currently, I am trying to translate Romans. from the Hebrew to the Latin through the Greek into English. it is amazing how many Hebrew idioms are so grotesquely translated into English from the Greek.
point: I have found that from Hebrew to English in the OT, that much of Hebrew seems/IS in double entendre, & marvelously the double entendre extends INTACT for the "paragraph", for the "chapter", even unto the whole book! Especially with the "minor prophets"
Could you please do Brad Scott's Biblical Hebrew series in their own playlist, just of this series? It's very hard to watch them in order this way! Thanks for sharing.
@dwalkerdon Old Hebrew is older than Aramaic I think, not sure, but Aramaic was used in New Testament times as well as Assyrian which is similar and Greek was the "educated" language, though Hebrew was still being used by the Jews I believe. I would think Latin was used by the Romans or one of the other languages of ancient Rome which I think died out even before Latin(possibly). Arabic came later and it is a Semitic language but a bit more indirectly...like east/west/southern Slavik languages
Just want to say I am an atheist and don't hate Christians or other religious people. The religious people I dislike, I would dislike even if they were also atheist. I have many atheist friends who are also like this. Please don't think that all atheists are haters and/or rude. :)
@EsheAhkura You can find "a source" to confirm ANY position. I left christianity because they had strong beliefs but no legitimate support for them. Some of their most important doctrines are based on less than clear verses which contradict very clear verses. You can BELIEVE the world is flat, but you cannot convincingly SUPPORT that belief. You can BELIEVE that you can change the Sabbath, but you cannot SUPPORT that. We would need that foretold by prophets and confirmation in the Tanakh.
@elskid206 Y'know all I really have to say is: Don't get it twisted... reality is not what it appears to be.
And the source is Jordan Maxwell. I don't think anyone can honestly debate his 50 years of research, unless of course they're a paid goverment individual or group... or maybe just an idiot. "Lord" (Lard) knows.
@EsheAhkura actually, Hebrew is the original language whereas all other languages, including Greek, are the result of Yahweh confounding the language so the people couldn't communicate with each other due to Nimrod's plan to build a tower to reach heaven.
@EsheAhkura let me say this last thing and I won't respond to any more of your comments. Nobody can ever accuse you of being a believer in Yahweh or Yahushua since the fruit you just displayed is reflective of the rebellious nature of Satan.
@davegooley Man... just shut the fuck up, about an Nibiruan extraterrestrial "god" (Yahweh), or a composite character (Jesus) and symbol for the Sun.
I got research and information from an E.T. contactee, that contradicts, the "official sanctioned version," of Rome... The Pope: The New Caesar of Saturnia (Rome).
"After the fall of Rome, the pope served as a source of authority and continuity." - Wikipedia, on the Pope.
@davegooley And "Satan" is actually Saturn. It amazes me how much people think they know, when in fact, they don't know. Go do your research. Find out where these words, terms and symbols actually come from. You'll be surprised.
Jordan Maxwell and Alex Collier's information is excellent! Most people just can't handle it, that's all....
@ChristianPainter I wear tzitzits for several reasons a) because Scripture tells us to b) our Messiah did (tzitzits are what the women with the "issue of blood" touched) c) they show that I believe in both the Father and the Son and observe the Torah. The Torah is "THE WORD" which was "made flesh. Our Messiah IS the Torah made flesh. The Tanakh (first five books of Scripture, Prophets, Psalms) is the authority which must confirm concepts from the apostolic writings (new testament).
@ChristianPainter The strongest piece of evidence that the Tanakh is the authority is Acts 17:11. Paul told the people of Berea "the gospel". In order to CONFIRM what he said, they checked the Tanakh. That means that the TANAKH is the superior authority, NOT anything Paul said. For example if Paul taught that the Sabbath could be changed, where in the Scriptures is that found? How could the Bereans CONFIRM what Paul said unless EVERYTHING he said was already in print in the Tanakh?
@ChristianPainter Brad considers himself a Messianic follower of Y'shua. Christianity has abandoned much of the Torah of Yahweh because of Roman Catholicism being the foundation thereof. It was at the reformation that much of Roman Catholicism was rejected while the annual traditions, based off of heathen practices, were retained.
I love this man, Jesus loved us he was an orthodox jew of 2012 over 2000 years ago. Listen to your hearts, I pray to you, i cheer to you, i cry for you, i laugh for you, i smile for you, i feel ashamed for you, my christ, my saviour, our love of god for he is our almighty raa of existence. Please listen to me people, 2012 is coming, David Wilcock from project camelot is coming. Rael, you are ours, kiss us and please lick my soul serpert of adam and eve.
@sagitarian000028 Shalom! Brad Scott is definitely not a "Christian apogologist" but Torah-obedient messianic believer in Yeshua HaMashiach. Christianity and judaism is not the answer because both of them has their roots in ancient Babel (confusion). The Living Torah is the answer. Both Judaism and Christianity have profaned the Torah of YHWH by their religious man-made rules and regulations. So who you are to comdemn this man? We should keep Yah's Word in our Focus, not men's religions.
@sagitarian000028 I have a question for you as an Jew (assuming you are). Is the concept that what happened to Abraham foreshadows what will happen to Israel valid? Is that something that the Orthodox believe and use to uncover more sod level understanding? If so, I would love to hear more examples from you. If so, do you also believe that what happened to Israel foreshadows what will happen to the world, on a world wide scale some day?
The nations who cling to Hashem and His Torah will be saved, about one third of this world population. The other two thirds will be killed in the final world war of Gog and Magog. We should all use our time wisely. See Ezekiel starting at 37, 38, 39 for more details. Read Zechariah 14: 12 - 14: 19 for further description of the plague and what the survivors will do.
@sagitarian000028 considering that "actual Jews" as in Orthodox Jews, have transgressed Deuteronomy 4:2 with their oral tradition, they are certainly not a source I would consider. Karaite Jews such as Nehemia Gordon would be someone I would ask about the ancient Hebrew Scriptures.
Your understanding level is lower than kindergarten, and you have tried to succeed at calculus, but failed. Without the "masorah" (oral Torah) one would not even be able to read the Hebrew bible or pronounce a single letter. Without the masorah, one would not know how to construct Tefilin or know what contents have to be placed inside. Without Masorah, one would not know how to slaughter an animal properly. And the references to the fact of oral teachings is contained in the text.
@72Yonatan nice condescending attitude you have there. I do agree that my level of understanding is less than basic as I am just learning. However, the "oral Torah", which includes the Talmud and other collections of understanding, have added to the commands of the Torah given by יהוה regarding what and how to observe. For example, the Torah of the Pharisees added more steps to the observance of the Sabbath that were never intended. This is what I was referring to.
Example of adding a command: "to make five tsitsiot instead of four." The Torah commands "corners" which are four corners for a standard garment. Perushim have not added and they have followed the Oral Torah of Moshe Rabbeinu. Why did Moshe need to spend forty days each time? Just to take the tablets in his hands? He was being taught all the details for keeping the Torah by God. And this happened twice, so that is eighty days of learning Oral Torah. You apparently reject Torah.
As for attitudes of condescension, what do you think about someone who does not read Hebrew or Aramaic, and who has never read the Talmud or the Hebrew Tanakh from cover to cover in Hebrew, of coming in public to make accusations and to bad mouth the Jewish people? Sounds pretty arrogant to me, driven by sectarian doctrine rather than truth or learning.
@72Yonatan "as for attitudes of condescension" like the one you just expressed to me. Here is the deal. If you want to live with the delusion that you can observe man-made religions such as Judaism from the Orthodox Jews/Pharisees and think you are righteous, then you need to read Debarim 4:2 and 12:32. DO NOT ADD TO OR DIMINISH ANY COMMAND IN THE TORAH. The Talmud is one GIANT transgression of the Torah since it adds so many man-made laws and diminishes the commands of YHWH.
Dave: you have accepted a false script hook, line, and sinker. You only know about Judaism from its rival and adversary, and yet you expect to be taken as a person of knowledge here. First, do some elementary research. Your Jeezus was a Pharisee himself, and your misconceptions about Torah are not worthy of discussion. You are not qualified to say anything about scripture that you cannot read one sentence of, or you would know that there is no man-god in our Hebrew bible.
@72Yonatan Another thing, even Yahushua (or Yahoshua if you prefer) called the traditions of the Pharisees transgression of the Torah. Are you a believer of the Scriptures or your religion? If you are a believer of the Scriptures, they point to the Messiah that Moshe spoke about.
It is an illogical statement to say that Torah contradicts Torah. You are in a glass bubble here, of your own construction, and all idolatries, fragile or not, will be rent asunder soon.
@72Yonatan This is where you are illogical. Talmud is not Torah, but man-made traditions of people posing as the chosen people. Orthodox Jews by and large transgress the Torah with their Talmud and other traditions. The Torah given by יהוה is the first five books found in the Tanakh. The Talmud transgresses the Torah of יהוה according to Debarim 4:2 and 12:32. Now go repent for your ignorance.
Jews know who the "posers" and imposters are, and which faith rejects the bible. It is christianity. You have no argument, but merely wish to destroy Jews and Judaism. Torah and the Jewish people are eternal, with God. Foolish missionaries cannot succeed to destroy Israel, the Jewish people, or the Torah of the Creator. Give up and repent of your hate.
@72Yonatan you are partially correct. The Torah is eternal. The Talmud is man-made traditions of men who abandoned Torah by transgressing it according to Debarim 4:2 & 12:32, "You shall not add to or diminish ANY command in the Torah". Yisrael is declared as יהוה's firstborn. The Pharisees were called children of haSatan for a reason, because they transgressed the Torah through their traditions and slaughtered the true Prophets sent by יהוה. You should follow your own last sentence.
It is a biblical command to love God and to distance oneself from a false word. You have the false word here when you come to lure people into idol worship of a human being. God is not a human being, His word is eternal, and the Mishnayot also reflect His teachings to Moshe Rabbeinu on Sinai. The Christians are dualists who cannot understand the concept of One God. Read what you wrote. And no, the rabbis of the Talmud did not murder any of the prophets, and J was not a prophet.
@72Yonatan then you have a serious problem, because the Prophet of whom Moshe spoke of is in fact Yahoshua. Matthew 5:17-20 illustrates how he did not come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets, but to perform them. If he said otherwise, he would have transgressed the Torah like the Pharisees/Orthodox Jews/you have been doing for centuries. By your adherence to Talmud, you are a transgressor of Torah. Deal with it.
@72Yonatan furthermore, Talmud is the false word that you adhere to. Traditions of the elders that transgress the Torah of יהוה. Unless you repent, you shall perish in your sins, which is transgression against the commands within the Torah of יהוה.
@sagitarian000028 Does "Christian apologist" defend the Torah of YHWH or the original Hebrew / Jewish context of the Scriptures? Does "Christian apologist" love the Abba-Father by obeying His Torah? Does "Christian apologist" encourage Christians to leave the religious Greco-Roman mixture of Christianity behind and embrace the original biblical Hebrew faith in the God of Israel? Make research about this man by going to his website before making any accusations and claims.
Real Hebrew speakers and real Hebrew teachers never attempt to pronounce the Divine Name. If you respect that, then you can increase your life span. Treating it lightly will decrease your life span.
@SupernaturalGifts777 Sübyanci olmasan Allah`in nebisine o asagilik ibareyi kullanmazdin. Burda bende hebrew dilini ivriti ögreniyorum hayvanlik yapma
Not all jews my friend, all the bible prophecies.., more and more jews are now recognizing Y'shua, 'Jesus' as messiah, so time is really getting short...
He is messianic..., and follows Y'shua 'Jesus' but still uses the word 'christian' in general.., but don't group him with the nonsense of chrstianity, because he's way beyond that lost cause....
@oymy AND I wish he would STOP using "christian". It BAFFLES me how he can. Mention 5 or 10 things that are associated with that word and I promise you, he denies them. I am not even comfortable with the term "Messianic" because many such groups also believe in the Noahide Laws (which I don't) and that is a real core issue. We have to be very careful with labels. We need to know exactly what they mean. I am NOT "Messianic" if Messianics believe the Torah is only for the Jews.
The form "YESHUA" has been cited to be from the acronym "YESHU", a mutilation of Yahushua's Name used by unbelieving Jews during the late 1st and 2nd century CE (search google.com for more on this). The letters in "YESHU" stood for the sentence, "Yemach Shmo u'Zikro" meaning "may his name be blotted out" (from the scroll of life). You can search the internet yourself with these letters, and find this to be true. This "Yeshu" acronym is highly likely the root of the form "JESUS"
Strong's Concordance reference #2424 (Greek) which leads to reference #3091, the original Hebrew name is (Yahushua).
YAHUSHUA (Hebrew letter spelling, yod-hay-waw-shin-ayin) is the Hebrew name for the successor of Mosheh (Moses), and conveys the meaning of "Yah-is our-salvation"
This apparent dislike for anything associated with His Name is what some scholars believe to have spurred the creation of the apparently blasphemous YESHU acronym in place of the "Yahu" prefix,
you know, why do orthodox jews, athesits, and in general, people who despise those who believe in christ, watch these videos. if you don't like it, and don't agree then don't watch it. please don't ruin it for the rest of us.
@ghostdancer1984 Christ is a Greek word...you follow a Greek god....if Jesus did walked this earth he was not Greek. He was a Hebrew! If you claim to be a Christ follower don't take it at a blind faith. Do your researches seek truth; know the foundation of what you profess to follow. Fossilized customs I dare you!
Because this is our heritage, and we like to keep it original and unchanged. Christian doctrine twists and distorts, intentionally, all of the Hebrew bible.
@72Yonatan It is just told in a different way to different people's...Jesus never tried to replace his Father's Word, He came to fulfill it just as predicted. The Jews mistook His Word for earthly things but Jesus taught that it was a spiritual life and not about earthly things as had been misunderstood, aka. being a Saviour of mankind's soul and not simply an end to Roman occupation which was temporal and only for some.
@andrewpaudreyl From the birth of Jesus right up to the present day Jews have always expressed the deepest HATRED for Jesus, therefore Christians who display the Jewish State Flag are traitors who betray Jesus everyday.
@72Yonatan - Who are you to Judge Christianity, If you remember right we are all supposed to be children of GOD. I happen to be included in your statement and do not appreciate it at all, Maybe it is you who is twisting and distorting things LOSER.
It is your belief that I do not heed what the Almighty says, based on your interpretation (and in my view, misunderstanding) of the Torah/Tanakh. Psalm 97 reads: "Humiliated will be all who worship idols, who pride themselves in worthless gods; to Him all the powers will bow." The bottom line is that when that time comes, we shall see whose messiah is saving whom.
The Almighty, not just my Rabbi, has his candidate. The Jewish people have been waiting patiently for him for a long time and will be until his time comes.
You mean like Joshua? Yehoshua means G-d is my savior. If that's being used as a reference to Jesus I can't understand that. Joshua and Isaiah lived centuries before his time.
Are Christians aware that Jews don't refer to G-d as Yesayahu and such? Yehoshua is Joshua and Yeshaya(hu) is Isaiah. Is it supposed to be some reference to Jesus? Wow, after 4:35 I just realized how complex the rationalization for deifying Jesus is. Referencing that verse in Deuteronomy doesn't hold water. If Jesus isn't Messiah, then Christianity has no more right that the Sajucies to add or take away from the Torah. I'll stop now. (I don't mean to be offensive; I just don't believe in Jesus.)
One big conspiracy! Try asking why there are no written texts or carvings in Europe featuring Paleo Hebrew or Aramaic you get abuse. Yet it is clear that History has been deliberately re-written and tampered with. You will get info on Modern Hebrew, Yiddish, sephardi but all of these are of European origin and are not similar in text to the original Semitic languages. Why??? The 10th century will answer that!
Brad Scott is awesome! He's going to be speaking at a conference in Dallas, Texas in January. My friend Jim Staley is going to be speaking as well. If you like Brad, then you might like Jim too! Check out his channel and see what you think! His page is: passionfortruthvideo
He has an awesome teaching on Israel and the chosen people!
When scripture says that we're not under the law anymore, what that means is that we're not under the CURSE of the law anymore because Yahshua (Jesus) died in our place. It's like this: If someone pays for your speeding ticket (pays for the curse you deserve for speeding), does that mean that we no longer have to obey the speed limit?
We're not under (the curse of) the law, but it's still a sin to break the law (1 John 3:4) and the law teaches us how to love God and love people (1 John 5:2-3)
@RuXTaR By "law" you mean the Torah. "Torah" is better translated as "instructions". Wouldn't you WANT to live by the "instructions" given us by our Creator? Your attitude toward the Torah does not come from Scripture. It has been trained into this culture for 1500 years. Amos 3:7 tells us NOTHING happens that is not revealed to the Prophets. Go into the "old testament" (like we see in Acts 17:11) and see if you can find ANYTHING that speaks bad about the Torah or foretells it will end.
In order to understand Hebrew you first must flush your brain out of thinking like a Greek and reading the bible like a Western, Greek thinking Gentile. Until you do that, this series will never make sense.
I wanted to learn something about Classic Hebrew and all I see is a guy ranting about his fundamentalist beliefs and how science is stupid. The only thing I've learned is that learning Hebrew does not protect you from being a nuthead.
hebrew is a beautiful language! the structure of hebrew is amazing: words are based on something called "the root" - the root of a word is 3 or 4 letters that repeats themselves and their order in ALL of the root forms - for example i have the root ס.פ.ר - if we will put that root in a verb building we will get the verb "to tell". if we will put the exact same letters in a noun building we will get hundreds of nouns that have some sort of connection to the verb "to tell".
for example: ill take the the root ס*פ*ר [can be translated as the latin letters s*f / p*r]
[verb] to tell - lesaper
[noun] book - sefer
[noun] library - sifria
[noun] story - sipur
but nouns can also be created in the way of adding a suffix that symbolize something. for example the suffix "on" symbolizes something small so the word "sifron" means small book, or a booklet.
through every word in hebrew is connected to others.
I am only beginning to learn Hebrew. I tell my family this, and my sister asks "Are you becoming a Jew?" But the reality is although I'm not, I feel I need to study the Jewish roots of Christianity.
7:00 - the first four chapters of Genesis also nullify the Christian view that God expelled Satan from Heaven. Adam, Eve, and Satan are punished, but only Adam and Eve are expelled from Heaven, while Satan is not mentioned. This means that Satan remained in Heaven, which is the source of the Jewish view that Satan (an angel) is a functionary of God who does His Will. In Christianity Satan is an enemy of God, a view found nowhere in Genesis, and not a monotheistic view.
Adam and Eve were in heaven? I thought they were in the garden of Eden. HaSatan gets thrown out of heaven later on. Have you read the book of Enoch. it is not in the tanach as we know it but is mentioned. Really cool!
The Book of Enoch is not a canonical Jewish book, so even if I did read it, and found it interesting, I wouldn't accept it to be Divinely revealed. The Garden of Eden was Heaven's crossroads with earth. In fact, one of the words for "Heaven" in Hebrew is "Eden."
Satan obviously was already fallen when he tempted Eve, so we can conclude that he was de-sanctified and expelled before that time. I don't think you can say that the earth in Adam and Eve's time was heaven. It was certainly heaven-like because of God's presence, but after the sin He left them rather than kicking them out of heaven. Satan surely is an enemy of God, as you can see in his attempts to prevent Jesus from being born f.e. But that doesn't mean God doesn't use him for His purposes
Your first statement is not so obvious - it is not accurate to assume things must be true only in order for your view to be correct - that is backwards thinking. It is specifically mentioned in Genesis that God kicked them out of the Garden of Eden, which was Heaven on Earth. If God uses Satan for His purposes, and His goal was to have Jesus born, wouldn't it have been antithetical to God's purpose to allow Satan to try to prevent Jesus' birth?
Okay, I'm sorry if I'm not very accurate, but it is logical. I must assume Satan was already fallen. I mean, he was crawling around like a snake deceiving people. That's not something a holy angel of God would do.
And well, Jesus was born, wasn't He? God just allowed Satan to try. Why? Probably to show us that Satan actually IS God's enemy and that we must beware for him. Also to show the divinity of Jesus, because He was born " through the eye of a needle" if you look at His ancestors
Satan, the snake, was actually created walking upright and when he was punished he was made to crawl.
In Job, Satan is an angel who tells God that Job's faith is not strong, but has to ask God before he is allowed to do anything to him. There is nowhere in the OT (Torah) that suggests Satan can act against God's Will; it is hard to believe that Satan has no will of his own and can be considered an enemy of God, especially since God has all the power and is the source of all that exists.
But literally everything that happens is God's will in the end. That doesn't mean we all walk in God's way or that we love Him or something. It just means that God is all powerful and that He uses all (before Him and against Him) for His divine plan. Enemy is just a term to describe someone who hates God and Satan only does things to try to thwart God. But he's weaker than God and in the end can only do what God allows him to. But he's still evil. God just uses him to do evil, cause God won't
Well, Isaiah and Amos don't agree with you. They said, "I form the light, and create darkness; I make peace, and create evil; I am the LORD, that doeth all these things." (Isaiah 45:7) Amos doesn't either - he said, "Shall the horn be blown in a city, and the people not tremble? Shall evil befall a city, and the LORD hath not done it?" (Amos 3:6)
That Isaiah passage is referring to judgement of sinners, so evil is better understood as "disaster" as apposed to blessing.
I think the Amos passage can be interpreted that way too.
You can't really say evil is something you can create. It's the absence of obedience to God. While God certainly planned it, He couldn't directly create it. If only out of the definition of evil.
Evil is something that primarily came out of man/angel, which God only uses for His plan.
I looked up the Hebrew and it says "ra'," which means "evil." I would consider your point if you showed me another place in the Tanakh where the word "ra'" is translated as "disaster" and not "evil."
The second thing you said certainly seems true on one level, on a deeper level, everything that exists, even things that God hates, exist because He in some way, shape, or form, has created them.
Well, yeah, evil is a translation for ra, but so is calamity. Ra is mostly used for " evil", but in this context calamity makes more sense, because it's used as opposite of "peace", not "good'. Btw, there's enough scholars who back this up, because most translations say "calamity' or something alike
@vincentjdrummer Also, see how the word "ra," "evil," is used in Exodus 32:14. This verse demonstrates that God can make evil and that it's not necessarily just an absence of good.
@vincentjdrummer I agree that "evil" can be rendered "disaster." However, there are sources in Judaism which say that God creates evil, although, as you said, as a means to an end, in which case "evil" would be rendered "disaster." If we were to render evil NOT as disaster but as true evil, we still must say that it is a creation of God, for evil would have no way to exist were God to decide that it shouldn't. God gives the ability for evil although He hates it. Free will.
If Satan was God's enemy, then he is equal to God in power. If Satan is equal to God in power, then he is another god. If Satan is another god, then there are two gods. Any religion which believes that Satan is equal to God in power is therefore not monotheistic, and therefore Christianity would not be considered a monotheistic religion.
your statement is quite strange, since when is an opponent equal to someone?
i could play chess versus a grandmaster chess, i would be his enemy, but he would kick my butt. satan is not equal to God in anyway, and most certainly not in power. satan lost the battle by far... there's only one God, Jesus, the Father, and the Holy Spirit. Those who have ears, hear!. God bless
Well, yes, if you're talking about normal people then an opponent is not necessary equal to someone. But if you are talking about God, to even be able to issue a challenge to Him implies that God struggled, even if just a little bit, against Satan. That can't really be a theological truth implying an imperfection, even a small one, in God. The difference between two chess players is quantitative, between Satan and God the difference is qualitative; God is the Creator and Satan is created.
Anyone can issue any challenge versus anyone, first of all, satan challenged God, satan thought he was the same as God or higher, God wooped him. i dont know why God chose to defeat satan the way He did, but He did. He could have destroyed satan in a second i'm sure. But maybe it has to do with God being righteous and Him having ways to handle things, now the punishment for satan is even bigger, eternal pain in hell. God won the battle by far. (quantitative and qualitative have nothing to do)
The Torah's view on the limits of Satan's power is stated in Genesis 4:6-7:
"And God said to Cain: 'Why are you angry and why has your countenance fallen? If you do well, shall it not be lifted up? And if do not do well well, sin crouches at the door; its desire is toward you yet you can conquer it.'"
Little mistake made at ~5 minutes; he did not show how the verse in Deuteronomy refers to the "additions" and "omissions" that he claims the Pharisees made. That's a fallacy. The Torah NEVER mentions HOW to ritually slaughter an animal, but nevertheless tells us to do it. THAT information, not contained anywhere in the Written Torah, is contained in the Oral Torah, which has been passed down from then to now, from Moses to the Pharisees, of which I am proudly one (i.e., Orthodox Jew).
@sonofblessed I have a question for you as an Orthodox Jew. Is the concept that what happened to Abraham foreshadows what will happen to Israel valid? Is that something that the Orthodox believe and use to uncover more sod level understanding? If so, I would love to hear more examples from you. If so, do you also believe that what happened to Israel foreshadows what will happen to the world, on a world wide scale some day?
@elskid206 Well, there is only so much you can say about future events, but parts of Abraham's life are considered models for his descendants' future. Some of this in OUR past but was in his future. For example, Abraham went to Egypt twice, and our tradition teaches that it signified his descendants being enslaved there. The big picture of Abraham as the world's teacher of monotheism is understood as being our universal role as well. Genesis 12:2-3 explains it.
@elskid206 If you mean Israel as the country, it's not Israel's fate mirrors Abraham's per se but that the Jews' fate mirrors Abraham. Insofar as Israel is Jewish, then there is a relationship. As for your next question, what do you mean by "what happened to Israel?"
@sonofblessed Agreed Jews as a people not Israel as the nation. Happened to Israel = freed from Egypt. Would you say there is some merit in the concept that there will be future regathering of all "Israel" which would be the equivalent of the 12 brothers living in Egypt? Then the rise of a pharaoh "who does not know Joseph" who will oppress the entire world. Again, setting the stage for a larger degree of the 10 plagues, one involving the whole world - leading to the "second Exodus" of Jer.
@elskid206 Nearly impossible to say. It would require us to know what parts of the Exodus serve as the model for end times. I think the second exodus you're talking about refers to events that have already occurred, because the Jews already came back to Israel from Babylon and Assyria. However, there is no doubt that many of Isaiah's prophecies have not yet occurred and speak about end times. The Exodus as a model doesn't mean that they need to mirror the first Exodus in a specific manner.
Behold, I will send for many fishers, saith HaShem, and they shall fish them; and afterward I will send for many hunters, and they shall hunt them from every mountain, and from every hill, and out of the clefts of the rocks.”
Certainly the return from Babylon is NOT what HaShem is NOW remembered for and Babylon cannot be called “all the countries” and there were no “fishers” and “hunters” involved.
@elskid206 It's a prophecy, that's true. It seems to me that Jeremiah 16:1-10 is talking about the sins that caused the Jews to get expelled from Israel, 10-14 to be speaking about their return, and 14-21 to jumping back to talking about the expulsion that is about to happen. Do we know that fishermen and hunters were not the people sent to capture the Jews? Further, it could be that those 2 terms are used to disgrace the Jews by likening them to hunted fish and animals. Now is not NOW.
@sonofblessed I would have to disagree that the 2 Exodus has occurred. Jeremiah says, “Therefore, behold, the days come, saith HaShem, that it shall no more be said: 'As HaShem liveth, that brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,but: 'As HaShem liveth, that brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the countries whither He had driven them'; and I will bring them back into their land that I gave unto their fathers.
@elskid206 It is interesting that the verse says "all the countries." It's tempting to say that God means "all the countries" in which the Jews live now. I don't know enough about this at this time so I can't comment. Hopefully I'll be able to soon.
@sonofblessed YES!! I think that is EXACTLY what it means. I think in the future (maybe next TUESDAY the way things are going!! LOL) I believe HaShem will awaken all the descendants of Abraham who were dispersed into the world and LOST THEIR IDENTITY. HE will GATHER them. "GATHER" is a HUGE theme in the Tanakh. I believe HaShem will again allow a pharaoh to oppress the world at which point He will supernaturally protest HIS and pour plagues on the rest so that they know HE IS the great I AM.
@elskid206 I expect that God will gather the Jews, but I don't totally agree with the Exodus from Egypt being used as the model for the ingathering of the exiles in all its specifities. This is not supported in the text or in Jewish sources.
@elskid206 I assume you are Jewish with the use of HaShem, but why call the eternal Creator as what would be translated as "the Name", or even Adonai, which is a title that means Sovereign? The Tetragrammaton of yud-heh-vav-heh was never intended to be ineffable as the Orthodox Jews claim. While there is dispute as to its proper pronunciation, with Yahweh as considered the most accurate, I know that a name represents the character and reputation of the one being called by that name.
@davegooley I am not "Jewish"; but there is an extraordinary pull on me toward the Jewish people and Israel. I am not sure of your source for the comment that YHVH was never intended to be ineffable. Can you site some references for that? There are several versions of YHVH that I think have merit. I simply stopped using g.o.d. as the Father's name (most often I say "Father") and for the Son I mostly use Yashua. Since j.e.s.u.s is a greek word, and the was no "j", I refuse to use it.
@elskid206 in the law of blasphemy, pronounced Hallakah, according to the Orthodox Jews, they deemed that pronouncing the Tetragrammaton was a crime. It was claimed that pagans were blaspheming the eternal Creator's name, so as part of their takanot (tah-kah-note), they made the law that no person was permitted to pronounce His name. One way they reference Him is with haShem. Another way is with Adonai, but usually only through prayers.
@davegooley oh yeah you are right. The Father never intended that His Name be forbidden to be spoken. And yes I agree Yahweh is probably most accurate. I am sorry I misread your post.
@elskid206 no problem. Yahweh is calling all to return to Him. Regardless of when Yahushua haMashiach returns, we need to be ready always. I learned through Hebrew Roots that Yom Taruah is the most likely appointed day of His return because of the reference "no man knows the day or the hour" since all have to watch for the sliver of the new moon for the appointed day to begin. In addition, the blowing of the shofar is also a clue that leans towards this day as well. His return can be any year.
how can you say he loved the whole world and preach noahs ark?there are many stories of god ordering the killing of man woman child and livestock sodom and gmorrah he loves the whole world?quite the opposite.
Do you love murderers? Do you love oppressors? He gave them all warnings and told them to repent. He hates evil. Sodom and Gomorrah were evil murderers,prideful,rapers of people. So why would he love such actions.
SHA'LAM @72Yonatan: WHAT IS THE IGNORANCY, ABOUT MY QUESTION AND WHAT MALICE IN IT. OR YOU WANT ME TO MAKE MYSELF, A BED FOR FOOL.
prophetkey 3 weeks ago
semitic languages :
ASSIRYAN + BABYLONIAN + ARABIC + HEBREW
SHAHARMOS79 1 month ago
currently, I am trying to translate Romans. from the Hebrew to the Latin through the Greek into English. it is amazing how many Hebrew idioms are so grotesquely translated into English from the Greek.
point: I have found that from Hebrew to English in the OT, that much of Hebrew seems/IS in double entendre, & marvelously the double entendre extends INTACT for the "paragraph", for the "chapter", even unto the whole book! Especially with the "minor prophets"
CHERISH is the new love
FlyingAxblade 1 month ago in playlist More videos from mytreasure777
Could you please do Brad Scott's Biblical Hebrew series in their own playlist, just of this series? It's very hard to watch them in order this way! Thanks for sharing.
Revelation21NINE 1 month ago
BIBLICAL HEBREW LANGUAGE - PART 1, ten and a half mins, of waffle and no Hebrew language! I'm not going to bother with the rest of these LOL
MexSanukk 1 month ago
HEBREW + ARAMIC + ASYRIAN
very close to each other
shaharmos 4 months ago
Amharic is the real Biblical language, NOT Hebrew, Hebrew is a rip off of Aramaic, Arabic, & Amharic.
dwalkerdon 6 months ago
@dwalkerdon Old Hebrew is older than Aramaic I think, not sure, but Aramaic was used in New Testament times as well as Assyrian which is similar and Greek was the "educated" language, though Hebrew was still being used by the Jews I believe. I would think Latin was used by the Romans or one of the other languages of ancient Rome which I think died out even before Latin(possibly). Arabic came later and it is a Semitic language but a bit more indirectly...like east/west/southern Slavik languages
andrewpaudreyl 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm bored. Send me mail.
imboredsendmemail@gmail.com
imboredsendmemail 8 months ago
STRANGE BIBLICAL HEBREW LANGUAGE!!!
not a hebrew letter was shown
yt809 8 months ago 3
This bozo didn't teach any Hebrew!
einsatzdeath 9 months ago
@einsatzdeath I think this video is a primer to establish the foundation for the course.
davegooley 8 months ago
Interesting and Brilliant!!! Thank you. I am going to study this. You are delivering a great service to us all. Bless You, Brother Scott.
scottybroker 10 months ago
Just want to say I am an atheist and don't hate Christians or other religious people. The religious people I dislike, I would dislike even if they were also atheist. I have many atheist friends who are also like this. Please don't think that all atheists are haters and/or rude. :)
Squad11Captain 10 months ago
I didn't realize Mr. Scott was filming in Israel; I surmise that is the reason the Israeli flag is in the background.
But I appreciate his efforts to teach the Hebrew language.
RPenta 10 months ago
Thank you Brad andmytreasure !! for blessing my journey
SabreH1 11 months ago
According to a source, Hebrew is actually a form of Greek.
EsheAhkura 11 months ago
@EsheAhkura You can find "a source" to confirm ANY position. I left christianity because they had strong beliefs but no legitimate support for them. Some of their most important doctrines are based on less than clear verses which contradict very clear verses. You can BELIEVE the world is flat, but you cannot convincingly SUPPORT that belief. You can BELIEVE that you can change the Sabbath, but you cannot SUPPORT that. We would need that foretold by prophets and confirmation in the Tanakh.
elskid206 11 months ago 2
@elskid206 Y'know all I really have to say is: Don't get it twisted... reality is not what it appears to be.
And the source is Jordan Maxwell. I don't think anyone can honestly debate his 50 years of research, unless of course they're a paid goverment individual or group... or maybe just an idiot. "Lord" (Lard) knows.
EsheAhkura 11 months ago
@elskid206
Amein
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
@EsheAhkura actually, Hebrew is the original language whereas all other languages, including Greek, are the result of Yahweh confounding the language so the people couldn't communicate with each other due to Nimrod's plan to build a tower to reach heaven.
davegooley 8 months ago 3
@davegooley Jordan Maxwell, et cetera... Now: Fuck off.
And don't waste my time, like the rest of these little fags on dick.
EsheAhkura 8 months ago
@EsheAhkura let me say this last thing and I won't respond to any more of your comments. Nobody can ever accuse you of being a believer in Yahweh or Yahushua since the fruit you just displayed is reflective of the rebellious nature of Satan.
davegooley 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@davegooley Man... just shut the fuck up, about an Nibiruan extraterrestrial "god" (Yahweh), or a composite character (Jesus) and symbol for the Sun.
I got research and information from an E.T. contactee, that contradicts, the "official sanctioned version," of Rome... The Pope: The New Caesar of Saturnia (Rome).
"After the fall of Rome, the pope served as a source of authority and continuity." - Wikipedia, on the Pope.
EsheAhkura 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@davegooley And "Satan" is actually Saturn. It amazes me how much people think they know, when in fact, they don't know. Go do your research. Find out where these words, terms and symbols actually come from. You'll be surprised.
Jordan Maxwell and Alex Collier's information is excellent! Most people just can't handle it, that's all....
EsheAhkura 8 months ago
Comment removed
planetery 4 months ago
Does he hve Tzitzits on his belt? I thought he was a Christian an most Christians I know don't feel the need to wear them.
ChristianPainter 1 year ago
@ChristianPainter I wear tzitzits for several reasons a) because Scripture tells us to b) our Messiah did (tzitzits are what the women with the "issue of blood" touched) c) they show that I believe in both the Father and the Son and observe the Torah. The Torah is "THE WORD" which was "made flesh. Our Messiah IS the Torah made flesh. The Tanakh (first five books of Scripture, Prophets, Psalms) is the authority which must confirm concepts from the apostolic writings (new testament).
elskid206 11 months ago
@ChristianPainter The strongest piece of evidence that the Tanakh is the authority is Acts 17:11. Paul told the people of Berea "the gospel". In order to CONFIRM what he said, they checked the Tanakh. That means that the TANAKH is the superior authority, NOT anything Paul said. For example if Paul taught that the Sabbath could be changed, where in the Scriptures is that found? How could the Bereans CONFIRM what Paul said unless EVERYTHING he said was already in print in the Tanakh?
elskid206 11 months ago
@ChristianPainter Brad considers himself a Messianic follower of Y'shua. Christianity has abandoned much of the Torah of Yahweh because of Roman Catholicism being the foundation thereof. It was at the reformation that much of Roman Catholicism was rejected while the annual traditions, based off of heathen practices, were retained.
davegooley 8 months ago
I love this man, Jesus loved us he was an orthodox jew of 2012 over 2000 years ago. Listen to your hearts, I pray to you, i cheer to you, i cry for you, i laugh for you, i smile for you, i feel ashamed for you, my christ, my saviour, our love of god for he is our almighty raa of existence. Please listen to me people, 2012 is coming, David Wilcock from project camelot is coming. Rael, you are ours, kiss us and please lick my soul serpert of adam and eve.
adellemusic 1 year ago
Every one wanting to learn about Judaism DO NOT LEARN FROM THIS CHRISTIAN APPOLOGIST learn from actual jews
sagitarian000028 1 year ago 3
@sagitarian000028 Shalom! Brad Scott is definitely not a "Christian apogologist" but Torah-obedient messianic believer in Yeshua HaMashiach. Christianity and judaism is not the answer because both of them has their roots in ancient Babel (confusion). The Living Torah is the answer. Both Judaism and Christianity have profaned the Torah of YHWH by their religious man-made rules and regulations. So who you are to comdemn this man? We should keep Yah's Word in our Focus, not men's religions.
peteliuz79 1 year ago
@sagitarian000028 I have a question for you as an Jew (assuming you are). Is the concept that what happened to Abraham foreshadows what will happen to Israel valid? Is that something that the Orthodox believe and use to uncover more sod level understanding? If so, I would love to hear more examples from you. If so, do you also believe that what happened to Israel foreshadows what will happen to the world, on a world wide scale some day?
elskid206 11 months ago
@elskid206
The nations who cling to Hashem and His Torah will be saved, about one third of this world population. The other two thirds will be killed in the final world war of Gog and Magog. We should all use our time wisely. See Ezekiel starting at 37, 38, 39 for more details. Read Zechariah 14: 12 - 14: 19 for further description of the plague and what the survivors will do.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
@sagitarian000028 considering that "actual Jews" as in Orthodox Jews, have transgressed Deuteronomy 4:2 with their oral tradition, they are certainly not a source I would consider. Karaite Jews such as Nehemia Gordon would be someone I would ask about the ancient Hebrew Scriptures.
davegooley 8 months ago
@davegooley
Your understanding level is lower than kindergarten, and you have tried to succeed at calculus, but failed. Without the "masorah" (oral Torah) one would not even be able to read the Hebrew bible or pronounce a single letter. Without the masorah, one would not know how to construct Tefilin or know what contents have to be placed inside. Without Masorah, one would not know how to slaughter an animal properly. And the references to the fact of oral teachings is contained in the text.
72Yonatan 5 months ago
@72Yonatan nice condescending attitude you have there. I do agree that my level of understanding is less than basic as I am just learning. However, the "oral Torah", which includes the Talmud and other collections of understanding, have added to the commands of the Torah given by יהוה regarding what and how to observe. For example, the Torah of the Pharisees added more steps to the observance of the Sabbath that were never intended. This is what I was referring to.
davegooley 5 months ago
@davegooley
Example of adding a command: "to make five tsitsiot instead of four." The Torah commands "corners" which are four corners for a standard garment. Perushim have not added and they have followed the Oral Torah of Moshe Rabbeinu. Why did Moshe need to spend forty days each time? Just to take the tablets in his hands? He was being taught all the details for keeping the Torah by God. And this happened twice, so that is eighty days of learning Oral Torah. You apparently reject Torah.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
@davegooley
As for attitudes of condescension, what do you think about someone who does not read Hebrew or Aramaic, and who has never read the Talmud or the Hebrew Tanakh from cover to cover in Hebrew, of coming in public to make accusations and to bad mouth the Jewish people? Sounds pretty arrogant to me, driven by sectarian doctrine rather than truth or learning.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
@72Yonatan "as for attitudes of condescension" like the one you just expressed to me. Here is the deal. If you want to live with the delusion that you can observe man-made religions such as Judaism from the Orthodox Jews/Pharisees and think you are righteous, then you need to read Debarim 4:2 and 12:32. DO NOT ADD TO OR DIMINISH ANY COMMAND IN THE TORAH. The Talmud is one GIANT transgression of the Torah since it adds so many man-made laws and diminishes the commands of YHWH.
davegooley 3 weeks ago
@davegooley
Dave: you have accepted a false script hook, line, and sinker. You only know about Judaism from its rival and adversary, and yet you expect to be taken as a person of knowledge here. First, do some elementary research. Your Jeezus was a Pharisee himself, and your misconceptions about Torah are not worthy of discussion. You are not qualified to say anything about scripture that you cannot read one sentence of, or you would know that there is no man-god in our Hebrew bible.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
@72Yonatan Another thing, even Yahushua (or Yahoshua if you prefer) called the traditions of the Pharisees transgression of the Torah. Are you a believer of the Scriptures or your religion? If you are a believer of the Scriptures, they point to the Messiah that Moshe spoke about.
davegooley 3 weeks ago
@davegooley
It is an illogical statement to say that Torah contradicts Torah. You are in a glass bubble here, of your own construction, and all idolatries, fragile or not, will be rent asunder soon.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
@72Yonatan This is where you are illogical. Talmud is not Torah, but man-made traditions of people posing as the chosen people. Orthodox Jews by and large transgress the Torah with their Talmud and other traditions. The Torah given by יהוה is the first five books found in the Tanakh. The Talmud transgresses the Torah of יהוה according to Debarim 4:2 and 12:32. Now go repent for your ignorance.
davegooley 3 weeks ago
@davegooley
Jews know who the "posers" and imposters are, and which faith rejects the bible. It is christianity. You have no argument, but merely wish to destroy Jews and Judaism. Torah and the Jewish people are eternal, with God. Foolish missionaries cannot succeed to destroy Israel, the Jewish people, or the Torah of the Creator. Give up and repent of your hate.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
@72Yonatan you are partially correct. The Torah is eternal. The Talmud is man-made traditions of men who abandoned Torah by transgressing it according to Debarim 4:2 & 12:32, "You shall not add to or diminish ANY command in the Torah". Yisrael is declared as יהוה's firstborn. The Pharisees were called children of haSatan for a reason, because they transgressed the Torah through their traditions and slaughtered the true Prophets sent by יהוה. You should follow your own last sentence.
davegooley 3 weeks ago
@davegooley
It is a biblical command to love God and to distance oneself from a false word. You have the false word here when you come to lure people into idol worship of a human being. God is not a human being, His word is eternal, and the Mishnayot also reflect His teachings to Moshe Rabbeinu on Sinai. The Christians are dualists who cannot understand the concept of One God. Read what you wrote. And no, the rabbis of the Talmud did not murder any of the prophets, and J was not a prophet.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
@72Yonatan then you have a serious problem, because the Prophet of whom Moshe spoke of is in fact Yahoshua. Matthew 5:17-20 illustrates how he did not come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets, but to perform them. If he said otherwise, he would have transgressed the Torah like the Pharisees/Orthodox Jews/you have been doing for centuries. By your adherence to Talmud, you are a transgressor of Torah. Deal with it.
davegooley 3 weeks ago
@72Yonatan furthermore, Talmud is the false word that you adhere to. Traditions of the elders that transgress the Torah of יהוה. Unless you repent, you shall perish in your sins, which is transgression against the commands within the Torah of יהוה.
davegooley 3 weeks ago
@davegooley
Karaites have developed their own Oral traditions, and they are the ones who have added.
72Yonatan 5 months ago
this guy is a christian apologist
sagitarian000028 1 year ago 2
@sagitarian000028 Does "Christian apologist" defend the Torah of YHWH or the original Hebrew / Jewish context of the Scriptures? Does "Christian apologist" love the Abba-Father by obeying His Torah? Does "Christian apologist" encourage Christians to leave the religious Greco-Roman mixture of Christianity behind and embrace the original biblical Hebrew faith in the God of Israel? Make research about this man by going to his website before making any accusations and claims.
peteliuz79 1 year ago
SHA'LAM : IS THE BIBLICA HEBREW, AN ORIGINAL HEBRAIC DIALECT OR A TIBERIAN INVENTION ?
prophetkey 1 year ago
@prophetkey
The fact that you ask such a question shows that you speak in ignorance and act in malice.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
This is how you say the name of our Creator... If you really want to know.
You say it like this... Yah Who Shoe Wa
MyThoughtsIhave 1 year ago
@MyThoughtsIhave there is no shin in the name YHWH.
yomamasofat87 1 year ago
browsed through it, not a language course. luckily, cuz this guys hebrew is bad.
Ramsez 1 year ago
Real Hebrew speakers and real Hebrew teachers never attempt to pronounce the Divine Name. If you respect that, then you can increase your life span. Treating it lightly will decrease your life span.
72Yonatan 1 year ago
@FreedomFighterReturn
Muhammad was not a Prophet a Pedophile yes But not a Prophet
SupernaturalGifts777 1 year ago
@SupernaturalGifts777 Sübyanci olmasan Allah`in nebisine o asagilik ibareyi kullanmazdin. Burda bende hebrew dilini ivriti ögreniyorum hayvanlik yapma
2007hannover 1 year ago
FREEDOM FIGHTER RETURN SANA SÖZÜMDÜ LAGAM SICANI
2007hannover 1 year ago
@FreedomFighterReturn freedom from what? Are you sure you know?
focantino1 1 year ago
Is there a way to purchase the videos on these teachings? This is GREAT! and should be added to everyone's collection of resoures for study.
cbpink59 1 year ago
Not all jews my friend, all the bible prophecies.., more and more jews are now recognizing Y'shua, 'Jesus' as messiah, so time is really getting short...
oymy 1 year ago
@oymy
More and more folks like yourself are in a frenzy, perhaps. But actually many christians are moving to become Jews.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
Glorious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hayajedid28 1 year ago
is this guy a christian?
ouluvme2 1 year ago
He is messianic..., and follows Y'shua 'Jesus' but still uses the word 'christian' in general.., but don't group him with the nonsense of chrstianity, because he's way beyond that lost cause....
oymy 1 year ago
@oymy AND I wish he would STOP using "christian". It BAFFLES me how he can. Mention 5 or 10 things that are associated with that word and I promise you, he denies them. I am not even comfortable with the term "Messianic" because many such groups also believe in the Noahide Laws (which I don't) and that is a real core issue. We have to be very careful with labels. We need to know exactly what they mean. I am NOT "Messianic" if Messianics believe the Torah is only for the Jews.
elskid206 11 months ago
Yahweh is not a God (EL) or Lord (adonai or Baal), He is our Creator and Heavenly Father! Isayah 43:10 ...Before Me there was NO GOD (EL)
formed, NOR WILL THERE BE AFTER ME." but Brad got some truth, I'm not going to take that from him... more truth than the Christians! wwwYAHWEHcom
alyahenai 1 year ago
We're brothers! God is smarter than us. Woo Hoo!
solteria14 1 year ago
Can anyone please tell me how would you pronounce this in original Hebrew written in the old times:
םידמחמ
It goes from left to right, although I suppose Hebrew is written from the right to left, like Arabic.
And, please, also tell me the meaning of this word and how do you join the sound together with the vowels when you say this word.
Thanks.
adeelboy2010 1 year ago
@adeelboy2010
See Strongs H4261/H4262
You wrote it from left to right instead of right to left.
The yod-mem ending indicates a plural masculine ending "-eem".
Turtledoves50 1 year ago
@adeelboy2010
Mehamdim. There is not any "chet" in Latin letters, so I substituted an "H" in its place, but that is not the true letter.
72Yonatan 3 weeks ago
The form "YESHUA" has been cited to be from the acronym "YESHU", a mutilation of Yahushua's Name used by unbelieving Jews during the late 1st and 2nd century CE (search google.com for more on this). The letters in "YESHU" stood for the sentence, "Yemach Shmo u'Zikro" meaning "may his name be blotted out" (from the scroll of life). You can search the internet yourself with these letters, and find this to be true. This "Yeshu" acronym is highly likely the root of the form "JESUS"
derekdb2 1 year ago
Strong's Concordance reference #2424 (Greek) which leads to reference #3091, the original Hebrew name is (Yahushua).
YAHUSHUA (Hebrew letter spelling, yod-hay-waw-shin-ayin) is the Hebrew name for the successor of Mosheh (Moses), and conveys the meaning of "Yah-is our-salvation"
This apparent dislike for anything associated with His Name is what some scholars believe to have spurred the creation of the apparently blasphemous YESHU acronym in place of the "Yahu" prefix,
derekdb2 1 year ago
The Biblical Creator is named, YHWH .
YHWH is never referred to by a word that is pronounced "God" (Gawd) in the Hebrew text.
derekdb2 1 year ago 2
I´m very interested in hebrew. I love it!
jlgpalacin 1 year ago
gypsy world capital, always on road...
eshii777 1 year ago
5:06 into the video and i just gave up, I came here for the language, not preaching.
learnalanguage 1 year ago
when he comes all nations on earth will be against him correct! peace shalom
Winter412 1 year ago
GodGRACE
Mike7772009 1 year ago
you know, why do orthodox jews, athesits, and in general, people who despise those who believe in christ, watch these videos. if you don't like it, and don't agree then don't watch it. please don't ruin it for the rest of us.
thank you.
ghostdancer1984 2 years ago 29
@ghostdancer1984 Christ is a Greek word...you follow a Greek god....if Jesus did walked this earth he was not Greek. He was a Hebrew! If you claim to be a Christ follower don't take it at a blind faith. Do your researches seek truth; know the foundation of what you profess to follow. Fossilized customs I dare you!
focantino1 1 year ago
@focantino1 omg....you must be joking. ::rolls his eyes:: i'm not in the mood for this arguement today. maybe later.
ghostdancer1984 1 year ago
@ghostdancer1984
Because this is our heritage, and we like to keep it original and unchanged. Christian doctrine twists and distorts, intentionally, all of the Hebrew bible.
72Yonatan 1 year ago 8
@72Yonatan It is just told in a different way to different people's...Jesus never tried to replace his Father's Word, He came to fulfill it just as predicted. The Jews mistook His Word for earthly things but Jesus taught that it was a spiritual life and not about earthly things as had been misunderstood, aka. being a Saviour of mankind's soul and not simply an end to Roman occupation which was temporal and only for some.
andrewpaudreyl 5 months ago
@andrewpaudreyl From the birth of Jesus right up to the present day Jews have always expressed the deepest HATRED for Jesus, therefore Christians who display the Jewish State Flag are traitors who betray Jesus everyday.
dreamdiction 1 month ago
@72Yonatan - Who are you to Judge Christianity, If you remember right we are all supposed to be children of GOD. I happen to be included in your statement and do not appreciate it at all, Maybe it is you who is twisting and distorting things LOSER.
bigtowman72 3 weeks ago
@ghostdancer1984 Perhaps God is tugging at their hearts but they're to stubborn to listen?
ImMrEaston 1 year ago
@ghostdancer1984 ...c'mom don't be a crying baby, Y'shua endured the cross with out crying, grow up !!!
LIQUIDFLUIDR12X 1 year ago
@LIQUIDFLUIDR12X lol
yomamasofat87 1 year ago
@LIQUIDFLUIDR12X
i thought this video was about learning hebrew, not a damn lecture on the bible oy vey :(
yomamasofat87 1 year ago
It is your belief that I do not heed what the Almighty says, based on your interpretation (and in my view, misunderstanding) of the Torah/Tanakh. Psalm 97 reads: "Humiliated will be all who worship idols, who pride themselves in worthless gods; to Him all the powers will bow." The bottom line is that when that time comes, we shall see whose messiah is saving whom.
EliYBY 2 years ago
The Almighty, not just my Rabbi, has his candidate. The Jewish people have been waiting patiently for him for a long time and will be until his time comes.
EliYBY 2 years ago
You mean like Joshua? Yehoshua means G-d is my savior. If that's being used as a reference to Jesus I can't understand that. Joshua and Isaiah lived centuries before his time.
EliYBY 2 years ago
Are Christians aware that Jews don't refer to G-d as Yesayahu and such? Yehoshua is Joshua and Yeshaya(hu) is Isaiah. Is it supposed to be some reference to Jesus? Wow, after 4:35 I just realized how complex the rationalization for deifying Jesus is. Referencing that verse in Deuteronomy doesn't hold water. If Jesus isn't Messiah, then Christianity has no more right that the Sajucies to add or take away from the Torah. I'll stop now. (I don't mean to be offensive; I just don't believe in Jesus.)
EliYBY 2 years ago
whats this kind stuff!? Go and buy a Israel UZI something...
SMGJohn 2 years ago
One big conspiracy! Try asking why there are no written texts or carvings in Europe featuring Paleo Hebrew or Aramaic you get abuse. Yet it is clear that History has been deliberately re-written and tampered with. You will get info on Modern Hebrew, Yiddish, sephardi but all of these are of European origin and are not similar in text to the original Semitic languages. Why??? The 10th century will answer that!
FugginBarstod 2 years ago
Brad Scott is awesome! He's going to be speaking at a conference in Dallas, Texas in January. My friend Jim Staley is going to be speaking as well. If you like Brad, then you might like Jim too! Check out his channel and see what you think! His page is: passionfortruthvideo
He has an awesome teaching on Israel and the chosen people!
davewilber 2 years ago
are we supposed to still live under the law and obey it?
RuXTaR 2 years ago
ysiti applicable snce Yeshua fulfill it not abolish it
raymayorga 2 years ago
When scripture says that we're not under the law anymore, what that means is that we're not under the CURSE of the law anymore because Yahshua (Jesus) died in our place. It's like this: If someone pays for your speeding ticket (pays for the curse you deserve for speeding), does that mean that we no longer have to obey the speed limit?
We're not under (the curse of) the law, but it's still a sin to break the law (1 John 3:4) and the law teaches us how to love God and love people (1 John 5:2-3)
davewilber 2 years ago
Yes.
mfirebrand1 2 years ago
@RuXTaR By "law" you mean the Torah. "Torah" is better translated as "instructions". Wouldn't you WANT to live by the "instructions" given us by our Creator? Your attitude toward the Torah does not come from Scripture. It has been trained into this culture for 1500 years. Amos 3:7 tells us NOTHING happens that is not revealed to the Prophets. Go into the "old testament" (like we see in Acts 17:11) and see if you can find ANYTHING that speaks bad about the Torah or foretells it will end.
elskid206 11 months ago
makingthematrix...
In order to understand Hebrew you first must flush your brain out of thinking like a Greek and reading the bible like a Western, Greek thinking Gentile. Until you do that, this series will never make sense.
kevinseanob 2 years ago 10
What is this stuff?
I wanted to learn something about Classic Hebrew and all I see is a guy ranting about his fundamentalist beliefs and how science is stupid. The only thing I've learned is that learning Hebrew does not protect you from being a nuthead.
makingthematrix 2 years ago
hebrew is a beautiful language! the structure of hebrew is amazing: words are based on something called "the root" - the root of a word is 3 or 4 letters that repeats themselves and their order in ALL of the root forms - for example i have the root ס.פ.ר - if we will put that root in a verb building we will get the verb "to tell". if we will put the exact same letters in a noun building we will get hundreds of nouns that have some sort of connection to the verb "to tell".
kidi1232 2 years ago
for example: ill take the the root ס*פ*ר [can be translated as the latin letters s*f / p*r]
[verb] to tell - lesaper
[noun] book - sefer
[noun] library - sifria
[noun] story - sipur
but nouns can also be created in the way of adding a suffix that symbolize something. for example the suffix "on" symbolizes something small so the word "sifron" means small book, or a booklet.
through every word in hebrew is connected to others.
kidi1232 2 years ago 2
I am only beginning to learn Hebrew. I tell my family this, and my sister asks "Are you becoming a Jew?" But the reality is although I'm not, I feel I need to study the Jewish roots of Christianity.
Jimmyhendrick2 2 years ago
Don't go too far; if you understand enough Hebrew you might become interested in converting.
sonofblessed 2 years ago
Oh I'm sure studying the Old Testament, Jewish Bible in its original language will be fascinating.
If you're a man of Faith it will probably give you lots of insight.
I'm totally new to hebrew, but I can already see it's a real treasure
vincentjdrummer 2 years ago
man i came here to lean something about Hebrew. not to learn about religion.
IMakeOrWatchVideos 2 years ago
Hehe ----- Hebrew is a religious language.
sonofblessed 2 years ago
All right. thats true.
IMakeOrWatchVideos 2 years ago
7:00 - the first four chapters of Genesis also nullify the Christian view that God expelled Satan from Heaven. Adam, Eve, and Satan are punished, but only Adam and Eve are expelled from Heaven, while Satan is not mentioned. This means that Satan remained in Heaven, which is the source of the Jewish view that Satan (an angel) is a functionary of God who does His Will. In Christianity Satan is an enemy of God, a view found nowhere in Genesis, and not a monotheistic view.
sonofblessed 2 years ago
Adam and Eve were in heaven? I thought they were in the garden of Eden. HaSatan gets thrown out of heaven later on. Have you read the book of Enoch. it is not in the tanach as we know it but is mentioned. Really cool!
christinepro 2 years ago
The Book of Enoch is not a canonical Jewish book, so even if I did read it, and found it interesting, I wouldn't accept it to be Divinely revealed. The Garden of Eden was Heaven's crossroads with earth. In fact, one of the words for "Heaven" in Hebrew is "Eden."
sonofblessed 2 years ago
Satan obviously was already fallen when he tempted Eve, so we can conclude that he was de-sanctified and expelled before that time. I don't think you can say that the earth in Adam and Eve's time was heaven. It was certainly heaven-like because of God's presence, but after the sin He left them rather than kicking them out of heaven. Satan surely is an enemy of God, as you can see in his attempts to prevent Jesus from being born f.e. But that doesn't mean God doesn't use him for His purposes
vincentjdrummer 2 years ago
Your first statement is not so obvious - it is not accurate to assume things must be true only in order for your view to be correct - that is backwards thinking. It is specifically mentioned in Genesis that God kicked them out of the Garden of Eden, which was Heaven on Earth. If God uses Satan for His purposes, and His goal was to have Jesus born, wouldn't it have been antithetical to God's purpose to allow Satan to try to prevent Jesus' birth?
sonofblessed 2 years ago
Okay, I'm sorry if I'm not very accurate, but it is logical. I must assume Satan was already fallen. I mean, he was crawling around like a snake deceiving people. That's not something a holy angel of God would do.
And well, Jesus was born, wasn't He? God just allowed Satan to try. Why? Probably to show us that Satan actually IS God's enemy and that we must beware for him. Also to show the divinity of Jesus, because He was born " through the eye of a needle" if you look at His ancestors
vincentjdrummer 2 years ago
Satan, the snake, was actually created walking upright and when he was punished he was made to crawl.
In Job, Satan is an angel who tells God that Job's faith is not strong, but has to ask God before he is allowed to do anything to him. There is nowhere in the OT (Torah) that suggests Satan can act against God's Will; it is hard to believe that Satan has no will of his own and can be considered an enemy of God, especially since God has all the power and is the source of all that exists.
sonofblessed 2 years ago
But literally everything that happens is God's will in the end. That doesn't mean we all walk in God's way or that we love Him or something. It just means that God is all powerful and that He uses all (before Him and against Him) for His divine plan. Enemy is just a term to describe someone who hates God and Satan only does things to try to thwart God. But he's weaker than God and in the end can only do what God allows him to. But he's still evil. God just uses him to do evil, cause God won't
vincentjdrummer 2 years ago
Well, Isaiah and Amos don't agree with you. They said, "I form the light, and create darkness; I make peace, and create evil; I am the LORD, that doeth all these things." (Isaiah 45:7) Amos doesn't either - he said, "Shall the horn be blown in a city, and the people not tremble? Shall evil befall a city, and the LORD hath not done it?" (Amos 3:6)
sonofblessed 2 years ago
That Isaiah passage is referring to judgement of sinners, so evil is better understood as "disaster" as apposed to blessing.
I think the Amos passage can be interpreted that way too.
You can't really say evil is something you can create. It's the absence of obedience to God. While God certainly planned it, He couldn't directly create it. If only out of the definition of evil.
Evil is something that primarily came out of man/angel, which God only uses for His plan.
With all due respect sir!
vincentjdrummer 2 years ago
I looked up the Hebrew and it says "ra'," which means "evil." I would consider your point if you showed me another place in the Tanakh where the word "ra'" is translated as "disaster" and not "evil."
The second thing you said certainly seems true on one level, on a deeper level, everything that exists, even things that God hates, exist because He in some way, shape, or form, has created them.
sonofblessed 2 years ago
Well, yeah, evil is a translation for ra, but so is calamity. Ra is mostly used for " evil", but in this context calamity makes more sense, because it's used as opposite of "peace", not "good'. Btw, there's enough scholars who back this up, because most translations say "calamity' or something alike
vincentjdrummer 2 years ago
@vincentjdrummer Also, see how the word "ra," "evil," is used in Exodus 32:14. This verse demonstrates that God can make evil and that it's not necessarily just an absence of good.
sonofblessed 11 months ago
@sonofblessed שלום יניב. כתוב "אני האור הטופס וליצור החשיכה .... אני עושה השלום וליצור הרע, אני יהוה לעשות האלה ...
gyreenedoc 10 months ago
@vincentjdrummer I agree that "evil" can be rendered "disaster." However, there are sources in Judaism which say that God creates evil, although, as you said, as a means to an end, in which case "evil" would be rendered "disaster." If we were to render evil NOT as disaster but as true evil, we still must say that it is a creation of God, for evil would have no way to exist were God to decide that it shouldn't. God gives the ability for evil although He hates it. Free will.
sonofblessed 11 months ago
If Satan was God's enemy, then he is equal to God in power. If Satan is equal to God in power, then he is another god. If Satan is another god, then there are two gods. Any religion which believes that Satan is equal to God in power is therefore not monotheistic, and therefore Christianity would not be considered a monotheistic religion.
sonofblessed 2 years ago
your statement is quite strange, since when is an opponent equal to someone?
i could play chess versus a grandmaster chess, i would be his enemy, but he would kick my butt. satan is not equal to God in anyway, and most certainly not in power. satan lost the battle by far... there's only one God, Jesus, the Father, and the Holy Spirit. Those who have ears, hear!. God bless
sintje21 2 years ago
Well, yes, if you're talking about normal people then an opponent is not necessary equal to someone. But if you are talking about God, to even be able to issue a challenge to Him implies that God struggled, even if just a little bit, against Satan. That can't really be a theological truth implying an imperfection, even a small one, in God. The difference between two chess players is quantitative, between Satan and God the difference is qualitative; God is the Creator and Satan is created.
sonofblessed 2 years ago
Anyone can issue any challenge versus anyone, first of all, satan challenged God, satan thought he was the same as God or higher, God wooped him. i dont know why God chose to defeat satan the way He did, but He did. He could have destroyed satan in a second i'm sure. But maybe it has to do with God being righteous and Him having ways to handle things, now the punishment for satan is even bigger, eternal pain in hell. God won the battle by far. (quantitative and qualitative have nothing to do)
sintje21 2 years ago
The Torah's view on the limits of Satan's power is stated in Genesis 4:6-7:
"And God said to Cain: 'Why are you angry and why has your countenance fallen? If you do well, shall it not be lifted up? And if do not do well well, sin crouches at the door; its desire is toward you yet you can conquer it.'"
sonofblessed 2 years ago
Little mistake made at ~5 minutes; he did not show how the verse in Deuteronomy refers to the "additions" and "omissions" that he claims the Pharisees made. That's a fallacy. The Torah NEVER mentions HOW to ritually slaughter an animal, but nevertheless tells us to do it. THAT information, not contained anywhere in the Written Torah, is contained in the Oral Torah, which has been passed down from then to now, from Moses to the Pharisees, of which I am proudly one (i.e., Orthodox Jew).
sonofblessed 2 years ago
@sonofblessed I have a question for you as an Orthodox Jew. Is the concept that what happened to Abraham foreshadows what will happen to Israel valid? Is that something that the Orthodox believe and use to uncover more sod level understanding? If so, I would love to hear more examples from you. If so, do you also believe that what happened to Israel foreshadows what will happen to the world, on a world wide scale some day?
elskid206 11 months ago
@elskid206 Well, there is only so much you can say about future events, but parts of Abraham's life are considered models for his descendants' future. Some of this in OUR past but was in his future. For example, Abraham went to Egypt twice, and our tradition teaches that it signified his descendants being enslaved there. The big picture of Abraham as the world's teacher of monotheism is understood as being our universal role as well. Genesis 12:2-3 explains it.
sonofblessed 11 months ago
@elskid206 If you mean Israel as the country, it's not Israel's fate mirrors Abraham's per se but that the Jews' fate mirrors Abraham. Insofar as Israel is Jewish, then there is a relationship. As for your next question, what do you mean by "what happened to Israel?"
sonofblessed 11 months ago
@sonofblessed Agreed Jews as a people not Israel as the nation. Happened to Israel = freed from Egypt. Would you say there is some merit in the concept that there will be future regathering of all "Israel" which would be the equivalent of the 12 brothers living in Egypt? Then the rise of a pharaoh "who does not know Joseph" who will oppress the entire world. Again, setting the stage for a larger degree of the 10 plagues, one involving the whole world - leading to the "second Exodus" of Jer.
elskid206 11 months ago
@elskid206 Nearly impossible to say. It would require us to know what parts of the Exodus serve as the model for end times. I think the second exodus you're talking about refers to events that have already occurred, because the Jews already came back to Israel from Babylon and Assyria. However, there is no doubt that many of Isaiah's prophecies have not yet occurred and speak about end times. The Exodus as a model doesn't mean that they need to mirror the first Exodus in a specific manner.
sonofblessed 11 months ago
Behold, I will send for many fishers, saith HaShem, and they shall fish them; and afterward I will send for many hunters, and they shall hunt them from every mountain, and from every hill, and out of the clefts of the rocks.”
Certainly the return from Babylon is NOT what HaShem is NOW remembered for and Babylon cannot be called “all the countries” and there were no “fishers” and “hunters” involved.
This is clearly a prophesy.
elskid206 11 months ago
@elskid206 It's a prophecy, that's true. It seems to me that Jeremiah 16:1-10 is talking about the sins that caused the Jews to get expelled from Israel, 10-14 to be speaking about their return, and 14-21 to jumping back to talking about the expulsion that is about to happen. Do we know that fishermen and hunters were not the people sent to capture the Jews? Further, it could be that those 2 terms are used to disgrace the Jews by likening them to hunted fish and animals. Now is not NOW.
sonofblessed 11 months ago
@sonofblessed I would have to disagree that the 2 Exodus has occurred. Jeremiah says, “Therefore, behold, the days come, saith HaShem, that it shall no more be said: 'As HaShem liveth, that brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,but: 'As HaShem liveth, that brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the countries whither He had driven them'; and I will bring them back into their land that I gave unto their fathers.
elskid206 11 months ago
@elskid206 It is interesting that the verse says "all the countries." It's tempting to say that God means "all the countries" in which the Jews live now. I don't know enough about this at this time so I can't comment. Hopefully I'll be able to soon.
sonofblessed 11 months ago
@sonofblessed YES!! I think that is EXACTLY what it means. I think in the future (maybe next TUESDAY the way things are going!! LOL) I believe HaShem will awaken all the descendants of Abraham who were dispersed into the world and LOST THEIR IDENTITY. HE will GATHER them. "GATHER" is a HUGE theme in the Tanakh. I believe HaShem will again allow a pharaoh to oppress the world at which point He will supernaturally protest HIS and pour plagues on the rest so that they know HE IS the great I AM.
elskid206 11 months ago
@elskid206 I expect that God will gather the Jews, but I don't totally agree with the Exodus from Egypt being used as the model for the ingathering of the exiles in all its specifities. This is not supported in the text or in Jewish sources.
sonofblessed 11 months ago
@elskid206 I assume you are Jewish with the use of HaShem, but why call the eternal Creator as what would be translated as "the Name", or even Adonai, which is a title that means Sovereign? The Tetragrammaton of yud-heh-vav-heh was never intended to be ineffable as the Orthodox Jews claim. While there is dispute as to its proper pronunciation, with Yahweh as considered the most accurate, I know that a name represents the character and reputation of the one being called by that name.
davegooley 8 months ago
@davegooley I am not "Jewish"; but there is an extraordinary pull on me toward the Jewish people and Israel. I am not sure of your source for the comment that YHVH was never intended to be ineffable. Can you site some references for that? There are several versions of YHVH that I think have merit. I simply stopped using g.o.d. as the Father's name (most often I say "Father") and for the Son I mostly use Yashua. Since j.e.s.u.s is a greek word, and the was no "j", I refuse to use it.
elskid206 8 months ago
@elskid206 in the law of blasphemy, pronounced Hallakah, according to the Orthodox Jews, they deemed that pronouncing the Tetragrammaton was a crime. It was claimed that pagans were blaspheming the eternal Creator's name, so as part of their takanot (tah-kah-note), they made the law that no person was permitted to pronounce His name. One way they reference Him is with haShem. Another way is with Adonai, but usually only through prayers.
davegooley 8 months ago
@davegooley oh yeah you are right. The Father never intended that His Name be forbidden to be spoken. And yes I agree Yahweh is probably most accurate. I am sorry I misread your post.
elskid206 8 months ago
@elskid206 no problem. Yahweh is calling all to return to Him. Regardless of when Yahushua haMashiach returns, we need to be ready always. I learned through Hebrew Roots that Yom Taruah is the most likely appointed day of His return because of the reference "no man knows the day or the hour" since all have to watch for the sliver of the new moon for the appointed day to begin. In addition, the blowing of the shofar is also a clue that leans towards this day as well. His return can be any year.
davegooley 8 months ago
Do you know where i can learn modern Hebrew?
masoncalahan 2 years ago
satan = creator shartan.
god = heavenly creator of all and above
jesus = to see and beat the evil amongst mankind. to cross the faiths of others unto himself.
christ = to cross
adam = gods word to adam = i'll give
eve = eva = a year of
moses = moshes = washing baby boy found in a basket on the river mara with no name.
ne-and-ertal. = looking for greenery = food container.
the list goes on.
inri = king of the jews... wrong!!! IRNI = WRITTEN BE!!
toth1971 2 years ago
how can you say he loved the whole world and preach noahs ark?there are many stories of god ordering the killing of man woman child and livestock sodom and gmorrah he loves the whole world?quite the opposite.
razorback213213213 2 years ago
Do you love murderers? Do you love oppressors? He gave them all warnings and told them to repent. He hates evil. Sodom and Gomorrah were evil murderers,prideful,rapers of people. So why would he love such actions.
ave383 2 years ago 2
you prove my point so again how can you say he loves the whole world?he most certainly does not
razorback213213213 2 years ago
Comment removed
T3hFlyingpizzamuffin 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yea, this also confuses me aswell. He loves the world he created, and loves us...but does he really love EVERYTHING? =/
T3hFlyingpizzamuffin 2 years ago
amen
zirkus88 2 years ago
Thanks for posting this. I have been watching Rico Cortes vids and learning fascinating stuff about harmonics and language. Want to learn more.
LoricaLady 2 years ago
Todah for the teachings...it is much needed.
EzraYisrael1970 2 years ago
Moses name in hebrew is MOSHE
kidanegabriel 3 years ago
Wow... Great Teaching on the Linguistics of Hebrew vs Greek Thinking... Now if the Rest of The Western Church or Assemblies will comprehend this....
doggieboy7 3 years ago 4
Messianic Jews who believe in Yeshua as Moshiach shel Israel. Alleluyah!
teachroge61 3 years ago 3
got it. Thanks. I try to look for it but could not find. Thanks. Me too. Pre-trib boran again, baptist.
hpathik 3 years ago
I wonder if they are Jehowah witness or Mormons? I wonder about their affliation. I would like to know their doctrinal teaching.
hpathik 3 years ago
pre-trib born again Christians, check glc*us*com and About GLC
mytreasure777 3 years ago
Do you think I'd pass in Israel knowing only biblical hebrew? That is, with little knowledge of modern hebrew?
JackPeebly 3 years ago