@blackadderthe4 I will be offski soon. Where is your empirical proof? The world wide firestorms in the aftermath were sadly missed by many great guessologists. No matter, its still small potatoes against the Earths early years of life.
@blackadderthe4 You've released loads of video's showing no valid links. I'm just reading a paper on the early Earths atmosphere now. Fascinating but I feel a fair bit of it is surmised. However, his cannot be argued: (H2O, CO2, SO2, CO, S2, Cl2, N2, H2) and NH3 (ammonia) and CH4 (methane).
Enough CO2, CO and CH4 to greenhouse us away. hahaha!
Earth's Early Atmosphere and Oceans (lpi.usra.edu)
Volcanic eruptions spewed gases from Earth's interior to the atmosphere, a process called outgassing that continues today. Most of the gas was carbon dioxide and water vapor. The water vapor condensed to form part of Earth's oceans as the surface cooled. Comets may also have contributed water and complex organic molecules to Earth's environments.
Increased co2 levels bring heir own problems, such as benefits to weeds! It is not a silver bullet to food demand, under lab conditions planets may grow bigger, but they are not providing more edible food!
@blackadderthe4 oh FFS! If the cretins stop throwing poison on the ground because they manipulated grain to resist those poisons. We might actually have some bl**dy weeds!
Stop inventing problems in your head.
My house is not warm now 'cos of AGW, its warm because my space heaters work off sunlight.
'You should also stop stealing other peoples video's and claiming to be an authoritative source' well I'm not, because if you read in the description I have permission to use a lot and anyhow youtube operates on a fair usage principle! And why are still invisible?
@blackadderthe4 Why do I care not to say who I am, why does the Sun shine and why do bears sh*t in the woods?
Where's your response to 0.5*0.07*0.03? Why not ask why I've not included reflected radiation? ok, add 5% of the absorbed. Still an infinitesimally tiny amount. AGW is dead in the water. Where's your beef, are you paid to come out with this?
Climate change theory is like a jigsaw! You have pieces and try to work out a pattern (theory), Then you notice clumps match up and put them together . Some people try a piece from the deniers jigsaw but it’s obvious it doesn’t belong there and is rejected (peer reviewed)! And it's obvious that the theory makes sense! And seen as it's happening
@blackadderthe4 Climate change theory is very simple. Read the absorption from the Sun and the reflected light from the Earth. Look at the bands affected and real life facts that heat is followed by CO2 from the oceans and how much in volume is man's usage. Use history for empirical values. Like the massive impact from 75M years ago.. Did the Earth end up like Venus? nope. How about when the Earth had up to 7,000ppm CO2? We burnt? nope.
The affected bands are so minuscule to be unmentionable.
"we have taken co2 from 290ppm to 380 ppm or 1 part per 10,000, how can this have an effect? A male can weight 100Kg or 100,000 grams so 1/10,000 is 10grams. If you give him 10g of morphine he will be dead before it is [completely] inserted! So it is a ridiculous argument that 1 part in 10,000 can not have an effect." Dr Karl, Sydney uni
@blackadderthe4 There is no "we". Natural Earth heating releases CO2 from the oceans. In fact the oceans are 52x more concentrated in CO2 than air. The oceans are in theory potential Earth killers.
Haha. Not that it is going to happen no matter how man nuclear tests are carried out, no matter if we burn off every ounce of fuel. Will not and can not happen. It never happened in the past so will never happen now.
Are you having a larf or what? 'It never happened in the past' and I assume you haven't walked under a bus in the past, but that doesn't mean you will not walk under one next week! But we can hope, ROFL!
@blackadderthe4 So, tell me, how many times more CO2 is 7000 over 380ppm? Yes, 18x more and under the young Sun it did not greenhouse away. Did this place unbalance us and turn into Venus? You know! that planet with the high albedo atmosphere so it mops up nigh on all the light, UV and all the frequencies of IR.
Get my drift? Albedo, not 7% of the total light bandwidth but 100%
@blackadderthe4 Climate change putting up the price of Brits shopping? Shows you are a numb nuts. The pound has dropped in value against a basket of currencies. Your Gov't is printing notes and bonds like there is no tomorrow reducing their value. Wheelbarrows at the ready! I had no idea finances had and thing to do with global warming! Am I missing a piece of reality somewhere or has the USA's cold weather something to do with climate cooling?
Yes! I forgot the profits from growing fuel crops.
It is obvous you must not be listening to the video, because it quite clearly states that the US is not experiencing problems, however a recent TV programme reported on the drastic effects of the recent heat wave ib Texas! Stop building straw arguments so that you can knock them down! And search out the real science, but if you are like the so called Lord Monckton. you'll just ignore and invent your own 'science'! You FAIL yet again!
@blackadderthe4 It's obvious you have not read the paper. Calling them liars!! There are the bumper crops all over the world.. Including Russia!
It's all in the paper. Your recording is not representative of the truth. Typical of the BBC when the Gov't was hawking the public purse for AGW taxation. Yes, I've heard your plagiarized piece.
I've given proof this recording is lies. Where's YOUR proof?
@blackadderthe4 What about a localised heat wave? Thats weather when it suits you in the direction you are deluding yourself into.
Where have I failed? Explain. You can't even explain away why the Earth did not fry when it was over 7,000ppm CO2! It's because your version of reality simply does not exist.
'Thats weather' more extreme weather caused by AGW!' You can't even explain away why the Earth did not fry when it was over 7,000ppm CO2' oh yes I can! You are too hung up on co2 levels alone resulting in CC.
'the planet in the past two million years were probably triggered by fractional changes in solar heating (caused by wobbles in the planet's orbit, known as Milankovitch cycles’
@blackadderthe4 Idiot! Since that time there has been approximately a dozen full Milankovitch cycles. You really do live in a fantasy world.
Cycles or not. Why did the Earth not go runaway on air temperature? I'll tell you. CO2 only affects 7% of the 5250K blackbody and the return light is fuzzed out from water vapour to clearly get a reading from CO2.
You cannot escape reality. The more you reply with your imaginings, the more you get trapped.
'The more you reply with your imaginings, the more you get trapped' BOLLARDS! 'Idiot' and you are going the right way to being blocked! 'Why did the Earth not go runaway on air temperature?' because there are many different reasons for CC with different outcomes! Such as a giant volcanic eruption, for one. The same as skinning a cat! And WHY are you still invisible? Ashamed ar your untenable position? Because you are only bluffing!
@blackadderthe4 Stop making excuses when you don't have the facts at hand.
The Earth was young then but not that young!
Some 76M yr. ago, a huge meteorite hit the Yucaton peninsula which was all limestone. Nigh on killed every animal that could not bury itself. Well, after the dust settled one year later, the CO2 levels were at almost crazy levels. Did we toast up into a Venus like planet?
'the CO2 levels were at almost crazy levels' and who says that like? I've never heard that claimed by anybody! Where is the link to the info? As usual you're not making much sense!
@blackadderthe4 Hell, its even been on your famed tellers of truth. The BBC! Hahaha Not that they had an idea what they were saying at the time. ok, well, some geo prof. was telling it like it was, lol
Saying I'm not making any sense is not making any sense. Amazing how you are unable to comprehend me.
@blackadderthe4 You mean that natural history program off telly? Don't be silly. go look for yourself. It's everywhere!
"agiweb org/geotimes/apr03/NN_chicx"
"The Yucatán peninsula is a low-lying limestone platform which arose out of shallow seas during the Pleistocene, 2 million years ago and later. The crater site is thus buried under Quaternary (Pleistocene and Holocene) carbonate sediments from 0.6 to 1.0 km thick".. etc.
@m1aws y 90 million years ago, conifer-eating dinosaurs were forced to regions ... and survived in great herds until about 65 million years ago. ... that we know today as the town of Chicxulub in Mexico's Yucatan peninsula. ... The second result was that carbon dioxide released by the impacted limestone could have caused....
.. Asteroid impacts - perhaps multiple - impacted limestone 65 mya and released vast quantities of CO2. .... There was 10 million years between Chicxulub and the PETM. ... those were 65 and 55 million years ago, respectively. ...
.. that we know today as the town of Chicxulub in Mexico's Yucatan peninsula. ... that carbon dioxide released by the impacted limestone could have caused ...
... impacted limestone 65 mya and released vast quantities of CO2. .... There was 10 million years between Chicxulub and the PETM. CO2 has ...
Thanks for uploading this. Don't be surprised though when the idiots find it and start saying but "CO2 is plant food so increased CO2 will cancel out the effect of temperature" or some other drivel. They might even cite glasshouse trials, completely unaware that it is statistically and scientifically unsound to extrapolate controlled environment experiments to the outside world. Thanks again for uploading.
@m1aws
Why are suppling wrong links. anyhow no co2
'The asteroid landed in a bed of gypsum (calcium sulphate), which would have produced a vast sulphur dioxide aerosol'
ht tp://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/K%E2%80%93T_boundary#Chicxulub_Crater
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
The Texan drought?
Daily Climate : Lies As Big As Texas
Google: "real-science com/daily-climate-lies-big-texas"
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'Yet again, where is your valid link?' that co2 did for the dinosaurs? Why are you hiding again?
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 I will be offski soon. Where is your empirical proof? The world wide firestorms in the aftermath were sadly missed by many great guessologists. No matter, its still small potatoes against the Earths early years of life.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'Yet again, where is your valid link?' failure to reply means you have been economical with the truth and risk/will be BLOCKED!
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 You've released loads of video's showing no valid links. I'm just reading a paper on the early Earths atmosphere now. Fascinating but I feel a fair bit of it is surmised. However, his cannot be argued: (H2O, CO2, SO2, CO, S2, Cl2, N2, H2) and NH3 (ammonia) and CH4 (methane).
Enough CO2, CO and CH4 to greenhouse us away. hahaha!
m1aws 3 months ago
Earth's Early Atmosphere and Oceans (lpi.usra.edu)
Volcanic eruptions spewed gases from Earth's interior to the atmosphere, a process called outgassing that continues today. Most of the gas was carbon dioxide and water vapor. The water vapor condensed to form part of Earth's oceans as the surface cooled. Comets may also have contributed water and complex organic molecules to Earth's environments.
m1aws 3 months ago
Sea Level Continues To Plummet
Google: "real-science com/sea-level-continues-plummet"
m1aws 3 months ago
This is a lie.
Here's a paper on the subject:
Google: "Wheat Response to CO2 Enrichment: Growth and CO2 Exchanges at Two Plant Densities"
Want more? there's over 84 more I have found.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
Increased co2 levels bring heir own problems, such as benefits to weeds! It is not a silver bullet to food demand, under lab conditions planets may grow bigger, but they are not providing more edible food!
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 oh FFS! If the cretins stop throwing poison on the ground because they manipulated grain to resist those poisons. We might actually have some bl**dy weeds!
Stop inventing problems in your head.
My house is not warm now 'cos of AGW, its warm because my space heaters work off sunlight.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
I see your channel is still invisible! Why are you hiding?
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 I'm famous but don't believe me.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
I don't! In the meantime for some real science, not just cherry picking watch
watch?v=4wRoCBluQ50
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Seen it. Garbage. You should also stop stealing other peoples video's and claiming to be an authoritative source.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'You should also stop stealing other peoples video's and claiming to be an authoritative source' well I'm not, because if you read in the description I have permission to use a lot and anyhow youtube operates on a fair usage principle! And why are still invisible?
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Why do I care not to say who I am, why does the Sun shine and why do bears sh*t in the woods?
Where's your response to 0.5*0.07*0.03? Why not ask why I've not included reflected radiation? ok, add 5% of the absorbed. Still an infinitesimally tiny amount. AGW is dead in the water. Where's your beef, are you paid to come out with this?
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'AGW is dead in the water' not as dead as your brain! Do you have Grave's disease?
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Giving the very simple fact seen by all you cannot even supply any proof of AGW you now resort to mental violence.
Sad, sad man(?)
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
Climate change theory is like a jigsaw! You have pieces and try to work out a pattern (theory), Then you notice clumps match up and put them together . Some people try a piece from the deniers jigsaw but it’s obvious it doesn’t belong there and is rejected (peer reviewed)! And it's obvious that the theory makes sense! And seen as it's happening
watch?v=8sNtemijNn4
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Climate change theory is very simple. Read the absorption from the Sun and the reflected light from the Earth. Look at the bands affected and real life facts that heat is followed by CO2 from the oceans and how much in volume is man's usage. Use history for empirical values. Like the massive impact from 75M years ago.. Did the Earth end up like Venus? nope. How about when the Earth had up to 7,000ppm CO2? We burnt? nope.
The affected bands are so minuscule to be unmentionable.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'how much in volume is man's usage'
"we have taken co2 from 290ppm to 380 ppm or 1 part per 10,000, how can this have an effect? A male can weight 100Kg or 100,000 grams so 1/10,000 is 10grams. If you give him 10g of morphine he will be dead before it is [completely] inserted! So it is a ridiculous argument that 1 part in 10,000 can not have an effect." Dr Karl, Sydney uni
?v=f-3-Lf4-49M
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 There is no "we". Natural Earth heating releases CO2 from the oceans. In fact the oceans are 52x more concentrated in CO2 than air. The oceans are in theory potential Earth killers.
Haha. Not that it is going to happen no matter how man nuclear tests are carried out, no matter if we burn off every ounce of fuel. Will not and can not happen. It never happened in the past so will never happen now.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
Are you having a larf or what? 'It never happened in the past' and I assume you haven't walked under a bus in the past, but that doesn't mean you will not walk under one next week! But we can hope, ROFL!
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 So, tell me, how many times more CO2 is 7000 over 380ppm? Yes, 18x more and under the young Sun it did not greenhouse away. Did this place unbalance us and turn into Venus? You know! that planet with the high albedo atmosphere so it mops up nigh on all the light, UV and all the frequencies of IR.
Get my drift? Albedo, not 7% of the total light bandwidth but 100%
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'Get my drift?' not really, because English must be your second language!
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Climate change putting up the price of Brits shopping? Shows you are a numb nuts. The pound has dropped in value against a basket of currencies. Your Gov't is printing notes and bonds like there is no tomorrow reducing their value. Wheelbarrows at the ready! I had no idea finances had and thing to do with global warming! Am I missing a piece of reality somewhere or has the USA's cold weather something to do with climate cooling?
Yes! I forgot the profits from growing fuel crops.
m1aws 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Why did you not Google the facts before embarrassing yourself with politically loaded garbage!
Google: "World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates". a pdf document.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
It is obvous you must not be listening to the video, because it quite clearly states that the US is not experiencing problems, however a recent TV programme reported on the drastic effects of the recent heat wave ib Texas! Stop building straw arguments so that you can knock them down! And search out the real science, but if you are like the so called Lord Monckton. you'll just ignore and invent your own 'science'! You FAIL yet again!
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 It's obvious you have not read the paper. Calling them liars!! There are the bumper crops all over the world.. Including Russia!
It's all in the paper. Your recording is not representative of the truth. Typical of the BBC when the Gov't was hawking the public purse for AGW taxation. Yes, I've heard your plagiarized piece.
I've given proof this recording is lies. Where's YOUR proof?
m1aws 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 What about a localised heat wave? Thats weather when it suits you in the direction you are deluding yourself into.
Where have I failed? Explain. You can't even explain away why the Earth did not fry when it was over 7,000ppm CO2! It's because your version of reality simply does not exist.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'Thats weather' more extreme weather caused by AGW!' You can't even explain away why the Earth did not fry when it was over 7,000ppm CO2' oh yes I can! You are too hung up on co2 levels alone resulting in CC.
'the planet in the past two million years were probably triggered by fractional changes in solar heating (caused by wobbles in the planet's orbit, known as Milankovitch cycles’
w ww.newscientist.c om/article/dn11650
You are only palying with a busted flush again!
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Idiot! Since that time there has been approximately a dozen full Milankovitch cycles. You really do live in a fantasy world.
Cycles or not. Why did the Earth not go runaway on air temperature? I'll tell you. CO2 only affects 7% of the 5250K blackbody and the return light is fuzzed out from water vapour to clearly get a reading from CO2.
You cannot escape reality. The more you reply with your imaginings, the more you get trapped.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'The more you reply with your imaginings, the more you get trapped' BOLLARDS! 'Idiot' and you are going the right way to being blocked! 'Why did the Earth not go runaway on air temperature?' because there are many different reasons for CC with different outcomes! Such as a giant volcanic eruption, for one. The same as skinning a cat! And WHY are you still invisible? Ashamed ar your untenable position? Because you are only bluffing!
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Stop making excuses when you don't have the facts at hand.
The Earth was young then but not that young!
Some 76M yr. ago, a huge meteorite hit the Yucaton peninsula which was all limestone. Nigh on killed every animal that could not bury itself. Well, after the dust settled one year later, the CO2 levels were at almost crazy levels. Did we toast up into a Venus like planet?
Can you find an excuse for that one?
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
'the CO2 levels were at almost crazy levels' and who says that like? I've never heard that claimed by anybody! Where is the link to the info? As usual you're not making much sense!
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Hell, its even been on your famed tellers of truth. The BBC! Hahaha Not that they had an idea what they were saying at the time. ok, well, some geo prof. was telling it like it was, lol
Saying I'm not making any sense is not making any sense. Amazing how you are unable to comprehend me.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
But where is the LINK to your info? What are you hiding from?
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 You mean that natural history program off telly? Don't be silly. go look for yourself. It's everywhere!
"agiweb org/geotimes/apr03/NN_chicx"
"The Yucatán peninsula is a low-lying limestone platform which arose out of shallow seas during the Pleistocene, 2 million years ago and later. The crater site is thus buried under Quaternary (Pleistocene and Holocene) carbonate sediments from 0.6 to 1.0 km thick".. etc.
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws y 90 million years ago, conifer-eating dinosaurs were forced to regions ... and survived in great herds until about 65 million years ago. ... that we know today as the town of Chicxulub in Mexico's Yucatan peninsula. ... The second result was that carbon dioxide released by the impacted limestone could have caused....
m1aws 3 months ago
.. Asteroid impacts - perhaps multiple - impacted limestone 65 mya and released vast quantities of CO2. .... There was 10 million years between Chicxulub and the PETM. ... those were 65 and 55 million years ago, respectively. ...
m1aws 3 months ago
.. that we know today as the town of Chicxulub in Mexico's Yucatan peninsula. ... that carbon dioxide released by the impacted limestone could have caused ...
... impacted limestone 65 mya and released vast quantities of CO2. .... There was 10 million years between Chicxulub and the PETM. CO2 has ...
m1aws 3 months ago
@m1aws
Yet again, where is your valid link?
blackadderthe4 3 months ago
@blackadderthe4 These are off google. Where's yours?
m1aws 3 months ago
Thanks for uploading this. Don't be surprised though when the idiots find it and start saying but "CO2 is plant food so increased CO2 will cancel out the effect of temperature" or some other drivel. They might even cite glasshouse trials, completely unaware that it is statistically and scientifically unsound to extrapolate controlled environment experiments to the outside world. Thanks again for uploading.
uknowispeaksense 9 months ago
@uknowispeaksense
Thumbs up!
blackadderthe4 9 months ago