Wolves: A Legend Returns to Yellowstone part3

[maytimber]

I LOVE WOLVES!!!! <3

[Flowen]

Aw I feel bad for the sister. :(

[LilBlueEmbers]

Ive been looking for this show for FIVE YEARS ... THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!

[AcrotheraxFabalis]

Ahh I really like the noise of those elk, it sounds kinda... alien. :D Cool documentary.

[Mont556n]

@221nixon Who are you to tell me they belong here? Leave them in Canada and Alaska. PEOPLE live here, will continue to live here, and mabye a few wolves. NOT THOUSANDS. Your wolves will be moved out before the people do. Thats a good slogan, lets make montana a "wolf free state".

[ArticWolfOfWisdom93]

@Mont556n You have already proven that you trully dont care for either species and rather have us humans who dont need meat to survive kill 7000 animals in are life time, while wolves dont kill nearly as much even though they NEED to, to survive. Do the math 6.9Billion x 7000.

[Mont556n]

@221nixon Funny, but never said I was an elk hunter although I do put deer in the freezer every year and would like to try elk hunting again. The sorry thing is that my fellow montanans who guide out of staters and my friends who want to fill their freezers are losing out to a bunch of canadian wolves. The other sad side to the story is that many residents are removing the wolves themselves through shooting and other means. Its a bitch to lose several 600 dollar cows to wolves.

[Mont556n]

@221nixon Wolves do not belong here. That is just your opinion, we did fine withouth them. Now the bears around YNP are suffering due to lack of food and causing problems with people. Nice language. Just shows the prowolf hugger attitude. Can talk big on a computer.....

[Mont556n]

Now what we seem to be finding out is that where ever wolves are found, all other species of large wildlife drop drastically. It was a grave mistake to let these canadian wolves loose in the west....

[Bleedingclaw]

@Mont556n Yes while wolves do kill a lot of other wildlife if they didn't there'd be a drastic overpopulation of those animals. It wasn't technically a mistake. Too many animals would mean disease which would affect other animals, which in turn would affect us humans so in the long run it's better not worse.

[Mont556n]

@Bleedingclaw Actually, we seldom had this problem for the 100 years we had no wolves. Hunting seasons allowed people to utilize this resource and fill their freezers with low fat game. What you are spewing it the progressive dogma of the the wolf cult. We did fine without wolves before, and will do fine after they are removed.

[Bleedingclaw]

@Mont556n Well so your saying it's perfectly fine to kill animals for our food, but wolves can't for theirs? Not to mention many people don't obey hunting season laws. So there you go: Extinction. I personally don't care if you don't like them. I just can't stand it when people think they know how to "fix" nature. Nature wasn't meant to suit your needs it was meant to keep things in balance and if wolves kill too many, some will starve to death giving elk the time to repopulate. That's how it is

[Mont556n]

@Bleedingclaw Thousands of wolves in canada and alaska. No problem with extinction there, sorry. We don't need or want your wolves.

[Bleedingclaw]

@Mont556n What do you mean "we" many people here support wolves. Also your so worried about protecting other species by killing wolves it makes no sense. It makes you a hypocrite because all you seem to care about is your money. If your hunting for food that's fine I've got no problem with it. Sport is where it becomes the problem. Things functioned fine before the settlers arrived and killed them all. No bears or elk went extinct then, therefore your point technically becomes moot.

[ou812ic1]

Part####### 2.

[viper2788]

wheres part 2?

[Wolvesrock1314]

Its called NG Yellowstone Wolves part 2 I also had trouble finding it.

Good luck :)

[amberblaze27]

So Amazing!!!!!!

[Scatamaran62]

Thnk you for posting this on here