So because Obama was elected president, the US' official language is going to be Russian, the anthem will be changed of that of the Soviet Union's after Stalin died, and the 50 stars on the flag will be replaced by a hammer and sickle?
If you actually knew anything about Communism, you'd have used the Internationale (in ENGLISH, not Russian).
This isn't the Cold War anymore. If you'd stop focusing on Socialism and Communism, things wouldn't seem so bad.
Obama nor the Clintons nor the democrats are Communist. They are capitalists and imperialists with a sightly less fascitic approach than republicans so the republicans brand them 'communists'.
NEVER attach the word communism or hail them as comrades.
Obama was purposefuly installed to repair international public opinion after the image collapse of te US helped by the Bush administration.
@mindoasis11 You're misled if you think that President Obama was "installed." He was democratically voted into office by the American people, much to my chagrin. You're also misled if you don't think that he is at the very least a socialist. He believes in the redistribution of wealth, and feels that at a certain point, "you've earned enough money." Those are his words. That is socialism. He believes that government should run every aspect of our lives. That is socialism, and it is wrong.
@blackjohnwhite says: "He believes that government should run every aspect of our lives. That is socialism, and it is wrong." Nope. That is indeed communism! The Soviets called themselves "socialists", too. We've elected a junior Lenin!
@mindoasis11: Yeah? Well socialism IS the royal road to communism~ and they are all socialistic capitalists~ and WORSE than that~ they are all LYING, SCHEMING SWINE~ and I don't care WHICH political party they are from ! ! !
Hmmm, let me see, both ideologies preach that government is the end-all-be-all to all of life's problems. They both crush dissent with brute force. They both set up the State as God, and eliminate all other objects of worship from public life.
Neither one allows the individual to make one's own way. That's in a nutshell, is the definition of "left-wing."
We've been told for years in our schools that the Nazis were "right-wingers," but when you look at the practices of the National SOCIALIST Party, then you see that that's just not the case. Anyway, thanks for viewing my little attempt at political humor and commenting. We may not agree, but I do appreciate the feedback.
And while Fascism may not be identical to Communism, mainly because of it's inclusion of "corporatism, " it still stands for a "forced collective" body, rather than one built on the backs of willing individuals. Government takes over private industry, often disregarding set laws or even a nation's Constitution, for what the government perceives as the "common good."
Um, it seems you need to learn the distinction between NATIONAL Socialism, and Socialism. You cannot dissect the name and apply whatever connotations you want, that's not how it works.
And your response to Janine Robin just made you look like an absolute imbecile. According to the left-right paradigm its Right-wing thinking that is socially conservative and restrictive.
Please inform yourself before you make backwards comments and post idiotic videos.
LOL at this video. I love how ignorant some people are. I know what Communism is and I can say right now that both Hillary and Barack are far from it. They're both Social Democrat at the most, wanting to raise taxes to support social programs. Please, please, please read about what Communism is before comparing it to Hillary and Barack's politics. :)
They are closer to the European Social Democrat model than to Lenin's Socialism, Stalin's Comunism, or Mao's Chinese Social-Comunism. I agree, the problem lies in some powerful members of his cabinet or powerful supporters than are really Far Left and closer to Socialism/Communism. It is the influence of such a Far Left group that concerns really people. Attacking Obama or Hillary as such is just Conservative Red Baiting of their choice of political allies.
If Amerika dies, it will fall in on itself from dumbasses, jackasses, and angry haters without a clue. Go Dubya Bush! Go Sarah Palin! hahahaha, morons.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha, welcome to Unaited Soviet States, american assholes! I hope you will know soon all about soviet live, wellcome in 1917y, and i give one advice: dont give him your weapons, it be needed in civil war HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How ironic, Republicans call Clinton and Obama Communist, but it was George Bush who approved a take over of AIG, and now is pushing the government to use tax payer money to buy up debt.
In Obama's book, "Dreams From My Father," he repeatedly refers to his friend and adviser as "Frank." Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. anti-communist congressional committees, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several Communist front organizations
wonderful! This is america I would like to see! yeah! Workers of the world unite and win! Long life to Cheguevara! Long life to italian anarchists sacco and Vanzetti! Bread and sex for everyone!
Sorry. The greatest and most powerfull country in the world dosn't work that way. Nice that Italy is communist huh? Fact that we bailed you and the rest of Europe out of WW1 and 2.
When when was the USA's last military success, eh? And in WWII you were actually invade once at Pearl Habour. The last few times they haven't even been on Amerian soil!
very nice vid, soon the u.s will join her cousins and embrace world communism....ahhh the final piece to the puzzle. It took you a long time but finally you have gotten wiser, and know which system is superior.
So sorry to break the bad news, but the USSR passed away a long time ago and worldwide communism followed shortly there after. I heard Democracy is celebrating over 230 years of success in America though.
You fool, you are slipping closer and closer to a socialist/commmunist state and you dont even see it. Look at the government takeovers of bear stearns, aig insurance ect. all state funded sports cooperations. lol. next healthcare and ALL wages....get used to it fool...government owns you
You know, the nationalization is temporary? I can live without sports, and how can a democracy be communists? Their 2 opposite halves. Lousy close-minded liberal feminist. Go Sarah Paulin!!!
Nice. BTW, is this suppose to make fun of those people who are constantly saying the Clinton is a commie? And Lenin was way better than Clinton. FIVE STARS
"The church where Sen. Barack Obama has worshipped for two decades publicly declares that its ministry of Black Liberation Theology is founded on a 1960s book that espouses 'the destruction of the white enemy.' They quote Cone as saying, 'What we need is the divine love as expressed in black power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject His love."
Thank you. But just to clear up any confusion, I'm a capitalist and a conservative. I made this video as a pure satire of Clinton, Obama, and the Communist/Socialist/Marxist views that they espouse. But please, continue the debate.
Robbing from the rich to give to the poor? Seems pretty socialist to me. Shutting down media that dares to call your policies into question? That's pretty communist. Wrapping these views in a distorted version of religion? Well, shucks, ol' Karl Marx himself would be downright proud of that.
Both would try to enforce the "Fairness Doctrine" of media, which calls for equal airtime of opposing political views. That means that owners of radio and TV stations would not be aloud to choose what programming is run on the stations that they own. And before you use the "public airwaves" argument, remember, both NPR and PBS are paid for by the tax money of liberals, conservatives, and everyone in between, and only air left-leaning programming when it comes to politics and social discussion.
The belief that you and I as individuals have the power to write our own stories in life independent of government intrusion is what I'm talking about, Brez. The free market is a natural extension of free people making free decisions. All men are CREATED equal. What we do after we're created is totally up to us, and shouldn't be dictated by government oversight. Socialism takes the rights of the individual away, and as a result, lowers the integrity, prestige, and morale of the state.
According to social contract theory, government is a natural extension of free people making free decisions. I should think people like Jefferson and Rousseau would agree with that.
Don't exaggerate here. Government can do bad and good just like the market can do both bad and good. Socialism can preserve old rights and give new ones that a laissez-faire society cannot provide. The actual question is not which is "evil" or "wrong" but which you believe provides the optimal outcome on the whole
hmmm... thats a good point - optimal outcomes... why not look at history. Countries with mostly Marxist policies - least freedom, least progress (for the masses), most damage to the enviroment, rich get richer and the poor stay the same.
Countries with the most capitalist policies - most freedom, most progress (social, economic, way of life) most concern for the environment and have the capital to pay for improvement, rich get richer and the poor do as well.
Hmm, let's drop the talking points and straw men and actually look at history. Scandinavian nations all became social democratic welfare states decades ago. Since then they have become rich states with vibrant economies and societies. All Nordic states have higher per capita GDP than the US and studies indicate that they have longer-living, healthier, happier societies than America.
The choice is clear, create and elect a social democratic party willing to enact a Nordic-style set of reforms.
wow your ignorance and lack of facts is astonishing the us has a economy worth 13.84 trillion dollars all of Scandinavias economies might total 1 or 2 trillion dollars combined not even close to the wealth of the US.and the per capita gdp is actually only higher in Norway but Scandinavias population is like not even 50 million people the us has over 300 million so of course they are going to have more poor people and the dif in life spans is like 3-4 years next time you post use real facts
cksteele, you should realize that per capita, not overall, GDP is the only measure worth comparing between countries.
Fact:
GDP (nominal) per capita 2007 (per the IMF):
Norway #2 ($83,922)
Iceland #4 ($63,830)
Sweden #8 ($49,655)
Finland #9 ($46,602)
vs. U.S. #11 ($45,845)
Virtually all relative indicators show in favor of these countries. I use real facts, do you even know how to use them? All of those other studies can be easily found on the internet.
no you don't nominal gdp is without inflation so it distorts the value besides these countries have very small populations compared to the us so its not a valid argument to make the us has more poor which brings the numbers down but it does not matter the us has the #1 ranked economy while those countries don't even crack the top ten
yeah the us does have the #1 economy according to the IMF US over13 trillion dollars Sweden is 18 with 455 billion,Norway23 391 billion,Finland34 with 245 billion combined just over a trillion dollars yeah my game is facts that the IMF puts out btw only sweden is in the top 20
Wow, your idiocy leaves me speechless. First, you berate me repeatedly for using absolutes to compare the U.S. with Scandinavia (when I didn't) now you use an absolute (GDP instead of per capita GDP) to make a non-point (USA#1!!!).
I've posted both nominal and purchasing power parity statistics. My point has been made, but your inability to read or comprehend data and ability to make-up facts makes this is a pointless exercise. Go take a high school statistics course before you say any more.
#1 point the us has the #1 economy per gdp as per imf numbers ok look it up #2 you did claim Scandinavia better based on a higher per cap gdp#3 you didn't not post purchasing power parody ok#4 a higher per capita gdp is irrelevant Scandinavia's huge tax rates offset any gain in per cap GDP DO THE MATH! The average American has 7-10 grand more a year to spend because of lower taxes and lower cost of living therefore has more money than the average Scandinavian sorry maybe you need to go to school
Furthermore, I have never made this argument in absolute terms (like you keep claiming). The U.S. has higher numbers of people in poverty--in relative terms--than any of those countries:
U.S.: 17% in poverty (highest in OECD)
vs.
Finland: 5.4% in poverty
Norway: 6.4% "
Sweden: 6.5% "
(all data from OECD in 2005; if anything U.S. poverty rate has grown since then)
Anyways, I'd love to see where you're getting your "data" from. Perhaps the "vaunted" "cksteele Report"?
you use nominal which is not with inflation if you use the imf stats with inflation the numbers are much closer. besides as i said the higher taxes and cost of living offset the advantage Scandinavians have with per capita gdp. and if you take all the subsidies away from the nanny states the average Scandinavians is poorer than the average american. even the poorest americans own cars and homes that cant be said in Scandinavia
Ok, here's my last attempt to bring you back to reality and point out your contradictory statements:
I used both nominal and PPP (see my posts) and used per capita instead of meaningless absolutes like you (of course U.S. GDP is higher than Scandinavia, since the U.S. has 300 million people and Scandinavia 22 million). Your repeated use of irrelevant points would indicate that you would fail high school statistics.
Here's a fun and easy way to refute your "Scandinavian is poorer than an American" BS. Americans pay per capita over $7,000 dollars per year on health care, Scandinavians little to none out of pocket (already taxed at half or less that amount on average). Taxes pay for services people would otherwise pay for out of pocket. Scandinavia's lower GINI index also indicates that people on average are closer to the per capita GDP in wealth. Therefore, this argument, like all of yours, is fallacious.
once again you're ignorance and stupidity is boggling the majority of americans have health care through there employers only about 17 million don't while in Sweden they have a tax rate of over 50% on income ok so the notion that Scandinavians pay "little out of pocket for health care" is stupid they do in the form of massive amounts of tax
As for the "Americans have more cars" argument, this also is revealed to be pointless and fallacious. Yes, Americans have somewhat more cars (765 per 1000 people vs. 522 for Iceland/494 for Norway). But Americans need cars due to the way our transportation grid as opposed to commonly available and efficient rail and public transport in much of Scandinavia.
In the future, try to look up facts rather than make up facts, and learn how to be consistent and logical, since I don't see that now...
The United States is a great country in many ways, but not every way. There is no reason to use made-up/incorrect facts or illogical arguments to claim that "USA=#1!!!" in every conceivable way, because you cannot win that argument. Also, I'm confused as to why you, a Canadian (or not?), are acting as a knee-jerk American nationalist shill.
I'm done with you though, each unsupported statement by you is disproved by a supported paragraph of mine that is quickly brushed off by you...
ok well you ignore my posts as well even when i use imf numbers to prove you wrong the per capita ppp numbers by imf world bank us imf#8 wb#12 Finland #20 #17 Sweden #18#14 Norway#4#2 the us is 1 in GDP PPP of all the g8 nations the truth hurts but im sure you will ignore this and continue to bash the us and yeah im a Canadian and i have family in America and i have spent time in Sweden and i would much rather live in America and the opportunities it provides and i hate socialists and commies
Obama's secret shame at his family history of rape, murder and arson is what actualizes him. Our research is not yet complete. We are seeking to examine British colonial records. Our investigation to date has drawn on information on three continents.
"And what about Obama's beloved Kenyan brothers and sisters? None of his family was invited to Boston to share his prominence. Are his relatives being kept in the closet? Where are they? More secrecy, more prevarication.
I never have and never will own a Che t-shirt. A thug who kills those who disagree with him is no comrade of mine. Oh, I'm shaking in mah boots, Internet Tough Guy.
Shaking in your boots? About what? Did I threaten you? No ones trying to get tough with ya. I just don't think you are a communist nor understand the gravity of that position. There is no way of a communist utopia without the force suppression of the human nature to be free. True Marxism is impossible be it volunteered by the masses or mandated by the state
Do you really think that I have not thought of these objections already? Communism is a classless society in which the workers democratically control the means of production. It is no more impossible than democracy in politics. Dictatorship is contradictory to communism.
Huh? it's a dream world you would like to live in. Democracy is very dangerous and unstable. Democracy is a flawed form of Government. You can see that in our own countries problems of corruption due to becoming a more socialist democracy. We were never meant to be a democracy. So tell me sir how are going to eliminate classes without destroying individuality and without force?
Fabian socialism has been much more successful in advancing their goals than the more "pro-active" strains of communism/socialism which has gained great revolutions only too often become corrupted, become a failed state, cult of personalities, etc. More can be gained, sometimes, by stealth, patience, and gradualism then by overt revolutionary tactics.
in Das Kapital Marx wrote about a political phenomena. That the exploitative nature of capitalism will result in a revolution of the exploited classes who will insist in having a say in the ownership/organisation of capital and their own lives. He is describing economic conditions which will result in a revolution, not a political advocacy of the revolution itself. Others took his ideas and made theories of how best to promote revolution (or fight against it.)
...Is that an invitation to Montana? No, can't be...seeing that Montana is one of the most conservative states between Texas and Alaska. And what are you doing spelling "humor" with two "u's," are you an immigrant from the British commonwealth or are you just being pretentious?
Have you all ever thought, that it would be much better when TRUE communists would rule the world, especially the USA (which is the most capitalistic & imperialistic government with no real democracy)? Have you ever thought about, that this capitalists made this finance crash and now the whole world is in a crahs now? Who is in pain? The capitalists, which lost a few of many millions they have from the folk, or the poor people, which will loose their jobs now?
Ya, we're not offended. We actually find it funny that such stupidity exists, and the American Right Wing is THAT misinformed about communism and socialism. The fools still think Mao and Stalin were socialist/communist, ahahahaha.
Poor mindless drones that lack any sort of Autonomy. They have to rely on what they're spoonfed by the media.
Stop kidding yourself. Mao and Stalin were communists. And they were murderous thugs no matter how much you pathetic little apologists try to evade that fact.
Your philosophy is directly responsible for the deaths of millions in the last century, and you are too much of a coward to face that fact.
Actually, Marx himself never killed or harmed anyone. The true blame lies with Lenin, for inventing the concept of the "vanguard party", an undemocratic and unaccountable conspiratorial power structure. Lenin only intended it to be a "provisional government" structure until the Revolution consolidated itself, but he died and Stalin was the one who used it to create mayhem.
Marxism, without Leninism, is not responsible for anyone's suffering.
I am not a poor mindless person you are because you actually think Communism will ever actually work. It will never work in the sense that everyone will be equal.
communism will only work if people stop focusing on their own good, and focus on the good of others, and those in government not exploiting its people like ALL the stupid commies have done... but people are too self-centered for that owell..... we just need an insanely smart philosophizer to think of a new system that better than Capitalism and communism and all the others
Thumbs up if you wish this were true.
SomeoneCrazy2 6 months ago
So because Obama was elected president, the US' official language is going to be Russian, the anthem will be changed of that of the Soviet Union's after Stalin died, and the 50 stars on the flag will be replaced by a hammer and sickle?
If you actually knew anything about Communism, you'd have used the Internationale (in ENGLISH, not Russian).
This isn't the Cold War anymore. If you'd stop focusing on Socialism and Communism, things wouldn't seem so bad.
4ingP 7 months ago
Obama nor the Clintons nor the democrats are Communist. They are capitalists and imperialists with a sightly less fascitic approach than republicans so the republicans brand them 'communists'.
NEVER attach the word communism or hail them as comrades.
Obama was purposefuly installed to repair international public opinion after the image collapse of te US helped by the Bush administration.
And also gain the liberal and black vote.
mindoasis11 9 months ago
@mindoasis11 You're misled if you think that President Obama was "installed." He was democratically voted into office by the American people, much to my chagrin. You're also misled if you don't think that he is at the very least a socialist. He believes in the redistribution of wealth, and feels that at a certain point, "you've earned enough money." Those are his words. That is socialism. He believes that government should run every aspect of our lives. That is socialism, and it is wrong.
blackjohnwhite 9 months ago
@blackjohnwhite says: "He believes that government should run every aspect of our lives. That is socialism, and it is wrong." Nope. That is indeed communism! The Soviets called themselves "socialists", too. We've elected a junior Lenin!
alyosha24601 5 months ago
@mindoasis11: Yeah? Well socialism IS the royal road to communism~ and they are all socialistic capitalists~ and WORSE than that~ they are all LYING, SCHEMING SWINE~ and I don't care WHICH political party they are from ! ! !
teceyS3 6 months ago
@teceyS3 I'll share an old political proverb: "The welfare state is the prelude to the police state"
alyosha24601 5 months ago
@alyosha24601: I agree.
teceyS3 5 months ago
@mindoasis11 Comrade Obama is like an expensive coffin. Black on the outside - red on the inside.
alyosha24601 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russia we love you )) USSR
Rubens479 1 year ago
Obama is a pure fascist as same as Bush but the skin colour different. Thtas all...
workergirls 2 years ago
HAIL KING BARRY SOETORO, the Kenyan born, Indonesian adopted bi-racial person who usurped the presidency of America! ALL HAIL BARRY SOETORO!
NOTGLENNBECK 2 years ago
Wunderschön!!
Ein schön Traum!!!!
Grüße aus Budapest!!!
ygan72 2 years ago
Long Live Great Communism !!!
Long Live Marxism and Leninism !!!
Glory to comrade Stalin and Mao !!!
Long live Anti-Fascist Action !!!
Glory to Red Army and Partisans !!!
Death to Fascism !!!!!
workergirls 2 years ago
You do know that fascism and communism are cousins, right? Their both far-left wing political theories. Silly commies.
blackjohnwhite 2 years ago
@blackjohnwhite lol, you really need to remove your own comment before you realise how much you just embarrassed yourself.
Fascism is far LEFT? What school did you forget to attend, that is the funniest comment ever.
Fascism, my friend, is a far RIGHT wing ideology. It could not be further away from Communism if it tried.
JanineRobin 1 year ago
Hmmm, let me see, both ideologies preach that government is the end-all-be-all to all of life's problems. They both crush dissent with brute force. They both set up the State as God, and eliminate all other objects of worship from public life.
Neither one allows the individual to make one's own way. That's in a nutshell, is the definition of "left-wing."
blackjohnwhite 1 year ago
We've been told for years in our schools that the Nazis were "right-wingers," but when you look at the practices of the National SOCIALIST Party, then you see that that's just not the case. Anyway, thanks for viewing my little attempt at political humor and commenting. We may not agree, but I do appreciate the feedback.
blackjohnwhite 1 year ago
And while Fascism may not be identical to Communism, mainly because of it's inclusion of "corporatism, " it still stands for a "forced collective" body, rather than one built on the backs of willing individuals. Government takes over private industry, often disregarding set laws or even a nation's Constitution, for what the government perceives as the "common good."
blackjohnwhite 1 year ago
@blackjohnwhite
Um, it seems you need to learn the distinction between NATIONAL Socialism, and Socialism. You cannot dissect the name and apply whatever connotations you want, that's not how it works.
And your response to Janine Robin just made you look like an absolute imbecile. According to the left-right paradigm its Right-wing thinking that is socially conservative and restrictive.
Please inform yourself before you make backwards comments and post idiotic videos.
CEShannVfB 1 year ago
@blackjohnwhite
You are seriously misinformed. Fascism is far RIGHT. Silly Fox News listening Republican, intelligence is for left-wingers.
wowpapa 10 months ago
Better starve free than be a fat slave! FUCK OBAMA (& Hillary too!)
twombonu 2 years ago
LOL at this video. I love how ignorant some people are. I know what Communism is and I can say right now that both Hillary and Barack are far from it. They're both Social Democrat at the most, wanting to raise taxes to support social programs. Please, please, please read about what Communism is before comparing it to Hillary and Barack's politics. :)
InsertNameHereN0w 2 years ago
They are closer to the European Social Democrat model than to Lenin's Socialism, Stalin's Comunism, or Mao's Chinese Social-Comunism. I agree, the problem lies in some powerful members of his cabinet or powerful supporters than are really Far Left and closer to Socialism/Communism. It is the influence of such a Far Left group that concerns really people. Attacking Obama or Hillary as such is just Conservative Red Baiting of their choice of political allies.
56LC 1 year ago
If Amerika dies, it will fall in on itself from dumbasses, jackasses, and angry haters without a clue. Go Dubya Bush! Go Sarah Palin! hahahaha, morons.
vonKressenstein 3 years ago
Ha ha ha ha ha ha, welcome to Unaited Soviet States, american assholes! I hope you will know soon all about soviet live, wellcome in 1917y, and i give one advice: dont give him your weapons, it be needed in civil war HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jacquinot1982 3 years ago
How wonderful,the music,just,just great,and Obama and Hillary,below a picture of Che,wow i'm so happy,so happy.
ComradeWesley 3 years ago
Gets me everytime I watch this. Too bad the Democrats are on the right internationally speaking.
Scientisticsoviet 3 years ago 2
Good.
PhantomTigershark 3 years ago
Unbreakable union of freeborn republics, great Russia has welded forever to stand!
Created in struggle by will of the people,
united and mighty, our Soviet land!
Sing to the motherland! Home of the free!
Bulwark of people in brotherhood strong!
Oh party of Lenin, The Strength of the people,
To Communism's triumph lead us on!
Reavesss 3 years ago
How ironic, Republicans call Clinton and Obama Communist, but it was George Bush who approved a take over of AIG, and now is pushing the government to use tax payer money to buy up debt.
Reality must really bite.
noahkg1987 3 years ago
OH how i Yearn for such a reality in america
"COME comrade's the revolution calls !!"
komunismus je věčný triumf z lidu
коммунизм это вечное торжество народа
MinisterKGB 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Obama's book, "Dreams From My Father," he repeatedly refers to his friend and adviser as "Frank." Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. anti-communist congressional committees, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several Communist front organizations
bluecamaro98 3 years ago
Shining in glory for all men to see!!!!!!!!!!!!
UltimoLatino 3 years ago
wonderful! This is america I would like to see! yeah! Workers of the world unite and win! Long life to Cheguevara! Long life to italian anarchists sacco and Vanzetti! Bread and sex for everyone!
SubbuteoPeccioli 3 years ago
Sorry. The greatest and most powerfull country in the world dosn't work that way. Nice that Italy is communist huh? Fact that we bailed you and the rest of Europe out of WW1 and 2.
SeniorMinch229018 3 years ago
When when was the USA's last military success, eh? And in WWII you were actually invade once at Pearl Habour. The last few times they haven't even been on Amerian soil!
twizzer88 2 years ago
Speak proper english...
Spell your words correctly...
And use proper english grammar and maybe I will answer your question. And you think conservatives are stupid!?!?
SeniorMinch229018 2 years ago
Speak proper english...
Spell your words correctly...
Use proper english grammar...
And get your facts straight and maybe I will answer your question. And you think conservatives are stupid!?!?
SeniorMinch229018 2 years ago
Don't repeat yourself or use ellipses to form lists. What you're looking for is either a comma or a semi-colon. Also, yes conservatives are stupid.
twizzer88 2 years ago
Somehow, I don't think the US would be well-served by taking political advice from a nation that changes its government every ten months.
SCE2AUX 3 years ago
very nice vid, soon the u.s will join her cousins and embrace world communism....ahhh the final piece to the puzzle. It took you a long time but finally you have gotten wiser, and know which system is superior.
stickedU 3 years ago
bwahaha, thanks for the laugh
NightOwl30 3 years ago
So sorry to break the bad news, but the USSR passed away a long time ago and worldwide communism followed shortly there after. I heard Democracy is celebrating over 230 years of success in America though.
SeniorMinch229018 3 years ago
You fool, you are slipping closer and closer to a socialist/commmunist state and you dont even see it. Look at the government takeovers of bear stearns, aig insurance ect. all state funded sports cooperations. lol. next healthcare and ALL wages....get used to it fool...government owns you
stickedU 3 years ago
You know, the nationalization is temporary? I can live without sports, and how can a democracy be communists? Their 2 opposite halves. Lousy close-minded liberal feminist. Go Sarah Paulin!!!
SeniorMinch229018 3 years ago
Democracy = Dictatorship of the majority
Constitutional Republic = Democratically elected representation with protection of individual rights.
SCE2AUX 3 years ago
If only this were true.
starvingflame 3 years ago 5
well after waching this video....all i have to say is
VOTE OBAMA-CLINTON 08!!!!!!!!!!
jpo375 3 years ago
haha agreed!
voiceofthesoul 3 years ago
Yep Yep.
Scientisticsoviet 3 years ago
go kiss obamas ass
laxeron84 3 years ago
go suck mccains dick
FIFA07Addicted 3 years ago
Hillary was okay, Obama is better, Castro - Chavez are the best. Socialism is the only right thing in politics.
jacquelineveronique 3 years ago
Jackie likes murderous thugs, she just doesn't like people having firearms to defned themselves against them.
With the exception of law enforcement and sodomites, of course.
SCE2AUX 3 years ago
Nice. BTW, is this suppose to make fun of those people who are constantly saying the Clinton is a commie? And Lenin was way better than Clinton. FIVE STARS
altosax1st 3 years ago
what if they were really communists? better than your us capitalist scum
FIFA07Addicted 3 years ago
really hmm who won the cold war???
cksteele 3 years ago
what does that fucking matter??? nothing! soviet union´s destruction has one name: Gorbatchev.
FIFA07Addicted 3 years ago
"The church where Sen. Barack Obama has worshipped for two decades publicly declares that its ministry of Black Liberation Theology is founded on a 1960s book that espouses 'the destruction of the white enemy.' They quote Cone as saying, 'What we need is the divine love as expressed in black power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject His love."
HHH100 3 years ago
whatever,,,Rise Hillary Rise!
Ari33145 3 years ago
Great artwork!
KarlUshanka 3 years ago
Thank you. But just to clear up any confusion, I'm a capitalist and a conservative. I made this video as a pure satire of Clinton, Obama, and the Communist/Socialist/Marxist views that they espouse. But please, continue the debate.
blackjohnwhite 3 years ago
too bad you don't know what "Communist/Socialist/Marxist views" are.
Mockni 3 years ago
Robbing from the rich to give to the poor? Seems pretty socialist to me. Shutting down media that dares to call your policies into question? That's pretty communist. Wrapping these views in a distorted version of religion? Well, shucks, ol' Karl Marx himself would be downright proud of that.
blackjohnwhite 3 years ago
Obama and Hillary have shut down the media that oppose them? Dumbass, Clinton and Obama are too stupid and have too weak of minds to be Communists.
darthstew666 3 years ago
Both would try to enforce the "Fairness Doctrine" of media, which calls for equal airtime of opposing political views. That means that owners of radio and TV stations would not be aloud to choose what programming is run on the stations that they own. And before you use the "public airwaves" argument, remember, both NPR and PBS are paid for by the tax money of liberals, conservatives, and everyone in between, and only air left-leaning programming when it comes to politics and social discussion.
blackjohnwhite 3 years ago
And remember, Darth, it takes a weak mind to believe that government is one's savior and answer to life's ills.
blackjohnwhite 3 years ago
But apparently it takes a strong mind to believe that the market is one's savior and the answer to life's ills, right blackjohnwhite?
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
The belief that you and I as individuals have the power to write our own stories in life independent of government intrusion is what I'm talking about, Brez. The free market is a natural extension of free people making free decisions. All men are CREATED equal. What we do after we're created is totally up to us, and shouldn't be dictated by government oversight. Socialism takes the rights of the individual away, and as a result, lowers the integrity, prestige, and morale of the state.
blackjohnwhite 3 years ago
According to social contract theory, government is a natural extension of free people making free decisions. I should think people like Jefferson and Rousseau would agree with that.
Don't exaggerate here. Government can do bad and good just like the market can do both bad and good. Socialism can preserve old rights and give new ones that a laissez-faire society cannot provide. The actual question is not which is "evil" or "wrong" but which you believe provides the optimal outcome on the whole
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
hmmm... thats a good point - optimal outcomes... why not look at history. Countries with mostly Marxist policies - least freedom, least progress (for the masses), most damage to the enviroment, rich get richer and the poor stay the same.
Countries with the most capitalist policies - most freedom, most progress (social, economic, way of life) most concern for the environment and have the capital to pay for improvement, rich get richer and the poor do as well.
The choice is clear McCain 0'8
sputnik323 3 years ago
Hmm, let's drop the talking points and straw men and actually look at history. Scandinavian nations all became social democratic welfare states decades ago. Since then they have become rich states with vibrant economies and societies. All Nordic states have higher per capita GDP than the US and studies indicate that they have longer-living, healthier, happier societies than America.
The choice is clear, create and elect a social democratic party willing to enact a Nordic-style set of reforms.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
wow your ignorance and lack of facts is astonishing the us has a economy worth 13.84 trillion dollars all of Scandinavias economies might total 1 or 2 trillion dollars combined not even close to the wealth of the US.and the per capita gdp is actually only higher in Norway but Scandinavias population is like not even 50 million people the us has over 300 million so of course they are going to have more poor people and the dif in life spans is like 3-4 years next time you post use real facts
cksteele 3 years ago
cksteele, you should realize that per capita, not overall, GDP is the only measure worth comparing between countries.
Fact:
GDP (nominal) per capita 2007 (per the IMF):
Norway #2 ($83,922)
Iceland #4 ($63,830)
Sweden #8 ($49,655)
Finland #9 ($46,602)
vs. U.S. #11 ($45,845)
Virtually all relative indicators show in favor of these countries. I use real facts, do you even know how to use them? All of those other studies can be easily found on the internet.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
no you don't nominal gdp is without inflation so it distorts the value besides these countries have very small populations compared to the us so its not a valid argument to make the us has more poor which brings the numbers down but it does not matter the us has the #1 ranked economy while those countries don't even crack the top ten
cksteele 3 years ago
The U.S. has the #1 ranked economy? According to who, you, "cksteele"? But I'll play your little game.
Fact:
GDP (PPP) per capita 2007 (per the IMF)
Norway #4 ($53,037)
vs. U.S. #8 ($45,845)
while the rest of the Nordic countries round out the top 20. So, looks like you were wrong on two counts.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
yeah the us does have the #1 economy according to the IMF US over13 trillion dollars Sweden is 18 with 455 billion,Norway23 391 billion,Finland34 with 245 billion combined just over a trillion dollars yeah my game is facts that the IMF puts out btw only sweden is in the top 20
cksteele 3 years ago
Wow, your idiocy leaves me speechless. First, you berate me repeatedly for using absolutes to compare the U.S. with Scandinavia (when I didn't) now you use an absolute (GDP instead of per capita GDP) to make a non-point (USA#1!!!).
I've posted both nominal and purchasing power parity statistics. My point has been made, but your inability to read or comprehend data and ability to make-up facts makes this is a pointless exercise. Go take a high school statistics course before you say any more.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
#1 point the us has the #1 economy per gdp as per imf numbers ok look it up #2 you did claim Scandinavia better based on a higher per cap gdp#3 you didn't not post purchasing power parody ok#4 a higher per capita gdp is irrelevant Scandinavia's huge tax rates offset any gain in per cap GDP DO THE MATH! The average American has 7-10 grand more a year to spend because of lower taxes and lower cost of living therefore has more money than the average Scandinavian sorry maybe you need to go to school
cksteele 3 years ago
Furthermore, I have never made this argument in absolute terms (like you keep claiming). The U.S. has higher numbers of people in poverty--in relative terms--than any of those countries:
U.S.: 17% in poverty (highest in OECD)
vs.
Finland: 5.4% in poverty
Norway: 6.4% "
Sweden: 6.5% "
(all data from OECD in 2005; if anything U.S. poverty rate has grown since then)
Anyways, I'd love to see where you're getting your "data" from. Perhaps the "vaunted" "cksteele Report"?
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
you use nominal which is not with inflation if you use the imf stats with inflation the numbers are much closer. besides as i said the higher taxes and cost of living offset the advantage Scandinavians have with per capita gdp. and if you take all the subsidies away from the nanny states the average Scandinavians is poorer than the average american. even the poorest americans own cars and homes that cant be said in Scandinavia
cksteele 3 years ago
Ok, here's my last attempt to bring you back to reality and point out your contradictory statements:
I used both nominal and PPP (see my posts) and used per capita instead of meaningless absolutes like you (of course U.S. GDP is higher than Scandinavia, since the U.S. has 300 million people and Scandinavia 22 million). Your repeated use of irrelevant points would indicate that you would fail high school statistics.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
Here's a fun and easy way to refute your "Scandinavian is poorer than an American" BS. Americans pay per capita over $7,000 dollars per year on health care, Scandinavians little to none out of pocket (already taxed at half or less that amount on average). Taxes pay for services people would otherwise pay for out of pocket. Scandinavia's lower GINI index also indicates that people on average are closer to the per capita GDP in wealth. Therefore, this argument, like all of yours, is fallacious.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
once again you're ignorance and stupidity is boggling the majority of americans have health care through there employers only about 17 million don't while in Sweden they have a tax rate of over 50% on income ok so the notion that Scandinavians pay "little out of pocket for health care" is stupid they do in the form of massive amounts of tax
cksteele 3 years ago
As for the "Americans have more cars" argument, this also is revealed to be pointless and fallacious. Yes, Americans have somewhat more cars (765 per 1000 people vs. 522 for Iceland/494 for Norway). But Americans need cars due to the way our transportation grid as opposed to commonly available and efficient rail and public transport in much of Scandinavia.
In the future, try to look up facts rather than make up facts, and learn how to be consistent and logical, since I don't see that now...
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
The United States is a great country in many ways, but not every way. There is no reason to use made-up/incorrect facts or illogical arguments to claim that "USA=#1!!!" in every conceivable way, because you cannot win that argument. Also, I'm confused as to why you, a Canadian (or not?), are acting as a knee-jerk American nationalist shill.
I'm done with you though, each unsupported statement by you is disproved by a supported paragraph of mine that is quickly brushed off by you...
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
ok well you ignore my posts as well even when i use imf numbers to prove you wrong the per capita ppp numbers by imf world bank us imf#8 wb#12 Finland #20 #17 Sweden #18#14 Norway#4#2 the us is 1 in GDP PPP of all the g8 nations the truth hurts but im sure you will ignore this and continue to bash the us and yeah im a Canadian and i have family in America and i have spent time in Sweden and i would much rather live in America and the opportunities it provides and i hate socialists and commies
cksteele 3 years ago
so you are just putting Clinton's head in pictures of communists and fascists.....not presenting any real points.
yeah...one star
Matt482942 3 years ago
It's satire. Sorry if you didn't like it, but thanks for the star anyway.
blackjohnwhite 3 years ago
Obama's secret shame at his family history of rape, murder and arson is what actualizes him. Our research is not yet complete. We are seeking to examine British colonial records. Our investigation to date has drawn on information on three continents.
"And what about Obama's beloved Kenyan brothers and sisters? None of his family was invited to Boston to share his prominence. Are his relatives being kept in the closet? Where are they? More secrecy, more prevarication.
HHH100 3 years ago
Have you ever thought that communists like me might be offended by being compared to Hillary Clinton? We don't want her!
R3DF4C710N 3 years ago
Then tell her to stop using your party's platform!!! Just say NYET!!!
blackjohnwhite 3 years ago
Do you really believe in Communism?? I don't think you even know what is. Take off you che' shirt and get back to work like a good capitalist boy.
Windsblow 3 years ago
I never have and never will own a Che t-shirt. A thug who kills those who disagree with him is no comrade of mine. Oh, I'm shaking in mah boots, Internet Tough Guy.
R3DF4C710N 3 years ago
Shaking in your boots? About what? Did I threaten you? No ones trying to get tough with ya. I just don't think you are a communist nor understand the gravity of that position. There is no way of a communist utopia without the force suppression of the human nature to be free. True Marxism is impossible be it volunteered by the masses or mandated by the state
Windsblow 3 years ago
Do you really think that I have not thought of these objections already? Communism is a classless society in which the workers democratically control the means of production. It is no more impossible than democracy in politics. Dictatorship is contradictory to communism.
R3DF4C710N 3 years ago
Huh? it's a dream world you would like to live in. Democracy is very dangerous and unstable. Democracy is a flawed form of Government. You can see that in our own countries problems of corruption due to becoming a more socialist democracy. We were never meant to be a democracy. So tell me sir how are going to eliminate classes without destroying individuality and without force?
Windsblow 3 years ago
Fabian socialism has been much more successful in advancing their goals than the more "pro-active" strains of communism/socialism which has gained great revolutions only too often become corrupted, become a failed state, cult of personalities, etc. More can be gained, sometimes, by stealth, patience, and gradualism then by overt revolutionary tactics.
Truth1954 3 years ago
I agree that is more effective ( especially here in the states). I fear this is true. But no matter how you get there, it is still EVIL
Windsblow 3 years ago
in Das Kapital Marx wrote about a political phenomena. That the exploitative nature of capitalism will result in a revolution of the exploited classes who will insist in having a say in the ownership/organisation of capital and their own lives. He is describing economic conditions which will result in a revolution, not a political advocacy of the revolution itself. Others took his ideas and made theories of how best to promote revolution (or fight against it.)
Truth1954 3 years ago
I do believe marxism is EVIL. I think people should look at the ethical and moral aspects of politics rather than argue about the ideology
Windsblow 3 years ago
Have you ever thought that we don't give a damn if communists are offended or not?
SCE2AUX 3 years ago
You obviously have no sense of humour. :p
Off to the GULAG with you!
R3DF4C710N 3 years ago
"Off to the GULAG with you!"
...Is that an invitation to Montana? No, can't be...seeing that Montana is one of the most conservative states between Texas and Alaska. And what are you doing spelling "humor" with two "u's," are you an immigrant from the British commonwealth or are you just being pretentious?
SCE2AUX 3 years ago
Suprisingly enough, Montana is not a very conservative state. We were a swing state this year.
I'm spelling "humour" with two u's just caus I can :P
R3DF4C710N 3 years ago
Have you all ever thought, that it would be much better when TRUE communists would rule the world, especially the USA (which is the most capitalistic & imperialistic government with no real democracy)? Have you ever thought about, that this capitalists made this finance crash and now the whole world is in a crahs now? Who is in pain? The capitalists, which lost a few of many millions they have from the folk, or the poor people, which will loose their jobs now?
But Obama is no commie...
OEddiO 2 years ago
True communisim will never exist
reddog223 2 years ago
True democracy will never exist, too.
OEddiO 2 years ago
The USA isnt a democracy
reddog223 2 years ago
that´s why i was trying to say and to prove.
OEddiO 2 years ago
Yep,the U.S.A is Republic.
aldrickbarber35 2 years ago
If he would be a real communist, he would not be president now. Not Obama is ruling America, it´s the Mafia, capitalists, imperialists etc.
What the world would need is a revolution worldwide. If real communism & socialism would be everywhere, then the world would be better.
OEddiO 2 years ago
Ya, we're not offended. We actually find it funny that such stupidity exists, and the American Right Wing is THAT misinformed about communism and socialism. The fools still think Mao and Stalin were socialist/communist, ahahahaha.
Poor mindless drones that lack any sort of Autonomy. They have to rely on what they're spoonfed by the media.
darkshadyfigure 2 years ago
Stop kidding yourself. Mao and Stalin were communists. And they were murderous thugs no matter how much you pathetic little apologists try to evade that fact.
Your philosophy is directly responsible for the deaths of millions in the last century, and you are too much of a coward to face that fact.
Eat shit and die, you filth.
SCE2AUX 2 years ago
Actually, Marx himself never killed or harmed anyone. The true blame lies with Lenin, for inventing the concept of the "vanguard party", an undemocratic and unaccountable conspiratorial power structure. Lenin only intended it to be a "provisional government" structure until the Revolution consolidated itself, but he died and Stalin was the one who used it to create mayhem.
Marxism, without Leninism, is not responsible for anyone's suffering.
KennBurch 2 years ago
I am not a poor mindless person you are because you actually think Communism will ever actually work. It will never work in the sense that everyone will be equal.
reddog223 2 years ago
communism will only work if people stop focusing on their own good, and focus on the good of others, and those in government not exploiting its people like ALL the stupid commies have done... but people are too self-centered for that owell..... we just need an insanely smart philosophizer to think of a new system that better than Capitalism and communism and all the others
bashnslash 2 years ago
Laughing un controlably!
gnrdude 3 years ago