CHRIS MONCKTON (10/14/09) was "FACT-CHECKED" by a real scientist. Oops!!! Here is a brilliant "point-by-point" annotated refutation of Lord Monckton’s unabashed lies & disinformation regarding: CO2 levels & global warming Sea Level rise Melting polar ice Polar Bears Medieval Warm Period Ocean Acidification Solar Irradiance See YouTube: Abraham vs. Monckton /watch?v=QpOrjaWlC_E (John Abraham, PhD, is a Professor of Engineering (Thermal & Fluid Mechanics) with 80 published papers & patents.)
Yes, that's right. Monckton is in on the big conspiracy. Did he change them or correct them?
How is monckton going to correct the findings of professional scientists when moncktons a "Journalist"..Like i said moncktons works for SPPI an the SPPI gets payed by American Petroleum institute an Western Fuels an Hartland Foundation an Exxon Mobile Foundation.Moncktons a paid Fraud
Ah yes. The foolish "If it's Natural'", that is, not synthesized for man, it must be good in unlimited quantities. Try that at your next party. While you're at it, tell the Apollo Astronauts, who burned alive in their own 100% oxygenated capsule in the 1960's, that oxygen is good.
How mindless! Now think, if Humanity survives a 100 years or so without harm, we'll be in space! To the extent that such reasoning is representative of Humanity, it may be wise to allow GW to work its charm.
How is monckton going to correct the findings of professional scientists ROB when moncktons a "Journalist"..Like i said moncktons works for SPPI an the SPPI gets payed by American Petroleum institute an Western Fuels an Hartland Foundation an Exxon Mobile Foundation.Moncktons a paid Fraud
"We are going to concede that Carbon Dioxide and other Greenhouse Gases which possess or mimic a dipole moment, will cause warming if you add them to the atmosphere.
We concede also that human kind is adding CO2 to the atmosphere at about the rate that the NOAA figures mention.
So we're not trying to pretend that we're not the cause of the CO2 in the atmosphere increasing, we're not going to try and pretend that that CO2 will cause no warming."
@goog2k Could mean about a year ago, we just had hot year, wow really? Look at what your saying, march, jan, and feb were fucking hot, ya we had a warm year, wasn't that hot all over, sucks to be you. Guess Albama ain't so sweet now eh?
@hdb999 No, dummy, 2010 turned out to be tied for the HOTTEST year recorded in the last 120 years. Oops!
2010 Ties for Warmest Year on Record - NASA GISS
Despite a La Niña in the Pacific and a frigid year's end in Europe, global surface temperatures in 2010 tied 2005 as the warmest on record according to Goddard Institute for Space Studies analysis. (2011-01-12)
@goog2k Oh how about because they are recording temperatures in the hottest locations? Look into John Coleman, I believe he explains (or maybe its Lord Moncton either one of them) there have been a reduction in temperature recording facilities, many are based in the middle of a city, taking temperatures in ridiculous ways, just to "up the heat" record. Ya hottest year, easy to make that assumption with biased data.
I also think a guy going to prison over a block of cheese is insane (read about that one if you want, although many who are asleep will fail to realize anything). Keep drinking your fluoride-water. Hope theres no warrant out for your arrest when that librarian goes after you for an overdue DVD like what happened to that 19 year old guy the other day.
They wont hesitate to call Monckton "insane" but then cower away back to sleep in their nice warm blankets where George Bush ran the country, and now Obama is taking his place and carrying off where he left.
If you ask me who's insane, its guys who want to go to war with other countries, I think fluoride in water is insane too. I also think getting fined millions of dollars for a garage sale is insane (check fox news if you want to know about that).
A barrel floating in the ocean will grow a seaweed farm. It would be easy to create rainforest sized algae farms mid ocean. The seaweed farms would photosynthesize, as well as the lifeforms themselves would be made of carbon.
Cheap. Proactive. Harmless.
Also mid ocean seaweed (algae) farms could be towed to countries in need for emergency food fuel.
No downside.
Build seaweed farms from shore and tow them out to sea and anchor them. Polluting companies could sponsor the low costs.
no if AGW supporters are wrong you sold all of humanity into slavery keeping the 3rd world poor starving people by diverting food to biofuels and puting all humans under scientific dictartorship where the government tells you what you can use how much you can use and when you can use in the name of science not to metion the millions of deaths in the name of depopulation 4 the enviroment
@moneyjr1122 luckily the reports the IPCC shows you report showing that hurricanes are increasing, but just a couple of years before the cutoff (what year there report shows) they were higher then now.... Go back to sleep, you are not being lied to.
More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
700 dissenting scientists from around the globe challenged man-made global warming claims made by the UN IPCC & Al Gore This new 2009 U.S. Senate Minority Report -- updated from 2007s-features the skeptical voices of over 700 prominent international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC AGW claims
Those few "scientist" who stand in denial of global warming^ have FAILED in the last 15 years(!) to produce A SINGLE(!!!), peer-reviewed scientific article that challenges the theory and -evidence- of human-induced global warming.
monckey works (among other ultra-pro economy rightwinged lobby groups) for the big oil&tobaco etc..funded, heartland institute to confuse public -as always- and specially in environmenal issues.
That would be nice if catastrophic AWG has been proven. If you have any evidence that could prove high climate feedback for Co2 rise, then please send it to me please.
Other then that, we should just wait Roy Spencer's new paper about the effect of the low clouds.
AGW-supporter and scientists would love that AGW were "a fraud"...
What happens when the science is wrong and we follow? We would have a much cleaner +cheaper energy, work, peace and less nature distortion. hooah
What happen when the few "denialists" are wrong? And we follow? Pollution increases, seas will die soon, weather will become extreme(!) everywhere. Mass extinction. Earth will completely comes out of its BALANCE, finally ends like mars. -exitus
this is not my view, this is what science tell us today^
btw:
Monckey monckton ["the filthy frog"] *works* amongst others for the heartland institute, a rightwinged extremist corrupted conservative ""free""-market economy lobbyist-liar-industry. Known to attack science, specially in environmental issues, to block political actions. They are NOT interested in being honest science.
They ONLY want to confuse public. For their profit-game.
Could someone still prove catastrophic AGW for me? If there is no scientific proof for the theory, then only pure science dictates that it is supposed to be discardet.
I'm up for renewable energy, that is fantastic. What I'm for is for little more planning before we start pouring our money in.
Also, Mars? How does the possible weather extreme destroy our magnetic field? Any change of proving me that the weather has become more extreme?
The feedbacks are very dangerous, but its nearly impossible to predict them 100% (also not usual to prove anything 100%..) - but they have "overwhelming" evidence and every respected scientific body on this planet agrees with that.
go NASA website for a mayor, if you dont trust ipcc anymore...
(thanks pr-campaigns, scandal-media and flat earth communitys..)
and watch greenman3610 and potholer54 videos - its fun
Do you really want 'proof' of catastrophic AGW?! I mean do you want a forecast that is also 'proof'? I can't imagine such a thing - until we have time travel anyway.
The link I gave you outlines the body of evidence supporting AGW. Within that I could point you to papers addressing particular aspects of the phenomenon. Do you need to know for sure just how 'catastrophic' it might be? Is that it?
Yes I believe in AGW, that has never been the question.
But I take more Roy Spencer and/or John Christy stance on the issue. So far the only evidence that the effecty will be catastrophic I have seen is the computer models in the IPPC Fourth Assestment report.
Can you provide me with evidence that would debunk Roy Spencer's papers on the low cloud effect? If we don't know facts as simple as low cloud reactions, then how we can hope to find how much feedback will there be.
But, no evidence to support your believes, no real argument.
I have pointed out to Spencer's and Christy's peer-reviewed literature and unless someone can point me to evidence debunking for example Spencer's papers (mission were Real Climate's "Spencer's Folly" failed) then that leaves me to the conclusion of supporting Spencer's work wich would show that the warming will be around 0.5 degrees Kelvin in the next 100 years.
"650 of the world's top climatologists stood up and said man-made global warming is a media generated myth without basis. For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming?" -- Climatologist Dr. David Gee, Chairman of the International Geological Congress,
@TheAntiLeft Agreed, then they'll change their stance and say that global cooling is a result of CO2. If the climate stabilises they'll say that CO2 causes it and humanity will become over-comfortable and over stability and over comfort will lead to the decay of civilization so a huge tax is necessary.
The fact is there is ZERO evidence of Anthropogenic Global Warming, I mean...they have not presented ONE SHRED OF PROOF!!! Amazing huh??!!
What's more amazing, is the fact that the same nut-bags proselytizing their gospel of Thermal Armageddon (lest we shut down capitalism) are the SAME who endlessly chanted "Nuclear Winter" throughout the Cold War, attempting to shut down capitalism by having us surrender to communism.
Same socialist mystics; same goal; same Thermometer Gods; opposite end of the thermometer.
Monckton's comments on DDT show a remarkable combination of scientific illiteracy & outright lies & advocated construction of concentration camps for compulsory incarceration of all AIDS sufferers.
It is a sad reflection on our priorities that real scientists are ignored whilst charlatans such as Monckton (who is not even a Lord although he creatively refers to himself as a "peer of the House of Lords" ) set about engineering public opinion with pseudoscientific nonsense.
He is the senior policy advisor for the SPPInstitute, , funded by ExxonMobil and alleges that climate change is a global communist conspiracy to impose a world government and he calls supporters of action on climate change Nazis & Hitler youth. His statements about climate change science reflect his scientific credentials at best they are mistaken , at worst straight out lies & fabrications.
Monckton is a total fraud : His scientific qualifications are a diploma in journalism studies and he was an advisor to the Thatcher government.. on the sale of council flats (he claims also to have been an advisor on warship hydrodynamics - amazing what a diploma in journalism studies qualifies you to do). He has also been an immigration consultant to some very dodgy companies............
Why not?" (i) Why are you wanting a former politician & a dodgy former journalist to debate real science? Why are you not asking scientists? (ii) For the reason evolutionary biologists dont waste their time debating nutty creationists
Evolution is only possible with HETEROSEXUAL relationships, yet you stupid, uneducated homosexuals want to get married? You believe the same thing as the creationists - you all believe your weenies come from heaven.
""Evolution is only possible with HETEROSEXUAL relationships, yet you stupid, uneducated homosexuals want to get married?"" ............. are you really that moronic?? (silly question - you are a follower of "Lord" Minckton - you obviously believe any inane bullshit) Evolution happens in all species , whether heterosexual or asexual. Try reading a high school science text I am not homosexual , idiot
@wildcrazygoats You obviously believe in the nutbag psychic staring at goats CIA bullshit due to your name.
See what I did there? made an unsubstantiated fallacious association, which is exactly what you're doing, Monckton speaks about climate change, not evolution. You do realise that all the science is against man-made global warming don't you?
GIM appears to have considerable influence over the major carbon-credit trading firms that currently exist: the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) in the U.S. and the Carbon Neutral Company (CNC) in Great Britain. CCX is the only firm in the U.S. that claims to trade carbon credits.
Al Gore is chairman and founder of a private equity firm called Generation Investment Management (GIM). According to Gore, the London-based firm invests money from institutions and wealthy investors in companies that are going green. Generation Investment Management, purchases -- but isnt a provider of -- carbon dioxide offsets, said spokesman Richard Campbell in a March 7 report by CNSNews.
Still does not change the fact that the scientists got caught cooking the data to match the theory when they are supposed to change the theory to match the data.
You can argue the charts and graphs all day long. In my opinion, the leaked emails effectively sawed off one of the legs of this three legged stool called "man made climate change".
its true the so called scientists have cooked the books. thats why they call it 'climate change' and not 'global warming' now.
there are too many discrepencies in the data to form a definite conclusion. also the peer review process is massively corrupted , so it is therefore not science. heads need to roll, and im getting a new axe for christmas.
It is called "climate change" because that is a more accurate term than "global warming". Climate change indicates that the impacts will vary from place to place according to unique local circumstances in accordance with the climates' complexity.
Of course, conservatives are too stupid to do complex. Conservatives are too uneducated to comprehend science. Conservatives aren't intelligent enough to evaluate risk.
@dmathew1024 question/ 'does increased co2 levels in the atmosphere contribute to global warming due to the greenhouse effect'.
answer/ obviously not.
also. if you put food in the oven ALL of the food gets hotter, not just some of the food no matter how 'complex' the food is.
thats why the so called scientists are lying , because their whole reputation has been shattered. due to the fact that the planet is getting colder. lol
Carbon dioxide's role as a greenhouse gas was scientifically established back in the 19th century ... but it is evident that your mind is stuck back in the Dark Ages with ignorance and superstition guiding your pollution-love.
Are conservatives really so stupid and gullible as the conservatives here? It is a sad comment on the Republican party that all it has left are people like you.
1/ increased co2 follows global warming, not the other way round.
2/ i'm not a conservative or republican, nor do i live in the us. political parties ,religions (incl science) and all ideologies are corrupted by degree.
3/. i would like fries with my burger (easy on the mayo)
It's so good to see so many people starting to wake up to smell the bs... It truly is a religion, this whole global warming thing... And like the church, the preachers are the ones to gain from this religion...
Not by CO2, but it is partly man-made...by those who want the taxes and who are fighting now in Copenhagen to get it thrue! HAARP, the whole world full of CHEMTRAILS; that is changing the climate. Ofcourseabove all, there is the fact of activity of the Sun.
dmathew1024 is a perfect example of why people are starting to question the religion of global warming. Try and even have a discussion and immediately these liberal tards revert back to childish name calling. It is all so shamefully sad.
dmathew1024 wanted me to let you all know that the science regarding string theory has been settled for 20 years, and anyone who brings it up loves Sarah Palin for some reason.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I am English, not British (they are the conquered people) and any tongue that confesses my angelic language (including your own ignorant self) has conceded defeat.
Perhaps you should become a little more educated before any further asinine commentary?
You still don't understand the privilege of nobility... The trouble we have is that you commoners don't understand warfare (Lord Monckton does). Commoners have usurped the seats of their sovereigns in the world, making not only yourselves subject to conquest, but also those of us in the nobility.
Unless we crown a king who the young men would wager their lives to follow (one of our own younger princes among us), this will be our undoing in many, many ways - kill the lawyers.
You can't actually invoke a law. Godwin's Law is just that, a social law. The longer you and I argue, the more likely you are to show how much of a Nazi you are. That is all.
Its really too bad I spend the majority of my time doing core XNU kernel development so idiots like you have the ability to go on youtube and find children to rape.
Poor Bob Dole ... puffing up his resume after he has conclusively demonstrated that he is an unecucated conservative idiot who irrationally invokes Godwin's Law because he is just too stupid and too emotional to know any better.
Free yourself from your human-guilt. Confess your sins. I know you want to.
Don't you want to live a life without guilt, a life without fear of some sort of God? A life where you can do and act how you feel without being constrained to a perverted set of Al Gore's 'values.'
Bob Dole failed in his science argument and now he wants to become a preacher. He's a good conservative preacher, that Bob Dole, he reminds me of Ted Haggard.
Who's the preacher, I'm still trying the science argument. A scientist might have to resort to some touchy-feely stuff when arguing with a moronic enviro-theologian though.
Well I don't see any reason to troll on YouTube to show off my academic superiority, it's a very immature thing. I suppose it would also be very naive to base one's level of education with the information found here, wouldn't you agree?
And as I implied earlier kid, your stuck-up attitude and Sara Palin-shit is definitely annoying.
Believe anyone? No, of course not, but, if someone says, check these 3 scientific reports for evidence that disprove greenhouse warming as the primary force increasing temperature, I can then check it
I mean, you look at Roy Spencers work, that proves that clouds actually are negative feedback, not positive as the IPCC says. You look at Richard Lindzen, and the data coming from the Earth Energy Budget Satellite, which proves that greenhouse gases have very little effect on recent temp increase
this is info that should be on every television station, I only heard about it through youtube
You hear about Van Jones saying that the Green Movement is an effective way to implement socialism in America, only heard about it on FOX
And they didn't distort what he said, cause it wasn't a sound bite, it was several minutes of uncut speech, to establish the context of what he was saying
this, and dozens of other stories completely ignored by most media outlets, like the bio fuels scam driving up food prices causing food riots in the 3rd world, caused by YOUR blind belief in global warming
FOX and Youtube are the only ones telling us the news, so yes, they constitute open and free information
Van Jones ... the socialist bogeyman ... you really are a dupe. The most stupid uninformed people rely upon Fox News for their daily dose of propaganda and conspiracy theory BS.
You really need to educate yourself because otherwise you are going to remain an easily manipulated dupe.
You are gullible enough to believe the lies of cranks and oil industry shills. You might as well be a young earth creationist if you standards of proof are so very low.
Scientifically illiterate people rank among the most easily manipulated dupes on the planet. If you people hear a lie often enough soon enough it sounds like God's own truth.
Please do find better authorities than these liars.
So, your argument, is name calling? Wow, demonstrating the debating skill of a 3rd grader, very nice. In no way does this prove my point of, you guys can only debate when you control all dissemination of information
But ok, I'm game, I'll weed through your inane babble, and pull out a few points
research biofuels, one of the "advantages" is they have less emissions, particles, CO2, etc
Van Jones. Are saying he didn't believe these things? if so, why is he gone?
Find better authorities, sorry, not gonna happen. I don't look for "authorities". An argument from authority is not a valid argument. You argue the science in a scientific debate.
If you don't know the science, stay out of the debate.
Second, the people I cited do not take Oil money, they are paid via the Universities they research at. And even if they did take Oil money, it would make no difference
How they get funded doesnt change the measurements they have, cause unlike the IPCC, they actually have measured data
Richard Lindzen, using satellites to measure how much heat is radiating off the earth out into space, and charting against the temp you're all worried about. He found, that as temps go up, more energy escapes into space
Explain how that works, if temps go up, and more energy is escaping into space, well then that energy isnt being trapped down here causing global warming is it?
"Unlike the IPCC, they actually have measured data ... "
Are you really so stupid? The IPCC report is thousands of pages long and it references thousands of peer reviewed scientific articles, all of which are based upon their own mountain of measured data.
By qouting Richard Lindzen as if he is God rather than an oil-soaked lobbyist for polluting industries you reveal yourself as the gullible sort of dupe.
You lie when you say that the people you cite don't take oil money. The oil money flowing through the denialism movement is as well documented as the tabacco money which sustained tha anti-medical science movement against classifying nicotine as addictive.
The fact that you are an easily manipulated dupe doesn't change the reality of science.
Stop living in the 19th century. You are fighting a battle which you lost a long time ago.
You write in an incoherent manner. Perhaps you should rewrte your entire Van Jones screed so that I might actually make sense of your argument.
But I know that dittohead drones find it difficult to write anything intelligent because they lack an education and receive their talking points from blowhards.
Read a book. Become an informed American. Stop being a dupe.
Capatilist ... did you intentionally mispell "capitalist" or are you one of those uneducated people who are too stupid to comprehend science and too unintelligent to know any better?
How would you even know? and Further, why does it matter? Tell me where their assertions don't match the data
Roy Spencer always makes his data open and available. Lindzen makes his data open and available. How come there are standing FIOA requests on the data the IPCC relies on? How come its not an open process?
You're right, I would have no use for the raw data, but I still want it public
That way, its an open process. And two different graphs are produced from the same raw data, we know we have to look at the computer programs processing the data, to find out who is wrong, or who is distorting
Surely you're not going to argue against transparency and accountability?
You are not in favor of transparency and accountability. The raw data has always been available to those who really wanted to find it ... those pesky oil lobbyists demanding for the raw data weren't asking in good faith.
The raw data for one of the temp sets resided in the US, there was a FIOA request, and suddenly the data was moved over to Europe
The raw data in NASAs possession, is also under a FIOA request, which they have been evading ever since
The raw data from east anglia has been under a FIOA request for years, with those e-mails being revealed, the request was stepped up to, "we're not asking". Now we find out the data was deleted, whoops!
Now, there is no way to verify the data from anglia, any report that relies heavily on that data set, needs to be voided
And to make sure this is not happening else where, all the raw data from the 5 primary data sets, minus the one from anglia, needs to be made public, pure and simple. Made available to scientist, engineers, Oil Mogols, Drug lords, Politicians, Lawyers, everyone. Every single person in the world, should have access to this
Have you read the IPCC report? Until you read the IPCC report I am going to have to assume that you are a brain-dead dittohead drone who really isn't interested in actual scientific knowledge.
There are over 100,000 pages of publish scientific findings in regard to the climate over the last several decades. If you remain ignorant it is your own fault.
He IS good. He must have practised that accent like mad! Cohen is definately one of the greats of comedy!
Todi65 2 months ago
Comment removed
drryanrtaylor 3 months ago
Lord Monckton is Sacha Baron Cohen. VERY NICE.
stebbi94 3 months ago 3
@stebbi94 You are wrong. Lord Monckton is Lord Monckton and NOT Sacha Baron Cohen. Who told you this rubbish?
MrIntegrator1 1 month ago
i must say, Lord Monckton is an absolute genius! bwahahahaha
dreadedoc 3 months ago
THIS GUY IS BORAT! VERY NICE!!!!!!!!!
alahbalah 3 months ago
What the hell does a British journalist and politician know about climate change? What an idiot and buffoon.
redrockraven 4 months ago
sounds like any other conspiracy theorist, full of bullshit and totally believing the rot flowing out there mouth.
utubecaneatshit 6 months ago
Well well, there you have the truth of global warming. An income generator for the scientific community.
ChadlElliottcom 7 months ago
See a new documented YT critique of Monckton's habitual LIES by an Australian science journalist:
Monckton Bunkum Part 1 - Global cooling and melting ice
/watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM&feature=related
Monckton Bunkum Part 2 - Sensitivity
/watch?v=PTY3FnsFZ7Q&feature=related
Monckton Bunkum Part 3 - Correlations and Himalayan glaciers
/watch?v=fpF48b6Lsbo&feature=related
It's absolutely devastating & fully documented.
Monckton is a typical SCAM artist making a lot of money promoting Oil & Coal.
goog2k 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jestes ciekaw prawdy smolenskiej? Zastanawiasz sie dlaczego slady sa systematycznie zacierane? Dlaczego media nie mowia wszystkiego chociasz powinny? Wejdz na "zagrozenia org" nie jestes sam/sama. Zapraszamy!
yut785iur6754it674
gogleNWO 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
goog2k 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes, that's right. Monckton is in on the big conspiracy. Did he change them or correct them?
How is monckton going to correct the findings of professional scientists when moncktons a "Journalist"..Like i said moncktons works for SPPI an the SPPI gets payed by American Petroleum institute an Western Fuels an Hartland Foundation an Exxon Mobile Foundation.Moncktons a paid Fraud
kickatoe 1 year ago
Global warming is a great thing ...if it is true...more food for people...but we're probably going into an Ice age....so win win
SongmanC 1 year ago
Your own breath CO2...be very afraid.....Boo
SongmanC 1 year ago
@SongmanC
Ah yes. The foolish "If it's Natural'", that is, not synthesized for man, it must be good in unlimited quantities. Try that at your next party. While you're at it, tell the Apollo Astronauts, who burned alive in their own 100% oxygenated capsule in the 1960's, that oxygen is good.
How mindless! Now think, if Humanity survives a 100 years or so without harm, we'll be in space! To the extent that such reasoning is representative of Humanity, it may be wise to allow GW to work its charm.
1VILLABOLO 1 year ago
@1VILLABOLO your in space now I Presume...?
SongmanC 1 year ago
@1VILLABOLO
WALLE
wispa1a 1 year ago
your own breath ...be very,very scared....boo
SongmanC 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How is monckton going to correct the findings of professional scientists ROB when moncktons a "Journalist"..Like i said moncktons works for SPPI an the SPPI gets payed by American Petroleum institute an Western Fuels an Hartland Foundation an Exxon Mobile Foundation.Moncktons a paid Fraud
kickatoe 1 year ago
Wow, people take this pointless little fraud seriously. I Britain he is widely considered to be a joke. Don't listen to him FFS!
TipoftheSlung 1 year ago
"We are going to concede that Carbon Dioxide and other Greenhouse Gases which possess or mimic a dipole moment, will cause warming if you add them to the atmosphere.
We concede also that human kind is adding CO2 to the atmosphere at about the rate that the NOAA figures mention.
So we're not trying to pretend that we're not the cause of the CO2 in the atmosphere increasing, we're not going to try and pretend that that CO2 will cause no warming."
Lord Monckton Brisbane debate 29 January 2010
unenergy 1 year ago 2
Dr Christy is part of the IPCC Goog, and the IPCC is a fraudulent lobbying arm of the UN. The statistics have been doctored.
cienade 1 year ago
WHAT COOLING?
March was the HOTTEST March in the UAH 32 year satellite record.
UAH (Univ. of Alabama, Huntsville) is run by Dr. Christy, the well known AGW denier.
Global temperatures for February = 2nd WARMEST February in 32 years.
Global Temperatures for JANUARY = the HOTTEST January for UAH in 32 years.
LOL!!!
HOT OFF THE PRESS - 4/10/10
See the hilarious, delightful YouTube from greenman3610
Debunking LORD MONCKTON Part 1
/watch?v=JfA1LpiYk2o
goog2k 1 year ago 2
@goog2k Could mean about a year ago, we just had hot year, wow really? Look at what your saying, march, jan, and feb were fucking hot, ya we had a warm year, wasn't that hot all over, sucks to be you. Guess Albama ain't so sweet now eh?
hdb999 10 months ago
@hdb999 No, dummy, 2010 turned out to be tied for the HOTTEST year recorded in the last 120 years. Oops!
2010 Ties for Warmest Year on Record - NASA GISS
Despite a La Niña in the Pacific and a frigid year's end in Europe, global surface temperatures in 2010 tied 2005 as the warmest on record according to Goddard Institute for Space Studies analysis. (2011-01-12)
Duhh???
goog2k 10 months ago
@goog2k Oh how about because they are recording temperatures in the hottest locations? Look into John Coleman, I believe he explains (or maybe its Lord Moncton either one of them) there have been a reduction in temperature recording facilities, many are based in the middle of a city, taking temperatures in ridiculous ways, just to "up the heat" record. Ya hottest year, easy to make that assumption with biased data.
hdb999 9 months ago
@hdb999 Actually, that was already carefully studied and DISPROVEN!
Watch the latest scientific info:
Unwinding "Hide the Decline
/watch?v=tz8Ve6KE-Us&feature=channel_video_title
goog2k 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Monckton pwned once again.
/watch?v=JfA1LpiYk2o
acidgawd999 1 year ago
lol this guy is bullshit
mykmmc 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@mykmmc WHAT COOLING? LOL!!!
March was the HOTTEST March in the UAH 32 year satellite record.
UAH (Univ. of Alabama, Huntsville) is run by Dr. Christy, the well known AGW denier.
Global temperatures for February = 2nd WARMEST February in 32 years.
Global Temperatures for JANUARY = the HOTTEST January for UAH in 32 years.
HOT OFF THE PRESS - 4/10/10
See the latest delightful YouTube from greenman3610
Debunking LORD MONCKTON Part 1
/watch?v=JfA1LpiYk2o
goog2k 1 year ago
I also think a guy going to prison over a block of cheese is insane (read about that one if you want, although many who are asleep will fail to realize anything). Keep drinking your fluoride-water. Hope theres no warrant out for your arrest when that librarian goes after you for an overdue DVD like what happened to that 19 year old guy the other day.
ketogenesis 1 year ago
They wont hesitate to call Monckton "insane" but then cower away back to sleep in their nice warm blankets where George Bush ran the country, and now Obama is taking his place and carrying off where he left.
ketogenesis 1 year ago
If you ask me who's insane, its guys who want to go to war with other countries, I think fluoride in water is insane too. I also think getting fined millions of dollars for a garage sale is insane (check fox news if you want to know about that).
ketogenesis 1 year ago
This guy is insane, and I pity anyone who listens to this anti science babble.
sterlinguini 1 year ago
this guy is retarted
MrElectricdude 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A barrel floating in the ocean will grow a seaweed farm. It would be easy to create rainforest sized algae farms mid ocean. The seaweed farms would photosynthesize, as well as the lifeforms themselves would be made of carbon.
Cheap. Proactive. Harmless.
Also mid ocean seaweed (algae) farms could be towed to countries in need for emergency food fuel.
No downside.
Build seaweed farms from shore and tow them out to sea and anchor them. Polluting companies could sponsor the low costs.
Win Win Win
RichLOAguy 1 year ago
no if AGW supporters are wrong you sold all of humanity into slavery keeping the 3rd world poor starving people by diverting food to biofuels and puting all humans under scientific dictartorship where the government tells you what you can use how much you can use and when you can use in the name of science not to metion the millions of deaths in the name of depopulation 4 the enviroment
titbumtit1 1 year ago
no such thing as a climate crisis wel then what do you call a blizzard or a tornado or a hurricane...... just a day of fun?
moneyjr1122 1 year ago
@moneyjr1122 luckily the reports the IPCC shows you report showing that hurricanes are increasing, but just a couple of years before the cutoff (what year there report shows) they were higher then now.... Go back to sleep, you are not being lied to.
TheHersey 1 year ago
huh??
moneyjr1122 1 year ago
U. S. Senate Minority Report:
More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
700 dissenting scientists from around the globe challenged man-made global warming claims made by the UN IPCC & Al Gore This new 2009 U.S. Senate Minority Report -- updated from 2007s-features the skeptical voices of over 700 prominent international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC AGW claims
Thisawareness 2 years ago
VERY easy:
Those few "scientist" who stand in denial of global warming^ have FAILED in the last 15 years(!) to produce A SINGLE(!!!), peer-reviewed scientific article that challenges the theory and -evidence- of human-induced global warming.
monckey works (among other ultra-pro economy rightwinged lobby groups) for the big oil&tobaco etc..funded, heartland institute to confuse public -as always- and specially in environmenal issues.
what about to *wake up*?
aerobique 2 years ago
You said it. The Majority is always right!
The issue is a small group of scientists hold the original climate data and won't allow anyone outside of their group to review it.
You have to ask WHY?
Make it 100% available and put Monckton out of business for crying out loud.
I don't understand why they don't do this. What's to gain by hiding their data?
grl8862 2 years ago
That would be nice if catastrophic AWG has been proven. If you have any evidence that could prove high climate feedback for Co2 rise, then please send it to me please.
Other then that, we should just wait Roy Spencer's new paper about the effect of the low clouds.
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
AGW-supporter and scientists would love that AGW were "a fraud"...
What happens when the science is wrong and we follow? We would have a much cleaner +cheaper energy, work, peace and less nature distortion. hooah
What happen when the few "denialists" are wrong? And we follow? Pollution increases, seas will die soon, weather will become extreme(!) everywhere. Mass extinction. Earth will completely comes out of its BALANCE, finally ends like mars. -exitus
Denialism is a (the) industry.
aerobique 1 year ago
this is not my view, this is what science tell us today^
btw:
Monckey monckton ["the filthy frog"] *works* amongst others for the heartland institute, a rightwinged extremist corrupted conservative ""free""-market economy lobbyist-liar-industry. Known to attack science, specially in environmental issues, to block political actions. They are NOT interested in being honest science.
They ONLY want to confuse public. For their profit-game.
check channel greenman3610 and potholer54
aerobique 1 year ago
Could someone still prove catastrophic AGW for me? If there is no scientific proof for the theory, then only pure science dictates that it is supposed to be discardet.
I'm up for renewable energy, that is fantastic. What I'm for is for little more planning before we start pouring our money in.
Also, Mars? How does the possible weather extreme destroy our magnetic field? Any change of proving me that the weather has become more extreme?
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
prove? = look science, not lobbyists^
The feedbacks are very dangerous, but its nearly impossible to predict them 100% (also not usual to prove anything 100%..) - but they have "overwhelming" evidence and every respected scientific body on this planet agrees with that.
go NASA website for a mayor, if you dont trust ipcc anymore...
(thanks pr-campaigns, scandal-media and flat earth communitys..)
and watch greenman3610 and potholer54 videos - its fun
aerobique 1 year ago
I have tried to look. For now I have seen almost no proof of positive feedback effect from low clouds.
Without it, the Co2 temperature rise will only be around 0.5 degrees offer the next 100 years, just like in IPCC predictions.
PLEASE, instead of giving me the propahanda speech, point me to the peer-reviewed literature.
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
Finlandcitizen
Evidence?
/watch?v=5Pjbykd2ywU
cristop5 1 year ago
Read my question before you answer.
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
@Finlandcitizen I read your question but it was unclear.
Do you really want 'proof' of catastrophic AGW?! I mean do you want a forecast that is also 'proof'? I can't imagine such a thing - until we have time travel anyway.
The link I gave you outlines the body of evidence supporting AGW. Within that I could point you to papers addressing particular aspects of the phenomenon. Do you need to know for sure just how 'catastrophic' it might be? Is that it?
cristop5 1 year ago 2
Yes I believe in AGW, that has never been the question.
But I take more Roy Spencer and/or John Christy stance on the issue. So far the only evidence that the effecty will be catastrophic I have seen is the computer models in the IPPC Fourth Assestment report.
Can you provide me with evidence that would debunk Roy Spencer's papers on the low cloud effect? If we don't know facts as simple as low cloud reactions, then how we can hope to find how much feedback will there be.
I need evidence.
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
How gives a fuck what you need? Do some reasearch yourself...
9dissection9 1 year ago
Nice argument.
But, no evidence to support your believes, no real argument.
I have pointed out to Spencer's and Christy's peer-reviewed literature and unless someone can point me to evidence debunking for example Spencer's papers (mission were Real Climate's "Spencer's Folly" failed) then that leaves me to the conclusion of supporting Spencer's work wich would show that the warming will be around 0.5 degrees Kelvin in the next 100 years.
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
... Global Warming conference ...,
"650 of the world's top climatologists stood up and said man-made global warming is a media generated myth without basis. For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming?" -- Climatologist Dr. David Gee, Chairman of the International Geological Congress,
TheAntiLeft 2 years ago 2
@TheAntiLeft Agreed, then they'll change their stance and say that global cooling is a result of CO2. If the climate stabilises they'll say that CO2 causes it and humanity will become over-comfortable and over stability and over comfort will lead to the decay of civilization so a huge tax is necessary.
The fact is there is ZERO evidence of Anthropogenic Global Warming, I mean...they have not presented ONE SHRED OF PROOF!!! Amazing huh??!!
IndrasBlade77 2 years ago 2
What's more amazing, is the fact that the same nut-bags proselytizing their gospel of Thermal Armageddon (lest we shut down capitalism) are the SAME who endlessly chanted "Nuclear Winter" throughout the Cold War, attempting to shut down capitalism by having us surrender to communism.
Same socialist mystics; same goal; same Thermometer Gods; opposite end of the thermometer.
TheAntiLeft 2 years ago
"Same socialist mystics; same goal; same Thermometer Gods; opposite end of the thermometer."
The only way they can tell the difference between the oral thermometer and the rectal one is by the taste...
I hate those lying communist faggots... Stock up on shotshells and bullets... Might be a good idea to invest in black powder pistols as well...
SirWinstonChurchill 1 year ago
Morons. The lot of you. Al Gore can burn in hell.
whitetrashshogun 2 years ago
Algore is a pile of shit...
SirWinstonChurchill 1 year ago
Monckton is a fraud
brospec 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Monckton's comments on DDT show a remarkable combination of scientific illiteracy & outright lies & advocated construction of concentration camps for compulsory incarceration of all AIDS sufferers.
It is a sad reflection on our priorities that real scientists are ignored whilst charlatans such as Monckton (who is not even a Lord although he creatively refers to himself as a "peer of the House of Lords" ) set about engineering public opinion with pseudoscientific nonsense.
wildcrazygoats 2 years ago 3
wildcrazygoats - so true - Monckton is a total conartist.
brospec 2 years ago 3
He is the senior policy advisor for the SPPInstitute, , funded by ExxonMobil and alleges that climate change is a global communist conspiracy to impose a world government and he calls supporters of action on climate change Nazis & Hitler youth. His statements about climate change science reflect his scientific credentials at best they are mistaken , at worst straight out lies & fabrications.
wildcrazygoats 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why dont you be more specific? Tell us exactly why you believe he is mistaken.
scrollandkey 2 years ago
read his material... shill
God4Dunoon 2 years ago
Why are you calling me a shill? I'm with Lord Monckton on this issue.. man-made climate change is bullshit.
scrollandkey 2 years ago
Monckton is a total fraud : His scientific qualifications are a diploma in journalism studies and he was an advisor to the Thatcher government.. on the sale of council flats (he claims also to have been an advisor on warship hydrodynamics - amazing what a diploma in journalism studies qualifies you to do). He has also been an immigration consultant to some very dodgy companies............
wildcrazygoats 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And Al Gore invented the internet......
Ask yourself why Gore wont debate Monckton.
Why not?
If the case is so settled, so incontrivertible then whats to lose?
Face perhaps? Exposure to light is always the best disinfectant for liars.
watch?v=stij8sUybx0
Tacair1 2 years ago
"Ask yourself why Gore wont debate Monckton.
Why not?" (i) Why are you wanting a former politician & a dodgy former journalist to debate real science? Why are you not asking scientists? (ii) For the reason evolutionary biologists dont waste their time debating nutty creationists
wildcrazygoats 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@wildcrazygoats
Evolution is only possible with HETEROSEXUAL relationships, yet you stupid, uneducated homosexuals want to get married? You believe the same thing as the creationists - you all believe your weenies come from heaven.
SirWinstonChurchill 2 years ago
""Evolution is only possible with HETEROSEXUAL relationships, yet you stupid, uneducated homosexuals want to get married?"" ............. are you really that moronic?? (silly question - you are a follower of "Lord" Minckton - you obviously believe any inane bullshit) Evolution happens in all species , whether heterosexual or asexual. Try reading a high school science text I am not homosexual , idiot
wildcrazygoats 2 years ago
@wildcrazygoats You obviously believe in the nutbag psychic staring at goats CIA bullshit due to your name.
See what I did there? made an unsubstantiated fallacious association, which is exactly what you're doing, Monckton speaks about climate change, not evolution. You do realise that all the science is against man-made global warming don't you?
IndrasBlade77 2 years ago
I was replying to SirWinstonChurchill ' s post dickhead
wildcrazygoats 2 years ago
Read what I previoudsly wrote about Monckton - he is just a sleazy conman , funded by Exxon
wildcrazygoats 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gores inconvenient truth.
$250,000 shares in Occidental oil.
So whats to lose then? Gore debates Monckton and shows his superior argument.
Then itd be story over wouldnt it?
But you and he wont have that debate cos your arguments a fairy story.
You throw the big oil insult around as though that means a thing- it dosent! but your mans a bigger sleaze bag by some margin.
Gore? You align yourself with that fuckwit and you deserve what you surely will get.
Talk about blind as...
Tacair1 2 years ago
I concur.
LtSurge659 2 years ago 3
GIM appears to have considerable influence over the major carbon-credit trading firms that currently exist: the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) in the U.S. and the Carbon Neutral Company (CNC) in Great Britain. CCX is the only firm in the U.S. that claims to trade carbon credits.
Flee144 2 years ago
Al Gore is chairman and founder of a private equity firm called Generation Investment Management (GIM). According to Gore, the London-based firm invests money from institutions and wealthy investors in companies that are going green. Generation Investment Management, purchases -- but isnt a provider of -- carbon dioxide offsets, said spokesman Richard Campbell in a March 7 report by CNSNews.
Flee144 2 years ago
Comment removed
ERROLCUSTERFLYNN4EVR 2 years ago
Comment removed
ERROLCUSTERFLYNN4EVR 6 months ago
Comment removed
ERROLCUSTERFLYNN4EVR 6 months ago
Comment removed
ERROLCUSTERFLYNN4EVR 6 months ago
Comment removed
ERROLCUSTERFLYNN4EVR 6 months ago
carbon = more food I like food
Reptilianmuseum 2 years ago
That's about the stupidest comment by a uneducated scientifically illiterate conservative so far.
It is similar to a resident saying, "More water = more to drink" before Hurricane Katrina flooded the city and drowned him.
Conservatives love toxins, pollution and cancer. Conservatives love death, war and destruction.
Conservatives are anti-life, anti-peace, anti-justice and anti-God.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Still does not change the fact that the scientists got caught cooking the data to match the theory when they are supposed to change the theory to match the data.
onetruegodofabraham 2 years ago
YES MY LORD!
RepublicanNatio 2 years ago
You can argue the charts and graphs all day long. In my opinion, the leaked emails effectively sawed off one of the legs of this three legged stool called "man made climate change".
onetruegodofabraham 2 years ago
Conservatives cling to climategate with the same desperation as creationists cling to the Piltdown Man hoax.
Conservatives simply cannot handle reality or life in the 21st century.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
You can divert and throw mud all day long. It will not change the fact that "man made climate change" is an apparition.
onetruegodofabraham 2 years ago 3
An apparition is a religious manifestation. Perhaps you were looking for some other word?
dmathew1024 2 years ago
yea, 'myth' works better
onetruegodofabraham 2 years ago
i feel sorry for the reporter i think he could have a stutter or hes really nervous
charlienethercoat094 2 years ago
its true the so called scientists have cooked the books. thats why they call it 'climate change' and not 'global warming' now.
there are too many discrepencies in the data to form a definite conclusion. also the peer review process is massively corrupted , so it is therefore not science. heads need to roll, and im getting a new axe for christmas.
boptah 2 years ago 2
It is called "climate change" because that is a more accurate term than "global warming". Climate change indicates that the impacts will vary from place to place according to unique local circumstances in accordance with the climates' complexity.
Of course, conservatives are too stupid to do complex. Conservatives are too uneducated to comprehend science. Conservatives aren't intelligent enough to evaluate risk.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
@dmathew1024 question/ 'does increased co2 levels in the atmosphere contribute to global warming due to the greenhouse effect'.
answer/ obviously not.
also. if you put food in the oven ALL of the food gets hotter, not just some of the food no matter how 'complex' the food is.
thats why the so called scientists are lying , because their whole reputation has been shattered. due to the fact that the planet is getting colder. lol
boptah 2 years ago
Carbon dioxide's role as a greenhouse gas was scientifically established back in the 19th century ... but it is evident that your mind is stuck back in the Dark Ages with ignorance and superstition guiding your pollution-love.
Are conservatives really so stupid and gullible as the conservatives here? It is a sad comment on the Republican party that all it has left are people like you.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
1/ increased co2 follows global warming, not the other way round.
2/ i'm not a conservative or republican, nor do i live in the us. political parties ,religions (incl science) and all ideologies are corrupted by degree.
3/. i would like fries with my burger (easy on the mayo)
boptah 2 years ago
1. You are engaged in a losing argument with the laws of physics which you cannot possibly win, regardless of your scientific illiteracy.
2. What nation do you live in which allows a person to sound so much like a dittohead drone idiot?
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Comment removed
Flee144 2 years ago
Bopah ... your comments reveal your own extraordinary ignorance and scientific illiteracy and nothing else. Please educate yourself.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
I have no doudt, this person is Paid by Al gore!! lol
Flee144 2 years ago
great article on Lord Monckton: / tinyurl . com / yznv 3br
wfmk8 2 years ago
Great article on Christopher Monckton:
ht tp : / / tinyurl . com / yznv 3br
acidgawd999 2 years ago
It's so good to see so many people starting to wake up to smell the bs... It truly is a religion, this whole global warming thing... And like the church, the preachers are the ones to gain from this religion...
cloud1232006 2 years ago 6
Believers in man-made warming of Planet Earth are akin to fanatical religious zealots.
Noden793 2 years ago 5
Not by CO2, but it is partly man-made...by those who want the taxes and who are fighting now in Copenhagen to get it thrue! HAARP, the whole world full of CHEMTRAILS; that is changing the climate. Ofcourseabove all, there is the fact of activity of the Sun.
karatekla 2 years ago
dmathew1024 is a perfect example of why people are starting to question the religion of global warming. Try and even have a discussion and immediately these liberal tards revert back to childish name calling. It is all so shamefully sad.
capatilist 2 years ago 6
"Capatilist" doesn't know science but he sure knows stupid.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
dmathew1024 wanted me to let you all know that the science regarding string theory has been settled for 20 years, and anyone who brings it up loves Sarah Palin for some reason.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Well I think by virtue of the fact that you are English, you sort of become British involuntarily, especially if you still have your citizenship.
bobdole57 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am English, not British (they are the conquered people) and any tongue that confesses my angelic language (including your own ignorant self) has conceded defeat.
Perhaps you should become a little more educated before any further asinine commentary?
SirWinstonChurchill 2 years ago
Well I didn't know you were going to take it like that, sorry.
bobdole57 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@bobdole57
You still don't understand the privilege of nobility... The trouble we have is that you commoners don't understand warfare (Lord Monckton does). Commoners have usurped the seats of their sovereigns in the world, making not only yourselves subject to conquest, but also those of us in the nobility.
Unless we crown a king who the young men would wager their lives to follow (one of our own younger princes among us), this will be our undoing in many, many ways - kill the lawyers.
SirWinstonChurchill 2 years ago
Don't you mean Shill?
bobdole57 2 years ago
Poor Bob Dole continues to spout off nonsense after having ended the argument by irrationally invoking Godwin's Law.
Sarah Palin loves you, Bob Dole!
She might not dream about you although you spend all your time dreaming about her, though.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
haha, I don't know about you, but I am enjoying this. You Hitler-esque nazi.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Bob Dole cannot let go his violation of Godwin's Law.
Such is the pathetic fate of high school dropout conservatives.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Woe is me. I feel like such a pathetic loser. I feel like such a murderer of all those poor polar bears.
It makes me want to toss my Master's in Computer Science in the Eco-friendly recycling bin.
bobdole57 2 years ago
ZOMFG!
dmathew1024 thinks he won an argument with me by being a complete and utter fool! HAHA LOLZ.
Read what dmathew1024 says you ecomentalists. Read it and learn.
The Nazi-Moron-Enviro Army is recruiting.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Bob Dole invokes Godwin's Law ... he is such a pathetic uneducated loser.
Should have finished high school, Bob Dole.
Sarah Palin winks at you!
dmathew1024 2 years ago
You can't actually invoke a law. Godwin's Law is just that, a social law. The longer you and I argue, the more likely you are to show how much of a Nazi you are. That is all.
bobdole57 2 years ago
My god you are such an uneducated boob. I never did like to have youtube arguments with people in asylums.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Its really too bad I spend the majority of my time doing core XNU kernel development so idiots like you have the ability to go on youtube and find children to rape.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Poor Bob Dole ... puffing up his resume after he has conclusively demonstrated that he is an unecucated conservative idiot who irrationally invokes Godwin's Law because he is just too stupid and too emotional to know any better.
Sarah Palin loves you, Bob Dole!
dmathew1024 2 years ago
What an utterly wasted over-educated life i have led. Damn you God, why?
bobdole57 2 years ago
If only I had become a street musician or a global warming theologian , then I would have a life worth living.
Or even if I could become a middle-aged buffoon on welfare who has nothing better to do than post comments about Earth, our Mother on youtube videos,
bobdole57 2 years ago
Bob Dole's an old buffoon who has nothing better to do than post comments on YouTube.
Poor Bob Dole ... being an uneducated idiot must really suck. Have you thought about jumping in front of a bus? Yes, I know you have!
Sarah Palin loves Bob Dole! wink, wink ...
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Poor dmathew1024
Free yourself from your human-guilt. Confess your sins. I know you want to.
Don't you want to live a life without guilt, a life without fear of some sort of God? A life where you can do and act how you feel without being constrained to a perverted set of Al Gore's 'values.'
Come in to the light. This is your chance.
Come and live your own life.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Bob Dole failed in his science argument and now he wants to become a preacher. He's a good conservative preacher, that Bob Dole, he reminds me of Ted Haggard.
Sarah Palin loves Bob Dole ... wink, wink, wink!
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Who's the preacher, I'm still trying the science argument. A scientist might have to resort to some touchy-feely stuff when arguing with a moronic enviro-theologian though.
bobdole57 2 years ago
You are still trying to argue science although you aren't intelligent or informed enough to engage in a scientific argument.
Sarah Palin loves you, Bob Dole ... wink, wink, wink!
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Lolz. Moron.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Get off Mommy's computer before you get in trouble laddy.
bobdole57 2 years ago
Bob Dole's suffered a complete mental breakdown.
Poor Bob Dole ... Sarah Palin still loves you!
dmathew1024 2 years ago
You hurt my feelings
bobdole57 2 years ago
Well, Bob Dole, we can keep on going back and forth like this for a hundred years if you like ...
That is, if you have nothing better to do, which (of course) you don't ...
You've already lost this argument. You might as well go to bed old man. You'll feel better tomorrow ... Rush Limbaugh is on at noon.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
I'm not actually and old man, and I, unlike you have the gift of understanding sarcasm
bobdole57 2 years ago
You have the gift of understanding sarcasm?
Well, at least you have one gift ...
Better go to bed old man. Rush Limbaugh will be on tomorrow and he'll tell you everything is ok. You'll believe him, too.
Sarah Palin still loves you ... wink, wink wink!
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Annoying is what you are. STFU
RufuZzz0 2 years ago
Uneducated scientifically illiterate is what you are ... and a dittohead drone to boot. Must be fun being so stupid.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Well I don't see any reason to troll on YouTube to show off my academic superiority, it's a very immature thing. I suppose it would also be very naive to base one's level of education with the information found here, wouldn't you agree?
And as I implied earlier kid, your stuck-up attitude and Sara Palin-shit is definitely annoying.
RufuZzz0 2 years ago
youtube represents the thing your side has always feared, honest debate and a free and open press
it was pretty easy to win debates, when you controlled the media, controlled the schools, controlled the history books, and controlled the colleges
but with FOX news and youtube, you no longer have a monopoly on wide dissemination of information
in fact, its kinda embarrassing for your side, that even with that much propaganda power, you only could convince half the people
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
If you think that Fox and YouTube represent "wide dissemination of information" I've got a Nigerian friend with a million dollars to give to you ...
Really, are you so dense as to believe any fool you hear on television, radio and Youtube?
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Believe anyone? No, of course not, but, if someone says, check these 3 scientific reports for evidence that disprove greenhouse warming as the primary force increasing temperature, I can then check it
I mean, you look at Roy Spencers work, that proves that clouds actually are negative feedback, not positive as the IPCC says. You look at Richard Lindzen, and the data coming from the Earth Energy Budget Satellite, which proves that greenhouse gases have very little effect on recent temp increase
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
this is info that should be on every television station, I only heard about it through youtube
You hear about Van Jones saying that the Green Movement is an effective way to implement socialism in America, only heard about it on FOX
And they didn't distort what he said, cause it wasn't a sound bite, it was several minutes of uncut speech, to establish the context of what he was saying
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
this, and dozens of other stories completely ignored by most media outlets, like the bio fuels scam driving up food prices causing food riots in the 3rd world, caused by YOUR blind belief in global warming
FOX and Youtube are the only ones telling us the news, so yes, they constitute open and free information
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
oh, and when can that Nigerian friend get that check in the mail?
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
Now you are worried about biofuels and hunger in the Third World? Good.
I'm opposed to biofuels. They were a mistake to begin with and they were promoted by agricultural corporations, not environmentalists.
Also, they were not meant to solve the global warming problem. No, they were meant to solve the oil importation problem.
But you would know these things if you were educated and informed and not some dupe with believes every lie spread by Fox News.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Van Jones ... the socialist bogeyman ... you really are a dupe. The most stupid uninformed people rely upon Fox News for their daily dose of propaganda and conspiracy theory BS.
You really need to educate yourself because otherwise you are going to remain an easily manipulated dupe.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
You are gullible enough to believe the lies of cranks and oil industry shills. You might as well be a young earth creationist if you standards of proof are so very low.
Scientifically illiterate people rank among the most easily manipulated dupes on the planet. If you people hear a lie often enough soon enough it sounds like God's own truth.
Please do find better authorities than these liars.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
So, your argument, is name calling? Wow, demonstrating the debating skill of a 3rd grader, very nice. In no way does this prove my point of, you guys can only debate when you control all dissemination of information
But ok, I'm game, I'll weed through your inane babble, and pull out a few points
research biofuels, one of the "advantages" is they have less emissions, particles, CO2, etc
Van Jones. Are saying he didn't believe these things? if so, why is he gone?
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
Find better authorities, sorry, not gonna happen. I don't look for "authorities". An argument from authority is not a valid argument. You argue the science in a scientific debate.
If you don't know the science, stay out of the debate.
Second, the people I cited do not take Oil money, they are paid via the Universities they research at. And even if they did take Oil money, it would make no difference
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
How they get funded doesnt change the measurements they have, cause unlike the IPCC, they actually have measured data
Richard Lindzen, using satellites to measure how much heat is radiating off the earth out into space, and charting against the temp you're all worried about. He found, that as temps go up, more energy escapes into space
Explain how that works, if temps go up, and more energy is escaping into space, well then that energy isnt being trapped down here causing global warming is it?
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
"Unlike the IPCC, they actually have measured data ... "
Are you really so stupid? The IPCC report is thousands of pages long and it references thousands of peer reviewed scientific articles, all of which are based upon their own mountain of measured data.
By qouting Richard Lindzen as if he is God rather than an oil-soaked lobbyist for polluting industries you reveal yourself as the gullible sort of dupe.
Read a book. Stop listening to liars.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
You lie when you say that the people you cite don't take oil money. The oil money flowing through the denialism movement is as well documented as the tabacco money which sustained tha anti-medical science movement against classifying nicotine as addictive.
The fact that you are an easily manipulated dupe doesn't change the reality of science.
Stop living in the 19th century. You are fighting a battle which you lost a long time ago.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
You write in an incoherent manner. Perhaps you should rewrte your entire Van Jones screed so that I might actually make sense of your argument.
But I know that dittohead drones find it difficult to write anything intelligent because they lack an education and receive their talking points from blowhards.
Read a book. Become an informed American. Stop being a dupe.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
I think that's exactly what we are talking about. Anyone gullible enough to believe this blindly is well..."easily manipulated dupes"
capatilist 2 years ago 2
Capatilist ... did you intentionally mispell "capitalist" or are you one of those uneducated people who are too stupid to comprehend science and too unintelligent to know any better?
dmathew1024 2 years ago
wow, all the name calling really makes your point clear;
"When the science is on your side, you argue the science, when its not, you shoot the messenger"
You realize this is the reason why the people you support refuse to debate our side right?
I have yet to see a scientist Vs scientist debate, lets gather ALL THIS EVIDENCE, and have it out, public debate, aired un-cut on all news channels
a 5 hour debate, lets hash this out, and see who comes out on top
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
and where is this Oil money you speak of?
How would you even know? and Further, why does it matter? Tell me where their assertions don't match the data
Roy Spencer always makes his data open and available. Lindzen makes his data open and available. How come there are standing FIOA requests on the data the IPCC relies on? How come its not an open process?
And I'm not talking about the graphs
raw data -> Computer Program -> Graph
Why can't we get a hold of the raw data?
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
You don't want the raw data. You aren't educated enough to comprehend it much less interpret it.
Roy Spencer and Richard Lindzen are known oil industry shills and their money motive is well known and objectively verified.
Educate yourself and you'll avoid sounding like a scientifically illiterate dupe in the future.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
You're right, I would have no use for the raw data, but I still want it public
That way, its an open process. And two different graphs are produced from the same raw data, we know we have to look at the computer programs processing the data, to find out who is wrong, or who is distorting
Surely you're not going to argue against transparency and accountability?
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
You are not in favor of transparency and accountability. The raw data has always been available to those who really wanted to find it ... those pesky oil lobbyists demanding for the raw data weren't asking in good faith.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Who gets to decide whos asking in good faith?
The raw data for one of the temp sets resided in the US, there was a FIOA request, and suddenly the data was moved over to Europe
The raw data in NASAs possession, is also under a FIOA request, which they have been evading ever since
The raw data from east anglia has been under a FIOA request for years, with those e-mails being revealed, the request was stepped up to, "we're not asking". Now we find out the data was deleted, whoops!
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
Now, there is no way to verify the data from anglia, any report that relies heavily on that data set, needs to be voided
And to make sure this is not happening else where, all the raw data from the 5 primary data sets, minus the one from anglia, needs to be made public, pure and simple. Made available to scientist, engineers, Oil Mogols, Drug lords, Politicians, Lawyers, everyone. Every single person in the world, should have access to this
This is climate data, not state secrets
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
Have you read the IPCC report? Until you read the IPCC report I am going to have to assume that you are a brain-dead dittohead drone who really isn't interested in actual scientific knowledge.
There are over 100,000 pages of publish scientific findings in regard to the climate over the last several decades. If you remain ignorant it is your own fault.
Stop being a dupe.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
The oil industry shills demanding the raw data aren't asking in good faith. That much is certain.
Are you a creationist? You sound like a creationist.
dmathew1024 2 years ago
Why is faith required to participate in science?
LordVigeous666999 2 years ago
Come on, Lord Vigeous, are you stupid or just plain conservative?
Faith is not required to participate i