95 Mustang 5.0 and Z3 M Coupe 4th gear ONLY, NOT racing

[hurleypunk182]

It looks like someone blew their load on your Mustang.

[Tymur1000]

Что за хуйня, если бы был мустанг с объемом 5.0 то бмв запах кондицата бы нюхала,проверенно на собственном опыте

[RideThePONYgt]

I have a 94 GT, most Mustangs are only fast if you make them fast.

[SteelBustingShooter]

Yep, Stang was sucking that year for a lack of HP.

Worst....my 96GT only came with 215? Had to buy a Cobra 32v 320hp engine to make up for chicken shit 4.6 power.

[556210]

totallythat is totally not fair lol. the mustang in 95 was the last year to use the 302 windsor which sucks ass i have a 95 f150 and it uses the 302 and it just sucks so bad the automatic version of my truck only has 195 horsepower the manual is 212 but still a 4.9 liter v8 should be pumping out some serious numbers

[UnsurpassedKnowledge]

These are the good M coupes....last two years u.s. models 01-02 hp increased from 240 to 315, this M's guna kill the stang. This is one sweet bmw!

[Blownpony01]

to clear shit up the 95 cobra had 240 at the crank and the gt had 215, and on the fox the 5.0 had 205 and the cobra had 235

[cricket553]

in 95 the curb weight of a mustang range is: 3,055-3,565 The M from what I found is 1399 kg (3084.3 lb). Now in 95 the HP of the 5.0 was 240. The M in 99 has 240 and a bump in hp in 01 with 315. So less weight, more top end, and more hp the M will win. From a dig with the tq the 5.0 makes the race will be a lot closer if not the 5.0 edging out, but if going long enough the M will pull out.

[262Blazer]

in 95 the horsepower was not 240 it hadnt been 240 since the 93 cobra.

it was more like 215

[krybolt]

It was 240 in the cobra.. It was about 215 in the regular GT's

[262Blazer]

yah but this is a gt he said they started at 240 no they started in the 5.0 at 215

[longbeachmustangkid]

the HP in the "95 was 225 at the flywheel...and 300ft/lb at the flywheel....

[262Blazer]

no the foxbody had 225 his had 215

[longbeachmustangkid]

naw son naw......1995 had 225......look it up....ask anyone who has owned a 1995 GT...including myself.....they had 225HP at the flywheel

[262Blazer]

yeah son yah.... 1995 had 215... i did look it up just now u look it up then show me a link to the site...you dont have to own a car to know how much hp it has.

[2004svtterminator]

@262Blazer 215

[Yahtzee302]

@262Blazer it was 225...I agree still lacking. But a beast with a set of gears and a whiney blower.

[whtbullitt]

the 1995 GT's had 215 hp, the 1995 cobras had 240. the 1987-1992 GT's were rated at 225, in 1993 ford lowered the rating to 205 all that changed was forged pistons to hyperceutic pistons. the 1993 cobras were rated at 235 hp.

and no v8 GT weighed as light as 3055, they were 3300+. my 1993 GT which was about equal weighed 3680 with me in it and 1/4 tank.

these are the correct hp figures btw, just setting the record straight.

[longbeachmustangkid]

You're wrong about the HP rating for the 1995 Mustang GT which is what is in this video....the 1995 Mustang GT has 225 HP at the flywheel..trust me I have one.....which means it has only about 180 to the wheels.....and it had 300Lb/ft of torque....at the flywheel which means it had about 265 to the wheels....and my convertible weighs 3,572lbs.....the coupes are maybe 150lbs lighter.....

[YoungRand]

i really dont think your losing 45 hp through your tranny and rear end

[longbeachmustangkid]

yeah im pretty sure you lose a good amount...MAYBE not 45hp but damn close.....

[YoungRand]

i thought it was more like 15-20

[gangfrog69]

@YoungRand , well its not just the tranny and rear end you got all the engine pullies for accerories, and its front enginr rear drive so you fot that big heavy driveshaft too and auto trannies usually steal more hp, so maybe arounf 45, my bro has a 2002 zo6 corvette, he was making 440 hp at the crank and like 390 at the wheels, so ya you do lose a bit of power through thedrivetrain

[llcoolc9]

no, the M is just faster, especially at higher rpms

[jmd11185]

did the 4th gear run out on the stang or what?

someone explain

[cricket553]

The m is lighter, and with that body, and the stock 5.0 it isn't fast at all. Also Mustangs have torque down low. That is why Mustangs are better from a dig on out.

[jmd11185]

are you sure the m is lighter. What is the weight on the mustang.