Yeah, that's what we need, more ways to kill our selves, or more specific, a way to USA become the ruler of the World. Instead why don't you research a plane crash resistant, for people not dying on aerial crashes or a better way to deliver food to poor Countries or ways to have a World without hunger or poverty, where everyone can have a house, a car, and everything an USA citizen has?
@TumisHumis true but it helps anyway, but we need a solution not a patch, check my channel to help finding one. What I meant was that we need to distribute wealth in ways we can help Humanity, we have great military tech now, we don't need new ways to kill ourselves, we have more than enough now. If we could UNITE the world, fulfilling the needs of every Country in a World wide effort we wouldn't need powerful armies to defend from each other, probably all armies would disappear leaving police.
@saultube44 One world government? No thanks, maybe you should read a book. Americans do think they're better than other people (as do i) Europeans are all way too proud of their countries, yeah we need borders.
@TumisHumis I think that's exactly why we don't need them, World Bank the FMI make ridiculous loans to poor Countries and slave them economically, I think some morons still like slavery; so if we share resources we'd be sharing knowledge also, so more people would participate and collaborate, that changes not only National proud but many things, selfishness is the root of many bad things in the World, including war and the reason Countries need to build machines like this.
@saultube44 You haven't given it enough thought. Self preservation (Greed) whatever you want to call it is what keeps any species alive. We wouldn't have computers if people lived for eachother.. we'd live in huts and be hungry. If you want to buy your friend something, by all means that's nice, but you shouldn't be obligated to do it from birth. You really should find a book to read, because the way you're thinking, or (not) thinking is a huge problem in the world today.
@TumisHumis You should get thinking instead and have heart and leave you fear behind, because people like you are the ones polluting the planet and making wars. Your fearful & close minded attitude is what is keeping you from seeing that without greed centuries of war would had been saved and progress would have come long ago. And not everything is greed, the Internet, freeware & opensource for example are proof of at least some part of the world want to share at a global scale.
You don't see what I mean, even when I had written so, and I should get a book? I should get thinking? Is not about understanding the world today, which is based on greed, is about a change of mind to a better thinking, share instead of war, simple yet people like you don't get it. We could feed the world with all the resources worldwide, help people better in case of disasters like the one in Japan now, having a world wide strength and organization, is short team work.
@saultube44 African countries have a sense of belonging and community. They've given nothing to the world in the last 500 years. The Soviet Union created nothing. Communist China has created nothing of worth. Free people with their own intrests in mind create things. Very young America can claim the; Computer, Internet, Airplane, *Mass Production*, Nuclear weapons & energy, *Electricity*, the light bulb, and countless other inventions. We didn't make these things because we were told to.
@TumisHumis You did it AGAIN, writing of things I've already wrote, those Countries were colonies or tried to or economic colonies, by richer Countries like USA, as I explained before, so don't blame those Countries out of ignorance, also USA, France, England, Russia and other countries that sell arms promote war in Countries like Ira, Iraq, East Asia, Middle East. Your fearful & retrograde anti-communist thinking fails to asses effectively the current worldwide situation.
@TumisHumis Communism was established where capitalism failed, not by ideology but in practice and Kingdoms/Empires by tradition. See the world trend in the last 3,000 years is to group up tribes/regions & small kingdoms in Countries, the error is to try to change the identity of the regions grouped; grouping yes, force change of identity no, diversity instead. Communism has failed worldwide, but capitalism collateral is extreme poverty and richness, socialism a better solution but I think...
@TumisHumis even better is to learn to share worldwide, a method is yet to be invented and perfected over time but before that we need to start changing our way of thinking and feeling. And if your paranoid mind thinks it will be Communism, well in a way yes, since we would be a worldwide community but not communists as the classic ideology, but in a new and better one invented worldwide and perfected the same way, we have the technology now, and many efforts are made that way, even software.
@TumisHumis So in a way also would be a worldwide democracy, since both ideologies put together are socialism, will be exactly that: a worldwide society with a worldwide socialist political system, which makes a lot of sense, at least to me. So your fear is you get to be pushover by comunists, but witht the patriotic act USA can do that to any citizen in USA, also CIA is violates constitutional rights all the time, is USA Gov, personal hit squad; pray to God you don't get noticed by them.
HISTORY 1ST FLIGHT with STEALTH-TAILLESS-THRUST-VECTORING Air Vehicle (1987, classified until May 2010) is now available to the public on Facebook "Benjamin Gal-Or". The new era in aviation, updated to June 2010, is also reviewed there via Comments.
you idiot the gotha 229 was a full embodied wing this has stub wings and flies twice as fast and is made of titanium composites although it is true the world benefited from stolen german technology from ww2 ;with that we won the race to the moon thank you vaun braun
You're all worried about that? What about the low and medium tech weapons the USA SELLS to countries that will likely BE their enemies in the next 10-20 years? The sheer volume of that alone is far worse than someone maybe hacking a drone!
@TonyN737 Oh I dont know about that.....a UAV can wistand G forces that if an F-22 or F-35 would try to pull off, the Pilot inside would be reduced to a blob of Jello. Also less weight because no cockpit means more agility as well. Better radar invisibility from no cockpit also means less of a chance of radar lock by missils, which means a pilot has to make visual contact to aim. Hard to aim at something so small! UAV's R the future of armed combat...get used to it!
meh, I think you might be surprised. Many UAV's can pull a lot of G's, but are generally limited to be slightly lower than our new fighters (Be that an F-22, F-35, SU-37, or whatever). Much of the electronics that stabilize the aircraft have a maximum g-force limit, and once the limit is passed, they cannot do their jobs properly. This is not saying that a UAV can't do high G maneuvers, it's just saying that like other all aircraft, maximum limits still exist.
Point taken...but the maximum is still higher than a human body can wistand. Also the human body can not be improved...while technology is improving everyday. Until tech that can literealy erase inertia is in existance the human body will always be limited by its own fragility. electronic stablization tech can always be improved upon...up to the physical limits of the material in use.
@assoonas1 Well, perhaps when it comes to improving our ability to wistand disease/injury through medical procedures and pharmecuticals.....but if you are meaning the ability to wistand G-forces, I think we are not at that level yet, unless you count G-force suits which squeeze the body to keep blood pressure more regular...but these only do so much. Sure in the future perhaps we can have cyborg pilots that can wistand 30-40 G's...but who would sign up for the procedure? LOL!
@assoonas1 GEN."Soldier we are going to replace your bodily organs, excluding your brain, but INcluding your genitals, with these little gizmos with blinking lights/tubes and wire coming out of it....do you have a problem with that soldier"....SOLDIER:"NO SIR...er...wait did you say my genitals too?" GEN:"WHAT WAS THAT SOLDIER!? ARE BACK SASSING ME?" SOLDIER: "NO SIR.....its just.......did U say U were gonna cut off my junk?....cause I'm not really OK with that.." GEN:"SHUT YOUR MOUTH SOLDIER"
@frankensteinmoneymac Good thing USA made this not to mention US Missles can hit a penny in space so anything something small isn't safe etheir not to mention F-22 and F-35 pilots don't have to aim since both planes have missle lock
@bingofioul Eh, im not sure I'd agree....anymore modern fighter jets are very interconnected and dependendant on signals from computers on other aircraft and on the ground....Both for navigation and targeting. In theory a UAV could be more vulnerable to such things than a human piloted craft, but I think in real world combat situations UAV's are not likely to be all that much more vulnerable to such things than a human piloted craft would be.
The advantage a UAV has is that it's maneuvers aren't limited by the frailty of a human pilot (9g's). The disadvantage a UAV has is that other than high-g manuvers, it doesn't have the brain of a human on-board for situational awareness. UAV will be the future of many aviation applications, but it will be a long time before we trade in human-pilots for air superiority. A UAV makes a fine bomber. A UAV makes a fine RECON or single-strike platform. Ariel combat remains a human specialty.
not for long. Before long if not allready the entire concept of aerial combat will be obsolete, aircraft to aircraft at least in terms of pilot control.
los pilotos se quedaron sin chamba
manuelespiritu 7 months ago
like that one movie, stealth
juki0h 8 months ago
..And being escorted by the most beautiful and timeless fighter aircraft of all time, the F/A-18
groov539 9 months ago
Yeah, that's what we need, more ways to kill our selves, or more specific, a way to USA become the ruler of the World. Instead why don't you research a plane crash resistant, for people not dying on aerial crashes or a better way to deliver food to poor Countries or ways to have a World without hunger or poverty, where everyone can have a house, a car, and everything an USA citizen has?
saultube44 11 months ago
@saultube44 Feeding people doesn't solve world hunger. We've been feeding the world for years.
TumisHumis 11 months ago
@TumisHumis true but it helps anyway, but we need a solution not a patch, check my channel to help finding one. What I meant was that we need to distribute wealth in ways we can help Humanity, we have great military tech now, we don't need new ways to kill ourselves, we have more than enough now. If we could UNITE the world, fulfilling the needs of every Country in a World wide effort we wouldn't need powerful armies to defend from each other, probably all armies would disappear leaving police.
saultube44 11 months ago
@saultube44 One world government? No thanks, maybe you should read a book. Americans do think they're better than other people (as do i) Europeans are all way too proud of their countries, yeah we need borders.
TumisHumis 10 months ago
@TumisHumis I think that's exactly why we don't need them, World Bank the FMI make ridiculous loans to poor Countries and slave them economically, I think some morons still like slavery; so if we share resources we'd be sharing knowledge also, so more people would participate and collaborate, that changes not only National proud but many things, selfishness is the root of many bad things in the World, including war and the reason Countries need to build machines like this.
saultube44 10 months ago
@saultube44 You haven't given it enough thought. Self preservation (Greed) whatever you want to call it is what keeps any species alive. We wouldn't have computers if people lived for eachother.. we'd live in huts and be hungry. If you want to buy your friend something, by all means that's nice, but you shouldn't be obligated to do it from birth. You really should find a book to read, because the way you're thinking, or (not) thinking is a huge problem in the world today.
TumisHumis 10 months ago
@TumisHumis You should get thinking instead and have heart and leave you fear behind, because people like you are the ones polluting the planet and making wars. Your fearful & close minded attitude is what is keeping you from seeing that without greed centuries of war would had been saved and progress would have come long ago. And not everything is greed, the Internet, freeware & opensource for example are proof of at least some part of the world want to share at a global scale.
saultube44 10 months ago
You don't see what I mean, even when I had written so, and I should get a book? I should get thinking? Is not about understanding the world today, which is based on greed, is about a change of mind to a better thinking, share instead of war, simple yet people like you don't get it. We could feed the world with all the resources worldwide, help people better in case of disasters like the one in Japan now, having a world wide strength and organization, is short team work.
saultube44 10 months ago
T ogether
E each
A chieves
M ore
I hope you get it now and read my previous comments before answering, you write of things I have already commented before.
saultube44 10 months ago
@saultube44 African countries have a sense of belonging and community. They've given nothing to the world in the last 500 years. The Soviet Union created nothing. Communist China has created nothing of worth. Free people with their own intrests in mind create things. Very young America can claim the; Computer, Internet, Airplane, *Mass Production*, Nuclear weapons & energy, *Electricity*, the light bulb, and countless other inventions. We didn't make these things because we were told to.
TumisHumis 10 months ago
@TumisHumis You did it AGAIN, writing of things I've already wrote, those Countries were colonies or tried to or economic colonies, by richer Countries like USA, as I explained before, so don't blame those Countries out of ignorance, also USA, France, England, Russia and other countries that sell arms promote war in Countries like Ira, Iraq, East Asia, Middle East. Your fearful & retrograde anti-communist thinking fails to asses effectively the current worldwide situation.
saultube44 10 months ago
Comment removed
saultube44 10 months ago
Comment removed
saultube44 10 months ago
@TumisHumis Communism was established where capitalism failed, not by ideology but in practice and Kingdoms/Empires by tradition. See the world trend in the last 3,000 years is to group up tribes/regions & small kingdoms in Countries, the error is to try to change the identity of the regions grouped; grouping yes, force change of identity no, diversity instead. Communism has failed worldwide, but capitalism collateral is extreme poverty and richness, socialism a better solution but I think...
saultube44 10 months ago
@TumisHumis even better is to learn to share worldwide, a method is yet to be invented and perfected over time but before that we need to start changing our way of thinking and feeling. And if your paranoid mind thinks it will be Communism, well in a way yes, since we would be a worldwide community but not communists as the classic ideology, but in a new and better one invented worldwide and perfected the same way, we have the technology now, and many efforts are made that way, even software.
saultube44 10 months ago
@TumisHumis So in a way also would be a worldwide democracy, since both ideologies put together are socialism, will be exactly that: a worldwide society with a worldwide socialist political system, which makes a lot of sense, at least to me. So your fear is you get to be pushover by comunists, but witht the patriotic act USA can do that to any citizen in USA, also CIA is violates constitutional rights all the time, is USA Gov, personal hit squad; pray to God you don't get noticed by them.
saultube44 10 months ago
@TumisHumis Read this book Perkins, John - Confessions of an Economic Hitman, sude and get a better clue what USA GOv is all about.
saultube44 10 months ago
said to see guys. as cool as this thing is, it marks the end of fighter pilots.
and soon, things like this will move into private markets.... thus the end of pilots all together.
iostream999 1 year ago
if fact never play this angine looks back words
SOWHATIMADEIT 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HISTORY 1ST FLIGHT with STEALTH-TAILLESS-THRUST-VECTORING Air Vehicle (1987, classified until May 2010) is now available to the public on Facebook "Benjamin Gal-Or". The new era in aviation, updated to June 2010, is also reviewed there via Comments.
1Bengalor 1 year ago
Oh I saw one of these at the local bbq and outdoor lifestyle convention. It's a pizza oven that delivers pizza super fucking fast right?
LOLDISNEYLAND 1 year ago
@LOLDISNEYLAND exactly lol
hahahafunnymyass 1 year ago
Im getting 1 for my B-Day.
Just joking.
LukRacer 2 years ago
give me 10 billion and i can build anything u see on you tube. there easy said and done.
codezeeky 2 years ago 2
really :) i will give u but just a play money :) LOL ... +1
astoniz 1 year ago
WOAH!! I didn't know they already had prototypes of that thing!! Sweet :P
CyclonicTuna023 2 years ago
you idiot the gotha 229 was a full embodied wing this has stub wings and flies twice as fast and is made of titanium composites although it is true the world benefited from stolen german technology from ww2 ;with that we won the race to the moon thank you vaun braun
montrose1731 2 years ago
just a copy of HO -229
World War II prototype flying wing fighter/bomber, designed by Reimar and Walter Horten and built by Gothaer Waggonfabrik.
ozeangruen 2 years ago
LOL-VTOL-UAV maybe?
theinfiniteidea 2 years ago
It's like a humming birds tail feathers attached to a pumpkin seed and given propulsion. LMAO! Clever hairless monkeys. What will they think of next?
dutchtrader 2 years ago
ooOOoo...no rudder. They have little flappies on the wings. lol
slacker3442 2 years ago
Gentlemen this is the reason to go for engineering. This and only this! lol.
mar221985 2 years ago
for emergencie vehicule .excellent
pipil63 2 years ago
theres every ufo incident in usa for last thirty years...
tinman842 2 years ago 2
As we get more "robotized" our achilles heel grows bigger.
The ability to take over control by an enemy of these systems will come back to bite us in the ass!
will4ward 2 years ago
Not to mention our extreme reliance on GPS for vehicles, munitions etc.
Caleb6543 2 years ago
You're all worried about that? What about the low and medium tech weapons the USA SELLS to countries that will likely BE their enemies in the next 10-20 years? The sheer volume of that alone is far worse than someone maybe hacking a drone!
pwnage0013 2 years ago
Good point. Pwnage
However Its known that when the US sells systems to other nations they usually have the tech to knocxk them down.
That why they have "export versions",obviously is they independently upgraded the avionics - your screnario would become real.
cinewill1 2 years ago
Yes !!!
adamlinks 2 years ago
Someday this little guy will be out in front of the F-22 and the F-35. Nobody stand a chance against them.
TonyN737 2 years ago
@TonyN737 Oh I dont know about that.....a UAV can wistand G forces that if an F-22 or F-35 would try to pull off, the Pilot inside would be reduced to a blob of Jello. Also less weight because no cockpit means more agility as well. Better radar invisibility from no cockpit also means less of a chance of radar lock by missils, which means a pilot has to make visual contact to aim. Hard to aim at something so small! UAV's R the future of armed combat...get used to it!
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago 8
meh, I think you might be surprised. Many UAV's can pull a lot of G's, but are generally limited to be slightly lower than our new fighters (Be that an F-22, F-35, SU-37, or whatever). Much of the electronics that stabilize the aircraft have a maximum g-force limit, and once the limit is passed, they cannot do their jobs properly. This is not saying that a UAV can't do high G maneuvers, it's just saying that like other all aircraft, maximum limits still exist.
childsca 2 years ago
Point taken...but the maximum is still higher than a human body can wistand. Also the human body can not be improved...while technology is improving everyday. Until tech that can literealy erase inertia is in existance the human body will always be limited by its own fragility. electronic stablization tech can always be improved upon...up to the physical limits of the material in use.
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
True true. Everything you say is correct, it is the future and we cannot deny it.
childsca 2 years ago
@frankensteinmoneymac technology can improve the human body and does
assoonas1 1 year ago
@assoonas1 Well, perhaps when it comes to improving our ability to wistand disease/injury through medical procedures and pharmecuticals.....but if you are meaning the ability to wistand G-forces, I think we are not at that level yet, unless you count G-force suits which squeeze the body to keep blood pressure more regular...but these only do so much. Sure in the future perhaps we can have cyborg pilots that can wistand 30-40 G's...but who would sign up for the procedure? LOL!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac I'm positive if a U.S. soldier was asked to alter his body to become a better soldier many would sign up without question
assoonas1 1 year ago
@assoonas1 GEN."Soldier we are going to replace your bodily organs, excluding your brain, but INcluding your genitals, with these little gizmos with blinking lights/tubes and wire coming out of it....do you have a problem with that soldier"....SOLDIER:"NO SIR...er...wait did you say my genitals too?" GEN:"WHAT WAS THAT SOLDIER!? ARE BACK SASSING ME?" SOLDIER: "NO SIR.....its just.......did U say U were gonna cut off my junk?....cause I'm not really OK with that.." GEN:"SHUT YOUR MOUTH SOLDIER"
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac Sounds like you would be great at making a movie or book
assoonas1 1 year ago
@assoonas1 Haha...Thanks! I guess the whole Cyborg talk inspired me to be a bit creative LOL!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@assoonas1 I just like looking at the cool advancements. military or not
assoonas1 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac You are a ture american..... Thank you!
MrJownby 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac Good thing USA made this not to mention US Missles can hit a penny in space so anything something small isn't safe etheir not to mention F-22 and F-35 pilots don't have to aim since both planes have missle lock
lordcrusade 6 months ago
@frankensteinmoneymac you can crack an UAV or jam it with ECM, you can't do it with a real pilot onboard,
bingofioul 4 months ago
@bingofioul Eh, im not sure I'd agree....anymore modern fighter jets are very interconnected and dependendant on signals from computers on other aircraft and on the ground....Both for navigation and targeting. In theory a UAV could be more vulnerable to such things than a human piloted craft, but I think in real world combat situations UAV's are not likely to be all that much more vulnerable to such things than a human piloted craft would be.
frankensteinmoneymac 4 months ago
I think they will blend UCAV's and all 5th gen + AC with new stuff called
Meta-Materials/UCB
very unique and looks like a real possible future skin for AC...
wyrdmagyk4 2 years ago
Anyone know of a VTOL aircraft like this that can carry a load out of at least 1000 Kilo's?
DWoroner 2 years ago
nice job.
JumpingMusic 2 years ago
The advantage a UAV has is that it's maneuvers aren't limited by the frailty of a human pilot (9g's). The disadvantage a UAV has is that other than high-g manuvers, it doesn't have the brain of a human on-board for situational awareness. UAV will be the future of many aviation applications, but it will be a long time before we trade in human-pilots for air superiority. A UAV makes a fine bomber. A UAV makes a fine RECON or single-strike platform. Ariel combat remains a human specialty.
Kamakiriad66 2 years ago
not for long. Before long if not allready the entire concept of aerial combat will be obsolete, aircraft to aircraft at least in terms of pilot control.
sirachman 2 years ago
Ariel combat remains a human specialty for now. In a couple decades...I think UCAVs will probably be able to school any human pilot.
O8SERVER 2 years ago
That's right, the best thing to kill other humans are humans...
asjeot 2 years ago
the X- series isn't really designed to kill, its more for flying to the edge of space, and flying very fast, recon and stealth.
themandude20 2 years ago
It's funny, landing gear has to work perfectly every flight, and they don't trust it till flight no.6..............LOL
gregrutz 2 years ago
what propulsion does it use?
sandspider30 2 years ago
Well think of it more as a reusable cruise missile and surveillance platform.
They would be easy pickings for any manned fighter even an old Mig 21 as it's no EDI so you still need conventional fighters for cover.
Membrane556 3 years ago
no need for cover cause its a drone. no reason putting people's lives at risk over a robot.
d0peY12 2 years ago
its a drone
deltaforce787 3 years ago
Is this a step ahead of SU47? This is the future of aircraft?
monkeyboy1951 3 years ago
"This is the future of aircraft?"
Pretty much, yeah. Saves a lot of money i think.
MokomaSusi 3 years ago