As I said above, I don't have a dog in this fight. I've been doing work in generative grammar for a few years now and I'm much happier producing knowledge for the species. I think repudiation of philosophy is a sign of intellectual maturity. Also, I can't find a substantive point in your rebuttal, which sounds a lot like eristic ad hominen attack. Finally, what "semantic issues" does Dr. Brandom address? I don't see how anything mentioned in this talk addresses the desiderata of semantic theory.
Not sure what D.D. has to do with anything. My criticism was directed at his turgid presentation, not at the--comparatively anemic--content of his lecture. In any case, I don't really have a dog in this fight. Good luck with the complaisant armchair theorizing about the mind. The venom reflected in my initial comment is inspired by the intellectual dishonesty and shallow showmanship that has become endemic of certain corners of the world of academic philosophy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Brandom ought to go teach on the continent. I thought Anglo-American philosophy had left this kind of jargonistic wheel-spinning philosophy behind. Some of his locutions would make Judith Butler blush with envy. More theater than scholarship. An embarrassment to the profession.
@bon1931 Wow bon, if you don't recognize how this is a substantive and meaningful talk about Kant's philosophy by Brandom with his eye for semantic issues, then I suggest you go back to Philosophy 101. You sound like the embarrassment to Anglo-American philosophy for being so ignorant.
LOL its because "life is short, but the art is long" if you want to get as far as brandom has, you can't afford to waste any time shaving your face in the morning. That extra 10 minutes a day adds up. . .
This lecture is like a Mel Brooks movie: every time you watch it, you find something in it which you didn't see before. Astounding. thanks so much for posting this.
Comment removed
cirqueducarre 3 weeks ago
As I said above, I don't have a dog in this fight. I've been doing work in generative grammar for a few years now and I'm much happier producing knowledge for the species. I think repudiation of philosophy is a sign of intellectual maturity. Also, I can't find a substantive point in your rebuttal, which sounds a lot like eristic ad hominen attack. Finally, what "semantic issues" does Dr. Brandom address? I don't see how anything mentioned in this talk addresses the desiderata of semantic theory.
bon1931 10 months ago
@S2cents
Not sure what D.D. has to do with anything. My criticism was directed at his turgid presentation, not at the--comparatively anemic--content of his lecture. In any case, I don't really have a dog in this fight. Good luck with the complaisant armchair theorizing about the mind. The venom reflected in my initial comment is inspired by the intellectual dishonesty and shallow showmanship that has become endemic of certain corners of the world of academic philosophy.
bon1931 1 year ago
Oh and he wears a beard in emulation of David Lewis his incomparable teacher at Princeton.
bon1931 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Brandom ought to go teach on the continent. I thought Anglo-American philosophy had left this kind of jargonistic wheel-spinning philosophy behind. Some of his locutions would make Judith Butler blush with envy. More theater than scholarship. An embarrassment to the profession.
bon1931 2 years ago
I share your reservations about Continental obscurantism but most of this is pretty standard Kantian terminology, mostly from the third Critique.
GodlessPhilosopher 2 years ago
@bon
Well, you thought wrong and your biased view in favor of Anglophone philosophy is comical. Not familiar with Donald Davidson either, I take it.
S2Cents 1 year ago
@bon1931 Wow bon, if you don't recognize how this is a substantive and meaningful talk about Kant's philosophy by Brandom with his eye for semantic issues, then I suggest you go back to Philosophy 101. You sound like the embarrassment to Anglo-American philosophy for being so ignorant.
mcdonald928 10 months ago
why do all intellectual scholarly guys grow BEARD ?? some body has any answers ??
nibus9 3 years ago
LOL its because "life is short, but the art is long" if you want to get as far as brandom has, you can't afford to waste any time shaving your face in the morning. That extra 10 minutes a day adds up. . .
randyhelzerman 3 years ago
@nibus9 because they can
darkwaterhermit 1 year ago
@darkwaterhermit oooh you opened my eyes thanks..
nibus9 1 year ago
This lecture is like a Mel Brooks movie: every time you watch it, you find something in it which you didn't see before. Astounding. thanks so much for posting this.
randyhelzerman 3 years ago
I agree! No problem!
GodlessPhilosopher 3 years ago