@DYLANDISASTERbz Actually, no not really. If you could see a neutron star with your eyes, you would see a perfect whiteish violet sphere(in the same moment you would also die of lethal gamma & x-ray radiation), because of the extreme gravity the biggest mountains are only a few millimeters tall and you couldn't see any structure on its surface
The chance that you will win the lottery is "comfortably small"; the chance that you will be struck by lightning is comfortably small. However, there has not been a gamma ray explosion in this sector of the Galaxy for some time. One is long overdue.
The Creator of the Universe has posted a video on YouTube, explaining how probability or chance affects humankind.
thats amazing, the death of sun roughly 100 times the size of the earth, circumference of about 2.8 million miles crunched down into a couple miles (19miles-??). a pinch of a neutron star would crush your house like a shaved toothpick
a few miles across ???? naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. then how does it annihilate everything with its gamma rays even if its 300 light light years away,, , that old man is stupid
Proposition 17: If the 'centre of the universe' is necessarily a Black Hole or The One Central Neutron Star, then it follows that human beings can never and shall never have any true idea of it or its workings because that would require the planet and all of us 'entering into it' with inevitable results. Am I confused?
@SmileyGarrish In a sense you are, but it is confusing, and counter-intuitive much of them time, but, my best mate and Director of Graduate Astrophysics at my U will tell you there isn't a "center of the Universe. Galaxies, yes, Universe, no. In any event, I argue these things with him, even though he has encyclopaedic knowledge of these things, he knows what is currently held to be true, I still challenge him . As a matter of fact, I want to argue Guth's "Super Expansion" with him tomorrow
@painxtreme It seems to me our perception of energy/mass exchange within the nucleus of an atom is not dissimilar to our much larger perception of the physical movements of the solar system. And beyond. Humans now see rotating spherical Galaxies and such maintaining fundamental laws of rotation and gravitation. But on enormous scale. It follows that somewhere among absolutely all of the 'Rotating Galaxies', and all else in the Universe, resides a central point at which all else rotates. No?
@SmileyGarrish Sad to say, the whole Universe doesn't rotate is current science. Heck, it could all be much much weirder than anyone can imagine, or discover Laws for. The best I can tell you is the current science, and the reason that scientists insist on dark matter is because under known laws, a galaxy should rotate once, maybe, then fly apart. Spiral Galaxies can't exist without being held together by something, since the outer bands rotate at the same sped as the center, and its not gravity
@painxtreme That is awfully close to saying and believing that the proverbial 'Laws of Science' somehow stop operating or having validity beyond our own tiny neighbourhood (solar system). Granted what we call gravity is only one aspect of an objective reality including masses and speeds we may not yet comprehend but it seems to me that matter's attraction to itself is a function of a much larger scheme of things; and that Galaxies do indeed follow concrete Laws, of which we are as yet ignorant.
@SmileyGarrish Not at all, Galaxies certainly do not behave like planetary star systems. By E=MC squared, there is no exceeding the speed of light, to answer that. Until you get on a planet sized scale, gravity is very weak. It is the weakest of the 4 forces. Want proof? lay a paper clip on your desk, hold a magnet over it, Voila, one of the 4 forces defeats gravity. Galaxies indeed do not follow concrete laws in anyway. In fact the only explanation for their action is the unknown dark matter.
@painxtreme In due respect, may I ask how long you've studied Astrophysics? I ask cuz at the end of your first post you asked if you were confused, so I laid out a really basic picture of things, and you argued with me. My friend has been Director of Graduate (not undergrad) Astrophysics at our college for over 12 years, and I think his understanding is a bit more than yours. Im an Emeritus Prof of Art History, but Ive studied Astrophysics for over 30 yrs. Only trying to offer Info, not insult
@painxtreme I was under the false (?) impression that Dark Matter was in opposition to Light Matter, as in that which we can see or could be seen by us; and that Dark Matter somehow 'balanced' out the Light. Here is a $1,000,000 idea for you: write a book called "What We Do Not Know" which would explain the rather Black Hole like gaps in human knowledge and understanding. Science implies and propagates a primary certainty which it obviously does not have - like working with the imagined Zero.
@SmileyGarrish Well, it goes this way. Our Universe is 4% matter, 75% Dark Energy, and 20% dark matter. Its not dark in either case, its just invisible, and dark matter flies right thru us without interacting, just like neutrinos, about 600 billion of them pass thru each square centimeter in your body every second. The Dark Matter and Energy are only placeholder words for things they do not understand. But I have to tell you, any real scientist will tell you, there is nothing 100% certain
@painxtreme I am arguing from utter ignorance. So thanks for being polite about it. But you have uncovered my pet theory: That the 'Dark Matter' passing through ourselves and all other life is the true underlying cause of 'aging' and cancer. From what genetics and science I have studied it seems to me that our genetic 'modelling' or rebuilding mechanisms (recombination processes) are susceptible or liable to be damaged at an deeply atomic level by such tiny bits of 'pollution' - hence no cure.
@painxtreme I am no scientist but I do know one thing is most certain - the Death of my body. And of that I am !00% certain. Beyond that nothing is certain any more. Okay, maybe that life as we know it shall inevitably be wiped out by the arrival of another larger meteor than those which have already impacted the orb. But that is pessimistic, and I am an optimist. But I do keep one eye open at all times...looking skyward just in case.....
@SmileyGarrish I doubt Dark Matter or Neutrinos, (some scientists think they're one and the same) would cause things like cancer, because the reason they elude us is, they don't react. Cosmic Rays are even more abundant, but they peter out as they go thru the Earth, so...In mines, from 2, to 6 miles deep, scientists have large tanks....of all things, cleaning fluid. They go this deep to rule out cosmic rays, but in the one in a trillion happening, a neutrino interacts, and creates an argon atom.
@painxtreme Trick is...finding the one atom. They had success with this, and are now more advanced, but particle physicists are crazy that everything they want to study is flying all around them. It just doesnt react with anything. That's part of what they hope to find with collisions at Cern That's the semi-long way around your question. Ive tried to stay general, I avoided breaking it out into General Relativity (Huge Stuff) and Quantum (tiny fast stuff).
A spiritual definition to Neutron Giant Death Star filtering all other neutron systemed smaller stars, defines Giant ABBA Godd the light of this world...ps
Neutron star ~ 20 km wide. Earth 12756 km wide. Sun = 1,325,000 km wide. It would be crazy to observe from space this tiny little dot the mass of the sun come near earth, and have the gravity rip the crust and the lava from the earth and steamroller it flat on the dot's surface.
@mummyfish1012 no it's not bs neutron stars have a gravitational pull that's just mind blowing I watched a documentery the other night called wonders of the universe (I highly recomend) and it sed that if you wer standing on a normal office chair on the surface of a neutron star and u jump off in the time of traveling that 2ft you would reach a speed of 4000000miles an hour!!!!!
@TheFerruccio: Well, that's sorta tough. Just as the sun radiation peaks in the yellow part of visible light, a neutron star peaks in the xray-to-gamma ray area. Since that is far from what human eyes can sense, what would be visible is somewhat speculative. Most likely no one would be able to get close enough to eyeball it before being fried by the high-energy radiation. Three minutes of narration in absolute darkness probably is not in the cards.
@puncheex That is true that most of it would be out of the spectrum. Though, surely we could see something. There might be some kind of component of light that the neutron star emits that would be visible. From what I can gather, the light that is emitted in the spectrum would generally appear as white. I think the main problem is it would look relatively mundane in reality. You'd probably see a white sphere and some gravitational lensing affects for the background stars.
@TheFerruccio: The white light that we are accustomed to peaks in the yellow-green and falls off on either side. This white would be even across the spectrum and quite dim, but perhaps slightly more blue than normal. The gravity lensing effect, interestingly enough, would allow you to see maybe 80% of the surface area of the star when you look at it, and yes, it would distort light coming from objects behind rather violently. Of course, you'd die from radiation before it got into view, probably.
@puncheex Yepyep, all of this is true! Perhaps white or blue, overall pretty uninteresting from the visual perspective. Since it would be pretty smooth, likely uniformly emitting intense energy in all directions (assuming quiescence), then it would be hard to notice how both of its "poles" would be facing you if you're looking at it from the side. I love explaining neutron stars to people, they're intense!
@TheFerruccio If you like teaching people about Neutron Stars, how about you educate yourself first. Simply, a star doesn't turn visibly red because its moving away. Its spectral signature shifts to the red, and wouldn't reflect that on a mirror. Spectrophotometry is all about stretching or compressing wavelengths. Is Betelgeuse red because its red shifted? NO, its a Red Giant. Would it turn blue if coming our way? No, not Visually, but in spectral photography, yes,
@TheFerruccio I don't think it was you I had intended, I apologize. I would say, shift speaking, things like red and blue shift aren't reflections, its a lightwave doppler effect, observed with spectrographic cameras, so there's no shine, just a spectrum line. Doesn't even resemble a star. Im not trying to talk down, I don't know how much you know about various aspects of Astronomy, such as x-ray telescopes, Infrared scopes, etc. Most people only see refractors, and Im sure youre more aware.
@painxtreme Very true! It is also true that heavy asymmetries in spacetime can lead to emitters being redshifted. However, the symmetry of the "to and from"-ness of the ambient light might negate any gravitational effects (say, photons gaining much energy, being blueshifted, as they enter the gravitational field, then being redshifted back to their "free space" energy after they bounce off.). However, I do not know the intricacies of light reflection off degenerate matter (might be trivial).
@puncheex If the neutron star got pretty dim in the visible spectrum, and it was orbiting a much larger, intense star, and the lighting conditions were just right, I'd imagine that it would be quite shiny and smooth (since there's only a ~4mm variance in crust height, as theorized), reflecting the light from nearby stars and the sun. (Though, would it be a redshifted reflection?)
@TheFerruccio: I agree; it would probably look like a chrome ball bearing in space. Red shifted? Excellent question; if it reflected at all, I imagine it wouldn't be shifted because the light would have to traverse the gravity well in both directions, but it's an interesting thought.
@puncheex Red or Blue shift have nothing to do reflectivity, object color, albedo or magnitude at all. If it is racing away, it is shifted toward the red spectrum of light, if it's coming towards us, it is blue shifted on the spectrum. Do you know nothing about Stellar Spectral analysis? They dont take photos of planets, and say, "Oh my isn't that a shiny one!" Maybe shiny means sideways. Learn about stellar spectral photography, If it emits enough light to detect, it has a spectrum to detect
Respond to this video... So red shifted?, who knows. Shift being different due to being Chrome-like appearance? Stop and really, really think about that, or Get an Astronomy 101, or in our case 801, I believe, and learn this stuff before filling casual viewer's heads with worse pseudo-science than Di-lithium Crystal Warp Drive. Fan of Immanuel Velikovsky, are we?
The true aim of science should be to learn, even by failure, not to apply science fiction to science cuz it sounds right to you.
@painxtreme: Perhaps, inside all this compound fantasy and verbal diahrea, you also know that a trip down a gravity well also causes red shift? Perhaps, instead of trying to chew me a new one you stop and answer the question better than I did? If you really think you can, of course. If I'm shown wrong, or even why I might be wrong, then I'll "carve "Imagine that" on the side of my cock."
What the hell does Velikovsky have to do with this?
look at what we have achieved in recent 500 years, in about a million years I'm pretty sure that if we stay alive as a race these bursts won't be a problem : )
peed in ur pants. lol what a wussy. when i was watching this during a storm at night where im at. when the thunder hit, at-least i only tinkled a little. maybe a drop or two..... ;)
@MummyFish1012 A piece of Neutron Star the size of a sugar cube (1cm^3) would weigh roughly 100 million tons, so it's not improbable when you have a solid ball of that 12 miles wide.
The N. stars gravity compresses and packs matter down tight, with neutrons, protons and electrons side by side. Atoms are mostly empty space. On a neutron star the intense gravity removes most of that space. A blackhole removes even more of that space, compressing further down to quark against quark or even further than that to string against string or to unknown building blocks of quarks. That's why a black hole is even smaller than a N. star.
@john17972: What you describe is called degenerate matter; it is known to form a thin crust on neutron stars, as well as making up some white dwarfs. But at neutron star density, the electrons are absorbed by the protons, rendering them neutrons, and the neutrons are packed so close together that, in effect, the core of the star is one humongous neutron. This is the last gasp for matter in its fight to hold off gravity. One more little squeeze, and the neutron star becomes a black hole.
my god im not even smart in math and im obsessed with sciece and can remember stuf like as each second ticks away on a clock, 700 Million Tons of Hydrogen is converted into 695 Tons of Helium on the Sun.
@robinsgirlwonder Same here...i suck at math and i can hardly remember stuff happening in the morning but i can...uh...well...i play guitar you know? xD All of this science stuff is great but it wouldn't be so bad if it didn't come with the knowledge that maybe when i finish writing this sentence the earth might just explode...JUST because...
This is a very bad simulation of what a neutron star should look like. I'm no acomplished astronomer but they are white. They turn around really quickly. And they're VIOLENT. This just looks like a calm water planet thingy. Just horrid.
These things are so strange! Theye could stand on holland yet they could kill anything that comes a 1000 lightyears near it. It's so compact! One grain of salt of this matter would weigh 400 billion kg. How can you imagine such a thing? If one little piece would drop here it would just... I don't know!
@Glennfalconi ye I was kind of exaggerating :P... but, gravity isn't determined by volume. I tried to work out how much volume from a neutron star you'd need to match Suns gravity but, not enough time :/ I shall try another time.
@Glennfalconi: A neutron star has no more power than a regular star of the same mass, as long as you were outside, not inside the latter. A problem only exists because the neutron star (or black hole, for that matter) is so much smaller that it is possible to be much closer to them than you could be to a star of that mass. So, no, they can't "kill anything that comes a 1000 lightyears", they warp things unusually (with tidal forces) things that come closer than, oh, 6 light-seconds or so.
it is clearly seen,tht this documentary is just made to atract general public so visualisation is realy more fancy than real..(its nice and i like it,but the people including myself who are realy interested in things like astronomy and astrophysix should be able to see this and take it with reserve..u know what i mean.. fuck..i could go on and on..its just not enough room here.:D.sorry for my english.i am still working on it..greetings from Slovakia...
Something spinning 700 times a second will give the illusion of a smooth surface. To see something spinn it actually have to spinn verry slow. I get more annoyed of the illustration of neutron stars that spinn like 5-10 times a second. THAT is unreal.....
@weirdscience81 True, but neutron stars do have a smooth surface area. This is because the gravity pulls all the matter of the star into a perfect sphere.
@weirdscience81 The Crab Nebula pulsar spins 30 times a second, so its not far off what you think is unreal, infact, over the brief period we have been observing them, they all them seem to be gradually slowing down, their energy is dissipating with age.
@yugface Thank you Sir, Allah the creatures of the universe had been informed also ; "It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. He detaileth the revelations for people who have knowledge.."(QS.10:5) Did you had been knowledge Sir? Or you're Nothing...??!!
@yugface Thank you Sir, Allah the creatures of the universe had been informed also; "It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. He detaileth the revelations for people who have knowledge.."(QS.10:5) Did you have been knowledge Sir? Or you are nothing...!
Allah the creatures of the universe had been informed also to the people by "SMS" since +/- 1,400 years a go, when Mr.Hubble, Copernicus, Galileo etc. were not born yet ; "It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. He detaileth the revelations for people who have knowledge.."(QS.10:5)
Allah the creatures of the universe had been informed to the people by SMS since +/- 1,400 years a go, when Mr.Hubble, Copernicus, Galileo etc. were not born yet "It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. (Thus) doth He explain His Signs in detail, for those who understand."(QS.10:5)
@Joelskie20 Sorry,I just open w/ my mind and my soul only, I just believe only statement from the creator of the universe and the creator of the humans including yourself. Allah also had been informed that the day of resurrection when the STAR is DEATH; "He questions: “When is the Day of Resurrection?” So when the sight becomes dazed, And the MOON is buried in DARKNESS. And the SUN and MOON are JOINED TOGETHER,-" (QS:75 verse 6-9) Did you have been knowldege Sir? or your mind & soul are blinds
Believed or not; Allah SWT the creator of the universe had been informed that the day after tomorrow when the star is death as below:
"He questions: “When is the Day of Resurrection?” So when the sight becomes dazed, And the moon is buried in darkness. And the sun and moon are joined together,-" (Quran Surah Al Qiyamat (75) verse 6 to 9)
@cr4yv3n are you believed in GOD? GOD had been created the universe including yourself. He knows everything and just to informing us about the process of resrrection since +/- 1.400 years a go, "He (mean: you) questions: “When is the Day of Resurrection?” So when the sight becomes dazed, And the moon is buried in darkness. And the sun and moon are joined together,-" (Quran Surah Al Qiyamat (75) verse 6 to 9) He explained about the theory of "The Death Star Effect" to human being, are you human?
@cr4yv3n Allah SWT also explaining about how the process of creating the universe or we called "the Big Bang Theory" since +/- 1.400 years a go..., "Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were of one piece, then We parted them, and we made every living thing of water? Will they not then believe?"(Quran Surah Al Anbiyya' (21) verse 30)
@cr4yv3n No Sir, you're wrong..., Allah SWT said to all people including you that; "But it is clear revelations in the hearts of those who have been given knowledge, and none deny Our revelations save wrong-doers."(Quran Surah Al 'Ankabut (29) verse 49), Do you have been knowledge, Sir? Where are you coming from, Sir? and where are you going to after you die, Sir? Please answer quickly with your smart brain....or you are nothing....
@cr4yv3n Allah said that: "Blessed be Allah in Whose hands is Dominion; and He is Able to do all things, Who created DEATH and LIFE that He may try you which of you is best in deeds; and He is the Mighty, the Forgiving, Who created the seven skies one above another; you see no incongruity in the creation of the Beneficent Allah; then look again, can you see any disorder? Then turn back the eye again and again; your look shall come back to you confused while it is fatigued."(QS.67:1-4)
@handimarta alah said, alah did. what does your LOGIC says to you? If you were born in an african tribe and believed in the mountain Juju god then your god would be Juju.
Think, you can think for yourself. You CAN see the truth for yourself. Don't continue quoting a dumb book just coz others tell you too. That's why you are human to be able to THINK for yourself.
@cr4yv3n We are nothing (still death) in 50 years ago, and now we are life in the earth untill max. 70 years later, and after that we will be death again...Please answer with your the best logic, does Allah (God) will give us the second life in the next future? the answer is should be absolutly YES! when and where we are life in the future? only Allah (God) knows that, maybe going to the hell (life in the Sun) or in His Paradise....Please think carefully with your best logic!
@cr4yv3n No, I'm not afraid of death, coz we're already death (nothing) before and we are life now and then we will be death (nothing) again and so on. I believed you are very smartman, please answer my question, Who are you exactly? Where are you from? and where are you going to? and Why were you born and life now? Only Allah (God) had the answers, coz He the creatures of the universe, & living creatures including you, you can just read His book. and what you see & what you get that's all..
You are here because you were born. You are who you are, you are defined by relationships with your fellow humans and marks you leave wether good or bad.
Why are you here? This question could be posed by a hamster who's brain evolves.
SO yeah we are some hamsters whose brains have evolved. The "purpose" you so desperately seek is your choosing. No god or allah or w/e bullshit can tell you what you are. It's YOUR choice.
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't a black hole just a neutron star that compressed down so far its gravity will not let light escape? Isn't the material still there just like a neutron star but with greater gravity?
theoretically the answer is yes it would be composed of everything that enters its gravitational field, but we wont have anyway of knowing for sure unless we can safely study a black hole and its structure.
@myriadcorp: Sorry to be replying so late. The answer is no. A black hole is a mass which has lost its fight to stand against gravity and has collapsed *completely*, right down to a geometric point; it is a totally different state of matter at infinite density. A maximal sized neutron star has a surface acceleration of about .6 light speed, so if you got close enough to see it you can actually see some 80% of it's surface. Light is bent greatly, but not 100% completely.
Why is it when you always watch these kinds of programs on like the History channel they're like "but could these devastating things happen to Earth? They can! The effects would be catastrophic."
what happen if u drop neutro star on neutron star?
chriswww 1 week ago
@chriswww black hole
epreistooawesome 6 hours ago
the death star is not even bright. its just a gray space station
Walkerandstuff 3 weeks ago
Actually quite scary..
AlbinoPenguinn 1 month ago
I'm dropping my balls on the neutron stars = tsar bomba
MrSuperZangief 1 month ago
oohh this is nice :(
lwvok 1 month ago
believe me you dont want a nuclear marshmallow ,theyre dangerous.
MrCeltic76 1 month ago 2
Atomic marshmallows?? I want one. :(
mnemoniccourier 1 month ago
I don´t like neutron stars!
derciorj21 2 months ago
Bam bam bam bam bam bam bam bam bamm bamm.. Bing bing bing?
Lazyier123 2 months ago
Black Hole FTW
LokiCocola 2 months ago 2
gamma ray biatches!
MegaRoFLL 2 months ago
Neutron Stars sure make great CGi effects lol
DYLANDISASTERbz 2 months ago
@DYLANDISASTERbz Actually, no not really. If you could see a neutron star with your eyes, you would see a perfect whiteish violet sphere(in the same moment you would also die of lethal gamma & x-ray radiation), because of the extreme gravity the biggest mountains are only a few millimeters tall and you couldn't see any structure on its surface
AVLACDN 1 month ago
@AVLACDN That's very smart, except I don't see how that retaliates against my original comment about them being nice CGi effects.
DYLANDISASTERbz 1 month ago
Damn nature! You scary!
cjgoboom8 2 months ago 3
@cjgoboom8 oh shut up and come up with your own comment oh you cant
FIGHTFANNERD3 2 months ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3 What, you mad because I said it before you. YOU MAD BRO???????
cjgoboom8 2 months ago
The chance that you will win the lottery is "comfortably small"; the chance that you will be struck by lightning is comfortably small. However, there has not been a gamma ray explosion in this sector of the Galaxy for some time. One is long overdue.
The Creator of the Universe has posted a video on YouTube, explaining how probability or chance affects humankind.
See ' God says sorry ' .
lacontrabasse 3 months ago
Seems like fun.
jwloohou2 3 months ago
black holes= trolls.
gethsoftware 4 months ago
Thats where Thor lives
sergeant07 4 months ago
thats amazing, the death of sun roughly 100 times the size of the earth, circumference of about 2.8 million miles crunched down into a couple miles (19miles-??). a pinch of a neutron star would crush your house like a shaved toothpick
a1sauses 5 months ago
a million times brighter than the sun? shiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet
menkooomigen 5 months ago 21
Amazing
CaneFan25 5 months ago
just another marble!
MrSpladow 5 months ago
Comfortably very small...right. Send in the clones!!!
ghosty426 5 months ago
I want one -__-
DeorumNuntium 5 months ago 16
everyone knows that the gamma rays are from the green lanterns frighting parralax -.-
hugec4 6 months ago
a few miles across ???? naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. then how does it annihilate everything with its gamma rays even if its 300 light light years away,, , that old man is stupid
Asleepymystikal 6 months ago
@Asleepymystikal because you know more than him right?
Maxat4 6 months ago
@Asleepymystikal gamma ray bursts can fuck anyhting within a 1000 light years, if its pointing at somthing that is
murderface0666 6 months ago
@Asleepymystikal ur an idiot dude
carsdankandchicks 5 months ago
@carsdankandchicks im an idiot?? and your just soo freaking bright arent u . u little imbecile, go s, a. d you fucking shit head.
Asleepymystikal 5 months ago
what state of matter would it be ?
kingddot 6 months ago
Neutron Star = GOD : )
c1cter 6 months ago
Proposition 17: If the 'centre of the universe' is necessarily a Black Hole or The One Central Neutron Star, then it follows that human beings can never and shall never have any true idea of it or its workings because that would require the planet and all of us 'entering into it' with inevitable results. Am I confused?
SmileyGarrish 6 months ago
@SmileyGarrish In a sense you are, but it is confusing, and counter-intuitive much of them time, but, my best mate and Director of Graduate Astrophysics at my U will tell you there isn't a "center of the Universe. Galaxies, yes, Universe, no. In any event, I argue these things with him, even though he has encyclopaedic knowledge of these things, he knows what is currently held to be true, I still challenge him . As a matter of fact, I want to argue Guth's "Super Expansion" with him tomorrow
painxtreme 6 months ago
@painxtreme It seems to me our perception of energy/mass exchange within the nucleus of an atom is not dissimilar to our much larger perception of the physical movements of the solar system. And beyond. Humans now see rotating spherical Galaxies and such maintaining fundamental laws of rotation and gravitation. But on enormous scale. It follows that somewhere among absolutely all of the 'Rotating Galaxies', and all else in the Universe, resides a central point at which all else rotates. No?
SmileyGarrish 6 months ago
@SmileyGarrish Sad to say, the whole Universe doesn't rotate is current science. Heck, it could all be much much weirder than anyone can imagine, or discover Laws for. The best I can tell you is the current science, and the reason that scientists insist on dark matter is because under known laws, a galaxy should rotate once, maybe, then fly apart. Spiral Galaxies can't exist without being held together by something, since the outer bands rotate at the same sped as the center, and its not gravity
painxtreme 6 months ago
@painxtreme That is awfully close to saying and believing that the proverbial 'Laws of Science' somehow stop operating or having validity beyond our own tiny neighbourhood (solar system). Granted what we call gravity is only one aspect of an objective reality including masses and speeds we may not yet comprehend but it seems to me that matter's attraction to itself is a function of a much larger scheme of things; and that Galaxies do indeed follow concrete Laws, of which we are as yet ignorant.
SmileyGarrish 6 months ago
@SmileyGarrish Not at all, Galaxies certainly do not behave like planetary star systems. By E=MC squared, there is no exceeding the speed of light, to answer that. Until you get on a planet sized scale, gravity is very weak. It is the weakest of the 4 forces. Want proof? lay a paper clip on your desk, hold a magnet over it, Voila, one of the 4 forces defeats gravity. Galaxies indeed do not follow concrete laws in anyway. In fact the only explanation for their action is the unknown dark matter.
painxtreme 6 months ago
@painxtreme In due respect, may I ask how long you've studied Astrophysics? I ask cuz at the end of your first post you asked if you were confused, so I laid out a really basic picture of things, and you argued with me. My friend has been Director of Graduate (not undergrad) Astrophysics at our college for over 12 years, and I think his understanding is a bit more than yours. Im an Emeritus Prof of Art History, but Ive studied Astrophysics for over 30 yrs. Only trying to offer Info, not insult
painxtreme 6 months ago
@painxtreme I was under the false (?) impression that Dark Matter was in opposition to Light Matter, as in that which we can see or could be seen by us; and that Dark Matter somehow 'balanced' out the Light. Here is a $1,000,000 idea for you: write a book called "What We Do Not Know" which would explain the rather Black Hole like gaps in human knowledge and understanding. Science implies and propagates a primary certainty which it obviously does not have - like working with the imagined Zero.
SmileyGarrish 6 months ago
@SmileyGarrish Well, it goes this way. Our Universe is 4% matter, 75% Dark Energy, and 20% dark matter. Its not dark in either case, its just invisible, and dark matter flies right thru us without interacting, just like neutrinos, about 600 billion of them pass thru each square centimeter in your body every second. The Dark Matter and Energy are only placeholder words for things they do not understand. But I have to tell you, any real scientist will tell you, there is nothing 100% certain
painxtreme 6 months ago
@painxtreme I am arguing from utter ignorance. So thanks for being polite about it. But you have uncovered my pet theory: That the 'Dark Matter' passing through ourselves and all other life is the true underlying cause of 'aging' and cancer. From what genetics and science I have studied it seems to me that our genetic 'modelling' or rebuilding mechanisms (recombination processes) are susceptible or liable to be damaged at an deeply atomic level by such tiny bits of 'pollution' - hence no cure.
SmileyGarrish 6 months ago
@painxtreme I am no scientist but I do know one thing is most certain - the Death of my body. And of that I am !00% certain. Beyond that nothing is certain any more. Okay, maybe that life as we know it shall inevitably be wiped out by the arrival of another larger meteor than those which have already impacted the orb. But that is pessimistic, and I am an optimist. But I do keep one eye open at all times...looking skyward just in case.....
SmileyGarrish 6 months ago
@SmileyGarrish I doubt Dark Matter or Neutrinos, (some scientists think they're one and the same) would cause things like cancer, because the reason they elude us is, they don't react. Cosmic Rays are even more abundant, but they peter out as they go thru the Earth, so...In mines, from 2, to 6 miles deep, scientists have large tanks....of all things, cleaning fluid. They go this deep to rule out cosmic rays, but in the one in a trillion happening, a neutrino interacts, and creates an argon atom.
painxtreme 6 months ago
@painxtreme Trick is...finding the one atom. They had success with this, and are now more advanced, but particle physicists are crazy that everything they want to study is flying all around them. It just doesnt react with anything. That's part of what they hope to find with collisions at Cern That's the semi-long way around your question. Ive tried to stay general, I avoided breaking it out into General Relativity (Huge Stuff) and Quantum (tiny fast stuff).
Two Theories to unite them, haha
painxtreme 6 months ago
must be made up of tiger blood
MrJeansy95 7 months ago
DEATH STAR... ZING!
razerburst 7 months ago
The force is with this star
yezidi11 7 months ago
A spiritual definition to Neutron Giant Death Star filtering all other neutron systemed smaller stars, defines Giant ABBA Godd the light of this world...ps
pppriscy 7 months ago
love the epic music horizon episodes always have
Riiiiiich555 8 months ago
@Riiiiiich555
Say, you don't by accident know the composer and the pieces' names?
Because this Music is awesome, and I'd like to find and buy it.
WarChicken78 7 months ago in playlist Death Star
@WarChicken78 not sure about specific composers or track names
if you like this kind fo music, you may want to check out 'Immediate music' they make music very smiliar to this.
Also, the music on this clip sould alot like an orchestral version of the theme from the game clive barker's undying
I think you can find the theme on youtube I think you'll like it, its mainly choir based tis very creepy lol
hope this helps a bit, sorry i dont know more
Riiiiiich555 7 months ago
@Riiiiiich555
Thank you. I'll check it out.
WarChicken78 7 months ago
@WarChicken78
I've found the answer in the earlier comments. It's indeed from the OST of "Conan the Destroyer". It's Track 2 - Crystal Palace.
WarChicken78 7 months ago
Those are some old computers at NASA : \
Needs2Know 8 months ago
we die, so what?
perjanan 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
neuton star on earth= 2012
cssispwningu 8 months ago
Haha, this documentry use's Predators soundtrack in one segment, and the music in this one is from Conan The Destroyer - haha
DanameaTheBattleLock 8 months ago
dont mess with a neutron star
rocketrobotzrobotz11 8 months ago
2:45 shoot!
rocketrobotzrobotz11 8 months ago
remember that time when chuck norris saved the earth by round house kicking a neutron out of our orbit
Ltaxe1 8 months ago
i'm scared..
LukeCampion 9 months ago
If neutron stars are so dense, why are they not black holes.
DoctorFrogger 9 months ago
@DoctorFrogger Not quite dense enough I believe. They are formed in the same way as black holes. (from supernovae collapsing)
TubeTest42 9 months ago
@DoctorFrogger They were too small. The star didn't have enough mass to cause the core to collapse.
bokuzenkosugi 9 months ago
@DoctorFrogger: They are the last stop in the density spectrum. The next step is black hole.
puncheex 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Black hole > neutron star.
Evi1M4chine 10 months ago
Chuck Norris's balls are made of neutron star material
PrimericanIdol 10 months ago
Neutron star ~ 20 km wide. Earth 12756 km wide. Sun = 1,325,000 km wide. It would be crazy to observe from space this tiny little dot the mass of the sun come near earth, and have the gravity rip the crust and the lava from the earth and steamroller it flat on the dot's surface.
TimpBizkit 10 months ago 2
Chuck Norris can do a one arm press up on the surface of that star....
TimpBizkit 10 months ago 3
@mummyfish1012 no it's not bs neutron stars have a gravitational pull that's just mind blowing I watched a documentery the other night called wonders of the universe (I highly recomend) and it sed that if you wer standing on a normal office chair on the surface of a neutron star and u jump off in the time of traveling that 2ft you would reach a speed of 4000000miles an hour!!!!!
TheDrunkenTrooper 10 months ago
@TheDrunkenTrooper a teaspoonful of Neutron Star roughly weighs the same as Mt Everest.
painxtreme 6 months ago
hit again?
cherub0nyx 10 months ago
if chuck norris collided with a neutron star, the universe would end.
tomcarpenterr 10 months ago
I just wish they would render these correctly.
TheFerruccio 10 months ago
@TheFerruccio I just wish people would stop posting Chuck Norris comments.
RectalSpoonNinja 10 months ago
@RectalSpoonNinja
..............Chuck Norris.
jimmywrangles 10 months ago
@TheFerruccio: Well, that's sorta tough. Just as the sun radiation peaks in the yellow part of visible light, a neutron star peaks in the xray-to-gamma ray area. Since that is far from what human eyes can sense, what would be visible is somewhat speculative. Most likely no one would be able to get close enough to eyeball it before being fried by the high-energy radiation. Three minutes of narration in absolute darkness probably is not in the cards.
puncheex 6 months ago
@puncheex That is true that most of it would be out of the spectrum. Though, surely we could see something. There might be some kind of component of light that the neutron star emits that would be visible. From what I can gather, the light that is emitted in the spectrum would generally appear as white. I think the main problem is it would look relatively mundane in reality. You'd probably see a white sphere and some gravitational lensing affects for the background stars.
TheFerruccio 6 months ago
@TheFerruccio: The white light that we are accustomed to peaks in the yellow-green and falls off on either side. This white would be even across the spectrum and quite dim, but perhaps slightly more blue than normal. The gravity lensing effect, interestingly enough, would allow you to see maybe 80% of the surface area of the star when you look at it, and yes, it would distort light coming from objects behind rather violently. Of course, you'd die from radiation before it got into view, probably.
puncheex 6 months ago
@puncheex Yepyep, all of this is true! Perhaps white or blue, overall pretty uninteresting from the visual perspective. Since it would be pretty smooth, likely uniformly emitting intense energy in all directions (assuming quiescence), then it would be hard to notice how both of its "poles" would be facing you if you're looking at it from the side. I love explaining neutron stars to people, they're intense!
TheFerruccio 6 months ago
@TheFerruccio If you like teaching people about Neutron Stars, how about you educate yourself first. Simply, a star doesn't turn visibly red because its moving away. Its spectral signature shifts to the red, and wouldn't reflect that on a mirror. Spectrophotometry is all about stretching or compressing wavelengths. Is Betelgeuse red because its red shifted? NO, its a Red Giant. Would it turn blue if coming our way? No, not Visually, but in spectral photography, yes,
painxtreme 6 months ago in playlist vidstrika22's bbc science records
@painxtreme What, exactly, is it that you are correcting me on?
TheFerruccio 6 months ago
@TheFerruccio I don't think it was you I had intended, I apologize. I would say, shift speaking, things like red and blue shift aren't reflections, its a lightwave doppler effect, observed with spectrographic cameras, so there's no shine, just a spectrum line. Doesn't even resemble a star. Im not trying to talk down, I don't know how much you know about various aspects of Astronomy, such as x-ray telescopes, Infrared scopes, etc. Most people only see refractors, and Im sure youre more aware.
painxtreme 6 months ago
@painxtreme Very true! It is also true that heavy asymmetries in spacetime can lead to emitters being redshifted. However, the symmetry of the "to and from"-ness of the ambient light might negate any gravitational effects (say, photons gaining much energy, being blueshifted, as they enter the gravitational field, then being redshifted back to their "free space" energy after they bounce off.). However, I do not know the intricacies of light reflection off degenerate matter (might be trivial).
TheFerruccio 6 months ago
@puncheex If the neutron star got pretty dim in the visible spectrum, and it was orbiting a much larger, intense star, and the lighting conditions were just right, I'd imagine that it would be quite shiny and smooth (since there's only a ~4mm variance in crust height, as theorized), reflecting the light from nearby stars and the sun. (Though, would it be a redshifted reflection?)
TheFerruccio 6 months ago
@TheFerruccio: I agree; it would probably look like a chrome ball bearing in space. Red shifted? Excellent question; if it reflected at all, I imagine it wouldn't be shifted because the light would have to traverse the gravity well in both directions, but it's an interesting thought.
puncheex 6 months ago
@puncheex Red or Blue shift have nothing to do reflectivity, object color, albedo or magnitude at all. If it is racing away, it is shifted toward the red spectrum of light, if it's coming towards us, it is blue shifted on the spectrum. Do you know nothing about Stellar Spectral analysis? They dont take photos of planets, and say, "Oh my isn't that a shiny one!" Maybe shiny means sideways. Learn about stellar spectral photography, If it emits enough light to detect, it has a spectrum to detect
painxtreme 6 months ago in playlist vidstrika22's bbc science records
Respond to this video... So red shifted?, who knows. Shift being different due to being Chrome-like appearance? Stop and really, really think about that, or Get an Astronomy 101, or in our case 801, I believe, and learn this stuff before filling casual viewer's heads with worse pseudo-science than Di-lithium Crystal Warp Drive. Fan of Immanuel Velikovsky, are we?
The true aim of science should be to learn, even by failure, not to apply science fiction to science cuz it sounds right to you.
painxtreme 6 months ago in playlist vidstrika22's bbc science records
@painxtreme: Perhaps, inside all this compound fantasy and verbal diahrea, you also know that a trip down a gravity well also causes red shift? Perhaps, instead of trying to chew me a new one you stop and answer the question better than I did? If you really think you can, of course. If I'm shown wrong, or even why I might be wrong, then I'll "carve "Imagine that" on the side of my cock."
What the hell does Velikovsky have to do with this?
puncheex 6 months ago
How come God didnt put the planets in alphebetical order? His ways are not our ways.
bornagainsaint1 11 months ago
but will it blend?
YellowSturgeon 11 months ago 4
Atomic marshmallows? i want one
87mathal 11 months ago 51
look at what we have achieved in recent 500 years, in about a million years I'm pretty sure that if we stay alive as a race these bursts won't be a problem : )
sbhk1 11 months ago
peed in ur pants. lol what a wussy. when i was watching this during a storm at night where im at. when the thunder hit, at-least i only tinkled a little. maybe a drop or two..... ;)
GoldenShaolinNutz 11 months ago
@GoldenShaolinNutz Vancouver?
yomama604 11 months ago
Neutron Star = WIN !
blacklotus808 11 months ago 37
i was looking at this and sudenly a thunder outside i almost got a heart attack and i peed my pants XD
toxfox123 1 year ago 3
fat kids flirting on you tube. sad.
MeesterCrumpet 1 year ago
Very small it's still something you piece of shit ;__;
I need a hug...
thehornypuppy 1 year ago
soo we have nothing to worry about .. right?
wear4o7o 1 year ago
that marshmellow thing is bs...isnt it?!
MummyFish1012 1 year ago
@MummyFish1012 A piece of Neutron Star the size of a sugar cube (1cm^3) would weigh roughly 100 million tons, so it's not improbable when you have a solid ball of that 12 miles wide.
AnimeFanatic5602 11 months ago
3:14 every form of destruction we can imagine? sarah palin becoming presedent??? OH GAWD D:
CHUBBLE117 1 year ago
well like the japanese we should commit suicide
ervin920 1 year ago
lol nuclear marshmellows
TheHazardousMind 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Existent Asian beautiful girls dating busizz4me.info
MoniRokse 1 year ago
The N. stars gravity compresses and packs matter down tight, with neutrons, protons and electrons side by side. Atoms are mostly empty space. On a neutron star the intense gravity removes most of that space. A blackhole removes even more of that space, compressing further down to quark against quark or even further than that to string against string or to unknown building blocks of quarks. That's why a black hole is even smaller than a N. star.
john17972 1 year ago
@john17972: What you describe is called degenerate matter; it is known to form a thin crust on neutron stars, as well as making up some white dwarfs. But at neutron star density, the electrons are absorbed by the protons, rendering them neutrons, and the neutrons are packed so close together that, in effect, the core of the star is one humongous neutron. This is the last gasp for matter in its fight to hold off gravity. One more little squeeze, and the neutron star becomes a black hole.
puncheex 6 months ago
my god im not even smart in math and im obsessed with sciece and can remember stuf like as each second ticks away on a clock, 700 Million Tons of Hydrogen is converted into 695 Tons of Helium on the Sun.
What is wrong with me :)
robinsgirlwonder 1 year ago
@robinsgirlwonder Same here...i suck at math and i can hardly remember stuff happening in the morning but i can...uh...well...i play guitar you know? xD All of this science stuff is great but it wouldn't be so bad if it didn't come with the knowledge that maybe when i finish writing this sentence the earth might just explode...JUST because...
thehornypuppy 1 year ago
@thehornypuppy lol
robinsgirlwonder 1 year ago
@robinsgirlwonder It also makes you render economics, politics and school as a waste of time and precious life.
thehornypuppy 1 year ago
@robinsgirlwonder: Ummmm, make that 695 million tons. And, indeed, I can commiserate.
puncheex 6 months ago
flo rida
ifartnaked 1 year ago
deaky
Kincajou 1 year ago
freaky
naesnavillus 1 year ago
If something spins with 700times a second it will look like a smooth perfect surface.
funnystarchild 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here! The Big Oil companies r doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the energy revolution!
slanderousndgs 1 year ago
It just scares me
FrankSpijker 1 year ago
man i'd hate to see what would happen if two neutron stars collided xD
that would be like Wow ._o
MysticSonic007 1 year ago
dude marsh mellow atomic bombs xD
MysticSonic007 1 year ago
This is a very bad simulation of what a neutron star should look like. I'm no acomplished astronomer but they are white. They turn around really quickly. And they're VIOLENT. This just looks like a calm water planet thingy. Just horrid.
Glennfalconi 1 year ago
@Glennfalconi: Actually, they are mainly x-ray, however the mond would perceive that (probably as pain).
puncheex 6 months ago
These things are so strange! Theye could stand on holland yet they could kill anything that comes a 1000 lightyears near it. It's so compact! One grain of salt of this matter would weigh 400 billion kg. How can you imagine such a thing? If one little piece would drop here it would just... I don't know!
Glennfalconi 1 year ago
@Glennfalconi the sun would probably pull on IT instead of the other way around ^_^
Khomitsar 1 year ago
@Khomitsar No i don't think so. The sun just has more volume.
Glennfalconi 1 year ago
@Glennfalconi ye I was kind of exaggerating :P... but, gravity isn't determined by volume. I tried to work out how much volume from a neutron star you'd need to match Suns gravity but, not enough time :/ I shall try another time.
Khomitsar 1 year ago
@Glennfalconi: A neutron star has no more power than a regular star of the same mass, as long as you were outside, not inside the latter. A problem only exists because the neutron star (or black hole, for that matter) is so much smaller that it is possible to be much closer to them than you could be to a star of that mass. So, no, they can't "kill anything that comes a 1000 lightyears", they warp things unusually (with tidal forces) things that come closer than, oh, 6 light-seconds or so.
puncheex 6 months ago
it is clearly seen,tht this documentary is just made to atract general public so visualisation is realy more fancy than real..(its nice and i like it,but the people including myself who are realy interested in things like astronomy and astrophysix should be able to see this and take it with reserve..u know what i mean.. fuck..i could go on and on..its just not enough room here.:D.sorry for my english.i am still working on it..greetings from Slovakia...
6un6lord6 1 year ago
Something spinning 700 times a second will give the illusion of a smooth surface. To see something spinn it actually have to spinn verry slow. I get more annoyed of the illustration of neutron stars that spinn like 5-10 times a second. THAT is unreal.....
weirdscience81 1 year ago 2
@weirdscience81 True, but neutron stars do have a smooth surface area. This is because the gravity pulls all the matter of the star into a perfect sphere.
369Awsomedude 1 year ago
@weirdscience81 The Crab Nebula pulsar spins 30 times a second, so its not far off what you think is unreal, infact, over the brief period we have been observing them, they all them seem to be gradually slowing down, their energy is dissipating with age.
MajoranaFermion 1 year ago
neutronstars and black holes, BULLSHIT !!!!
it`s a plasma universe, big bang is for children and retards
jarlhelvete 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yugface Thank you Sir, Allah the creatures of the universe had been informed also ; "It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. He detaileth the revelations for people who have knowledge.."(QS.10:5) Did you had been knowledge Sir? Or you're Nothing...??!!
handimarta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yugface Thank you Sir, Allah the creatures of the universe had been informed also; "It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. He detaileth the revelations for people who have knowledge.."(QS.10:5) Did you have been knowledge Sir? Or you are nothing...!
handimarta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Allah the creatures of the universe had been informed also to the people by "SMS" since +/- 1,400 years a go, when Mr.Hubble, Copernicus, Galileo etc. were not born yet ; "It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. He detaileth the revelations for people who have knowledge.."(QS.10:5)
handimarta 1 year ago
Allah the creatures of the universe had been informed to the people by SMS since +/- 1,400 years a go, when Mr.Hubble, Copernicus, Galileo etc. were not born yet "It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that you might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. (Thus) doth He explain His Signs in detail, for those who understand."(QS.10:5)
handimarta 1 year ago
@handimarta ...fuck you handimarta...you dont know anything bec you choose to believe the lies of your religion..open your eyes...
Joelskie20 1 year ago
@Joelskie20 Sorry,I just open w/ my mind and my soul only, I just believe only statement from the creator of the universe and the creator of the humans including yourself. Allah also had been informed that the day of resurrection when the STAR is DEATH; "He questions: “When is the Day of Resurrection?” So when the sight becomes dazed, And the MOON is buried in DARKNESS. And the SUN and MOON are JOINED TOGETHER,-" (QS:75 verse 6-9) Did you have been knowldege Sir? or your mind & soul are blinds
handimarta 1 year ago
Believed or not; Allah SWT the creator of the universe had been informed that the day after tomorrow when the star is death as below:
"He questions: “When is the Day of Resurrection?” So when the sight becomes dazed, And the moon is buried in darkness. And the sun and moon are joined together,-" (Quran Surah Al Qiyamat (75) verse 6 to 9)
handimarta 1 year ago
@handimarta Get the hell outta here you religious lunatic !
cr4yv3n 1 year ago 3
@cr4yv3n are you believed in GOD? GOD had been created the universe including yourself. He knows everything and just to informing us about the process of resrrection since +/- 1.400 years a go, "He (mean: you) questions: “When is the Day of Resurrection?” So when the sight becomes dazed, And the moon is buried in darkness. And the sun and moon are joined together,-" (Quran Surah Al Qiyamat (75) verse 6 to 9) He explained about the theory of "The Death Star Effect" to human being, are you human?
handimarta 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n Allah SWT also explaining about how the process of creating the universe or we called "the Big Bang Theory" since +/- 1.400 years a go..., "Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were of one piece, then We parted them, and we made every living thing of water? Will they not then believe?"(Quran Surah Al Anbiyya' (21) verse 30)
handimarta 1 year ago
@handimarta you are poisoning the minds of people with that stinking book !
Stop quoting bullshit and get lost buddy.
Stop dreaming of heaven and shit, you die , you're done. The end.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago 2
@cr4yv3n No Sir, you're wrong..., Allah SWT said to all people including you that; "But it is clear revelations in the hearts of those who have been given knowledge, and none deny Our revelations save wrong-doers."(Quran Surah Al 'Ankabut (29) verse 49), Do you have been knowledge, Sir? Where are you coming from, Sir? and where are you going to after you die, Sir? Please answer quickly with your smart brain....or you are nothing....
handimarta 1 year ago
@handimarta You rot. Game over.
There is no after life, so enjoy the life you got now and make something out of it.
That's the only thing you get.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n Allah said that: "Blessed be Allah in Whose hands is Dominion; and He is Able to do all things, Who created DEATH and LIFE that He may try you which of you is best in deeds; and He is the Mighty, the Forgiving, Who created the seven skies one above another; you see no incongruity in the creation of the Beneficent Allah; then look again, can you see any disorder? Then turn back the eye again and again; your look shall come back to you confused while it is fatigued."(QS.67:1-4)
handimarta 1 year ago
@handimarta alah said, alah did. what does your LOGIC says to you? If you were born in an african tribe and believed in the mountain Juju god then your god would be Juju.
Think, you can think for yourself. You CAN see the truth for yourself. Don't continue quoting a dumb book just coz others tell you too. That's why you are human to be able to THINK for yourself.
Hopefully you'll see the light of reason.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n We are nothing (still death) in 50 years ago, and now we are life in the earth untill max. 70 years later, and after that we will be death again...Please answer with your the best logic, does Allah (God) will give us the second life in the next future? the answer is should be absolutly YES! when and where we are life in the future? only Allah (God) knows that, maybe going to the hell (life in the Sun) or in His Paradise....Please think carefully with your best logic!
handimarta 1 year ago
@handimarta why "yes" ?
Coz you are afraid of death ? Why believe that anyone would grant you life after you die? why? coz a book printed by us says so?
There is no "best logic" btw. Only logic.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n No, I'm not afraid of death, coz we're already death (nothing) before and we are life now and then we will be death (nothing) again and so on. I believed you are very smartman, please answer my question, Who are you exactly? Where are you from? and where are you going to? and Why were you born and life now? Only Allah (God) had the answers, coz He the creatures of the universe, & living creatures including you, you can just read His book. and what you see & what you get that's all..
handimarta 1 year ago
@handimarta Not really.
You are here because you were born. You are who you are, you are defined by relationships with your fellow humans and marks you leave wether good or bad.
Why are you here? This question could be posed by a hamster who's brain evolves.
SO yeah we are some hamsters whose brains have evolved. The "purpose" you so desperately seek is your choosing. No god or allah or w/e bullshit can tell you what you are. It's YOUR choice.
Think about it.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n Thank you Sir, your answers were not smarter then 5th years old boy, please think about that.....
handimarta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cr4yv3n Thank you Sir, your answers were not smarter then 5th years old boy, please think about that.....
handimarta 1 year ago
Comment removed
handimarta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cr4yv3n thank you sir, your answers were not smarter then 5th years old boy....:)
handimarta 1 year ago
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't a black hole just a neutron star that compressed down so far its gravity will not let light escape? Isn't the material still there just like a neutron star but with greater gravity?
myriadcorp 1 year ago
@myriadcorp
theoretically the answer is yes it would be composed of everything that enters its gravitational field, but we wont have anyway of knowing for sure unless we can safely study a black hole and its structure.
zbcanfield 1 year ago
@myriadcorp: Sorry to be replying so late. The answer is no. A black hole is a mass which has lost its fight to stand against gravity and has collapsed *completely*, right down to a geometric point; it is a totally different state of matter at infinite density. A maximal sized neutron star has a surface acceleration of about .6 light speed, so if you got close enough to see it you can actually see some 80% of it's surface. Light is bent greatly, but not 100% completely.
puncheex 6 months ago
This if from the Horizon documentari Death Star. This neutron star theory was just a theory and it was NOT the final conclusion. See the documentary.
weirdscience81 1 year ago
Why is it when you always watch these kinds of programs on like the History channel they're like "but could these devastating things happen to Earth? They can! The effects would be catastrophic."
SavageT1337 1 year ago
chuck norris landed on a neutron star and the gravity was reversed
mcchippy0 1 year ago
it's not a neutron star collison chuck norris just burped
soldierassasin 1 year ago
Which one is more dangerous, a neutron star or a black hole?
And which one is denser?
Arxtile 1 year ago
@Arxtile a black hole are more dense
savemgs 1 year ago
It's a neutron star collision~
BloodyRoxas13 1 year ago
Muse
azngreenteas 1 year ago
Neutron Star Collision (Love is Forever)- Muse
FJuarez777 1 year ago
anyone know the name of the song at the beginning?
zbcanfield 1 year ago