Fernando Sor study Op.6 No.2, Segovia No.3, by lute323

[tooberization]

What edition is this? My ed marks edition doesn't have a repeat after the first part.

[summonshire]

I agree, it's beautiful.

[raulcalderonbird]

Your interpretation is unique (with a beautiful rubato), probably one of the best interpretation of this study.

[lute323]

Thank you for your compliment. One of the best recordings of this piece to my mind is the one played by Christopher Perkening's.

He plays this study beautifully as if he takes us to the world of fantasy.

[lute323]

Plese refer to another performance of mine of this study in YT entitled "Sor study Op6-2 35-17 29-1, Segovia No3, 6, 19 by lute323", which were from live recording in a library concert when I practiced playing the guitar more intensively. These days I am not a diligent player of the guitar.

[raulcalderonbird]

Beautiful interpretation. Five stars.

[lute323]

Thanks for your encouraging comment. I used to keep playing several Sor's study including this piece at the beginning of practice for more than decades, although not recent years.

[catandzeus]

yes it is extremely well played. Why is there a slightly metallic sound in the background somewhere?

[lute323]

That's why I did not get used to recorg my playing in MP3 recorder. Please listen my another video of the same piece recorded by cassette tape recorder long tome ago: Sor study Op6-2 35-17  29-1, Segovia No3, 6, 19 by lute323.

[Gangly1]

How can 928 people have viewed this and not felt obliged to say it is beautifully played??

I do wonder sometimes!!

Regards,

Paul

[lute323]

Thank you for your complements. You really encouraged me. Actually this recording quality is not so good. That may be one of the reasons why audiences' comments were none. The performence on this Sor's piece is much better in another plays in my page, in which I played 3 pieces from Sor's study consecutively. I appreciate your warm comment. Regard. Lute 323.