Added: 4 years ago
From: DebateTeam
Views: 1,132
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • how is it the that the Patriot act was a violation of peoples civil liberties yet taking money from people is not?

  • Because you ought to have the right to read whatever you want at the library without anyone knowing about it, but your money is put to better use lining the pockets of politicians, and keeping the poor where they are.

    Essentially, as with most political positions it is totally arbitrary and based on my failure to understand the greater picture.

  • Income redistribution is justified-yes because military spending and homeland security is an insurance to protect life and material wealth, the wealthy have more valuable lives and assets so their insurance rates must be higher- also the biggest users of government services are the very poor and very wealthy - also graduated taxes are portrayed as unfair to the wealthy as if that is some type of permanent class while I thought class is fluid in the USA and in time rich and poor may switch.

  • let's see how debates going ... zzzzzzzz

    3 comments 312 views in half a year :(

    Maybe in US jury is out on that.

    I think in France they still in.

  • We all know that income redistribution is socialism!

  • So you would stand resolved Negative on this resolution?

  • I would.

  • If so then I'm a proud socialist.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more