it's the chain rule: since your differentiating with respect to a different variable, you find the derivative of the x^2 (2x), followed by the prime of x with respect to the other the variable (dx/dt). If confused, try taking the derivative of x^2 with respect to x (d/dx {x^2}), what you get is 2x*dx/dx (dx/dx is x prime) and the dx/dx cancel out to become 1. the value then become equal to 2x. Hope it helps
but, after .5 seconds wouldn't the bottom point have moved over .5*4=2m; 2+8=10m so the ladder would be laying on the ground meaning that the y value had moved 6m in .5 seconds? that would imply 12 m/s (technically or -12, whatever since it's velocity) yet this video tells me 16/3 or -16/3 m/s. Where does my intuition go wrong?
That's the average speed it's falling from the interval x=[8-10], not the speed it's falling at a given point.
Think about it like this, you go out driving, starting at 0 mph, and end up going 60 miles in one hour, giving you an average speed of 60 mph's, but you didn't start at 60mph, you started at 0 mph, so the average speed isn't necessarily the speed at any given point.
and that's where Calculus starts to diverges from Algebra
@BarbierNicholas This might be a distant analogy, but think about it this way. The car is moving in a constant velocity, meaning it IS moving. However, the acceleration would be a zero since there is no change in the velocity. However, similar to this problem, this is not always the case, because normally the acceleration changes (the car does not move in a constant speed). That's when we need calculus to figure out the rate of change
I have this question sal: I think you only found the rate of change at that instant and not a general expression. Sorry if I'm wrong, but I found: x=8+4t so y=sqrt(10^2-x^2) and y'=[8(t-2)/sqrt(4t^2-16t+9)] and when t=0, y'=-5.33, the same result as you. But erm as plainly obvious y' cannot be a constant. I think by substituting 6 and 8 into your implicitly done y' you chose to find the rate of change of ladder vertically at exactly t=0 moment. Love you Sal btw you're a great teacher!
Sal, you are my lord and savior. Thanks to you I have successfully tacked my first related rates problem. I now feel confident heading into my test tomorrow. Keep up the great work, and know that we all appreciate it.
hi i love watching ur tutorials. I have the same question but little different if you could help me. ( an extension lader with the top resting on a vertical wall is being extended at a rate of 10 m/min. the base is 5 m from the wall. find the rate of sliding up of the top of the lader when the lader is 13 m long? thanks
why not do dy/dx multiplied by dx/dt ? im asking not saying thats the way to do it
ryankhan11 1 week ago
I agree. It really is a classic Rate of Change problem considering I just had a very similar problem during Math class today... :\
Iced0826 1 month ago in playlist Calculus
Anyone else see the beat wearing an elf hat @4:08?
(just drawn)
sam11182 1 month ago
<3
alicegreenfield11 1 month ago
i love you sal!
Askate 1 month ago
Comment removed
zayoob0524 1 month ago
Comment removed
zayoob0524 1 month ago
THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME PASS MY CALCULUS EXAM! =D
juju775 1 month ago
at: 06:15 why do you have to multiply the derivative of x^2 which is 2x by dx/dy i thought it would be just 2x + 2(dy/dx) please help!!!
nike60oncore 2 months ago
@nike60oncore
it's the chain rule: since your differentiating with respect to a different variable, you find the derivative of the x^2 (2x), followed by the prime of x with respect to the other the variable (dx/dt). If confused, try taking the derivative of x^2 with respect to x (d/dx {x^2}), what you get is 2x*dx/dx (dx/dx is x prime) and the dx/dx cancel out to become 1. the value then become equal to 2x. Hope it helps
cybhunter007 2 months ago in playlist Calculus
Sal.. I hope to always have your videos available. I want to show my grandchildren your teachings! ahah Thank you.
i8tweak 2 months ago
THANK YOU. YOU SAVED MY GRADE.
leaoaltamirano 3 months ago
You are a saint. You just filled in "the" missing piece of intuition for me! Thank you so much!
atomikrobot300099 3 months ago
Me & Khan = study buddies for life
93msimpson 3 months ago 6
asdfghjkl;
Sal, You're fricken amazing!
popgirlz312 6 months ago
ur either really good with writing with a mouse, or ur using a pen
WarMachine425 7 months ago
This is a stupid question:
but, after .5 seconds wouldn't the bottom point have moved over .5*4=2m; 2+8=10m so the ladder would be laying on the ground meaning that the y value had moved 6m in .5 seconds? that would imply 12 m/s (technically or -12, whatever since it's velocity) yet this video tells me 16/3 or -16/3 m/s. Where does my intuition go wrong?
BarbierNicholas 8 months ago
@BarbierNicholas
it confused me to
yousmath 8 months ago
Comment removed
Jtwaz1 5 months ago
@BarbierNicholas
That's the average speed it's falling from the interval x=[8-10], not the speed it's falling at a given point.
Think about it like this, you go out driving, starting at 0 mph, and end up going 60 miles in one hour, giving you an average speed of 60 mph's, but you didn't start at 60mph, you started at 0 mph, so the average speed isn't necessarily the speed at any given point.
and that's where Calculus starts to diverges from Algebra
Jtwaz1 5 months ago
@BarbierNicholas This might be a distant analogy, but think about it this way. The car is moving in a constant velocity, meaning it IS moving. However, the acceleration would be a zero since there is no change in the velocity. However, similar to this problem, this is not always the case, because normally the acceleration changes (the car does not move in a constant speed). That's when we need calculus to figure out the rate of change
sweentnhot0104 4 months ago
Comment removed
abhi86255 8 months ago
thank u...........
abhi86255 8 months ago
I was working on this for days! and it just clicks after watching your vids! Thanks Salman
Flows234 8 months ago
Y U NO BE MY TEACHER ?!?
SpiderPig2494 9 months ago
Comment removed
cosminx2003 10 months ago
really clear
demonangels67 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Narrow Naughty girls and ladies here benaughtyman.info
ranjanikumari 1 year ago
You make life so easy sal.. :) thank you sooo much..
s200960170 1 year ago
lol after i finished this i just cussed my self out for being so stupid and not getting this in class.. thanks fly man!
thieflord08 1 year ago
Thank you Sal
coffeecuppepsi 1 year ago
you sir are allowed to teach. cant say the same for my teacher.
elquijote85 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a high probability to date a single mom here naneedj.info
tilanesaram 1 year ago
I have this question sal: I think you only found the rate of change at that instant and not a general expression. Sorry if I'm wrong, but I found: x=8+4t so y=sqrt(10^2-x^2) and y'=[8(t-2)/sqrt(4t^2-16t+9)] and when t=0, y'=-5.33, the same result as you. But erm as plainly obvious y' cannot be a constant. I think by substituting 6 and 8 into your implicitly done y' you chose to find the rate of change of ladder vertically at exactly t=0 moment. Love you Sal btw you're a great teacher!
1001014 1 year ago
You are my Math Hero!
Ghiltzisme 1 year ago
great job thanks.......you awsome...but i have a suggestion and that is if you could number you videos or make one topic connect to each other...ta:)
rayhanna90 1 year ago
thank you so much!! this really helped
sweetpnayxangel 1 year ago
Sal, you are my lord and savior. Thanks to you I have successfully tacked my first related rates problem. I now feel confident heading into my test tomorrow. Keep up the great work, and know that we all appreciate it.
strat0caster266 1 year ago
KHAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you are the greatest!
Boofyable 1 year ago
amazing,,thanks! :D
classifired 1 year ago
Comment removed
chimrae 2 years ago
No....no....no..... the classic rate of change problem is more like the one dealing with shadows....
justapurpose2 2 years ago
greased up haha
yas72090 2 years ago
solid sal you got me through physics and now calc
alliem3131 2 years ago
that kicked ass, thank you
jomorrissey07 2 years ago 18
thanks. i had a similar problem just that i was solving for dx/dt instead of dy/dt
roger9kuo 2 years ago
LOL
tazdevil112 2 years ago
hows that funny?
roger9kuo 2 years ago
Thanks, this was a great help~
cassi1126 2 years ago
thanks, this helped me a lot.
yoliz 2 years ago
thanks again!
USMChiLD 2 years ago
Hi...thanks for all the great tutorials. Could you show an inscribed triangle rate of change problem? Thanks.
mattkelll 3 years ago
i bet your ladder is 10 meters long.
HorsemenofFury 3 years ago
thanks =D
pacmanty 3 years ago
hi i love watching ur tutorials. I have the same question but little different if you could help me. ( an extension lader with the top resting on a vertical wall is being extended at a rate of 10 m/min. the base is 5 m from the wall. find the rate of sliding up of the top of the lader when the lader is 13 m long? thanks
masood365 3 years ago
thnx a lot its really clear now.
Jechux1106 3 years ago
Thank you for doing this and explaining it so well.
elfangor3 3 years ago 12
bad ass. real cool.
dottorecannelle 3 years ago
great vid...
GoldAK47 3 years ago