Added: 4 years ago
From: shahidkazi
Views: 21,641
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if i hit the tv when it starts to die. would it burn thru me O_O

  • >Primary colors of red blue and green.

    >Red Blue Green

    >Green

    >Green is not a primary color -___-

  • anyway, from what I have understood in this video, the laser serves as backlight. this is stupid.

  • deliver image faster? WHATZZZZ IS IT SUPA SPEED OF LIGHT???

    last time i heard about light, it was rolling at 3*10^8 meter/second, and its telling us laser is gonna go FASTER?

    i thought it was just the electronical circutry that is slow.

    and... WHATZZZZ fluorescent lamps with a spinning wheell LMFAO LOL HAHAHAH I SEE NO SPINNING WHEEL IN THE LIGHT IN MY ROOM XD STOOPID CRAP

  • Help ima looser with no life so I'll say a pro said it will give us cancer helllp nooooooooo please stop I wanna ruin a good company for no reason

  • IMMAH GONNA FIRIN' MAH LAS00R !!!

  • lasers hurt your eyes

  • screen breaks and EVERYONE GOES BLIND!!!

  • haha u know kipkay will lose his shit when he sees this tv

  • LCD screens? Without all the electrics to back it up perhaps. But with electrics nothing beats e LED. But perhaps laser will. But the resolution of the laser can't be beat!

  • Oh oh this is no but you must not look at the screen. dammit :D

  • thats why we wont see them ,  cus these tvs will last foreever

  • "because lasers can deliver a thicker signal of colour"

    what. the. fuck. no they don't, they only display a single wavelength. while that may indeed be an advantage in this case (no overlap between the 3 colours, thus reducing saturation), I most certainly would not describe it as a "thicker signal of colour"

    besides looking at how they describe its working principle, this will never be able to become as flat as LCD screens

  • IMMAH CHARGIN' MAH LASERRR!!!

  • doctoroctaganapuse BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!

  • i shall buy a tv and tear it apart for its lasers. muahahahaha

  • and here's tech reporter Jeff Tait.

  • "This is the movie "Finding Nemo" being played through a LASER TV. As you can see, it's exactly like watching "Finding Nemo" through a regular TV. The movie is still silly."

  • It's not supposed to be different picture primarily just an alternative.

  • no such thing as an alternative when what you have is right there in front of you; or as some would say, 'right before you'

  • Wait wait, the "projection tv" they talk about with the colour wheel.. I'm guessing this isn't from a CRT? CRTs have no need for that.

  • I feel like this tv would use way more electricity due to the inefficiency of lasers. They are inefficient due to the need to "pump" electrons to higher states, requiring a large input of energy. In short, lasers are awesome, but unnatural.

  • Duuuude....so much crap in 3 lines...

  • did she say LCD display..../facepalm

  • rear projection = fail,

    plasma = fail

    led = fail

    lcd = succeed, no glare at all because of no glass cover.

  • Faster than LCD ? Lol , that would never happen :)) .

    This technology would only work for projectors and big screen applications , as LCD is definitely better than this on home use .

  • i dont know...i mean the LCD and plasma would have to decode the binary and send the correct signal to fit every single pixel on the screen..i think it would be faster to just decode it in one little box and send it out as a laser intstead of a signal..but i think that lasers would probably break down more easily and could give more of an unacurate picture

  • LED has small life time and it is too expensive for now, but i'm sure that they will fix this in no time and the price is going to be realy good =D

  • @reuwsaat2 = actualy if your carful with a LCD they last a long time...my comp screen is a 5 year old lcd hi-def (for the time) ...........never had a probelm with it

  • red blue and green are the colers that reflects red blue and green are the main color we see

  • well sorry I'm so stupid, but I was always told that red blue and YELLOW were primary, and green is secondary.

  • Red Blue ang Green RGB, are the primary colors of light, in no way are they related to the primary paint colors, and mixing light colors is totally different from paint too.

  • Not really

  • dxont you just hate how someone will just say not really without explaining why they said it... dumb or what

  • That's incorrect. I'm not sure why the color wheel is that way. The primary colors of light are Red, Blue, and Green, While the primary colors of pigments are Cyan, Yellow, and Magenta.

  • Well when using paints red, blue and yellow are the primary colours. However, when it comes to light, red, blue and green are the primary colours

  • You mean magenta, cyan and yellow not red blue and yellow, because they are subtractive in nature,as in you remove color (take cyan and you remove all reds, then add yellow to remove all blues and you end up with green) while all electronic displays are additive in nature forcing you to use the RGB colors.

    Basically it all depends on your color gamut

  • @zeoverlord

    Yeah, I meant that, but it's just easier to say red, blue and yellow :P I'm lazy

  • if they use red blue and green for primary colors, how do they make yellow?

  • Mix red and green.. doh! Where were you at playschool?

  • Red mixed with green.

    Also,

    Red+Blue=Magenta

    Blue+Green=Cyan

  • lol red and green make yelow

  • Now LED TVs by Sony are the best TV on the market

  • this video is old

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more