Yeah! More of a fool rather than cool. Feel like am in college again. We worked till 6 AM wow... 14 hours in the studio... Awesome... I had such a great time.... Yeah! I'm 14 years old... Hooray! This is the age of emphasizing!
Isnt the difference in the khz basically the amount of data you can fit in a session without it crapping out? Like u can fit more shit in a hd 192khz session than 44.1 before sounding distorted or over compressed? this seems to be a big question on youtube i think its a data issue more than a quality one.
Why don't you stop saying useless things and don't you show the "real" thing? All of you peolple cheating the ones, that comes here to learns somethis, should be send to a particular place, you can guess where....
1:01 analog tape : arrr, there be lulz ahoy!!! if avril and other pop idiots master there then they must SUCK cause avril's songs all sound like over-compressed "ocean surf"...
???? 16bit sucks!! 44.1kHz aint too hot either!! We all know vinyl mixes have to take into consideration the dynamic limitations of vinyl. But then so do digital mixes!!! ie dithering and hard limiting to -0.3dB. At least vinyl IS CAPABLE of real quality, 16bit 44.1kHz is sooooo damaged from the word go.
I was talking about vinyl vs CD... i know 16bit isnt the best, you can hear the difference pretty good on a good hifi if you compare it to a 24bit track.
So there i agree
44.1khz doesnt suck at all, in fact the human ear/brain cant hear frequencies higher than 20khz, so going higher than 44.1khz isnt necesary for listening purposes.
@Capeau the maximum reproducible frequency is meaningless. All that matters is how well the real analogue audio can be translated into a digital 'grid'. The finer the grid, the less the audio is distorted (and no, I don't mean clipped). I can hear benefits up to 192kHz on pretty much any DAC (though some DACs do work better at particular sampling frequencies).
@TheAndyroid Read up on the Nyquist Shannon Sampling theorem. 92khz might be slightly better, but scientifically speaking 192khz is a waste. Absolutely no audible difference.
Now, it is true that there can be a difference when comparing it to a 48khz track, it has more air, but going higher than that is overkill for listening purposes.
What +48khz frequencies are good for is mastering and editing. When you need to stretch for example, you will need the extra data to do it lossless (without interpolation) etc...
@Capeau DUDE! 48khz isn't the bloody frequency the audio is at! It means that when it is digitally recorded, the AD converter samples what position the wave is at 48000 times a second, or 44100 times a second. Don't post comments as if you know everything!
Come on... calm down. I just said I agree with you, but I prefer 2-inch tape. Vinyl is better than CD, indeed. Be polite, be cool man. It's no place to get angry...
those young guys always seem a ittle too "cool" as in in non-cool, they always try to seem cool, which makes them not. they alway shave big stories to tell, kind lilstenign to a child with lots of stories.
@LemonAndYoghurt what on earth are you talking about? to me that guy is cool because I would love to have his job and he does what he loves every day of the week. DOUCHE ALERT DOUCHE ALERT. SWEATY HAIR AND SMELLY PITS < Sound Engineers
5 minutes and 37 seconds? That's one short ass album. Usually the engineer will listen to the songs to take notes in any case mastering will take at least twice the albums length.
it depends how good the mixing was, if it was at all, and how good the recording was, depends on the person who mixed it and depends on the "master-er", their equipment, their experience, how picky they are, etc ... they probably, honestly just sit around and listen to music half the time trying to make it sound better, the rest is just monitoring graphs for peaks, listening 4 distortion, reverb, and "blehs" haha my two cents
MAKE IT LOUD!!!!
ThrowawayFolk 2 months ago
Yeah! More of a fool rather than cool. Feel like am in college again. We worked till 6 AM wow... 14 hours in the studio... Awesome... I had such a great time.... Yeah! I'm 14 years old... Hooray! This is the age of emphasizing!
WIPLQA 5 months ago 2
Hey...How do they get all of the instruments to sound like they are on their own in the mix?
stripes5150 6 months ago
Isnt the difference in the khz basically the amount of data you can fit in a session without it crapping out? Like u can fit more shit in a hd 192khz session than 44.1 before sounding distorted or over compressed? this seems to be a big question on youtube i think its a data issue more than a quality one.
aaronstarr1 7 months ago
Why don't you stop saying useless things and don't you show the "real" thing? All of you peolple cheating the ones, that comes here to learns somethis, should be send to a particular place, you can guess where....
valerianogaibazzi 10 months ago
think sony studios uses sony equipment? ^__^
PattyWhomperOFFICIAL 1 year ago
Google for :
AAMS Auto Audio Mastering System
denisvandervelde 1 year ago
@denisvandervelde Total crap. I hope that was a joke.
tobyanderson2007 9 months ago
how abouy you don't use your hands for speaking?
thehornypuppy 1 year ago
1:01 analog tape : arrr, there be lulz ahoy!!! if avril and other pop idiots master there then they must SUCK cause avril's songs all sound like over-compressed "ocean surf"...
gwb911 1 year ago
try putting air in your nose
aseriousoffender 1 year ago
Who mastered the audio for this vid? It quite sucks.
mirandansa 1 year ago 3
Why do all of these mastering vids show great equipment but lousy music.
MegaMixking 1 year ago 2
absolutly shit
menestrel76 1 year ago
That'd be a cool job unless you get assigned to work on the latest Metallica album. Then I'd want to quit and die.
firesoftheempyrean 2 years ago 3
man that was a piece of garbage
Capeau 2 years ago
f'n weiner nose! ^_^
shadowgovernment1 2 years ago 3
You should have gotten your master on vinyl. Cds just don't sound that good.
ddl312 3 years ago
vinyls are better than cds
FlintStudios 2 years ago 4
Got that right!
ddl312 2 years ago
you can record 'vinyl quality' on a cd but you cand do the other way around... now, tell me again which one rules? ;)
Capeau 2 years ago
@Capeau
???? 16bit sucks!! 44.1kHz aint too hot either!! We all know vinyl mixes have to take into consideration the dynamic limitations of vinyl. But then so do digital mixes!!! ie dithering and hard limiting to -0.3dB. At least vinyl IS CAPABLE of real quality, 16bit 44.1kHz is sooooo damaged from the word go.
TheAndyroid 1 year ago
@TheAndyroid
@TheAndyroid
I was talking about vinyl vs CD... i know 16bit isnt the best, you can hear the difference pretty good on a good hifi if you compare it to a 24bit track.
So there i agree
44.1khz doesnt suck at all, in fact the human ear/brain cant hear frequencies higher than 20khz, so going higher than 44.1khz isnt necesary for listening purposes.
Capeau 1 year ago
@Capeau the maximum reproducible frequency is meaningless. All that matters is how well the real analogue audio can be translated into a digital 'grid'. The finer the grid, the less the audio is distorted (and no, I don't mean clipped). I can hear benefits up to 192kHz on pretty much any DAC (though some DACs do work better at particular sampling frequencies).
TheAndyroid 1 year ago
@TheAndyroid
Im pretty sure you will failt at an a-b test between 48khz and 192khz.
Capeau 1 year ago
@TheAndyroid Read up on the Nyquist Shannon Sampling theorem. 92khz might be slightly better, but scientifically speaking 192khz is a waste. Absolutely no audible difference.
ScorchinBeats 11 months ago
@TheAndyroid Buy an EQ for 8 000 e and UNIVERSAL AUDIO preamp an SSL OTB and you will forget the point of sempling rait..
studiogoly 9 months ago
@studiogoly Good point!
TheAndyroid 7 months ago
@TheAndyroid
Now, it is true that there can be a difference when comparing it to a 48khz track, it has more air, but going higher than that is overkill for listening purposes.
What +48khz frequencies are good for is mastering and editing. When you need to stretch for example, you will need the extra data to do it lossless (without interpolation) etc...
Capeau 1 year ago
@Capeau DUDE! 48khz isn't the bloody frequency the audio is at! It means that when it is digitally recorded, the AD converter samples what position the wave is at 48000 times a second, or 44100 times a second. Don't post comments as if you know everything!
MandolinMan0001 1 year ago
@MandolinMan0001
i know that.
Btw your comment makes no sence... wtf you mean by '48khz isnt the bloody fequency the audio is at'?
Have you ever mastered audio for a DVD? which almost always is (re)sampled at 48khz.
Capeau 1 year ago
@FlintStudios stupid comment. they're different things completely. stop trying to sound like an expert
intertubers 1 year ago
@FlintStudios How is that relevant?
andosmate 1 year ago
@FlintStudios REALLY ?
tinnigeimgengill 1 year ago
that's why noone uses them right?
yousurfer2 2 years ago
ddl312
Yeah, ya right... but I prefer 2 inches tape.
kerebaka 1 year ago 2
@kerebaka What? Yeah Right What? you stupid little fuck face bitch, come out and say it loser.
ddl312 1 year ago
@ddl312
Come on... calm down. I just said I agree with you, but I prefer 2-inch tape. Vinyl is better than CD, indeed. Be polite, be cool man. It's no place to get angry...
kerebaka 1 year ago
Aquest idiota masteritza? es deu passar els dissabtes a Scorpia
donyarogelia 3 years ago
those young guys always seem a ittle too "cool" as in in non-cool, they always try to seem cool, which makes them not. they alway shave big stories to tell, kind lilstenign to a child with lots of stories.
LemonAndYoghurt 3 years ago 17
@LemonAndYoghurt you have issues
HidekoTakata 1 year ago
@LemonAndYoghurt what on earth are you talking about? to me that guy is cool because I would love to have his job and he does what he loves every day of the week. DOUCHE ALERT DOUCHE ALERT. SWEATY HAIR AND SMELLY PITS < Sound Engineers
TopTuneMelody 11 months ago
how much did they charge ?
MarcS4R 4 years ago
awesome man. Those guys really know how to take care of your music hey. Peace
cubworld 4 years ago
how long it takes o master a song?
miztaz 4 years ago 2
2 minutes 26 seconds usually
FlappyDraws 4 years ago
It takes much longer
dazzelya 4 years ago 3
5 minutes 37 seconds for the good stuff
mikehershfelt 3 years ago
5 minutes and 37 seconds? That's one short ass album. Usually the engineer will listen to the songs to take notes in any case mastering will take at least twice the albums length.
dazzelya 3 years ago
it depends how good the mixing was, if it was at all, and how good the recording was, depends on the person who mixed it and depends on the "master-er", their equipment, their experience, how picky they are, etc ... they probably, honestly just sit around and listen to music half the time trying to make it sound better, the rest is just monitoring graphs for peaks, listening 4 distortion, reverb, and "blehs" haha my two cents
ketogenesis 4 years ago 7
Until it's vibrant; clear; and punchy. Opposite of the sound on this video.
edward892 4 years ago 3