thank you for uploading this it's gonna be a big help for research for my college final major project rand was fun to watch :) shame when coments turn from about the video to arguing over something pointless
Man! The last one was really funny and creative. I was amazed at how they managed complex concepts, like using the exclamation signs as tools, or moving from 2d to 3d so easily. These guys were real masters of the art creating this in the 20's, while most of today's cartoons, with all of the advancements aren't that good.
@MisterCoqui what the hell are you talking about? today's are far better.
if you want to compliment something.. then compliment it on its own merit. don't try to pick something else that is obviously better and drag it down to try to strengthen ur point. this is a perfect example of deceptive argumentation. and you're a prick, an idiot, and a liar for using it to make your shallow, nonexistent point.
i hate you and if we ever meet, i will kill you in cold blood right where you stand.
@sharpnova2 Well, s/he was stating that "with all of the advancements [today's cartoons] aren't that good." I for one think it is close to impossible to examine the amount of effort and creativeness put into an animation based on the available technology...and compare that to another animation of a different time.
@FMAiscool i think that's ridiculous. you can look at man hours that go into the product. or u can make a vague assessment of the creativity level of each individual, then weight the individual man hours by that.
you can factor for inflation and look at total cost. or cost per man hour. or cost * man hours.
there are so many metrics you can use.
i think if you're being objective (no rose tinted nostalgia glasses) you have to admit that today's have a higher relative production value.
@sharpnova2 man hours? person-hours :P and if you know of all the metrics, then could you send me the data? That would be impressive :)
Today's animations have a higher production value, but does that make it better overall? Besides nostalgia, there are other opinions to be considered. Felix the Cat was one of the earliest animations...they couldn't find much inspiration like present animators have. But....if you truly have a way of measuring a person's creativity....lol
@FMAiscool hmm.. the fact that you're looking at things through rose tinted glasses becomes even more apparent.
i unload dozens of potential metrics on you and that means nothing.
i think you have a really simplistic view of the world. you're probably not too familiar with math or statistics much and due to that.. it's easy for u to just "take a stance" without any thought.. and defend it on a purely emotional basis.
people with high iq's like me are unable to relate to people like you.
@FMAiscool it's in the untestable range. not many tests have any relevance for people like me. but i scored perfectly on mega and titan tests which shows with a reasonable confidence interval that i'm at least in the 5-6 standard deviation range. (what you'd call 175 to 190 iq on a 15 point standard deviation scale) keep in mind this is a deviation norming. not a ratio norming. in short the best way to express my intelligence is by saying things like "one in 100 million" to "one in a billion"
@FMAiscool oh. you understand people in my iq range so well you can determine that they wouldn't be commenting on youtube? no one in my range is in mensa. lol.
Mensa is a 2 s.d. group. a bunch of pseudo-intellectuals taking turns fanning each others' egos.
some perspective:
person A can qualify for mensa
person B is 1000 times rarer (intelligence wise) than person A
Actually, the swastika can be found in quite a few different cultures around the world, more usually as a sign of good luck (as is seen in THIS cartoon's clockwise orientation). Hitler put a literal negative spin on it, turning it into the symbol of hate we know today.
thank you for uploading this it's gonna be a big help for research for my college final major project rand was fun to watch :) shame when coments turn from about the video to arguing over something pointless
sharneyzoe93 1 week ago
Ghost dope 4:16 knock.
firedbacon77 1 year ago
Man! The last one was really funny and creative. I was amazed at how they managed complex concepts, like using the exclamation signs as tools, or moving from 2d to 3d so easily. These guys were real masters of the art creating this in the 20's, while most of today's cartoons, with all of the advancements aren't that good.
MisterCoqui 1 year ago
@MisterCoqui what the hell are you talking about? today's are far better.
if you want to compliment something.. then compliment it on its own merit. don't try to pick something else that is obviously better and drag it down to try to strengthen ur point. this is a perfect example of deceptive argumentation. and you're a prick, an idiot, and a liar for using it to make your shallow, nonexistent point.
i hate you and if we ever meet, i will kill you in cold blood right where you stand.
sharpnova2 1 year ago
@sharpnova2 Well, s/he was stating that "with all of the advancements [today's cartoons] aren't that good." I for one think it is close to impossible to examine the amount of effort and creativeness put into an animation based on the available technology...and compare that to another animation of a different time.
FMAiscool 11 months ago
@FMAiscool i think that's ridiculous. you can look at man hours that go into the product. or u can make a vague assessment of the creativity level of each individual, then weight the individual man hours by that.
you can factor for inflation and look at total cost. or cost per man hour. or cost * man hours.
there are so many metrics you can use.
i think if you're being objective (no rose tinted nostalgia glasses) you have to admit that today's have a higher relative production value.
sharpnova2 11 months ago
@sharpnova2 man hours? person-hours :P and if you know of all the metrics, then could you send me the data? That would be impressive :)
Today's animations have a higher production value, but does that make it better overall? Besides nostalgia, there are other opinions to be considered. Felix the Cat was one of the earliest animations...they couldn't find much inspiration like present animators have. But....if you truly have a way of measuring a person's creativity....lol
FMAiscool 11 months ago
@FMAiscool hmm.. the fact that you're looking at things through rose tinted glasses becomes even more apparent.
i unload dozens of potential metrics on you and that means nothing.
i think you have a really simplistic view of the world. you're probably not too familiar with math or statistics much and due to that.. it's easy for u to just "take a stance" without any thought.. and defend it on a purely emotional basis.
people with high iq's like me are unable to relate to people like you.
sharpnova2 11 months ago
@sharpnova2 yep, i'm sure that's the case lol
what is your iq? is it ridiculously high? :O then maybe you are smarter than me xD
FMAiscool 11 months ago
@FMAiscool it's in the untestable range. not many tests have any relevance for people like me. but i scored perfectly on mega and titan tests which shows with a reasonable confidence interval that i'm at least in the 5-6 standard deviation range. (what you'd call 175 to 190 iq on a 15 point standard deviation scale) keep in mind this is a deviation norming. not a ratio norming. in short the best way to express my intelligence is by saying things like "one in 100 million" to "one in a billion"
sharpnova2 11 months ago
@sharpnova2 so......why are you commenting on youtube? did you join Mensa? are you famous? :O
FMAiscool 11 months ago
@FMAiscool oh. you understand people in my iq range so well you can determine that they wouldn't be commenting on youtube? no one in my range is in mensa. lol.
Mensa is a 2 s.d. group. a bunch of pseudo-intellectuals taking turns fanning each others' egos.
some perspective:
person A can qualify for mensa
person B is 1000 times rarer (intelligence wise) than person A
person C is 1000 times rarer than person B still.
person C (like me) qualifies for giga society.
person B doesn't come close.
sharpnova2 11 months ago
I LOVE THESE SILENT CARTOONS!!!
Hypergalaxy 1 year ago
6:30 How are native-americans affiliated with nazis?
Virginityrocks 2 years ago
Actually, the swastika can be found in quite a few different cultures around the world, more usually as a sign of good luck (as is seen in THIS cartoon's clockwise orientation). Hitler put a literal negative spin on it, turning it into the symbol of hate we know today.
Bobzeaux 2 years ago
so much can be acomplished with out words =)
filEcanaeh 2 years ago
i eould love to make an animation like these old is good
puppyshade 3 years ago