A victim of a case of first impression in the US tax court has determined that property ownership runs with the original owner and not the newly appointed owner. Essentially, the liability falls with the original owner and the benefit of new ownership falls to the newly appointed owner. Using this reasoning, Palestinians are still the legitimate owners of the land, are liable for the taxes but do not received any of the benefits of ownership.
A case of first impression in the US is a cover-up of the partnership of the US government and the Zionist Jewish takeover.
mouradprotest 4 months ago
A victim of a case of first impression in the US tax court has determined that property ownership runs with the original owner and not the newly appointed owner. Essentially, the liability falls with the original owner and the benefit of new ownership falls to the newly appointed owner. Using this reasoning, Palestinians are still the legitimate owners of the land, are liable for the taxes but do not received any of the benefits of ownership.
mouradprotest 4 months ago