@KrONiiKxDevelopments : I suppose so. I wasn't watching back then. Started in late 2003- early 2004. However, I did enjoy watching this PPV when I got it in the anthology. The WWF blurs however suck.
@Notebookwriter1 Yeah, I started watching it around 2001-2002 but it was good until around 2006-2007. Idk why, though. Everything seemed to have gotten "safer". There's less weapons used, less extreme moves pulled e.g. Comparing the ladder match between Jeff Hardy and RVD in this to a ladder match that has happened recently, the one on this is WAY more exciting and more entertaining. \:
@KrONiiKxDevelopments : True, but there's a reason why the WWE has gotten more safer. First, the blood use not being in WWE anymore is a direct result of disease prevention, and plus, so many guys have hacked their heads up with blood loss, and blading. High risk ladder matches still happen from time to time, but yes. RVD, and Jeff's match is really good. Overall, WWE's "safe" environment is good for their workers. Gotta think about them to. Besides, this makes the high risk moments in WWE...
@KrONiiKxDevelopments : whenever they happen, more exciting. TNA on the other hand over does extreme stuff, and it ends up not being exciting as it should be. Less is more works great for WWE, and their PPVs, with the exception of WrestleMania have been generally good. I agree though. WWE just isn't as good as it was back then. Eventhough I wasn't watching back then, I still knew who Triple H, The Rock, and Stone Cold were thanks to my friends, and my dad turned to RAW and SD a couple times.
@Notebookwriter1 Yeah, I definitely agree and understand that. I just find that the matches I've watched throughout the past few years from time to time have been more c'omedic' rather than actual wrestling. the storyline's have become a bit stupid and some of the wrestler's right now are really cheesy. If you compare the rivalries you saw from back then to the rivalries you see now, the older one's win hands down, to be honest. But these are just my opinions. [:
sooooooo hq
umberassassin 1 month ago
awesome ppv!
MrAmnja 9 months ago 2
Back when WWE/WWF etc. was at it's finest, eh? :P
KrONiiKxDevelopments 9 months ago
@KrONiiKxDevelopments : I suppose so. I wasn't watching back then. Started in late 2003- early 2004. However, I did enjoy watching this PPV when I got it in the anthology. The WWF blurs however suck.
Notebookwriter1 9 months ago
@Notebookwriter1 Yeah, I started watching it around 2001-2002 but it was good until around 2006-2007. Idk why, though. Everything seemed to have gotten "safer". There's less weapons used, less extreme moves pulled e.g. Comparing the ladder match between Jeff Hardy and RVD in this to a ladder match that has happened recently, the one on this is WAY more exciting and more entertaining. \:
KrONiiKxDevelopments 9 months ago
@KrONiiKxDevelopments : True, but there's a reason why the WWE has gotten more safer. First, the blood use not being in WWE anymore is a direct result of disease prevention, and plus, so many guys have hacked their heads up with blood loss, and blading. High risk ladder matches still happen from time to time, but yes. RVD, and Jeff's match is really good. Overall, WWE's "safe" environment is good for their workers. Gotta think about them to. Besides, this makes the high risk moments in WWE...
Notebookwriter1 9 months ago 2
@KrONiiKxDevelopments : whenever they happen, more exciting. TNA on the other hand over does extreme stuff, and it ends up not being exciting as it should be. Less is more works great for WWE, and their PPVs, with the exception of WrestleMania have been generally good. I agree though. WWE just isn't as good as it was back then. Eventhough I wasn't watching back then, I still knew who Triple H, The Rock, and Stone Cold were thanks to my friends, and my dad turned to RAW and SD a couple times.
Notebookwriter1 9 months ago
@Notebookwriter1 Yeah, I definitely agree and understand that. I just find that the matches I've watched throughout the past few years from time to time have been more c'omedic' rather than actual wrestling. the storyline's have become a bit stupid and some of the wrestler's right now are really cheesy. If you compare the rivalries you saw from back then to the rivalries you see now, the older one's win hands down, to be honest. But these are just my opinions. [:
KrONiiKxDevelopments 9 months ago
@KrONiiKxDevelopments : No, I certainly agree with you on that.
Notebookwriter1 9 months ago
@Notebookwriter1 And yes, TNA does over-do it the majority of the time. I've seen some pretty awesome matches on there, though.
KrONiiKxDevelopments 9 months ago