Added: 2 months ago
From: PatriotReview
Views: 27,958
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (184)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Newt strikes again...

  • Yes, he supported Rock in the PRMARY

    Goldwater WON the PRIMARY, Then Gingrich supported GOLDWATER

    I know that Mormons are mindless drones but the rest of you have no excuse

  • Thumbs up if you clicked on this because of Newts hair in the video still!!

  • It's as simple as RECORDS...Look at Romney's opposition to President Reagan, and Romney's vote for Jimmy Carter in the 80's. Look at Romney's record as an independent liberal leaning wannabe politician in the 90's who endorsed the most liberal presidential democratic nominee wannabe, Paul Tsongas, in 1992. Look at Romney's record as a Mass. moderate governor mandating health care, supporting abortions, raising taxes, and consistent flip flops on important American issues we are faced with today.

  • @MrDonrob81 Yeah, if you actually LOOK at his record you'll see that he cut taxes several times, cut spending, and used conservative principles to heal the Mass economy and it was a success. If you LOOK at his record you will see the vetoes and other actions that he took to keep abortions from being easier and more readily available, fighting the 85% liberal lunacy in his legislature. Have you actually LOOKED at his record? It seems you haven't, because you lack context and facts.

  • @rabidfox1 He cut taxes for rich and supported Bush tax cuts. He admitted to being a Regan style republican too but we had HUGE deficits back in the 80's so it's nothing really to brag about. I'd rather vote for a guy who not only voted to cut taxes but never voted to raise them ever. And as a Navy vet my number one requirement is a strict adherence to the constitution. Something every service member and president takes a vow to protect and Newt was never in the military.

  • @psovegeta "cut taxes for the rich"?

    Come on! You can come up with a better argument than that, can't you? You've simply stated something that is false, and a large misconception usually only liberals fall for. I'm talking about how Romney transformed the economy of Mass by cutting taxes (not just for the rich, you moron) and cutting spending. Look at what happened -hint, it was a success. This is the main issue of today's election, and also is in line with the constitution.

  • @rabidfox1 lol Newt's pledge to uphold the constitution is just as solid as his "military" career and commitment to his ex-wives. I don't know if you yourself ever served in the military but I did and I can tell you my fellow vets as well as active duty military think Newt, Romney, Santorum and Obama are a bunch of chicken hawk losers who want to send us war based on assumptions. Time to wake up and support the only constitutional candidate, Dr.Ron Paul.

  • @psovegeta <<<< just a faggot game designer.

    guess you gave up on being successful from the gitgo

  • @2002lees lol I have a website selling adult computer games. Doesn't change what I said was true, your guy is backed by special interest groups as Obama and everyone else so don't expect things to change for the better if Newt gets in. Ron Paul on the other hand promises a 1 trillion dollar cut in the first year, something YOUR guy can't promise.

  • @rabidfox1 has Mitt Romney expressed any support for moving away from the Federal Reserve System? What about the bail outs of crony banking institutions?

  • hey ... not fair, let's hear the rest of the quote!

  • Oh, so he supports Rockefellers? Kill him.

  • He is a serial liar of 30 years standing, very well credentialed, and a very good prospect for becoming the nex president.

  • Quoting Newt Gingrich: "On September 16, 1981, Representatives Stewart McKinney and I introduced legislation designed to end bureaucratic interference in the use of marijuana as a medicant. We believe licensed physicians are competent to employ marijuana, and patients have a right to obtain marijuana legally, under medical supervision, from a regulated source". Source: The Journal of the American Medical Association March 19, 1982;247(11)

  • OK. All of you participating in this attack--and all the Gingrich partisans engaging in similar attacks on Mitt Romney. I guess you all want four more years of Obama. I am completely disgusted. I don't know whether Rick Santorum's the best candidate. But he's the only candidate not participating in the circular firing squad, so I'm voting for him.

  • @Ken1Lutheran How can you call it an attack? All it shows is Newt's own words. The funny thing about Newt is he thinks everyone has completely forgotten about his checkered past and now he can come in and become president by reinventing himself as a "conservative" who attacks the media when they ask a legitimate question about his words and actions for the past 30 years. When Newt attacks Romney he cites false facts. This is Newt's own statement.

  • @slstaker would you rather have four more years of Obama than four years of Newt?

  • @Ken1Lutheran Nobody has to attack Gingrich. He already shot himself in the foot when he cheated on his now ex-wife. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. Gingrich has many more skeletons in his closet.

  • To the Newt Supporter on this page...which part of "I WAS A ROCKEFELLER STATE CHAIRMAN IN THE SOUTH." don't you understand? Rockefeller chairman of the CFR, Bildgerbergers, Federal Reserve Bankrupters. If he supported Goldwater in '64, he supported Rockefeller in '68 against Reagan, so spin it any way you wish, the guy is transparent in this video and he's been skunked.

  • Newt Gingrich didn't know this video was up on Youtube! LOL! Way to go people. Get out the message loud and clear. Who to vote for in 2012.....for this Primary...make it Ron Paul 2012! He's the only guy who cares about us...period! You may think he's extreme, but if you study his policies, and listen to his son Rand Paul, as well as go to Ron Paul 2012, and see how he is going to balance the budget (he's got it down to the wire). Don't believe the Media Liars who are controlled by the CFR.

  • @caroln1858 Ron Paul has said he can't imagine himself in the White House. Who would want to support a candidate for president who doesn't want the office? Go ahead, waste your vote.

  • Comment removed

  • @slstaker no, he has said he doesn't dream about being the president. Unlike most candidates, he is not power hungry.

  • Last night he claimed he was a Goldwater Conservative. How do people fall for this liar? Do they not do their homework?

  • Hey, slimeball, show us the ENTIRE clip, not one in which Newt is cut off in the middle of his sentence. Also show us the entire CONTEXT.

    Just another DISHONEST attempt to smear by another dishonest, sophomoric thinking Paulbot.

    Go Newt!!!

  • @WMalven hey Newtard how does it feel to support a serial liar, cheater and hypocrite?

  • @WMalven Are you saying we should not believe our lying eyes and ears.Gingrich has and continues to support and drive forward the Rockefeller Agenda of Free Trade, GloBAALization,and worldwide economic control through Global Warming propaganda and Carbon Taxes.If you support Newt you support the Rockefeller Globalist Agenda. Why don't you stop being dishonest and admit you want to live under the One World Dictatorship that is promoted in Newt's favorite book the Third Wave.

  • This guy will say anything if it furthers the Newt-agenda.

  • On the other hand, Romney IS our Rockefeller Republican candidate.

  • What was Newt back then 20 years old? Ha Ha. Romney - you can't be putting out videos like these, it's pitiful!

  • I'm disgusted. I don't know who to vote for.

  • Comment removed

  • @disciplerami Ron Paul

  • @disciplerami Well there's this guy called Dr Ron Paul. He supports a strong NATIONAL defense, but no empire-building and entangling alliances around the world. Barry Goldwater Jr is his close friend and has endorsed him multiple times. You should check him out. =)

  • @PatriotReview lol I found this ONLY because Ron Paul mentioned it! Lo and behold.....

  • @psovegeta Where and when did he mention it?

  • @PatriotReview at 0:23 in the video and back in April 11th of 1988 apparently.

  • What's the problem here? Rockefeller ran against Goldwater for the Republican nomination, and lost. Gingrich, like many other Republicans then (and now! Duh.) could support one candidate in the primary contests for the nomination, and then support the candidate in the general election. He might even have come to believe in him. These clips don't make it clear either way. The Newt haters are grasping for 'proof' of his violations of their version of conservative 'dogma' - give it a rest.

  • @Doorkicker I wouldn't overstate it like that. Newt now is asserting that he was always a Goldwater republican. Well, he wasn't. Here he states that he was a state chairman for Rockefeller. I do agree with you about sound bites though.

  • @Lehmann108

    In debate Newt said "I went to a Goldwater organizing session in 1964," which is entirely plausible for a guy who was active in GOP politics regardless of his position prior to the convention. In fact it's a nuanced statement that protects him from just this sort of criticism, unless he's made bolder claims of Goldwater-ism elsewhere. Where does he assert that he was always a Goldwater Republican? I was a worse fool than him in my youth, but we all can change.

  • @Doorkicker If you supported Rockefeller you aren't a conservative.

  • @cacapoopoo2327

    I was 11 years old in November 1964; went through a phase offellow-traveller leftist idiocy that lasted into my mid-20s, during which time I was a voting citizen although not a politician. Got a job, got property, got mugged by reality, and grew up. People views change, and their beliefs evolve. Who is he now? That is the question.

  • @Doorkicker "who is he now?"

    Now he's the same scumbag that profited from the housing collapse, that claims that he's for family values yet cheated on his wife at the same time he was accusing Clinton of doing the same, he's the same filth that thinks another terror attack would be beneficial to "remind us" that we're still under threat, he's the same duplicitous piece of trash that dodged the draft yet would not hesitate one second into sending your son to another useless war $, could go on...

  • Those of you who think that Newt voted for Goldwater in the general election instead of Johnson-- who do you think is actually distorting things here and trying to give the wrong impression?

    This is just the beginning by the way. Obama's billion dollar campaign fund, plus the media actively campaigning for him and covering up any GENUINELY contradictory statements Obama has made, plus even more than the usual amount of voter fraud, guarantees that Obama will win against any candidate.

  • Newt is a politician, he can play both sides of the fence and utter nuanced platitudes. He would make a good Bush IV following the current Bush III

  • Gingrich said he went to a Goldwater meeting. He did not say he supported Goldwater.

  • Go ahead and get after what Gingrich has said in the past....just make sure to also play Obama's words from the past that he has contradictied himself on since he usurped his way into the WH.

  • LISTEN TO THE AUDIO - @0;24 Gingrich says, "...and APPARENTLY which, by the way, I was a Rockefeller State Chairman in the South.." - interruption for laughter.

    The speaker is obviously mocking someone who made a false claim about his actions in the Goldwater Campaign. This is a classic 'My Cousin Vinny' moment - "I shot the clerk!"

    I don't know if the person who edited this is a malicious, libelous Statist hack, or just another idiot, illogical, unteachable Liberal nutjob.

  • @fascistcat I correct myself. I captured the flv and slowed it down, Gingrich does say, "... a period in which I was..."

    I would still like to know how the sentence ended.

  • @dijhili Ron Paul is not an isolationist. He is a non interventionist and believe we should only go to war when congress declares war and then go to the place and win it and then bring the troops back. No nation building. Afghanistan has taken 10 years and there is no sight of victory. Do you also believe that the Vietnam war was a victory?

  • @Lavard14 You Ron PaulRs remind me of this,

    Back to the Future

    Clock Tower Lady: "Save the clock tower! Save the clock tower. Mayor Wilson is sponsoring an initative to replace that clock. Thirty years ago, lightning struck that clock tower, and the clock hasn't run since. We at the Hill Valley Preservation Society think it should be preserved exactly the way it is, as a part of our history and heritage!"

  • @Lavard14 nope

  • this guy is a good talker but has no backbone - he attends the bohemian grove and is a cfr member - of course he supports the rockefellers and rothschilds! in the gop he sells himself as an anti establishment candidate - what a joke!!!

  • @seppstein91

    Newt is the establishment..

  • He did a commercial with pelosi, people. pelosi!

  • He supported Rockefeller in the primary and Goldwater in the general election. One does have to pay one's political debts. He was very young then.

  • It's nearly impossible to find a republican these days who is not an evildoing social-internationalist. It would not surprise me to learn that Newt molests little boys at child sex parties.

  • RUT ROH RAGGY!

  • Newt is a liar. Plain and simple.

  • @tngilmer54 Agreed. He's despicable, and Santorum was also caught trying to lie during the last debate. I've been persuaded that the much-criticized Romney is the most honest of the bunch.

  • This slimy salamandar newt will say anything to be elected. In last night's debate he implied that he supported Goldwater. He also implied that he was with Reagan. I'll bet he had nothing to do with Reagan in his early years.

  • Seriously America! Wake up and see through Newt's "words"! He is a pro at speaking and I too am impresses with what he says, but we need a leader not a good speaker! After the campaign ends we will need a leader and like it or not mr Romney is a proven executive leader. Anericans beed to stop being ADHD about candidates. Hey look! Shiny object run over here! Hey look another shiny object run over there! Every time a "new" headline pops up everyone runs to follow the new shiny object. ENOUGH

  • iPad auto-correct to sanatorium for the win.

  • It's interesting to read the comments here, with everyone arguing over whether Romney or Newt is the biggest untrustworthy flip-flopper. Everyone is admitting that their candidate is to shady a degree, but that he's better than the other. Good thing there's still a man in this race who doesn't have any of that pesky history of being a douchebag. On a side note, can you imagine a president Gingrich or sanatorium? It would be the first president that wouldn't be given the nuke codes out of pure

  • Ha ha ha.... do you actually think it makes a difference what party the President is from, in a government of the politicians, by the lobbyists, for the corporations. Get a clue folks - democracy is dead, we now live in an increasingly militarized corporatocracy, also known as fascism!

  • My vote will not go to a man who is a closet democrat and comes from a state that sends boot leggers to congress, nor will my vote go to the man from Georgia who voted for NAFTA and a globalist.

    MESSAGE TO THE GOP- if this is the BEST you retards can possibly pick as possible candidates to represent the United States of America, we might as well party like it's 1789 and storm the Bastille.

  • @Christobanistan wtf? are you that scared of a google search? its not my job to educate you sir.

  • Newt implied he supported Goldwater in the debate last night when he was actually State Campaign Director for Rockefeller at the time, which begs the question, what was a Rockefeller campaign director doing at a Goldwater organizing committee in the first place. ht Drudge

  • You understand it's possible to support two opposing GOP candidates in the same election cycle, right?

    Or are you suggesting that after Goldwater got the nomination, Gingrich should have continued to support the losing candidate, Rockefeller?

  • Go here for tonight's video; where he name-drops Barry Goldwater.

    v=NKRVBtChmgg

  • What a fraud this Newt guy is. Just like Romney and Obama.

  • Newt is scum. Rockefeller is scum. Vote Ron Paul.

  • Abrupt ending just as Newt seems to make the statement he is/was a Rockefeller Republican makes me doubt this video.

    The uploader should've included Newt's full statement instead of cutting out the ending. You can change the meaning of many if not most statement's in the English language by cutting out the ending of a statement.

  • I guess it's fair to say that Newt lied.

  • Thanks for sharing about this global elitist green nwo traitor

  • Warning! Lemming Crossing! This 28 second, 24 year old clip proves nothing without the context.

  • This piece of shit Gingrich, along with Santorum, are simply in the race to keep the conservative vote divided. Imagine the swinger Gingrich and the Penn State Pedophile Ring connected Santorum being used as leverage of the Conservative vote. Just goes to show you that much of the Conservative base are as dumb as the Obama zombies on the liberal base

  • Where's the other half of his sentence?

  • Not only is Newtie a Serial Womanizer, he is also a Serial Liar! What a jerk!

    Go Mitt!

  • i WILL VOTE FOR ANYONE ....AND I MEAN ANYONE ...OVER OBAMA!

  • Newt was southern regional chair for Rockefeller in the '68 primaries, when Goldwater wasn't even running. This is fabricated Drudge BS.

  • Oh please. He supported Goldwater after he won the nomination. Like every other Republican. He was young and probably was attracted to Rockefeller's moderate liberalism.

    I supported Gingrich for the nomination in 2008 but ended up voting for McCain. Same damm thing.

  • How anybody who considers him/herself conservative can vote for Newt Gingrich is beyond me. There is nothing conservative about his record, and he seems to like to expand the power of the federal government beyond its constitutionally authorized limits. He has supported NAFTA and GATT, treaties which infringe upon America's sovereignty, as well as gun control legislation. He currently supports the USA Patriot Act, which violates the 4th Amendment. Ron Paul is the only true constitutionalist.

  • Newt got caught in a lie tonite ....one way or the other. In debate tonite he said he supported Goldwater....Here he says Rockerfeller. Anyway I tally it he comes up a Phoney! Who you supported is not something one forgets, unless he is making it up as he goes!

  • Why does the clip end so suddenly? He says "apparently" before the comment. That usually denotes sarcasm, but we can't know because the clip ends before we can have the word "apparently" quantified for us. I'm not trusting this clip in any possible way in this condition until I can see the FULL context.

  • He is just not a nice human being. Every R who served with him from 1994 thinks so. No one likes this guy. How can his candidacy, and potential presidency, be good for the Republican brand if he is so naturally unlikable.

  • Honest question for a Gingrich supporter. Okay, so I am probably what you would call a McCain Republican. I liked the Bush presidents aside from the spending. I'm okay with Romney politically, although I find him without conviction and uninspiring. I accept that Gingrich is intelligent, and the better candidate in a vacuum so to speak. My question is however, how do you, as a Gingrich supporter, reconcile the fact that Gingrich is "a bad person." I mean this without hyperbole or disrespect.

  • @markhamiowa I don't have to reconcile it. He's simply not a bad person. He may have done a few bad things in his life, but who hasn't?

    Nice guys finish last. I'm not electing Newt to be pastor of my church. I want someone to kick some --- in Washington.

  • @DougalPE Doesn't that raise some red flags. Romney is taking heat for a lack of conviction on social conservative issues, while any argument Gingrich could ever advance about social issues is undermined by affairs and divorcing two wives when both were ill. No one who works with him likes him. He is virtually unelectable, but lets say he is elected. What good is kicking ass for four years if it leads to 16 years of democratic rule? Whether his reign is good or not, he will be hated and cast out

  • @DougalPE I'm just saying that It's the most important job in the world. America elects people they like. Because Character matters.

  • @markhamiowa So a plastic, serial flip flopper who showed zero conservative principles as governor has character how?

  • @Christobanistan He has zero personality, but yeah actually. He seems like he has a lot of character. His flip flopping is political posturing. It's called being a smart candidate. which newt put on display when he ran away from his opposition to Paul Ryan's plan. Romney can advocate for social issues, because he didnt run around on his wife. He advocate for changing the culture in washington, because he didnt get reprimanded by Congress for ethics violations. Yeah, he has A LOT more character.

  • @markhamiowa You're not describing a man of character. A man of character doesn't flip flop on every single issue. He tells you what he believes, straight.

  • @Christobanistan so was the straight answer from newt that Paul Ryan's plan was social engineering? or that it show a lot of promise? Was his support for the Mass. health law in 2006 straight, or his his current answer? Or is his takeback on climate change the straight answer? Romney’s flips are nuanced, where he implausible stretches to reconcile two, three, or more positions. btw..a man of principal sticks to his guns. A man of character doesn't run around on his wife.

  • @markhamiowa Yeah Romney's flips flops are really nuanced especially his flip flop from Pro-Choice to Pro-Life!

  • @ryanthemadhatter That's not a flip flop of historical fact. It's not like Romney said he was never pro-choice. Gingrich on the other hand just straight up lied.

  • @thediesel387 LOL...so if you own up to flip-flopping you're not flip-flopping? A swing and a miss!

    Here you can watch for yourself Romney bragging about how Pro-Choice he is!! youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG­4

  • @ryanthemadhatter No, it means you either legitimately changed your position. Or you changed it for political reasons. What he didn't do is pretend like all the stuff he says wraps into some giant theory of the universe, just to escape his statements that don't jive.

  • @markhamiowa No matter how you paint it when a politician switches his positions on a political issue as a politician its known as a flip-flop! Hence Romney is a flip-flopper!

    Here's a video of flip-flopper Romney in action with more of his flip-flops! youtube.com/watch?v=qyp2QIGejq­4

  • @ryanthemadhatter Yes. Yes he is. And so is gingrich. and reagan. and bush. and obama. and clinton. and huckabee. and palin. and mccain. and pretty much every politician ever. Also, pretty much every human being ever. lol. That was my only point.

  • @markhamiowa FINALLY!! I'm glad you admitted it!! That was how this whole thing began!! I said Romney was a flip-flopper and the dude said he wasn't then you jumped in.

    You're absolutely right most politicians are flip-floppers to some degree. However I would argue that it matters what issue(s) a politician flip-flops on. To some flip-flopping on abortion may nor be a big deal to others it may be a huge deal.

  • @ryanthemadhatter You mean like Reagan switched from pro-choice to pro-life? Or how damn near every young person switches from liberal to conservative positions as they grow older all the time?

  • @markhamiowa Nice Try!! Romney is not a young person nor did he switch his position as young person! He switched because it was politically necessary!

    Romney was ROCK SOLID Pro-Choice at the age of 55 in the Massachusetts Gubernatorial campaign and then a ROCK SOLID Pro-Lifer at the age of 61during the 2008 GOP Primaries. Here's the video: youtube.com/watch?v=cFMdK0TWtk­s

    "Don't piss on my leg and tell me its raining!"

  • @ryanthemadhatter lol. ummmm. This is awkward. did you read my comment sir? I said he either did it legitimately, or he did it for political reasons. My only point is that Newt does it too. They Both ....gasp....change positions to court votes!!!! *faints*

  • @ryanthemadhatter oh, and Ronny was older when he changed. But he was from hollywood, so he can be forgiven.

  • @markhamiowa You mean Reagan? Forgiveness?

    You don't 'forgive' a politician for changing his stance on a political issue. Flip-Flopping is a matter of trust. Reagan was obviously someone we could trust. Romney isn't Reagain; biological fact; and I along with other people don't know if we can trust him due to his flip-flops.

  • @markhamiowa 1) the 'social engineering' comment is taken completely out of context. He was trying to explain how to make it more passable by including options for citizens who want out. It's very clever.

    2) Newt never supported the Mass. health law.

    3) Read Newt's book on conservative environmentalism. He clearly doesn't buy into that stuff.

    You see, brilliant people tend to talk a LOT because people want to hear what they say. Over a 50 year career, finding out of context remarks is easy.

  • @Christobanistan 1) if it's so clever, why did he issue an apology? look, im not saying what he actually ever believed, im saying he positions himself politically to look good to whatever audience he has to impress.

    2) He did support it when he wrote a paper...ya know...supporting it. As he did in 2006. Did he actually support? or was he throwing weight behind a governor who was taking the lead on an issue Dems had failed at for years. Who knows? not my point.

    3)I'm well aware of his ....

  • @markhamiowa 1) Politics. Duh.

    2) You lie. Quote the paper.

    3) Apparently you're not.

  • @Christobanistan

    lol. a search gives you about 80billion results. He wrote a letter to Romney. and yeah. POLITICS! just like when romney FLOPS. He was gov in mass-a friken chusetts. Excuse him if he has some positions he had to cave on.

  • @Christobanistan teddy roosevelt conservationism, but that didn't stop him from saying their is a high liklihood climate change is real in 2007. Did he believe it? Who knows. My point is, he flippys and he floppys when he has to. Then he calls you an idiot for misinterpreting him. Oh, and he cheated on his wife.

  • @markhamiowa Climate change IS real. He didn't say it was man made, though, and even challenged that.

  • @Christobanistan “We agree entirely with Governor Romney and Massachusetts legislators that our goal should be 100 percent insurance coverage for all Americans,” Gingrich wrote in 2006.

    And you are right about the climate change claims he makes, but he never clarified them until 2009, and even then remained agnostic. He rides the fence, and then pushes whatever idea suits a room. this is fine of course, but how in gods name does it make him better than Romney is what i dont get.

  • @markhamiowa You have to be thick as a rock. Newt has advocated for a long time universal coverage, and has outlined how to do it with conservative, purely private, market based solutions. Saying you agree on the goal has NOTHING to do with the method.

  • @Christobanistan grrrrrr. Go to the paper!!! He wrote it after Mitt had passed the legislation. Please just go read. I an not being thick. I am pointing out that he full of shit, which does not make him unique in politics because mitt is full of shit too. pleeeeeaaaasssseeee just go look this stuff up yourself. It's not hidden, except to those who dont want to find it.

  • @markhamiowa I am sure you could provide better quotes, if what you are saying were true. It's not.

  • @Christobanistan gingrich's greatest quality, is making a BS answer feel like one of conviction. The man has none. But you would never be able to tell that just by listening to his words.

  • @markhamiowa Like which answer in particular? Be exact.

  • @Christobanistan Other people who have more character than newt. Paul, Santorum, Huckabee, McCain....and on and on and on. Including, Obama. Bad president. But he hangs in there in the polls because he is a scandal free family man. You can deny it's importance all you want, but it matters. Especially for republicans. Clinton didnt have to make arguments against abortion and lack of family values. Gingrich will.

  • He did not say he supported Rockefeller over Goldwater. He was a Rockefeller local leader in 1968 when Nixon ran, not 1964 when he wasn't even old enough to vote.

  • @rgoing You need to study your history. Newt was born in 1943 and he was old enough to vote in 1964. Just five years before the 1994 “revolution” Gingrich was identifying himself with the most moderate wing of the Republican Party. Interesting, to say the least.

  • @gardentoolnumber5 Ron Paul's most endearing quality is that he flat-out refuses to pander to the mainstream public. Which is also he biggest flaw. He can't win an election because of that. The far left-wing presidents who get in, get in because they run on more moderate platforms, and then instill their agenda after the election. Ron Paul, love him, refuses to do it. he wants his argument to win on merit. It's just that it's not going to happen.

  • Actually many of us DO care about what is true. That is why there are alot of die-hard Ron Paul supporters who are willing to risk all to support someone who actually is honest.

    ~Chris

    Norfolk, VA

  • @hillbillyconservativ plus, Nixon wasnt really much more conservative than Rockefeller except on Crime. and Nixon had already proved once he could lose an election. that being the case doesn't rockefeller look like the most conservative guy who could win in january or so of 1968.

  • gingrich is a rothschild lapdog.. RON PAUL 2012

  • Ya know, Reagan used to be a Democrat. This video (dated 4-11-88) doesn't reveal reveal anything concrete. it's misleading.

  • Thanks for the clip!!!! His lies never end...Hell I hope something big comes out against this guy...

  • @151310864 HIS NAME IS RON PAUL

  • damn he got fat

  • Here's hoping that people see through this clown. Ron Paul 2012 :)

  • I like this video only in the sense it tells the truth. I detest the subject person, Newt Gingrich.

    Caught in another BOLDFACE lie!

    ~Chris

    Norfolk, VA

  • Ron Paul is the only candidate whom Ronald Regan endorsed. Listen to RP then listen to this .... /watch?v=yt1fYSAChxs

  • FUNDAMENTAL!

    

  • Newt is an inspiration to any man who ever plans to cheat on his wife. Or divorce her when she is ill. Or to do both of those twice. #america

  • Ron Paul is your friggin last chance people! In five years it will be too late. Don't cry your sorry ass if you pass on Paul. Listen to the man and do yourself favor! It's your responsibility to educate your fellow voter! This country is falling to the ground like a space shuttle. Save it and rest of the world from becoming shuttle Columbia. Ron Paul people! RRROONNN PAAAUULLLL

  • Look, Romney is not a great candidate. But he doesn't have to be a great communicator to win this next election. But this weasel gingrich cannot get the nomination. He will not only lose, what with his 60% unfavorability rating, he will actually drag down the party, causing Republicans to lose the tights seats they took from democratic districts in 2010. Gingrich may be a good think, but he is a bad person. that matters.

  • Liar, liar... and this guy is picking up endorsements? Man, we are in trouble. When a man of integrity, who follows the Constitution, is defamed as a nut and the Neoconservatives get the nod, get ready for more war, more debt, bigger government.

    Ron Paul 2012. The only true conservative on the stage.

  • @gardentoolnumber5 He's not a nut, he's just not a good politician and refuses to deal in political reality. I like him, and if he toned some stuff down he honestly would have had a shot to win. But tearing down the entitlement society that has already been established would take decades. He refuses to acknowledge that. America withdrawing militarily from the world is a reasonable position, but it has to be gradual. Our system moves slow, and he refuses to accept that. Sucks, but it's reality.

  • @recker24 Thank you for your reply. Ron Paul doesn't want to dismantle our entitlement system overnight. As you mention it has been going on to long. He would like to bring the troops home and take care of our people who need it, the elderly and injured. But, he would allow the young to get out from the burgeoning welfare system that is crippling our society, so they may start taking care of themselves. There isn't going to anything for them, let them get out. Stop the pyramid schemes.

  • @gardentoolnumber5 I respect Ron Paul. He's the most consistent, fearless guy in the race. And he has resurrected that ideology and given it prominence within the republican party again. It's just that it's a tough sell. Honestly, i think most people view it the way the way they view socialism, in that it is this incredibly pure ideology, that seems so great and fair on paper, but just cannot realistically be applied to the real world and work the way you want it to.

  • @recker24 We can see you do have respect. Contrary to most comments from those against Dr. Paul. Ty. We have had socialism for so long, it is up to us to change course. We have had the big government party since we were sold out to the central bankers. Why can we vote a far leftest in, but we never get the correction of a far right? We always get a Neocon from the right and bigger gov. It just continues to grow. War hincreases taxes.

  • @recker24 Sorry, hit the return by mistake. Here's the full quote i was going to paraphrase. "War involves in its progress such a train of unforeseen and unsupposed circumstances that no human wisdom can calculate the end. It has but one thing certain, and that is to increase taxes." -Thomas Paine

  • Rockefellers? The family that gave money to the Nazis and started the eugenics movement in the United States. No surprise there.

  • We know Newt loves and adores FDR.....here Newt calls himself a Wilsonian.... /watch?v=T76lD4zV1bo

  • Newt did campaign with Goldwater in 1976, there are photos of them campaigning together, although YouTube won't let me post links.

  • @sickoftalking  Post them on your channel then.

  • @SheyOneTen I can point to the articles. On LegalInsurrection . com, look up an article titled "Newt-Goldwater 1976". On ajc . com (Atlanta Journal Constitution) look up "Gingrich fostered Georgia GOP rise". They both have photos of Goldwater and Gingrich campaigning together.

  • Being the biggest douchebag in politics is no small feat. If the GOP nominates this guy, they can kiss this election goodbye.

  • newt is scum!

  • We will not win with Gingrich in office. If Gingrich is on the card, then you liberals have it in the bag. Newt talks a good game but he has changed his footing so many times he has lost grasp. But what do you expect from a womanizer?

  • Newt won another debate.

  • @usaustinTX Of course he did.

  • personal attacks are unpersuasive. Did Newt support Goldwater as the party nominee or not? I suspect most of the people commenting here weren't around in 1964 to even know. Show some intellectual curiosity and interest and investigate the issue rather than assume the worst just because you prefer someone else.

  • Geez. Obama, plus the Democrat Machine will savage NEWT.

  • Didn't he just say he was for Goldwater during the debate tonight? Yet Romney gets the flip-flopper tag.

  • Quick someone call Romney.

  • If you have the a minute or two more, it would be helpful. People will claim that this statement was taken out of context.

    .

    Hes not even a Liberal. Hes a control freak futurist.

  • To think he has the audacity to call himself a conservative now.

  • He was quite a bit skinnier back then.

  • And he has the NERVE to call Romney a "Massachusetts Moderate." Why doesn't Romney or some media personality CALL him on this! What a hypocrite!