I remember my 3rd grade teacher trying to explain to the class that the flag waving was actually a metal flag shaped like it was waving. Even at my young age I could tell that he himself didn't believe that.
guys...here is some of the footage of nasa faking the moon landings within a studio... watch?v=_ecBbSIdBKI&feature=related also search "a funny thing happened on the way to the moon"... it shows the crew faking footage of the earth inside the ship
They doesn't need to do this actually i mean the gravitation on the moon is practically weaker than my diabetic grandma and lemme tell ya,she can't even walk by herself and when those guys stab the flag because the gravitation on the moon is really weak it take time for something that is moving to stop moving
Comparing rain to radiation isnt a fair comparison, do you get cancer for looking at a tanning bed once, no but you do if you lay in it too long, the threat of radiation poisoning or long terms effects of exposure rise the longer you are exposed. The relatively small time they were in space, nasa believed would cause no ill effects, however even with all that, the vast majority of the crew members now how radiation induced cataracts
@rich1051414 Lol, NASA says. I'm sure they say a lot. NASA would have us believe sending Astronauts through space at the height of solar activity was entirely under their control, but it's impossible even today to predict exactly when debilitating solar flares will occur. The radiation varies year by year, but even at it's lowest point it's still extremely high. The sun has an eleven year cycle,
@grovegreener The flag moving isn't even relevant. Don't you think that even if they were trying to fake the moon landing, they would cover something up as simple as the flag being blown by wind in space?
@ToolPride and to respond to the 'thin metal case thoery' please research what xrays are and the levels of solar radiation in space, with emphasis on the difference of the two.
@DeadJesus100 You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER dur dur
@DeadJesus100 The sun shines at approximately 20,000 lux. Scientists have thought that you would be able to see stars 100% clearly on the moon due to no atmosphere, but recent studies have shown that since there is no atmosphere, the sun appears much brighter, nearly blinding the astronaut if they didn't have the UV protective lens over their helmet. This is the same effect for why we cant see stars in the city. Not to mention the UV lens also reduces their sight on stars. Anything else?
@DeadJesus100 Do you realize they INTENDED to take pictures of stars from space? And that they have ways of counter acting the sun's affects specifically for that reason? By the way, when pictures of stars are captured, there is a certain time and place to take the photos; when the sun is AWAY from the telescope, on the OTHER side of the Earth. Just because Armstrong couldn't see through his protective lens and the sun, does not disprove the moon landing. Do your research little boy.
@DeadJesus100 Lol what are you talking about? So now you're telling me they took pictures of stars because they didn't have intentions of taking pictures of stars? What? See, the thing about people like you, is that they're extremely close-minded. And fucking stupid. You have this super strong mental set on everything and only take in and accept information that favors your biased point of view. The moon landing happened. Get over it.
@DeadJesus100 NASA AND OTHER SPACE ASSOCIATIONS SPECIFICALLY TAKE PICTURES OF STARS. You sit here and feed me information that the USSR and the Shuttle Discovery took pictures of stars and now you backtrack and say that they weren't intentionally taking pictures of them because they're everywhere? What the hell are you talking about? Try finding ONE picture of the sun and the stars surrounding it without it being edited or enhanced. You won't. Your story makes no sense. Get your facts straight.
@DeadJesus100 Lol, at least I have common sense. Good luck in life with your dumbass ignorant conspiracy theories. Which you don't even actually know shit about. Even I could provide a better argument to why people might think the moon landing was fake than you could, when I don't even agree hahahaha
@DeadJesus100 Are you kidding me kid? That's what this whole argument was about. The sun shines at nearly 20,000 lux and prevents anyone from seeing any stars when shining on them, especially without an atmosphere. It would be like going outside in broad daylight and trying to find stars. 20 bucks says your a liberal pile of shit. You know absolutely nothing about the moon landing, so quit trying to act like you do.
@DeadJesus100 Lol it's the area between the moons orbit. Hahahaha look how pissed off you got because I owned you in an argument about how the moon landing is real. This kid sent me a message asking me to meet him face to face to fight about it. hahahahahaha. Dude grow a pare of balls. You have no information on this at all so you keep trying to insult me. You're obviously just a young kid, but you'll realize one day that you have to accept facts in life and listen to other people too sometimes.
@DeadJesus100 Lol did I not just say that? The moons ORBIT relevant to the Earth. What else would I be fucking talking about? And the constellations Procyon, Hadar, and Vega, contain most of the brightest stars in the sky which are all located in the opposite direction of the sun which Apollo 17 was in the direction for an extended period of time. This doesn't prove that however that armstrong didn't see any stars at all. Nor does this disprove the moon landing what so ever.
@ToolPride LMAO this gay troll needs to change her meds.
Apollo Hoax 11 armstrong said he never saw stars on the whole fake trip
and yet buzz said he did see stars
Armstrongs quote
"The sky is deep black when viewed from the moon as it is when viewed from cislunar space, the space between the earth and the moon. The earth is the only visible object other than the sun that can be seen"
@DeadJesus100 Lol the MOONS ORBIT. What does the moon orbit around? You dumb son of a bitch. And quit acting like people are taking your side. Don't you wonder why everyone's been commenting on your posts saying your a dumbass?
@DeadJesus100 hahahahahahahah You still don't even know that's what I meant. Why don't you re-read those comments down there then think up a good comeback to type up because you obviously don't understand what's even going on lol
@DeadJesus100 Which explains why everyone is commenting on your posts making fun of you. Lol and yeah.. monkey boy.. at least I don't get pissed that i've lost an argument and go asking for someones telephone number and address. Who the fuck does that? hahahaha
@DeadJesus100 Lol.... that's the only thing you have to say isn't it is that monkey shit. Whatever that's supposed to mean. and no, your done asking stupid ass questions that get proven wrong every time. How about you answer this. What are you going to do with your life when NASA develops and constructs a lunar space colony that holds astronaut shifts for 6 months at a time? Answer that one.
The funny thing is there is footage of the flag moving when nobody was touching it. The astronauts would walk by the flag and if you look closely and zoom in you can see the flag moving a little. Just like it would happen here on earth. I think the mythbusters are just in denial and they are just focusing on the evidence they can disprove. They did a survey not too long ago and suprisingly 23% of the american population believe we did not land on the moon.
@gxsrbaby 23% is roughly the population of retarded americans too.Every single theory that IS testable has been tested and proven in favor for the moon landing to be real, if you call that 'focusing on the evidence they can disprove' then who is in denial here?What exactly do you want, them to prove something that isnt even testable?Seems like you are so set on your conspiracy theory it doesn't matter what proof someone comes up with, you will only listen to those favoring what you want to hear.
@rich1051414 The Mythbusters only looked at all the crap pot theories. Why don't they try to prove how the astronauts survived the heavy radiation or how the astronauts and their equipment survived the 250 degree tempature. Isn't it funny at the end they said "Until someone can find footage of the flag moving without it being manipulated by the astronauts, it's busted. there is footage of the flag slightly moving when the astronauts are no where near it.
@gxsrbaby What are you talking about? The suits had 'central heat and air'. Also Even though the radiation is MUCH high in space, it is VERY small on earth, and a small number is still VERY high compared to a VERY small number. Also the White suits and gold plated helmets were not a fashion statement. As far as high the flag moved when 'no one was there' how exactly do we test that without a time machine on the moon, that is untestable 'evidence'...
@rich1051414 The astronauts were using kodak film, and we know how x-rays can manipulate film on earth, and there is an enormous amount of radiation in space. Which would effect the film and when tested the lowest radiation they applied to the film was 25 rem. After they exposed it to the low radiation the pictures were almost completely destroyed. But yet NASA will have us believe that the film survived the heavy radiation in space.
@gxsrbaby First of all, the radiation theory is proof the astronauts did in fact go to the moon, 33 of the 36 astronauts developed early stage cataracts, consistent with radiation exposure. The film was not 'fogged' by radiation because they were stored in metal canisters immediately after shot, preventing radiation fogging. Also film shot from unmanned probes did not receive radiation fogging which you insist is proof it was faked.
@rich1051414 I like to know what your smoking.When you go to the dentist for an x-ray they put a lead shield 2 inches thick to protect you.And your telling me those little metal containers will protect the film from the enormous amount of radiation in space? We can go back and forth all day and your going to believe what you want. Maybe they should put that to the test put some film in some thin layer of metal and expose that to extreme level of radiation and see what happens, lol.
@gxsrbaby then give me one logical conclusion why radiation fogging did not occur on the Lunar Orbiter and Luna 3? those were unmanned, used the same film and development techniques, and did not receive radiation fogging. I would love for them to test it, but as far as my place on it, i am not even convinced this is even a legitimate argument
@rich1051414 between the earth and the moon it's called the van allen radiation belt look it up. They say the radiation is over 900 rem, which is more than enough to kill anybody. NASA said they survived the radiation, because they moved fast through it. But that's like saying if you run in rain you won't get as wet. Through the belt the film and the astronaunts were exposed to this radiation for 4 hours. Look it up.
@rich1051414 And if your thinking the Apollo capsule will protect them the answere is no.They made it as thin and light as possible. NASA made no attempt to protect the astronauts and their equipment of any levels of radiation.
@gxsrbaby the major radiation threat was caused by solar flares, and they intentionally chose a time when the threat of the solar flares was the lowest. Your argument is invalid that NASA mode no attempt to protect astronauts when a single google search will return tons of papers made public of the measures they took to protect the astronauts from radiation, including a built in dosimeter to measure accumulative skin dose.
@rich1051414 and every eleven years it appears to repeat. So every eleven years there's a peak of sun spot activity.This is associated with a peak of solor radiation. One of the peaks was in 1969 and 1970 right when the appollo missions was supposed to flown through them. They could not have picked a worst time to send a man to the moon.
@gxsrbaby No one is arguing it was a solar maximum, but it was forecasted to be calm, and 7 solar flares were recorded. They actually have to hit the spacecraft, not just dump charged particles into the solar wind to muck with radio reflection in the ionosphere (which is one way flares make life miserable down here).
@rich1051414 You do understand there are other sources of radiation other than solar flares, and within the belt there are always a constant level of radiation. I know NASA has an excuse and answere for everything, but with as many people believing we did not land on the moon you would think somebody somewhere would put things like this to the test. But no we get people like Mythbusters trying to explain shadows.
@rich1051414 Just for the sake of argument, let's just pretend the astronauts survived through the heavy radiation, and a miracle happened. There is so much evidence that we didn't land on the moon, that I cannot fit on here. Try to explain why the film did not get damaged between the radiation and the tempature. It was 250 degrees on the moon and film melts at a 150. They must of had one hell of an air conditioner up there.
@gxsrbaby 2 things. 1: Are you a physicist, engineer, astronaut, or a sort of interplanetary expert? Any degrees saying you're a well versed expert? You just gonna read what you see on the internet and believe it instantly? 2: Why in the hell does it matter?
@MetalGearRexPilot People are always trying to make video's explaining why the shadows are going different ways, and why there are no stars in the sky, etc. But nobody is trying to explain the real evidence, and the reason why that is they simply can't. We don't have the technology to send a man to the moon today let alone 40 years ago. You don't need to be a scientist to know the radiation in space. I hope one day we do go to the moon. But we don't have the technology yet.
@MetalGearRexPilot And by the way they say at the end of this video "Until someone can find video of the flag moving without it being manipulated by astronauts, it's busted". Mythbusters obviously didn't do their research well enough. Because there is video of the flag waving a little without the astronauts touching it. But obviously they are not going to put that on t.v.
@gxsrbaby But this is not the same thing as saying the generalized radiation environment was deadly. The generalized radiation environment is survivable. So are the VAB, for at least short periods. Energetic solar events are in the same class as meteoroids; if one strikes you, it is bad news, but you have to work the ACTUAL probabilities of one striking you, which is quite low.
@rich1051414 Why don't Mythbusters get some film like the astronauts used, and expose it to very low radiation and see how the pictures turn out. But no they are just going to explain sand and shadows. I am not one to believe in conspiracey theories, but there is just way too much evidence suggesting that we did not land on the moon
@gxsrbaby Why don't Mythbusters get some film like the astronauts used, and expose it to very low radiation and see how the pictures turn out. But no they are just going to explain sand and shadows. I am not one to believe in conspiracey theories, but there is just way too much evidence suggesting that we did not land on the moon.
@gxsrbaby As i said in my earlier post, Lunar Orbiter and Luna 3 both did not recieve radiation fogging which also used on board development processes.
I lhink that this experience is nowhere close to explain the movement of the flag. the flag was shaking and moving from side to completly the other side even when no one is shaking it . so that one remain unexplained for me
Ok, see this video you understand my point of view: bDnWwFR2ZuI
See the player jump in the sand very like the astronauts, see this happen on earth not in the moon. In the movies you see very like these video. Imagine in the moon there are no water droplets, no humidity. How it works like on earth. The stones are not humid to glue to the astronauts feet. If you know science you know these is not possible on the moon! There are sand glued to the camera the astronaut is hanging, this is impossible
Nasa used controlled rovers, because they have technology to do it, if they controlled the apollo they will doit no problem. There are the test with the lander that was not sucessfull and the pilot had to eject himself from the lander. This test show how difficult to maneuver the lander! I believe you are pissoff because there are a lot of mistakes. I will see this is true one day. Like we see FBI show we are right about the Roswell cover up.
I live in a country that we learned all fucking governments do illusions to you believe in you country, no matters it is a big or small country all are full of liars. Maybe in a future you really learn they do this for you behave like you do. The Mythbusters showed to me that moonlanding is a fake. I really know science, dont say to me i donot know is just about cover up. I believe men moonlanding and not the case of Neil Amstrong! If more prove come up i change my opinion, but now i prefer wait
See before shoot me! You must know NASA did not a fligt test for the astronauts. Moonlanding was very risk to the astronauts they used rover and small controlled robots to put the laser reflector. Why they never go back to the moon? They havent any proofs to show people they really landed on the moon! Films an pictures is possible to do fakes. Se the films above and believe moonlanding was a hoax. Maybe NASA has some good proof than pictures or movies. I believe in science, but not in NASA,FBI.
If NASA used "small controlled robots" then I'll expect you to prove it. What robots? Robots made with blueprints you dont have? Built by engineers you dont know? Launched on a date you cant name in a rocket no one saw? THOSE robots? You cant just make up a story as you go.
You know of 'No proofs?" Then you're ignorant. We have moonrocks, we have the Japan LRO pics just to name two.
@SpreadingtheMuse Is easy to prove, Mars Spirit and Opportunity robots. NASA did it I can prove to you showing a video camera that shot the landers leaving moon, you can see it was made by a camera on the moon see this video and you never say is old primitive paranoia.
rKDZmLJZVcg
The problem with people like you is that you think everybody is stupid! I have more proofs if you want i show.
Stop thinkig we are stupid. NASA always was liars, about UFOS about cover ups, you know is true.
@rogodoy12 Errr, spirit and opportunity are made with 90's tech, and cant pick up anything heavy, let alone pick up and place one perfectly. The mars rovers cant even blast off with mars rocks NOW, let alone 40 years ago. THATS the extent of your education? "Well they're both robots therefore they're the same in every way?" WTF kind of newb argument is that?
@SpreadingtheMuse You are stupid and blind, did you see this film? rKDZmLJZVcg
Moon rovers are big than Mars rovers! Give me the proof NASA did not used rovers. My education is good i know very well about science, moon, earth. I can give more proofs if you want that NASA used rovers in the time the man fake moonlanding, is every where, mistakes. I allready showed a sample movie with a robot camera panning the moon, if you stupid and blind is not my problem!
@rogodoy12 You say you have proof? OK, I want some schematics and documents on the alleged moon rovers NASA built. I want interviews with the engineers who built the things.
I looked up your link, we know the lunar rover camera could be remote controlled from Earth. Hell, we know at that time the USSR had the Lunokhod rovers then.
That isn't evidence NASA had a rover like Lunokhod or Spirit MER on the moon.
Also, look up logic, you can't prove a negative. The burden of proof is yours
@loperspest Ha you have got it. NASA had it. Remember that NASA never will put a astronaut in the moon if the space program did not have tested. NASA hinded these tests and use maneuvered landers. If you see the moonlander rover the astronaut is like a stiff puppet. Anouther thing very important: where they placed the rover in the lander? NASA had tv on that time, camera controled by hand, they have small tv cameras. Why NASA never showed the moon test to the public? Because they used for real !
@loperspest Stolen from Nazi, maybe they change a bit, but stolen. They dont need to fake because they used from test site on are 51!! A lot of films prove they did there. You can see how many things the astronaut put on the surface of the moon, how they packed every objects, the rovers, the antenas, the astronauts, the retroprojectors, some other things, apollo must be huge to put all the stuff
You say Apollo was filmed at Area 51 at Groom Lake But if you look at the area, it's nothing like the moon, been the wrong colour and covered in scrub.
tinyurl*com/gro0mlk
US and Nazii engineers worked together, it was a Juno rocket that launched Explorer, but how does this prove an Apollo hoax?
They stored a lot of equipment in Quads folded up and packed tight.
tinyurl*com/6ocvky2
You keep insisting NASA had robotic rovers, but have not shown any evidence they did, where's the photos?
@loperspest I all ready showed movies to you, the problem with you is that you think i am stupid. There are a lot of evidences they used robotic rovers. Why me have to show the proofs? Did ever go to the cinema watch some films? Area 51, the fucking place you want fake you do on earth in your garden. Do you want i admit that Neil amstrong put his fucking feet on the moon?Fuck off! Maybe others put the feet there not Neil amstrong! They did that for win the war against russians!
@loperspest You need to see the movies about robotic cameras in the moon. I allready put my ideas on the comments, if want to dicuss go to Neil Amstrong and ask him! Hi is alive this proves that he never went to the moon! if so he allready dead! If you does not know space is dangerous for human body. Because there are to much radiation from the sun. If he went there he was dead right now!
It's not design papers, it's not photos of its construction, it's no evidence at all of a robotic rover run by NASA, all it proves is the camera on the moon buggy could be remote controlled.
I knew this already.
You're wrong about radiation.
The Soviets sent probes to see if a manned mission was survivable.
Their findings?
"Seven-day flights along the trajectories of Zond-5 and 7 probes are safe from the radiation point of view."
@loperspest John Lenard Walson Doyou know this guy he does movies from the moon from down earth. If he does these movies if good quality why NASA with large telescopes does not do from the moonlanding sites. Because it is fake! They have tecnology to do nice movies from good telescopes they have. Why they don do do eny pictures from earth, if this guy do why Nasa didnt?
You are wrong! you are losing you brain, saying radiation does not affect the astronauts! even us here on earth are!
@loperspest A remoto control is the same for a moving robot probe! Dont lose your mind. Radiation depends on the Sun winds. Could be dangerous or not, but as far i know, space is really a dangerous place, you know a lot o astronauts from olds missions to space are deads now by cancer: Why Neil Amstrong did not died? He is 80's now probably he goes forever! *___* What about Buzz Aldrin he is 81, probably he is not affected by radiation too! Liars how you believe in this, is a fucking fake!
.Radiation levels are indeed higher in space than most places on Earth, but they only went up for a short period of time. A relatively short exposure means a smaller dose and a much less likely chance of health issues later in life.
Many old people get cancer, it's not surprising at least a few astronauts did.
And no, a remote controlled camera is not a robotic rover. It is only proof of itself.
I can show the LM, CSM, and Saturn V under construction, got any for your robotic rover?
@animidia Because the Solar wind isnt constant, dumbass. The sun ebbs and flows like everything else. Plus, its obvious you just cut and pasted "radiation" with zero education. Radiation comes in all shapes and sizes. Alpha beta gamma to name only 3. Different kinds, different strengths, different dangers. The solar wind is alpha and beta radiation. BOTH kinds are blocked by plastic. Only Gamma needs lead.
There are the regoliths problema whem the astronauts jumps, the regoliths and dust jump it them, supposing they are in the moon: no water droplets and no air! Why the regoliths go up as they jump. Since no water on sand. If you see on the beach if you jump the sand jumps with you feet very like in the jump of the astronauts, this show the sand on the moon is mixed with water! If you know science there are not water on the moon, how thee regoliths is glued to astronaut feet.
@loperspest Do you believe everything NASA say? They did in the past: they stolen german rocket program from the NAZIs, they had allready spy on Russians rocket program, the same russian spy on americans. NASA has alien technology, you can see some proofs over Google Earth in area 51, not engines, but signs they did on the ground!FBI released the Roswell documents that they have alien technology. All liars! What planet you are? We are in a planet governed by illuminatis that use ilusinism.
@loperspest Ilusionism is like the Mythbusters do, every thing they say you believe, because they say is true. I believe NASA went to the moon, i am not saying this, i am saying the first moonlanding did not existed, because they have'nt time to do that. They put astronauts on space without training. It was a suicide mission!You know that are a lot of problems to do that, no chance the astronauts coming back. Anouther idea: where is the tests from the astronauts filmed by NASA?
@loperspest Where is the original films from the first mission. NASA said they lost al the movies, they erased by mistake. HAHAHA, how stupid this is. Erased, lost, anything is a fucking lie, because it is very compromising the films. I know there are a lot of mistakes on the films, because they blured parts of the films. Now they want no fly zones over the sites on the moon. Why? just to know someday the lie will finish. You believe in Santa claus?
@animidia Hey i am not trying to prove anything, dont say my education is bad, is not about education, is about cover up! There is alot of mistakes on the moonlanding, is not the shadows and not the flags. Is about cover up, americans government is filled if liars. They fake to you believe. I am not saying all the space program is fake, probably you think that, i know there is a good space program, but the first moonlanding was a fake to me!! No matters you ofends my inteligence or my integrity
@rogodoy12 There's NOTHING you can show me which hasnt already been seen, ridiculed and laughed at LONG before you came here begging for attention ;) Nothing you've posted proves any "hoax" in the slightest. IF the rovers were too big to go on the LEM then we should have heard that 40 YEARS AGO by actual engineers who work for a living, not hoax newbs 4 decades too late. NASA published the blueprints for god sake.
Your "education" at Mcds is a piss poor substitute for real experience ;)
@rogodoy12 Moon rovers picked up moonrocks? "Picked up" which our rovers cant even do today? Its about robot control dumbass, not size. 1969 didnt have the robot tech for ANY delicate work. Quote me ANY robot in 69 that could do what you say they could.
Plus, What rovers? Rovers built with blueprints you dont have?
By engineers you cant name?
Built in a factory no one saw?
THOSE rovers? LOL Thank god you can just make up your story as you go. Else you'd look stupid ;)
just see these videos! They are very good, showing how easy to do fakes. I can show some photos about NASA machines for make astronauts walking on the moon, See the Walt Disney film: 20000 Leagues under the Sea (1954) to see how they have all technology to do the fake they filmed under the water and make pictures in the studio. The films atmosfere is equal inside water tank and the photos was made using a photograph studio, becaus no need zero gravity machines.
@animidia There's nothing in the apollo footage that looks anything like underwater footage. You havent named a single professional movie-maker who says "that looks like underwater footage." Again, you're just making up a story as you go.
This flag test is really stupid because you can see it moving like crazy, there are one filme the displacemente of air whem the astronaut pass beside the flag it start to move is very convincing that the flag is flaping. I find this video of Mythbusters too americans dream! I believe will laught a lot when all this lie about moon landing will finish, in the same way i am very happy with FBI cocuments about Roswell case is finish. I think is better assume the error than try explain it!
Somebody blocked my comments! Is really funny that the cover up about UFO is supported by the people, in the same way they use this Mysthbusters to do what they want that is hind the real true about NASA cover up. I know they went to space and just maybe they did the moonlanding, but if see there are a lot of mistakes, not one but a lot. Musthbuster just prooved is possible do it here on earth. Why NASA did not moonlanded in these years, because is to risk, to dangerous!
Ok, now I all ready sent a letter to Mythbusters to create a enviroment to shoot some pictures with the camera the astronaut used with a photograph film in the moon they never asnwered my letters. What about that? Int the enviroment with hot and cold the film never survive!
@rogodoy12 You do realize that, from a thermal control perspective, low earth orbit is pretty much the same, right? Are you claiming those photos are fake also?
There is several reasons the film survived.
1: They went in the lunar morning, the moon is cooler in the lunar morning.
2: The cameras and film magazines were silvered, to reflect away heat radiation.
3: In a vacuum the only means of transferring heat is by heat radiation.
This is why a Thermos is so good at keeping things hot or cold.
@loperspest In vaccum there are no mild temperature, just in the shadows. To use the camera they have to be at mild temperature, this is not possible in a vacuum, or is hot or is cold. The problem with this is that they never wil prove for me because i know it was a fake. There are a lot of mistake like this every where. This camera mistake is the problem, because in another film they put a cover on the camera, why they did that because nobody can prove. Is like you lie about youself, who nows?
Low Earth orbit is also a vacuum. So you are claiming every photograph taken in earth orbit on EVA is fake, from every nation that has done so? That is a big hoax. Why would all these people lie to support an alleged hoax that only benefits the USA?
And you are wrong, lunar morning is cooler because the sun angle is different.
@loperspest i learned and i know is fake with you believe i s you problem i know science, morning in a vacuum is hot! if is at shadow it will a litle bit cooler, you have much to learn, you must know hot is hot in vacuum and in that morning the sun was very high.
Even if that were so, the sun angle makes a huge difference as shown in the link with the Stefan–Boltzmann law, why do you think a Thermos, also known as a vacuum flask or a Dewar flask, keeps things inside the same temperature?
There is a layer of vacuum and inside is silvered. The cameras and the film cases were silvered and the moon is a vacuum, making the moon one big Thermos as far as temperature change is concerned, so all that heat wouldn't have affected the film much.
@loperspest I am sorry will keep trying convence me but i will wait for any more experience that trully show real that the vacuum is hot or cold every where since the absence of air and wind. That was the mistake they did because that time nobody will argue about that. NASA uses illusionism for fake things, in the same way they cover up ufo images. I believe man went to the moon, but this possibility is real, because the conspiracy theorists were right about Roswell case, FBI fully documented!
@rogodoy12 If this was true, a Thermos wouldn't work. A Thermos does work, so you're wrong. What part of this are you not getting? If a Thermos can keep your drink cold, despite warm surroundings, then Apollo astronauts could keep their film cool. If it is reflected away, where is the heat going to come from in a vacuum?
Not to mention Earth Orbit is also a vacuum. Film is not the only thing that doesn't react well to very low or high temperatures, what of Earth orbit astronauts & cosmonauts?
@loperspest I am not discussing about astronaut vessels, just about the camera and the film. I know you undestand very well, but if you really know about you are saying you know that NASA said that small sand regolits was found in the loans of the astronauts. This was public notified. How can regolits go inside the loans of the astronauts? Because this is a lie! Try to find about this and you probably not know about this little problem!
@rogodoy12 The what? The loans? That isn't a body part, that is monetary transaction. What are you talking about? If you are going to use the language to communicate, learn to use English better. I am Canadian, rogodoy12, so going off about the USA really has no business in this discussion.
Why does it matter if we are talking astronauts or film? Both are sealed containers in a vacuum that had to keep the contents at a reasonable temperature. If NASA can keep astronauts cool, why not film?
@loperspest Ok i have trying discuss if you, if you are candian try learn a good english yourself, maybe loose some school teaching about education. I am off, please do not comnent anymore. PLEASE I AM OFF, NO COMMENTS! DID YOU UNDERSTAND. I AM NOT ENGLISH AMERICAN OR CANADIAN I AM NOT DUMB!! I AM NOT STUPID I LEARNED ENGLISH, I SPEAK LESS THAN YOU BUT I AM PROUD NO TO BE DUMB LIKE YOU!
probably you never know what i am triyng to say because some people are removing my comments. Ibelieve there are no difference in Cuba than USA! Because in Cuba they do censorship to the citizans the same they do in USA, no difference. You never understand new ideas. You believe in everything. If they say is true you believe this is brainwashing!! I am pity of americans, it is not about science or physics is about cover up. Bye
@SpreadingtheMuse No, every one. If you try to discuss i showed to you that there are a lot of mistakes on the moonlanding hoax. The problem is that NASA brainwashed people about the moonlanding hoax, no matter i say makes no difference. Is simple understand:Why NASA wont go there and show it is true? This is the main point. I know you probably will say they have no interests on the moon! Conspiracy theorists were right about FBI cover up, all the documents are in FBI web page.
@animidia "brainwashing" Inventing ANOTHER conspiracy as proof of your first conspiracy only proves how desperately stupid your evidence is for both. Again, you cant make up your story as you go.
@SpreadingtheMuse A believe not all conspiracy theorists are right, because lack some knowledge of science. But if you investigate seriously you will find a lot of mistakes in the pictures and in the movies. Is not about film effects, this is prooved by Mythbusters that it is possible do the effects, see the movie Mythbusters about men walking on the moon they did here on earth for real! See that this prove NASA hoax. I can show you a lot of mistakes if you want. I will leave for the future.
@animidia If there are any flaws, I've never seen them pointed out by anyone who knew what they were talking about. What i have seen are rank amateurs making idiots of themselves with "This pic is wrong cause...blah blah" being ignorant of something in 8th grade science.
@loperspest I am just velieve moonlanding is a hoax, just that, i did not say every picture is a hoax, you are putting words on my mouth. I dont know if others moonlanding was fake, but the first with Neil amstrong, was a fake. Any way we can't prove that, because NASA uses all kind of fakes to prove conspiracy theorists are wrong, is a battle with the liars against who wants the real truth. You can believe in anything don try to make me believe that, you have no knowledge to convince me!Sorry.
@animidia "NASA uses all kinds of fakes" Then we'll expect you to prove that, not just throw around unproven conspiracies as proof of other conspiracies.
These guys are just humoring the conspracy dorks. They knew, as anyone with basic physics knowledge would know, what the outcome would be. Every pathetic argument that the conspracy dorks come up with are easily debunked by intelligent people. What a waste of time and energy and an insult to the brilliant and brave souls that took us to the moon and back.
There isn't any resistance in space of course it’s going to wave around until it lose momentum conspiracy theorists trip me out sometime. They believe were being visited by aliens but don’t think we visited the moon talking about oxy morons
obviously the mythbuster crew are on one side only, to really prove all this we need to go to the moon and do the test o verthere to be 100% sure, what's next they gonna make busted 9/11?
Ok, here's a question to all the conspiracy theroists out there: If NASA faked the landing on the moon, how did they manage to keep quiet everyone that was involved in faking it? We are not talking about keeping two or three people quiet but we are talking about over 100.000 people. How come NONE of them ever said: "Ok guys, we totally faked the moon landing"?
Van allen Raidation belts??? If they did exsist, the same suit the Astronaunts wore in 1968 would be able to with stand Chernobyl and the Japan Fukushema disaster, since space Radiation and Nuke Raiation are the same..... What Im saying is since the Van allen belts are real, and no human has ever put on any such suit to venture into such badly radeated sights, then YES THE CONSPIRACY IS TRUE. WENT NEVER WENT TO THE MOON.
RADIATION is a big scary word newbs hear on TV and then repeat, pretending to sound smart. And here you are ;)
Radiation is in space? What kind? Alpha Radiation? Gamma? Arent they totally different kinds? Only gamma needs lead? But Alpha can be blocked by plastic? And space is full of ALPHA? You mean thats not taught in every radiation safety class? Like the classes you've never had, but still mouth off like an idiot about? ;)
of course we went to the moon, thats a dumb conspiracy. i hate the word conspiracy bc it instantly makes ppl laugh at alt ideas. i think that 9.11 was an inside job...wtc7... and that JFK was not murdered by lee oswald ( i know oswald was in texas that day, and that he did fire his gun, i just dont think it was the fatal shot that blew jfks head onto his trunk)
@TTV5 They are annoying, they totally ignore all evidence to prove the moon landing and churn out the same debunked hoax theories parrot fashion. Some of them are moslem and hate America, they all share a distrust even paranoia of the American government. I have been told by them that NASA controls You Tube and Wikipedia.
@2camjohn you are either a troll or an idiot-dihydrogen monoxide is water-H20! I hope you actually get the joke and don`t actually believe this obvious hoax.
I remember my 3rd grade teacher trying to explain to the class that the flag waving was actually a metal flag shaped like it was waving. Even at my young age I could tell that he himself didn't believe that.
airtioteclint 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
guys...here is some of the footage of nasa faking the moon landings within a studio... watch?v=_ecBbSIdBKI&feature=related also search "a funny thing happened on the way to the moon"... it shows the crew faking footage of the earth inside the ship
macdaddylives 2 weeks ago
They doesn't need to do this actually i mean the gravitation on the moon is practically weaker than my diabetic grandma and lemme tell ya,she can't even walk by herself and when those guys stab the flag because the gravitation on the moon is really weak it take time for something that is moving to stop moving
i'm not trying to be a wise guy here so whatever
wisudiva 3 weeks ago
@wisudiva didn't you just watch this video?
Weedgrindr 3 weeks ago
Comparing rain to radiation isnt a fair comparison, do you get cancer for looking at a tanning bed once, no but you do if you lay in it too long, the threat of radiation poisoning or long terms effects of exposure rise the longer you are exposed. The relatively small time they were in space, nasa believed would cause no ill effects, however even with all that, the vast majority of the crew members now how radiation induced cataracts
rich1051414 1 month ago
@rich1051414 Lol, NASA says. I'm sure they say a lot. NASA would have us believe sending Astronauts through space at the height of solar activity was entirely under their control, but it's impossible even today to predict exactly when debilitating solar flares will occur. The radiation varies year by year, but even at it's lowest point it's still extremely high. The sun has an eleven year cycle,
gxsrbaby 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrHarry567 1 month ago
ignoring earths gravitational pull :/?
warfl4g 1 month ago
The flag moved a lot more than in this "experiment."
grovegreener 1 month ago
@grovegreener The flag moving isn't even relevant. Don't you think that even if they were trying to fake the moon landing, they would cover something up as simple as the flag being blown by wind in space?
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride and to respond to the 'thin metal case thoery' please research what xrays are and the levels of solar radiation in space, with emphasis on the difference of the two.
rich1051414 1 month ago
@rich1051414 I think you have the wrong person
ToolPride 4 weeks ago
@ToolPride sorry bout that
rich1051414 4 weeks ago
@ToolPride the apollo troll empoloyed by the Idiot Homosexual Phil Plait
has 100% brain damage
MYTHBUSTER PROPAGANDA JEW PIGS
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
MYTHBUSTER MORONS
PROPAGANDA JEW HOMOSEXUALS
APOLLO MICKEY MOUSE
1968-1972
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
MYTHYBUSTER MORONS
Nasa's Paid jew whores
APOLLO DISNEY
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 lol Forgot to take your Zoloff?
fyourcouchnigga 1 month ago
These Jew Homosexual mythbuster morons should be sent to prison
for spreading lies on the internet
Apollo Fraud
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Lol why call me a retard for something that is almost clearly undeniable
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride
APOLLO HOAX OF THE CENTURY
Why did armstrong the faker say he never saw stars in cislunar space?
Prove that you are not a retard and answer the question lol
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a limp-dick You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER You are a lying QUEER dur dur
staIkervisions 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 The sun shines at approximately 20,000 lux. Scientists have thought that you would be able to see stars 100% clearly on the moon due to no atmosphere, but recent studies have shown that since there is no atmosphere, the sun appears much brighter, nearly blinding the astronaut if they didn't have the UV protective lens over their helmet. This is the same effect for why we cant see stars in the city. Not to mention the UV lens also reduces their sight on stars. Anything else?
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride the mental retard TROLL
USSR took pictures of stars from space
Shuttle Discovery took pictures in colour of stars from space
Apollo 16 faked and edited in pics of stars
You are sick in the head lying moron
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Do you realize they INTENDED to take pictures of stars from space? And that they have ways of counter acting the sun's affects specifically for that reason? By the way, when pictures of stars are captured, there is a certain time and place to take the photos; when the sun is AWAY from the telescope, on the OTHER side of the Earth. Just because Armstrong couldn't see through his protective lens and the sun, does not disprove the moon landing. Do your research little boy.
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride One does not have to INTEND to take pictures from space you fucking retard. There are Trillions of stars in space
You should be in a mental asylum
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Lol what are you talking about? So now you're telling me they took pictures of stars because they didn't have intentions of taking pictures of stars? What? See, the thing about people like you, is that they're extremely close-minded. And fucking stupid. You have this super strong mental set on everything and only take in and accept information that favors your biased point of view. The moon landing happened. Get over it.
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride SHIT FOR BRAINS
Lol dude you are mentallt retarded.
There are Trillions of stars in space and so when you take photis stars will appear
no matter if you look for them or not
Take your medication freak
APOLLO NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 NASA AND OTHER SPACE ASSOCIATIONS SPECIFICALLY TAKE PICTURES OF STARS. You sit here and feed me information that the USSR and the Shuttle Discovery took pictures of stars and now you backtrack and say that they weren't intentionally taking pictures of them because they're everywhere? What the hell are you talking about? Try finding ONE picture of the sun and the stars surrounding it without it being edited or enhanced. You won't. Your story makes no sense. Get your facts straight.
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride You are a TOOL
Even Nasa would not dare use your retarded excuses you demented freak
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Lol, at least I have common sense. Good luck in life with your dumbass ignorant conspiracy theories. Which you don't even actually know shit about. Even I could provide a better argument to why people might think the moon landing was fake than you could, when I don't even agree hahahaha
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride the TOOL
Lol you are a retard, how can you have common sense?
Okay let me show youtubers that you are a moron.
Tell us why did armstrong say he never saw stars from cislunar space?
Would you like his quote and video retard?
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Are you kidding me kid? That's what this whole argument was about. The sun shines at nearly 20,000 lux and prevents anyone from seeing any stars when shining on them, especially without an atmosphere. It would be like going outside in broad daylight and trying to find stars. 20 bucks says your a liberal pile of shit. You know absolutely nothing about the moon landing, so quit trying to act like you do.
ToolPride 1 month ago
Comment removed
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Lol it's the area between the moons orbit. Hahahaha look how pissed off you got because I owned you in an argument about how the moon landing is real. This kid sent me a message asking me to meet him face to face to fight about it. hahahahahaha. Dude grow a pare of balls. You have no information on this at all so you keep trying to insult me. You're obviously just a young kid, but you'll realize one day that you have to accept facts in life and listen to other people too sometimes.
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride LOL the retard can not spell "Grow a pare of balls"
Apollo faggot :)
Cislunar space is the space between the earth and the moon moron
Now explain to us why armstrong said he never stars and buzz said he did
They were on the same fake apollo 11 mission RETARD
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Lol did I not just say that? The moons ORBIT relevant to the Earth. What else would I be fucking talking about? And the constellations Procyon, Hadar, and Vega, contain most of the brightest stars in the sky which are all located in the opposite direction of the sun which Apollo 17 was in the direction for an extended period of time. This doesn't prove that however that armstrong didn't see any stars at all. Nor does this disprove the moon landing what so ever.
ToolPride 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ToolPride LMAO this gay troll needs to change her meds.
Apollo Hoax 11 armstrong said he never saw stars on the whole fake trip
and yet buzz said he did see stars
Armstrongs quote
"The sky is deep black when viewed from the moon as it is when viewed from cislunar space, the space between the earth and the moon. The earth is the only visible object other than the sun that can be seen"
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@ToolPride TOOL queer ran away . Lol this troll has no idea what cislunar space is
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Lol the MOONS ORBIT. What does the moon orbit around? You dumb son of a bitch. And quit acting like people are taking your side. Don't you wonder why everyone's been commenting on your posts saying your a dumbass?
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride Cilsunra space is the space between the moon and the earth you fucking idiot. Were you born with brain damage faggot?
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 hahahahahahahah You still don't even know that's what I meant. Why don't you re-read those comments down there then think up a good comeback to type up because you obviously don't understand what's even going on lol
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride No one on planet earth knows what you mean dickhead
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 And quit sending me messages asking for my address because you've lost an argument. How immature is that?
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride lost an argument ? LOL i am making you look like the moron you are monkey boy
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Which explains why everyone is commenting on your posts making fun of you. Lol and yeah.. monkey boy.. at least I don't get pissed that i've lost an argument and go asking for someones telephone number and address. Who the fuck does that? hahahaha
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride All you apollo trolls are morons, dumbasses
I have destroyed you on this video you coward :)
Let me ask you another question shit for brains
What protects the moon from cosmic radiation?
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@ToolPride
"Do it. See what I what I do with it."
What kind of monkey english is that retard?
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@ToolPride im just scaring the shit out of you fagTroll
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Lol yeah. I gave you my number for you to call and you haven't called yet. Who's scared again? Pussy.
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride The only pussy you have ever seen in your life is your mothers monkey pussy.
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 Lol.... that's the only thing you have to say isn't it is that monkey shit. Whatever that's supposed to mean. and no, your done asking stupid ass questions that get proven wrong every time. How about you answer this. What are you going to do with your life when NASA develops and constructs a lunar space colony that holds astronaut shifts for 6 months at a time? Answer that one.
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride Come on monkey brain lets discuss the Fake moon landings
Ever wonder why the ISS is 220 miles from earth dickbreath?
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 What the hell is that supposed to mean? How is that relevant to the lunar colony program in any way shape or form?
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride monkey brain :)
Why is the ISS 220 miles from earth?
Thats the only space coclony Nazi Nasa has developed you moron
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ToolPride we all know that you have brain damage.
BUzz the clown said he saw stars in cislunar space and armstrong the faker said he never saw stars
Do you know what cislunar space menas retard? lol
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@ToolPride is probably the dumbest troll on youtube :)
And considering that there are morons trolling youtube that is quiet an achievement :)
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
@DeadJesus100 first you are probably wrong but what does being jewish or gay have to do with anything?
unholychunk 1 month ago
Comment removed
huyquenota 1 month ago
Comment removed
huyquenota 1 month ago
Theres no fiction ppl... the energy (WHEN THEY INSTALLED IT they touched it.. giving it energy) is preserved.... so it keeps moving..
okkevin123 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why is there stars visible in soviet pictures taken from the lunar surface but not in american pictures?
gardiner1986 2 months ago
mythbuster propaganda queer pigs
Fake Apollo
The joke of history
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
@DeadJesus100 yeah man. Holocaust must of not happened either right.
ToolPride 1 month ago
@ToolPride fucking retard
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
The funny thing is there is footage of the flag moving when nobody was touching it. The astronauts would walk by the flag and if you look closely and zoom in you can see the flag moving a little. Just like it would happen here on earth. I think the mythbusters are just in denial and they are just focusing on the evidence they can disprove. They did a survey not too long ago and suprisingly 23% of the american population believe we did not land on the moon.
gxsrbaby 2 months ago
@gxsrbaby Why would this survey be relevant?
larsiemannen 2 months ago
@gxsrbaby 23% is roughly the population of retarded americans too.Every single theory that IS testable has been tested and proven in favor for the moon landing to be real, if you call that 'focusing on the evidence they can disprove' then who is in denial here?What exactly do you want, them to prove something that isnt even testable?Seems like you are so set on your conspiracy theory it doesn't matter what proof someone comes up with, you will only listen to those favoring what you want to hear.
rich1051414 1 month ago
@rich1051414 The Mythbusters only looked at all the crap pot theories. Why don't they try to prove how the astronauts survived the heavy radiation or how the astronauts and their equipment survived the 250 degree tempature. Isn't it funny at the end they said "Until someone can find footage of the flag moving without it being manipulated by the astronauts, it's busted. there is footage of the flag slightly moving when the astronauts are no where near it.
gxsrbaby 1 month ago
@gxsrbaby What are you talking about? The suits had 'central heat and air'. Also Even though the radiation is MUCH high in space, it is VERY small on earth, and a small number is still VERY high compared to a VERY small number. Also the White suits and gold plated helmets were not a fashion statement. As far as high the flag moved when 'no one was there' how exactly do we test that without a time machine on the moon, that is untestable 'evidence'...
rich1051414 1 month ago
@rich1051414 The astronauts were using kodak film, and we know how x-rays can manipulate film on earth, and there is an enormous amount of radiation in space. Which would effect the film and when tested the lowest radiation they applied to the film was 25 rem. After they exposed it to the low radiation the pictures were almost completely destroyed. But yet NASA will have us believe that the film survived the heavy radiation in space.
gxsrbaby 1 month ago
@gxsrbaby First of all, the radiation theory is proof the astronauts did in fact go to the moon, 33 of the 36 astronauts developed early stage cataracts, consistent with radiation exposure. The film was not 'fogged' by radiation because they were stored in metal canisters immediately after shot, preventing radiation fogging. Also film shot from unmanned probes did not receive radiation fogging which you insist is proof it was faked.
rich1051414 1 month ago
@rich1051414 I like to know what your smoking.When you go to the dentist for an x-ray they put a lead shield 2 inches thick to protect you.And your telling me those little metal containers will protect the film from the enormous amount of radiation in space? We can go back and forth all day and your going to believe what you want. Maybe they should put that to the test put some film in some thin layer of metal and expose that to extreme level of radiation and see what happens, lol.
gxsrbaby 1 month ago
@gxsrbaby then give me one logical conclusion why radiation fogging did not occur on the Lunar Orbiter and Luna 3? those were unmanned, used the same film and development techniques, and did not receive radiation fogging. I would love for them to test it, but as far as my place on it, i am not even convinced this is even a legitimate argument
rich1051414 1 month ago
@rich1051414 between the earth and the moon it's called the van allen radiation belt look it up. They say the radiation is over 900 rem, which is more than enough to kill anybody. NASA said they survived the radiation, because they moved fast through it. But that's like saying if you run in rain you won't get as wet. Through the belt the film and the astronaunts were exposed to this radiation for 4 hours. Look it up.
gxsrbaby 1 month ago
@rich1051414 And if your thinking the Apollo capsule will protect them the answere is no.They made it as thin and light as possible. NASA made no attempt to protect the astronauts and their equipment of any levels of radiation.
gxsrbaby 1 month ago
@gxsrbaby the major radiation threat was caused by solar flares, and they intentionally chose a time when the threat of the solar flares was the lowest. Your argument is invalid that NASA mode no attempt to protect astronauts when a single google search will return tons of papers made public of the measures they took to protect the astronauts from radiation, including a built in dosimeter to measure accumulative skin dose.
rich1051414 1 month ago
@rich1051414 and every eleven years it appears to repeat. So every eleven years there's a peak of sun spot activity.This is associated with a peak of solor radiation. One of the peaks was in 1969 and 1970 right when the appollo missions was supposed to flown through them. They could not have picked a worst time to send a man to the moon.
gxsrbaby 4 weeks ago
@gxsrbaby No one is arguing it was a solar maximum, but it was forecasted to be calm, and 7 solar flares were recorded. They actually have to hit the spacecraft, not just dump charged particles into the solar wind to muck with radio reflection in the ionosphere (which is one way flares make life miserable down here).
rich1051414 4 weeks ago
@rich1051414 You do understand there are other sources of radiation other than solar flares, and within the belt there are always a constant level of radiation. I know NASA has an excuse and answere for everything, but with as many people believing we did not land on the moon you would think somebody somewhere would put things like this to the test. But no we get people like Mythbusters trying to explain shadows.
gxsrbaby 4 weeks ago
@rich1051414 Just for the sake of argument, let's just pretend the astronauts survived through the heavy radiation, and a miracle happened. There is so much evidence that we didn't land on the moon, that I cannot fit on here. Try to explain why the film did not get damaged between the radiation and the tempature. It was 250 degrees on the moon and film melts at a 150. They must of had one hell of an air conditioner up there.
gxsrbaby 4 weeks ago
@gxsrbaby poop
raydredX 4 weeks ago
@gxsrbaby 2 things. 1: Are you a physicist, engineer, astronaut, or a sort of interplanetary expert? Any degrees saying you're a well versed expert? You just gonna read what you see on the internet and believe it instantly? 2: Why in the hell does it matter?
MetalGearRexPilot 1 week ago
@MetalGearRexPilot People are always trying to make video's explaining why the shadows are going different ways, and why there are no stars in the sky, etc. But nobody is trying to explain the real evidence, and the reason why that is they simply can't. We don't have the technology to send a man to the moon today let alone 40 years ago. You don't need to be a scientist to know the radiation in space. I hope one day we do go to the moon. But we don't have the technology yet.
gxsrbaby 1 week ago
@MetalGearRexPilot And by the way they say at the end of this video "Until someone can find video of the flag moving without it being manipulated by astronauts, it's busted". Mythbusters obviously didn't do their research well enough. Because there is video of the flag waving a little without the astronauts touching it. But obviously they are not going to put that on t.v.
gxsrbaby 1 week ago
@gxsrbaby But this is not the same thing as saying the generalized radiation environment was deadly. The generalized radiation environment is survivable. So are the VAB, for at least short periods. Energetic solar events are in the same class as meteoroids; if one strikes you, it is bad news, but you have to work the ACTUAL probabilities of one striking you, which is quite low.
rich1051414 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rich1051414 Why don't Mythbusters get some film like the astronauts used, and expose it to very low radiation and see how the pictures turn out. But no they are just going to explain sand and shadows. I am not one to believe in conspiracey theories, but there is just way too much evidence suggesting that we did not land on the moon
gxsrbaby 1 month ago
@gxsrbaby Why don't Mythbusters get some film like the astronauts used, and expose it to very low radiation and see how the pictures turn out. But no they are just going to explain sand and shadows. I am not one to believe in conspiracey theories, but there is just way too much evidence suggesting that we did not land on the moon.
gxsrbaby 1 month ago
@gxsrbaby As i said in my earlier post, Lunar Orbiter and Luna 3 both did not recieve radiation fogging which also used on board development processes.
rich1051414 1 month ago
if the hoax morons think it was filmed in a studio
why would it blow in the wind?????
i'll tell you why it moves....because of momentum
how much more does this explaination need to be dumbed down
im surprised hoaxers even manage to use the internet
markandrach 2 months ago
I lhink that this experience is nowhere close to explain the movement of the flag. the flag was shaking and moving from side to completly the other side even when no one is shaking it . so that one remain unexplained for me
julecezar213 2 months ago
Ok, see this video you understand my point of view: bDnWwFR2ZuI
See the player jump in the sand very like the astronauts, see this happen on earth not in the moon. In the movies you see very like these video. Imagine in the moon there are no water droplets, no humidity. How it works like on earth. The stones are not humid to glue to the astronauts feet. If you know science you know these is not possible on the moon! There are sand glued to the camera the astronaut is hanging, this is impossible
animidia 2 months ago
Nasa used controlled rovers, because they have technology to do it, if they controlled the apollo they will doit no problem. There are the test with the lander that was not sucessfull and the pilot had to eject himself from the lander. This test show how difficult to maneuver the lander! I believe you are pissoff because there are a lot of mistakes. I will see this is true one day. Like we see FBI show we are right about the Roswell cover up.
animidia 2 months ago
Comment removed
animidia 2 months ago
I live in a country that we learned all fucking governments do illusions to you believe in you country, no matters it is a big or small country all are full of liars. Maybe in a future you really learn they do this for you behave like you do. The Mythbusters showed to me that moonlanding is a fake. I really know science, dont say to me i donot know is just about cover up. I believe men moonlanding and not the case of Neil Amstrong! If more prove come up i change my opinion, but now i prefer wait
animidia 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MYTHBUSTER PROPAGANDA JEW QUEER PIGS
JFK THE FATHER OF THE MOON HOAX
/watch?v=pCp2jTtay0w&feature=related
Apollo 11 40th anniversary
DeadJesus100 2 months ago
it posable on the moon thing move slowly so one hard push it will mosve slow like it waving
Hi675445 2 months ago in playlist More videos from Dolfan0925
@Hi675445 What?
TheSeldomSeenDude 2 months ago
See before shoot me! You must know NASA did not a fligt test for the astronauts. Moonlanding was very risk to the astronauts they used rover and small controlled robots to put the laser reflector. Why they never go back to the moon? They havent any proofs to show people they really landed on the moon! Films an pictures is possible to do fakes. Se the films above and believe moonlanding was a hoax. Maybe NASA has some good proof than pictures or movies. I believe in science, but not in NASA,FBI.
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia
If NASA used "small controlled robots" then I'll expect you to prove it. What robots? Robots made with blueprints you dont have? Built by engineers you dont know? Launched on a date you cant name in a rocket no one saw? THOSE robots? You cant just make up a story as you go.
You know of 'No proofs?" Then you're ignorant. We have moonrocks, we have the Japan LRO pics just to name two.
Disbelieving NASA is only primitive paranoia.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Is easy to prove, Mars Spirit and Opportunity robots. NASA did it I can prove to you showing a video camera that shot the landers leaving moon, you can see it was made by a camera on the moon see this video and you never say is old primitive paranoia.
rKDZmLJZVcg
The problem with people like you is that you think everybody is stupid! I have more proofs if you want i show.
Stop thinkig we are stupid. NASA always was liars, about UFOS about cover ups, you know is true.
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 Errr, spirit and opportunity are made with 90's tech, and cant pick up anything heavy, let alone pick up and place one perfectly. The mars rovers cant even blast off with mars rocks NOW, let alone 40 years ago. THATS the extent of your education? "Well they're both robots therefore they're the same in every way?" WTF kind of newb argument is that?
See, the problem is YOU ARE stupid. ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse You are stupid and blind, did you see this film? rKDZmLJZVcg
Moon rovers are big than Mars rovers! Give me the proof NASA did not used rovers. My education is good i know very well about science, moon, earth. I can give more proofs if you want that NASA used rovers in the time the man fake moonlanding, is every where, mistakes. I allready showed a sample movie with a robot camera panning the moon, if you stupid and blind is not my problem!
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 You say you have proof? OK, I want some schematics and documents on the alleged moon rovers NASA built. I want interviews with the engineers who built the things.
I looked up your link, we know the lunar rover camera could be remote controlled from Earth. Hell, we know at that time the USSR had the Lunokhod rovers then.
That isn't evidence NASA had a rover like Lunokhod or Spirit MER on the moon.
Also, look up logic, you can't prove a negative. The burden of proof is yours
loperspest 2 months ago
@loperspest Ha you have got it. NASA had it. Remember that NASA never will put a astronaut in the moon if the space program did not have tested. NASA hinded these tests and use maneuvered landers. If you see the moonlander rover the astronaut is like a stiff puppet. Anouther thing very important: where they placed the rover in the lander? NASA had tv on that time, camera controled by hand, they have small tv cameras. Why NASA never showed the moon test to the public? Because they used for real !
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia
The astronauts will look stiff, they're in spacesuits.
But you can see the astronaut inside, not a puppet.
/watch?v=H4rD43nexhA&
Here is video of them unloading the lunar rover /watch?v=-ShauSWcTC4
So the US used Nazi scientists and engineering? So? That's spoils of war.
"showed moon test to the public? Because they used for real"
Please rephrase this. What are you trying to say.
And while you're at it , provide some diagrams and photos for this alleged NASA robotic moon rover.
loperspest 2 months ago
@loperspest Stolen from Nazi, maybe they change a bit, but stolen. They dont need to fake because they used from test site on are 51!! A lot of films prove they did there. You can see how many things the astronaut put on the surface of the moon, how they packed every objects, the rovers, the antenas, the astronauts, the retroprojectors, some other things, apollo must be huge to put all the stuff
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia
You say Apollo was filmed at Area 51 at Groom Lake But if you look at the area, it's nothing like the moon, been the wrong colour and covered in scrub.
tinyurl*com/gro0mlk
US and Nazii engineers worked together, it was a Juno rocket that launched Explorer, but how does this prove an Apollo hoax?
They stored a lot of equipment in Quads folded up and packed tight.
tinyurl*com/6ocvky2
You keep insisting NASA had robotic rovers, but have not shown any evidence they did, where's the photos?
loperspest 2 months ago
@loperspest I all ready showed movies to you, the problem with you is that you think i am stupid. There are a lot of evidences they used robotic rovers. Why me have to show the proofs? Did ever go to the cinema watch some films? Area 51, the fucking place you want fake you do on earth in your garden. Do you want i admit that Neil amstrong put his fucking feet on the moon?Fuck off! Maybe others put the feet there not Neil amstrong! They did that for win the war against russians!
animidia 2 months ago
@loperspest You need to see the movies about robotic cameras in the moon. I allready put my ideas on the comments, if want to dicuss go to Neil Amstrong and ask him! Hi is alive this proves that he never went to the moon! if so he allready dead! If you does not know space is dangerous for human body. Because there are to much radiation from the sun. If he went there he was dead right now!
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia
A remote control camera, yes.
It's not design papers, it's not photos of its construction, it's no evidence at all of a robotic rover run by NASA, all it proves is the camera on the moon buggy could be remote controlled.
I knew this already.
You're wrong about radiation.
The Soviets sent probes to see if a manned mission was survivable.
Their findings?
"Seven-day flights along the trajectories of Zond-5 and 7 probes are safe from the radiation point of view."
tinyurl*com/z57pdf
loperspest 2 months ago
@loperspest John Lenard Walson Doyou know this guy he does movies from the moon from down earth. If he does these movies if good quality why NASA with large telescopes does not do from the moonlanding sites. Because it is fake! They have tecnology to do nice movies from good telescopes they have. Why they don do do eny pictures from earth, if this guy do why Nasa didnt?
You are wrong! you are losing you brain, saying radiation does not affect the astronauts! even us here on earth are!
animidia 2 months ago
@loperspest A remoto control is the same for a moving robot probe! Dont lose your mind. Radiation depends on the Sun winds. Could be dangerous or not, but as far i know, space is really a dangerous place, you know a lot o astronauts from olds missions to space are deads now by cancer: Why Neil Amstrong did not died? He is 80's now probably he goes forever! *___* What about Buzz Aldrin he is 81, probably he is not affected by radiation too! Liars how you believe in this, is a fucking fake!
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia
.Radiation levels are indeed higher in space than most places on Earth, but they only went up for a short period of time. A relatively short exposure means a smaller dose and a much less likely chance of health issues later in life.
Many old people get cancer, it's not surprising at least a few astronauts did.
And no, a remote controlled camera is not a robotic rover. It is only proof of itself.
I can show the LM, CSM, and Saturn V under construction, got any for your robotic rover?
loperspest 2 months ago
@animidia Because the Solar wind isnt constant, dumbass. The sun ebbs and flows like everything else. Plus, its obvious you just cut and pasted "radiation" with zero education. Radiation comes in all shapes and sizes. Alpha beta gamma to name only 3. Different kinds, different strengths, different dangers. The solar wind is alpha and beta radiation. BOTH kinds are blocked by plastic. Only Gamma needs lead.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
There are the regoliths problema whem the astronauts jumps, the regoliths and dust jump it them, supposing they are in the moon: no water droplets and no air! Why the regoliths go up as they jump. Since no water on sand. If you see on the beach if you jump the sand jumps with you feet very like in the jump of the astronauts, this show the sand on the moon is mixed with water! If you know science there are not water on the moon, how thee regoliths is glued to astronaut feet.
animidia 2 months ago
@loperspest Do you believe everything NASA say? They did in the past: they stolen german rocket program from the NAZIs, they had allready spy on Russians rocket program, the same russian spy on americans. NASA has alien technology, you can see some proofs over Google Earth in area 51, not engines, but signs they did on the ground!FBI released the Roswell documents that they have alien technology. All liars! What planet you are? We are in a planet governed by illuminatis that use ilusinism.
animidia 2 months ago
@loperspest Ilusionism is like the Mythbusters do, every thing they say you believe, because they say is true. I believe NASA went to the moon, i am not saying this, i am saying the first moonlanding did not existed, because they have'nt time to do that. They put astronauts on space without training. It was a suicide mission!You know that are a lot of problems to do that, no chance the astronauts coming back. Anouther idea: where is the tests from the astronauts filmed by NASA?
animidia 2 months ago
@loperspest Where is the original films from the first mission. NASA said they lost al the movies, they erased by mistake. HAHAHA, how stupid this is. Erased, lost, anything is a fucking lie, because it is very compromising the films. I know there are a lot of mistakes on the films, because they blured parts of the films. Now they want no fly zones over the sites on the moon. Why? just to know someday the lie will finish. You believe in Santa claus?
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia Hey i am not trying to prove anything, dont say my education is bad, is not about education, is about cover up! There is alot of mistakes on the moonlanding, is not the shadows and not the flags. Is about cover up, americans government is filled if liars. They fake to you believe. I am not saying all the space program is fake, probably you think that, i know there is a good space program, but the first moonlanding was a fake to me!! No matters you ofends my inteligence or my integrity
animidia 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 There's NOTHING you can show me which hasnt already been seen, ridiculed and laughed at LONG before you came here begging for attention ;) Nothing you've posted proves any "hoax" in the slightest. IF the rovers were too big to go on the LEM then we should have heard that 40 YEARS AGO by actual engineers who work for a living, not hoax newbs 4 decades too late. NASA published the blueprints for god sake.
Your "education" at Mcds is a piss poor substitute for real experience ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 Moon rovers picked up moonrocks? "Picked up" which our rovers cant even do today? Its about robot control dumbass, not size. 1969 didnt have the robot tech for ANY delicate work. Quote me ANY robot in 69 that could do what you say they could.
Plus, What rovers? Rovers built with blueprints you dont have?
By engineers you cant name?
Built in a factory no one saw?
THOSE rovers? LOL Thank god you can just make up your story as you go. Else you'd look stupid ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse See the movie STUPID
rKDZmLJZVcg
You dont know how to do it? Copy and paste this letters in the Youtube browser and the movie will pop up!
HAHAHAHHA! I think if you see it will never call me stupid anymore *__* !
rogodoy12 2 months ago
Aj3z9-dcMxU
vghVABLT6es
just see these videos! They are very good, showing how easy to do fakes. I can show some photos about NASA machines for make astronauts walking on the moon, See the Walt Disney film: 20000 Leagues under the Sea (1954) to see how they have all technology to do the fake they filmed under the water and make pictures in the studio. The films atmosfere is equal inside water tank and the photos was made using a photograph studio, becaus no need zero gravity machines.
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia There's nothing in the apollo footage that looks anything like underwater footage. You havent named a single professional movie-maker who says "that looks like underwater footage." Again, you're just making up a story as you go.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
This flag test is really stupid because you can see it moving like crazy, there are one filme the displacemente of air whem the astronaut pass beside the flag it start to move is very convincing that the flag is flaping. I find this video of Mythbusters too americans dream! I believe will laught a lot when all this lie about moon landing will finish, in the same way i am very happy with FBI cocuments about Roswell case is finish. I think is better assume the error than try explain it!
animidia 2 months ago
Somebody blocked my comments! Is really funny that the cover up about UFO is supported by the people, in the same way they use this Mysthbusters to do what they want that is hind the real true about NASA cover up. I know they went to space and just maybe they did the moonlanding, but if see there are a lot of mistakes, not one but a lot. Musthbuster just prooved is possible do it here on earth. Why NASA did not moonlanded in these years, because is to risk, to dangerous!
animidia 2 months ago
Ok, now I all ready sent a letter to Mythbusters to create a enviroment to shoot some pictures with the camera the astronaut used with a photograph film in the moon they never asnwered my letters. What about that? Int the enviroment with hot and cold the film never survive!
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 You do realize that, from a thermal control perspective, low earth orbit is pretty much the same, right? Are you claiming those photos are fake also?
There is several reasons the film survived.
1: They went in the lunar morning, the moon is cooler in the lunar morning.
2: The cameras and film magazines were silvered, to reflect away heat radiation.
3: In a vacuum the only means of transferring heat is by heat radiation.
This is why a Thermos is so good at keeping things hot or cold.
loperspest 2 months ago
Comment removed
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 This is a comments removed by Fidel Castro friends
animidia 2 months ago
@loperspest In vaccum there are no mild temperature, just in the shadows. To use the camera they have to be at mild temperature, this is not possible in a vacuum, or is hot or is cold. The problem with this is that they never wil prove for me because i know it was a fake. There are a lot of mistake like this every where. This camera mistake is the problem, because in another film they put a cover on the camera, why they did that because nobody can prove. Is like you lie about youself, who nows?
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12
Low Earth orbit is also a vacuum. So you are claiming every photograph taken in earth orbit on EVA is fake, from every nation that has done so? That is a big hoax. Why would all these people lie to support an alleged hoax that only benefits the USA?
And you are wrong, lunar morning is cooler because the sun angle is different.
lunarpedia*org/index*php?title=Lunar_Temperature&oldid=10033
This is based on basic science. You have much to learn.
loperspest 2 months ago
@loperspest i learned and i know is fake with you believe i s you problem i know science, morning in a vacuum is hot! if is at shadow it will a litle bit cooler, you have much to learn, you must know hot is hot in vacuum and in that morning the sun was very high.
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12
Even if that were so, the sun angle makes a huge difference as shown in the link with the Stefan–Boltzmann law, why do you think a Thermos, also known as a vacuum flask or a Dewar flask, keeps things inside the same temperature?
There is a layer of vacuum and inside is silvered. The cameras and the film cases were silvered and the moon is a vacuum, making the moon one big Thermos as far as temperature change is concerned, so all that heat wouldn't have affected the film much.
loperspest 2 months ago
@loperspest I am sorry will keep trying convence me but i will wait for any more experience that trully show real that the vacuum is hot or cold every where since the absence of air and wind. That was the mistake they did because that time nobody will argue about that. NASA uses illusionism for fake things, in the same way they cover up ufo images. I believe man went to the moon, but this possibility is real, because the conspiracy theorists were right about Roswell case, FBI fully documented!
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 If this was true, a Thermos wouldn't work. A Thermos does work, so you're wrong. What part of this are you not getting? If a Thermos can keep your drink cold, despite warm surroundings, then Apollo astronauts could keep their film cool. If it is reflected away, where is the heat going to come from in a vacuum?
Not to mention Earth Orbit is also a vacuum. Film is not the only thing that doesn't react well to very low or high temperatures, what of Earth orbit astronauts & cosmonauts?
loperspest 2 months ago
@loperspest I am not discussing about astronaut vessels, just about the camera and the film. I know you undestand very well, but if you really know about you are saying you know that NASA said that small sand regolits was found in the loans of the astronauts. This was public notified. How can regolits go inside the loans of the astronauts? Because this is a lie! Try to find about this and you probably not know about this little problem!
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 The what? The loans? That isn't a body part, that is monetary transaction. What are you talking about? If you are going to use the language to communicate, learn to use English better. I am Canadian, rogodoy12, so going off about the USA really has no business in this discussion.
Why does it matter if we are talking astronauts or film? Both are sealed containers in a vacuum that had to keep the contents at a reasonable temperature. If NASA can keep astronauts cool, why not film?
loperspest 2 months ago
@loperspest Ok i have trying discuss if you, if you are candian try learn a good english yourself, maybe loose some school teaching about education. I am off, please do not comnent anymore. PLEASE I AM OFF, NO COMMENTS! DID YOU UNDERSTAND. I AM NOT ENGLISH AMERICAN OR CANADIAN I AM NOT DUMB!! I AM NOT STUPID I LEARNED ENGLISH, I SPEAK LESS THAN YOU BUT I AM PROUD NO TO BE DUMB LIKE YOU!
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia
Goodbye, and take care.
I am sorry this could not be a more fulfilling discussion.
Live long and Prosper,
Loperspest.
loperspest 2 months ago
probably you never know what i am triyng to say because some people are removing my comments. Ibelieve there are no difference in Cuba than USA! Because in Cuba they do censorship to the citizans the same they do in USA, no difference. You never understand new ideas. You believe in everything. If they say is true you believe this is brainwashing!! I am pity of americans, it is not about science or physics is about cover up. Bye
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@rogodoy12 And you believe every retarded dork hoax webpage you've ever read. So you're not brainwashed WHY exactly? ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse No, every one. If you try to discuss i showed to you that there are a lot of mistakes on the moonlanding hoax. The problem is that NASA brainwashed people about the moonlanding hoax, no matter i say makes no difference. Is simple understand:Why NASA wont go there and show it is true? This is the main point. I know you probably will say they have no interests on the moon! Conspiracy theorists were right about FBI cover up, all the documents are in FBI web page.
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia "brainwashing" Inventing ANOTHER conspiracy as proof of your first conspiracy only proves how desperately stupid your evidence is for both. Again, you cant make up your story as you go.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse A believe not all conspiracy theorists are right, because lack some knowledge of science. But if you investigate seriously you will find a lot of mistakes in the pictures and in the movies. Is not about film effects, this is prooved by Mythbusters that it is possible do the effects, see the movie Mythbusters about men walking on the moon they did here on earth for real! See that this prove NASA hoax. I can show you a lot of mistakes if you want. I will leave for the future.
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia If there are any flaws, I've never seen them pointed out by anyone who knew what they were talking about. What i have seen are rank amateurs making idiots of themselves with "This pic is wrong cause...blah blah" being ignorant of something in 8th grade science.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@loperspest I dont want be discussing this with dumb ass like you believe or not americans allways do fakes
rogodoy12 2 months ago
@loperspest I am just velieve moonlanding is a hoax, just that, i did not say every picture is a hoax, you are putting words on my mouth. I dont know if others moonlanding was fake, but the first with Neil amstrong, was a fake. Any way we can't prove that, because NASA uses all kind of fakes to prove conspiracy theorists are wrong, is a battle with the liars against who wants the real truth. You can believe in anything don try to make me believe that, you have no knowledge to convince me!Sorry.
animidia 2 months ago
@animidia Sorry, but that sounds ridiculous.
You admit you have no proof or evidence, but then invent this new story to try and justify it.
What motive would they have to fake only Apollo 11?
Apollo 12 also fulfilled Kennedy' promise.
Why would they need to fake it?
Apollo 7 and 8 tested the CSM in Earth and lunar orbit, Apollo 9 and 10 did likewise with the LM, 10 descending from orbit but not landing.
So with no motive and no practical reason and no evidence, forgive me if I have my doubts.
loperspest 2 months ago
@animidia "NASA uses all kinds of fakes" Then we'll expect you to prove that, not just throw around unproven conspiracies as proof of other conspiracies.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
Comment removed
ManFromMelbourne 2 months ago
These guys are just humoring the conspracy dorks. They knew, as anyone with basic physics knowledge would know, what the outcome would be. Every pathetic argument that the conspracy dorks come up with are easily debunked by intelligent people. What a waste of time and energy and an insult to the brilliant and brave souls that took us to the moon and back.
billwright331 2 months ago
There isn't any resistance in space of course it’s going to wave around until it lose momentum conspiracy theorists trip me out sometime. They believe were being visited by aliens but don’t think we visited the moon talking about oxy morons
will4wil 3 months ago
how can they prove apollo 15 hoax which flag moves as the astronaut passes by the flag???
PERSIAisHISTORY 3 months ago
busted crazies...
Paperism1ne 3 months ago
obviously the mythbuster crew are on one side only, to really prove all this we need to go to the moon and do the test o verthere to be 100% sure, what's next they gonna make busted 9/11?
agapitomelorquez1 3 months ago
93 people don't understand how momentum in a vacuum works.
deltaray3 3 months ago 18
THIS IS A TOTAL LACK OF UNDERSTANDING -_-!!! The flag looks like its waving because it is being held by steel wires to make it look this way... omg
ejnarm3 4 months ago
Ok, here's a question to all the conspiracy theroists out there: If NASA faked the landing on the moon, how did they manage to keep quiet everyone that was involved in faking it? We are not talking about keeping two or three people quiet but we are talking about over 100.000 people. How come NONE of them ever said: "Ok guys, we totally faked the moon landing"?
LordFvckingHorst 4 months ago
Van allen Raidation belts??? If they did exsist, the same suit the Astronaunts wore in 1968 would be able to with stand Chernobyl and the Japan Fukushema disaster, since space Radiation and Nuke Raiation are the same..... What Im saying is since the Van allen belts are real, and no human has ever put on any such suit to venture into such badly radeated sights, then YES THE CONSPIRACY IS TRUE. WENT NEVER WENT TO THE MOON.
jonescool1fly 4 months ago
@jonescool1fly
RADIATION is a big scary word newbs hear on TV and then repeat, pretending to sound smart. And here you are ;)
Radiation is in space? What kind? Alpha Radiation? Gamma? Arent they totally different kinds? Only gamma needs lead? But Alpha can be blocked by plastic? And space is full of ALPHA? You mean thats not taught in every radiation safety class? Like the classes you've never had, but still mouth off like an idiot about? ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
of course we went to the moon, thats a dumb conspiracy. i hate the word conspiracy bc it instantly makes ppl laugh at alt ideas. i think that 9.11 was an inside job...wtc7... and that JFK was not murdered by lee oswald ( i know oswald was in texas that day, and that he did fire his gun, i just dont think it was the fatal shot that blew jfks head onto his trunk)
yimnerr 4 months ago
I mean come on, would they really have the air condition running if they shot it in a studio? :P
Seriously, though. Conspiracy theorists are annoying. They never challenge their own theories, as if it the theories were some sort of religion.
TTV5 4 months ago
@TTV5 They are annoying, they totally ignore all evidence to prove the moon landing and churn out the same debunked hoax theories parrot fashion. Some of them are moslem and hate America, they all share a distrust even paranoia of the American government. I have been told by them that NASA controls You Tube and Wikipedia.
Spindry96 4 months ago
GUIZE THE REAL ISSUE IS DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE.
They are knowingly pumping this chimical in to our drinking supply.
We need to expose this now.
2camjohn 4 months ago 5
Comment removed
swfcocs1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2camjohn you are either a troll or an idiot-dihydrogen monoxide is water-H20! I hope you actually get the joke and don`t actually believe this obvious hoax.
swfcocs1 4 months ago
@2camjohn hahahahahahahaha
did you see that video on Ebaums world?
for thos of you who dont know break apart the word DiHydrogen Monoxide it doesnt take a scientist to figure it out
M40A3 4 months ago