@VanHaybrook Well you´re free to provide a more plausible theory for earthquakes, fossils found in "wrong" places, mountain chains formation, volcanoes etc.
@VanHaybrook i'm sure that only counts to pseudo-scientists... i've noticed that the greater scientists take with them a healthy amount of skepticism, even to the most evident laws of nature... look at richard feynmann, einstein... even though they were not perfectly free of beliefs, they came close to some kind of mystical view to science, where no truth is definite but at the same time the desire to become all-inclusive, embracing all that is reality through science..
that was their strength, and at the same time weakness, as this endeavour to find all inclusive science may be endless, even when physics, biophysics, neurology and all sciences are combined by one theory... there is no saying this theory is more then a hypothesis as definite as the lives of those who keep it -in mind-
At 6:59, the ridge is clearly way too big to fit Africa.
Also at 8:22, the "transform faults" are shown to be offset from the moment of rifting, which is impossible since it is the offsets of these faults which make the fit of Africa with the ridge so poor, i.e. the offsets must have happened sometime after the original rift.
Find out when next earthquake occurs:
WORLD-EARTHQUAKES . COM
worldethq 1 year ago
Thanks
asas2jh 1 year ago
nice video very interesting!!!
Jeyzze 1 year ago
Thank u 4 this series!
poetryinmotion629 1 year ago
If a theory becomes 'common knowledge' it is called a religion! And plate tectonics seems to be a religion within 'science'.
VanHaybrook 2 years ago
Comment removed
pohjalo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VanHaybrook Well you´re free to provide a more plausible theory for earthquakes, fossils found in "wrong" places, mountain chains formation, volcanoes etc.
pohjalo 1 year ago
Comment removed
pohjalo 1 year ago
@VanHaybrook whis religion is supported by the direct observation of gods with gps systems?
coturnix19 1 year ago
@VanHaybrook i'm sure that only counts to pseudo-scientists... i've noticed that the greater scientists take with them a healthy amount of skepticism, even to the most evident laws of nature... look at richard feynmann, einstein... even though they were not perfectly free of beliefs, they came close to some kind of mystical view to science, where no truth is definite but at the same time the desire to become all-inclusive, embracing all that is reality through science..
SilenzioDiEsistenza 1 year ago
that was their strength, and at the same time weakness, as this endeavour to find all inclusive science may be endless, even when physics, biophysics, neurology and all sciences are combined by one theory... there is no saying this theory is more then a hypothesis as definite as the lives of those who keep it -in mind-
SilenzioDiEsistenza 1 year ago
@ 4:45 Basalt-Man rises out of the depths.
forman1200 2 years ago
this videos awesome
forman1200 2 years ago 2
At 6:59, the ridge is clearly way too big to fit Africa.
Also at 8:22, the "transform faults" are shown to be offset from the moment of rifting, which is impossible since it is the offsets of these faults which make the fit of Africa with the ridge so poor, i.e. the offsets must have happened sometime after the original rift.
trusty72 2 years ago
have you studied geology?
DonnieTheShitworm 2 years ago
Despite the fact that this is realy old it's still quite interesting
daanvdlist 2 years ago 2
how dramatic
nama1995 3 years ago
No way, Tuzo Wilson narrated this.
Awesome!
Adrock828 3 years ago 2