philippines has many bases of claiming spratlys especially the archepelagic doctrine that guarantees the phils. to extends its teritory to 200 nautical mile and signed by more than 100 nations in UNCLOS
(Part4/4)However, a radiocarbon dating investigation revealed the structures were created just 5 years ago. Japan Uyghur Association, Ilham Mahmut said. This is ridiculous! China has no right to accuse Japan of the boat incident around the Senkaku Islands. Senkaku Islands were Chinese territory? Obviously what China says is pure wrongdoing! Appealing stupid Chinese claims are libel and slander. It is natural that Japanese raising an objection. Japan should seek damages of this incident!!
(Part3/4) Suddenly, China changed their opinion, and claimed that the islands were Chinese property. Can you admit their attitude? What is justice? If another country acted the same way like China to your country, how would you feel? In fact, China wants to control Uyghur too. They made structures in country in Uyghur, and they appealed that the structures were made in old kingdom of China in ancient times. They say Uyghur area must be Chinese territory.
(Part2/4)Moreover, these islands were controlled by the U.S after Japan was outfought the WW2. In short, these islands have never controlled by China. In addition, former President of Republic of China Lee Teng-hui also once considered the islands are part of Okinawa in Taipei Times in Sep 5, 2009. Why and when China started to claim about the islands? The UN investigated underground resources around the island and reported a lot of oil there in 1969.
(Part1/4)The Senkaku islands were not inhabited up to 1895. A decade after the proposal, in 14 Jan. 1895 while in the midst of the Sino-Japanese War, Japan officially incorporated the islands under the administration of Okinawan. At that time, there were no countries claimed about the Japanese act. The geography textbook published in 1970 in Taiwan say, where every textbook had to be officially approved by the government, clearly showed the islands as Japanese territories.
oww!!, ali alatas of indonesia describes it as the "next potential conflict on the sea".. yeah,,, because it said to be that it has the potential to produce oil,,, and conflict arises because of "kasakiman",,,and if it means war-"_"we may not have the chance, philippines is just a dot compared to the nukes of china, but it doesnt mean we will do nothing"hehe
spratly thus and only belongs to the philippines,..it was Admiral Tomas Cloma who discovered the Kalayaan Group of islands among spratly chain, wayback in 1956, it was filipino settlers occupied the islands and no other race was present, i dont understand how indo and malay, as well as china, vietnam and brunei had a claim on it
Lol, most of the Territorial problems come from China. ps, Spratly's Islands are Philippine islands, before the oil crisis, only Philippine military were fully present there and many Filipinos live there at the present and in the past. The Chinese never even stepped on it or had any interest in it until they discovered some oil was under them.
Clearly they belong to the Philippines based on approximation rule. Using The Law of the Sea and EEZ, these islands clearly belong to the Philippines.
Chin\ese people thinks it's still their Qing Dynasty. Well then they should also claim Co Chin, now part of Vietnam Laos and Thailand, and also Liu Zhing now Luzon because they actually belong to them altogether during those Dynasties. Ridiculous! Is it?
There is no "approximation rule" I believe what you think you're talking about is proximity?Well that has no bearing on who owns what,if it did the USA would have claimed Cuba and all other countries within it's 200nm EEZ long ago.FYI, EEZ is NOT territorial waters but a responsibility.
To answer your question " I don't know how China came into the picture?"They as well as Vietnam mapped and claimed that area over 200 years ago.
te hace falta mencionar el conflicto entre Nicaragua y Costa Rica, el conflicto en el Esequibo, el diferendo maritimo entre Peru y Chile, el diferendo entre Nicaragua y Colombia.. uhhm Te sugiero una nueva version
read Don't laugh at this! Just do it Start thinking something you really really want cause this is astounding the person that sent this to me said their wish came true 10 mins after they read the mail so I thought what the heck You have just been visited by DrSuess's Cat in the Hat. He will grant you one wish Make your wish when the count down is over 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 MAKE A WISH Send this to 10 videos within the hour you read this. If you do, your wish will come true
philippines has many bases of claiming spratlys especially the archepelagic doctrine that guarantees the phils. to extends its teritory to 200 nautical mile and signed by more than 100 nations in UNCLOS
MrMokoKing 1 year ago
I wrote 1~4 comments, so please click all views!
undertakerRach 1 year ago
(Part4/4)However, a radiocarbon dating investigation revealed the structures were created just 5 years ago. Japan Uyghur Association, Ilham Mahmut said. This is ridiculous! China has no right to accuse Japan of the boat incident around the Senkaku Islands. Senkaku Islands were Chinese territory? Obviously what China says is pure wrongdoing! Appealing stupid Chinese claims are libel and slander. It is natural that Japanese raising an objection. Japan should seek damages of this incident!!
undertakerRach 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part3/4) Suddenly, China changed their opinion, and claimed that the islands were Chinese property. Can you admit their attitude? What is justice? If another country acted the same way like China to your country, how would you feel? In fact, China wants to control Uyghur too. They made structures in country in Uyghur, and they appealed that the structures were made in old kingdom of China in ancient times. They say Uyghur area must be Chinese territory.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part2/4)Moreover, these islands were controlled by the U.S after Japan was outfought the WW2. In short, these islands have never controlled by China. In addition, former President of Republic of China Lee Teng-hui also once considered the islands are part of Okinawa in Taipei Times in Sep 5, 2009. Why and when China started to claim about the islands? The UN investigated underground resources around the island and reported a lot of oil there in 1969.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
(Part1/4)The Senkaku islands were not inhabited up to 1895. A decade after the proposal, in 14 Jan. 1895 while in the midst of the Sino-Japanese War, Japan officially incorporated the islands under the administration of Okinawan. At that time, there were no countries claimed about the Japanese act. The geography textbook published in 1970 in Taiwan say, where every textbook had to be officially approved by the government, clearly showed the islands as Japanese territories.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
conflicto kenia-sudan-etipia en el atlantico sur??????
CheckEngine99 1 year ago
sao không dùng quay phim màn hình cho nét lại phải dùng cái công cụ " tiền xử " này
jemappellelong 1 year ago
oww!!, ali alatas of indonesia describes it as the "next potential conflict on the sea".. yeah,,, because it said to be that it has the potential to produce oil,,, and conflict arises because of "kasakiman",,,and if it means war-"_"we may not have the chance, philippines is just a dot compared to the nukes of china, but it doesnt mean we will do nothing"hehe
ALYANAH19 2 years ago
spratly thus and only belongs to the philippines,..it was Admiral Tomas Cloma who discovered the Kalayaan Group of islands among spratly chain, wayback in 1956, it was filipino settlers occupied the islands and no other race was present, i dont understand how indo and malay, as well as china, vietnam and brunei had a claim on it
ALYANAH19 2 years ago
Spratlys Island belong to the Philippines,and to the Filipino people,Historically,Politically,and Geographically.
mcbong10 2 years ago 2
Oh and the countries claiming that they own the Spratly's Islands are Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Vietnam, Brunei and the Philippines.
hvvvvp 2 years ago
Lol, most of the Territorial problems come from China. ps, Spratly's Islands are Philippine islands, before the oil crisis, only Philippine military were fully present there and many Filipinos live there at the present and in the past. The Chinese never even stepped on it or had any interest in it until they discovered some oil was under them.
hvvvvp 2 years ago 4
@hvvvvp Sorry, Republic of China (Taiwwan) station force there since 1946.
wtuanmu 1 year ago
@hvvvvp You haven't a clue as to what you're talking about.Get yourself some education.
HiFiman4u 7 months ago
Clearly they belong to the Philippines based on approximation rule. Using The Law of the Sea and EEZ, these islands clearly belong to the Philippines.
I don't know how China came into the picture.
2JFizzle3 2 years ago 5
Chin\ese people thinks it's still their Qing Dynasty. Well then they should also claim Co Chin, now part of Vietnam Laos and Thailand, and also Liu Zhing now Luzon because they actually belong to them altogether during those Dynasties. Ridiculous! Is it?
joefran4 2 years ago
@2JFizzle3Clearly you have no idea.
There is no "approximation rule" I believe what you think you're talking about is proximity?Well that has no bearing on who owns what,if it did the USA would have claimed Cuba and all other countries within it's 200nm EEZ long ago.FYI, EEZ is NOT territorial waters but a responsibility.
To answer your question " I don't know how China came into the picture?"They as well as Vietnam mapped and claimed that area over 200 years ago.
HiFiman4u 7 months ago
@2JFizzle3 Arrogant fucks maybe.
angelite143 7 months ago
bakit kinuha ng mga dayuhan ang spratly at parallel
lefas123456789 2 years ago
te hace falta mencionar el conflicto entre Nicaragua y Costa Rica, el conflicto en el Esequibo, el diferendo maritimo entre Peru y Chile, el diferendo entre Nicaragua y Colombia.. uhhm Te sugiero una nueva version
kerepakupai 2 years ago
@kerepakupai gago mga south america yan
Petlovedurian 1 year ago
there is conflict in GEORGIA Too, Georgian-Russian conflict
Patriot9991 3 years ago
que version de google earth es?
dahiperlentinisua2 3 years ago
no estoy muy seguro, pero recientemente apareció una más avanzada. descárgala desde la paina web del programa buscandolo en google
Caru4ever 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nobledonkey17 3 years ago
Thanx for using me ;D
GoogleHearth 3 years ago
ola aqui te dejo mi maxima puntuacion para que subas mas ejeje bueno espero que te pases aver mis videos y me votas porfa
morerr 3 years ago