I'm about to tell my mom, dad, sister, grandma, grandpa, aunts and uncles about the Referral Code: FTUS600 at full tilt poker to get then their 600 dollar sign up bonus
phil's just terrible.....then and now.....on one hand ( 4 handed poker mind you) he mucks 10-10 preflop....and the next hand he calls 2 all ins preflop with A-10...in both caes an experienced player woudl have done just the opposite.....shove the 10's and muck the A-10 pre-flop
@jac4565 Not sure... The format means that folding 10s when you are at risk might increase your equity in prize money (someone might get knocked out, and you won't) even if you might be ahead. In addition, a short stacked player would be going all in on a lot of hands etc etc. It all depends on chipstack sizes, but we have no information about that here.
Lmao... Allright I am going to hook ya up my full tilt name = viedee6840 :)
And its official
Ya might have heard players talking on their FB wall about how you can now sign up using the code SPECIALS @ Full Tilt Pokers website.
It really is a great promotional deal. Your first deposit will be DOUBLED + a few other awesome perks. Its only gonna work for the first 4500 people that sign up using it
because if a queen or 10 came out on the river phils 9's would have been counterfeited and johhny would win with his ace kicker, and if jack came out on the river johhny would have gotten ace high straight,
@Babakandy But had a king come up on the River, Chan would have had Trip Kings with an Ace but Hellmuth would have had a Full House; Kings over Nines.
@NeoSilvanus Becuz hold em is a game of the best 5 cards... u play the board as well .. phill had a pair of 9's in the hole (pocket 9's) Chan had A-7 the board came K K 10 now hellmuth has 9's and Kings. if the turn woulda came another 10 chan would take the lead becuz he would have had King's and 10's with an A kicker.. hellmuth would THEN have Kings and 10's with a 9 kicker (his pair of 9's couldnt beat the board, therefore hes playing the board" if the river woulda came a Queen same scenario
2 people all in and he calls with A10? I know you have to get your chips in and get a proper stack to be heads up and with a chance of winning, but that is ridiculous - if anyone did that to him today he'd blow up! :)
just goes to show that even back then it was a game of luck. Absolutely ZERO skill involved with Helmuth calling two all-in bets with A,10....what could he possibly be ahead of? Without that lucky 3 outer Ace he probably never becomes a Main Event Champion.
@valdez87 that's bullshit, saying anything to criticize Hellmuth. The pocket 2 raised all in first and Phil called which is just normal with AT facing a short stack. The 3rd guy came in for 160k more in a pot of over 500k in total, obviously he had to call donkey
@MJDangerous Okay, now you've explained the exact play, it makes more sense... and it's short-handed too (right?) so fair enough.
Still, poker was different then than it is today... and Phil would have a thing or two to say about anyone doing this to him if he had 10 10 and got called by A10 and they sucked out :P that was my point is all...
@valdez87 at the final table you want to play all aces especially A10 being a viable hand, Hellmuth with the insta call probably thought they were weak
Ephedra and Ephedrine diet pills are scientifically proven to melt fat and raise metabolism without diet or exercise.
Xenadrine RFA-1, Metabolife 356, Hydroxycut, Metabolift, and more.
HEAT SCA Stack will give you the strong stimulant effect of pharmaceutical grade diets. Contains also Cayenne Pepper, the secret ingredient Beyonce used for her role in "Dreamgirls." It is all natural and will not give you the side effects of the pharmaceutical ones. Click on my name above.
@jbm2005 The guy almost won it three times in a row. No one's ever done that. Yeah, he's pretty good. You don't hear much from him anymore because he's kicking ass in cash games.
I'm not even a Chan fanboy, but denying his skill is just dumb.
most of the top house hold names in poker these days are far better players than Phil in my opinion but all of them havent bought into every NLH wsop tornement for the past 30+ years so havent got as many braclets.
LOL "I was suprised when he rolled over ace ten of spades". Meanwhile Phil was all in on a 3 way pot with A7 and got very lucky to spike an ace on the flop. Phil always amazes me with his inability to see when he gets very lucky, and his child-like behavior when he loses against an "inferior" hand.
phil was second in chips, he had about 25 BBs behind if he loses. Plus he is suited and gives himself a chance to go straight to heads up play. What this video dosn't show is the initial raise, lott was in the big blind and re-raised when in came around. Phil is gettin about 2.5 to 1.
Imagine if Helmuth had pocket T's losing against AT....
"He called a raise with Ace (beep) Ten (beep) (beep). Can't (beep) believe this. This is unreal, (beep) incredible. This are the worst (beep) players in the world. I guess if luck weren't involved I'd win every hand. "
That was a surprisingly loose call from Chan. I'm sure he thought he could out play Phil so it seems strange that he would call off all his money pre flop with that hand.
Phil has 11 bracelets Chan has 10 and Stuey has 5. Three of Sty's bracelets were in the main event. He played the main event 3 times and won all 3. Some people thought he was clairvoyant and many believe he was the greatest poker player to have ever played.
Its bullshit when the commentators say when Chan and Hellmuth are allin Chan A 7, Phil 9 9 .. flop k 10 k, turn Q.. commentators say that any card over a 10 wins the pot to Chan. Lol NO!!!! Only a 10, J, Q or an Ace would help Chan.
Don't get me wrong, Chan fully deserved to be considered legendary in '89. It just amazed me that even twenty years ago he was already one of the greats!
back then poker was played very differently.. they didn't have all the books they do now.. people didn't understand the odds like they do now(thx to computers) poker was a gamblers game back then.. just like every other game and sport.. it evolved into what it is today....
they still had stragerty and new the odds but maybe not percantages. johnny chan was two time winner allready. also hellmuth said after he won this that he knew he was a 2-1 favourite when he went all in against chan, so there was stratergie but your right it is alot easier to find information and the different percantages.
No, he didn't. Hellmuth moved all in first with the aces and Dwan made the call with the tens. When Hellmuth won this tournament, he made the move first with his nines.
what the hell are you talking about A7??? bad call by chan , i dont know what kind of odds he was getting but he could have made history if he didnt donk of the tournament here, imagine 3peat
even still he had to figure he was a dog, i dont know what percentage of his stack was already in there, but when hellmouth 3 bet it he had to of known he was at least a 2 to 1 dog or worse!
Overall I think it was the right play especially since he has the chance to knock off 2 players AND it looks like he still has ALOT of chips to play with if his hand does not win (looks like he would have had about 500k left, and this was about a 600k pot)
Wow some of you jumping down Phil's throat for calling All-in with ATs have no concept of poker odds... For starters we have no indication of the blinds or antes at this stage nor do we know the chip counts but it looks like at the begining of the hand Phil had both players well covered. First Chan folds then a short-stacked player shoves for 83k in chips.
Easy call for phil since the range of this player who is pushing is enormous, he could very well be up against a rag ace, small pair or even any 2 cards like QJ.
Furthermore there is only one player left to act behind hellmuth so the chances that there are any more decisions left to make in this hand are small. Easy call.
Now unfortunately the last player did in fact move in for 163k more on top of the 83k so now it's time to do a little math:
if he is up against a small pair and a overpair to the 10 (like KK, QQ also likely since the last player to move in seems pretty solid from what we've seen) he wins: 29% he's not in bad shape and getting almost the odds to call here
The only situation where he is crushed and it's a terrible call is if the opponent last to move in is holding AA which is unlikely since he is himself holding an ace.
Just a correction he is getting actually MORE than the odds to call even against a player holding KK or QQ and assuming the other player has an underpair.
there was 249k in the pot before the second player re-raised 163k more total.
It is back to hellmuth who needs to call 163k into a pot that now contains 413k.
He is getting almost 3 to 1 on his money WITHOUT even considering the blinds or antes. This means he only needs to win roughly 25% of the time to make this call profitable. There is a bit more to it considering the side pot but we will keep it simple...
Knocking out two players with A10 offsuit was just plain lucky. POKER BRAT had only 3 outs. I can't believe he called two all-ins with that hand. He was very likely to be dominated (AK AQ AJ AA 1010). Stupid stupid play.
1st of all, you're kidding yourself if you think every player even in this tourney was a pro. Probably a higher % of them were, but there were probably some hi roller whales and amateurs as well.
2nd, you missed the point. I wasn't comparing myself to Hellmuth. The point was, there are FAR fewer hard decisions to be made and far less luck needed to win a 178-man tourney than to even cash in a 5,000+ tourney.
Sure he won back then, but it's not as impressive as it is now.
So what you are saying is that winning a tournament that involves a lot more luck is a bigger accomplishment than a tournament that requires a lot more skill?
Way to start out sounding like an idiot, then re-posting to prove that you are.
Yeah sure, that's what I'm saying, all you need is a boatload of luck to win a 7,000+ tourney.
Winning a 2-day tourney as opposed to winning a weeklong+ tourney now? Yeah forget stamina and good decision making for triple the amount of time, all you need now is a truckload of luck. That's exactly what I said all right.
Try taking a reading comprehension course sometime. You need it.
i doubt it had the offensive connotations it does now 20 years ago, and also if you listen to the announcer he's definitely not using it in any kind of offensive or derogatory way - its clear he has a great deal of genuine respect for the player just from his commentary.
The voice of Helmuth didnt change in all the years, i hat his voice
Rodario10 3 weeks ago
Honey, I called two all in's with A10... I can't even spell poker... I'm an idiot from Wisconsin...
Porian79 1 month ago 2
@Porian79 to think that this is what made the fortune of this donk, its appalling... what a donk call
ihaveguts 1 month ago
props to the commentor " johnny chan the two time defending champ thanks for stopping by"" LMAO doesnt get any better than that kids
iheartsamsam 1 month ago
Commentator says Johnny will win with any card higher than a ten. Phill could still win with a King, hehe. :)
TheInadequacy 2 months ago
@TheInadequacy i know, its like he was thinking about Hi/Lo or something.
moona178 2 months ago
@TheInadequacy true, i noticed that too
ihaveguts 1 month ago
Chan was sick back to back then headsup at the final table the next year!!
foolioperez 5 months ago in playlist World Series Of Poker
he seems so nice. when did he turn into a complete dick. 97?
boolz 6 months ago 3
Hellmuth only says: FUCK.. OH SHIT... YOU ARE A IDIOT... FUCK YOU...
luxinqikkk 8 months ago
Johnny Chan was one hand away from a three-peat. What a beast!
jimmychauv 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OVER $1000 OF FREEROLLS A DAY ON HIGH PULSE POKER
JOIN TODAY USING CODE POKERCHIPS
~~~NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED~~~
champions20000009 9 months ago
over the top with 22 what a donk! how'd he even make it that far?
BurnYourCash 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Full_Tilt_Poker-accepts_USA_players_for_real_money_deposits_and_when_you_sign_up_with_Referral_Code:FTUS600_you_get_a_600$_bonus
robertdiane80 10 months ago
all these string bets and "call and raise" lingo is tilting me
jayisthebest88 10 months ago 6
@jayisthebest88 they weren't string bets. the players said raise you just can't hear the audio that well. T
MrLothario2000 4 months ago
Yeah those sites are rigged that is why they are shutting them down.
Graham6762 10 months ago
Man these rigged sites should be banned!!
johnsmith7490 10 months ago
Nice Overcall with A10. Never hear him talk about how that suckout helped him win the main event.
DevinDerga 10 months ago
imagen if the A hit. "He called all in with A7 honey!"
kluxxxarn 10 months ago
@kluxxxarn
LOL.
StreetsOfSonic 9 months ago
how is that johny speak much fluent english back then?? :P
redhidus 11 months ago
@redhidus how is that i saw this comment in other part of this??
PonasMiagis 9 months ago
i wanna go back in time and play ... the tables used to be so soft if greenstein the knit jew got rich anybody coulda done it
AugiTheGreat1 11 months ago
@AugiTheGreat1 Sure ... go ahead and do it then.
luismendezs 6 months ago
@luismendezs i would if i could Mr Troll Yup Yup
AugiTheGreat1 6 months ago
@AugiTheGreat1 dont think you'd last for long if youd try to make a living out of poker. just my 10 cents. and the 2 are free.
luismendezs 6 months ago
@luismendezs ive been playing poker for a living since 2008 so yeah keep trolling bud
AugiTheGreat1 6 months ago
@AugiTheGreat1 sure you do.
luismendezs 6 months ago
Full_Tilt_Poker_accepts-USA_players_for_real_money_deposits_and_when_you_sign_up_with_Referral_Code:FTUS600_you_get_a_600$_bonus
audreycarl59 11 months ago
Using_Referral_Code:FTUS600_at_account-sign_up_with_Full_Tilt_Poker_gets_you_a_600$_bonus
54anderson5845 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When_creating_a_new_account_at_Full_Tilt_Poker_use_the_Referral_Code:FTUS600_for_a_600$_sign_up-bonus
95tomlinsonlindsey95 11 months ago
if a J comes..Makes Phil a str8 & K make him a boat....only a Q,10, or A saves Johnny
eliteballerz25 11 months ago
@eliteballerz25 a J makes chan a straight too genious
Zao911 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm about to tell my mom, dad, sister, grandma, grandpa, aunts and uncles about the Referral Code: FTUS600 at full tilt poker to get then their 600 dollar sign up bonus
elnoraswainthomp 11 months ago
-Fuk ya webcam poker is here man pokerview is the best thing ever.
johnsmith7490 1 year ago
Comment removed
Reckin007 1 year ago
there couldnt have anymore luck involved in the final table.
justinharker 1 year ago
phil's just terrible.....then and now.....on one hand ( 4 handed poker mind you) he mucks 10-10 preflop....and the next hand he calls 2 all ins preflop with A-10...in both caes an experienced player woudl have done just the opposite.....shove the 10's and muck the A-10 pre-flop
jac4565 1 year ago
@jac4565 Not sure... The format means that folding 10s when you are at risk might increase your equity in prize money (someone might get knocked out, and you won't) even if you might be ahead. In addition, a short stacked player would be going all in on a lot of hands etc etc. It all depends on chipstack sizes, but we have no information about that here.
watergun7 1 year ago
@timcro7789
Lmao... Allright I am going to hook ya up my full tilt name = viedee6840 :)
And its official
Ya might have heard players talking on their FB wall about how you can now sign up using the code SPECIALS @ Full Tilt Pokers website.
It really is a great promotional deal. Your first deposit will be DOUBLED + a few other awesome perks. Its only gonna work for the first 4500 people that sign up using it
NegreanuDan84 1 year ago
@NegreanuDan84 stop spamming u faggot
andytomas07 1 year ago
My mom plays ma jong and is a good friend of chans older brother.
Chipexcess 1 year ago
It's just not the same without hearing Norman Chad call this final table.
Johnny Chan seemed so intense back then. He seems really mellow now.
It's also funny to look back on this, and see how little chips were on the table compared to how many there are on the final table these days
GialloHorror 1 year ago
Just remember: 750.000 dollars was a heckload of money back than..
MrImpossible 1 year ago
Full Tilt Poker accepts USA players for real money deposits and when you sign up with Referral Code: FTUS600 you get a 600$ bonus
mlm4036 1 year ago
I love how the commentator pointed out that Hellmuth won it on the last hand.
JackSprat2323 1 year ago
a young phil, before all the shit talking started :)
HateClips 1 year ago
im so confused on the winning hand, Phil had a pair of 9's and pair of 10s (two pair), why does he need a low card?
Johhny had a pair of 10s with ace kicker which loses unless he gets an Ace. how can a low card with one pair give him a win.???
NeoSilvanus 1 year ago
Comment removed
Flux247 1 year ago
@Flux247 He had Kings and Nines with Ten kicker... dunce
FortyOzSwilla 1 year ago
@NeoSilvanus
because if a queen or 10 came out on the river phils 9's would have been counterfeited and johhny would win with his ace kicker, and if jack came out on the river johhny would have gotten ace high straight,
Babakandy 1 year ago
@Babakandy But had a king come up on the River, Chan would have had Trip Kings with an Ace but Hellmuth would have had a Full House; Kings over Nines.
juan833blue 1 year ago
@NeoSilvanus Becuz hold em is a game of the best 5 cards... u play the board as well .. phill had a pair of 9's in the hole (pocket 9's) Chan had A-7 the board came K K 10 now hellmuth has 9's and Kings. if the turn woulda came another 10 chan would take the lead becuz he would have had King's and 10's with an A kicker.. hellmuth would THEN have Kings and 10's with a 9 kicker (his pair of 9's couldnt beat the board, therefore hes playing the board" if the river woulda came a Queen same scenario
Element1516 1 year ago
A77 A BIG DRAW lol its like the driest flop
patatepowa 1 year ago
@patatepowa
Commentator means he drew a big flop; i.e hit a big flop.
pigeonkid4 1 year ago
I'd like to replace Zewin with an older Hellmuth. The young Hellmuth wouldn't know what to do with all the abuse he would be taking.
Herv3 1 year ago
i like hellmuth more than chan... both are great though!!
tibb5235 1 year ago
He was a 3:2 dog? Maybe that's why Jonny doesn't make any more final tables. He doesn't even know the odds. He was more like a 2:1 dog
jeromerome6 1 year ago
2 people all in and he calls with A10? I know you have to get your chips in and get a proper stack to be heads up and with a chance of winning, but that is ridiculous - if anyone did that to him today he'd blow up! :)
valdez87 1 year ago 9
@valdez87
just goes to show that even back then it was a game of luck. Absolutely ZERO skill involved with Helmuth calling two all-in bets with A,10....what could he possibly be ahead of? Without that lucky 3 outer Ace he probably never becomes a Main Event Champion.
easymoney7007 1 year ago
@valdez87 that's bullshit, saying anything to criticize Hellmuth. The pocket 2 raised all in first and Phil called which is just normal with AT facing a short stack. The 3rd guy came in for 160k more in a pot of over 500k in total, obviously he had to call donkey
MJDangerous 3 months ago
@MJDangerous Okay, now you've explained the exact play, it makes more sense... and it's short-handed too (right?) so fair enough.
Still, poker was different then than it is today... and Phil would have a thing or two to say about anyone doing this to him if he had 10 10 and got called by A10 and they sucked out :P that was my point is all...
valdez87 3 months ago
Comment removed
cdubmeyer 1 month ago
@valdez87 that is a very great hand three way and more so heads up
cdubmeyer 1 month ago
@valdez87 and also that dude with the 2's was going to go allin anyway with probably anything, he was shortstacked.
cdubmeyer 1 month ago
@valdez87 ya, but people used to be terrible. If you or I played 10 events a year we'd probably win one. LOL
ilovebrandnewcarpets 1 month ago
@valdez87 at the final table you want to play all aces especially A10 being a viable hand, Hellmuth with the insta call probably thought they were weak
Jbcartman 1 month ago
a big draw for hellmuth he has aces and sevens lol i thought he flopped like a flush draw or w/e...poker has changed a lot i guess
jibbers0 1 year ago
this phil hellmuth is a real doucher.
scotty1879 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ephedra and Ephedrine diet pills are scientifically proven to melt fat and raise metabolism without diet or exercise.
Xenadrine RFA-1, Metabolife 356, Hydroxycut, Metabolift, and more.
HEAT SCA Stack will give you the strong stimulant effect of pharmaceutical grade diets. Contains also Cayenne Pepper, the secret ingredient Beyonce used for her role in "Dreamgirls." It is all natural and will not give you the side effects of the pharmaceutical ones. Click on my name above.
ephedradiet 1 year ago
chan one of the all time greats my azz
jbm2005 1 year ago
@jbm2005 The guy almost won it three times in a row. No one's ever done that. Yeah, he's pretty good. You don't hear much from him anymore because he's kicking ass in cash games.
I'm not even a Chan fanboy, but denying his skill is just dumb.
ShallowBayBandit 1 year ago 2
most of the top house hold names in poker these days are far better players than Phil in my opinion but all of them havent bought into every NLH wsop tornement for the past 30+ years so havent got as many braclets.
idalgleish87 1 year ago
rofl and that moron would call anyone that calls that with ace ten a donk for sure i dunno how he was winning only one tourney
kra1zy 1 year ago
the commentator sucked
JohnF30Music 1 year ago
any card higher then a ten says the announcer. ??!! is he retarted. a king would have filled phil up.
yyweiss89 2 years ago
your exactly right! the guy is a moron
kilnmaster 2 years ago
Hellmuth had AT and Chan had A7... pay attention
Burrundango 2 years ago
i met phil in portland <----------no jokes
mickymacky02 2 years ago
i hate those all ins before the flop.
XowntXihqX 2 years ago 3
@XowntXihqX Me as well.
nights1515 1 year ago
LOL "I was suprised when he rolled over ace ten of spades". Meanwhile Phil was all in on a 3 way pot with A7 and got very lucky to spike an ace on the flop. Phil always amazes me with his inability to see when he gets very lucky, and his child-like behavior when he loses against an "inferior" hand.
dayingyang0 2 years ago
he was destined to win haha what would the poker world be if it didnt have hellmuth
fromtheabove 2 years ago
he is the biggest douche bag in the world.
brown5md 2 years ago 3
Boy the commentator sucked
alrightythenGr 2 years ago 5
very true jeffmagic32, phil is my favorite player but I do believe if Stu "The Kid" Unger were still alive he would have like 20 bracelets already.
DoralMan18 2 years ago
Calling an all in re raise wih Ace Ten?
xendon68 2 years ago 4
he would kill himself on tv if some1 did that too him now.
toonful 2 years ago
phil was second in chips, he had about 25 BBs behind if he loses. Plus he is suited and gives himself a chance to go straight to heads up play. What this video dosn't show is the initial raise, lott was in the big blind and re-raised when in came around. Phil is gettin about 2.5 to 1.
ttom1122 2 years ago
Imagine if Helmuth had pocket T's losing against AT....
"He called a raise with Ace (beep) Ten (beep) (beep). Can't (beep) believe this. This is unreal, (beep) incredible. This are the worst (beep) players in the world. I guess if luck weren't involved I'd win every hand. "
DubRighteous 2 years ago
That was a surprisingly loose call from Chan. I'm sure he thought he could out play Phil so it seems strange that he would call off all his money pre flop with that hand.
jeffmagic32 2 years ago
yea i thought so too chan wouldnt do that nowadays
jdog108048 2 years ago
Looks like Zewin is from the future
davidpmacdonald 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Get up to $600 REAL MONEY to play poker for FREE. No deposit or credit cards required!
Add me as a friend and check out my channel for details!
stevenwasicka 2 years ago
phill's voice sounds exactly the same as it does now.
Nicoyutub 2 years ago 55
O R LY
ErsinYildiz 1 year ago
@Nicoyutub well its the same guy isnt it? uhhhh,..........
brainsbranes 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Compare today's production values to this garbage. Terrible audio, pathetic commentary, and teh graphics suxxors
MarkH10 2 years ago
They did what they can in that year D:
mightybatillo 2 years ago
That thing he says about he wins with any card higher then a 10 is bullshit.. 10,J,Q,A would win it but the king won't
PocketAceBas 2 years ago 35
@PocketAceBas YES the King does win it, phil wuld have a full house... look again
LaMusicaVaBene 1 year ago
U absolutely right
FURERS 1 year ago
Comment removed
BurnYourCash 9 months ago
@BurnYourCash but another king would have been a fullboat for Hellmuth
johne71 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JOIN Full Tilt Poker and receive a 100% pay back bonus for money deposited using the referral code: OPTV100
US PLAYERS WELCOME FOR REAL MONEY DEPOSITS!!
Use referral code: OPTV100
THIS IS NOT SPAM
golf22494 2 years ago
Greatest poker player, hands down.
Sambarre 2 years ago
how many bracelets does johhny chan, hellmuth and Stu Ungar have in total, there are bracelets for the best player and other things right?
julesickdrums 2 years ago
Phil has 11 bracelets Chan has 10 and Stuey has 5. Three of Sty's bracelets were in the main event. He played the main event 3 times and won all 3. Some people thought he was clairvoyant and many believe he was the greatest poker player to have ever played.
jeffmagic32 2 years ago
Its bullshit when the commentators say when Chan and Hellmuth are allin Chan A 7, Phil 9 9 .. flop k 10 k, turn Q.. commentators say that any card over a 10 wins the pot to Chan. Lol NO!!!! Only a 10, J, Q or an Ace would help Chan.
totallyrandom02 2 years ago
Lol I was thinking the same thing, if a king comes out Phil has a fullhouse, Chan has trips.
AlwaysUnited 2 years ago
Wow. In '89, Chan was already considered "legendary".
Dan742617000027 2 years ago
well he had already won two world series in a row and almost won 3??
Allistar123 2 years ago
Don't get me wrong, Chan fully deserved to be considered legendary in '89. It just amazed me that even twenty years ago he was already one of the greats!
Dan742617000027 2 years ago
Hellmuth probably watches this vid every night..... Douche.
wop182 2 years ago
I would aswell if i was him, he played like a legend and deserves his bracelets
ILuv2FuckHard 2 years ago
Zewin looks like the bad guy from Superman Returns.
SSky06 2 years ago 6
For poker tips & vids and big cash bonuses visit w w w .betbackofthe. net
betbackofthenet 2 years ago
wtf would u go all in with dueces..... youd think you would be a bit smarter if you got to the final table
AceGuitarR7 2 years ago
back then poker was played very differently.. they didn't have all the books they do now.. people didn't understand the odds like they do now(thx to computers) poker was a gamblers game back then.. just like every other game and sport.. it evolved into what it is today....
Sezlar 2 years ago
they still had stragerty and new the odds but maybe not percantages. johnny chan was two time winner allready. also hellmuth said after he won this that he knew he was a 2-1 favourite when he went all in against chan, so there was stratergie but your right it is alot easier to find information and the different percantages.
AceGuitarR7 2 years ago
Ace 7...Not smart.
mindofmorrison 2 years ago
Why the hell is with looking straigth into the camera..
djaf420 2 years ago
God, I cant believe I just sat through a video of PH playing poker. I WANT MY 6:53 BACK!!!
SebastianEngland 2 years ago
wtf part 2 of 4 its over???
xIRISHxBLOODx 2 years ago
...did he really do the same thing with pocket nines that Dwan did to him with pocket tens?...
...Seriously?
RussellsParadox 2 years ago
Oh, Chan was short-stacked. My bad.
RussellsParadox 2 years ago
No, he didn't. Hellmuth moved all in first with the aces and Dwan made the call with the tens. When Hellmuth won this tournament, he made the move first with his nines.
jgold2790 2 years ago
Dwan moved in with the tens.
Amaru19 2 years ago
Wrong. Hellmuth re-raised and Dwan re-raised all in. Watch it again.
But as I mentioned, these were different circumstances.
RussellsParadox 2 years ago
No he didn't, you got it the other way around.
zagross16 2 years ago
No - Phil's 9's were a slight favorite against Chan's A7. In the game you refer to, Dwan was a 4 to 1 dog with 10's vs AA.
rocketscience21 2 years ago
goin all in with pockets dueces? alrighty then! i don' think id ever bring my lucky orange to a tournament!
qWeer0ne 2 years ago
heads up and Ace is good and having A7 heads up isnt bad so i expect most poker pro's would of made the same call going all in i know i would of lol
mrtalkischeap 2 years ago
what the hell are you talking about A7??? bad call by chan , i dont know what kind of odds he was getting but he could have made history if he didnt donk of the tournament here, imagine 3peat
a123a456a123a456a 2 years ago
an Ace is always good heads up just unfortunate phil had pocket 9's but yet again chan could of hit am Ace then phil would have no chance
mrtalkischeap 2 years ago
even still he had to figure he was a dog, i dont know what percentage of his stack was already in there, but when hellmouth 3 bet it he had to of known he was at least a 2 to 1 dog or worse!
a123a456a123a456a 2 years ago
a good chance to double up aswel and its double up or nothing situation
mrtalkischeap 2 years ago
Overall I think it was the right play especially since he has the chance to knock off 2 players AND it looks like he still has ALOT of chips to play with if his hand does not win (looks like he would have had about 500k left, and this was about a 600k pot)
spicegirl81 2 years ago
Wow some of you jumping down Phil's throat for calling All-in with ATs have no concept of poker odds... For starters we have no indication of the blinds or antes at this stage nor do we know the chip counts but it looks like at the begining of the hand Phil had both players well covered. First Chan folds then a short-stacked player shoves for 83k in chips.
MTLZ28 2 years ago
Easy call for phil since the range of this player who is pushing is enormous, he could very well be up against a rag ace, small pair or even any 2 cards like QJ.
Furthermore there is only one player left to act behind hellmuth so the chances that there are any more decisions left to make in this hand are small. Easy call.
Now unfortunately the last player did in fact move in for 163k more on top of the 83k so now it's time to do a little math:
MTLZ28 2 years ago
Comment removed
MTLZ28 2 years ago
ATs holds up well against 2 players considering the pot odds:
if he is up against 2 small pairs he wins: 41%
if he is up against 2 players with undercards to the ace like KJ QJ KQ J9(unlikely but still possible) he wins: 40%
if he is up against an underpair and a dominating ace (which could very well be) he wins: 24%
MTLZ28 2 years ago
if he is up against a small pair and a overpair to the 10 (like KK, QQ also likely since the last player to move in seems pretty solid from what we've seen) he wins: 29% he's not in bad shape and getting almost the odds to call here
The only situation where he is crushed and it's a terrible call is if the opponent last to move in is holding AA which is unlikely since he is himself holding an ace.
spicegirl81 2 years ago
Comment removed
MTLZ28 2 years ago
Just a correction he is getting actually MORE than the odds to call even against a player holding KK or QQ and assuming the other player has an underpair.
spicegirl81 2 years ago
there was 249k in the pot before the second player re-raised 163k more total.
It is back to hellmuth who needs to call 163k into a pot that now contains 413k.
He is getting almost 3 to 1 on his money WITHOUT even considering the blinds or antes. This means he only needs to win roughly 25% of the time to make this call profitable. There is a bit more to it considering the side pot but we will keep it simple...
MTLZ28 2 years ago
phils become scared of playing big pots his more of a tight agressive player now
161phil161 2 years ago
Knocking out two players with A10 offsuit was just plain lucky. POKER BRAT had only 3 outs. I can't believe he called two all-ins with that hand. He was very likely to be dominated (AK AQ AJ AA 1010). Stupid stupid play.
SuperPokerBrat 2 years ago
don like like loud ass havad khan
fffcccf 2 years ago
the commentator says that Chan can win with any card higher than a 10 on the river, but a K doesn't give the hand to Chan. It just gives a fh to Phil
AMagno12 2 years ago
johnny chan - what a fat litttle wank!
weemikey70 2 years ago
Hellmuth won this WSOP against a total of 178 other entrants. Not quite the same as winning a WSOP ME with 7,500 entrants.
I've won online freerolls with more players than this WSOP had.
jugganaut35 2 years ago
It was 178 pros in the tournament dont compare your 178 player freerolls to a 178 player wsop event.
char3795 2 years ago 4
hellmuth looked gay when the river came
AhYaOk 2 years ago
1st of all, you're kidding yourself if you think every player even in this tourney was a pro. Probably a higher % of them were, but there were probably some hi roller whales and amateurs as well.
2nd, you missed the point. I wasn't comparing myself to Hellmuth. The point was, there are FAR fewer hard decisions to be made and far less luck needed to win a 178-man tourney than to even cash in a 5,000+ tourney.
Sure he won back then, but it's not as impressive as it is now.
jugganaut35 2 years ago
So what you are saying is that winning a tournament that involves a lot more luck is a bigger accomplishment than a tournament that requires a lot more skill?
Way to start out sounding like an idiot, then re-posting to prove that you are.
Gratz on your play money victories.
vicmackirov 2 years ago
Yeah sure, that's what I'm saying, all you need is a boatload of luck to win a 7,000+ tourney.
Winning a 2-day tourney as opposed to winning a weeklong+ tourney now? Yeah forget stamina and good decision making for triple the amount of time, all you need now is a truckload of luck. That's exactly what I said all right.
Try taking a reading comprehension course sometime. You need it.
jugganaut35 2 years ago
cool man^^
koahart 2 years ago
Then you go and give Don Zewin a bad
beat with ironically 10's. Obviously,
we could be watching Don Zewin as
"the poker brat"
OppPaul 2 years ago
i didnt under stand the last hand... : / why Hellmuth win?
1325194 2 years ago
he had two pair, 9's and kings, chan only had kings
fatpeasant 2 years ago
Ooo thanxs xD haha
1325194 2 years ago
lol wtf is don zewin wearing?!?!?
misterill 2 years ago
Idk but it looks like something Michael Jackson would have wore
EliteOutlaw 2 years ago
actually a Q woulda counterfitted him as well
johndawson420 2 years ago
oriental express?! c'mon man, wtf. i don't see how that shit flies for anyone, let alone johnny chan.
barracudatheband 2 years ago
i doubt it had the offensive connotations it does now 20 years ago, and also if you listen to the announcer he's definitely not using it in any kind of offensive or derogatory way - its clear he has a great deal of genuine respect for the player just from his commentary.
brandoH85 2 years ago
Wow what a joke of a commentator. Guess he has no idea that a 10 would counterfit 99. Or a king would make a full house for hellmuth.
skinhorse13 2 years ago 4
on the river, before the flop johnny was a about 3:2.5
voznow7 2 years ago
Ya Phil, you were actually a 4:1 Favorite.
Good reading abilities.
voznow7 2 years ago
At no point during the final hand was Phil a 4-1 favorite.
canadianpoker83 2 years ago 3