Wow, profound thoughts on the beginning of free will, and an interesting parallel thought on evolution.
Perhaps things like autism are the delayed, but gradual growth of free will inhibited or withheld by an unknown source or factor, unrelated to anything physical at all.
The only failure I think, is that even though his arguments were made in solid philosophic argument, he didn't see that the causality, act and potency views, etc., cannot coexist with the evolution theory. There are CRASS philosophy ERRORS in Darwinism, like the fact of having a potency to generate a more developed being than itself; by this, contingency is dead. But we know in all points that contingency is correct. Why should evolution be the only exception?
4:00
Wow, profound thoughts on the beginning of free will, and an interesting parallel thought on evolution.
Perhaps things like autism are the delayed, but gradual growth of free will inhibited or withheld by an unknown source or factor, unrelated to anything physical at all.
Minion066 6 months ago
The only failure I think, is that even though his arguments were made in solid philosophic argument, he didn't see that the causality, act and potency views, etc., cannot coexist with the evolution theory. There are CRASS philosophy ERRORS in Darwinism, like the fact of having a potency to generate a more developed being than itself; by this, contingency is dead. But we know in all points that contingency is correct. Why should evolution be the only exception?
pedrohqb 1 year ago