If you listen to the man, you whole PMR, stops you from accepting this. You meant to learn in this PMR, Maybe evolution and time will give us the ability naturally, but as it is now, only certain individuals can experience this. If you mind is wired to process this then you can't very simple.
If this man is really a proffesor in physics and logic, then he should know better than to play god, he should realize that he has not visited alternate realities, he should stop playing god and start focusing on the important things.
@bane7667 he should "start focusing on the important things" you say... like life the universe and everything you mean? Maybe you need to hear the lecture again...
Easy, Muad'Dib. Frank Herbert- type- you have to grow a beard and wear a stilsuit to understand this. Sorry, but free will is a dangerous idea. Have you ever done anything out of your own will? I don't see a lot of Nietzschean over-men walking around under the chemtrails. I see people reliving the movies and games they play. This isn't free will, this is slave mimic garbage. Kind of sad. The sleeper must awaken, like David Lynch wrote.
He started ok, but by part 7 out of the blue he said he had visited alternate univerves, and so can you! From there on he had no credibility to me. I'll keep watching just to see how deep the rabbit hole goes. Fortunately for him there's a market for his delusions!
Thoughts, opinions and analysis are fine whilst watching. But how can you rule anything completely out? Do you know for 100% sure that he has not travelled between parallel realities?
We are human beings. microscopically small in the context of only our own universe. Most of us only use a small fraction of our brain capacity! Im not prepared to rule anything out...
@TheGibbatizer It's unlikely anyone with solid scientific/philosophic education would disagree how limited our understanding of reality is. However when a bold claim is made, the data must be at hand to back it up. You can't make stuff up with science.
You are "not prepared to rule anything out", it is also wise not to be prepared to "rule anything in" without evidence. Many charlatans out there.
I part with a quote by Carl Sagan: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". Best.
Good point and good quote, but at the beginning of this lecture Dr Thomas Campbell asked the audience to open their mind and basically 'believe' what he's saying otherwise we would be incapable of understanding.
Regardless of whether it's true or not that he has in fact visited these other realities. I think the hypothesis of needing to believe in order to understand is valid and reasonable...
Personally, I believe him. At least I believe that he is not lying...
@TheGibbatizer I agree with you that an "open mind" is indeed the proper way to approach the presentation of a new "theory", however, a healthy dose of skepticism is even more so! As I said in a previous post, until video #7 his points seemed plausible, until he began stating the unverifiable. Here is the crucial moment where a claim about the nature of the universe & empirical evidence(or data) departs from science. Since he can't prove his alleged visits to alt. Universes, I'm skeptic.
@esiosan Subjectivity is not provable as such. No one can prove their day to anyone else but you still experienced it. If its there its accessible through whatever means you seek, his info is there to open doors, but common factors will make themselves known to you as there are constants. Id recoimmend some Salvia or DMT :P
I just read a new book, God vs Satan Untold Story, by a new thinker on this topic. Who seems to have all these ideas, and more. He ties them into not only explaining God and Satan, but into politics, racial behavior, and modern political economical problems. If you like Campbell, you'll love the new guy.
I just read a new book, God vs Satan Untold Story, by a new thinker on this topic. Who seems to have all these ideas, and more. He ties them into not only explaining God and Satan, but into politics, racial behavior, and modern political economical problems. If you like Campbell, you'll love the new guy.
mc timeline is this: 2012 is going to unfold just as predicted. The conscience evolution of this "string" will be plucked and we will pluck it ourselves. We've almost arrived. I'm a 56 year old single working mother living in the suburb of a large city. "How come I know so much?" Because the clues have been laid before me my whole life and I just followed them. I didn't ignore them, you know the ones. I wish I had. Life would have been simpler, beautiful. Instead I keep looking for clues nonstop
My only problem with this is that if consciousness is a digital information system, and this system can calculate out 'unactualized' histories, wouldn't these 'unactualized' histories technically be consciousness in itself and therefore are in fact 'actualized'?
If conciousness didn't chose it , it's quite reasonable that it conciousness would have a different effect, including the possiblility of no effect or minimal effect.
If you listen to the man, you whole PMR, stops you from accepting this. You meant to learn in this PMR, Maybe evolution and time will give us the ability naturally, but as it is now, only certain individuals can experience this. If you mind is wired to process this then you can't very simple.
Aaron4BZ 6 months ago
This database thing sounds a lot like the akashik records...
infinitesimotel 7 months ago
Why would you want to go OUT THERE? I want to know how to create my own reality, in my current reality.
leomnyc 7 months ago
The graphic of the possible choices the universe can make is a fractal...
katehtown 9 months ago
this man is brilliant; I understand about 10% of what he is saying
Greenhornet270 9 months ago 3
@Greenhornet270 listen to this a lot of times. LOL
Kostly 1 month ago
If this man is really a proffesor in physics and logic, then he should know better than to play god, he should realize that he has not visited alternate realities, he should stop playing god and start focusing on the important things.
bane7667 10 months ago
@bane7667 what important things?
sergyu123456 9 months ago
@bane7667 he should "start focusing on the important things" you say... like life the universe and everything you mean? Maybe you need to hear the lecture again...
LibbyJane71 4 months ago
interesting theories
kilianguntner 1 year ago
Easy, Muad'Dib. Frank Herbert- type- you have to grow a beard and wear a stilsuit to understand this. Sorry, but free will is a dangerous idea. Have you ever done anything out of your own will? I don't see a lot of Nietzschean over-men walking around under the chemtrails. I see people reliving the movies and games they play. This isn't free will, this is slave mimic garbage. Kind of sad. The sleeper must awaken, like David Lynch wrote.
hozayamz 1 year ago
Sometimes times gets smeared out into multiple timetracks due to a prior confusion of explosion that a being experienced.
ckpeltomaa 1 year ago
He started ok, but by part 7 out of the blue he said he had visited alternate univerves, and so can you! From there on he had no credibility to me. I'll keep watching just to see how deep the rabbit hole goes. Fortunately for him there's a market for his delusions!
esiosan 1 year ago
@esiosan
Thoughts, opinions and analysis are fine whilst watching. But how can you rule anything completely out? Do you know for 100% sure that he has not travelled between parallel realities?
We are human beings. microscopically small in the context of only our own universe. Most of us only use a small fraction of our brain capacity! Im not prepared to rule anything out...
TheGibbatizer 1 year ago
@TheGibbatizer It's unlikely anyone with solid scientific/philosophic education would disagree how limited our understanding of reality is. However when a bold claim is made, the data must be at hand to back it up. You can't make stuff up with science.
You are "not prepared to rule anything out", it is also wise not to be prepared to "rule anything in" without evidence. Many charlatans out there.
I part with a quote by Carl Sagan: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". Best.
esiosan 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheGibbatizer 1 year ago
@esiosan
Good point and good quote, but at the beginning of this lecture Dr Thomas Campbell asked the audience to open their mind and basically 'believe' what he's saying otherwise we would be incapable of understanding.
Regardless of whether it's true or not that he has in fact visited these other realities. I think the hypothesis of needing to believe in order to understand is valid and reasonable...
Personally, I believe him. At least I believe that he is not lying...
TheGibbatizer 1 year ago
@TheGibbatizer I agree with you that an "open mind" is indeed the proper way to approach the presentation of a new "theory", however, a healthy dose of skepticism is even more so! As I said in a previous post, until video #7 his points seemed plausible, until he began stating the unverifiable. Here is the crucial moment where a claim about the nature of the universe & empirical evidence(or data) departs from science. Since he can't prove his alleged visits to alt. Universes, I'm skeptic.
esiosan 1 year ago
@esiosan Subjectivity is not provable as such. No one can prove their day to anyone else but you still experienced it. If its there its accessible through whatever means you seek, his info is there to open doors, but common factors will make themselves known to you as there are constants. Id recoimmend some Salvia or DMT :P
infinitesimotel 7 months ago
I just read a new book, God vs Satan Untold Story, by a new thinker on this topic. Who seems to have all these ideas, and more. He ties them into not only explaining God and Satan, but into politics, racial behavior, and modern political economical problems. If you like Campbell, you'll love the new guy.
lindazimmer 1 year ago
I just read a new book, God vs Satan Untold Story, by a new thinker on this topic. Who seems to have all these ideas, and more. He ties them into not only explaining God and Satan, but into politics, racial behavior, and modern political economical problems. If you like Campbell, you'll love the new guy.
lindazimmer 1 year ago
this guy needs help for his mental illness.
AEVautomatic 1 year ago
@AEVautomatic you mean consciousness?
ethankegley 1 year ago
mc timeline is this: 2012 is going to unfold just as predicted. The conscience evolution of this "string" will be plucked and we will pluck it ourselves. We've almost arrived. I'm a 56 year old single working mother living in the suburb of a large city. "How come I know so much?" Because the clues have been laid before me my whole life and I just followed them. I didn't ignore them, you know the ones. I wish I had. Life would have been simpler, beautiful. Instead I keep looking for clues nonstop
ToySoldierScorpion 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your big T.O.E got stuck in your mouth.
rbolo29 2 years ago
Comment removed
jerramy 2 years ago
sounds digital to me
thakook 2 years ago
My only problem with this is that if consciousness is a digital information system, and this system can calculate out 'unactualized' histories, wouldn't these 'unactualized' histories technically be consciousness in itself and therefore are in fact 'actualized'?
MugenTenkai 2 years ago
Comment removed
jerramy 2 years ago
Comment removed
jerramy 2 years ago
Comment removed
jerramy 2 years ago
Comment removed
jerramy 2 years ago
If conciousness didn't chose it , it's quite reasonable that it conciousness would have a different effect, including the possiblility of no effect or minimal effect.
newbetterandhappy 2 years ago
it sounds logical.
SANGSful 2 years ago
This hypothesis is testable. Odd that no one actually does an experiment to prove or disprove it,
crescentcityarts 2 years ago
@crescentcityarts He should to it himself since he is the one claiming it, if it is as you mentioned "testable".
esiosan 1 year ago
WOW, Very nice Job.
jarek916 3 years ago 4
love ur mind mista , thanx for this lesson
robbypoelstra 3 years ago