Tornado in a Junkyard: Interview with James Perloff

[Danielpryorat60]

My question was somewhat rhetorical. Can we really associate derogatory adjectives like stupid, ignorant etc., with virtues like “careful, reasoned and as free from prejudice as possible.” Sure you got this right? More ignorant than an average 3rd grader”? How did they do that? Wechslers for the 3rd grader and what for the dead guys?

[Mmmmmmmbacon]

Yes.... Science has proven that the bible is a Bunch of different myths and bad accounts of history made up by men who where more ignorant than the average 3rd grader.

Revolution against reality....

Stupid, dull, waste of time...

[Danielpryorat60]

@Mmmmmmmbacon

Hmmm...and how did science prove this? Hmmmm

[Mmmmmmmbacon]

@Danielpryorat60 how did science prove this?

The same way it proves other things... by careful, reasoned inquiry, as free of prejudice as possible.

[AndyG792]

@Mmmmmmmbacon Please give references for your statement that science has proven the Bible as a bunch of myths ie scientific journals, books, papers, etc. I do not believe that any area of science has done any such thing. I believe that you are repeating what you have heard someone else say that also had no proof at all but the person he heard before him. Actually, archeological find have done nothing but show the Bible to be a very reliable source of historical information and more

[Mmmmmmmbacon]

@AndyG792 Too many! But let's start near the beginning.

"extensive archaeological work by Israeli archaeologist Eliezer Oren over a period of 10 years "failed to provide a single shred of evidence that the biblical account of the Exodus from Egypt ever happened" (Barry Brown, "Israeli Archaeologist Reports No Evidence to Back Exodus Story," News Toronto Bureau, Feb. 27, 1988)."

[Mmmmmmmbacon]

@AndyG792 And let's go a little further:

"The Bronze and Iron Age remains of the City of David, the original urban core of Jerusalem identified with the reigns of David and Solomon, were investigated extensively in the 1970s and 1980s under the direction of Yigal Shiloh of the Hebrew University, but failed to discover significant evidence of occupation during the 10th century BC,"

[AndrewRudin]

Gag me. Believe what you want. But the great thing about truth is that it's true WHETHER you believe it or not.

[HelloIm2]

The pseudoscience was fun. Let me ask though, how does the idea of God help us understand the creation of humans? In other words, what created God?

[Danielpryorat60]

@HelloIm2, great question. Has been asked and anwered more times than can be imagined. The field is called metaphysics. Plato, Aristotle, Anslem, Aquinas, DesCarte, Kant, Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, etc etc etc. List of philosopers responding to your question is endless. Try any library. As intro, try Openess of Being (Mascall)., or Metaphysics (Coreth) Warning, some tough reading. Better get started. Good luck. Eventually, for scholars and laymen alike, it's epistomology - faith.

[HelloIm2]

@Danielpryorat60 Sure, I've read plenty of metaphysics from Aristotle, DesCarte, and Kant. Rather than stating some smart, dead guys names, you should give me a few points that you find convincing. Essentially, what created God? If there must be a God to create the universe, there must also be a God to create that God, correct?

[Danielpryorat60]

@HelloIm2 Only allowed 489 chrctrs. Lucky for you. If you'd read plenty of metaphysics you'd not be asking trite questions. I gave you resourses and you blew them off. Ontology? Verisimilitude? Do you agree or disagree that existence is predicate? Support your answer in 489 chareacters or less, convincingly, please. Where have you demonstrated a definition of "God" proving that "He" cannot exist if "He" creates? How do Kant, Descartes and Aristotle answer your question? Let's start there.

[MrSandykramer]

@HelloIm2

Everything which had a beginning had a creator. God ( or creative force, if you prefer ) is eternal. The creative force exists outside of time, space, and matter.

[AndyG792]

@HelloIm2 Quite the contrary, the Bible tells us specifically how God created humans and that is our understanding. To ask what created God is to not understand who God is. You can not continue to ask what caused the cause that caused the previous cause, and continue to ask that into eternity. You will never find the original cause that way. There has to be a cause that didn't have a previous cause at some point. God is that uncaused cause.

[MaximusArurealius]

6. Another cause of evolution is genetic drift, an independent process that produces entirely random changes in how common traits are in a population. Genetic drift comes from the role that chance plays in whether a trait will be passed on to the next generation.

Wiki fails to say that this is purely made up conjecture and wishful thinking. Looks like the mistakes in Wiki just keep going on and on.

PWNED ONE MORE TIME -- I OWN WIKI

[MaximusArurealius]

EVOLUTION MISTAKES IN WIKI

1. Evolution is the change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms through successive generations. After a population splits into smaller groups, these groups evolve independently and may eventually diversify into new species.

Key word "may." There has never been a NEW species appear. EVER

[samarjithrichomaster]

@MaximusArurealius brilliant 

[MaximusArurealius]

@samarjithrichomaster You must be wanting to see my whack down of the evolution theory of vestigial organs?

[samarjithrichomaster]

@MaximusArurealius sure! that would be great! i am interested in all your materials! thanks

[MaximusArurealius]

1. No such thing as a vestigial anything. #1The very idea of it is circular logic. It's a case of evolution proving vestigial structures and vestigial structures proving evolution. It's the same as the fundies who use the Bible to prove the Bible. #2 Evolutionists don't even understand their own theory. If these "vestigial" structures were growing into some kind of useful organ that would be evolution, but that isn't what is happening.

[MaximusArurealius]

2. #3 This is purely an example of argument from ignorance. We don't know what they are so they MUST be vestigial. Every day science discovers the actual usefulness of one after another of these structures proving they are not vestigial at all. There were once considered to be 180 vestigial organs (organs of no use that evolutionists use to say we evolved out of).

[samarjithrichomaster]

@MaximusArurealius BRAVO! i know its religion, but why so many scientists belong to it, if not 90% of the scientists, are they atheist because evolution disaporve religion or they were atheists before getting introduced to evolution??

and it would be great if you could do a video on evolution! thanks a lot MUCH APPRECIATED!

[MaximusArurealius]

@samarjithrichomaster Actually stevebee92653 has done some great videos. I don't think I can beat his. Start with this one, watch?v=kI_R1p6qcT4 and tell me what you think. That one is on the evolution of skin and after that you should watch evolution of birds. They are great.

[samarjithrichomaster]

@MaximusArurealius yep! i love his videos too, im quite familiar with his videos, and just my wish many could do that! coz youtube is loaded with atheists, they just want to mock something they wont believe just to feel superior just making fools of themselves! God help them!

[MaximusArurealius]

3. Today, there are medically regarded as being no vestigial organs. For example, the appendix is noted as able to fight infection in early life and tonsils destroy harmful bacteria. #4 If they are vestigial they are devolving not evolving. Losing an organ from lack of use is not evolution. How can you call "if you don't use it, you lose it" evolution? The real name for it is "atrophy" and that is anything, but evolution.

[MaximusArurealius]

4. Why isn't there a list of structures that are developing into new improved organs? #5 Why is it assumed that these structures are being lost? The appendix, could certainly be an organ that is evolving into something more useful. Why aren't they looking at it from that angle? Is it because they know they can't prove it so they just say it's something being lost while not really knowing?

[MaximusArurealius]

5. If evolution were true there should be at least ONE organ somewhere that is evolving into something useful, but there isn't. Evolutionists don't understand their own screwed up theory.

[MaximusArurealius]

THE BIG LIE

7. Evolutionary biologists document the fact that evolution occurs, and also develop and test theories that explain its causes.

Evolution is not a fact and has neither been observed nor documented. Wiki lied, not true, they don't have a test to prove that man evolved from monkeys, apes or anything else. Wiki fails to mention that.

WIKI MISTAKES ON EVOLUTION: MORE HORSESHIT TO FOLLOW

[MaximusArurealius]

8. This powerful explanatory and predictive theory has become the central organizing principle of modern biology, directing research and providing a unifying explanation for the history and diversity of life on Earth.

They fail to mention that all they are using is the fact that there is variation in "kinds" and claiming it is evolution. Looks like when the creationists figure out that the evos are using creation science and calling it evolution they'll get a real laugh. HAR HAR HAR

[MaximusArurealius]

9. Evolution is therefore applied and studied in fields as diverse as ecology, anthropology, conservation biology, paleontology, agriculture, medicine, psychology, philosophy and others.

HAR HAR HAR HAR what a load of bullshit. Here they are using creation science and calling it evolution. EPIC FAIL

SUPER BULLSHIT NEXT

[MaximusArurealius]

10. Genes vary within populations, so organisms show heritable differences (variation) in their traits. The main cause of variation is mutation, which changes the sequence of a gene. Altered genes or alleles are then inherited by offspring. There can sometimes also be transfer of genes between species.

Next they fail to mention that mutations are 100% detrimental. No mutation nor group of mutations has ever produced a new species. Notice that last line? "transfer of genes between the species?"

[MaximusArurealius]

11. Extinction is the disappearance of an entire species. Extinction is not an unusual event, as species regularly appear through speciation, and disappear through extinction.

Wiki lied again. There are NO new species "regularly" appearing to replace those that have gone extinct. As if species are coming and going. FAIL

EPIC PWN

[MaximusArurealius]

12. Nearly all animal and plant species that have lived on earth are now extinct, and extinction appears to be the ultimate fate of all species.

WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT? What happened to the coming and going of species? And they are now calling extinction -- evolution. HAR HAR HAR

WIKI FAILS -- PWNED

[MaximusArurealius]

13. In medicine, this contributes to the spread of antibiotic resistance, as when one bacteria acquires resistance genes it can rapidly transfer them to other species.

MORE BULLSHIT FROM WIKI Grasse then points that bacteria are considered to have "stabilized a billion years ago!" Grasse regards the "unceasing mutations" to be "merely hereditary fluctuations around a median position; a swing to the right, a swing to the left, but no final evolutionary effect. PWNED

[MaximusArurealius]

14. Soon after the emergence of these first multicellular organisms, a remarkable amount of biological diversity appeared over approximately 10 million years, in an event called the Cambrian explosion.

MISTAKE the fossils of the Cambrian explosion happened in one instantaneous capture of all the animals in existence. The paleontologists say it shows that all these animals appeared SUDDENLY. The Cambrian explosion proves that there is no common ancestor.

[MaximusArurealius]

15. Wiki uses the Peppered Moth Hoax as an example of evolution.

They fail to mention that it is a debunked hoax. "The peppered moth experiments beautifully demonstrate natural selection—or survival of the fittest—in action, but they do not show evolution in progress, for however the populations may alter in their content of light, intermediate, or dark forms, all the moths remain from beginning to end Biston betularia."—Harrison Matthews

[MaximusArurealius]

University of Chicago evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne agrees that the peppered moth story, which was 'the prize horse in our stable', has to be thrown out. He says the realization gave him the same feeling as when he found out that Santa Claus was not real. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR POWNED!

WIKI IS DESTROYED, OWNED POWNED AND BONED

[MaximusArurealius]

ATTENTION FOLKS! PUBLIC NOTICE

MegaDouche thinks bickering and battling are the same. He definitely has serious mental problems. He thinks he is a psychotherapist. HAR HAR HAR

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

hi shitty christian

[MrMegatruth]

atheism could not have treated him that badly, he graduated from boston university in 1975. and his teacher was right, the bible has been proven wrong by science.

just another born again, god of the gaps christian.

[charadester]

You're speaking in cursory language that sidesteps the question. The scientific method requires detailed observation, hypothesizing, testing and interpreting. It also necessitates careful definition of terms, processes, and concepts. If you want to discuss a scientific theory, it's reasonable to begin with clarification of terms. Otherwise, if you choose to advance a religious belief or refute science based on preconceived conclusions, the that is your privilege as well.

[MaximusArurealius]

@charadester Moron, I am not advancing a religious belief. My religion does not forbid the belief in evolution. I believed in evolution because of that. Since then I studied science and found that your "science theory" is nothing more than a science fiction hoax. It's YOUR religion that's the problem not mine. I can believe either way. You have no choice.

[MaximusArurealius]

@charred ass, evolution is all based on preconceived ideology of atheism. It is not scientific by any stretch of the imagination. It's a bullshit hoax.

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius Luckily, I've endured verbal assaults much worse than yours. Try harder. Frankly, I don't deal with the original God issue, and I'm not an atheist. What I DO study is testable hypotheses and the resultant data obtained by the scientific method. There is no more rational, objective method of acquiring new knowledge in human culture, nor is there one that receives greater scrutiny. So to repeat the question, what is a theory in science, versus a law, or an hypothesis?

[MaximusArurealius]

@charredAss, verbal assaults? What verbal assault? You want a verbal assault? I can give you a verbal assault, but that hasn't happened yet asshole. You're not getting the point. You need to read a book so you can find out those things. No wonder you're having a problem. So to repeat, I am not here to explain things you should already know. Google "scientific theory" It is explained quite well. Maybe you will figure out that evolution is not scientific.

[MrMegatruth]

@charadester

max has narcissistic personality disorder, i am not kidding. look it up and see for yourself, he shows all of the symptoms of NPD. you may find max under his others aliases, brayingjackass, sockpuppet357 or moogoogaipancakes.

he is a loon, and he has described himself to me as a "shitty christian."  he is the worst sort of person, he is a hypocrite. it is fun to mess with him, to read what this "christian" posts is very funny, as well

[charadester]

@MrMegatruth Thanks so much for bailing me out. I had just about concluded that our conversation wasn't going to go anywhere. I ran into a similar character some time back. He just kept spewing strange rants, making unusual associations and such. Again, I appreciate your weighing in. Max should really apply a little soap, though to his mouth. He's got some really foul language!

[MrMegatruth]

@charadester

you are welcome, i am battling him on another video right now.

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, battling??? har har har scooter, you can't do a battle of wits. You are completely unarmed. hahahahaaaaaa BTW bickering is not any form of battle you ninny. whine whine whine

[MaximusArurealius]

@charredAss, here you are with no idea of what scientific theory means, you keep asking me because you don't know how to use google, and that's all you have. Yes time for you to conclude. hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius I've been advised about you. End of 'discussion'.

[MaximusArurealius]

@charredAss, advised about me? HAR HAR HAR I feel greatly honored. Bye chickenshit.

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius In 99% of individuals, your behavior ended by the 3rd grade. Please seek help.

[MaximusArurealius]

@charredAss, hey shithead, since I am only in the 2nd grade, I still have another year to fuck with you. HAR HAR HAR

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius Missing link.

[MaximusArurealius]

@charredAss, tell whoever advised you thanks I sincerely appreciate it. Was it that little turd lumper MegaDouche? HAR HAR HAR HAR

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius In the vast majority of normal developing children, the bathroom profanity stage ends around the age of ten. Get help.

[MaximusArurealius]

@dumasster, it's so easy to just Google "scientific theory" so just do it and don't be bothering me OK?

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

you are a credit to your religion max

mathew 22 max mathew 22

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, thanks asshole. 

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

you're welcome shitty christian

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, turd eating test flunker. hahahahahahaaa

Test Score 7%

OWNED

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

dynamite comeback for a christian

mathew 22 max

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, absolutely turd eater. har har har har



Test score 7%

OWNED

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

anyway, did you ever find out what this perloff guy is a doctor of? it seems like atheism did not hurt him too much, he graduated from boston university. and his grade school doctor is still correct.

btw, tell us how god pulled the legs off of snakes or maybe you can show off your faith in christ by acting like an asshole.

max = narcissistic personality disorder, look at his need to "own" others to satisfy his out of control ego

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, keep the laughter coming, keep the laughter coming. hahahaha

TEST SCORE 7%

I OWN YOU

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

more desire to own men, very weird max

yes, i got a 93%, you need to stop bragging about it. btw, what is perloff a doctor of?

seek help for your NPD, or just keep posting, because it is fun to laugh at you

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDoucheBag, Yes you got 93% wrong. I am glad you finally concede to that. hahahahahaaaaa If you want to know what Dr. Perloff is a doctor of, look it up moron. I am not telling you. HAR HAR HAR

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

you quote from this guy, and you can't even say what he is a doctor of?

hahaahahahahahaahahahahahahaha­hahaha

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDoucheBag, google him maybe you'll find out. hahahahaha

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

i think it is hilarious that you do not know

i am laughing at you again

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, I think it's hilarious that YOU don't know.

ROFL @ a moron. hahahahahahahaaaa

Test Score 7% hahahahahaaaaa

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

that's all you have?

really? nice try

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, it's ALL I need. hahahaha

YOU LOSE

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

really?  you have not made a point with any of it, except that you grade for shit

test score for max = 0%

how does it feel to fail your own test?

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, how does it feel to have failed MY test? MegaDouche's Test Score is 7%. hahahahahahaha

YOU LOSE AGAIN ASSHOLE HAHAHA

Keep the laughter coming moron, keep the laughter coming. hahahaha

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

you tell me, you failed it

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, is that all you can do is lie? hahahahaha

LOSER

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

what have i lied about?  you failed it

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, have proof? HAR HAR HAR

You idiot.

FAIL AGAIN

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

yes,

1-tell us again how god pulled the legs off snakes

2-you mention creationism in the answer key, automatic fail, based on your directions

sorry max

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, I see you don't have proof. As I thought. har har har har har You haven't seen the answer key. har har har you're just a pussy little liar who failed the test. Everyday you remind me how I have completely destroyed you with my test. har har har har all you're able to do now is yip yip. hahahahahhaaaaa

Keep the laughter coming moron, keep the laughter coming.

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

apparently you can ignore evidence, and then claim victory.

why don't you pass that answer key on to me, to check your work? i know you are lying

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, an idiot who can only answer 1 question out of 15 wouldn't know what to do with an answer key. I already posted to you all your mistakes so fuck off dummass. har har har har har har

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

really, i only got one right? so the snakes evolving from burrowing reptiles is not correct? so tell me max, what happened to the legs on snakes? you answered: that god pulled them off, but you said you were just kidding. so tell me what really happen to their legs? i know i got more than one question right. and if i did only get one right, who cares? i am still smarter than you and behave in a more professional manner than you, which is not hard to do.

max = NPD

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDouche, HAR HAR HAR HAR Test Score 7%

FAIL ASSHOLE

[MrMegatruth]

@MaximusArurealius

afraid to answer the questions max?

[MaximusArurealius]

@MrMegaDunce, you're dumber than a bucket of wet hammers. AND no you didn't get any other questions right you asshole. I have listed them all and you have had an opportunity to refute me, but you failed to do so.

[transtlantic]

@MaximusArurealius

lol..."God pulled their legs off"? lol...amazing christian science!

AHAHAHAHAHAH

retard.... you are so dumb...but heck..that's why you are a knot teacher.

[MaximusArurealius]

@transabortion, "ALL HORSES are born black" HAR HAR HAR

[transtlantic]

@MaximusArurealius

the breeds you mentioned have their young all born with a black color coat. go read their breed specificiations.

if you can't grasp context....wel... no wonder you think that God exists... you can't tell reality from fantasy.

[MaximusArurealius]

@transabortion, I didn't mention any breeds you stupid asshole. YOU said "ALL HORSES are born black" You're the fuck up. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR

[transtlantic]

@MaximusArurealius

LOL... you used a book written by two ignoramus to support your "gaining of genetic information"?!?!?!

LOL..try use a science textbook.

IN NOWHERE is written such, only in cretard books written by people without a degree, qualification in science.

[transtlantic]

@transtlantic

You did mention breeds, fucktard. want me to remind the breeds you mentioned?

you lose. i've debunked all of your crap.

"wallace and gerard"!?!?!? LOLOL people without any qualification in science, just like you, knot teacher.

[MaximusArurealius]

@transabortion, you're need my instruction. You're too stupid to tie your shoes. HAR HAR HAR HAR Darwin had no scientific credentials. That's really bothering you isn't it. YOU LOSE ASSHOLE

[transtlantic]

@MaximusArurealius

You can't be serious?

- Darwin went to Edinburgh University in October 1825 to study medicine

- Darwin became a keen student of Robert Edmund Grant, a Lamarckian anatomist. Grant had cited Erasmus Darwin in his doctoral thesis and shared the evolutionist ideas of Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire on evolution by acquired characteristics. Charles joined Grant in pioneering investigations of the life cycle of marine invertebrates on the shores of the Firth of Forth.

[MaximusArurealius]

@transLIAR, No I didn't mention any breeds. Why should I? You're the dummass saying "ALL HORSES are born black." hahahahahahahaaaa QUOTE ME DUMMASS. You can't because I didn't har har har har You're an idiot.

[transtlantic]

@MaximusArurealius

And i could go on and on the accomplishements of Charles Darwin, a very active academic since his early student years.

You did mention breeds, dumbass (btw... you can spell it this way).

I already quoted you, and in context, you didn't do the same for me. afterall... you are just like kent hovind: intelectual dishonesty by all means possible,

[MaximusArurealius]

@transabortion, Let me make it easy for you dummass. Evolution doesn't exist and doesn't do anything. You have failed to prove even one thing about evolution. You're an uneducated idiot who believed what his teachers told him and never questioned it. Evolution is proven to be a hoax.

PWNED hahahahahahhaaaaaaa

[transtlantic]

@Maxasshole.

Retard... you just asserted crap. You didn't prove anything. I asked you to explain antibiotic resistance without using evolution. you couldn't do it! you HAD to use the theory of evolution! I asked you to explain me adenoids problems, variety in life, mutations that originate phenomena like Down syndrome and EVERY SINGLE TIME the answer relates to the theory of evolution! never to your IDiocy!

if you think ID is "good", why don't you use it to explain me antibiotic resistance?

[MaximusArurealius]

@transabortion, EVOLUTION MISTAKES IN WIKI

1. Evolution is the change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms through successive generations. After a population splits into smaller groups, these groups evolve independently and may eventually diversify into new species.

Key word "may." There has never been a NEW species appear. EVER

[MaximusArurealius]

2. A nested hierarchy of anatomical and genetic similarities, geographical distribution of similar species and the fossil record indicate that all organisms are descended from a common ancestor through a long series of these divergent events, stretching back in a tree of life that has grown over the 3,500 million years of life on Earth.

ANOTHER LIE ON WIKI no such thing as a common ancestor. Pure conjecture and assumption. PWNED

[transtlantic]

2. A common ancestor DNA motif for invertebrate and vertebrate hormone response elements.

EMBO J. 1991 February; 10(2): 263–268.

where is the "made up conjecture"? there's obviously THOUSANDS of genes with homology between species and we see fossil evolution therefore....

you just asserted again and it was easy to debunk your crap...again.

[MaximusArurealius]

3. Evolution is the product of two opposing forces: processes that constantly introduce variation in traits, and processes that make particular variants become more common or rare.

They fail to mention that there is no proof of such a thing. And the neither of these forces have ever produced a new species or a new organ of any kind. Another mistake in Wiki.

[transtlantic]

3. you just asserted....again.

antibiotic resistance results in the origin of a new molecular structure in prokaryotes. we don't see human bones at the same time as a t-rex, therefore the evolution of humans is quite obvious.

And...ofc there is proof for "such a thing" - antibiotic resistance.

again...madmax is in denial.

[MaximusArurealius]

4. Genes vary within populations, so organisms show heritable differences (variation) in their traits. The main cause of variation is mutation, which changes the sequence of a gene. Altered genes, or alleles, are then inherited by offspring. There can sometimes also be transfer of genes between species.

HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR check that out. "transfer of genes between the species" The Miracle of Evolution. HAR HAR HAR HAR

PWNED

[transtlantic]

4. Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Aug;9(8):605-18.

Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution.

again... you exposed your ignorance by asserting your denial.

sucks to be you maxasshole...

yet i have no single mistake at the wikipage about evolution. just a ranting psychotic fuckup knot teacher who asserts a bunch of baseless crap.

No wonder it's EASY to win against any cretarded fuckup. you just assert: "there is no..." and then comes the rational person showing the evidence for you to deny. ;)

[transtlantic]

1. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:561-88.

The role of hybridization in plant speciation.

any university with a biology degree as a database with new species appearing and evidence for thousands of species evolution.

therefore right at point one it's quite easy to prove you are in denial.

[MaximusArurealius]

@transabortionist, You're so fucking mixed up you don't know WHAT evolution does or doesn't do. You're a basic 3rd world dummass.

[transtlantic]

@MaximusArurealius

I know perfectly well what is evolution. Evolution doesn't "do" a thing, idiot. it's a theory. The law of gravity also doesn't "do" a thing. It's a ungoldy, unintelligent phenomena. Matter interacting with matter.

You are the 3rd world ignoramus max, who the fuck earns a living for teaching how to make knots? i bet  you even have to beg at the local church.

[MaximusArurealius]

@transabortion, BTW I notice that you are totally unable to produce any context proving me wrong. HAR HAR HAR HAR

[Webbber222]

Has it ever occurred to anyone that both the theory of evolution, and christianity (or any other religion) are fataly flawed

[jsbarbee]

There apprears to be no supported scientific basis for the author's position. Instead, he seems to be trying to refute a scientific theory because he wishes the Earth's history was something other than what the evidence indicates. This is essentially a recruiting film via condemnation of the competition without a basis in science. I'm so glad that this is not permitted in classrooms teaching evolutionary biology. I look forward to a career in battling this type of non-science.

[MaximusArurealius]

@jsbarbee You mean to tell me that you're a biologist and have yet to figure out that evolution is a hoax? You're a complete fucking idiot.

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius Regarding your comment to jsbarbee, there are two ways to converse here. One is to conduct a civil discussion with reasonable justifications for your positions. The other is to fire insults at others in an effort to spawn an argument. Which do you feel you're doing?

[MaximusArurealius]

@charadester I prefer to fire insults at ignorant assholes who believe in the evolution hoax. There is no way the fucking morons are going to listen to reason. I've already tried that now I am taking a new tack with it. So fuck you.

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius This ignorant asshole and fucking moron is waiting for your reasons for opposing evolutionary theory.

[MaximusArurealius]

@charadester My reasons? Because it isn't a theory. It is a hoax. Why haven't you investigated it on your own to discover the reality of it? Unlike you, I have an open mind and I did my own research to find out if it is true. It's not. Try reading the creationists sites. You might actually learn something about science. You sure won't learn science on any evolution sites. All you get are rationalizations and lies about it.

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius I am an evolutionary biologist, and the evidence from genetics, molecular biology, taxonomy, developmental biology, paleontology, and geology that I see, study, and intepret every day has led me to the unequivocal conclusion that evolution is an extremely well supported theory. I have no doubt of that. I might ask you your definition of a scientific theory first of all. That might help begin our discussion.

[MaximusArurealius]

@charadester Sorry, but I am NOT impressed and I need no instruction. The fossil record disproves evolution therefore biology means NOTHING. There has never been found a single instance of transmutation of species. All we have is variation within the species. No species has ever evolved into another species. My definition of a scientific theory? Don't bother. I understand the difference between an ordinary theory and a scientific one. I also understand the scientific method and evolution fails.

[MaximusArurealius]

@charadester BTW we are NOT going to have a discussion where you are instructing me as to how my view is mistaken until you have open mindedly read creationists sites. I suggest you start with the Kolbe Center and progress to The Evolution Handbook at evolutionfacts (dot) com.

[charadester]

@MaximusArurealius As part of my career, I have extensively reviewed the scientific credibility of creationist arguments from numerous sites including the Kolbe Center. I don't find them very compelling from a scientific perspective. You would be well served to do your own research regarding the wealth of evidence in support of the theory. Again I'll ask, since your definition appears puzzling...what is a scientific theory?

[MaximusArurealius]

@charredAss "I have extensively reviewed" you fucking liar. "from a scientific perspective" HAR HAR HAR you stuffed shirt asshole. You think calling something "scientific" makes it scientific or having more credibility than something that is not scientific? You're a fucking dunce. The term "kinds" is not a "scientific" term yet is far more accurate than the "scientific" term "species." The scientists can't even agree on what it means, but they get all uppity and say species is scientific. FAIL

[matinespl]

i dont understand that