Demolished yes. Nuclear no. America, you are the anomaly. Mass murder your own, how sick is that. You all got bitch slapped on 911. It was a coup. You were all raped that day. And now your rapists are telling you. No it was not rape. It was assault with a friendly weapon. It was a sex act on america. You all got fucked. And the sicko's that are getting away with it beat their meat to these vids. I will invent a lube for ya so next time your gov fucks you in the ass less pain
@Jimbofx911 Did you not even see the plane that hit the towers, AND the fire inside the building? It doesn't need to be over 2000 degrees just to melt the steel. It needs to be close enough to the steel and near it long enough for it to melt. -_-
@malcolmmorin Thank you fisrt of all for not adding insult to an view different from yours. Very civilized and again thatnk You!!!I I have worked with and make explosive matireials so I do have knowledge from black powder to fulminates (high explosive) that I make myself and primers. I have not lost fingers or other body part to the work. Murcury, pure ethanol (95%) and nitric acid and great care are all that is need to make mucury fulminate the most popular detonator for tnt.
In the case of WTC buildings, cutter charges can be seen doing their thing. You may want to check out David Chandler for his ino on 911. In the ruins of the towers you can see best the resuts of hundreds of cutter charges.Core coloms all cut to 90 degrees. It is evident in the partial stairwel that survived. Look at all the coloms, cut to 90 degrees. even massive 4 inch thic 36 by 24 colons are in the rubble cut square at the ends.This is not from a collapse this is a demolition site
I wish that it was not the case. there is no doubt, but the day of 911 was well organized and effective, though the evidence at this crime scene was mostly destroyed, the videos, of the debris of the towers taken by Kurt Sonnenfeld and others will not go away. Yes planes were flown into the towers, but that was part of a lagrer plan. What brought the towers down were explosives. Someone needs to face justice.Exposure of these criminals and their prosecution will only benifit America
@Jimbofx911 As for the term nuclear, well I doubt that. With uranium a minimum of 240 grams is need for a bomb, but the problem is caseing and a det charge for it. To bulky, awkward and hard to hide, much of the mini-nuke mumbo jumbo. A nuclear bomb that could be effective will not fit in a suitcase. Aslo radio active matter would be very easy to detect, and I am sure there was none. A mini nuke is hundereds of pounds completed not 10 tonnes.
@MrSammo1 The explosives that left the egg shape craters were indeed very powerful. Yes bedrock melted and did pool. I really cannot say what other then a nuke of some kind could melt bedrock. I do think that so many different types of tools for that trade have been created and tested, many keep from the eye of the general public. I tend to think non-nuke but have no idea what else may have been used.
@Jimbofx911 Much of the rubble pile shows cutter charge usage and the massif corrosion of the box outer frame even as it was in free fall show rapid oxidizing agents were planted inside the outer frames. Odd are good the rest of the job was planned with conventional tools.
@MrSammo1 When beryllium is used in nukes it reduces to a form of carbon. Beryllium may have come from computes and the actual steel of the building as it and molidium or molly oxide were part of the steel formula used on twin towers.
@MrSammo1 Sorry you feel that way. I know 911 was planned and the towers were demolished. I just rather think facts not speculation must be used to resolve the who what where when and why of the event. Fact is used in courts, thats what will collar these criminals.
Just so you know, it is hard to think that nuke may indeed have been used. If they were and yes there is a good chance they were , it would have been in the sub-basements to break the connection between the bedrock and the cores. In fact years earlier, upon reflection the 500 pounds of liquid high explosives fell far short of the energy needed to do the job. Seems they learned from the first failed FBI attempt. I am an orgainc chemist, with limited interest or knowledge in nukes.
@Jimbofx911 Only a nuke makes sense as to the total vaporisation of tires and the wire ply in them that is absent in the images and the vaporization of organic matirials in the cars busses ect. Also the molten bedrock would be hard to produce without the heat of a thermo nuclear device. Again the beryllium may have been from steel vaporized. Beryllium from a nuke forms a carbon type. Just to be clear.
Not nuclear bombs UNLESS there is a way to make FUSION bombs without any FISSION. FISSION leaves too much evidence. I don't reject it out of hand that FUSION bombs can be triggered by other than FISSION, but it would be a HUGE advance in physics if true. It would be a greater achievement than the original Manhattan Project, by far. It would be the greatest achievement in physics so far. The Holy Grail of nuclear power is clean fusion reactors.
Fascinating; a missile that is identified as a passenger aircraft by more than 100 eyewitnesses, uses commercial aircraft engines & dispenses commercial aircraft parts when it explodes.
LOL... Now you idiots think nukes were involved?.. How big of a retard do you have to be, to be a truther?.. Why do you idiots think it's been almost 50 years, and nobody has figured out who the 2nd shooter on the grassy knoll was?.. Because there was no 2nd shooter on the grassy knoll, idiots!..
@roo7227 You're right, people are taking the event out of context with outrageous theories. I can't say what tore those bulky buildings down, cause I have no proof of it. All I can do is question, and wonder why Solomon Bros. building collapsed hours after, yet the buildings smallest and closest to WTC didn't... (#5, & #6) Which took SERIOUS damage and debris, but were still standing throughout all the trauma. Regardless, the theories are becoming more and more ridiculous. Please stop.
Very interesting. There is no way that stairwell could be there if the building came down on its own. It's not going to skip a spot. Thanks for the watch, I've passed it along.
make a circle within a square that fits inside, now offset that a bit outside to one side diagonally and you can see the damage of the nuke could easily have left one stairwell (partially) intact, since the bomb had to be on a side not to destroy/contaminte or weaken the basement of other surrounding buildings or damage "the bathtub".
@152czar, lots of tritium reported that day. Please study the Pentagon with more detail. Also look up Dimitry Khalezov. Would love your opinion on him. Not saying I agree, but he really says some harsh things regarding the Pentagon and what punctured through all 5 rings....and I'm sure we may not all agree on WHAT it was, but we can all agree it wasn't a sluggish, fat 757 piloted by a teenage flight school drop-out with a box cutter from Walmart...
Yet another stupid, disrespectful conspiracy theorist. Missing steel? There was steel all over the place!!!! Just because the collapse caused a mushroom cloud doesn't make a "small nuclear bomb". That assumption just makes you both stupid and ignorant all at once.
Stupid and Ignorant have basically the same overall meaning... So then that comment makes you which one? It's not a conspiracy. But it wasn't a bunch of jackoffs with boxcutters. I was done to give our federal reserve a right of passage to have our government send the military to the mid-east so that we can take their oil for cheaper and sell it for more than our own. Why do you think we spilled oil right here in the gulf... twice. Because foriegn oil is more expensive for consumers. IT'S ALL $.
@JRNY07 , wasn't a bomb my friend, but it certainly wasn't a little JET FUEL. 1) FDNY radio transmissions stating the '2 small pockets of fire are almost out' were blocked' from the 911 INVESTIGATION along with 2) FAA tapes destroyed for first time in history along with 3) the fact that the towers already had a nuclear peacetime demolition blue print along with 4) 6 of 10 commission heads saying the entire thing was a MASSIVE COVER UP....all of this is all just a coincidence I'm sure :)
@JRNY07 , missing steel??? How about an entire missing BUILDING?!? A 150 Kiloton nuclear demolition (which is also known as a GROUND ZERO in nuclear jargon) was 50 meters below each tower & already existed since the early 70's & created a 5.5 Richter Scale earthquake and take approx. 10-15 seconds to disintegrate the tower. Research all local university GEO recordings for that morning and see that TWO earthquakes were recorded that morning. Coincidence each tower came down 10 sec's after each :)
@facebookprogrammer Yeah its a coincidence, because of the fact that New York City is still standing, there were no reports of radiation, and any A Bomb from the 70s would most likely have just fizzled instead of reaching critical mass.
@Waroftheworlds112, my friend these are designed with awesome precision and calculation. Doesn't matter if they were made in the late 60's (not 70's according to the peace treaty for building demolition between the US/former Soviet Union)...the half-life is over 24,000 years.
@facebookprogrammer I doesn't matter how great these were designed, there are too many risks that they would have to over look. The first stage explosives could have malfunctioned, the wiring could have become corroded, water damage could have run rampant. They couldn't have used atomic bomb, especially 150 kts, because lower Manhattan would be rubble, and there would be a giant sinkhole at ground zero. Saying that Tesla's eathquake machine did it makes more sense than an A bomb.
@Waroftheworlds112 Good point my friend, I have studied some of Dr Judy Wood's works & they do make sense as she covers this intensely. For example, she explains some of the charred NYPD cruisers with specific parts of their engines melted out but not others depending on material. Plus, she starts mentioning some strange HAARP-type storm not far from WTC that nobody reported on that day. By the way, just by coincidence, I watched Die Hard part 1 yesterday...makes u wonder where the gold went ;)
@facebookprogrammer I have to thank you for being mature in this and not a troll. And what gold are you talking about? In my years believing these conspiracies, I've never heard anything about gold.
Okay, you convinced me. But now I'm curious about a couple things: A: Were these REAL nukes, or just Atomic bombs? Or were they the real suped up 2-stage Cobalt-salted Hydrogen bombs? B: Were these bombs carried in the "pod", or delivered via the "ball", or beamed in using the dircted energy weapons beam?
@offamychain this is the dumbest thing ever. they were none of them. there is no "small nuclear bombs. they would have destroyed everything around them not just the towers. also, there would have been a nuclear fallout. there would still be to much radiation for people to go there. and that spire was actually the corner of the building.
Why were no explosions heard prior to the building collapsing. In every video of buidlings being demolished you clearly hear the charges going off prior to the building imploding. Why don't we hear this when each wtc towers collapses?
@peepnklown yes most people that believed in the conspiracy theories feel that it was controlled demolition with regular c4. they actually shut down the towers the weekend before for so called "maintenance" . also, it was stated that tower 7 was a controlled demolition.
That thing disappears.
dukeraul624 1 month ago
Demolished yes. Nuclear no. America, you are the anomaly. Mass murder your own, how sick is that. You all got bitch slapped on 911. It was a coup. You were all raped that day. And now your rapists are telling you. No it was not rape. It was assault with a friendly weapon. It was a sex act on america. You all got fucked. And the sicko's that are getting away with it beat their meat to these vids. I will invent a lube for ya so next time your gov fucks you in the ass less pain
I wont hurt as bad.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 Did you not even see the plane that hit the towers, AND the fire inside the building? It doesn't need to be over 2000 degrees just to melt the steel. It needs to be close enough to the steel and near it long enough for it to melt. -_-
malcolmmorin 2 months ago
@malcolmmorin Thank you fisrt of all for not adding insult to an view different from yours. Very civilized and again thatnk You!!!I I have worked with and make explosive matireials so I do have knowledge from black powder to fulminates (high explosive) that I make myself and primers. I have not lost fingers or other body part to the work. Murcury, pure ethanol (95%) and nitric acid and great care are all that is need to make mucury fulminate the most popular detonator for tnt.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
In the case of WTC buildings, cutter charges can be seen doing their thing. You may want to check out David Chandler for his ino on 911. In the ruins of the towers you can see best the resuts of hundreds of cutter charges.Core coloms all cut to 90 degrees. It is evident in the partial stairwel that survived. Look at all the coloms, cut to 90 degrees. even massive 4 inch thic 36 by 24 colons are in the rubble cut square at the ends.This is not from a collapse this is a demolition site
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
I wish that it was not the case. there is no doubt, but the day of 911 was well organized and effective, though the evidence at this crime scene was mostly destroyed, the videos, of the debris of the towers taken by Kurt Sonnenfeld and others will not go away. Yes planes were flown into the towers, but that was part of a lagrer plan. What brought the towers down were explosives. Someone needs to face justice.Exposure of these criminals and their prosecution will only benifit America
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 As for the term nuclear, well I doubt that. With uranium a minimum of 240 grams is need for a bomb, but the problem is caseing and a det charge for it. To bulky, awkward and hard to hide, much of the mini-nuke mumbo jumbo. A nuclear bomb that could be effective will not fit in a suitcase. Aslo radio active matter would be very easy to detect, and I am sure there was none. A mini nuke is hundereds of pounds completed not 10 tonnes.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 At best a nuke would be a dirty bomb catagory device. Ant there really is no signs of that.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 What else explains the resolidified rock?
MrSammo1 2 months ago
@MrSammo1 The explosives that left the egg shape craters were indeed very powerful. Yes bedrock melted and did pool. I really cannot say what other then a nuke of some kind could melt bedrock. I do think that so many different types of tools for that trade have been created and tested, many keep from the eye of the general public. I tend to think non-nuke but have no idea what else may have been used.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 Much of the rubble pile shows cutter charge usage and the massif corrosion of the box outer frame even as it was in free fall show rapid oxidizing agents were planted inside the outer frames. Odd are good the rest of the job was planned with conventional tools.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 There's also the beryllium poisoning that the workers died from.
MrSammo1 2 months ago
@MrSammo1 When beryllium is used in nukes it reduces to a form of carbon. Beryllium may have come from computes and the actual steel of the building as it and molidium or molly oxide were part of the steel formula used on twin towers.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
@Jimbofx911 Is that the best you guys at Langley can do? Carbon? Computers?
Shill peacefully.
MrSammo1 2 months ago
@MrSammo1 Sorry you feel that way. I know 911 was planned and the towers were demolished. I just rather think facts not speculation must be used to resolve the who what where when and why of the event. Fact is used in courts, thats what will collar these criminals.
Jimbofx911 2 months ago
Just so you know, it is hard to think that nuke may indeed have been used. If they were and yes there is a good chance they were , it would have been in the sub-basements to break the connection between the bedrock and the cores. In fact years earlier, upon reflection the 500 pounds of liquid high explosives fell far short of the energy needed to do the job. Seems they learned from the first failed FBI attempt. I am an orgainc chemist, with limited interest or knowledge in nukes.
Jimbofx911 1 month ago
@Jimbofx911 Only a nuke makes sense as to the total vaporisation of tires and the wire ply in them that is absent in the images and the vaporization of organic matirials in the cars busses ect. Also the molten bedrock would be hard to produce without the heat of a thermo nuclear device. Again the beryllium may have been from steel vaporized. Beryllium from a nuke forms a carbon type. Just to be clear.
Jimbofx911 1 month ago
@inyaneck1 I hate to laugh at others (including the vid makers) but your "flawless logic" literally made me lol. Thanks for the laugh :)
cmottes 2 months ago
Not nuclear bombs UNLESS there is a way to make FUSION bombs without any FISSION. FISSION leaves too much evidence. I don't reject it out of hand that FUSION bombs can be triggered by other than FISSION, but it would be a HUGE advance in physics if true. It would be a greater achievement than the original Manhattan Project, by far. It would be the greatest achievement in physics so far. The Holy Grail of nuclear power is clean fusion reactors.
Skeptic121 3 months ago
Flawless logic
inyaneck1 4 months ago
Fuck all that, who is fucking humming while he plays the piano!
mohamedsucksdick 5 months ago
fuck all THAT.....WHAT ABOUT THE MiSSile that HIT THE PENTAGON...AND THAT WAS A MISSILE UNLESS UR BLIND
StayiNAddiCtED 5 months ago
@StayiNAddiCtED
Fascinating; a missile that is identified as a passenger aircraft by more than 100 eyewitnesses, uses commercial aircraft engines & dispenses commercial aircraft parts when it explodes.
GARGLER42 5 months ago
LOL... Now you idiots think nukes were involved?.. How big of a retard do you have to be, to be a truther?.. Why do you idiots think it's been almost 50 years, and nobody has figured out who the 2nd shooter on the grassy knoll was?.. Because there was no 2nd shooter on the grassy knoll, idiots!..
roo7227 6 months ago
@roo7227 You're right, people are taking the event out of context with outrageous theories. I can't say what tore those bulky buildings down, cause I have no proof of it. All I can do is question, and wonder why Solomon Bros. building collapsed hours after, yet the buildings smallest and closest to WTC didn't... (#5, & #6) Which took SERIOUS damage and debris, but were still standing throughout all the trauma. Regardless, the theories are becoming more and more ridiculous. Please stop.
ClubBangerTV 6 months ago
Very interesting. There is no way that stairwell could be there if the building came down on its own. It's not going to skip a spot. Thanks for the watch, I've passed it along.
lkirsner 7 months ago
make a circle within a square that fits inside, now offset that a bit outside to one side diagonally and you can see the damage of the nuke could easily have left one stairwell (partially) intact, since the bomb had to be on a side not to destroy/contaminte or weaken the basement of other surrounding buildings or damage "the bathtub".
SankaraChe 8 months ago
This video is entirely false, and purely a conspiricy theory.
AndehX 9 months ago
@AndehX 9/11: North Tower "Spire" Collapse
actual vid showing vaporization of solid steel towering tall over 52 story WTC7. Vaporized before they fell to level of top of WTC 7 Solomon Blg.
NIST has no explanation, there hand was forced to include WTC 7 in report.
More than twelve 911 commissioners have stated its a controlled inquiry run out of WH. "Setup to FAIL" - Kean-Hamilton
Gee what could be the motive to mass murder 3330 people ?
euro944t 9 months ago
@AndehX Thank you.
TheRevJonnyNemo 6 months ago
small nukes allegations are baseless. NO RADIATION FOUND. NO FALLOUT. THIS IS DISINFO.
152czar 10 months ago
@152czar, lots of tritium reported that day. Please study the Pentagon with more detail. Also look up Dimitry Khalezov. Would love your opinion on him. Not saying I agree, but he really says some harsh things regarding the Pentagon and what punctured through all 5 rings....and I'm sure we may not all agree on WHAT it was, but we can all agree it wasn't a sluggish, fat 757 piloted by a teenage flight school drop-out with a box cutter from Walmart...
facebookprogrammer 10 months ago
Yet another stupid, disrespectful conspiracy theorist. Missing steel? There was steel all over the place!!!! Just because the collapse caused a mushroom cloud doesn't make a "small nuclear bomb". That assumption just makes you both stupid and ignorant all at once.
JRNY07 1 year ago
Stupid and Ignorant have basically the same overall meaning... So then that comment makes you which one? It's not a conspiracy. But it wasn't a bunch of jackoffs with boxcutters. I was done to give our federal reserve a right of passage to have our government send the military to the mid-east so that we can take their oil for cheaper and sell it for more than our own. Why do you think we spilled oil right here in the gulf... twice. Because foriegn oil is more expensive for consumers. IT'S ALL $.
82thadangerous1 1 year ago
@JRNY07 , wasn't a bomb my friend, but it certainly wasn't a little JET FUEL. 1) FDNY radio transmissions stating the '2 small pockets of fire are almost out' were blocked' from the 911 INVESTIGATION along with 2) FAA tapes destroyed for first time in history along with 3) the fact that the towers already had a nuclear peacetime demolition blue print along with 4) 6 of 10 commission heads saying the entire thing was a MASSIVE COVER UP....all of this is all just a coincidence I'm sure :)
facebookprogrammer 1 year ago
@JRNY07 , missing steel??? How about an entire missing BUILDING?!? A 150 Kiloton nuclear demolition (which is also known as a GROUND ZERO in nuclear jargon) was 50 meters below each tower & already existed since the early 70's & created a 5.5 Richter Scale earthquake and take approx. 10-15 seconds to disintegrate the tower. Research all local university GEO recordings for that morning and see that TWO earthquakes were recorded that morning. Coincidence each tower came down 10 sec's after each :)
facebookprogrammer 1 year ago
@facebookprogrammer Yeah its a coincidence, because of the fact that New York City is still standing, there were no reports of radiation, and any A Bomb from the 70s would most likely have just fizzled instead of reaching critical mass.
Waroftheworlds112 10 months ago
@Waroftheworlds112, my friend these are designed with awesome precision and calculation. Doesn't matter if they were made in the late 60's (not 70's according to the peace treaty for building demolition between the US/former Soviet Union)...the half-life is over 24,000 years.
facebookprogrammer 10 months ago 2
@facebookprogrammer I doesn't matter how great these were designed, there are too many risks that they would have to over look. The first stage explosives could have malfunctioned, the wiring could have become corroded, water damage could have run rampant. They couldn't have used atomic bomb, especially 150 kts, because lower Manhattan would be rubble, and there would be a giant sinkhole at ground zero. Saying that Tesla's eathquake machine did it makes more sense than an A bomb.
Waroftheworlds112 10 months ago
@Waroftheworlds112 Good point my friend, I have studied some of Dr Judy Wood's works & they do make sense as she covers this intensely. For example, she explains some of the charred NYPD cruisers with specific parts of their engines melted out but not others depending on material. Plus, she starts mentioning some strange HAARP-type storm not far from WTC that nobody reported on that day. By the way, just by coincidence, I watched Die Hard part 1 yesterday...makes u wonder where the gold went ;)
facebookprogrammer 10 months ago
@facebookprogrammer I have to thank you for being mature in this and not a troll. And what gold are you talking about? In my years believing these conspiracies, I've never heard anything about gold.
Waroftheworlds112 10 months ago
The first couple of seconds made me laugh so hard! SMALL NUCLEAR BOMBS...HA!
CRUHL49 1 year ago
@CRUHL49
That's because the uploader is trying to discredit alternate theories, and the people who propose them.
N37BU6 1 year ago
@CRUHL49 , I used to say the same then I googled DIMITRI KHALEZOV. Interesting 26-part series I watched and was like WTF?!?
facebookprogrammer 1 year ago
Okay, you convinced me. But now I'm curious about a couple things: A: Were these REAL nukes, or just Atomic bombs? Or were they the real suped up 2-stage Cobalt-salted Hydrogen bombs? B: Were these bombs carried in the "pod", or delivered via the "ball", or beamed in using the dircted energy weapons beam?
offamychain 1 year ago
@offamychain this is the dumbest thing ever. they were none of them. there is no "small nuclear bombs. they would have destroyed everything around them not just the towers. also, there would have been a nuclear fallout. there would still be to much radiation for people to go there. and that spire was actually the corner of the building.
heavymetalguy21 1 year ago
and atomic bombs are stronger than nukes.
heavymetalguy21 1 year ago
Why were no explosions heard prior to the building collapsing. In every video of buidlings being demolished you clearly hear the charges going off prior to the building imploding. Why don't we hear this when each wtc towers collapses?
4knobby7 1 year ago
Google "9/11 Cancers"
WTCnucleardemolition 2 years ago
@WTCnucleardemolition thats from all of the debris and materials that the workers inhaled at the site.
heavymetalguy21 1 year ago
Looka at my video about core columns in WTC.
Marech1984 2 years ago
I dont know about nuclear bombs being used but, its an interesting thought.
Controlled Demolition with regular explosives would create a similar scene.
peepnklown 2 years ago
It's a great way of keeping people in the government quiet.
National security!
MrSammo1 2 years ago
@peepnklown yes most people that believed in the conspiracy theories feel that it was controlled demolition with regular c4. they actually shut down the towers the weekend before for so called "maintenance" . also, it was stated that tower 7 was a controlled demolition.
heavymetalguy21 1 year ago
extremely interesting.
5*****stars.
probinsontx 2 years ago