In slavic countries there never will be a race mixing! In Poland or Russia white girl with brown baby is afraid of walking on the streets. Tolerance=decadence and vanishing of all values!
Nobody is saying we must flood African countries with mass immigration to make them more multicultural. Nobody is saying we must flood Asian countries with mass immigration to make them more multicultural. Nobody is saying we must flood Muslim countries with mass immigration to make them more multicultural.
Multiculturalism and mass immigration into White countries and ONLY White countries is GENOCIDE.
One's skin colour does not define their identity at all. Yes it would be a shame if we all looked the same as many people like to be individual and stand out, but the way we act is what matters. black or white, fuck it as long as your a good person. also... I don't think you need to worry about the white race being "rare"....lol just saying
No one says that a 100% Black neighborhood needs more diversity.
No one says that a 100% Asian neighborhood needs more diversity.
No one says that a 100% Muslim neighborhood needs more diversity.
According to anti-Whites, they are already 100% diverse.
All White neighborhoods and only White neighborhoods need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no White people left in them.
Anti-racist is a codeword people HIDE BEHIND to be ANTI-WHITE!
2:33 lets make the negro one the most rare, in fact it already is considering just a three race model
blacks abort their babies at three times the white rate and STILL have a higher birth rate - so we gotta expand abortion for them even more, in africa as well... lets raise the global IQ folks! thank you for your cooperation, especially if u r a stupid negro :)
Are white people dying ??? - Or are they just asininely puritanical ? - There are millions of people who are as white as the average Euro who are rejected as being white because they are deemed impure i.e. Jews, many Arabs, Turks [many are just Greeks converted to Islam], Iranians, Hispanics, Southern Italians, Portuguese, Armenians, come on.
Are white people dying ??? - Or are they just asininely puritanical ? - There are millions of people who are as white as the average Euro who are rejected as being white because they are deemed impure i.e. Jews, many Arabs, Turks [many are just Greeks converted to Islam], Iranians, Hispanics, Southern Italians, Portuguese, Armenians, come on.
@freddydahlgoldstein - True. I'm amazed at the ignorance of those who limit slavery's benefit solely to those with direct ownership. Many businesses profited greatly by dealing with the plantation. Many biz's used contracted out slave labor that they did not own directly. Come on ! - - Many non-owners, i.e. guards, overseers, slave catchers, slavery related-businessmen & their kin & friends, had a shot at free sex -- one major reason that roped many in to defending the plantation system.
Interesting video, I don't believe it's a hate video. What I will says (as a white male) that I could care less about the "survival of the White race". Does the Earth really care if full-blooded white people are gone? Also, black people say (and many white scientists) that white people came from them, so if this is true then WHITE PEOPLE WILL ALWAYS COME FROM BLACK PEOPLE THERE FOR THERE WILL ALWAYS BE WHITE PEOPLE AS LONG AS THERE ARE PEOPLE(!?) But who knows white could be as old as black(?)
@Compantino Another clever comeback coupled with a dash of wise words. Obviously, English isn't your first language, so you might appear even dumber than you really are. But I'm curious, what/who are you? What is your agenda?
@Compantino That's your comeback strategy? Sitting on your high horse and resort to name-calling. Great attitude and real maturity. Congratulations, you have failed twice.
@OppositeName i understand what you're trying to do and i respect the idea of preserving sth that means a lot to you. everyone has the right to do so. but at the end of the day, most people don't share your sentiments and it is just not realistic in this age of globalisation. you make it sound like other races are going out of their way to mix with whites. inter-racial marriages are still not that common and hardly have any statistical significance. so don't worry too much abt it yet :)
@Compantino Haha yeah, real stupid. In fact, almost as stupid as your attempt to give constructive comments. Go read a book and see who's stupid instead of embarrassing yourself. Come back with real arguments and then you can call me stupid.
preserving a race? is this supposed to be a joke? it's called evolution, as in "evolving", for a reason. just as in nature, this preserving of a race will only happen isolation. boohoo, the white gene is not dominant. survival of the fittest perhaps? if a race is supposed to be superior then why shud you have to protect/shield it from external forces? You don't see other races doing that
Black people sold other Black people from other tribes to White people. Slavery gets shit done. White people were slaves to other White people. Russian had occupied many countries back in the day and people were slaves to kings (czars) too. Stronger and more advanced always took advantage of weaker and less advanced. Even today, the smart ones sit in the office and do the paper work for 100k a year or more, while not so smart ones work in a factory all day for 10k a year.. there you have it
if this isn't some ignorant mess here...smh. Had to put a comment here since I was forced to watch this BS. I AM laughing at you @oppositename and your plight. How does it feel to try to prevent something that is NOT in YOUR control?? LOL :)
You are placing way too much importance on race. Skin color has very little to do with diversity. True diversity exists in ideas, culture, art, literature, music, cuisine, politics, religion, language, talent, and so much more.
Could you imagine a librarian saying, "We have a huge selection of books: red books, green books, blue books, yellow books, and purple books."
@DougShatter Wow, you might be the only one here who knows what diversity is. Sadly, skin color is what many define as race. Sure it's easier to separate whites from blacks. But try separating or Asians/Blacks/Hispanics by skin color alone, its not that easy anymore. Even in genetics, the differences are not conclusive what defines a human as this or that race. So you are spot on regarding diversity being more about values, perception and beliefs.
@DougShatter yes i can imagine that, they have black sections, but no white sections?
i've seen LGBT sections, for homos and other sex weirdos...
would like to see the white christian conservative hetero section, but of course that would be politically incorrect (thats not me by the way, not by a long shot
@Volksmusiker89 yes, like trannies, zoophiles, etc... don't u think they are weird, as in abnormal, strange, not average?
bizarre is another one... something most people don't understand...
yeah, now that transexuals are part of the alphabet soup of weirdos and their support groups whats next? pedophiles, zoophiles? what is the next group they are priming to expand their ranks of perversion and weirdness?
@Volksmusiker89 its at least weird by the level of practice, which for lifelong exclusive homosexuals is less than 1% of the population... Do u ignore THE NATURE OF HOMOSEXUALITY, a book, read it, then u will not be ignorant of homosexuality... as such the ignorance is for the rest of humanity as this book is referenced well over 2000 times as to peer review publications, etc...
Bigotry is quite often this hate thing based on irrational fears, that doesn't include me. u dont know what i know
@glorp896 Actually, I have read COUNTLESS books on human sexuality, and it just so happens that I am EXTREMELY well educated on the subject. So whatever you 'know', if it has lead you to believe homosexuality to be 'weird', then it's bullshit.
Homosexuality is normal. And 'normal' is not synonymous with 'norm' or 'most prevalent'. I don't suppose you know more about psychology than the APA, do you?
But the way you type makes it clear that you simply lack a proper education, like most bigots.
@Volksmusiker89 LOL, wow! thats great, its about time... this book has well over 2000 reference citations and is the most pithy thick referenced book i've ever read of a technical nature as to citations per page...
weird is a matter of abnormal to me... and lifetime exclusive homos are less than 1%, thus making them rare/weird - get it? i understand that homosexuality is part of nature, but still an abnormality... i understand that the field of psychiatry "normalized" homosexuality...
@Volksmus i'm very well educated and i type for efficiency and speed trying not to waste too many keystrokes... i've been published a few times, edited a book and had at least 6 100% research papers in college with at least two professors saying i should be published... i know how to write properly, i don't chose to in this medium, but apparently u deserve it? why do u continually write u as you when u know u is perfect while you is a waste of two keystrokes? empirical data doesn't equal bigot
@Volksmusiker89 Homosex is natural as u can observe it in animals in settings that have nothing to do with human manipulation however normality is not the same thing as natural. Normal refers to something that is intended by design, it is simply not possible in a sexually reproducing species to design homosexuality as a normal outcome and there is no evidence that it is normal in humans or any other species of record... Thats your short answer, anything else requires elaborate debate... u game?
@Volksmusiker89 i just wrote the last post totally dictated by the writer of THE NATURE OF HOMOSEXUALITY, do u wish to challenge erik holland? ye shall be owned! oh, he says no need to be arrogant, but hey, i say when u got the goods flaunt em, right? like SHOW ME YOUR DATA, problem never would have been as popular a catch phrase as the SHOW ME YOUR MONEY one... yes, i do know more than the politically designed argument from the APA as to normalizing homosex.
@glorp896 You're too much trouble. Next time stick to one, or at the most, two replies.
And you are CLEARLY not 'very well educated'. Published? HAH! Good luck convincing anyone over the internet of that with the things you say and the way you type.
But then again, David Duke even has been published...
But he's also much better spoken than you are, and from what you've said, I'd probably prefer his company to yours.
i am very well educated... would u like to compare IQs, take the IQtest dot com test...
I type just fine when I want to, but notice that i's (I's) are exactly the same as L's (l's), its one of the reasons i never capitalize my i's (I's)...
David Duke is probably smarter than u are, i'd guarantee it
u could learn alot from duke, in under 500 characters i have almost no expectation of eloquence, fine tuned writing or the standard u prefer
@Volksmusiker89 i've often made many imageshack challenges, which then require no luck at all as to proving merit, accomplishment, etc... did u graduate with honors from college?
take the megaexam as well, lets see if u beat my score...
i beat everyone of half a basketball court filled with people... hundreds...
i type for speed, i really don't care to be polished within this medium, but i have done so for some people that i think deserve it, u r not one of those people
@glorp896 The fact that you seem so eager to prove yourself as intelligent only serves to confirm my suspicions. Why are you so self-consious about your knowledge? You're quite quick to take the defensive.
No, I did not 'graduate with honors from college', I am currently a student.
If you really need to take that much longer just to write properly, it doesn't say much about your writing capabilities.
@Volksmusiker89 I'm done with and can only hope honesty will meet up with your anti-racism and defeat it. Was that a properly written sentence? What about that last one, was that a good one? ;)
Have a better life (oh wait, thats not a complete sentence, i need a subject and a predicate dont i? oh wait, maybe u can't tell that that dont is a don't because i skipped a keystroke... oh the humanity! u have no counter race debate so u attack me for other things, this is obvious
@glorp896 'Counter race debate'? What are you even talking about?
This discussion started over you refering to homosexuals as 'weirdos'.
And then you proceeded to explain that you consider them abnormal, using logic that, if followed, would also lead one to consider the left-handed to also be 'abnormal'.
@Volksmusiker89 If Homosexuality was normal, two same sexes would be able to reproduce. It doesn't take a college psychology class to figure that out. Stop trying to sound smart, because it isn't working.
@LuxurySwag Once again, a dictionary would really help you. 'Normal' has nothing to do with reproduction. Now, since we're discussing sexuality (sexuality being a field of human psychology), you're attempting to argue that homosexuality is an abnormal sexuality. Only issue is, you have no idea what you're talking about. No credible psychologist would back up your claims. Ask any authority on human sexuality, and they will tell you you are wrong.
@Volksmusiker89 I'm wrong? So you are telling me that two males can have intercourse, thus producing offspring? Keep trying to sound smart, but it doesn't change the facts mate.
@LuxurySwag Yes, you're wrong, and appearently quite dense as well. 'Normal' has no relation to ability to reproduce. We are talking about human psychology. One's sexuality does not impact their ability to reproduce. No shit two men can not give birth to a child together. That isn't relevant in the slightest.
What? Is homosexuality ''normal''? Do you learn anytime biology and evolutionary psychology? Can be the ''homo'' normal? And what ''psychology'' do you tell about? Modern liberal PC absurds?
@Volksmusiker89 do u know a few psychiatrists wanted to normalize pedophilia?
pedophilia was a mental illness, but then they said it is only if the pedophile is disturbed by it... after the laura Schlesinger incident they went back to their original stance... obviously psychology is a weak science that can flow with politically correct agendas more than hard science can...
@tokyocityrat Oh that just sounds delightful!! What will you do with them than? Use them as slaves? Beat them? Or maybe just bring them back to kill them? Pardon me if you dont mind but, I'd rather be called a racist peice of shit and I would rather die than have that happen.AND SO WOULD YOU!
If white people do not make natural reproduction, the only technical solution is to preserve in frege...otherwise, they will extinct within few centuries.
@tokyocityrat The only REAL way to preserve whites is to seperate races by agreement or my force. Stop massive immigration into our homelands and start worrying about ourselves instead of other races. This is what needs to be done, agree or not I am still right.
@BurningChariot how do whites define "homeland"? all races have traveled and migrated over the centuries. America was not always white territory. Certain parts of Europe are also not clearly defined once you move away from Anglo-Celtic and Germanic definitions. In Asia, it's even more complicated, eg you can see Chinese influences in almost every part.
I think its far sadder to give a fuck what our skin color will be in one hundred years. The human being is an ever evolving creature, only a religious nut bag, or a nazi takes stands for ridiculous topics like this. Glean your pride from your life's work, not your pigment.
@AvatarOfAvatar Racial mixing is not EVOLVING. Racial mixing is a form of de-evolution. There is a man and women for each race. Nature has made it that way,and thats how it should be.
@BurningChariot By all means, I would invite you to actually learn what the definition of evolution is... furthermore, I will leave that an open ended invitiation.... to learn :)
CHAPEL HILL -- A new study involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race had more health problems. De-EVOLVE?
@BurningChariot "Most of the risk items we assessed may be related to stress, and so we believe being of mixed race is a source of stress," Udry said. "From this work, we cannot identify further the sources of that stress. More research is needed to identify those sources and possibly suggest programs that might help biracial adolescents."
And that stress I would imagine comes from rednecks like you! lol
According to that same study, Asians are the master race, good work! lol
@BurningChariot If I want to read your cut and pasted garbage from your racist nazi web site, I will go there. Since all you can do to back up your ridiculous claim is post random and quite edited versions to try and prove your point.... you lose! You cant even speak for yourself. Nothing that you have posted is a result of evolution. Everything you have linked is a direct result of environmental influences. You have solidly proven that you dont understand the debate you are attempting to enter.
@AvatarOfAvatar "If I want to read your cut and pasted garbage from your racist nazi web site" It's actually a real article,not some nazi propaganda. ACTN3 (“alpha-actinin-3”), Chromosome 11, codes for fast twitch muscle fibers. The R allele encodes a functional copy of the protein but the X allele does not produce the protein; 25% of Asian populations are deficient, 18% of Europeans, but less than 1% of the African Bantu population. (Yang, 2003).
@BurningChariot Neat bunch of random and meaningless drivel. Now, again, back to your citing of Choi's studies. You did read her thesis correct? Didnt you? lulz... save it, I know you didnt, if you had, you would have never used it to support your racist and ignorant stance about devolving. Here, I'll post her bio... lol which you clearly didnt read before citing her as supporting your weak ass arguement. Epic Failure on your part...
@AvatarOfAvatar LCT (“lactase gene”), Chromosome 2, codes for lactase, an enzyme that catalyzes the digestion of lactose, milk sugar. An allele that enables adults to digest milk sugar arose in northern Europe only recently, between 5480 BC and 5000 BC. The allele was strongly selected and its possession by over 90% of northern Europeans may help explain how Indo-Europeans were able to spread so suddenly about 4000 ya. The vast majority of Asians and Africans do not have it.
How these preteens and teens manage family and peer group pressures and wrestle with stereotyping will often determine mental health and academic outcomes, according to research by Yoonsun Choi
@BurningChariot So, please, enlighten us all with how societal influence is the same as evolution. By all means, you have the floor hahaha! Quit just cutting and pasting things that dont support your statement, it just makes you look even worse.... which at this point is difficult to do! lol
@BurningChariot Again, your dedication to your quest of being the most complete imbecile is quite impressive. Since you dont even understand your own arguements, there is no need in me continuing to destroy your debate platform. Get up, go outside, meet some people, meet a girl, and throw out your Hitler guide. There is a world out there, and you are too scared to join it. Later!
@AvatarOfAvatar Forethought, the ability to plan and prepare for the future is closely related to the absence of impulsiveness. The savings rate among Asians is high, indicating increased planning and willingness to defer gratification. Drug addicts, children, low IQ people, and blacks prefer pleasures now rather than later, and typically have little or no savings.
@AvatarOfAvatar In a classic experiment, children were offered a small candy bar now or a large one later; most whites chose the large one later and most blacks chose the small one now. A number of observers of Africans have commented that their behavior is “child-like” – that they are similar to children.
@AvatarOfAvatar The inability to defer gratification leads to renting instead of saving and buying, theft rather than working and waiting, and rape instead of courting and seduction. The ability to plan ahead and defer gratification is critical to creating and maintaining a civilization, where the rights of others must be respected even if it means not getting something immediately when you want it.
@AvatarOfAvatar Blacks have the most sexual partners. 21 The sex drive of non-Hispanic blacks is 1.19 standard deviations (SDs) or 37% greater than whites, but that of Asian/Pacific Islanders is 0.124 SDs or 4% lower.
@AvatarOfAvatar The proportion of adults who first had sex before age 15 was highest for non-Hispanic blacks (28%), compared to 14% for both Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Only 6% of blacks abstained from sex until age 21 or older, fewer than Mexican-Americans (17%) or non-Hispanic whites (15%); 46% of black men and 13% of black women reported having at least 15 partners in a lifetime, more than other racial or ethnic groups.
@AvatarOfAvatar According to the CDC (National Statistics Reports, Preliminary 2006, Table 1), 70.7% of the births of non-Hispanic blacks were out of wedlock, compared to 26.6% for non-Hispanic white mothers. Africans have a high frequency of fraternal twins (up to 49 per 1000 births) 24 which indicates high promiscuity and low pair bonding.
@AvatarOfAvatar In the detailed surveys they completed, students could give more than one answer when asked about their race. Those who called themselves biracial tended to be more likely to smoke and drink, Udry said. Overall, older biracial children were more likely to have sex at younger ages, to have access to guns and to have poorer experiences at school such as through suspensions, skipping class and repeating grades.
Did you forget to add this part also? Blame it on whitey I suppose.
@AvatarOfAvatar Yoonsun Choi, assistant professor at the School of Social Service Administration.
Multiracial youths were 63 percent more likely than white respondents to have been in a fight and 65 percent more likely to have threatened to stab someone.
@AvatarOfAvatar The incidence of spousal homicide is 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages compared to intraracial marriages.” (Burnett & Adler, “Domestic Violence,” emedicine, Jan. 17, 2006). During the 10 year period from 1975 to 1985, spousal homicide rates were 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages. (Mercy, 1989).
@BurningChariot Well, not quite my friend. Scientific research has shown, that race itself is difficult to define, even by genetics or DNA tracing. Hitler tried HARD to find scientific ground for eliminating the Jews, claiming that their noses are longer or have other distinct features. But findings were never conclusive.
@Terminator97> How could u say something like that? Besides there are more "mixed" people considered black by people like you, and "free" blacks with "guns" in this country. On top of that our president is biracial! Stop living in a fantasy world. Be for real dude....
Your stats are deceptive. Only 5% of whites owned slaves near the end of slavery. Over half of the white population of AmeriKKKa owned slaves from 1640 to 1740 and nearly all of the white population took advantage of cheap black labor as a right of white AmeriKKKan heritage.
Whites would not let go of the privilege of Jim Crow Laws until 1965. Do you think blacks are stupid enough to accept your revision of history?
If you truly want t get along, try dealing with the truth.
Go look up the 1860 census. In it you will see that at the very height of slavery, the percentage of whites who owned slaves was 1.5. That's right, 98.5% of whites did not own slaves. It is the epitome of racism to imply that those people were just sitting around living off slave labor.
No free handouts today! Go get a job! Earn your way through life rather than demanding reparations just because you happen to be the same color as the slaves. You are not a slave and I will not be yours!
@HarTziyon You can waste your whole life for crying and blaming. good luck with that. People like you are more racist towards others than anyone alse. so get through your own complexes.
@HarTziyon Anti-White only the Super Rich could afford slaves, and that was less than 1%. So even 5% was a grest overstatement. Meanwile as much as 30% White folks in europe were Serfs(slave-spanish/serf-english,same word different language) belonging to the State. About the same for Blacks in Africa. Whites DID NOT enslave Blacks, Blacks did. They say they are Anti-Racist, what they are is Anti-White. Anti-Racist is a CODEWORD for Anti-White.
The notion that the average Confederate waged war to preserve slavery is a tenuous one at best. Only 6 percent of Southerners owned slaves, and 3 percent of those owned the majority. Recruits themselves referred to the war as "a rich man's war and a poor man's fight."
@HarTziyon it would be pretty hard to believe over half the agrarian south could afford slaves, i'm sure most of them were farming mostly just for themselves, some subsistence farming and a bit more... it obviously was big land owners that owned the bulk of the slaves... but of course i'm sure it was nothing like today as we watched our small farms get crushed for decades until it no longer became a media issue... where did u get your data? i book marked some of my references if u want them
"If the Child is nearly always 'Black' what then defines what 'Black' is?"
If you watched this and paid attention, you'd notice I explain this: White genes are not dominant. They tend to get washed out. The child really does show up genetically as black (not just visually).
So much for your assertion that this discredits the concept of race.
"In white and black coupless the child is nearly always black?"
Thats incorrect!! The child is just as much white as it is black even though the child may APPEAR to be "black." And a biracial child who looks more "black" does not make it any less white. The child is both races. The child would not exist without both races.
@LaMasChevere22 genetically speaking yes, the child would be just "as white as he is black". But that what appears, is what most people define as race. DUH
Actually, judging by the historical and psychological evidence, white women generally have to be deceived and guilt-tripped into wanting black men, which is why the occurrence of the phenomenon has increased with the rise of multicultural misinformation and anti-white racism.
@OppositeName hOLY FUCK, ARE YOU ON CRACK? Heres a simpler explanation: blondes like 14 inch black cock. Simple as that. No mental gymnastics or psycho-babble required.
@chefshitpiece Black men don't have 14 inchcocks, unless they are using the smaller endowed black men in porn. But personally I know black men with smaller dicks then me. I'm a blonde male, but I'm NOT dumb. There is a T-shirt out that says "Niggers love blondes", I'm assuming black males loving blonde females(?) I've had black females tell me I'm large. From what I can tell 7.5" does the job. I don't envy your 14" inch cock, esp. if its really thin.
white people are suffering because of their own success, womens rights are a main part of this.Instead of having a family, women are not getting married and not having children because they are involved in their careers. We dont have 10 kids because we know its not economically viable to do it, where as poorer nations seem to not know when to stop.
That was actually a good video with some nice points. This is probably one of the only vids about this subject that dont put races into a racial hierachy. Good job.
Nice info about slavery. Many African Americans think that every single white person was gung-ho about slavery. The truth is the majority of Americans during those days abhored the thought of slavery for obvious moral reasons.
And about the Causcasian population, keep in mind that even though the percentage will drop to the single digits, the overall population increases. There are still more white people today than there have ever been throughout history.
Great video OppositeName. Judging by the video, it looks like you are a White Nationalist.
BUT... "All we have to do is choose to let NO race become too rare." How are we going to do that without breaking the few guidelines you mentioned just before that? Impossible.
I don't consider myself a White Nationalist the way most people think of it. Actually, the definition is a bit hazy. Liberals define WN's as psychotic racists Nazis (how fair they are), and on the other end of the spectrum there seem to be people interested in separatism. I'm not sure that's necessary in any formal sense. All I want is for the racism against White people to stop. Our society has worked very hard at eliminating prejudice against other groups. Now we've gone far past fairness.
Regarding the prevention of any race becoming too rare, we COULD do it if we required white couples to have enough children that the number of white children equals the number of white parents each generation. Mixed couples can still have kids, but we maintain the numbers of pure-race children for each major race. I just think it's sad that some people would happily let one beautiful variety of humanity disappear off the Earth. Maybe it's because so many hate us for being white. (Racism.)
What about the poor Mestizos in Mexico and Central America? Millions of them were raped by the White Spaniards and the African Slaves they imported. Did the White man hate them for being "red". (Racism.)?
Who should they marry since the majority of Mexicans are not pure bred Native Americans?
What about Indians, West Asians (Lebanon, Syria, Afghanistan), and North Africans? Their not a pure race either, who should they fuck with? Eastern Europeans carry mongol ancestry and yes it is visible.
Not an easy situation, is it. Between you and me, I don't really care who they have sex with as long as they aren't spreading diseases; I DO care who they procreate with. I happen to value the blonde, blue-eyed look, and it's just beginning to be destroyed. I think we should try to prevent that. Of course, getting people to cooperate is another matter entirely, but the idea is at least possible.
Our society employs eugenics all the time. They just don't like the word for it. For instance, people with Down Syndrome are prevented from breeding because any offspring they had would also have their syndrome. We do this with countless other ailments as well. Are we really going to let an entire race of our species go extinct because we are scared of a word?
Interesting. But how can we preserve a certain group of people without be racist (discriminatory). I see the situation you are talking about and I'm over the "Who is superior" argument. But how can we be equal and fair and secure an existence for European derived people?
My thought on this is simply that we keep track of how many white children are born from one generation to the next. If the number drops, we give a financial incentive to white parents to have more children. We should be willing to do this for any race whose numbers are declining (hence it is not discriminatory, even if it's less likely to be needed for races whose genes are more dominant than ours). It's thus possible in theory to prevent a race from going extinct without banning miscegenation.
In slavic countries there never will be a race mixing! In Poland or Russia white girl with brown baby is afraid of walking on the streets. Tolerance=decadence and vanishing of all values!
religiofob 3 days ago
huh?
theblueroom99 3 days ago
I've seen the picture at :08
Marlene0013 4 days ago
Oh boy.. smh
MrAnimalLOVIN 1 month ago
i believe that diversity is an old old wooden ship used in the civil war era
nomorecakes 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nobody is saying we must flood African countries with mass immigration to make them more multicultural. Nobody is saying we must flood Asian countries with mass immigration to make them more multicultural. Nobody is saying we must flood Muslim countries with mass immigration to make them more multicultural.
Multiculturalism and mass immigration into White countries and ONLY White countries is GENOCIDE.
Anti racism is a code word for anti White.
Alphaman7100 1 month ago
Race is more than skin color.
But get rid of the hideous diversity fetish.
Love your people.
WhiteID com
TheWhiteEuropeans 1 month ago
One's skin colour does not define their identity at all. Yes it would be a shame if we all looked the same as many people like to be individual and stand out, but the way we act is what matters. black or white, fuck it as long as your a good person. also... I don't think you need to worry about the white race being "rare"....lol just saying
T1NAxTH3xGR8 2 months ago
No one says that a 100% Black neighborhood needs more diversity.
No one says that a 100% Asian neighborhood needs more diversity.
No one says that a 100% Muslim neighborhood needs more diversity.
According to anti-Whites, they are already 100% diverse.
All White neighborhoods and only White neighborhoods need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no White people left in them.
Anti-racist is a codeword people HIDE BEHIND to be ANTI-WHITE!
kontejners 2 months ago
2:05, no, we can do without the black one
2:14 we should
2:21 we should
2:25 we should
2:33 lets make the negro one the most rare, in fact it already is considering just a three race model
blacks abort their babies at three times the white rate and STILL have a higher birth rate - so we gotta expand abortion for them even more, in africa as well... lets raise the global IQ folks! thank you for your cooperation, especially if u r a stupid negro :)
glorp896 3 months ago
diversity? LMFAO
niggers kill humans every day
espeically whites
and you are saying diversity? lol
those apes need to go back to africa
TheGrizzlyReaper78 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are white people dying ??? - Or are they just asininely puritanical ? - There are millions of people who are as white as the average Euro who are rejected as being white because they are deemed impure i.e. Jews, many Arabs, Turks [many are just Greeks converted to Islam], Iranians, Hispanics, Southern Italians, Portuguese, Armenians, come on.
afro747 3 months ago
Are white people dying ??? - Or are they just asininely puritanical ? - There are millions of people who are as white as the average Euro who are rejected as being white because they are deemed impure i.e. Jews, many Arabs, Turks [many are just Greeks converted to Islam], Iranians, Hispanics, Southern Italians, Portuguese, Armenians, come on.
afro747 3 months ago
@freddydahlgoldstein - True. I'm amazed at the ignorance of those who limit slavery's benefit solely to those with direct ownership. Many businesses profited greatly by dealing with the plantation. Many biz's used contracted out slave labor that they did not own directly. Come on ! - - Many non-owners, i.e. guards, overseers, slave catchers, slavery related-businessmen & their kin & friends, had a shot at free sex -- one major reason that roped many in to defending the plantation system.
afro747 3 months ago
This video sucks and is racist.
tysonreidfull 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Multiculturalism and mass immigration into white countries and white countries only is GENOCIDE.
Anti racism is a code word for anti white.
Alphaman7100 4 months ago
Most of the slave owners were Jews, how else do you think all them Jewish banks on Wall St made all their money.
Alphaman7100 4 months ago 8
i dont think this is diversity. i think this is racism.
moreifroncis 4 months ago
Interesting video, I don't believe it's a hate video. What I will says (as a white male) that I could care less about the "survival of the White race". Does the Earth really care if full-blooded white people are gone? Also, black people say (and many white scientists) that white people came from them, so if this is true then WHITE PEOPLE WILL ALWAYS COME FROM BLACK PEOPLE THERE FOR THERE WILL ALWAYS BE WHITE PEOPLE AS LONG AS THERE ARE PEOPLE(!?) But who knows white could be as old as black(?)
Rosktron 6 months ago
slavery is not all about black and white people in fact a slave being black is just a stereotype used by people
horrormation 7 months ago
@Compantino Another clever comeback coupled with a dash of wise words. Obviously, English isn't your first language, so you might appear even dumber than you really are. But I'm curious, what/who are you? What is your agenda?
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
@Compantino That's your comeback strategy? Sitting on your high horse and resort to name-calling. Great attitude and real maturity. Congratulations, you have failed twice.
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
@OppositeName i understand what you're trying to do and i respect the idea of preserving sth that means a lot to you. everyone has the right to do so. but at the end of the day, most people don't share your sentiments and it is just not realistic in this age of globalisation. you make it sound like other races are going out of their way to mix with whites. inter-racial marriages are still not that common and hardly have any statistical significance. so don't worry too much abt it yet :)
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
@Compantino Haha yeah, real stupid. In fact, almost as stupid as your attempt to give constructive comments. Go read a book and see who's stupid instead of embarrassing yourself. Come back with real arguments and then you can call me stupid.
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
Comment removed
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
preserving a race? is this supposed to be a joke? it's called evolution, as in "evolving", for a reason. just as in nature, this preserving of a race will only happen isolation. boohoo, the white gene is not dominant. survival of the fittest perhaps? if a race is supposed to be superior then why shud you have to protect/shield it from external forces? You don't see other races doing that
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whites are barely 8% of the world and dropping. Rapidly.
Our birth rates are incredibly low and our governments are replacing our people with non-Europeans. En masse.
The ultra-leftists may be sincere in trying to create a 'blended humanity' but they are doing it in ONLY white nations.
They are intentionally abusing the current situation to push their racial agenda.
It is GENOCIDE as described by international law.
KumarZimmerman08 9 months ago
Black people sold other Black people from other tribes to White people. Slavery gets shit done. White people were slaves to other White people. Russian had occupied many countries back in the day and people were slaves to kings (czars) too. Stronger and more advanced always took advantage of weaker and less advanced. Even today, the smart ones sit in the office and do the paper work for 100k a year or more, while not so smart ones work in a factory all day for 10k a year.. there you have it
edvinastox 11 months ago
if this isn't some ignorant mess here...smh. Had to put a comment here since I was forced to watch this BS. I AM laughing at you @oppositename and your plight. How does it feel to try to prevent something that is NOT in YOUR control?? LOL :)
alwaysearchin 1 year ago
You are placing way too much importance on race. Skin color has very little to do with diversity. True diversity exists in ideas, culture, art, literature, music, cuisine, politics, religion, language, talent, and so much more.
Could you imagine a librarian saying, "We have a huge selection of books: red books, green books, blue books, yellow books, and purple books."
DougShatter 1 year ago 10
@DougShatter Wow, you might be the only one here who knows what diversity is. Sadly, skin color is what many define as race. Sure it's easier to separate whites from blacks. But try separating or Asians/Blacks/Hispanics by skin color alone, its not that easy anymore. Even in genetics, the differences are not conclusive what defines a human as this or that race. So you are spot on regarding diversity being more about values, perception and beliefs.
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
@DougShatter yes i can imagine that, they have black sections, but no white sections?
i've seen LGBT sections, for homos and other sex weirdos...
would like to see the white christian conservative hetero section, but of course that would be politically incorrect (thats not me by the way, not by a long shot
glorp896 3 months ago
@glorp896 'Sex weirdos'..?
Volksmusiker89 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 yes, like trannies, zoophiles, etc... don't u think they are weird, as in abnormal, strange, not average?
bizarre is another one... something most people don't understand...
yeah, now that transexuals are part of the alphabet soup of weirdos and their support groups whats next? pedophiles, zoophiles? what is the next group they are priming to expand their ranks of perversion and weirdness?
glorp896 3 months ago
@glorp896 No, I do not think that homosexuality is 'weird'.
I think that bigotry and ignorance are laughable, however. Yours in particular.
Get an education, or at least stick to talking about subjects you know and understand.
Volksmusiker89 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 its at least weird by the level of practice, which for lifelong exclusive homosexuals is less than 1% of the population... Do u ignore THE NATURE OF HOMOSEXUALITY, a book, read it, then u will not be ignorant of homosexuality... as such the ignorance is for the rest of humanity as this book is referenced well over 2000 times as to peer review publications, etc...
Bigotry is quite often this hate thing based on irrational fears, that doesn't include me. u dont know what i know
glorp896 3 months ago
@glorp896 Actually, I have read COUNTLESS books on human sexuality, and it just so happens that I am EXTREMELY well educated on the subject. So whatever you 'know', if it has lead you to believe homosexuality to be 'weird', then it's bullshit.
Homosexuality is normal. And 'normal' is not synonymous with 'norm' or 'most prevalent'. I don't suppose you know more about psychology than the APA, do you?
But the way you type makes it clear that you simply lack a proper education, like most bigots.
Volksmusiker89 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 LOL, wow! thats great, its about time... this book has well over 2000 reference citations and is the most pithy thick referenced book i've ever read of a technical nature as to citations per page...
weird is a matter of abnormal to me... and lifetime exclusive homos are less than 1%, thus making them rare/weird - get it? i understand that homosexuality is part of nature, but still an abnormality... i understand that the field of psychiatry "normalized" homosexuality...
glorp896 3 months ago
@Volksmus i'm very well educated and i type for efficiency and speed trying not to waste too many keystrokes... i've been published a few times, edited a book and had at least 6 100% research papers in college with at least two professors saying i should be published... i know how to write properly, i don't chose to in this medium, but apparently u deserve it? why do u continually write u as you when u know u is perfect while you is a waste of two keystrokes? empirical data doesn't equal bigot
glorp896 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 Homosex is natural as u can observe it in animals in settings that have nothing to do with human manipulation however normality is not the same thing as natural. Normal refers to something that is intended by design, it is simply not possible in a sexually reproducing species to design homosexuality as a normal outcome and there is no evidence that it is normal in humans or any other species of record... Thats your short answer, anything else requires elaborate debate... u game?
glorp896 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 i just wrote the last post totally dictated by the writer of THE NATURE OF HOMOSEXUALITY, do u wish to challenge erik holland? ye shall be owned! oh, he says no need to be arrogant, but hey, i say when u got the goods flaunt em, right? like SHOW ME YOUR DATA, problem never would have been as popular a catch phrase as the SHOW ME YOUR MONEY one... yes, i do know more than the politically designed argument from the APA as to normalizing homosex.
glorp896 3 months ago
@glorp896 should have been a colon after problem - no 100% for that post!
glorp896 3 months ago
@glorp896 You're too much trouble. Next time stick to one, or at the most, two replies.
And you are CLEARLY not 'very well educated'. Published? HAH! Good luck convincing anyone over the internet of that with the things you say and the way you type.
But then again, David Duke even has been published...
But he's also much better spoken than you are, and from what you've said, I'd probably prefer his company to yours.
Volksmusiker89 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 no, the negros are.
i am very well educated... would u like to compare IQs, take the IQtest dot com test...
I type just fine when I want to, but notice that i's (I's) are exactly the same as L's (l's), its one of the reasons i never capitalize my i's (I's)...
David Duke is probably smarter than u are, i'd guarantee it
u could learn alot from duke, in under 500 characters i have almost no expectation of eloquence, fine tuned writing or the standard u prefer
glorp896 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 i've often made many imageshack challenges, which then require no luck at all as to proving merit, accomplishment, etc... did u graduate with honors from college?
take the megaexam as well, lets see if u beat my score...
i beat everyone of half a basketball court filled with people... hundreds...
i type for speed, i really don't care to be polished within this medium, but i have done so for some people that i think deserve it, u r not one of those people
glorp896 3 months ago
@glorp896 The fact that you seem so eager to prove yourself as intelligent only serves to confirm my suspicions. Why are you so self-consious about your knowledge? You're quite quick to take the defensive.
No, I did not 'graduate with honors from college', I am currently a student.
If you really need to take that much longer just to write properly, it doesn't say much about your writing capabilities.
Volksmusiker89 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 I'm done with and can only hope honesty will meet up with your anti-racism and defeat it. Was that a properly written sentence? What about that last one, was that a good one? ;)
Have a better life (oh wait, thats not a complete sentence, i need a subject and a predicate dont i? oh wait, maybe u can't tell that that dont is a don't because i skipped a keystroke... oh the humanity! u have no counter race debate so u attack me for other things, this is obvious
glorp896 3 months ago
@glorp896 'Counter race debate'? What are you even talking about?
This discussion started over you refering to homosexuals as 'weirdos'.
And then you proceeded to explain that you consider them abnormal, using logic that, if followed, would also lead one to consider the left-handed to also be 'abnormal'.
Volksmusiker89 3 months ago
@Volksmusiker89 Homosexuals ARE abnormal....
LuxurySwag 1 week ago
@LuxurySwag Do you own a dictionary? Are you aquainted with the definition of 'abnormal'?
Perhaps you should take a few courses on psychology, seeing as how you have no idea what you're talking about.
Volksmusiker89 1 week ago
@Volksmusiker89 If Homosexuality was normal, two same sexes would be able to reproduce. It doesn't take a college psychology class to figure that out. Stop trying to sound smart, because it isn't working.
LuxurySwag 1 week ago
@LuxurySwag Once again, a dictionary would really help you. 'Normal' has nothing to do with reproduction. Now, since we're discussing sexuality (sexuality being a field of human psychology), you're attempting to argue that homosexuality is an abnormal sexuality. Only issue is, you have no idea what you're talking about. No credible psychologist would back up your claims. Ask any authority on human sexuality, and they will tell you you are wrong.
And you are.
Volksmusiker89 1 week ago
@Volksmusiker89 I'm wrong? So you are telling me that two males can have intercourse, thus producing offspring? Keep trying to sound smart, but it doesn't change the facts mate.
LuxurySwag 1 week ago
Comment removed
Volksmusiker89 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LuxurySwag Yes, you're wrong, and appearently quite dense as well. 'Normal' has no relation to ability to reproduce. We are talking about human psychology. One's sexuality does not impact their ability to reproduce. No shit two men can not give birth to a child together. That isn't relevant in the slightest.
Volksmusiker89 1 week ago
@Volksmusiker89
What? Is homosexuality ''normal''? Do you learn anytime biology and evolutionary psychology? Can be the ''homo'' normal? And what ''psychology'' do you tell about? Modern liberal PC absurds?
religiofob 3 days ago
@Volksmusiker89 do u know a few psychiatrists wanted to normalize pedophilia?
pedophilia was a mental illness, but then they said it is only if the pedophile is disturbed by it... after the laura Schlesinger incident they went back to their original stance... obviously psychology is a weak science that can flow with politically correct agendas more than hard science can...
glorp896 3 months ago
we can preserve eggs and sperm of white people anytime and reproduce them anytime.
tokyocityrat 1 year ago
@tokyocityrat Oh that just sounds delightful!! What will you do with them than? Use them as slaves? Beat them? Or maybe just bring them back to kill them? Pardon me if you dont mind but, I'd rather be called a racist peice of shit and I would rather die than have that happen.AND SO WOULD YOU!
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot
If white people do not make natural reproduction, the only technical solution is to preserve in frege...otherwise, they will extinct within few centuries.
tokyocityrat 1 year ago
@tokyocityrat The only REAL way to preserve whites is to seperate races by agreement or my force. Stop massive immigration into our homelands and start worrying about ourselves instead of other races. This is what needs to be done, agree or not I am still right.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot how do whites define "homeland"? all races have traveled and migrated over the centuries. America was not always white territory. Certain parts of Europe are also not clearly defined once you move away from Anglo-Celtic and Germanic definitions. In Asia, it's even more complicated, eg you can see Chinese influences in almost every part.
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
I think its far sadder to give a fuck what our skin color will be in one hundred years. The human being is an ever evolving creature, only a religious nut bag, or a nazi takes stands for ridiculous topics like this. Glean your pride from your life's work, not your pigment.
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar Racial mixing is not EVOLVING. Racial mixing is a form of de-evolution. There is a man and women for each race. Nature has made it that way,and thats how it should be.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot By all means, I would invite you to actually learn what the definition of evolution is... furthermore, I will leave that an open ended invitiation.... to learn :)
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar Well by all means go ahead and tell me :)
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar By DAVID WILLIAMSON
UNC News Services
CHAPEL HILL -- A new study involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race had more health problems. De-EVOLVE?
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot "Most of the risk items we assessed may be related to stress, and so we believe being of mixed race is a source of stress," Udry said. "From this work, we cannot identify further the sources of that stress. More research is needed to identify those sources and possibly suggest programs that might help biracial adolescents."
And that stress I would imagine comes from rednecks like you! lol
According to that same study, Asians are the master race, good work! lol
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar "And that stress I would imagine comes from rednecks like you!" Throwing pee pee tantrums will get you no where buddy.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot If I want to read your cut and pasted garbage from your racist nazi web site, I will go there. Since all you can do to back up your ridiculous claim is post random and quite edited versions to try and prove your point.... you lose! You cant even speak for yourself. Nothing that you have posted is a result of evolution. Everything you have linked is a direct result of environmental influences. You have solidly proven that you dont understand the debate you are attempting to enter.
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar "If I want to read your cut and pasted garbage from your racist nazi web site" It's actually a real article,not some nazi propaganda. ACTN3 (“alpha-actinin-3”), Chromosome 11, codes for fast twitch muscle fibers. The R allele encodes a functional copy of the protein but the X allele does not produce the protein; 25% of Asian populations are deficient, 18% of Europeans, but less than 1% of the African Bantu population. (Yang, 2003).
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot Neat bunch of random and meaningless drivel. Now, again, back to your citing of Choi's studies. You did read her thesis correct? Didnt you? lulz... save it, I know you didnt, if you had, you would have never used it to support your racist and ignorant stance about devolving. Here, I'll post her bio... lol which you clearly didnt read before citing her as supporting your weak ass arguement. Epic Failure on your part...
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar LCT (“lactase gene”), Chromosome 2, codes for lactase, an enzyme that catalyzes the digestion of lactose, milk sugar. An allele that enables adults to digest milk sugar arose in northern Europe only recently, between 5480 BC and 5000 BC. The allele was strongly selected and its possession by over 90% of northern Europeans may help explain how Indo-Europeans were able to spread so suddenly about 4000 ya. The vast majority of Asians and Africans do not have it.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot Here ya go slick...
How these preteens and teens manage family and peer group pressures and wrestle with stereotyping will often determine mental health and academic outcomes, according to research by Yoonsun Choi
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
@BurningChariot So, please, enlighten us all with how societal influence is the same as evolution. By all means, you have the floor hahaha! Quit just cutting and pasting things that dont support your statement, it just makes you look even worse.... which at this point is difficult to do! lol
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar That's because your too simple minded to put 2 and 2 together here let me make it easy simpleton.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot Again, your dedication to your quest of being the most complete imbecile is quite impressive. Since you dont even understand your own arguements, there is no need in me continuing to destroy your debate platform. Get up, go outside, meet some people, meet a girl, and throw out your Hitler guide. There is a world out there, and you are too scared to join it. Later!
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar Exactly talk shit rather than read and or comprehend. If I cant make you understand in simple terms why even try.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar Forethought, the ability to plan and prepare for the future is closely related to the absence of impulsiveness. The savings rate among Asians is high, indicating increased planning and willingness to defer gratification. Drug addicts, children, low IQ people, and blacks prefer pleasures now rather than later, and typically have little or no savings.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar In a classic experiment, children were offered a small candy bar now or a large one later; most whites chose the large one later and most blacks chose the small one now. A number of observers of Africans have commented that their behavior is “child-like” – that they are similar to children.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar The inability to defer gratification leads to renting instead of saving and buying, theft rather than working and waiting, and rape instead of courting and seduction. The ability to plan ahead and defer gratification is critical to creating and maintaining a civilization, where the rights of others must be respected even if it means not getting something immediately when you want it.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar Blacks have the most sexual partners. 21 The sex drive of non-Hispanic blacks is 1.19 standard deviations (SDs) or 37% greater than whites, but that of Asian/Pacific Islanders is 0.124 SDs or 4% lower.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar The proportion of adults who first had sex before age 15 was highest for non-Hispanic blacks (28%), compared to 14% for both Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Only 6% of blacks abstained from sex until age 21 or older, fewer than Mexican-Americans (17%) or non-Hispanic whites (15%); 46% of black men and 13% of black women reported having at least 15 partners in a lifetime, more than other racial or ethnic groups.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar According to the CDC (National Statistics Reports, Preliminary 2006, Table 1), 70.7% of the births of non-Hispanic blacks were out of wedlock, compared to 26.6% for non-Hispanic white mothers. Africans have a high frequency of fraternal twins (up to 49 per 1000 births) 24 which indicates high promiscuity and low pair bonding.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar In the detailed surveys they completed, students could give more than one answer when asked about their race. Those who called themselves biracial tended to be more likely to smoke and drink, Udry said. Overall, older biracial children were more likely to have sex at younger ages, to have access to guns and to have poorer experiences at school such as through suspensions, skipping class and repeating grades.
Did you forget to add this part also? Blame it on whitey I suppose.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar Yoonsun Choi, assistant professor at the School of Social Service Administration.
Multiracial youths were 63 percent more likely than white respondents to have been in a fight and 65 percent more likely to have threatened to stab someone.
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@AvatarOfAvatar The incidence of spousal homicide is 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages compared to intraracial marriages.” (Burnett & Adler, “Domestic Violence,” emedicine, Jan. 17, 2006). During the 10 year period from 1975 to 1985, spousal homicide rates were 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages. (Mercy, 1989).
BurningChariot 1 year ago
@BurningChariot Well, not quite my friend. Scientific research has shown, that race itself is difficult to define, even by genetics or DNA tracing. Hitler tried HARD to find scientific ground for eliminating the Jews, claiming that their noses are longer or have other distinct features. But findings were never conclusive.
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One day the time will come when the americans will recognize that the DEATH OF THEIR COUNTRY AND PEOPLES is almost here.
And on that day we will RISE UP and KILL ALL THE NIGGERS AND JEWS
TheTerminator97 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
Ralowski 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Terminator97> How could u say something like that? Besides there are more "mixed" people considered black by people like you, and "free" blacks with "guns" in this country. On top of that our president is biracial! Stop living in a fantasy world. Be for real dude....
Ralowski 2 years ago
i don't think america won't last than year 2060.. we might start a war with Iran & koreans with nuclear weapon wipe america away.. = o
NoahGotti 2 years ago
i agree with this video
MrLOLSUPBRO 2 years ago
Your stats are deceptive. Only 5% of whites owned slaves near the end of slavery. Over half of the white population of AmeriKKKa owned slaves from 1640 to 1740 and nearly all of the white population took advantage of cheap black labor as a right of white AmeriKKKan heritage.
Whites would not let go of the privilege of Jim Crow Laws until 1965. Do you think blacks are stupid enough to accept your revision of history?
If you truly want t get along, try dealing with the truth.
Do you want peace?
HarTziyon 2 years ago
Go look up the 1860 census. In it you will see that at the very height of slavery, the percentage of whites who owned slaves was 1.5. That's right, 98.5% of whites did not own slaves. It is the epitome of racism to imply that those people were just sitting around living off slave labor.
No free handouts today! Go get a job! Earn your way through life rather than demanding reparations just because you happen to be the same color as the slaves. You are not a slave and I will not be yours!
OppositeName 2 years ago 5
@HarTziyon You can waste your whole life for crying and blaming. good luck with that. People like you are more racist towards others than anyone alse. so get through your own complexes.
nataha13 1 year ago
@HarTziyon Anti-White only the Super Rich could afford slaves, and that was less than 1%. So even 5% was a grest overstatement. Meanwile as much as 30% White folks in europe were Serfs(slave-spanish/serf-english,same word different language) belonging to the State. About the same for Blacks in Africa. Whites DID NOT enslave Blacks, Blacks did. They say they are Anti-Racist, what they are is Anti-White. Anti-Racist is a CODEWORD for Anti-White.
Stradivari1715 6 months ago
@HarTziyon where the fuck did you get your info????
4evaFranyFran 5 months ago
@HarTziyon i just read a number of percents, i think your math is too high, but this video obviously was making up a false and low number...
i think blacks are stupid enough to not understand math, but percentages they can handle i hope...
we already have a race war, long term - read my channel, we have never had peace...
one in every four households owned slaves in the South, based on the 1860 census
glorp896 3 months ago
@HarTziyon or should i believe this?:
The notion that the average Confederate waged war to preserve slavery is a tenuous one at best. Only 6 percent of Southerners owned slaves, and 3 percent of those owned the majority. Recruits themselves referred to the war as "a rich man's war and a poor man's fight."
glorp896 3 months ago
@HarTziyon it would be pretty hard to believe over half the agrarian south could afford slaves, i'm sure most of them were farming mostly just for themselves, some subsistence farming and a bit more... it obviously was big land owners that owned the bulk of the slaves... but of course i'm sure it was nothing like today as we watched our small farms get crushed for decades until it no longer became a media issue... where did u get your data? i book marked some of my references if u want them
glorp896 3 months ago
What if Everyone was Blonde? What if Everyone had Green Eyes? What if Everyone had Red Hair..
There would still be Diversity. Look at China. Most have the same physical features but no 2 people are alike.
Stop with the White Oppression crap. Go find yourself a nice Brazilian woman and chill out.
IHS7 2 years ago 3
If the Child is nearly always "Black" what then defines what "Black" is?
That conclusion totally discredits your other video on "Does Race Exist".
IHS7 2 years ago
"If the Child is nearly always 'Black' what then defines what 'Black' is?"
If you watched this and paid attention, you'd notice I explain this: White genes are not dominant. They tend to get washed out. The child really does show up genetically as black (not just visually).
So much for your assertion that this discredits the concept of race.
OppositeName 2 years ago
Comment removed
Aayudh009 2 years ago
"In white and black coupless the child is nearly always black?"
Thats incorrect!! The child is just as much white as it is black even though the child may APPEAR to be "black." And a biracial child who looks more "black" does not make it any less white. The child is both races. The child would not exist without both races.
LaMasChevere22 2 years ago
@LaMasChevere22
1 drop nigger is too much nigger.
TheTerminator97 2 years ago
@LaMasChevere22 genetically speaking yes, the child would be just "as white as he is black". But that what appears, is what most people define as race. DUH
s1kb45trd 8 months ago
And white women love black men.
PeppyFrisco 2 years ago
"And white women love black men."
Actually, judging by the historical and psychological evidence, white women generally have to be deceived and guilt-tripped into wanting black men, which is why the occurrence of the phenomenon has increased with the rise of multicultural misinformation and anti-white racism.
OppositeName 2 years ago
i'd like to see that data. Not to contest you but, it is rather intruiging.
partilov1 2 years ago
@OppositeName Bravo!
Stradivari1715 6 months ago
@OppositeName hOLY FUCK, ARE YOU ON CRACK? Heres a simpler explanation: blondes like 14 inch black cock. Simple as that. No mental gymnastics or psycho-babble required.
chefshitpiece 6 months ago
@chefshitpiece Black men don't have 14 inchcocks, unless they are using the smaller endowed black men in porn. But personally I know black men with smaller dicks then me. I'm a blonde male, but I'm NOT dumb. There is a T-shirt out that says "Niggers love blondes", I'm assuming black males loving blonde females(?) I've had black females tell me I'm large. From what I can tell 7.5" does the job. I don't envy your 14" inch cock, esp. if its really thin.
Rosktron 6 months ago
white people are suffering because of their own success, womens rights are a main part of this.Instead of having a family, women are not getting married and not having children because they are involved in their careers. We dont have 10 kids because we know its not economically viable to do it, where as poorer nations seem to not know when to stop.
trigga1uk 3 years ago
That was actually a good video with some nice points. This is probably one of the only vids about this subject that dont put races into a racial hierachy. Good job.
Nawledge1 3 years ago
Your videos are awesome! Thank you for bringing light to this subject.
bbpro 3 years ago
Nice info about slavery. Many African Americans think that every single white person was gung-ho about slavery. The truth is the majority of Americans during those days abhored the thought of slavery for obvious moral reasons.
And about the Causcasian population, keep in mind that even though the percentage will drop to the single digits, the overall population increases. There are still more white people today than there have ever been throughout history.
Aridaemus 3 years ago
Great point about the absolute number of Caucasians! You are correct that it is only the percentage that is declining.
bbpro 3 years ago
Great video OppositeName. Judging by the video, it looks like you are a White Nationalist.
BUT... "All we have to do is choose to let NO race become too rare." How are we going to do that without breaking the few guidelines you mentioned just before that? Impossible.
RenewableFuel 3 years ago
I don't consider myself a White Nationalist the way most people think of it. Actually, the definition is a bit hazy. Liberals define WN's as psychotic racists Nazis (how fair they are), and on the other end of the spectrum there seem to be people interested in separatism. I'm not sure that's necessary in any formal sense. All I want is for the racism against White people to stop. Our society has worked very hard at eliminating prejudice against other groups. Now we've gone far past fairness.
OppositeName 3 years ago
Regarding the prevention of any race becoming too rare, we COULD do it if we required white couples to have enough children that the number of white children equals the number of white parents each generation. Mixed couples can still have kids, but we maintain the numbers of pure-race children for each major race. I just think it's sad that some people would happily let one beautiful variety of humanity disappear off the Earth. Maybe it's because so many hate us for being white. (Racism.)
OppositeName 3 years ago
What about the poor Mestizos in Mexico and Central America? Millions of them were raped by the White Spaniards and the African Slaves they imported. Did the White man hate them for being "red". (Racism.)?
Who should they marry since the majority of Mexicans are not pure bred Native Americans?
What about Indians, West Asians (Lebanon, Syria, Afghanistan), and North Africans? Their not a pure race either, who should they fuck with? Eastern Europeans carry mongol ancestry and yes it is visible.
justme85 3 years ago
Not an easy situation, is it. Between you and me, I don't really care who they have sex with as long as they aren't spreading diseases; I DO care who they procreate with. I happen to value the blonde, blue-eyed look, and it's just beginning to be destroyed. I think we should try to prevent that. Of course, getting people to cooperate is another matter entirely, but the idea is at least possible.
OppositeName 3 years ago
I don't think Eugenics was a good idea. Which is what you sound like you are trying to suggest.
RenewableFuel 3 years ago
Our society employs eugenics all the time. They just don't like the word for it. For instance, people with Down Syndrome are prevented from breeding because any offspring they had would also have their syndrome. We do this with countless other ailments as well. Are we really going to let an entire race of our species go extinct because we are scared of a word?
OppositeName 3 years ago
Interesting. But how can we preserve a certain group of people without be racist (discriminatory). I see the situation you are talking about and I'm over the "Who is superior" argument. But how can we be equal and fair and secure an existence for European derived people?
RenewableFuel 3 years ago
My thought on this is simply that we keep track of how many white children are born from one generation to the next. If the number drops, we give a financial incentive to white parents to have more children. We should be willing to do this for any race whose numbers are declining (hence it is not discriminatory, even if it's less likely to be needed for races whose genes are more dominant than ours). It's thus possible in theory to prevent a race from going extinct without banning miscegenation.
OppositeName 3 years ago
AMEN
JEBO777 3 years ago