Mimicry and Resemblance ***Amazing Miracles Of Evolution(!?)

[hankymantip]

I feel like I just got rick rolled

[Throatjab]

your ignorance is appalling. there is ample evidence for evolution. richard dawkins recently released a whole book about it. as for scientists having 'no idea how life came from non life,' you can find a wealth of information on abiogenesis. all you need to do is look, but you refuse. nothing in biology makes sense except in the context of evolution. how dare you refer to it or its researchers as a hindrance.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

perhaps you should read

The Devil's Delusion

by David Berlinski

before suggesting Richard to other people to realize how many illogicalities Dawkins presents in his books

sure,if you can realize them

[HighFlyingDutchman]

sure,if you will read

The Devil's Delusion by David Berlinski first

peace

[kreliann]

this is called evolution, not divine work

[chorbster]

Your are misfortuned to be so ignorant. They know the chemical climate in which life began, from humble beginnings come great things. Fossils are everywhere and are of all differing ages, that is HARD evidence, all these are examples of adaption through Darwinism, not the genius of a conscience, anthropomorphic god, just LOOK at the evidence in favor logically and rationally!

[Brettkatze]

Where is the evidence that a "designer" exists? And, why should he draw pictures or faces on animals instead of giving them a weapon to defence themselves? That would be a waste of time, wouldn't it?

Prove it to me, that evolution is nonsense, or better, show me a proof that god does exist!

I can't believe that they still think in those ways! that is so ridiculous!!!

[Jeffenburg]

Genetics. Look into it.

[manutdsean]

GOD DOES NOT EXCIST-if u think u r a work of art created by god u really need to pull ur head out ur arse-just my opinion.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

lol

respects,then

[lappynet]

You don't really understand how evolution works do you?! I really wish people like you wouldn't try to spread ignorance rather than going and learning about something rather than telling everyone that because you don't understand it, it's wrong.

Just because you can't imagine the millions of years that it has taken all animals inc. us please don't ridicule those who can.

[1oneundergod1]

cap or din awry

had you thought i could reply

had you reason you could understand

i replied this way because i had two choices

i selected this means of response[as a concious choice]

you say natural selection is anything but random[but i was limited to two choices]

at random? [with my concious 'choice 'by my natural [non] selection that came from this box

i naturally selected this way because you responded to nothing else with fact

[Jeffenburg]

You obviously have no idea what natural selection is. Natural selection is not random. According to natural selection, animals mutate randomly. Then those random mutations are acted on by laws in nature. How the animals mutate is random, whether or not those mutations are carried on is not. Maybe you should of asked your imaginary friend to explain it for you.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

thanx 4 your help

we all know the imaginary systems of evillotion

so u may go on satisfying ur self wit it

peace

[Jeffenburg]

Actually, we have this thing called evidence. Look into it some time.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

no,i can't

because there are "amount of evidence" for evillotion

oh,sorry,evolution...

aaeee,and i can't get so much

lol

why am i wasting my time

i must be dumb or somethin'

[Jeffenburg]

Spell check is your friend.

[1oneundergod1]

you said'/..evolution, while blind, is neither random nor coincidental.''

[ie selected ,not naturally but by logical reason;methodoligy]

then

''Evolution is based on natural selection, which is anything but random.''

[nature by evolutionists is deemed by survival of the fittest ,but originating by chance]

i say by real logical selection[not 'natural, supra natural selection]

concious choices based on logic not nature

[CapnOrdinary]

Posting this as a reply would have been helpful if you actually wanted me to see it.

You're not making any sense. Are you saying that anything not random has to have a conscience behind it?

[1oneundergod1]

rampant athiests love to argue

you love to debate

its how you get your kicks

keep saying you cant understand

thiest baiting

your replies are simply insult

no attempt at factual rebuttal

just you and your cronies playing your games

nothing can make sense to you because it will upset your fellows athiest peers who will ridicule you by peer based ridicule should you dare abandon your non belief

[CapnOrdinary]

Wow, that was..... well, ridiculous is too kind an expression for it, but I'll go with that anyway. I'm a polite fella :P

Why would I want to make a factual rebuttal of anything you say, when you say nothing substantial, provide no facts, no evidence, when in fact all you provide is pure semantics?

[mistoline]

In fact, this totally works with the theory of evolution. An animal imitating even only parts of the looks or behavior of a predator or poisonous animal has a better chance of survival and reproduction - has a better fitness. The more refined this behavior or look gets, the better is the fitness. Hence, natural selection will favor these animals. In fact, ALL the points you're making are working perfectly well with evolution.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

wao,mistoline,stop right there

it has been a century since Lamarck was refuted ;)

btw,who did rate these comments? ;)

[123hussein]

mashallah

[Chrismoore1281]

The information is fascinating, until the wild creationist speculation.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

lol,i don't like those kinds of sentences,either,but i think the things in the video are not so logical to explain by blind coincidences.

[CapnOrdinary]

But then of course, evolution, while blind, is neither random nor coincidental.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

really ?

;)

[CapnOrdinary]

Yes, really. Evolution is based on natural selection, which is anything but random.

The fact that you can't understand it doesn't mean that it's false. You should learn the difference.

[1oneundergod1]

dear capNO what is natural about selection?

selection is a choice ,natural is a missnomer ,nature is survival of the fittest, but even here enters chance [the hand of god ] that deemed natural is selective ,selection is a concious [god?] choice

[yes 'which is anything but random']

evo-po=lution is blind [its adherants accord it to chance based [biased ] by 'natural and selection ,survival of fit-test

[CapnOrdinary]

Wow, that was a lot of bullshit in one paragraph.

Again, the fact that you haven't understood doesn't mean it's wrong, it just means you need an education. In something other than bronze age superstition, by preference.

[1oneundergod1]

it is good to be reminded of god who can create at whim , for mans reasoning such living beauty

forgive them god ,those who call it eve olution

they that deney thy miricle and chose to credit miricles to chance

to put thier trust in delusions of godless men

[who have never made even one new [living]verse like it]