Alone you have to compare the times in competition of motorcycles and cars of F1 in any circuit, an alone circuit does not exist where a motorcycle (motorcycle gp, superbikes is the same) has better time that one f1, not another vehicle of the world.
Its simple logic guys a bike will always accelerate much, much faster than a car because of power to weight ratio and being less air resistant. The only reason a formula 1 car beats it around the track is because it can corner faster due to the ridiculous amounts of downforce and four tires. but then of course it wouldnt beat it by much, I am a f1 fan but sit on a stock 1000cc sports bike like a gsxr 1000 and floor it and then you can only imagine what a moto gp would do.
Motogp+average weight driver+50% fuel, 150kg+65kg+10kg=225kg. With a power output of 240bhp, you get 1.07bhp/kg.
An F1 must at all times be no less than 640 kg. Add 50 kg for 50% fuel = 690 kg. With a power of 750 bhp, you get 1.08 bhp/kg.
The difference is academic but here comes the advantage of 2 wheels over 1 wheel and downforce of F1 to get this power to the road.. For 0-100kmh, 2011 F1 about 2s, 2011 motogp about 2.5s.
@TheSventolini Actually thats not the case always. the F1 honda car is faster down a 1 mile strip then a Honda GP bike. And the 0-100 times are pretty much the same. Once the power is down the car will fly passed the bike.
@TheSventolini The accelerations are similar, but f1´s are faster. Bikes cant translate all that power into pure acceleration. They cant put the power down as well as a formula 1 car. They are slower than f1´s for some simple resons, they have 2 tyres, less downforce and much less aerodynamics. If it werent for those breaks in monza bikes would do pretty similar times to f1 cars
@TheSventolini Yes bikes mostly beat cars but things have changed the past couple of years and a moto gp will lose on a drag race. They even did it on top gear, 1 wheel and so much power will not do...
@TheSventolini Sorry to say but the bikes is much slower. Not 0-100 but after that and around a track when the F1 car laps the MotoGP has 1/4 of the track left. The MotoGP will be lapped every 4th lap...
@TheSventolini F1 gets around 25 seconds faster than a bike, even without downforce it'd be faster, as it'd increase top speed. Bikes are also getting heavier, and less top speedy. And in a start, bikes are also a tiny bit slower, due to the need of the rider kicking off. Take the example of catalunya, even with the revised f1 track to make it slower, the fastest bikes are 20 secs slower than the slowest f1 car.
I wish f1 would return to 1080 bhp, then ptw ratio would be almost on pair ;)!
Nice comments, except for the fact that they're all plain bullshit.
MotoGP can't and will never be able to accelerate as quickly as a formula 1 car for the same reason that grand prix cars are much faster in the corners than the motoGP bikes: they have much more contact with the asphalt due to a greater contact surface of rubber. Their tires will simply start spinning around like crazy. Even now the the motoGP and F1 can't use all of their power to accelerate.
Except there are bikes you can buy that have gone 0-100kph in 2.5 seconds when tested. So I think MotoGP bikes can very well accelerate faster than F1 cars. Also if a god damn Corvette can do it in less than 3 seconds (one source claimed 1.9 sec), I bet a motorcycle can do it too.
As the uploader said, F1 cars are much quicker in 100-200kph (1.2 sec according to the info) than in 0-100kph. I'm not sure about the 0-160kph in 2.5 seconds that has been claimed in these comments though.
@jeffLR91 They maybe get up to 160 in 2,5 seconds, but I would say, it's more about 3 seconds. Even though, MotoGP is faster when accelerating and it hits higher top speed on the same track as F1, it's so much slower trough corners, it's much slower on brakes, just everything relevant is worse.
@SRAMEK i know but it's quite surprising how can they be faster when their speed through corner is sometimes even 50kph below F1's cornering speed
i remember Capirossi (back in 2003 or so) hitting 345kph at the end of Montmelo's main straight while Schumacher was around 320kph. no car has ever gone over 330kph in Montmelo
and, well, Pedrosa's 355kph at Mugello is impressive to say the least
@jeffLR91 the Moto GP cuts air easily, while the F1 is made to create downforce, not to go fast on the straights. When F1 had the V10s the top speeds were much higher than now with the V8s...
@goodbued not really but the difference about the average speed is usually around 210kph for F1 and 155kph for MotoGp but that greatly varies (F1's average speed goes around 160-225kph while MotoGp is around 145-170kph)
PLEASE WATCH THE NEW VIDEO RESPONSES. GREG GIRALDO ROASTING FLAVOR FLAV IS ABSOLUTELY FUNNY, THE FUNIEST 5 MINUTES EVER! THE NEW SPARTACUS WORKOUT 2012 IS BRUTAL!!! YOU SHOULD ALL TRY IT!
yeah but your's is called "Formula 1 Ferrari F150 (Fernando Alonso) acceleration analysis (WITH KERS)" are very specific and the most essential (&general) words "0-100 km/h" and "F1" are missing ;)
they arent allowed to use kers under 100km/h. you can see this also in the video. alonso presses the kers button after he reached 100km/h. so the 2.6 seconds is without kers
@OdrikT800 that's true. If you pay atention the 100-200 time is faster than 0-100 and I think that only the F1 can do that, due to more traction and KERS!
And btw, you like Lost, that's as if made for people who are completely subjective in their beliefs. Not for somebody with even a shred of reason or analytical skills.
However, there's a market for sheep like you. Many sheep is good. You know what they want and you can earn money on their petty needs.
Lewis outdrove alonso with the same car in 2007. Now he also outdid Alonso in the races; just a little unreliable with the DNFs. Hes the only non redbull 2011 pole mind you.
Considering that this is with fuel for the entire race, it is amazing. But I'd like to point out that an empty car would do 200 kph in WAY less than 4.9 when a full car did 5,1, ESPECIALLY if it can hit 100 kph in 1.6. In this video, it did 100-200 in 2.5 s, full tank. You can easily cut that to 2.2 with an empty tank. So, theoretically, 0-100 in 1.6 + 100-200 in 2.2 = 0-200 in 3.8! I bet the real time would be 4.0 or less. 2.4 V8 probably less than 800 hp. In 2005, 3.0 V10 up to 1000 hp.
Hahahaha @ the concept of any street car being this fast.
This car hit 300 km/h in less than half the time it takes for a Murcielago SV to hit 300 km/h.
F1 cars aren't allowed to have all those fancy launch control gizmos, nor do they have AWD. I really can't think of many RWD street cars without launch control that can hit 60 mph in under 4 seconds.
@HFLanciaStratos Are you referring to rear-wheel drive (Sorry I'm Spanish, so I'm not really used to English technical words)? And yeah, haha, I know, I know, it was only a joke. They would really accelerate a bit faster, especially for the 300kmh mark. :) and maybe with a shorter 1st gear they could a little bit faster too, scraping tenths ^_^
@HFLanciaStratos Maybe they could go, with a really good launch, get to 2.0-2.3 in 100km/h, but this is one of the best starts ever made with these cars.
And remember, that is an acceleration run with 160kg of fuel onboard. Take out 140kg of that and then see how fast one of these things will rocket off the line. I'd hazard a guess at 0-100km/h in 2.4 seconds.
Why is everyone comparing the Veyron to a Formula 1 car? Formula 1 cars will absolutely dominate that thing on a racetrack. Its got slick tyres for a start, it produces more downforce, it has a _far_ better power to weight ratio. Veyron might have a faster top speed out of the box, but its not in the same league as a Formula 1 car in every other way.
F1 has a 2,4l engine v10, with rpm and max speed limited to respect the rules of f1 championship...
BTW they can even go faster that 400kmh without the race configuration, and go faster than 0/100 in 2,6 sec with electronic controls etc... but there are really much limitations in FIA rules....
anyway those cars are faster than every other car in a circuit, because their strength is not in straight roads!!
Bugatti is fast, but it's like a rocket: can only go straight...
Comparing F1 cars to a Bugatti? Seriously? The only thing they have in common is that they are fast but that's about it. Oh and yes they both have 4 wheels.
I do not believe that Bugatti beats Formula1 of 0-100. the aerodynamics and tyres of f1 are 100 times better than bugatti . not to mention that on tracks like monaco f1 = 1.5s 0-100
@Zigozag i wouldn't say F1 tyre's are better than the Veyron tyre's , they are more advanced than an aircraft tyre for any conditions.. they cost heaps
@tapPOOH yeah well his start didn't have much to do with KERS. All the others would be using their KERS at the start as well, so it will even it self out. Of cause some team's KERS system are more powerful then others but the difference is a few HP, nothing that will effect the start much. Fernando just nailed the clutch bitepoint and throttle at the start and he then carried that on. As a result he had much better momentum going into T1.
@TheFodone Yes It is, but Bugatti Veyron is a car with AWD ,traction control, 8.000 c.c.and a quad-turbocharged W16 cylinder engine, the 2011 F1 is a car with RWD, no traction control, no turbos and a small 2.400 c.c. V8 engine. and only a difference of 0.1 secs in 0-100¡¡¡¡¡
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
on my 600cc 2010 R6 I go from 0-100 in 3.2sec. and from 0-200 under 10 sec... all for 13,000$ brand new after taxes and all... this F1 cars are overrated.
@Lubinha From memory 0-100 was 2.1 during the 990cc days, Thats probably similar on the 800 as power doesn't matter at that speed but mroe the traction/launch control
bring on the 1000cc :D
It's easy and cheap to go fast but it fucking hard and expensive to go super fast and that the . something of a second on acceleration and cornering.
@ZeroBoostBuick And then... Can you keep that speed in the corners? Well... thought so ;) The F1 cars aren't built to be fast in 0-100, or 0-200 - they are made to be really fast around the whole track!
My Subaru is faster
cognoscenti2011 2 days ago
PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO RESPONSE OF A DOG THAT HATES THE SOUND OF THE HARMONICA! IT'S FUNNY!
Lubinha 3 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
ini mamang terbai
onijeng 4 days ago
The most realistic racing graphics ever : -D
vmproductuons 4 days ago
kimi raikkonen has the best starts
kritonas11 4 days ago
Not sure if game, or real life race because of HUD.
Those graphic quality of games is too damn high!
KiterTMK 6 days ago
@KiterTMK that's real! you dumbass -.-
ClaudioSL619 4 days ago
1.000.000 views!! What a nice birthday gift!
Lubinha 6 days ago 6
@Lubinha 1000 dollars ?
DiamZz 3 days ago
@DiamZz What??
Lubinha 1 day ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This has been flagged as spam show
Alone you have to compare the times in competition of motorcycles and cars of F1 in any circuit, an alone circuit does not exist where a motorcycle (motorcycle gp, superbikes is the same) has better time that one f1, not another vehicle of the world.
VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fernando ＋ F1 = the very Fastest in all categories all over the world.
GalaxyPowerTy 1 week ago
Fast&Furious! Bravo Fernando!
Federal88101 1 week ago
wow at first i think it's a game, but this is real of course
indradinho88 1 week ago
Its simple logic guys a bike will always accelerate much, much faster than a car because of power to weight ratio and being less air resistant. The only reason a formula 1 car beats it around the track is because it can corner faster due to the ridiculous amounts of downforce and four tires. but then of course it wouldnt beat it by much, I am a f1 fan but sit on a stock 1000cc sports bike like a gsxr 1000 and floor it and then you can only imagine what a moto gp would do.
TheSventolini 1 week ago
@TheSventolini drive a Shifter Go-Kart and you will have a idea of how brutal the F1 is!
Lubinha 1 week ago 10
@TheSventolini
It is simple logic but I think you got it wrong..
Motogp+average weight driver+50% fuel, 150kg+65kg+10kg=225kg. With a power output of 240bhp, you get 1.07bhp/kg.
An F1 must at all times be no less than 640 kg. Add 50 kg for 50% fuel = 690 kg. With a power of 750 bhp, you get 1.08 bhp/kg.
The difference is academic but here comes the advantage of 2 wheels over 1 wheel and downforce of F1 to get this power to the road.. For 0-100kmh, 2011 F1 about 2s, 2011 motogp about 2.5s.
charmand79 1 week ago
@TheSventolini Actually thats not the case always. the F1 honda car is faster down a 1 mile strip then a Honda GP bike. And the 0-100 times are pretty much the same. Once the power is down the car will fly passed the bike.
RAGE666ification 1 week ago
@TheSventolini But not by much? Are you kidding? Around silverstone the lap records differ by about 30 seconds.
turtlehater2 1 week ago
@TheSventolini The accelerations are similar, but f1´s are faster. Bikes cant translate all that power into pure acceleration. They cant put the power down as well as a formula 1 car. They are slower than f1´s for some simple resons, they have 2 tyres, less downforce and much less aerodynamics. If it werent for those breaks in monza bikes would do pretty similar times to f1 cars
SennaHamilton4ever 1 week ago
@TheSventolini Yes bikes mostly beat cars but things have changed the past couple of years and a moto gp will lose on a drag race. They even did it on top gear, 1 wheel and so much power will not do...
IStrenghtAndHonorI 6 days ago
@TheSventolini Sorry to say but the bikes is much slower. Not 0-100 but after that and around a track when the F1 car laps the MotoGP has 1/4 of the track left. The MotoGP will be lapped every 4th lap...
Example: Istanbul
Lap Record F1: 1:24.770 (Montoya, 2004)
Lap Record MotoGP: 1' 52.877 (Toni Elias, 2006)
So yes the F1 will beat a bike around a track with alot of time to spare
MrDavidoneo 4 days ago
@TheSventolini F1 gets around 25 seconds faster than a bike, even without downforce it'd be faster, as it'd increase top speed. Bikes are also getting heavier, and less top speedy. And in a start, bikes are also a tiny bit slower, due to the need of the rider kicking off. Take the example of catalunya, even with the revised f1 track to make it slower, the fastest bikes are 20 secs slower than the slowest f1 car.
I wish f1 would return to 1080 bhp, then ptw ratio would be almost on pair ;)!
sjmaco 2 days ago
crazy!Nice fernando
MrTilen007 1 week ago
@MrTilen007 Nando is the #1
Lubinha 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos 5
NoS activated !
floflospeed24 2 weeks ago
just buy an GTR!
niki910921 2 weeks ago
Nice comments, except for the fact that they're all plain bullshit.
MotoGP can't and will never be able to accelerate as quickly as a formula 1 car for the same reason that grand prix cars are much faster in the corners than the motoGP bikes: they have much more contact with the asphalt due to a greater contact surface of rubber. Their tires will simply start spinning around like crazy. Even now the the motoGP and F1 can't use all of their power to accelerate.
PS: In '04/'05, F1's went 360kph.
SJ4y 2 weeks ago
@SJ4y
Except there are bikes you can buy that have gone 0-100kph in 2.5 seconds when tested. So I think MotoGP bikes can very well accelerate faster than F1 cars. Also if a god damn Corvette can do it in less than 3 seconds (one source claimed 1.9 sec), I bet a motorcycle can do it too.
As the uploader said, F1 cars are much quicker in 100-200kph (1.2 sec according to the info) than in 0-100kph. I'm not sure about the 0-160kph in 2.5 seconds that has been claimed in these comments though.
th4970 2 weeks ago
@SJ4y
Also I have to add, if you are talking about the acceleration from 0kph -> top speed, then I have no opinion on that.
th4970 2 weeks ago
@andruut9797 you are yet another American Muscle enthusiast who has no fucking Idea of what you're talking about.
sujjo 2 weeks ago
bugatti it's more faster 0-100 km/h 2.5 sec
skzstyle 2 weeks ago
@skzstyle 0-100 yes but after no, and if you want even faster there are dragsters too !
Philmen 2 weeks ago
@skzstyle Clear and an American dragster does it in less, but to compare a veyron with a F1 it is like to compare a F-18 with a Spitfire
VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA 1 week ago
MotoGp gets to 160kph in 2,5 secs, just saying...
jeffLR91 2 weeks ago
@jeffLR91 where have you seen these numbers?
Lubinha 2 weeks ago
@jeffLR91 They maybe get up to 160 in 2,5 seconds, but I would say, it's more about 3 seconds. Even though, MotoGP is faster when accelerating and it hits higher top speed on the same track as F1, it's so much slower trough corners, it's much slower on brakes, just everything relevant is worse.
SRAMEK 2 weeks ago
@SRAMEK i know but it's quite surprising how can they be faster when their speed through corner is sometimes even 50kph below F1's cornering speed
i remember Capirossi (back in 2003 or so) hitting 345kph at the end of Montmelo's main straight while Schumacher was around 320kph. no car has ever gone over 330kph in Montmelo
and, well, Pedrosa's 355kph at Mugello is impressive to say the least
jeffLR91 2 weeks ago
@jeffLR91 the Moto GP cuts air easily, while the F1 is made to create downforce, not to go fast on the straights. When F1 had the V10s the top speeds were much higher than now with the V8s...
Lubinha 2 weeks ago
@jeffLR91 no it can't. F1 car has better weight to power ratio than the moto GP bike... and an F1 car has ALOT better tyre grip with surface.
If we take F1 car from 1997, it does 0-100km/h for just 1.8 sec.
Davilasammo 2 weeks ago
@jeffLR91 and what about the speed on curves? do you have those numbers too?
goodbued 2 weeks ago
@goodbued not really but the difference about the average speed is usually around 210kph for F1 and 155kph for MotoGp but that greatly varies (F1's average speed goes around 160-225kph while MotoGp is around 145-170kph)
jeffLR91 2 weeks ago
@jeffLR91 maybe in ur dream...
666MrERO 1 week ago
Corvette's 0-100 km/h is 2,5 sec huehuehue
andruut9797 2 weeks ago
@andruut9797 F1 is at it's worst in a 0-100 km/h sprint. It's faster doing 100-200 than 0-100 it's the only car in the world that do that!
Lubinha 2 weeks ago
@Lubinha redbull x2011 's 0-100 km/h is 0.9 sec XD
xXDaNiDrAgOnps3xX 2 weeks ago
mi auto llega de 0-100 en 12.7 segundos :S ajajajjaj
enzoste 2 weeks ago
Prawie jak moja Audica :) ale jeszcze daleko;)
Misialdo14 2 weeks ago
Fernando ＋ F1 = the very Fastest in all categories all over the world.
GalaxyPowerTy 2 weeks ago 3
GRANDE ALONSO
74tommaso 3 weeks ago 2
Spanish power.
jabeivan 3 weeks ago 2
ZARPADISIMO,,,
pepinos1000 3 weeks ago
my car 0-200km/h-clock battery ends
jimmykouf 3 weeks ago
PLEASE WATCH THE NEW VIDEO RESPONSES. GREG GIRALDO ROASTING FLAVOR FLAV IS ABSOLUTELY FUNNY, THE FUNIEST 5 MINUTES EVER! THE NEW SPARTACUS WORKOUT 2012 IS BRUTAL!!! YOU SHOULD ALL TRY IT!
Lubinha 3 weeks ago 4
58 Nascar fans...
Lubinha 4 weeks ago 54
@Lubinha
When this vid attained 1000000 times, you should change tittle of this vid to " Fernando Alonso Super start " And Nascar fans won`t watch anymore.
GalaxyPowerTy 6 days ago
@ASSHOLELA:
yeah but your's is called "Formula 1 Ferrari F150 (Fernando Alonso) acceleration analysis (WITH KERS)" are very specific and the most essential (&general) words "0-100 km/h" and "F1" are missing ;)
guerelk 1 month ago
nice :D
MrWerbungundTutorial 1 month ago
they arent allowed to use kers under 100km/h. you can see this also in the video. alonso presses the kers button after he reached 100km/h. so the 2.6 seconds is without kers
OdrikT800 1 month ago 3
@OdrikT800 that's true. If you pay atention the 100-200 time is faster than 0-100 and I think that only the F1 can do that, due to more traction and KERS!
Lubinha 3 weeks ago 2
@Lubinha KERS?
WilliamTellsShake 3 weeks ago
@Lubinha 870.000 views!
Lubinha 1 month ago
Hmmm F1 2011 looks a little blur
What's video card do you use ?
Driftking7852 1 month ago
@Driftking7852 No idea...
Lubinha 1 month ago
@Lubinha i'm just kidding mf :D
Driftking7852 1 month ago
@Lubinha
give me your secret to views. I have the same videos with a speed analysis ontop and it only has 2,000 views!
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
@ASSHOLELA it's a secret!
Lubinha 1 month ago
BRAVO BRAVO BRAVISIMO===== ALONSO=====.
sin palabrassss!!!!!!
yosoymengano 1 month ago
@yosoymengano Thefuture 2012 World Champion!
Lubinha 1 month ago
@Lubinha
Yeah, they said that in 2011 too, and in 2010, and in 2009...
Metallicakicksbutt 1 month ago
@Metallicakicksbutt in 2010 he almost did it! It he gets a good car he will do it!
Lubinha 1 month ago
f1 car is normally 2.2 secs. the old were 1.5
MrBusunglueck 1 month ago
LOOK‼ Alonso Never did breaking nevertheless he was too close to REDBULLs..
This is the why Alonso is the best:XD
GalaxyPowerTy 1 month ago
@GalaxyPowerTy
Look up the word "subjective".
This is why you will never make a career in law, politics, history or even economy.
You're a one-track-minded sheep.
WASPTexas 1 month ago
@GalaxyPowerTy
And btw, you like Lost, that's as if made for people who are completely subjective in their beliefs. Not for somebody with even a shred of reason or analytical skills.
However, there's a market for sheep like you. Many sheep is good. You know what they want and you can earn money on their petty needs.
WASPTexas 1 month ago
@WASPTexas
Wow. you are amazing animal hunter‼ Very Cool. Will that do?:XD
GalaxyPowerTy 1 month ago
@WASPTexas
And I am a univercityschool student, so I have a few classmates like you....
Most people disregard them...
I sympathy with you and your past that you were bullied by anyone..
I hope you can live better life:xdxdxdxdxd
GalaxyPowerTy 1 month ago
@WASPTexas
And I am a univercityschool student, so I have a few classmates like you....
Most people disregard them...
I sympathy with you and your past that you were bullied by anyone..
I hope you can live better life:xdxdxdxdxd
GalaxyPowerTy 1 month ago
New clutch for Spain GP and this was the result.
djmoshic 1 month ago
only this camera angle makes good f1
esraretin 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IS ALONSO THE BEST F1 DRIVER OF TODAY?
Lubinha 1 month ago 8
@Lubinha
No its lewis hamilton.
Lewis outdrove alonso with the same car in 2007. Now he also outdid Alonso in the races; just a little unreliable with the DNFs. Hes the only non redbull 2011 pole mind you.
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
@ASSHOLELA Ferrari F150th was a piece of shit...
Lubinha 1 month ago
53 IDIOTS
Lubinha 1 month ago
yeah this f1 does 0-300 about as fast as my car does 0-100.
oh who am i kidding.... its faster.
GraveUypo 1 month ago
slip stream......
abdelrrazak 1 month ago
my hyundai accent doing 0-100 immidiately!!!
uberstellz 1 month ago
LADIES AND GENTLEMAN... CHUCK NORRIS!!
alexsoutherner 1 month ago 3
Game!
clausp0612 1 month ago
I can't tell if this is real life footage or from a modern game... Damn you kids and your technology.
KangaWk 1 month ago 9
@KangaWk I can't tell if you are stupid or dumb!
Lubinha 1 month ago 6
@Lubinha wow you really are frustrated.
Jigga9101 1 month ago
@Lubinha son of a bitch, Kanga jk
mocthegame 1 month ago
Comment removed
redfireblast57 1 month ago
@Lubinha i can't tell if your old or aweless.
redfireblast57 1 month ago
@redfireblast57 I can't tell if you are gay or a faggot!
Lubinha 1 month ago
@Lubinha I can't tell why you all make a problem of this and why I'm now making part of it!
marty552 1 month ago
@KangaWk what???????? r u serious?
ilove9ff 1 month ago
ale to zapierdala
fatherbossgrybow 1 month ago
And this is with a full tank
SennaHamilton4ever 1 month ago 52
@SennaHamilton4ever
yup, "only" additional 210kg of weight :O
DigitalBlend69 1 month ago
I read the chronos that you give and OMG how is possible to drive a such powerfull cars with such accelerations as the F1 cars ?!!!
All the pilots of F1 are Jedis Knights !!! ^_^
cumbas 1 month ago
Comment removed
cumbas 1 month ago
0-200 km/h - 5,1s ?? ohhhhhhhhhh.......
czasamitrudno 1 month ago
I noticed that the f1 car shorttshifts at 1st and 2nd gear. why is that so?
ASSHOLELA 1 month ago
@ASSHOLELA because when you give full power the car has no traction and crash into the wall
MegaRacingHD 1 month ago
:'( mi auto tarda 11 seg. en llegar a 100 km/hr ¬¬
ribasz 1 month ago
I'm faster with my Opel Ascona.
Kw12345ff 1 month ago 43
Considering that this is with fuel for the entire race, it is amazing. But I'd like to point out that an empty car would do 200 kph in WAY less than 4.9 when a full car did 5,1, ESPECIALLY if it can hit 100 kph in 1.6. In this video, it did 100-200 in 2.5 s, full tank. You can easily cut that to 2.2 with an empty tank. So, theoretically, 0-100 in 1.6 + 100-200 in 2.2 = 0-200 in 3.8! I bet the real time would be 4.0 or less. 2.4 V8 probably less than 800 hp. In 2005, 3.0 V10 up to 1000 hp.
jakubkrcma 1 month ago
spanish badassness on italian engine, enough said
SonnySonego 1 month ago
Without race fuel and with straight driving they do
0 - 100: 1,6
0 - 200: 4,9
But @ScarmondChannel is right. Those Renaults made even better starts in 2005
Toaster0107 1 month ago
@Toaster0107 yes but they had tc and v10 engines
OdrikT800 1 month ago
Renault R25 - 2005 - V10
0 → 100 km/h : 1,9s
0 → 200 km/h : 3,9s
0 → 300 km/h : 8,4s
ScarmondChannel 1 month ago
Hahahaha @ the concept of any street car being this fast.
This car hit 300 km/h in less than half the time it takes for a Murcielago SV to hit 300 km/h.
F1 cars aren't allowed to have all those fancy launch control gizmos, nor do they have AWD. I really can't think of many RWD street cars without launch control that can hit 60 mph in under 4 seconds.
HFLanciaStratos 1 month ago
Thank you, Alonso‼
You proved F1 car is the best.
GalaxyPowerTy 1 month ago
Alonso :
ur the best of all Times....
Nando 4 ever
depechemode4ever1 1 month ago
if 1 gear short, that f1 car 0-100 for 1 sec
ebanatos 1 month ago
Why are you talking about jets in an F1 video? Go watch your jets. I don't go to jet videos to talk about F1.
Str8representing 1 month ago
Comment removed
Str8representing 1 month ago
ou yes
JordiLesPaul 1 month ago
Holy shit!
SuperBadass1982 1 month ago
that's almost 4sec 0-100
fbazsa11 1 month ago
f1 can go 0-100 in just over 1 second
xavierlert 2 months ago
Today underpowered F1 cars can reach 300 km/h in 9 seconds while Veyron SS only can only dream about it.
SuperThe86 2 months ago
@SuperThe86 This. ^_^, give an f1 car a 1,000bhp capable engine, and it'll reach it in 1second
sjmaco 1 month ago
@sjmaco You seem to be forgetting the concept of traction. F1 cars are RWD and don't have stuff like launch control.
HFLanciaStratos 1 month ago
@HFLanciaStratos Are you referring to rear-wheel drive (Sorry I'm Spanish, so I'm not really used to English technical words)? And yeah, haha, I know, I know, it was only a joke. They would really accelerate a bit faster, especially for the 300kmh mark. :) and maybe with a shorter 1st gear they could a little bit faster too, scraping tenths ^_^
sjmaco 1 month ago
@HFLanciaStratos Maybe they could go, with a really good launch, get to 2.0-2.3 in 100km/h, but this is one of the best starts ever made with these cars.
sjmaco 1 month ago
From 100 to' 200 Is incredible
Enzobitonto 2 months ago
And remember, that is an acceleration run with 160kg of fuel onboard. Take out 140kg of that and then see how fast one of these things will rocket off the line. I'd hazard a guess at 0-100km/h in 2.4 seconds.
Scotracer1987 2 months ago
Why is everyone comparing the Veyron to a Formula 1 car? Formula 1 cars will absolutely dominate that thing on a racetrack. Its got slick tyres for a start, it produces more downforce, it has a _far_ better power to weight ratio. Veyron might have a faster top speed out of the box, but its not in the same league as a Formula 1 car in every other way.
tuftymitchell 2 months ago
F1 has a 2,4l engine v10, with rpm and max speed limited to respect the rules of f1 championship...
BTW they can even go faster that 400kmh without the race configuration, and go faster than 0/100 in 2,6 sec with electronic controls etc... but there are really much limitations in FIA rules....
anyway those cars are faster than every other car in a circuit, because their strength is not in straight roads!!
Bugatti is fast, but it's like a rocket: can only go straight...
Anubi1989 2 months ago
@Anubi1989 2.4l v8, 18000rpm limit (750-800hp)
steflotti105 2 months ago
heey veery nice channel can you see my channel and SUB my THX =D
koranaimasvina 2 months ago
Comparing F1 cars to a Bugatti? Seriously? The only thing they have in common is that they are fast but that's about it. Oh and yes they both have 4 wheels.
aequidens88 2 months ago
is this from a game???
Mercury888 2 months ago
@Mercury888 no its real life, the start of the 2011 spanish grand prix, onboard with alonso
steflotti105 2 months ago
@Mercury888 no this was actual race.
YTchannel007 1 month ago
good job ..... inetresting
miguffx 2 months ago
I do not believe that Bugatti beats Formula1 of 0-100. the aerodynamics and tyres of f1 are 100 times better than bugatti . not to mention that on tracks like monaco f1 = 1.5s 0-100
Zigozag 2 months ago
Comment removed
bosshunterman 2 months ago
Comment removed
bosshunterman 2 months ago
@Zigozag
Bugatti is 4wheel drive + it has almost 5times more torque...
But yeah, with empty tank, F1 still easily beats Bugatti SP on 0-100...
bosshunterman 2 months ago
@Zigozag i wouldn't say F1 tyre's are better than the Veyron tyre's , they are more advanced than an aircraft tyre for any conditions.. they cost heaps
QuickEvolution 2 months ago
@QuickEvolution I would. F1 cars run slicks, Bugatti don't.
That sir, is the end of this argument.
tuftymitchell 2 months ago
@tuftymitchell the end of the argument because they run slicks ? that wasn't even the argument to begin with...
QuickEvolution 1 month ago
ESTA CLARO QUE SON POTENTES (PESO POTENCIA)
saufte7 2 months ago
LA F1 ES UNA MIERDA EL PILOTO NO HACE CASI NADA ,EL COCHE HACE TODO ,FRENA EN LAS CURVAS,,CONOCE EL CIRUITO ,ACELERA........ETC
saufte7 2 months ago
How I can set this speedometer?
yonkaiiku 2 months ago
@yonkaiiku: the green digits dude
guerelk 2 months ago
I love how he smokes the guy on P3 before he even hits the KERS.
tapPOOH 2 months ago
@tapPOOH yeah well his start didn't have much to do with KERS. All the others would be using their KERS at the start as well, so it will even it self out. Of cause some team's KERS system are more powerful then others but the difference is a few HP, nothing that will effect the start much. Fernando just nailed the clutch bitepoint and throttle at the start and he then carried that on. As a result he had much better momentum going into T1.
dude2106 1 month ago
I think I watched this video for about 100 times..
iluvthesdsga 2 months ago
do all you people realise f1 cars are more about cornering speed than straight line speed right??
SonOfTheRightHand29 2 months ago
F1 Renault R25 V10 0-100 km/h 1,7 s. with traction control. These cars today are just too slow.
Avaruusbanaani 2 months ago
@Avaruusbanaani 3-litre V10 engine with 1000 hp, weight 605kg including driver.
Avaruusbanaani 2 months ago
Bugatti veyron is faster o.O!!! 0-100 in 2,4 seconds!!!
TheFodone 2 months ago
@TheFodone Yes It is, but Bugatti Veyron is a car with AWD ,traction control, 8.000 c.c.and a quad-turbocharged W16 cylinder engine, the 2011 F1 is a car with RWD, no traction control, no turbos and a small 2.400 c.c. V8 engine. and only a difference of 0.1 secs in 0-100¡¡¡¡¡
Kimizefa 2 months ago
Just the best...
Axielorza 2 months ago
Thats why Alonso is the best
GalaxyPowerTy 2 months ago
@GalaxyPowerTy i am agree with you
rudy51292 2 months ago
Алосно офигеный чувак так все на*бал xD
VLADOS266 2 months ago
NOTHING can brake better (-5g's) or turn faster (about 4g's) than an F1 car.PERIOD!
BKstrained 2 months ago 20
@BKstrained Except that a jet fighter does round 5G´s aswell
TheV12ferrari 2 months ago
i take the metro :D
dud295 2 months ago
What a great start... Webber should learn from him...
EmersonMartins11 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
on my 600cc 2010 R6 I go from 0-100 in 3.2sec. and from 0-200 under 10 sec... all for 13,000$ brand new after taxes and all... this F1 cars are overrated.
ZeroBoostBuick 2 months ago
@ZeroBoostBuick do you have the acceleration data for a Moto GP bike?
Lubinha 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Lubinha
stock gsxr1000 does 0-100 around 3sec.
0-200 around 7sec.
so an r6 maybe can do 0-200 in 10 seconds.
rasqo3 2 months ago
@Lubinha From memory 0-100 was 2.1 during the 990cc days, Thats probably similar on the 800 as power doesn't matter at that speed but mroe the traction/launch control
bring on the 1000cc :D
It's easy and cheap to go fast but it fucking hard and expensive to go super fast and that the . something of a second on acceleration and cornering.
nguh105 2 months ago
@ZeroBoostBuick so?
emiemiacosta 2 months ago
@ZeroBoostBuick And then... Can you keep that speed in the corners? Well... thought so ;) The F1 cars aren't built to be fast in 0-100, or 0-200 - they are made to be really fast around the whole track!
KennieWollmer 2 months ago