Sadly he mentions, millions of years of evolution for the wolf. This modern day myth of millions of years of evolution flies in the face of his plea for freedom. Darwinism is an enemy to freedom. It's formed the basis of all modern fascist and communists states.
@coptnus Religion is a form of slavery Evolution has nothing to do with slaver it in fact is natures way not to be bond by fake rules that only exist in the minds of the weak minded man.
He sits motionless during the entire video except to make one very odd hand movement, why the Masonic hand gesture during this seemingly informative speech?
This video is made to look like it was from a movie that was produced by the late Aaron Russo - Mad As Hell, It is not!
"The table is tilted the game is rigged"...George Carlin
What is the producer of this video really trying to tell us?
Is he telling us that if we step out of line we will be killed..
its comical to me how people respond to this. they go along with their daily routine slightly pondering their life expectancy here. If over 20 percent of americans stopped working and stopped using the system and learned how to make their own damn food, the system would break and everything would snap into place, with opposing violence of course. this aint going to go down peacefully you poor hippies you had better take some shooting lessons
you are a slave to your own ignorance, white ppl where brought here by aliens from saturn. black ppl where killed off and their children was kidnapped all of us humans where forced to live in a city. whites are more easily to control so thats why whites are used as direct puppets to control everyone else.our pineal glands where turned off so we cant use magic and protect ourselves this is mans true slavery.....he does not know who he truly is
there is 350,000,000 (three hundred fifty million) United States citizens, that includes everyone man, woman and child. Now we owe 15 trillion, If you take 15 trillion and divide it by 350 million you get 42,857. That's what every body owes each. That's not including interest or the further debt that the government continues to spend every day. That means we are slaves. Put it this way at a 50% tax rate if you work 10 days 5 days of that goes to the government. SLAVERY
These kikes sure are getting desperate to educate and play the hero now that millions have discovered slavery, which was abolished by white christians, was a jewish institution and still is.
You are slave to your Ego, Everybody is programmed to be egotistical, it appears in high profile people (actors, leaders, musicians, rappers). Feed your mind to open your third eye (pineal gland). Welcome in the Truth that succeeds all moralities and endvenours, the feeble choir sing of redemption through tactics. But who is the real enemy? Your ego betrays your own morality. You must reprogram your whole persona to be humane. Everything contradicts itself to divide you into two sides...
@DroidEOD every planet has one race only so everyone on the face of this earth has been kidnapped and brought here by an alien race, no one knows who the original man of this planet but we do know he's brown so in reality we are all slaves
@DroidEOD these same aliens have us under slavery they make everything dumbed down for us so we can put it together like leggos, but none of us have the ability to create technology, not even the educated, without your pineal gland its a loosing battle.aliens are weak frail nerds who use telekenesis and quantum physics to controll us its their ego that is the problem not ours we are victims
why do these people alwyas so "you are subject to this" YOU the people YOU this and YOU that hicks did it carlin did it this guys doing it ,maxwell does it icke does it tsarion does it ,they mention "WE" about once or twice aginst the multiple times they talk to YOU ....hmmm mabye its just me
@reksub10 i will say in his defence though that he is speaking to an audience and he looks like he could be aborigional indian of the land therefore knows the history of his people and what white europeans and european migrants that stole all his and many others birthrights.....
@roninhall1970 yes rebellion over revolution anyday ..well said friend ,cos when you do a 360 in a revolution then youre bacxk where you started ,that is why the states ,after their revolution are now back in british rule under roman law upholding zionist agendas...or so ive been told ,but it adds up peace
Slavery exists in America today. They're called illegals. Undocumented Mexicans. They work for less than minimum wage, and California's very economy depends on them.
@ChipArgyle You sound ridiculous, "Nobody can agree to a wage below the minimum wage. That's illegal." Then why do they do it? Why do the sneak across the border, risking getting lost in the desert or captured by border patrol, to get a job in the U.S.? If they don't value the wage more than their time and risk getting here, why would they show up to work? Do the employers send out armed mercenaries to collect them every morning?
@ArmednSafe Actually a lot of them have realized the American Dream is over and they're now starting to head back to Mexico. Who will pick the fruit now?
@ArmednSafe It's the deregulated capitalist part of it that caused the problem. Took a long time. Clinton removed the key protective rules. Dubya let enforcement of what was left slide. Unchecked greed took over. All the money went to those who saw it for the taking. Now there's none left in the actual economy for anyone's use. Capitalism as you know it died once the term "too big to fail" entered the lexicon.
@ChipArgyle Well, I'll agree with one thing you said, and that's capitalism died when we accepted the idea of "too big to fail". But it was far from capitalism run a muck that caused this problem. The problem was a lack of capitalism, too much government meddling in the economy. People are greedy, but as much as they want more money, they don't want to loose the money they have. So, risk regulates greed. The problem is too many government guarantees and mandates.
@ArmednSafe Risk only regulates greed if risk is undertaken by the greedy. Once financial laws are broken by the greedy, or when asymmetry of information is used by the greedy to its advantage, the risk is transferred to the counter party of the transaction.
The cause of the problem is actually the reverse of what you suggested. It's not government meddling in the economy; it's corporations buying governments.
@ChipArgyle Financial regulation and guarantees shift the risk from the greedy to the public. Asymmetry of information ALWAYS exists. No two people know the same things.
The cause is similar to the chicken or the egg argument. Whether it's government selling special privileges or banks buying them is irrelevant. The problem is the government has the power to grant them. If we take away government's ability to print money and force us to do things, none of this moral hazard is possible.
@ArmednSafe I don't understand the first sentence of your reply. How do financial regulation and "guarantees" (define?) shift risk from the "greedy to the public"? (You're conversing with someone who has a degree in economics and and MBA, and who worked in the banking and investments businesses for 20 years, spending significant time in regulation on both the investment sales and industry oversight sides, so consider your answer very carefully.)
@ChipArgyle I can explain by example: The FDIC makes people not care what their banks do with their deposits, because who cares if they go tits up? The government will print the money and bail them out. Glass-Steagall was intended to counter act the damage done by the FDIC. By limiting what kinds of risky things deposit banks could do and separating out investment banks and deposit banks this helped suppress the moral hazard created by the FDIC. Without the FDIC banks would compete for security.
@ArmednSafe I see what you're saying, but FDIC isn't regulation; it's insurance. Is that the guarantee you meant? FDIC reduces depositor risk. It is risk-neutral and sales positive for banks by encouraging deposits. It doesn't change a bank's investment and lending policy. It protects depositors from bank insolvency. In the event of a bank's insolvency, depositors' funds would be repaid to a defined limit by insurance premiums collected from banks-no printing of money required.
@ChipArgyle It's not insurance because the issuer of the "insurance policy" is funded by taxes. The premiums aren't risk based, they are politically based. If the the insurance policy was issued by a private company that was trying to make a profit and couldn't steal from people like th government you'd be totally right. I didn't say that the FDIC required money printing, but it does facilitate inflation by supporting the fractional reserve system.
@ArmednSafe If the FDIC is at all taxpayer funded, then it's a fraud, ergo all economically grounded arguments about regulatory risk concerning it go out the window. That's a shame. Here in Canada, when it comes to overseeing financial institutions and their ancillary insurance corporations, we lead the world by example. Our CDIC is properly funded.
Regulation has rarely if ever been done properly in the US, so I understand your views. Ken Lay (Enron) actually handpicked his own regulators.
@ChipArgyle We'll see whether the CDIC is properly funded or not when Canadian banks that hold U.S. securities go bankrupt. If the CDIC goes bankrupt and it gets bailed out by the Bank of Canada or the Canadian government, then it is obviously not properly funded. Also, if paying premiums to the CDIC is required to be a bank in Canada, then it is not properly funded. A free market works only when people/companies can look out for their own best interests.
@ArmednSafe Canadian bank holdings of US assets aren't sufficiently material to bring them down.
"if paying premiums to the CDIC is required to be a bank in Canada, then it is not properly funded." Participation in CDIC isn't mandatory. But if it was, why would it be improper? All motorists are required to carry some form of insurance for damages to other parties, aren't they?
Are you saying that a free market stops working if a central body looks out for peoples' interests on their behalf?
@ChipArgyle We'll see whether Canadian banks are holding enough U.S. securities to bring them down or not. I'm willing to bet a number of them are.
If you're required to pay dues to an insurance company, what motive does the company have to make sure they are providing a valuable service. They could do absolutely nothing for you and make a good profit. Motor vehicle insurance is a good example of a failing insurance market. The answer to your last question is a resounding YES.
@ArmednSafe Insurance coverage IS the value of the service. So what if they profit without payout?
A resounding yes? I can ask anyone to provide any service for me, including protecting me from risks presented by others. How exactly does that harm a market?
Besides, with the number of products and companies that demand personal due diligence of us, there's no possible way anyone can adequately protect themselves from all risks presented. In present day, a true free market is a fairy tale.
@ChipArgyle My point is that if you don't have a choice whether to give them money or not, they have no incentive to look after something for you. You certainly have the right to delegate a responsibility to someone else but if you are forced to then you are no longer looking out for yourself.
I like to use the example of heart surgeons. If you need hear surgery you're going to go to a reputable hospital to find a surgeon, you won't interview them yourself (even though you have the right to).
i really enjoyed the comentary about the wolf, my heart sank in my chest, it makes me sad to think of the tyranny that is perpetually weakening the spirit of all things in the world. the world could be such a beautiful and wonderous place. tragic.
This is true of them, and they tell the rest of us that this is true of us! Lies! Most of us - THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF US - are good people, but since the psychopaths have the willingness to deceive us without having any guilt about it, we have been mislead into believing the. The truth is that they are talking about themselves when they say that humanity is evil. They are evil, and the love to position themselves in jobs where they can promote their evil. Don't believe them!
Regarding slavery - "It has been with us since the beginning of time on every continent and virtually every culture. . . " I gotta take exception to this statement. I agree that we are wage slaves to the International Bankers. I do not agree that the desire to enslave another is a characteristic of humanity. Humans are by and large - the overwhelming majority of them! - are good and kind and real and tolerant! It is only the psychopathic/sociopathic minority that wages war!
@JuanDeSoCal Well, you're simply saying that corporations are now the government.
The government is only a bunch of individuals who control a monopoly on violence and who uses this monopoly to get richer and more powerful. It doesn't really matter if that monopoly is held by an unelected clan, or some elected officials or some corporations. You can achieve the same awful results in each of those cases. The State is the problem it is the enemy of freedom, peace and prosperity for the honest man.
@JuanDeSoCal Who gave the governments their power? Why do Corporations lobby the government? Why don't they do the things they lobby for themselves? Do you want to know why? The government is the base of power and as long there is a base of power that people can lobby to create laws and violate rights. It's the government that is the problem because without the government there would be no corporations. No laws that violate your rights and freedoms.
I disagree. The government has the potential of being open to democratic action. That's exactly why it is constantly demonized by corporate power, and is constantly lobbied to by the corporations. Corporate power is not open to democratic action; they are private tyrannies, the fiefdoms of the modern world.
@JuanDeSoCal The government has the potential to be open up to powermongers, looters and tyrannical good-intentions. Democratic action is by definition mob rule.. where the majority can take from the minority at every en passe. It's because the government is the base of power that people lobby it. Corporate power is actually open to democratic action.. it's called shareholders... Btw, corporations get their power from the government.
"money is the material source of your freedom" Uh, no. While it may be true to say "money is the source of your material freedom" it doesn't work the other way around.
I agree with most of this otherwise, though without mention and explanation of the problem of the Corporation this speech seems lopsided, myopic. The true enemy of all mankind is Autocracy, is arbitrary beaurocracy acting without consent of those it affects. Until one day we can act cooperatively, we will never be free.
The government issues the currency, they want you to be locked into this system of control. It's NOT about controlling you through taxes. Taxes are not an invasion of your rights. That's a mild irritant... they want to control you through the money itself.
ASK YOURSELF....why can this guy say this and his youtube is still up? Ask yourself why my channel about horses and the gift of life has been impossible for me to get back into. Ask yourself something, before you "like" this or put it up on your youtube...etc.....because, now they are tracking YOU by WHAT you are LIKING....so, it s a great message, and I couldn't agree more...but when "
THEY: put their last move ON...they already KNOW WHO YOU ARE because you liked it...
@placeksue Jesus dude don't you realize that they don't have to be that controlling? The western system of politicoeconomic propaganda is so effective that videos like this can stay up. You want to know why?
Because the politicians, the capitalists and those who the sentiment in this video would seen overthrown know they're not in danger. They have enough of us hooked to tv and distracted in our personal lives that they know we'll never unite. It's going to take a lot to awaken America.
@randy0987 At this time in Human history, our survival is determined on a global basis.
We face the most awesome challenges that have ever confronted our race, the very fact that this planet is not yet an irradiated waste is no small miracle.. If we are to unite, to overcome our propensity to create social strata, to identify ourselves by skin colour, social class, or sexuality, we must do so on a scale never before imagined.
I hope this day comes soon, the clock is ticking for our species.
I suppose people who believe supporting the government is enslavement would prefer to be owned by the corporations they work for, where they have no choices in terms of goods but what the corporation provides? Where they would have to begin working at age 6? Clearly, history has not been learned.
The Ruling Class : The elitists, the central bankers, govt, big corp The Brutality Class: Police, courts, military The Propaganda Class: News, media, entertainment, comedians, intellectuals, scientists, religious ideologists The Slave Class: blue and white collar workers, small business owners, welfare recipients
The alternative is to go into the wilderness with supplies and start over..there is a choice (watch for the brutality class, though)
Randey Weaver made and sold automatic firearms, while I don't have a problem with it, the laws at that time did. David Koresh purchased automatic firearms and had a stockpile of explosives, grenades, and other military grade weapons. So saying they had not done anything wrong is a bit of a stretch. As for slavery, we are slaves only if we allow ourselves to be considered so. Slavery in the modern day is in the mind, not of the mind. Slavery today is entitlement dependency.
Weaver sawed off a shotgun after an ATF agent offered him 500 dollars, entrapment. Koresh supposedly had automatic weapons. The Davidians were surrounded by the FBI, the FBI sprayed CS gas into the compound with tanks and shot off flash grenades, killing children and old people. We are tax slaves, Slavery today is taxes, cattle slavery produced 50% profit you had to feed, cloth and house slaves. Our total tax bill local, state and federal is over 60% and we have to feed our selves, Tax on food.
Randy Weaver did NOT make and sell automatic firearms. He cut off a HALF A DAMNED INCH off a shotgun barrel as an ENTRAPMENT by the government thugs. A 1/2'' metal ring, and do you think that is WRONG? Do you think they had the right to kill his wife, his son, shoot his friend, and his dog over a HALF INCH OF #*#@*$ METAL? ZERO evidence of illegal weaponry was found at Waco, though many weapons were recovered from the ashes. YOUR statements are bit of a stretch.
The government owns you because you accept to contract with them via you're social security number. You agree to represent a number and their laws ONLY CAN BE APPLIED to that number. This is the biggest part of the illusion that gives them power.
Without government, irrational business would not have squad of enforcers, so irrational business like AIG and GoldmanSachs would FAIL, as they should. It is only with sanctioned government force that cronyism can prevail. Out of the frying pan in this case does not necessarily mean into the fire. Read von Mises.
Ravengaurd6 How do you know the Fed doesn't have monetary reserves? Have you audited it? If you have I'd like to see your audit because even Congress hasn't been able to. Furthermore, if tax increases create more revenue to the government, why don't we tax everyone at 100%? 1) We don't know that the Fed has. 2) Every time tax decreases have been tried, and economic boom has ensued.
2) It's appropriate to distrust government agencies, but just remember that if you weaken the government, large banks and corporations simply step in and take more power, and they don't even have to pretend to be on your side.
If large banks and corporations would have more power without government, why have they worked tirelessly to enlarge government?
I got news for you, the banks and other big money interests are in control - and having a populace under the delusion that the very organization which feeds their power is that which restrains it is the most cost-effective way they have found to solidify their hegemony.
But by all means, keep believing the fairy tales you got from school, TV and radio.
@AwakenedWhite "If large banks and corporations would have more power without government, why have they worked tirelessly to enlarge government?"
Because they haven't. They've worked tirelessly to reduce regulations and control by the government. You have a lot more to fear from the big banks and corporations than you do from the government agencies that they control.
Hah, stop listening to the fairy tale that Limbaugh and Elanor Cliff both push and do some real research. Gabriel Kolko's book on the era of railroad trusts destroys the progressive myth taught in our schools about that era, I't's a good start.
@AwakenedWhite Are you saying we can trust large corporations and banks to watch out for our interests and take the concerns and needs of citizens and communities seriously? Ida Tarbell's book on John D Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Trust destroys the myth if the benign corporation, if there ever was such a myth to begin with.
I thought it was very clear that I was saying nothing of the sort.
The history of the leverage of power by rapacious big money interests is that the best way for them to grab the most wealth while incurring the least cost is to use government - the cost of the barriers to competition and other means of skewing things in their favor is payed by the entire taxed population, their ill-gotten gains are protected by the legal system, even wars are payed for by us for their benefit.
I understand the sentiment behind the average person's desire for less government. But I'm not sure they understand that achieving that goal would be only half the equation - Out of the frying pan. . . Cheers.
No, I don't agree. The belief that there is an overall constraint upon large sources of non-governmental power by the power of government is an error.
Big business spends tens of millions on politics so that they may leverage billions in tax dollars and reap hundreds of millions in profit. Without the power of the state the wars, the enforcement of laws against the average joe, and the credible threats for the benefit of these plutocrats would not be profitable.
@AwakenedWhite You've got it partially right. Businesses spend money in politics not only to get direct expenditures for themselves but also to reduce the power of government over their affairs - loosened environmental regs, evisceration of agencies like OSHA and CPSC, and generally less government oversight of their affairs. Right now they're spending millions to prevent or at least gut the financial reform bill written to prevent another sub-prime mortgage mess.
Surprisingly enough, many of the costly regulations are pushed by big money interests. In some cases because they can afford to run their business while abiding by them while smaller competitors can not, at other times it is a case of a business being a likely (and with the right strategy, a definite) beneficiary, for example groups which make good money buying up seized land from the state.
Often the regulation vs deregulation paradigm misses the mark - the reality is targeted regulation.
@AwakenedWhite The main reason corporation push for federal regs is because they face a myriad of state regs on a give subject and they're seeking uniformity and hoping a new but relatively weak federal reg will supercede the state regs. But in the areas of environment, consumer protection, occupational health & safety, food inspection, nuclear power plant safety, and financial reporting, they almost always lobby for less regulation, less oversight, less government.
@PoetryHound I fear them both. I promote free markets and decentralized powers. between corporatism and totalitarianism the focus of freedom is a strait between scylla and charybdis.
@Ravengaurd6 I agree. Basically, the government and private companies work hand in hand whether it's for good or evil. I'm a little more fearful of corporations. You can't file a Freedom Of Information Act request with them. They have no qualms about shipping your job to China. Their first loyalty is not to the country or citizens but to their shareholders. In fact, corporate management often even try to screw over their own shareholders. They are motivated primarily by greed.
@Ravengaurd6 Yeah, I agree governments are more direct at killing and imprisoning you and taking away your rights. Look at how state governments are trying to take away rights from women who want abortions, gays who want to get married, people who want to buy medical marijuana, & on & on. Corporations and banks don't do that.
But when it comes to stealing your money, oh corporations and banks are the masters.
@PoetryHound the fed is the greatest form of that. it's the bank that steals from the government which steals from us. so basically the state charged higher taxes to pay of it's debt plus interest thus the DEFICIT is born. money the state stole and then overspent and now it might default on our children and destroy the future.
@Ravengaurd6 The Fed sets interest rates. It doesn't have cash and doesn't steel any.
Did you know income tax rates are at a 30-year low?
Regarding the deficit, do you know what the biggest contributor to it is? Not the stimulus spending. Not increased gov't spending under Obama. Not the ME wars. The single largest contributor to the federal deficit by far is the Bush tax cuts.
@bagintree and? the deficit still exist and INCREASES as we spend regardless of how it got there. which only the fed allows. the fed loans fiat value that legitimizes increased printing of currency which boosts inflation. there should've been a better way to regulate interests (if they even need it) than to enter a system that leads the government to default on the citizenry.
Actually, we're slaves to the big banks and corporations that control the politicians and the government. They ship good-paying jobs overseas, prevent the formation of unions that fight for decent wages, and control our energy, food, medicine - almost everything we need. The gov't stands by while agribusiness adds pesticides and other poisons to our food, while coal companies destroy mountain tops, while drug companies charge exorbitant prices & conceal the effects of their drugs.
Watch the house of cards fall by exposing their every unethical, immoral aspect of their operation and you'll see that the almighty Oz is just a little ugly, frail old man with no power at all. Quit delivering their message then, provide a solution, don't tell me their plan, you might end up in hell.
Watch the house of cards fall by exposing their every unethical, immoral aspect of their operation and you'll see that the almighty Oz is just a little ugly, frail old man with no power at all.
The Federal Reserve, like any Ponzi scheme, must have new capital or it will collapse. Higher debt limit merely postpones the inherent collapse. The FRBNY handled $8.4 trillion from T-auctions last year and hid the profit from Congress. Is that embezzlement? Ref. 3W scribd dot com message 49040689 RIP OFF BY FEDERAL RESERVE
Another step towards control. Now with the Healthcare Enslavement Law they no longer even try to hide the fact that want us all to be slaves. Check out /healthcare-enslavement-law/ at Michael-E . com
Oh and you may want to abandon religion. Religion is a form of control. You're brought up to believe in a being that doesn't exist who will persecute you if you don't show faith and that religion has become a tool for manipulation. It was a tool under English rule when the King declared that he was the voice of God.
You have to be careful. Society needs a degree of structure. Its unfortunately human nature, we don't operate well independently. That said he's correct that are trying to change your thinking. Convincing you to buy products that you don't need. Especially in American media which sells fear on a daily basis. Just be critical of your judgement. I think its a shame to see so many people dumbing themselves down.
Really easy question- Since "Congress" has the power to Treaty, and they have screwed the Indians very efficiently....do you magically somehow think they would NEVER do the same to you? Have you never read a "Treatise on American Citizenship" by John S. Wise, of the Supreme Court? That EXPLICITLY says you are a BOTTOM RUNG class of "Citizens". Or the American BAR Association Journal of 1920...saying the exact same? You won't "force" anything on them, but they will on YOU, "Citizen".
When are retards going to realize that all humanity itself was and is a genetically modified organism... designed for the express purpose of SLAVERY for our creators. We are slaves, we have slaves... what do you think is the purpose of beef, chicken, horses, oxen, etc? Unless they stop making babies, they can not escape their fate and likely neither will we. Welcome to reality, pay your taxes on time and be grateful for the time you have and that you are not on the bottom of the heap!
This six minutes and nineteen second speech would take this Native nine months to get out if Bill O'Reilly were sitting next to him; I wish I were joking.
my point here is that these 'prison' 'slave' explanations never discuss alternatives.... its easy to sit back and complain all the while using facilities that have been born out of this prison... internet, clothes, education, etc etc
They will come from exactly the same place they come now. From the work of the people.
The same as roads, electricity, etc. One thing is local government (the one of the cities and states). The original purpose of the federal government was to present a common defense. It was never supossed to be our master. A series of states in competition with each other and free commerce between each other is far better for the people than a single all powerful government.
@bootr0s The federalism idea is good but it only grows the state further... so there's only one real alternative, and that is anarchy. Anarchy isn't chaos, so please keep an open mind on it. And if you feel an urge to see the alternative, go check out the stefbot channel, and if you think you just need to educate yourself about the american republic, check out my channel a little.
@josda1000 Anarchy is the stongest ruling the the weaker, but a constitutional republic the government enforcing rule of law and protecting the citizens rights. We just have to take back our republic
@fishndoc11 No, what we have right now is democracy, where 51% rule over 49% directly, or an oligarchy, which is the stronger ruling the weak / rich vs poor. I think you should look into anarchy, you really have no idea what you're talking about. But I do agree, if we went back to our original minarchy, we'd be better off than we are now.
@josda1000 If we lived in a democracy we wouldn't have had obamacare shoved down our throats when the majority didn't want it. I agree with you that we are moving toward an oligarchy with the ruling class as the professional politicians, but I disagree with anarchy. There must be rule of law for there to be comfortable civilized life so I believe that we need to move back toward the government that our founding fathers wanted. A constutional republic.
@fishndoc11 I can see you didn't do any research on anarchy, because in anarchy there is still law, just law that is created by the market as opposed to politicians, and you know that politicians don't care about law, they break it all the time and constantly lie. Please I implore you to look into freedomainradio com and stefbot's channel. And you just showed to yourself how much of an oligarchy we have, nevermind the Fed being created in 1913 when all senators weren't in the chamber.
@josda1000 I know what anarchy is, it is the absence of government and I understand that you feel that a civil law can imposed. I would love for that to be true, but history does not support that view. Whenever there is a vacuum in power someone will rush in to fill it. whether that is another country or just armed bandits doesn't matter, the only way to cobat that is a standing army, thus the government to support it.
@josda1000 I do agree with most of what you say though. We both want the same thing, less government control and more freedom. Keep up the fight and I will visit your channel from time to time to hear your views. Thanks for the discussion.
@fishndoc11 that's not what the founding fathers wanted.They're the ancestors of who we have now.It all started with the colonists.There was Europeans here long before Christofer Columbus sailed.He was financed by the wealth to control those that has left.He just wound up south of U.S.Any War from medieval times to now no wealthy person was ever attacked.it even goes further back than the mideaval times.The constitution only applies to those of the families who signed it.
@rkc010 The constution was written to attempt to prevent government abuse of power and it aplies to the government of the United States. Have you read it? It lays out federal powers very explicitly and in the 10th amendment it says anything not in the constution is reserved for the states and the people. It is just that no one is holding our government accountable to the constution.
@fishndoc11 It's the same as politicians today.They tell you what you want to hear,then they do the opposite.Finding fathers was no different.during the revolution just like any war since and before none of the rich even come close to the combat.each genral send their troops far away.they tried to make people believe they owned the land,and they also forced religion and put fear into the people on those who didn't want to get into their system.witches and native americans and others were killed.
@rkc010 It doesn't matter what anyone thinks of the authors. I am saying that we have a document that the politicians have sworn to uphold that limits their power. Now we the people just need to enforce it. Nothing else matters other than us being able to control our government. Power is like a drug once they have it they won't give it up easily and they have it now. So how do we take it back? Force them to uphold their oath to the constitution.
@laistecadal But its my understanding that part of the tax is used to build public facilities... ie roads, power grid, state schools etc.... if there was to be no tax, where would funding for these services come from?
all these types of videos never explain what it MEANS to be free? What would day to day life be like? would we still have science? medicine? all the positive advancements that have sprung out of this 'prison'. Would we be hunter gatherers? Scraping hard life from the land? These explanations are always focused on the negative and thus in my eyes lack meaning.
Speak brother, everybody better take heed to what the man is saying, u can play if u want too, time is going by and everbody is so non chalont? I just heard CPS is child molesters, selling the children off, taking kids, breaking up familes, making up lies, then maing parents jump through hoops so other agaencies can get paid, and make U pay support while they have ur children? This shit is serious, I am flabbergusted at what I've learned about US!
well said but next time leave out the evolution part. our freedom and rights are given by our creator not Govt.
hbtrux 1 week ago
@hbtrux You're full of shit.
Wasonobe 3 days ago
Sadly he mentions, millions of years of evolution for the wolf. This modern day myth of millions of years of evolution flies in the face of his plea for freedom. Darwinism is an enemy to freedom. It's formed the basis of all modern fascist and communists states.
coptnus 2 weeks ago
@coptnus You're full of shit.
Wasonobe 3 days ago
@coptnus Religion is a form of slavery Evolution has nothing to do with slaver it in fact is natures way not to be bond by fake rules that only exist in the minds of the weak minded man.
40scars 23 hours ago
Anyone else think he looks like Steven Seagal !
iluvmusicqwe 3 weeks ago 2
Who is this guy? He's right on the mark!
celtichorsetrainer 3 weeks ago
THUMB UP IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHO THIS SPEAKER IS AND WHAT SHOW THIS IS!
mrredhatter 3 weeks ago 7
laughing man???
AmenSaw 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who is this unknown person?
He sits motionless during the entire video except to make one very odd hand movement, why the Masonic hand gesture during this seemingly informative speech?
This video is made to look like it was from a movie that was produced by the late Aaron Russo - Mad As Hell, It is not!
"The table is tilted the game is rigged"...George Carlin
What is the producer of this video really trying to tell us?
Is he telling us that if we step out of line we will be killed..
fear yet?
scottkrs 1 month ago
Comment removed
scottkrs 1 month ago
Im on the fence between taking this seriously or laughing it off for fear of outside ridicule. Someone convince me.
MisterWordman 1 month ago
its comical to me how people respond to this. they go along with their daily routine slightly pondering their life expectancy here. If over 20 percent of americans stopped working and stopped using the system and learned how to make their own damn food, the system would break and everything would snap into place, with opposing violence of course. this aint going to go down peacefully you poor hippies you had better take some shooting lessons
THErickuss 1 month ago 2
requirements for slavery:
1.lose your memory
2.become domesticated be forced into a fema camp aka a city
3.be stripped of your pineal gland capabilities. no more magic, technology, or calling on the spirit world
4.become reprogrammed through schooling, religion, government and media
5.be forced to use money and become a citizen(slave) who gets taxed into debt
6. be taught that there's no such things as aliens living amongst us already who are responsible for this whole scam,
insanebeatjunkie 1 month ago
you are a slave to your own ignorance, white ppl where brought here by aliens from saturn. black ppl where killed off and their children was kidnapped all of us humans where forced to live in a city. whites are more easily to control so thats why whites are used as direct puppets to control everyone else.our pineal glands where turned off so we cant use magic and protect ourselves this is mans true slavery.....he does not know who he truly is
insanebeatjunkie 1 month ago
I bet this guy votes for Ron Paul!!!!
riffjiff 1 month ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
there is 350,000,000 (three hundred fifty million) United States citizens, that includes everyone man, woman and child. Now we owe 15 trillion, If you take 15 trillion and divide it by 350 million you get 42,857. That's what every body owes each. That's not including interest or the further debt that the government continues to spend every day. That means we are slaves. Put it this way at a 50% tax rate if you work 10 days 5 days of that goes to the government. SLAVERY
danielcooper1000 1 month ago
great video & he's not only smart, but amazingly HOT!
nanina112 1 month ago
frankly my dear, i dont give a damn
RayWilliamJohansen 1 month ago
What show is that?
mrredhatter 1 month ago
i clicked on it cuz i though he he was indian......is he indian(ummm...native american)
jkeetle1aka1jk 2 months ago
These kikes sure are getting desperate to educate and play the hero now that millions have discovered slavery, which was abolished by white christians, was a jewish institution and still is.
oveid 2 months ago
You are slave to your Ego, Everybody is programmed to be egotistical, it appears in high profile people (actors, leaders, musicians, rappers). Feed your mind to open your third eye (pineal gland). Welcome in the Truth that succeeds all moralities and endvenours, the feeble choir sing of redemption through tactics. But who is the real enemy? Your ego betrays your own morality. You must reprogram your whole persona to be humane. Everything contradicts itself to divide you into two sides...
DroidEOD 2 months ago
@DroidEOD every planet has one race only so everyone on the face of this earth has been kidnapped and brought here by an alien race, no one knows who the original man of this planet but we do know he's brown so in reality we are all slaves
insanebeatjunkie 1 month ago
@DroidEOD these same aliens have us under slavery they make everything dumbed down for us so we can put it together like leggos, but none of us have the ability to create technology, not even the educated, without your pineal gland its a loosing battle.aliens are weak frail nerds who use telekenesis and quantum physics to controll us its their ego that is the problem not ours we are victims
insanebeatjunkie 1 month ago
truth is truth...period
TheXube 2 months ago
why do these people alwyas so "you are subject to this" YOU the people YOU this and YOU that hicks did it carlin did it this guys doing it ,maxwell does it icke does it tsarion does it ,they mention "WE" about once or twice aginst the multiple times they talk to YOU ....hmmm mabye its just me
reksub10 2 months ago
@reksub10 i will say in his defence though that he is speaking to an audience and he looks like he could be aborigional indian of the land therefore knows the history of his people and what white europeans and european migrants that stole all his and many others birthrights.....
reksub10 2 months ago
to rebel against tyrany is to obey god!
roninhall1970 2 months ago
@roninhall1970 yes rebellion over revolution anyday ..well said friend ,cos when you do a 360 in a revolution then youre bacxk where you started ,that is why the states ,after their revolution are now back in british rule under roman law upholding zionist agendas...or so ive been told ,but it adds up peace
reksub10 2 months ago
This is John Trudell. Slavery.
StratusBlue 3 months ago
youtube.com/watch?v=rEW2AyXnYfc&feature=related
A must see
JonathanDoughTube 3 months ago
Slavery exists in America today. They're called illegals. Undocumented Mexicans. They work for less than minimum wage, and California's very economy depends on them.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle Yes, someone risking their life and their freedom to work for a wage that they agree to is slavery. Don't belittle the word slavery.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe I didn't. Nobody can agree to a wage below the minimum wage. That's illegal. Pedro's getting it in the ass.
Don't belittle the Mexicans who are keeping the US alive by refusing to recognize them as the wage slaves they are.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle You sound ridiculous, "Nobody can agree to a wage below the minimum wage. That's illegal." Then why do they do it? Why do the sneak across the border, risking getting lost in the desert or captured by border patrol, to get a job in the U.S.? If they don't value the wage more than their time and risk getting here, why would they show up to work? Do the employers send out armed mercenaries to collect them every morning?
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe Actually a lot of them have realized the American Dream is over and they're now starting to head back to Mexico. Who will pick the fruit now?
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle Yeah, I've heard that too. It's just more evidence that this socialist paradise is falling apart just like every other one.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe It's the deregulated capitalist part of it that caused the problem. Took a long time. Clinton removed the key protective rules. Dubya let enforcement of what was left slide. Unchecked greed took over. All the money went to those who saw it for the taking. Now there's none left in the actual economy for anyone's use. Capitalism as you know it died once the term "too big to fail" entered the lexicon.
Turns out the invisible hand doesn't exist.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle Well, I'll agree with one thing you said, and that's capitalism died when we accepted the idea of "too big to fail". But it was far from capitalism run a muck that caused this problem. The problem was a lack of capitalism, too much government meddling in the economy. People are greedy, but as much as they want more money, they don't want to loose the money they have. So, risk regulates greed. The problem is too many government guarantees and mandates.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe Risk only regulates greed if risk is undertaken by the greedy. Once financial laws are broken by the greedy, or when asymmetry of information is used by the greedy to its advantage, the risk is transferred to the counter party of the transaction.
The cause of the problem is actually the reverse of what you suggested. It's not government meddling in the economy; it's corporations buying governments.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle Financial regulation and guarantees shift the risk from the greedy to the public. Asymmetry of information ALWAYS exists. No two people know the same things.
The cause is similar to the chicken or the egg argument. Whether it's government selling special privileges or banks buying them is irrelevant. The problem is the government has the power to grant them. If we take away government's ability to print money and force us to do things, none of this moral hazard is possible.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe I don't understand the first sentence of your reply. How do financial regulation and "guarantees" (define?) shift risk from the "greedy to the public"? (You're conversing with someone who has a degree in economics and and MBA, and who worked in the banking and investments businesses for 20 years, spending significant time in regulation on both the investment sales and industry oversight sides, so consider your answer very carefully.)
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle I can explain by example: The FDIC makes people not care what their banks do with their deposits, because who cares if they go tits up? The government will print the money and bail them out. Glass-Steagall was intended to counter act the damage done by the FDIC. By limiting what kinds of risky things deposit banks could do and separating out investment banks and deposit banks this helped suppress the moral hazard created by the FDIC. Without the FDIC banks would compete for security.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe I see what you're saying, but FDIC isn't regulation; it's insurance. Is that the guarantee you meant? FDIC reduces depositor risk. It is risk-neutral and sales positive for banks by encouraging deposits. It doesn't change a bank's investment and lending policy. It protects depositors from bank insolvency. In the event of a bank's insolvency, depositors' funds would be repaid to a defined limit by insurance premiums collected from banks-no printing of money required.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle It's not insurance because the issuer of the "insurance policy" is funded by taxes. The premiums aren't risk based, they are politically based. If the the insurance policy was issued by a private company that was trying to make a profit and couldn't steal from people like th government you'd be totally right. I didn't say that the FDIC required money printing, but it does facilitate inflation by supporting the fractional reserve system.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe If the FDIC is at all taxpayer funded, then it's a fraud, ergo all economically grounded arguments about regulatory risk concerning it go out the window. That's a shame. Here in Canada, when it comes to overseeing financial institutions and their ancillary insurance corporations, we lead the world by example. Our CDIC is properly funded.
Regulation has rarely if ever been done properly in the US, so I understand your views. Ken Lay (Enron) actually handpicked his own regulators.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle We'll see whether the CDIC is properly funded or not when Canadian banks that hold U.S. securities go bankrupt. If the CDIC goes bankrupt and it gets bailed out by the Bank of Canada or the Canadian government, then it is obviously not properly funded. Also, if paying premiums to the CDIC is required to be a bank in Canada, then it is not properly funded. A free market works only when people/companies can look out for their own best interests.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe Now you're talking through your hat.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle I'm not familiar with that idiom.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe So educate yourself.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle What part of what I said didn't make any sense? Just declaring that I don't know what I'm talking about doesn't cut it.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe Canadian bank holdings of US assets aren't sufficiently material to bring them down.
"if paying premiums to the CDIC is required to be a bank in Canada, then it is not properly funded." Participation in CDIC isn't mandatory. But if it was, why would it be improper? All motorists are required to carry some form of insurance for damages to other parties, aren't they?
Are you saying that a free market stops working if a central body looks out for peoples' interests on their behalf?
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle We'll see whether Canadian banks are holding enough U.S. securities to bring them down or not. I'm willing to bet a number of them are.
If you're required to pay dues to an insurance company, what motive does the company have to make sure they are providing a valuable service. They could do absolutely nothing for you and make a good profit. Motor vehicle insurance is a good example of a failing insurance market. The answer to your last question is a resounding YES.
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
@ArmednSafe Insurance coverage IS the value of the service. So what if they profit without payout?
A resounding yes? I can ask anyone to provide any service for me, including protecting me from risks presented by others. How exactly does that harm a market?
Besides, with the number of products and companies that demand personal due diligence of us, there's no possible way anyone can adequately protect themselves from all risks presented. In present day, a true free market is a fairy tale.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago
@ChipArgyle My point is that if you don't have a choice whether to give them money or not, they have no incentive to look after something for you. You certainly have the right to delegate a responsibility to someone else but if you are forced to then you are no longer looking out for yourself.
I like to use the example of heart surgeons. If you need hear surgery you're going to go to a reputable hospital to find a surgeon, you won't interview them yourself (even though you have the right to).
ArmednSafe 3 months ago
Does anybody know the name of the guy who gave this speech?
RedX351 3 months ago
Wow. (ñ.ñ)
ratonL 3 months ago
i really enjoyed the comentary about the wolf, my heart sank in my chest, it makes me sad to think of the tyranny that is perpetually weakening the spirit of all things in the world. the world could be such a beautiful and wonderous place. tragic.
MrChappie1971 3 months ago
Freedom has been an illusion for a very long time
RogueLes 3 months ago
anyone know this guys name?
shady2084 3 months ago
@shady2084 Another one
lightsoljer 3 months ago
@lightsoljer ???
shady2084 3 months ago
overpopulation
MrFalconford 3 months ago
What's the speaker's name?
He's good.
RealLiveDebates 3 months ago 4
@RealLiveDebates I've asked that same question a few times now?
0407Anonymous 2 months ago in playlist Freedom
check out a channel called Stefbot
ykui1 3 months ago 28
This is true of them, and they tell the rest of us that this is true of us! Lies! Most of us - THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF US - are good people, but since the psychopaths have the willingness to deceive us without having any guilt about it, we have been mislead into believing the. The truth is that they are talking about themselves when they say that humanity is evil. They are evil, and the love to position themselves in jobs where they can promote their evil. Don't believe them!
raeliera 4 months ago
Regarding slavery - "It has been with us since the beginning of time on every continent and virtually every culture. . . " I gotta take exception to this statement. I agree that we are wage slaves to the International Bankers. I do not agree that the desire to enslave another is a characteristic of humanity. Humans are by and large - the overwhelming majority of them! - are good and kind and real and tolerant! It is only the psychopathic/sociopathic minority that wages war!
raeliera 4 months ago
58 people enjoy their slavery.
TheDaddyandTheBaby 4 months ago
Fuck this guy. Unchecked corporate power is the real problem we face today.
JuanDeSoCal 4 months ago
Sorry, but paying taxes and "the government" isn't the problem. The corporations OWN the government, and THAT is the problem.
JuanDeSoCal 4 months ago
@JuanDeSoCal Well, you're simply saying that corporations are now the government.
The government is only a bunch of individuals who control a monopoly on violence and who uses this monopoly to get richer and more powerful. It doesn't really matter if that monopoly is held by an unelected clan, or some elected officials or some corporations. You can achieve the same awful results in each of those cases. The State is the problem it is the enemy of freedom, peace and prosperity for the honest man.
kevinz1985 3 months ago
@JuanDeSoCal Who gave the governments their power? Why do Corporations lobby the government? Why don't they do the things they lobby for themselves? Do you want to know why? The government is the base of power and as long there is a base of power that people can lobby to create laws and violate rights. It's the government that is the problem because without the government there would be no corporations. No laws that violate your rights and freedoms.
MarketAn101 3 months ago
@MarketAn101
I disagree. The government has the potential of being open to democratic action. That's exactly why it is constantly demonized by corporate power, and is constantly lobbied to by the corporations. Corporate power is not open to democratic action; they are private tyrannies, the fiefdoms of the modern world.
JuanDeSoCal 3 months ago
@JuanDeSoCal The government has the potential to be open up to powermongers, looters and tyrannical good-intentions. Democratic action is by definition mob rule.. where the majority can take from the minority at every en passe. It's because the government is the base of power that people lobby it. Corporate power is actually open to democratic action.. it's called shareholders... Btw, corporations get their power from the government.
MarketAn101 3 months ago
Magic Mushrooms dissolve ALL cultural illusions, including this guys speech, witness true rebirth.
SilentDarkness2332 4 months ago
"money is the material source of your freedom" Uh, no. While it may be true to say "money is the source of your material freedom" it doesn't work the other way around.
I agree with most of this otherwise, though without mention and explanation of the problem of the Corporation this speech seems lopsided, myopic. The true enemy of all mankind is Autocracy, is arbitrary beaurocracy acting without consent of those it affects. Until one day we can act cooperatively, we will never be free.
Keinlicht 4 months ago
yea ive been saying were slaves to our government for the last 20 some years of my life now and im 27! fuck the goddamn government!
yamahabansheerider 4 months ago
evolution isnt real
TheBee7943 4 months ago
@TheBee7943 Fool.
danieljliversLXXXIX 4 months ago
Don't open your eyes take it for me I have you can find happiness in slavery
joey4245 5 months ago
The government issues the currency, they want you to be locked into this system of control. It's NOT about controlling you through taxes. Taxes are not an invasion of your rights. That's a mild irritant... they want to control you through the money itself.
flyinggimpproduction 5 months ago
ASK YOURSELF....why can this guy say this and his youtube is still up? Ask yourself why my channel about horses and the gift of life has been impossible for me to get back into. Ask yourself something, before you "like" this or put it up on your youtube...etc.....because, now they are tracking YOU by WHAT you are LIKING....so, it s a great message, and I couldn't agree more...but when "
THEY: put their last move ON...they already KNOW WHO YOU ARE because you liked it...
placeksue 5 months ago
@placeksue wtf?
xMasterJuiceX 4 months ago
@xMasterJuiceX I think placeksue might be a disinfo agent, they come to these vids and babble looney nonsense.
randy0987 3 months ago
@placeksue Jesus dude don't you realize that they don't have to be that controlling? The western system of politicoeconomic propaganda is so effective that videos like this can stay up. You want to know why?
Because the politicians, the capitalists and those who the sentiment in this video would seen overthrown know they're not in danger. They have enough of us hooked to tv and distracted in our personal lives that they know we'll never unite. It's going to take a lot to awaken America.
Keinlicht 4 months ago 2
@Keinlicht no question, and its not just America that needs to be awakened, it seems to be a global issue.
randy0987 3 months ago
@randy0987 At this time in Human history, our survival is determined on a global basis.
We face the most awesome challenges that have ever confronted our race, the very fact that this planet is not yet an irradiated waste is no small miracle.. If we are to unite, to overcome our propensity to create social strata, to identify ourselves by skin colour, social class, or sexuality, we must do so on a scale never before imagined.
I hope this day comes soon, the clock is ticking for our species.
Keinlicht 3 months ago
I suppose people who believe supporting the government is enslavement would prefer to be owned by the corporations they work for, where they have no choices in terms of goods but what the corporation provides? Where they would have to begin working at age 6? Clearly, history has not been learned.
langwiz7 5 months ago
@langwiz7 there are 4 classes
The Ruling Class : The elitists, the central bankers, govt, big corp The Brutality Class: Police, courts, military The Propaganda Class: News, media, entertainment, comedians, intellectuals, scientists, religious ideologists The Slave Class: blue and white collar workers, small business owners, welfare recipients
The alternative is to go into the wilderness with supplies and start over..there is a choice (watch for the brutality class, though)
jeffthecoder 5 months ago
@jeffthecoder Are you an Anarchist?
Keinlicht 4 months ago
Randey Weaver made and sold automatic firearms, while I don't have a problem with it, the laws at that time did. David Koresh purchased automatic firearms and had a stockpile of explosives, grenades, and other military grade weapons. So saying they had not done anything wrong is a bit of a stretch. As for slavery, we are slaves only if we allow ourselves to be considered so. Slavery in the modern day is in the mind, not of the mind. Slavery today is entitlement dependency.
PictishPrince 5 months ago
Weaver sawed off a shotgun after an ATF agent offered him 500 dollars, entrapment. Koresh supposedly had automatic weapons. The Davidians were surrounded by the FBI, the FBI sprayed CS gas into the compound with tanks and shot off flash grenades, killing children and old people. We are tax slaves, Slavery today is taxes, cattle slavery produced 50% profit you had to feed, cloth and house slaves. Our total tax bill local, state and federal is over 60% and we have to feed our selves, Tax on food.
brainerdrebel 5 months ago
@PictishPrince
Randy Weaver did NOT make and sell automatic firearms. He cut off a HALF A DAMNED INCH off a shotgun barrel as an ENTRAPMENT by the government thugs. A 1/2'' metal ring, and do you think that is WRONG? Do you think they had the right to kill his wife, his son, shoot his friend, and his dog over a HALF INCH OF #*#@*$ METAL? ZERO evidence of illegal weaponry was found at Waco, though many weapons were recovered from the ashes. YOUR statements are bit of a stretch.
SansAuthoritas 3 months ago
Fuck the government im not going to let those cunts control me as long as im breathing.
OnTheGrind91 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BOYCOTT TUCSON AZ THEY KILLED MY DOG SUKI ON 1/5/2011
R.I.P. SUKI , WE MISS AND LOVE YOU!!
pimakilledsuki 5 months ago
Hey boys, let's take America back before the government strips our right to have weapons!
Tomekwinxs 5 months ago
The government owns you because you accept to contract with them via you're social security number. You agree to represent a number and their laws ONLY CAN BE APPLIED to that number. This is the biggest part of the illusion that gives them power.
Jayn0o 6 months ago
What's this guy's name?
sgthobbes2 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RIGHT ON!!! Also, check this out:
youtube.com/watch?v=8TZ36GoC4Rk
dennyritner 6 months ago
speaking of tool
hikermanwa 6 months ago
Your name has a number. You are number to them. It has a value on the Stock Exchange. Your home, car, town, State all have numbers.
wikkid61 6 months ago
Without government, irrational business would not have squad of enforcers, so irrational business like AIG and GoldmanSachs would FAIL, as they should. It is only with sanctioned government force that cronyism can prevail. Out of the frying pan in this case does not necessarily mean into the fire. Read von Mises.
ericevans93 6 months ago
Ravengaurd6 How do you know the Fed doesn't have monetary reserves? Have you audited it? If you have I'd like to see your audit because even Congress hasn't been able to. Furthermore, if tax increases create more revenue to the government, why don't we tax everyone at 100%? 1) We don't know that the Fed has. 2) Every time tax decreases have been tried, and economic boom has ensued.
ericevans93 6 months ago
Long live freedom power to the people thank's for posting this great speech.
dan32749 6 months ago
Comment removed
TheArea510 6 months ago
2) It's appropriate to distrust government agencies, but just remember that if you weaken the government, large banks and corporations simply step in and take more power, and they don't even have to pretend to be on your side.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PoetryHound
If large banks and corporations would have more power without government, why have they worked tirelessly to enlarge government?
I got news for you, the banks and other big money interests are in control - and having a populace under the delusion that the very organization which feeds their power is that which restrains it is the most cost-effective way they have found to solidify their hegemony.
But by all means, keep believing the fairy tales you got from school, TV and radio.
AwakenedWhite 6 months ago
@AwakenedWhite "If large banks and corporations would have more power without government, why have they worked tirelessly to enlarge government?"
Because they haven't. They've worked tirelessly to reduce regulations and control by the government. You have a lot more to fear from the big banks and corporations than you do from the government agencies that they control.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PoetryHound
Hah, stop listening to the fairy tale that Limbaugh and Elanor Cliff both push and do some real research. Gabriel Kolko's book on the era of railroad trusts destroys the progressive myth taught in our schools about that era, I't's a good start.
AwakenedWhite 6 months ago
also, see the video series of a Noam Chomsky lecture "free market fantasies"
AwakenedWhite 6 months ago
@AwakenedWhite Are you saying we can trust large corporations and banks to watch out for our interests and take the concerns and needs of citizens and communities seriously? Ida Tarbell's book on John D Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Trust destroys the myth if the benign corporation, if there ever was such a myth to begin with.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PoetryHound
I thought it was very clear that I was saying nothing of the sort.
The history of the leverage of power by rapacious big money interests is that the best way for them to grab the most wealth while incurring the least cost is to use government - the cost of the barriers to competition and other means of skewing things in their favor is payed by the entire taxed population, their ill-gotten gains are protected by the legal system, even wars are payed for by us for their benefit.
AwakenedWhite 6 months ago
@AwakenedWhite Okay, it's clear now. You agree.
I understand the sentiment behind the average person's desire for less government. But I'm not sure they understand that achieving that goal would be only half the equation - Out of the frying pan. . . Cheers.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PoetryHound
No, I don't agree. The belief that there is an overall constraint upon large sources of non-governmental power by the power of government is an error.
Big business spends tens of millions on politics so that they may leverage billions in tax dollars and reap hundreds of millions in profit. Without the power of the state the wars, the enforcement of laws against the average joe, and the credible threats for the benefit of these plutocrats would not be profitable.
AwakenedWhite 6 months ago
@AwakenedWhite You've got it partially right. Businesses spend money in politics not only to get direct expenditures for themselves but also to reduce the power of government over their affairs - loosened environmental regs, evisceration of agencies like OSHA and CPSC, and generally less government oversight of their affairs. Right now they're spending millions to prevent or at least gut the financial reform bill written to prevent another sub-prime mortgage mess.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PH
Surprisingly enough, many of the costly regulations are pushed by big money interests. In some cases because they can afford to run their business while abiding by them while smaller competitors can not, at other times it is a case of a business being a likely (and with the right strategy, a definite) beneficiary, for example groups which make good money buying up seized land from the state.
Often the regulation vs deregulation paradigm misses the mark - the reality is targeted regulation.
AwakenedWhite 6 months ago
@AwakenedWhite The main reason corporation push for federal regs is because they face a myriad of state regs on a give subject and they're seeking uniformity and hoping a new but relatively weak federal reg will supercede the state regs. But in the areas of environment, consumer protection, occupational health & safety, food inspection, nuclear power plant safety, and financial reporting, they almost always lobby for less regulation, less oversight, less government.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PoetryHound I fear them both. I promote free markets and decentralized powers. between corporatism and totalitarianism the focus of freedom is a strait between scylla and charybdis.
Ravengaurd6 6 months ago
@Ravengaurd6 I agree. Basically, the government and private companies work hand in hand whether it's for good or evil. I'm a little more fearful of corporations. You can't file a Freedom Of Information Act request with them. They have no qualms about shipping your job to China. Their first loyalty is not to the country or citizens but to their shareholders. In fact, corporate management often even try to screw over their own shareholders. They are motivated primarily by greed.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PoetryHound I fear governments more. they are more direct when it comes to killing and imprisoning you and stealing your money.
on the one hand coercion in the other fraud. optimizing is going to be a hell of a job.
Ravengaurd6 6 months ago
@Ravengaurd6 Yeah, I agree governments are more direct at killing and imprisoning you and taking away your rights. Look at how state governments are trying to take away rights from women who want abortions, gays who want to get married, people who want to buy medical marijuana, & on & on. Corporations and banks don't do that.
But when it comes to stealing your money, oh corporations and banks are the masters.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
@PoetryHound the fed is the greatest form of that. it's the bank that steals from the government which steals from us. so basically the state charged higher taxes to pay of it's debt plus interest thus the DEFICIT is born. money the state stole and then overspent and now it might default on our children and destroy the future.
Ravengaurd6 6 months ago
@Ravengaurd6 The Fed sets interest rates. It doesn't have cash and doesn't steel any.
Did you know income tax rates are at a 30-year low?
Regarding the deficit, do you know what the biggest contributor to it is? Not the stimulus spending. Not increased gov't spending under Obama. Not the ME wars. The single largest contributor to the federal deficit by far is the Bush tax cuts.
bagintree 6 months ago
@bagintree and? the deficit still exist and INCREASES as we spend regardless of how it got there. which only the fed allows. the fed loans fiat value that legitimizes increased printing of currency which boosts inflation. there should've been a better way to regulate interests (if they even need it) than to enter a system that leads the government to default on the citizenry.
Ravengaurd6 6 months ago
Actually, we're slaves to the big banks and corporations that control the politicians and the government. They ship good-paying jobs overseas, prevent the formation of unions that fight for decent wages, and control our energy, food, medicine - almost everything we need. The gov't stands by while agribusiness adds pesticides and other poisons to our food, while coal companies destroy mountain tops, while drug companies charge exorbitant prices & conceal the effects of their drugs.
PoetryHound 6 months ago
Watch the house of cards fall by exposing their every unethical, immoral aspect of their operation and you'll see that the almighty Oz is just a little ugly, frail old man with no power at all. Quit delivering their message then, provide a solution, don't tell me their plan, you might end up in hell.
anewgift4u 6 months ago
Watch the house of cards fall by exposing their every unethical, immoral aspect of their operation and you'll see that the almighty Oz is just a little ugly, frail old man with no power at all.
anewgift4u 6 months ago
Who is this man? Sounds like some actor, reading a script.
Quex01 7 months ago
The Federal Reserve, like any Ponzi scheme, must have new capital or it will collapse. Higher debt limit merely postpones the inherent collapse. The FRBNY handled $8.4 trillion from T-auctions last year and hid the profit from Congress. Is that embezzlement? Ref. 3W scribd dot com message 49040689 RIP OFF BY FEDERAL RESERVE
oldereb38 7 months ago
Another step towards control. Now with the Healthcare Enslavement Law they no longer even try to hide the fact that want us all to be slaves. Check out /healthcare-enslavement-law/ at Michael-E . com
takethatreid 7 months ago
THIS GUY IS SPOT ON
TheDoomsdayperson 7 months ago
why say its human nature to enslave others?- thats excluding & censoring the native matriarchy societies
lmollot 7 months ago
Yay Marxism!
HoorayforOranges 7 months ago
Oh and you may want to abandon religion. Religion is a form of control. You're brought up to believe in a being that doesn't exist who will persecute you if you don't show faith and that religion has become a tool for manipulation. It was a tool under English rule when the King declared that he was the voice of God.
giddeo 8 months ago
@giddeo Careful on your wording. Religion isn't "intrinsically" a form of control but it has been used as one.
HoorayforOranges 7 months ago
@HoorayforOranges I have to agree with you on that point.
willywillyization 7 months ago
You have to be careful. Society needs a degree of structure. Its unfortunately human nature, we don't operate well independently. That said he's correct that are trying to change your thinking. Convincing you to buy products that you don't need. Especially in American media which sells fear on a daily basis. Just be critical of your judgement. I think its a shame to see so many people dumbing themselves down.
giddeo 8 months ago
AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE
LoveVanillaRose 8 months ago 9
Really easy question- Since "Congress" has the power to Treaty, and they have screwed the Indians very efficiently....do you magically somehow think they would NEVER do the same to you? Have you never read a "Treatise on American Citizenship" by John S. Wise, of the Supreme Court? That EXPLICITLY says you are a BOTTOM RUNG class of "Citizens". Or the American BAR Association Journal of 1920...saying the exact same? You won't "force" anything on them, but they will on YOU, "Citizen".
TheCaptainSlappy 8 months ago
When are retards going to realize that all humanity itself was and is a genetically modified organism... designed for the express purpose of SLAVERY for our creators. We are slaves, we have slaves... what do you think is the purpose of beef, chicken, horses, oxen, etc? Unless they stop making babies, they can not escape their fate and likely neither will we. Welcome to reality, pay your taxes on time and be grateful for the time you have and that you are not on the bottom of the heap!
RalfUriah 8 months ago
This six minutes and nineteen second speech would take this Native nine months to get out if Bill O'Reilly were sitting next to him; I wish I were joking.
heat45jc 8 months ago
What program is this from????
floyspudz 8 months ago
Who is the speaker?
Karbouchard 8 months ago
my point here is that these 'prison' 'slave' explanations never discuss alternatives.... its easy to sit back and complain all the while using facilities that have been born out of this prison... internet, clothes, education, etc etc
bootr0s 8 months ago
@bootr0s
They will come from exactly the same place they come now. From the work of the people.
The same as roads, electricity, etc. One thing is local government (the one of the cities and states). The original purpose of the federal government was to present a common defense. It was never supossed to be our master. A series of states in competition with each other and free commerce between each other is far better for the people than a single all powerful government.
xanatose 8 months ago
@bootr0s The federalism idea is good but it only grows the state further... so there's only one real alternative, and that is anarchy. Anarchy isn't chaos, so please keep an open mind on it. And if you feel an urge to see the alternative, go check out the stefbot channel, and if you think you just need to educate yourself about the american republic, check out my channel a little.
josda1000 8 months ago
@josda1000 Anarchy is the stongest ruling the the weaker, but a constitutional republic the government enforcing rule of law and protecting the citizens rights. We just have to take back our republic
fishndoc11 8 months ago
@fishndoc11 No, what we have right now is democracy, where 51% rule over 49% directly, or an oligarchy, which is the stronger ruling the weak / rich vs poor. I think you should look into anarchy, you really have no idea what you're talking about. But I do agree, if we went back to our original minarchy, we'd be better off than we are now.
josda1000 8 months ago
@josda1000 If we lived in a democracy we wouldn't have had obamacare shoved down our throats when the majority didn't want it. I agree with you that we are moving toward an oligarchy with the ruling class as the professional politicians, but I disagree with anarchy. There must be rule of law for there to be comfortable civilized life so I believe that we need to move back toward the government that our founding fathers wanted. A constutional republic.
fishndoc11 8 months ago
@fishndoc11 I can see you didn't do any research on anarchy, because in anarchy there is still law, just law that is created by the market as opposed to politicians, and you know that politicians don't care about law, they break it all the time and constantly lie. Please I implore you to look into freedomainradio com and stefbot's channel. And you just showed to yourself how much of an oligarchy we have, nevermind the Fed being created in 1913 when all senators weren't in the chamber.
josda1000 8 months ago
@josda1000 I know what anarchy is, it is the absence of government and I understand that you feel that a civil law can imposed. I would love for that to be true, but history does not support that view. Whenever there is a vacuum in power someone will rush in to fill it. whether that is another country or just armed bandits doesn't matter, the only way to cobat that is a standing army, thus the government to support it.
fishndoc11 8 months ago
@josda1000 I do agree with most of what you say though. We both want the same thing, less government control and more freedom. Keep up the fight and I will visit your channel from time to time to hear your views. Thanks for the discussion.
fishndoc11 8 months ago
@fishndoc11 that's not what the founding fathers wanted.They're the ancestors of who we have now.It all started with the colonists.There was Europeans here long before Christofer Columbus sailed.He was financed by the wealth to control those that has left.He just wound up south of U.S.Any War from medieval times to now no wealthy person was ever attacked.it even goes further back than the mideaval times.The constitution only applies to those of the families who signed it.
rkc010 8 months ago
@rkc010 The constution was written to attempt to prevent government abuse of power and it aplies to the government of the United States. Have you read it? It lays out federal powers very explicitly and in the 10th amendment it says anything not in the constution is reserved for the states and the people. It is just that no one is holding our government accountable to the constution.
fishndoc11 8 months ago
@fishndoc11 It's the same as politicians today.They tell you what you want to hear,then they do the opposite.Finding fathers was no different.during the revolution just like any war since and before none of the rich even come close to the combat.each genral send their troops far away.they tried to make people believe they owned the land,and they also forced religion and put fear into the people on those who didn't want to get into their system.witches and native americans and others were killed.
rkc010 8 months ago
@rkc010 It doesn't matter what anyone thinks of the authors. I am saying that we have a document that the politicians have sworn to uphold that limits their power. Now we the people just need to enforce it. Nothing else matters other than us being able to control our government. Power is like a drug once they have it they won't give it up easily and they have it now. So how do we take it back? Force them to uphold their oath to the constitution.
fishndoc11 8 months ago
@laistecadal But its my understanding that part of the tax is used to build public facilities... ie roads, power grid, state schools etc.... if there was to be no tax, where would funding for these services come from?
bootr0s 8 months ago
all these types of videos never explain what it MEANS to be free? What would day to day life be like? would we still have science? medicine? all the positive advancements that have sprung out of this 'prison'. Would we be hunter gatherers? Scraping hard life from the land? These explanations are always focused on the negative and thus in my eyes lack meaning.
bootr0s 8 months ago
Comment removed
bootr0s 8 months ago
I love your spirit of Freedom, dear Mohawk....I was your neighbour for a while in NY....
CombatForTheFaith 8 months ago
See: "Republic of Missouri, the Change our Founders believed in" on YT ... ASAP!
1tonykirk 8 months ago
www
yarbi1 8 months ago
Great job, dont forget Bill Cooper as well...
yarbi1 8 months ago
What are we waiting for to begin the revolution?
joseg1787 8 months ago
They don't give a fuck about you. They don't give a fuck about you. THEY DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU. At all. At all. At all.
RIP George and Bill. We need you now more than ever.
abluecommunist 9 months ago
We've met the enemy....Its us.
JimmyGunXD556 9 months ago
WAKE THE HELL UP AMERICA! --- Join the Revolution
-
Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( revolution2.osixs.org )
-
We don’t have to live like this anymore. "Spread the News"
MorpheusX001 9 months ago
Speak brother, everybody better take heed to what the man is saying, u can play if u want too, time is going by and everbody is so non chalont? I just heard CPS is child molesters, selling the children off, taking kids, breaking up familes, making up lies, then maing parents jump through hoops so other agaencies can get paid, and make U pay support while they have ur children? This shit is serious, I am flabbergusted at what I've learned about US!
Sherayx 9 months ago
who is the speaker? name?
DjRaaVANan 9 months ago
@DjRaaVANan His name is John Trudell. Look him up on Wiki, he is an amazing guy with an amazing gift of communication!
PsychStudent85 9 months ago