All of the Powerful Photographers and the the Professionals in the world making use Canon... do the research nikon is not better than Canon Weboo15... Go check and Art Wolf, vincent laforet, Bambi Cantell.... NBA, NFL Tennis, Golf Baseball, also movie making are contact with Canon and use Canon... I respect Nikon and love Nikon too.... but let's Go Canon all day.... 5 MRK II, 7D, and the Mark series all on points...
@JayQown11 I have to comment on this because its just not true. Professionals use both systems and use them well. The sports illustrated photographers all switched to nikon when the d3 came out because of the issues with the mark3 from canon. The photographers you named are one thing but there a ton of photographers on nikons side as well as canon.
I was doing the horror movie thing, and talking to the display as I watched this. lol. But what I was hoping was to see you bump up the reds, to bring out some warmth on to the subject, and to really take advantage on the rusty bits of the car, ie the bulletholes. That's what made the picture intresting. Good job with the clarity-contrast combo.
hey jared how come you're against cropping? cropping small edges doesn't really lose quality, like nothing at all considering you're generally shooting with huge MP full frame bodies. can give a diff perspective on what was your original idea, and if your framing was slightly off because of rushing to get a shot in peak action, i reckon it's fine to do a little crop. and just like how you say you shoot raw to make tiny tweaks (eg half a stop of exposure off) or whatever, cropping can be the same
Jared, i know you dont like crop pictures, but whats your opinion about 16:9 aspect ratio? I like to use it, for example, when the subject is a car in a landscape. My photographer friends and the most people on photo forums say 3:2 or maybe 4:3 should be ideal for everything, and 16:9 is ridiculous for profressionals or even for the serious amateures like me. What do you think?
@justWatchin97 No. Photoshop is basically for very heavy image manipulation, and you can get I would say be more specific in the areas you want to adjust in photoshop. Both are powerful programs, I use both but prefer lightroom. What a lot of people I know do is use Lightroom for editing a photo, and photoshop for using said photo in a design or something. You'll be happy with either, but if you can just get both.
at 3:52 you noticed the chromatic aberration which is basically an issue caused by the lens not the sensor. It's commonly found in the zooms and less with the primes. Also, the wider the lens the more likely to get this color fragment. One good thing about the modern nikon DSLRs is that they automatically correct that issue in JPEG. Of course the raw files aren't corrected.
I think you could deal with that CA in lightroom in "lens correction" bar.
@lynchy8888 i recently had that problem, going onto the adobe site and downloading the newest update solved that for me. It also depends what camera you have, although most are supported now. Check out the adobe site, go to downloads, along the right hand side there is "product updates" download the Lightroom 3.3 and you should be good to go.
I don`t really like the image this week. Too flat... It is just a personal opinion. She looks like she was sleeping on that car and the photographer just woke her up for the shoot :P
But I like Greg`s edit (black and white). I really expected for a black and white from Jared
I have a question about the Nikon 85mm 1.4 and the Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 VRII.
A couple of people I know who own the 85 1.4 tell me that the majority of the time, they shoot it at 2.8 and above. That being the case, if a person tended to do that more often than not (and disregarding the weight issue) wouldn't the 70-200 be just as good at 85mm, but more versatile. It would be very interesting to see test shots of the same subject from both lenses at the same apertures.
Of course, I realise there's no beating the 85mm it for bokeh at 1.4, but if (like me) you couldn't afford to buy both lenses, and you had a tendency to shoot at 2.8 or above anyway, then is the image quality of the 70-200mm VR2 any worse at 85mm when the apertures are the same in real world use?
@tranquility789 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II is a special case where the optics are excellent throughout it's range. The canon version is slightly sharper still which is particularly spectacular. The only flaw with the 70-200 is the f/2.8. Both shot at 85mm f/2.8 - There would be no 'real world' difference. The 70-200 would benefit with the VR allowing you to shoot below 1/70th in very low light. The 85mm will benefit from the f/1.4 - also low light and greater bokeh.
@aadiflesher - thought so :o( another question if you don't mind. I'm shooting a Canon T2i and i just found out about recomposing my shot after focusing, and this has been causing me to miss my focus'. I'm pretty sure it has to do with the difference between single focus and continuous focus, but in the AF modes it only shows me Single shot, AI Servo and something else....does the single and continuous have to do with single shot vs rapid fire shots?
@Graffight When you want to recompose after focusing you have to be in single focus, not continuous.In continuous the camera will keep focusing and you will end up with the focus in a different spot than you want. Be sure the subject is not moving when recomposing and be sure not to change your plane, to far back or to much in front, especially with a 2,8 or wider aperture.
@Graffight just to finish up the question... There is no connection between single/continuous and single shot and rapid fire. You can put your camera in single focus and shoot single shot or rapid fire. Or or vice versa, put the camera in continuous focus and shoot single or rapid fire.
I hope that helped you! If you have any other questions feel free to ask :)
@weboo15 All of the Powerful Photographers and the the Professionals in the world making use Canon... do the research nikon is not better than Canon Weboo15... Go check and Art Wolf, vincent laforet, Bambi Cantell.... NBA, NFL Tennis, Golf Baseball, also movie making are contact with Canon and use Canon... I respect Nikon and love Nikon too.... but let's Go Canon all day.... 5 MRK II, 7D, and the Mark series all on points...
@lpogosov i had the same question the previous video :) apparently it takes time for youtube to propose all the different qualities. Make yourself a cup of coffee and when you come back the better qualities will be there
WOW bro amazing video quality! took me ages to load but thanks, excellent quality!
giallourosa 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great video, what program do you use to make this video(the screen capture part)?
ChrisInCali 6 months ago
Comment removed
ChrisInCali 6 months ago
Omg you crack me up when you say "Jared Polin...frooooo knowsss photo" you're crazy!
sajor10nemrac 7 months ago
Fro, edit your identity plate! :D
james07jamesjames 7 months ago
she looks like Ginny Weasley from harry potter
andrewnaylor08 7 months ago
All of the Powerful Photographers and the the Professionals in the world making use Canon... do the research nikon is not better than Canon Weboo15... Go check and Art Wolf, vincent laforet, Bambi Cantell.... NBA, NFL Tennis, Golf Baseball, also movie making are contact with Canon and use Canon... I respect Nikon and love Nikon too.... but let's Go Canon all day.... 5 MRK II, 7D, and the Mark series all on points...
JayQown11 8 months ago
@JayQown11 I have to comment on this because its just not true. Professionals use both systems and use them well. The sports illustrated photographers all switched to nikon when the d3 came out because of the issues with the mark3 from canon. The photographers you named are one thing but there a ton of photographers on nikons side as well as canon.
JaredPolin 8 months ago 16
@JayQown11 I use Canon 7D...hehe Canon is the best!!! ^^
paulosemifusa 7 months ago
@JayQown11 aww..its okay you dont know any better.
andrademeza 1 month ago
@JayQown11 wow your the biggest biased fan boy I have ever seen. your not a real photographer. Just a gear head. LOL!
xavierjohnwinston 1 month ago in playlist Let Us edit your RAW FILE
I like the black and white
thetechnoexpert 8 months ago
i like canon more
xIIIxViperxIIIx 10 months ago 2
I hate you.
Stevsta1213 10 months ago
I was doing the horror movie thing, and talking to the display as I watched this. lol. But what I was hoping was to see you bump up the reds, to bring out some warmth on to the subject, and to really take advantage on the rusty bits of the car, ie the bulletholes. That's what made the picture intresting. Good job with the clarity-contrast combo.
ZeroG84 11 months ago
I vote for Jared's
Also, when I view it in Aperture, it shows where the focus point was, and it was right on her right eye.
tmlim526 11 months ago
I vote for Jared's
tmlim526 11 months ago
1:08 LMAO
YouAreDead77 11 months ago 2
hey jared how come you're against cropping? cropping small edges doesn't really lose quality, like nothing at all considering you're generally shooting with huge MP full frame bodies. can give a diff perspective on what was your original idea, and if your framing was slightly off because of rushing to get a shot in peak action, i reckon it's fine to do a little crop. and just like how you say you shoot raw to make tiny tweaks (eg half a stop of exposure off) or whatever, cropping can be the same
tomfewchuk 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey jared! What about doing a review on Sigma 10-20mm! Thanks and thumbs up!
hilaryspiteri 11 months ago
hey jared! What about doing a review on Sigma 10-20mm! Thanks and thumbs up!
hilaryspiteri 11 months ago
Gregs Vampire Diary for me, never seen the show, but i like the look,
rich999uk 11 months ago
Jared, i know you dont like crop pictures, but whats your opinion about 16:9 aspect ratio? I like to use it, for example, when the subject is a car in a landscape. My photographer friends and the most people on photo forums say 3:2 or maybe 4:3 should be ideal for everything, and 16:9 is ridiculous for profressionals or even for the serious amateures like me. What do you think?
krisi047 11 months ago
is lightroom pretty much the same as photoshop?
justWatchin97 11 months ago
@justWatchin97 No. Photoshop is basically for very heavy image manipulation, and you can get I would say be more specific in the areas you want to adjust in photoshop. Both are powerful programs, I use both but prefer lightroom. What a lot of people I know do is use Lightroom for editing a photo, and photoshop for using said photo in a design or something. You'll be happy with either, but if you can just get both.
Whatisright 11 months ago
@Whatisright thanks mate
justWatchin97 11 months ago
Love you video's. So helpful and easy to watch. I love your process on editing pictures and showing the viewer what you do to get the results.
Many Kudos
KingTrigger999 11 months ago
Greg desaturated FTW. Haha
gwmills94 11 months ago
@justineatonphoto good luck have fun with it!!!
JaredPolin 11 months ago
I really like Greg's edits!
toyangel1 11 months ago
Greg's color edit looks the best to me.
MrCronyn 11 months ago
i want to find the guy that made the standard 8x10 frame and punch him in the face
3guys1girlandfetus 11 months ago 5
@3guys1girlandfetus ha, i agree.
JaredPolin 11 months ago
Excellent job as always Jared!!! The photo student at our school love you man.
RLJSlick 11 months ago
@RLJSlick what school is that, shoot me an e mail please id like to hear more.
JaredPolin 11 months ago
Do you guys look at all the edits on the forums?
iamravenous 11 months ago
@iamravenous yes we do.
JaredPolin 11 months ago
@JaredPolin Good to hear. I'll be uploading my edit after work today. Thanks!
iamravenous 11 months ago
you didn't completely massacre the blacks this week! good on you :P
ecyor7 11 months ago
hey jared! how do you upload photos to the FROrum ? :D
IDAlecious 11 months ago
@IDAlecious there is a how to guide in the forum for putting up photos. I like putting them in flickr its much easier to post on the forum that way.
JaredPolin 11 months ago
if u make the tone curve s shaped it will look as if u raised the contrast. if u do that with the contrast slider maxed u will turn it to 11
the6infernal9 11 months ago 2
@the6infernal9 sweet thanks
JaredPolin 11 months ago
bb guns? more like a shotgun lol :)
TheMoo1231 11 months ago 3
@TheMoo1231 shows what i know right.
JaredPolin 11 months ago
@JaredPolin :)
TheMoo1231 11 months ago
I like adding vignetting too. A bit.
M3mPHiS 11 months ago
Am I stupid or wth do you DL the RAW file?
osirful 11 months ago
@osirful The RAW file is available on the Fro Knows Photo forum.
trmania 11 months ago
Jared,
at 3:52 you noticed the chromatic aberration which is basically an issue caused by the lens not the sensor. It's commonly found in the zooms and less with the primes. Also, the wider the lens the more likely to get this color fragment. One good thing about the modern nikon DSLRs is that they automatically correct that issue in JPEG. Of course the raw files aren't corrected.
I think you could deal with that CA in lightroom in "lens correction" bar.
hisham202 11 months ago
@hisham202 yea,
JaredPolin 11 months ago
black and white looks best, gregs first one looks awful imo, too overexposed
AxCYeR 11 months ago
Jared, when you compare the edits at the end of the videos, can you also include the original?
AnimeEd 11 months ago
@AnimeEd i dont get the original from the photographer so that we are not swayed one way or another.
JaredPolin 11 months ago
@JaredPolin Sorry, I meant the unedited version, not the original edit.
AnimeEd 11 months ago
I can't watch any videos on youtube. They all keep freezing even on 360p!!!
Come on youtube, fix your site!!
TheNeonWorm 11 months ago
Lol @ 4:47
Jamicron 11 months ago 33
@Jamicron LOL!
iamravenous 11 months ago
@Jamicron this is amazing!
weboo15 11 months ago
it's just standart, lesscoloured and black and white...
wow
MrTomMasterVideos 11 months ago
I forgot to add. Can you remove tetanus in Lightroom or is that a separate plug-in?
ForSquirrel 11 months ago
Greg's edit this week.Then again I just really like monochrome stuff.
ForSquirrel 11 months ago
it wont let me put CR2 files into light room 3, what do i do?
lynchy8888 11 months ago
@lynchy8888 i recently had that problem, going onto the adobe site and downloading the newest update solved that for me. It also depends what camera you have, although most are supported now. Check out the adobe site, go to downloads, along the right hand side there is "product updates" download the Lightroom 3.3 and you should be good to go.
chaseMiles86 11 months ago
@lynchy8888 try downloading Adobe DNG converter.
jjjjjokerface 11 months ago
you are mr. filllight!
maxthesseling 11 months ago
all very nice edits!
nwarken 11 months ago
I prefer Greg's edit (The non-B&W one)
Xera1 11 months ago
with your overcontrast, she looks 10 years older
Sinwori 11 months ago
I don`t really like the image this week. Too flat... It is just a personal opinion. She looks like she was sleeping on that car and the photographer just woke her up for the shoot :P
But I like Greg`s edit (black and white). I really expected for a black and white from Jared
aadiflesher 11 months ago
Great video! Thanks Jared.
I have a question about the Nikon 85mm 1.4 and the Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 VRII.
A couple of people I know who own the 85 1.4 tell me that the majority of the time, they shoot it at 2.8 and above. That being the case, if a person tended to do that more often than not (and disregarding the weight issue) wouldn't the 70-200 be just as good at 85mm, but more versatile. It would be very interesting to see test shots of the same subject from both lenses at the same apertures.
tranquility789 11 months ago
Of course, I realise there's no beating the 85mm it for bokeh at 1.4, but if (like me) you couldn't afford to buy both lenses, and you had a tendency to shoot at 2.8 or above anyway, then is the image quality of the 70-200mm VR2 any worse at 85mm when the apertures are the same in real world use?
tranquility789 11 months ago
@tranquility789 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II is a special case where the optics are excellent throughout it's range. The canon version is slightly sharper still which is particularly spectacular. The only flaw with the 70-200 is the f/2.8. Both shot at 85mm f/2.8 - There would be no 'real world' difference. The 70-200 would benefit with the VR allowing you to shoot below 1/70th in very low light. The 85mm will benefit from the f/1.4 - also low light and greater bokeh.
alipaulphotography 11 months ago
@alipaulphotography Thank you for the great info and fast reply, alipaulphotography. I appreciate that.
tranquility789 11 months ago
how do you make the camera information appear in the top left corner?:)
sebastianzebb 11 months ago
if you miss a focus on the eye, is there a way to fix that at all?
Graffight 11 months ago
@Graffight if you miss the focus there is no way to repair that. You can try with clarity but it is not gonna do you any good.
aadiflesher 11 months ago
@aadiflesher - thought so :o( another question if you don't mind. I'm shooting a Canon T2i and i just found out about recomposing my shot after focusing, and this has been causing me to miss my focus'. I'm pretty sure it has to do with the difference between single focus and continuous focus, but in the AF modes it only shows me Single shot, AI Servo and something else....does the single and continuous have to do with single shot vs rapid fire shots?
Graffight 11 months ago
@Graffight When you want to recompose after focusing you have to be in single focus, not continuous.In continuous the camera will keep focusing and you will end up with the focus in a different spot than you want. Be sure the subject is not moving when recomposing and be sure not to change your plane, to far back or to much in front, especially with a 2,8 or wider aperture.
aadiflesher 11 months ago
@Graffight just to finish up the question... There is no connection between single/continuous and single shot and rapid fire. You can put your camera in single focus and shoot single shot or rapid fire. Or or vice versa, put the camera in continuous focus and shoot single or rapid fire.
I hope that helped you! If you have any other questions feel free to ask :)
aadiflesher 11 months ago
just tell the viewers you dont like canon straight.
weboo15 11 months ago 27
Comment removed
aadiflesher 11 months ago
@weboo15 oh he can't say that cause canon viewers might probably go and watch stupid creative videos somewhere else
florinmldvn82ro 11 months ago
@weboo15 I don't like canon straight. LOL.
Any camera in the hands of someone who knows what they're doing is a good camera.
Nikon just happens to be better!! :D
NIKONGUY1960 10 months ago
@weboo15 All of the Powerful Photographers and the the Professionals in the world making use Canon... do the research nikon is not better than Canon Weboo15... Go check and Art Wolf, vincent laforet, Bambi Cantell.... NBA, NFL Tennis, Golf Baseball, also movie making are contact with Canon and use Canon... I respect Nikon and love Nikon too.... but let's Go Canon all day.... 5 MRK II, 7D, and the Mark series all on points...
JayQown11 8 months ago
why the quality is so bad?
lpogosov 11 months ago
@lpogosov i had the same question the previous video :) apparently it takes time for youtube to propose all the different qualities. Make yourself a cup of coffee and when you come back the better qualities will be there
parkthefrog 11 months ago
@parkthefrog thanks, now i undertstand))
lpogosov 11 months ago
@parkthefrog yap. It takes up to an hour sometimes.
aadiflesher 11 months ago
@lpogosov just wait to process, mate!!
aadiflesher 11 months ago
nice! thank you.
alexutzro13 11 months ago