichment of his own self at all costs. In this sense, there is greater similiarity to the Taliban and Mark Levin.
jimlovesearth2 2 years ago
this man, Mark levin, is so full of hate.. You can see it in his eyes...
this man is an affront to all that is precious about life... he is the antithesis of freedom, life, and liberty. This guy is pathetic.
jimlovesearth2 2 years ago
a typical mark levin listener...
PsychoPunk1965 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
levin is a fascist, statist, elitist, and moron.
jimlovesearth2 2 years ago
Those seem to be big words there; did you copy and paste them from somewhere. And if you're using them to defend McCain or Obama, then one thing is clear: you're certainly no political scientist. ;)
blogbat 2 years ago
He didn't have a choice? What about the libertarian or the other independents? He was a big time hypocrites. I saw him praise the man, and stop calling him "Mclame" for awhile. After he lost, he went back to his foolishness. Levin is a tool partisan hack.
Superplatanoman 2 years ago
Then, he loved him when he was the gop candidate. Hypocrite!
Superplatanoman 2 years ago
No they didn't you fool. You should of maybe listened to him during the campaign.
iiiiihexiiiii 2 years ago 2
Yeah... He wanted Mccain to win.
Superplatanoman 2 years ago
It was more that he wanted Obama to lose. If you ever listened to his show (or pretty much any conservative show) you would of known that.
iiiiihexiiiii 2 years ago 4
Yes, I know he's a conservative nut. But, he did want Mccain to win. This rant makes him a hypocrite.
Superplatanoman 2 years ago
First off, this "rant" was made in 2006. Second of all, he only wanted McCain to win because he knew how horrible Obama was going to be.
Again, you are wrong.
iiiiihexiiiii 2 years ago 3
No it doesn't; it makes him a pragmatist. For hypocrisy, you need look no further than Barack Obama: a walking, breathing, barely thinking testament to very institutionalization of it. "Americans must conserve" as he adjusts his thermostat to his unusual comfort level; "Don't go to Las Vegas, that's MY job"; "we should all drive tiny, unsafe cars. Well, by 'we', I mean you..." ;) Yep, Fine fellow there.
blogbat 2 years ago 2
A pragmatist? Sure. He's a big hack.
Superplatanoman 2 years ago
How often have you listened to his show? A big hack doesn't buckle down and support a guy he can't stand because it's better than the alternative. As for choosing a third party candidate last election, that's a little like people who drive the Prius: they don't do it because it really makes a difference; they do it so they can feel morally superior and for no good reason. Moral superiority doesnt really equal political autism. :)
blogbat 2 years ago
I suggest you read a little chomsky or michio kaku or thom hartman. All 3 men are far more brilliant and humane than Levin, who is blinded by his own prejudices. Here's another one for you. "3 cups of tea" by Greg Mortenson. An inspiring story of a true humanitarian.
If we're really interested in liberating people and protecting ourselves, there are more effective and humane ways of doing so then endless war. Even a fool understands that war begets more war.
jimlovesearth2 2 years ago
Agreed. Levin tries to pose himself as some kind of "moral" guy, and he uses pejoratives against every guy he ever talks to
VBackseatRomeoV 2 years ago
@blogbat Good point: Hitler made the energy efficient VW for the masses. Obama wants smart cars (energy efficient) for the masses.
vintagevic1 1 year ago
Can you do the world a favor? Get into a car, and drive it really really fast into a cement wall. Trust me, you won't feel a thing if you do it right.
Templar777 3 years ago
What the hell is wrong with you people? You will vote for a goon that promises to take money from your fellow citizens to fund the taking of life in the womb, the most precious and innocent, but you abhore Mark Levin. How can you vote for a subsistent living at the expense of the working man when your small check that barely gets you by promises to rape the working man's future, while the politicians fly around in private jets with escort hotties? Stop being a bunch of mislead fools!
fishguru73 3 years ago
Levin is bi-polar, at best. He needs medication
aFlyInDaOintment 3 years ago
This man is fucking crazy, stupid, irrational and dumb.
Whoever listens to this guy is either stupid or crazy.
MACKATTACK1970 3 years ago
Wow! Crazy, stupid, and dumb. You are a literary genious. We should discount this man's statements and bow at your feet. Then we can be sane, reasonable, and smart. Jesus should ask you for an autograph. You are a fool and the truth is not in you. You hate what is right and speak evil against all who practice moral living and teaching. Obama just raped your future for another 1.2 trillion dollars to the deficite and you are criticizing this man?" You are a a complete idiot!
fishguru73 3 years ago
lol, Mackattack
My interpretation is that many of Levin's listeners certainly suffer from low self-esteem... how else can they go around calling this little pos "great one"
aFlyInDaOintment 3 years ago
this guy is crazy. i wish he'd calm the fuck down.
thedaddy9000 3 years ago
Mark was right about him. He called it along time ago.
logalogalog 3 years ago
500 dollars a barrel for oil, well you aren't that good at seeing 2 months into the future, considering gasoline is 1.70 a gallon.
yoyohihiyohi 3 years ago
And unlike John McCain, Reagan learned what a failed approach to government that was.
blogbat 3 years ago
You linked to my video. Just curious who you are?
1isaM111er 3 years ago
levin is absolutely no Reagan. levin is a little poop in a big toilet, hoping not to get seen or flushed. He's looking to make some dollars off of sponsorship if his crap of his takes off. He's just a loser... let it go
aFlyInDaOintment 3 years ago
TRAITOR!!
enchantez 3 years ago
enchantez, yeah, levin is a fool. He's also a zionist, killed Jesus
aFlyInDaOintment 3 years ago
No, Jesus laid down his own life willingly out of love for all people you liar! Your lies flow straight from the mouth of satan himself. You dare to use the name of the son of the most high to condemn when he came to save? You are an abomination full of contempt for your fellow man and devoid of truth! Mark Levin is a good man who rejects the idea that intellectuals in positions of authority have absolute wisdom and power over the common man. He is on your side you idiot!
fishguru73 3 years ago
And now he's promoting John McCain... LOL goes to show that its the people above these hosts who are paying them to say all this... I bet "the great one" wouldn't be talking like this now WTF... This nut job is so loud and angry, I'm surprised anyone listens. He actually makes Limbaugh look like a teddy bear.
kateslateforever2 3 years ago
how did this boob ever get a radio show
the moron can't even pronounce the guy's name
jjaniero 3 years ago
I believe this essentially makes my point. It is undeniable our economy has slowed over the last few years, particularly for most Americans, as the dollar fell and the price of gas shot up along with ancillary prices. Curiously, the worst of this has been seen since Democrats took back the Congress in 2006. Nevertheless, things are not nearly as horrific as the Obama camp prefers to portray; by his account we are reliving the Great Depression.
blogbat 3 years ago
Interesting post; however, it offers very little to the discussion. Per chance might you spare everyone the bloviating as well as your own insults - impersonal or personal - and provide something a little more substantive. As crass and as incorrect as my other commenter below is, at least he proffered a point.
blogbat 3 years ago
The only jobs Bill Clinton created were ones directly under his control in the Federal government, but Congress still had to allocate the funds. At least for the paying jobs. Interesting your choice of expletive, since that segues nicely into the other type Clinton created. As far as private sector employment, Clinton simply went along with Congress to get government out of the way of people so they could do their thing.
blogbat 3 years ago
Nope. The Bush administration for the most part, continued on with Clinton's policies, and in many areas expanded them and caused even more bloat and wasteful spending. The difference between then and now is in the Congress, when Conservatives gave way to the Rockefeller Republicans around 2000, who worked with the libs to screw every one of us over.
blogbat 3 years ago
I suppose that's why the church of Obama has been a member for over 20 years actually has written into its philosophy that members shun all things middle class. Look it up. At any rate, I really hate to break it to you, but Obama and Bush are not so fundamentally different, apart from rhetheric, of course. Don't be such a sheep, my friend. :) As for voting records, Obama, when he votes, votes partisan 100% of the time. Obama has done nothing for you in the Senate...when he shows up.
blogbat 3 years ago
Nope, just another realist. Between McCain and Obama McCain is the best choice, especially now that Palin's on the ticket. It's what we rational people do, Dewy; you libs should try it sometime. Unlike Obama, we can actually change our view based on a re-evaluation of the available data without melting down into a shaking glob of insecure emotional breakdown, curling up in the corner in the fetal position. ;)
blogbat 3 years ago
Oh yes! As awesome as when Newt was speaker of the House! Good days economically, indeed! Now, as for the Oral Office, I doubt you really mean that. Perjury aside, WJC's part in creating a Chinese monster capable of nuking us all to high heaven militarily and economically and the alienation of post-Soviet Afghanis will be (and have been) haunting us in the most tragic ways.
blogbat 3 years ago
Oh yes, those terrorist women and children Saddam killed. I think we all remember those. Granted, Bush tends to chronic dishonesty and I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him, which is why he and Obama would get along just fine.
blogbat 3 years ago
This war is not unconstitutional, nor is it illegal. Instead of throwing around those terms since you hear other liberals use it, and you like to regurgitate it, why don't you cite the specific law, or part of the constitution that has been violated? Until then, shut the hell up.
DCussen 3 years ago
"Authorization.--The President is authorized to use the Armed
Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and
appropriate in order to--
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq."
I'm so tired of you know-nothing 20 year olds posting these pure lies.
You are an unpatriotic traitor. How does it feel?
Minionuup 3 years ago
Mark Levine is one of those idiots that keep trying to repackage and resell the Iraq war to the gullible. There is nothing conservative about waging war in Iraq and there is nothing unpatriotic about being against the war. Where do these jerkoffs get this from?
warrior350es 3 years ago
That sounds like a fine and well-thought out, original, and quite clever argument, warrior; except that none of it is true. Even top Dems have conceded Iraq has turned around. Perhaps you need to come join us in the present day and put down your Obama Kool-Aid.
blogbat 3 years ago
Well I hate Obama and I hate the Democratic and Republican parties. I would rather join the good old fashioned American way which is peace and prosperity, that is what America is really about or should be about if the founding father's influence had any meaning in the present day.
warrior350es 3 years ago
Also wasn't the war on terror supposedly waged against the number 1 terrorist Osama bin Laden? Well where is Mr. bin Laden? I'll tell you where he is, he's having lobster tails in Kennebunkport, Maine with the Bushes. This country cannot afford to keep borrowing money to wage war and rebuild countries, it needs to be spent here. Get rid of the neocons and the neoliberals and get some people in there that have this country's interest in mind instead of their own perks.
warrior350es 3 years ago
Well, I doubt the statement "I'll tell you where he is, he's having lobster tails in Kennebunkport, Maine with the Bushes" will win anyone over; because it is a rediculous thing to say. I agree with you about the neocons and neolibs 100%; however, while the war is not as simplistic as either of them say it is, it is neccesary for a simple reason: if we do not protect our interests abroad, we will be cleaning up after the terrorists here.
blogbat 3 years ago
Just because the mayor is corrupt, doesn't mean there are no crooks on the streets to clean up. Getting rid of the mayor and hiding our heads in the sand will do nothing for America's long-term survival.
blogbat 3 years ago
Wouldn't the simple thing be to increase border security here? It sure would cost a lot less than this war does. And the comment I made about bin Laden and the Bushes isn't really all that ridiculous when you consider that the media no longer talks about bin Laden, he's never mentioned by Bush in any of his speeches. The simple fact is that they don't want bin Laden. There should never have been an invasion of Iraq, it's costing 400 million dollars a day to keep this up.
warrior350es 3 years ago
There is no incentive for the new Iraqi government to take over the security of their own nation while American forces are there. We simply cannot afford to keep doing this sort of thing. Are we going to continue to borrow money from China? This is ridiculous. Look at the price of gas and other goods in this country, look at the slump in the economy. Do you not see the correlation here? We prop dictators up then we become enemies with them, we can't keep doing this.
warrior350es 3 years ago
Spell check (warrior350es) you idiot! Warrior you're just another drone worthless Liberal socialist!
Johnny4787 3 years ago
You're right, there is nothing unpatriotic about opposing the war. Just thank the soldiers for giving you that right. Also, Iraq was just as much about compassion to the people of Iraq than WMDs. Sadaam was a tyrant that needed to be taken out. Other people we should help are in Burma, Darfur, and numerous other places.
Denuba90 3 years ago
I wonder what Mark Levin stands for now that McCain is the "presumptive nominee". Will he eat his values to vote for lesser of two evils or will he be principled and continue to protest the election.
banemaler 3 years ago
Washington com-Post. Great line! Her Thighness. Painfully true. Meet the dePressed! Come to think of it, quite true. deFace the Nation. 'love it!
fieryman1 3 years ago
ha ha ha... back to 1974 sad butt true. Maybe if i click my manly heels ( he he he) and say there's no one like conservative's this will all be just a nightmare. Oh well one can.. HOPE smile.
computerpurple 3 years ago
I'm a traitorous scumbag lib myself. I might even vote for John Mccain. I hope levin and his fan base hate my guts. I'd even be willing to go on his show and get him all worked up and pissed off at me.
ffairlane57 3 years ago
LOL, at least you don't take yourself too seriously, unlike all three of our fine candidates. :p
blogbat 3 years ago
I'll hold my nose and vote for mccain. He was NOT my first pick , that went to Rick Santorum when he was a no show to run i then went for Fred Thompson. mccain is better sort of than hillary or b. hussein obama.
computerpurple 3 years ago
I hear ya. McCain was my absolute last choice. Well, actually, that was the whack job Ron Paul (lol that my two last choices in the Republican party were a nazi and a liberal). Either way though, we're back in 1974 with Gerald Ford whether we like it or not.
blogbat 3 years ago
A Nazi and Liberal, interesting that you'd choose those two, I'm curious how you came up with such an ill informed description of such. Nazi's took away rights and promoted aggressive war while liberals like socialists have slowly eroded our economic freedoms and in the case of illegal immigration, our security. I'm curious for you to clarify how these describe either McCain or Paul.
banemaler 3 years ago
Twits like davis with the "be nice" nonsense is what has brought the politcal process to its current state. Nasty, rotten, name calling politcal speech is a time honored tradition, going back to Greece and Rome. Also have you ever watched a meeting of Parliment? It makes the stuff Mark says look like Sesame Street. Please unclench the over tight ass and relax. P.S. I ROLL when he calls her "her thighness" and Barack "Millhouse" Obama...lol
beak1972 3 years ago
So true. People who wish to squash passionate dialogue are secretly hoping the public gets bored and goes away as pointy heads try to out-drone each other with dry policy minutia, instead of frying the biggest fish that need it the most. How about a candidate who hears the people (re borders, freedom of speech, etc.). Way more important to America than whether a politician's feelings get hurt.
blogbat 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is the kind of nut Levine is. "John McClain"? You're very intelligent Levin. When you disagree with anyone, just change their name. He call's Hillary "Her Thighness" listen Levern, as people age, generally they do put on weight. We all can't be slim Leverns. I'm sick and tired of all these skunks screaming about one think or another. Levern, Limbaugh, Coulter, and Olberman, please note, your rocket ship is departing. None of them can begin with "I disagree with (name) and here is why.."
davisracquet 3 years ago
"Levern"? You must be very intelligent, too, davisracquet. If you had actually listened to the clip, you would have noted Levin gave a number of reasons for why he disagrees with McCain. Then again, that's probably why he is considered one of America's top constitutional lawyers and you're not, my friend. Thanks for playing. ;)
blogbat 3 years ago
After constantly attacking McCain for several months I've come to the conclusion that Levin is a weasel man.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
Yes, how dare those weasels report on McCain's voting record for what it is. Shame, shame, shame.
blogbat 3 years ago
man I've always wanted to know what this subhuman piece of shit levin looked like. The only exposure I have with him is hearing his fascist tirades on hate radio.
mizilus 3 years ago
*snickers*
After the Democrat convention, I'll show you what I mean.
(Me and Limbaugh are going to have the time of our lives watching it.)
GalacticKnight 3 years ago 2
No, he is not singing McLame's praises. He just happens to be right about 1 thing. While Hillary and Obama are right about nothing.
Talk radio is irrelivent huh? Then why is Talk Radio to blame whenever socialism dem policies get the boot?
GalacticKnight 3 years ago 2
Mark, you are so intelligent! I swear, you're a genius!
GalacticKnight 4 years ago
John McAmnesty/McKennedy will never win the presidency, no matter what the Globalist, Open Borders, Amnesty, NAFTA, Fox News, CNN, etc.. supporters say, without a rigged election. He didn't have the support at the beginning of the year; financially or voter support, ex:laying of staff, until Amnesty/ Open Borders Advocates and Lobbiest came to his rescue. Against 70-80% of the voting public who want borders closed??. And he won't have the Rep. conservative, MILITARY VOTE, either.
rob80nikki 4 years ago
But he will lie to the American people about shutting down the borders just like Bush did to win in 2004. McCain's about as conservative as Jimmy Carter.
blogbat 4 years ago
"McCain's about as conservative as Jimmy Carter."
In what way?
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
Aw c'mon Levin. Bush loves McCain. You should be happy that Lieberman is following MCcain around in the Middle East right now to keep him in a fresh change of diapers and coach him in the differencr between Extremists and Terrorists.
OMG, what a whiner. This is "the Great One?" ILMAO.
littlemisspissy 4 years ago
It is what it is, kombanos. It's also immature to begin your sentence without the proper capitalization, but with trolls and RINOs running amuck around here, I guess we can't be too picky. ;)
blogbat 4 years ago
It's part of his shtick-- no more no less.
baumsy18 4 years ago 2
Well, let's also cut spending something McCain wanted along with the tax cuts. Now, why do we have deficits compared to Clinton's time?
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
Sorry, His voting record is indefencible. Being a "MexiCain" supporter, it must be easy for you to cross party lines, as it were. It's easy for you to "give" here or there.
To me, some things are not on the negotiating table.
I predict that a large compliment of legit conservatives will block his chances of winning the general election.
By the way, if I vote for a candidate that is diameterically opposed to every core value I have, wouldn't I be just as guilty as McClame?
No thank you, sir
turntapzap 4 years ago
First, I didn't support McCain months ago b/c I don't like everything of him but he's more conservative OVERALL than the Dems, if you compare the voting records. To answer your question, sure, to some extent, but you're supposed to pick the BEST candidate to you, not the SAME candidate, in terms of core values. SOMETHING or NOTHING, my friend.
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
Respectfully, I disagree.
My honest sense after careful review is that there is little (if any) distinction between parties these days. Presidential candidates notwhitstanding. If we go to hell as a nation, better it be during the dems watch.
...Perhaps if he would admit his liberal proclivities, I could repect him enough to support him. But no, He is a liberal piece of shit flip flopper, to the degree that Obama seems less destructive. It's over for us conservatives. Period. Why give in?
turntapzap 4 years ago
"He is a liberal piece of shit flip flopper, to the degree that Obama seems less destructive."
Explain, please. Yes, I understand you have to be principled but not TOO principled, or else you won't get anything done, period.
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
My position is simple. I don't want anything MexiCain can accomplish. His accomplishments are antithetical to the republican platform. Better nothing should get done. Have you listened to this video? Levin puts forth my views elegantly.
My position is keep fighting for conservatism, or accept defeat graciously.
McCain thinks otherwise, and that's why he will lose the election. Even if he wins, we still lose. It's over for the time being.
turntapzap 4 years ago 3
OK, out of curiosity, who did you vote for before McCain got the nomination?
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
Romney
turntapzap 4 years ago
OK, so what makes Romney better than McCain? Is he more conservative? Is he more consistent than McCain? If that is so, there are YouTube videos on him flipflopping. From what I've observed, it seems the reason McCain won is because he flipflopped on fewer issues. Since conservatives like criticizing liberals on hypocrisy, that explains McCain's victory.
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
I take issue with your interpretation here. Society is moving further & further away from conservatism. There used to be a difference between the 2 parties. Not anymore. McCain wins because he's a liberal. That is the trend, and that's how people are voting these days. (Republicans lost both houses last elections) It sucks, but those are the breaks.
turntapzap 4 years ago
OK, but you did not answer my questions. Why do you like Romney so much?
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
Romney has only changed on Abortion and Gay rights. And they were not flip flopps, they were actually changing his mind. How do I know this? He only changed once. And he changed when poll numbers said he should stay on his current position.
McCain has flip-flopped on immigration. He was against the Bush tax cuts for the same reason the dems were against them. And on everything else, he's LIBERAL.
GalacticKnight 4 years ago
Wrong, he was against the tax cuts because he believed that addressing in cutting spending was important, something Bush hasn't done resulting in a deficit. You say he's a liberal but is he as liberal as Obama or Clinton? Give me some PROOF. BTW, where do you stand on Iraq, which is another important issue?
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
Oh, really?
watch?v=en0UsydYzSI
THERE is McCain's flip flop.
Allow me to list the most Liberal of McCain's policies.
McCainFeingold
McCainKennedyBush (I hate you for this, Bush)
Gang of Fourteen and Senate Fillibuster
Believes in Global Warming as a man made force...
Do I need to go on?
GalacticKnight 4 years ago
Maybe. So he flipflopped, but is he for tax increases? So you don't like where he stands on every issue but you did not answer my question of whether he is just as liberal as Obama (whom I think is going to win) and Hillary? Also, do you want withdraw from Iraq immediately? Can't get everything you want, sorry.
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
No, he is not as liberal as Obama. Obama and Hillary have betrayed this country, and McCain will never do that. Ever.
He WILL increase taxes, he was against them before, and I bet he'll increase them because he's a socialist.
The one, single thing that I agree with McCain on is the war in Iraq. I do not want withdrawl, I want victory.
I do not agree with him on Getmo. Those terrorists need to stay there so Liberal's can't get them out.
GalacticKnight 3 years ago
I guess you might as well go with McCain because at least you'll get SOMETHING rather than nothing.
unknownunknowns 3 years ago
But if he picks Romney or Condelezza Rice as VP, my worries will be over.
And yes, I might as well.
GalacticKnight 3 years ago
Romney, I can understand but Condi, I don't think so. Bush is already unpopular as it is, and picking her as VP will just decrease McCain's chances.
unknownunknowns 3 years ago
I take that back, I don't think Romney is a good idea due to his Mormonism.
unknownunknowns 3 years ago
You do realise you just offended the heck out of me. I'M Mormon. Religous Tolerance, anyone?
GalacticKnight 3 years ago
I'm sorry if I did but I thought one of the reason Romney didn't win was because of all this talk from evangelicals about his Mormonism. Anyway, religion should not be a main issue here.
unknownunknowns 3 years ago
Thank you. I did not mean to lash out, but the evangelicals are not a very large majority, to my knowledge. But I KNOW of some Evangelicals that were for Romney.
GalacticKnight 3 years ago
wow let me guess where you live, alabama, You are a stupid ass redneck. You want victory in iraq, do you have any idea what the fuck you are talking about. There is no winning, there is no reason for fighting, we went into iraq for no good reason( except for oil and bc GB senior couldnt catch Sadam). He used fear as his tactic for support saying that saddam has weapons of mass destruction, you want to know how many they have found so far ...0, go home, sit on the couch,eat corn and watch NASCAR
bholloway546 3 years ago
Okay, in order.
#1: Yes, try to grasp at straws, moron.
#2: McCain has no friggan idea what he's doing EXCEPT for the war. No economic, social clue.
#3: No, he told the truth about Saddam Hussien.
#4:The fact that a liberal is coming to his defense is PROOF that he is a nasty choice. Why is he our nominee? Because of Dem/Ind cross-over votes. Why are you pissed? Because we're using your own tactics against you.
My suggestion: Go back to China where you came from, you Lib!
GalacticKnight 3 years ago 4
Weak-minded. Stay away from voting if you have no intelligence. Reagan would not give up, why should you? Get a clue, kiddo. Look at McCains voting record.
turntapzap 4 years ago
Look at McCain's voting record...compared to Hillary's or Obama's.
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
Fuck that, I would rather die than vote for that piece of shit.
turntapzap 4 years ago
I should remind you should be voting for the BEST person, not the SAME person as your ideology.
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
For what? Will the country be better under Obama than McCain?
unknownunknowns 4 years ago
Levin you sound like a damn weasel. Just shut up and stop digging yourself into a hole.
Who cares about tax cuts when there are more important issues at stack here?
JohananRaatz 4 years ago
Your economy is going to hell in a handbasket, Tax cuts can indeed help save you along with cutting government spending so yah it is important, nice try though lefist...
rabrams420 4 years ago
But Romney is far worse than McCain. At least I can trust where McCain stands. Romney I can't trust any farther than I can throw him.
"Romney can win the general election. McCain cant."
No McCain can. Haven't you seen the polls between him and Hillary? He's on top and he has a very good chance.
JohananRaatz 4 years ago
I LOVE MARK.. but he does NOTHING to help us in the general election..
cdnerds 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld various anti-polygamy statues in the late 1800s, Romney's great-grandparents fled to Mexico so the men could bang multiple wives and "practice their religion." The family returned to the United States after Mitt's father was born. In summation: Mitt Romney's ancestors were horny polygamists, and his father was a Mexican immigrant.
Cassadine1966 4 years ago
Same thing happened in 96. GOPers pushed Dole, a super lame old fart.
Mark Levin didn't support Paul or the other conservatives. NOW he's complaining? Too late my friends.
coolmamac 4 years ago
Mark wasn't complaining then and he isn't complaining now. He is doing whatever he can to prevent McCain from receiving the Republican nomination because he has (as do I) legitimate objections to McCain. Mark did not support any of the nominees because there was not candidate that represented what he believes, which makes sense to me. Now those of us that object to McCain are doing what we can to defeat him. It's that simple.
alcarp 4 years ago
Who is Mark Levin?
PoliticoJake 4 years ago
Mark Levin is apparently someone you are unfamiliar with and someone you claim not to know. And yet for some reason you post a reply to a reply to a YouTube video of the person you've never heard of. I don't know what could be more pathetic.
alcarp 4 years ago
If you are a republican and don't support McCain to become the GOP nominee then you will get Hilary or Obama. Romney can't beat them, but McCain can (this will be proven after Super Tuesday) The time to decide is at hand.
Boinkity 4 years ago
Neocon rats.
chewbaca1989 4 years ago
John Mccain is absolutely right! Why do conservatives despise him so much? Mccain should have won in 2000, we would be in a much better place today if that happened! And if he gets the nomination in 2008 I will vote for him!
redgalaxy4 4 years ago
Look at his voting record and you'll see why everyone hates McCain. He's bush with a bald head
exacerbatedtaboo 4 years ago
McCain is a nut and creepy not to mention a bold face liar.
polidics 4 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Mark Levin is a creep and a nut.
redgalaxy4 4 years ago
Yeah, you're right. Our little lives are meaningless, so you should probably just go ahead and end yours.
agravlin 4 years ago
Hey Mark, nobody cares about your book or your stupid dead dog you bald cumstain. Like most right wing talk show hosts,you talk over people,cut them off,or put on dopes from the other side of the debate.
pacerjp 4 years ago
Further evidence that the Left is the most hate-filled group of animals in our society.
agravlin 4 years ago 2
I guess you never heard of Ann Coulter or Mark Savage
pacerjp 4 years ago
its mike savage dummy
intimber4 4 years ago
Big fucking deal asshole.Mike, Mark who gives a shit .
pacerjp 4 years ago
NIGH, you chicken hawks.
chewbaca1989 4 years ago
Brainwashed NEOCON FOLLOWERS: Send your kids to fight in Iraq, to Iran, and Syria. My brother is a Marine, and the war is a fraud. He's a fraud and are chicken hawks, his and your cherries for the most part have never been poped. I'll tell ya what I'll pop your cherries. Any Neocon, POW right on the nose. War Mongers can't even punch yourself out of wet paper bag. NEOCONs, I predict won't be able to show their faces in public. The time is nigh.
chewbaca1989 4 years ago
Who is John "McLain" This hippie bastard dosnt eve know his name. John McCain is a man of the higest integrity. The guy spent 5 years in a vitenameese tourture camp. I think I wouldnt mind a guy with that kind of intestinal fortitude running our country! Vote McCain
allaboutgq 4 years ago
Good for you Vote McCain!
YoungPolitician 4 years ago
It's "McLame", you idiot. He's just being clever. He may be a man of integrity, but as a politician, he leans far too left to run as a Republican.
agravlin 4 years ago 4
John Mclain is the guy from Die Hard! I dont think Levin is that quick. Im pretty conservative but leaning to the left is not a bad thing. Any Person worth a damn makes his mind up on an issue by issue basis be it republican or democrat. Strictly taking sides based on party affiliation is what is wrong with government today and is rampant in congress not to mention stupid. I want a president who a leader not a sheep!
allaboutgq 4 years ago
Why don't you lead the way? ;)
blogbat 4 years ago
Levin is ideologically frozen into a hateful and bombastic closet. Open your eyes and stop slingin mud at those who are so much smarted than you jerk!
mdraskovich 4 years ago
Hateful? Mud slinging? Cant stand to hear the truth? While there are some who want to eventually put every American, including you in a position that they control your every move! So we all have to answer to them and give them every last cent we make so they can give it to all those people to lazy to support them selves. They are so smart the have pulled the wool over your eyes perfectly. Thats why you have a problem with Mark Levin.
Give them Libs Hell Mark!!!
torgersonrx 4 years ago 3
MARK LEVIN KICKS ASS, Y'ALL!!!
ffairlane57 4 years ago 4
What this country needs is some GD solidarity right now.
Quit with the bipartisan BS and lets kick some a**.
rumhead666 4 years ago