Peter Russell - Primacy of Conciousness (3 of 7)

[QuaziJack]

really? cool



[Liberum69]

Again, HOW DOES SOMEONE BECOME FAMOUS FROM THIS??? This is stuff I came up with in freakin' high school! The last parts better freakin' expand my damn theories or I'm completely off philosophy forever.

[ProcessedArt]

This guy is SO clearly behind the times in all of the amazing findings in science, physics, quantum mechanics, etc... they have been learning SO much about alternate realities. If he didn't spend so much time tearing other people and theories down, and did more research he would actually have something very important to say. But, right now he takes generalizations and states them as absolute truths. He makes a statement and then does not back it up but sidetracks the viewer with slander.

[ProcessedArt]

@ProcessedArt AND, more importantly, if you do your research you'll find that there is NO such thing as matter. Matter is simply an illusion. Keep going to the core of an atom and you will simply find energy. Everything is energy and the construct/illusion of matter is nothing more than a vehicle to filter our collective consciousness.  And, our collective consciously (energy) has a center, a source. Some call the source "God", or "The Great Spirit" etc... but there is only ONE source.

[livedandletdie]

I never knew Planck was that funny.

[Carolsw1]

I don't think we can assume that matter is completely insentient or unconscious. Perhaps we really just don't know how matter operates because it's beyond OUR level of consciousness just yet. The Heisenberg principle shows us that our conscious "light" can influence matter and scientific outcomes.

[tommytalks77]

Erm, but reincarnation and remote viewing have never been proved to actually occur, to be nothing more than myths. Yet. And I mean, be proved by actually being tested under strict, controlled conditions

.And "healing"? Oh come on, you really wanna start talking about "healing"? What's next, homepathy? Astrology? Tarot cards?

You lost a bit of my respect by bringing that up sir...

[kwakduckee]

This is real deep though. I like it.

[kwakduckee]

So we're in the first paradigm shift?

[HuckleberrySlim]

or the latest

[jojoisthebest]

wat do u mean by that?

[selvmordspilot]

@kwakduckee : no, there's been many, but some of them are ongoing processes. (they still argue over evolution theory in the US, for example); and they all build on one another. The kopernican revolution made the way for Nietzsches perspectivism and existentialism. Newtons mechanics made the way for Einsteins e=mc^2.

The next shift will accomodate and correct previous theories, like all the previousl.