ok so i think u wen about this arguement all wrong... there are different classes of zombies... the insanely fast ones from 28 days/weeks later... those would deff own vampires...they freckin sprint tirelessly making the "hoard" a lot more dangerous... vampires can only fight during night... disadvantage!!! they need blood to survive so if the bite a zombie u now have a zom'pire... again love ya vids...
@cryanjohnson uh dude the best example ofa powerful zombie is from 28 days later right yet their pretty much crazy people that dont feel pain or apparently get tired yet a vampire has super human strength/speed/CAN FLY/ and r smart not 2mention can turn into a huge monster bat! that being said alone the best example ofa vampire could beat a mob of zombies but vampires r very smart so they would team up 2 btw how would the zombies kill the vamps besides keeping them fighting till morning?
I would have to agree That Vampires trump zombies. I just have to point out thou; aren't they the same thing? both are undead with out a soul and have to get their sustains off the living? the real differences is vampires have class as well as brains.
Cherie this is amazing -- thank you! So I get your point (and the skit is hilarious), however, I want to point out one thing. Your zombies/rocks comparison is really interesting BUT rocks can't make more of themselves ... while zombies do that at a crazy rate. So zombies are not only as scary as rocks.
I'm glad you like it! :) And I see what you're saying about the rocks but actually, in some ways, rocks are more dangerous than zombies. Even if they can't replicate, there are more ways (flame thrower, cricket bat, etc) to protect your house from zombie mobs than there is to protect it from rock slides. But maybe there should still be homeowner's insurance for zombie mobs...
Wow! I love the vampire character. I can see why they are so good at luring victims to their untimely demise. But I think there's more than intelligence involved here. Vampires also have vampiness, a trait which is not exactly characteristic of real-life nerds. Why is my browser flagging the word vampiness? I guess it's a new word. I'd better trademark it. Vampires also have vampiness (TM). Now I can get rich off the royalties for my new creation.
Thanks, glad you liked it! :) How would you define "vampiness" though? I thought some people might say that nerds aren't as hot as vampires, but I would profoundly disagree on that. And how much do I have to pay in royalties when I use your word? ;)
Anyone else think that Zombies would win simply by infecting the vampire's food source?
No humans is bad for vampires, it's the difference between a battle and a war. You can win every battle and still lose.
Chijinko 1 year ago
ok so i think u wen about this arguement all wrong... there are different classes of zombies... the insanely fast ones from 28 days/weeks later... those would deff own vampires...they freckin sprint tirelessly making the "hoard" a lot more dangerous... vampires can only fight during night... disadvantage!!! they need blood to survive so if the bite a zombie u now have a zom'pire... again love ya vids...
Chris J
cryanjohnson 2 years ago
Fair point, but as I said, I'm doing classic zombies. People are always changing what zombies and vampires can do.
BelovedBitterSea 2 years ago
@cryanjohnson uh dude the best example ofa powerful zombie is from 28 days later right yet their pretty much crazy people that dont feel pain or apparently get tired yet a vampire has super human strength/speed/CAN FLY/ and r smart not 2mention can turn into a huge monster bat! that being said alone the best example ofa vampire could beat a mob of zombies but vampires r very smart so they would team up 2 btw how would the zombies kill the vamps besides keeping them fighting till morning?
PSBnNH 1 year ago
Zombies would murder vampires.
That is all.
Also, masonismal smells.
yourmumusername 2 years ago
I LOVE YOU
VAMPIRES ARE THE BEST
masonismail1994 2 years ago
I would have to agree That Vampires trump zombies. I just have to point out thou; aren't they the same thing? both are undead with out a soul and have to get their sustains off the living? the real differences is vampires have class as well as brains.
tarmel55 2 years ago
Cherie this is amazing -- thank you! So I get your point (and the skit is hilarious), however, I want to point out one thing. Your zombies/rocks comparison is really interesting BUT rocks can't make more of themselves ... while zombies do that at a crazy rate. So zombies are not only as scary as rocks.
But thank you Cherie for my decication video!
dannyco9 2 years ago
I'm glad you like it! :) And I see what you're saying about the rocks but actually, in some ways, rocks are more dangerous than zombies. Even if they can't replicate, there are more ways (flame thrower, cricket bat, etc) to protect your house from zombie mobs than there is to protect it from rock slides. But maybe there should still be homeowner's insurance for zombie mobs...
BelovedBitterSea 2 years ago
Wow! I love the vampire character. I can see why they are so good at luring victims to their untimely demise. But I think there's more than intelligence involved here. Vampires also have vampiness, a trait which is not exactly characteristic of real-life nerds. Why is my browser flagging the word vampiness? I guess it's a new word. I'd better trademark it. Vampires also have vampiness (TM). Now I can get rich off the royalties for my new creation.
saladuncle 2 years ago
Thanks, glad you liked it! :) How would you define "vampiness" though? I thought some people might say that nerds aren't as hot as vampires, but I would profoundly disagree on that. And how much do I have to pay in royalties when I use your word? ;)
BelovedBitterSea 2 years ago
Okay, now you're scaring me. I think I'd better just fade back into the woodwork. Bye.
saladuncle 2 years ago
Sorry...but I'm not sure what I said that was scary. :(
BelovedBitterSea 2 years ago
Wow, I didn't see that one coming. o_o
IronXKnight 2 years ago