If those books you showed on camera were from the book store, I do think people in my area will sure buy them. It will be a waste of time reading those books.
@MisterMcKinney Its because it was briefly a creature that caused concern for the theory of evolution. Briefly. It didn't seem to make sense, but now it does. Creationists can't get over this.
@RickelodeonKritiken@tomaf I was kidding, for one, and for two, I used the wrong word. I know it is a bookstore, but I accidentally called it a library. No big deal.
How long will the religion of evolutionism infiltrate science? The belief that populations of animals tha are clearly not [finches] (or pick any animal) can evolve over generations eventually into [finches].. Not observable, not able to be shown in a test case, not science.
Or what about the supernatural belief being called science that absolutely nothing can create everything?
Or what about the supernatural belief that all matter, energy and laws of nature just happen to be eternal.
@ForumLight Go pick up a book about evolution and or the big bang and you'll see that it's not unproven and not supernatural at all, though it does not exclude a supernatural creator. At least do so before making more straw men.
"/watch?v=uyCkADmNdNo&feature=relmful_video_title" this is a good basic video about how we know the big bang happened. If you have any interest in a debate then you can message me, it would be my delight even though I am not as educated on the subject as some others.
Any Christian fundamentalist could walk through the science section & spout off ridiculous criticisms without actually having read the books. By the way, the bacterial flagellum has been rebutted, not refuted.
@drinksmith87 The argument that the bacterial flagellum is irreducible is refuted it has been shown that a major part can be used to perform another function, & that its minor parts can be combined to perform other functions. Its only rebutted to those that cannot let go of yet another false argument, & some would probably go so far to say it hasn't even been rebutted.
@robvlob Would you mind offering a book, a name, or other source of reference documenting the experiment that refutes the irreducibility of the bacterial flagellum? If I am to concede this point as a false argument, I would indeed like to know that it's truly false, and not merely because it's being asserted as false.
@drinksmith87 /watch?v=0hW7ddJOWko Dr. Ken Miller a Christian Biologist demonstrates the IC argument to be false by breaking down the flagellum using a major part as a whole(10 of its 50) & explains its function.
I was very wrong and blind. There really is a God. Atheists are amazing, yes. Amazingly blind. Thankyou, Jesus, you've saved me from Hell. I'm sorry for all the people that I helped send to Hell with my ignorance. :°(
@stonemetallica Why not? I hope everyone does that, and I hope they keep doing it. The only abuse here is by the Christians polluting the science section with this crap.
GO TO HELL U ATHIEST PEICE OF TRASH. I HOPE U ROT IN HELL BASTARD!!!!! the worlod is to unique to have been created by science. fuck scientific evolution and athiest scums like u. GAY PIECE OF SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@jamrock391 typical religious asshole doing anything they can to block all of the facts from entering their small brains in order to keep the beliefs that their parents raised you to believe. one thing that religious people dont understand is that every single creature is born atheist, not believing that a god created everything blah blah blah...
@jamrock391 Science did not create the world. science is the study and explanation of how the universe formed and the laws that govern how it works. not a mystical magical power.
@jamrock391 unique? how do you little insect in this great universe know? We are nothing. And even if you think so, nobody cares about us exept ourselfs.
The real "scum" on the face of the earth are not atheists nor religious people. The scum on the face of this planet are such hatefull people like you.
The book could have just been misplaced you worthless, pathetic fucking piece of degrading shit! The Amazing Atheist?.......more like TheAmazingDumbass! Might as well just rip off your own dick, burrow it out and smoke it.
I am not a fundamentalist Christian but I do not adhere to strict Darwinism. Science and Faith can easily coexist. Some of the most advanced scientific theories have been advocated by people of Faith. You confuse fundamentalist Faith with all of Christianity. The missing link has not been found, in fact recent scientific findings have supported "man" as we know him to be separate and distinct. Christians can believe in evolution but acknowledge God to be the "spark".
@ScripsitVeritas No you can't, the bible says that your god created everything exactly as is, so by believing in evolution you are basically saying the bible, "the all knowing world of god," is wrong.
@5StarGeneralXenoCO Your theology is as a fundamentalist. The majority of Christianity is not fundamentalist. It is Catholic or Orthodox, the oldest Churches in Christendom. Our theology believes the Bible to be the inspired Word but is not a scientific or absolute historical document. The Old Testament uses stories to convey a point. In Genesis, no one can say a "day" is our day, since God has no time. The Creation story timeline can easily span millions of years in human time.
@5StarGeneralXenoCO not at all man, the bible as many other sacred texts are symbollical so a Christian or catholic believeing that evolution is plausible has no contradiction with his/her previous faith.
the only real illution is that science and religion can not share a goal or are two separate unmixable things. the all knowing God, may have created the world through evolution
Why do you think it important to dog Christians .Are you that starved for attention didnt mummie give you enough hugs ? Listen I dont believe science is hokum ,and I am a Christian .I believe God is the spark that started all of this ,including the big bang .There are mysteries on this planet the likes you or I have no comprehension of .To say we know it all is utter arrogance ,and something will come along to blow those theories completely out of the water .It happens constantly
Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
If you like reading books,a good one on this topic is The Collapse of Evolution by Scott M. Huse. Another good book is Darwin’s Black Box by Michael J. Behe, a Professor of Biochemistry. There is one advantage to a book—you can carry it around more easily than your computer, and you do not need an Internet connection, either! Both of these books qualify as “best sellers.”
What makes the flood important to our topic is all the evidence it left around. For one thing, pretty much everything that did not live in water would have been killed in a yearlong flood. This would have left an enormous layer of dead things that would later become coal and oil . . . and leave fossils. It is evident to everyone, as we view our dwindling energy resources, that a lot of material was left in the ground at one time
@000SMITH000 Actually I have seen theories stating that back when the earth was first formed, it was a molten piece of rock, which then cooled off, producing tons of rain. This is the theory as to where we get our oceans. After that, the world freezes and turns into a big ball of ice. So yes, the earth was at one point a "water world", but this was back in the Archaean era, and WAY before humans arrived.
It is interesting that the formation of the earth proposed by noted astronomer (astrophysicist) Hugh Ross has the exact same order as the creation account given in Genesis chapter 1.
@HANDLEtheHERETIC I'm not sure how "noted" Hugh Ross is, since he is basically a bible thumper in a white lab coat. Of course his findings agree with the nonsense in Genesis, he is a believer.
How did humans (and everything else) come into existence? The only explanation you will find in public school and university textbooks is the theory of evolution. Yet, no scientific, provable evidence supporting the theory of evolution has emerged since Charles Darwin popularized it in 1859.
@HANDLEtheHERETIC The theory of evolution has nothing to do with how humans came into existence. Also, since the theory of evolution was first proposed, there have been literally thousands of pieces of evidence supporting it's claims...including transitional fossils and DNA examples. If you get a chance, check out a website called Talk Origins Archive: Evolution. It's got a lot of good info on evolution.
1 Corinthians 15:41 There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory.
All stars look alike to the naked eye.Even when seen through a telescope, they seem to be just points of light. However, analysis of their light spectra reveals that each is unique and different from all others.
The Bible suggests the presence of nuclear processes like those we associate with nuclear weaponry. This is certainly not something that could have been explained in 67 AD using known scientific principles (when Peter wrote the following verse).
2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up.
@XxIncarnationxX The Old Testament was written over a long period, beginning with Moses and finnished long before Christ. The New Testament was written shortly after Christ and preserved via Christians long before satan developed the Roman Catholic church. Since the Bible exposes the politicians in Rome, the vatican burned Bibles and the readers, and rewrote history so the gullible wouldn't know.
I was very wrong and blind. There really is a God. Atheists are amazing, yes. Amazingly blind. Thankyou, Jesus, you've saved me from Hell.
And thankyou LaughingAtAtheists, SMARTERthanATHEISTS,atheistRblind, and Al333555. John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
@AmazingAtheistst It's funny how people think the Christian bible was created during the life of Jesus, while it was actually created by Constantine and some Bishops in around 800 to 900 AD.
Other than that, they were stories passed down from generation to generation for about 900 years.
ATHEISTS HAVE NO EXCUSE Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Hey, I hate to be the one to break it to y'all; but, you know that cartoon they showed you in school where man is supposedly evolving and your great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great,...grandpa was a monkey? It's not true. It's a disproven myth. They made it up. It's just a cartoon.
Hey, I hate to be the one to break it to y'all; but, you know that cartoon they showed you in school where man is supposedly evolving and your great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great,...grandpa was a monkey? It's not true. It's a disproven myth. They made it up. It's just a cartoon.
Isa 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! 5:21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight! Jer 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned ALREADY because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
@chrisxy The advancement of music, science,art, freedom, knowledge, etc. skyrocketed AFTER the Bible was put into English because it gave man faith that the universe was orderly.
@Helpforheretics Yeah, the bible gave people music. However scientist invented instruments.
Also if god created the world, who created god? Most people say that "Nothing created everything" Can't be real, so that means god must be real. That doesn't make sense. How was god created? That stupid theory contradicts with itself. Also helpforheretics. Go help yourself. Its more evil to try to convert people.
@TheShadowTreasurer The prophets made enouph predictions about the first coming of Christ that it is mathematically impossible that they weren't inspired, and this is taking into consideration just a fraction of the fulfilled events. And we aren't talking a about the Jean Dixon-Nostradamus school of junk "prophecy" either. The odds have been worked out to 10 to the 257th power, which is such a astronomically large number that there aren't that many electrons in the known universe.
@ItheSwick You are full of bluff. You know that you don't know what you are talking about. I know that you don't know what you are talking about. And you know that I know that you don't know what you are talking about.
@ItheSwick The Bible is always way ahead of science. The "science" you are thinking a about is "science falsely so called" . When every body thought the earth was flat, the Bible said it was round. When millions were dying of the black plague, the jews survived by following Old Testament sanitation laws. Fast transportation was foretold. When the political scientists said that the Jews could never return to Isreal, they did anyways. It goes much deeper ...You do know they found Noah's ark?
@rnalithe00 Besides the hypocrisy and ignorance, you might not be so bad. Creationists don't believe things just popped into existence-hence, this is why they are Creationists. God didn't pop into existence, either. He's always existed-that's why He's God, and you're not.
@rnalithe00 I haven't seen any self-exsisting computers. But, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Dell found a stash of them buried next to Lucy (a 3' tall chimpanzee), Heidelburg Man (built from a human jawbone), Nebraska Man (built from the tooth of an extinct pig), Piltdown Man (built from the jaw of a modern ape), Neanderthal Man (proven to be a man with arthritis), Cro-Magnon Man (equal in physique and brain capacity as modern man, so what's the difference?).
Many Christians want to believe so badly they will ignore scientific evidence, reason, common sense and their own better judgment. Religions have perverted the meaning of the word "truth." The Websters Dictionary definition says what the word means: truth: "being in accord with fact or reality" - Search for "Church of Innerspace" in Google and read what it says. It is not what you think it is.
Could we classify every OTHER as "Atheist" propaganda? Neither one of them is a known fact, it's just a matter of opinion. We can't prove creation OR evolution as fact. But there will always be prayer before important government meetings, there will always be "In God we trust" on our currency, God will always be in the final verse of the national anthem, and "CREATED equal" will always be in the constitution. If I can tolerate it, so can you. And being atheist doesn't make you smart.
@ItheSwick "We can't prove creation OR evolution as fact." Get your science straight and then you could maybe talk with some authority. Of course, most creationists aren't interested in doing so because it blows up their fairitale. I couldn't care less about currency and other formalisms because they're just that, anachronic formalisms, anyone with half a brain knows that. And being theist doesen't make you better. In any sense whatsoever.
"Could we classify every OTHER as "Atheist" propaganda?"
Not unless the books tell you that there is no god. Unless there it is suggested in phyiscs.
The concept is easy: These books are about science, especially about physics. They are not supposed to talk about god or a lack of god unless there is a reason to do so in phyisics.
"Neither one of them is a known fact, it's just a matter of opinion."
Well, ultimately yes, but at least science works as shows your comuter for example.
If someone told you that your computer self-exisisted without anyone ever designing it, I hope you would say they were nuts.
How long would it take for a jet fighter to form itself by chance, say in the ground, without a designer? A million years? A billion years? A million billion years? It'll NEVER happen. Man is designed infinitely more complicated, yet you want me to believe it was by chance? Are you crazy?
You're saying a complex thing like a computer can't self-exist, but a super-complex deity can?
If you want to prove to us that you're enlightened, perhaps you should not only find out what your opponent's position is, but also what yours is. Nobody except creationists claim/believe complex things just pop out of nowhere from nothing.
LOL It aint SciFi neither, SciFi is based in a possibility based in factual reality about human development. I guess it belongs where they put Mythology.
@kagairu How so? I'm just curious. Intelligent design is not science, and therefore doesn't belong in the science section. Anyone who is at all educated in science would agree. Seems completely reasonable to me.
God CANNOT be scientific, because God is an unfalsifiable hypothesis. In order for even a hypothesis to be scientific, it must be FALSIFIABLE, through experimental tests. Some bullshit like "The Design of Life" shouldn't be in the science section of the bookstore.
@TheMosesProductions yeah I agree with his view, not refuting that, just didn't like the way he was delivering it. there are ways to make a point being without being disrespectable to the other.
this guy is a whiny foul-mouthed biscuit-head psycho...who likes to assume these things were "refuted", with his circular reasoning and assumptions. And pathological BIASES. Wanting this junk to be true (to have an alibi for his psychosis and habits and idiocies...) so he'll just assume it all is. No... Darwinian hallucinations, force-fitting, straw-men, and laughable examples, and Atheist assumptions and wishful thinking and SPECULATIONS are what's "science fiction".
i dont have any problem with you and the fact that you are atheist and i'm not. But i hate that you attack other religions. If it doesnt concern you, why not leave it alone and live your own life? why do you go out to attack it? It doesnt hurt to be a christian. Why do you go at it like being christian will ruin the world. being an extremist christian or some idiot who disregards science, i understand disliking. but regular christians, what's so bad about that?
@dignifiedwhite He has made several videos against islam. You can find "The Case Against Islam" on TheAmazingTerroja channel. He has a video on this channel where he draws Muhammad ("Draw Muhammad Day? Neat!") and at least two additional videos against islam called "Islam: Stupid Beliefs" and "Islam Just Needs An iPod". He also has a video titled "Burning Everyone's Koran" where he burns the koran. Those are just the ones I can remember offhand.
For a while I wasn't quite sure,but now I know with certainty Atheism has become a religion. Seems there are more Atheistic evangelizers out there than anyone else.
@JesterAbu To display religious behaviour and attributes isn't exclusive to belief in God,check the definition. There are atheist movements,seminars,conventions,and evangelizers like amazingatheist here. The message is getting louder,more dogmatic and more intolerant daily.
@Copsweet At no point did I mention god in my comment. Also, that something got movements and seminars does not necessarily have anything to do with whether it's a religion or not. The only convention Atheism got is that it don't have any religious beliefs. And to evangelize means to give someone information about a belief that they do not have themselves. This is not what atheists do. They tell people about the absence of religious beliefs. Therefore it is not evangelizing.
The Nevada state driving handbook, including the covers is 63 pages long (22,514 words), with pictures, in large print, & written in such a way that an 8 year old can understand it. Take a trip to Vegas and watch the carnage! The bible is 788,280 words long, & written in what could be considered a different dialect of any current form of English. I wonder, if so many people fail so badly at reading the Nevada Driver Handbook, How are they supposed to correctly understand the Bible?
im not really an atheist. im more agnostic. As such i don't think should any kind of religious piece should be put in the fiction section, but it also should be put in the science section either. We need to respect each others beliefs to SOME point.
@shotgunn9 Do you believe in a god? Yes, or no? If no, but you are still not 100% sure, you are an agnostic atheist. Most atheist don't claim to be 100% sure that there is no god.
@shotgunn9 Well the thing is, are we going to put all the alien theories about how they came here built the pyramids and created us then left? I see what you mean but it really is kind of stupid that you have to accept something because it's popular and only then can stupid shit be seen as somewhat relevant.
@shotgunn9 It's okay to respect beliefs. I do respect that other people think differently than me, but the book doesn't belong in the science section because the statements in the book is not backed up by evidence and facts, like a good science book does. Christianity belongs in the religion section, science books belong in the science section. Easy as pie.
Wow, and you know this from reading it? You know it doesn't belong in the physics section by having read it? To be able to judge content before reviewing said content makes you a better man than I...
I laugh at these people. Evolution = quackery. No transition exists at all and no anthropologist will deny they have no transition, only transformation and Lucy is in Fact the same bone mass of a primate, in fact all so called Anthropological remains are Primates skeletons. Then we can talk about Fine Tuning. The universe is so fine tuned that it baffles mathematicians, including Hawking. Don't start me on the big bang because you have to admit Cause. DUDE Your the idiot here.
@NOISLAMINUSA It's thousands of times more likely that the universe itself has simply always been, than it is likely a 'god' designed it. The impossibility of non-existence as a consciously comprehensible state, makes a God illogical forthwith. Think of it this way... For a 'god' to have created everything, it would have had to have consciously existed, within the state of non-existence, which creates a paradox and, this is of course saying the former is possible,
@suckitfuckerIDC You have zero understanding of physics, or biology / anthropology. No there is nothing in nature to observe that supports Evolution and no evolutionists has ever provided the examples effectively. Whether you believe in God or not, is irrelevent to the facts. Evolution is a pathetic attempt to prove there is no God, but it is being proven wrong now and its time to face the facts. Not biased pseudo science.
@NOISLAMINUSA Fossils. Evolution is not AIMING to prove there is no god, merely explain very obvious and occurring changes in species of animals that CLEARLY exist. Pseudo science, is science that has no evidence towards it's findings, whereas evolution not only has visceral and physical evidence of it's correctness, but has visual evidence of it as well. You know who doesn't, and who makes no logical sense? God.
@NOISLAMINUSA Now did you respond thus because you honestly read all of my comments, and understand them entirely, or did you simply respond thus because you COULDN'T even READ my comments, and understood not even HALF of what I said? I believe it's safe to assume, the latter is indeed the correct choice in that scenario, and that you actually did not understand anything I said at all. Typical.
@NOISLAMINUSA I'm willing to bet, you're also quite right wing, and VERY much American. I have a little bit of news for you, no one has EVER accused America of being an intelligent nation. You have a 17% literacy rating. That means, only 17% of the population, living in your country, understand 2 thirds of the English language, and can read half of it. This combined with the startling theocratic regime exercises, carried out by your largely corrupt government,
@NOISLAMINUSA Let's face facts here. God, is a concept. He is a loosely drawn, vague, concept. He makes no logical sense, because in order for him to exist, an impossible set of circumstances, must have been not only met, but exceeded. Creationism is ALSO quite impossible, as yet ANOTHER set of criteria must be met, which are both impossible, and delusional. No understanding of physics or biology? I am in fact EXTREMELY well learned, in all both of those fields.
@NOISLAMINUSA What exactly happens, when you smash a watermelon with a mallet, and melt the pieces until they're a liquid, then boil them away? Do you think that by doing this, you've destroyed matter? Do you think you've expended matter? Hardly, You've merely converted a solid, into a liquid, then into a gas. There is an exact though ever growing as evidenced by the universe outward expansion, amount of matter and energy, in the universe at any one time.
@NOISLAMINUSA Neither of these things can be created or destroyed. Science, will tell you that, no matter which scientist you ask, since things like this, are COMMON KNOWLEDGE. Common knowledge seems to be something that is severely lacking in America. 63% of Americans may not accept evolution, and in an idiot dominated, theocracy as such, majority rules based on stigma, and the high possibility of people come to harm as a result of disbelief in the theocracy's panel of beliefs,
@NOISLAMINUSA However, just because a vast amount of people, believe something to be true, that in itself does not automatically make that the actual truth. I'm going in forgo Godwin's Law for a moment here, and reference Nazi Germany. Think of it this way, Nazi Germany, was a theocracy similar to America, save for instead of Christian idealism, it was dominated by both protestant Catholicism, as well as other beliefs regarding racial superiority,
@NOISLAMINUSA as well as the nigh universal belief, that Atlantis, was indeed the sunken continent, of the 'Aryan race' and that the 'perfect human being' or 'master race' had blonde hair and blue eyes, to the extent of actually dying both people's hair and irises, to match this specification. This is very similar to the way people behave in America today.
@NOISLAMINUSA If a person professes to a different belief system, there is a minority Americans, who will protest that, and express belief, that said person, should embrace THEIR beliefs, instead. This is known as, fundamentalism, and it is to be frowned upon, as it is one of the apex examples, with it's brothers Racism, and Homophobia. However, when one professes a disbelief in all religions, for want of actual evidence, which is in fact, sorely lacking...
@NOISLAMINUSA a majority suddenly becomes offended, at your choice to live a life unencumbered by a foolish idealism that a person, must live in constant servitude, to a cosmic being, which has no only no evidence towards it's existence, but fails to meet the criteria of it's own doctrine, and is in fact, both illogical and improbable. I doubt you can explain this, stigma that is held towards people of different or people lacking, the belief system ingrained into America's,
@NOISLAMINUSA hive mentality. This combined with the lack of ingenuity or forethought regarding oneself, and the automatic willingness to accept without question, opposed authority and along with it, it's theocratic belief system, is textbook characteristic of the successful pulling of the wool, over the eyes of the majority of Americans. I wonder what it's like to wake up every morning, and be so incomprehensibly wrong, on so many levels...
@NOISLAMINUSA it would have from there, have to have comprehended existence as a principal, having existed (or not existed) within a void surrounded by nothing, with no concept of time, space, emotion or even thought, at which point it is impossible for anything that has never known anything, literally, to comprehend let alone to ponder along the lines of cosmic existence, let very well alone comprehend being able to 'create' it.
@NOISLAMINUSA principle* At this point you can already tell how highly illogical it is for a god to have existed in the first place, let alone to have created anything, but here's some more food for though. Matter and energy, may not be created or destroyed, only divided, gathered, conducted or molded, with energy being exempt for the most part, from the last of those 4 possible actions. Regarding this principle alone, a god again, seems more impossible with every passing minute one ponders this
@NOISLAMINUSA The most hilarious thing about your statement in general has to be, that evolution has more evidence for it's correctness in said argument, than gravity does for it's existence. If you would, I would like you to jump. If indeed evolution is a 'foolish' and 'easily seen through' theory, much like this 'gravity' nonsense which originally Christianity thought to be non-existent, as well as thought the world to be flat, than you should float away instead of plummet to the ground.
@NOISLAMINUSA You could jump, and let's say for discussion's sake you do, and you and I both know what would happen/happened. You would/did plummet back to the ground, and landed/would have landed on your feet, travelling a short distance, but gaining no maintained altitude whatsoever. The same could be said for if you flew an airplane, into a billow of clouds, expecting 'god' to be waiting for you there. That's what Christians believed they would find originally, if they had succeeded in flight
@NOISLAMINUSA Simply because people cannot 'disprove' God, it does not mean he is a likely vector of origins, nor does it make him logical through the process of elimination. All it simply means is that though impossible and paradoxical, there is no possible way through which we can bring back proof of it's fictional nature. What if, for instance I told you, there was a magical kettle, Russel's kettle, and this kettle had the power to grant one man any wish he so desired
@NOISLAMINUSA and any woman, any two wishes she desired, with the exception that her second wish would need to be used to better another's life rather than her own, but that this possibly world changing artifact, orbiting the moon at a speed of 180,000,000 miles per hour, and was intangible, as well as completely invisible, and that though a fully formed, and majestic artifact, the kettle was around the size of your pinkie finger's nail?
@NOISLAMINUSA You'd likely respond with: 'Ha! Dude that's total bs! If you can't touch it, and you can't see, and there's no way for you to ever acquire it, how are you going to use it or prove that it's real?! It's total bs, you're full of shit who would believe that crock?' Why? Because it IS a total 'load'. It defies the laws of equivalent exchange that a physical universe is symmetrical and synergic because of, as well as breaking every law of physics at once, much like this 'god' person.
@NOISLAMINUSA The real question isn't ''how could this universe POSSIBLY be random?!?! Look at all the things that had to happen for life to form! Impossible! Poppycock! Fool!'' Well actually, that argument bears no merit when you use simple logic; Under what other circumstances would life form? It's been proven that life can form where there is very little air (Europa, one of Jupiter's moons) and water which doesn't abide by our characteristics of normal, liquid water.
If Christians had Goebbles for propaganda then at least it would contain coherent arguments... And Goebbles is dead
TalkableMuffin 1 week ago
If those books you showed on camera were from the book store, I do think people in my area will sure buy them. It will be a waste of time reading those books.
doctorofghetto2 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from TheAmazingAtheist
America has to be a really religion obsessed place. And if that's come from the mouth of a Italian (=Pope-land) it means something!
MacBamboocha 3 weeks ago
@MacBamboocha You have no idea. It's terrible here.
ragekage209 4 days ago
Why are creationists so obsessed with the bacteria flagellum?
MisterMcKinney 3 weeks ago
@MisterMcKinney Its because it was briefly a creature that caused concern for the theory of evolution. Briefly. It didn't seem to make sense, but now it does. Creationists can't get over this.
andromidius 1 week ago
@RickelodeonKritiken @tomaf I was kidding, for one, and for two, I used the wrong word. I know it is a bookstore, but I accidentally called it a library. No big deal.
WithASideOfFries 3 weeks ago
These books are exactly what stereotypes Christians.
SuperMutantSpaceCat 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ATHEISTS BURN IN HELL FOREVER !!!!
ATHEISTS BURN IN HELL FOREVER !!!!
ATHEISTS BURN IN HELL FOREVER !!!!
fuckmania07 3 weeks ago
Swearing in the library! How classy!
WithASideOfFries 4 weeks ago in playlist More videos from TheAmazingAtheist
@WithASideOfFries it's not a library, it's a bookstore. and his swearing is well deserved.
tomaf 4 weeks ago
@WithASideOfFries It's a bookstore, he said it. Not listening classy!
RickelodeonKritiken 3 weeks ago
i hope you moved them to the proper sections...:-)
Mistah00d 1 month ago
It's this the guy who stuffed bananas up his ass?
JuliusIsMe 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Atheists burn in hell forever !!!!
fuckmania07 1 month ago
hope you put them in the bin section
ahhninjadragon 1 month ago
@ahhninjadragon the trash bin section is best
tomaf 4 weeks ago
How long will the religion of evolutionism infiltrate science? The belief that populations of animals tha are clearly not [finches] (or pick any animal) can evolve over generations eventually into [finches].. Not observable, not able to be shown in a test case, not science.
Or what about the supernatural belief being called science that absolutely nothing can create everything?
Or what about the supernatural belief that all matter, energy and laws of nature just happen to be eternal.
ForumLight 1 month ago
@ForumLight Go pick up a book about evolution and or the big bang and you'll see that it's not unproven and not supernatural at all, though it does not exclude a supernatural creator. At least do so before making more straw men.
"/watch?v=uyCkADmNdNo&feature=relmful_video_title" this is a good basic video about how we know the big bang happened. If you have any interest in a debate then you can message me, it would be my delight even though I am not as educated on the subject as some others.
Lulzalutioners 1 month ago
Any Christian fundamentalist could walk through the science section & spout off ridiculous criticisms without actually having read the books. By the way, the bacterial flagellum has been rebutted, not refuted.
drinksmith87 1 month ago
@drinksmith87 The argument that the bacterial flagellum is irreducible is refuted it has been shown that a major part can be used to perform another function, & that its minor parts can be combined to perform other functions. Its only rebutted to those that cannot let go of yet another false argument, & some would probably go so far to say it hasn't even been rebutted.
robvlob 1 month ago
@robvlob Would you mind offering a book, a name, or other source of reference documenting the experiment that refutes the irreducibility of the bacterial flagellum? If I am to concede this point as a false argument, I would indeed like to know that it's truly false, and not merely because it's being asserted as false.
drinksmith87 1 month ago
@drinksmith87 /watch?v=0hW7ddJOWko Dr. Ken Miller a Christian Biologist demonstrates the IC argument to be false by breaking down the flagellum using a major part as a whole(10 of its 50) & explains its function.
robvlob 1 month ago
just to clarify--it was a Girl with a Banana...?
PropheticInfoWars 1 month ago
thats why i dont read books XD
johanlibert 1 month ago
@johanlibert what
ANONONTHEJEWTUBE 1 month ago
Which section of the bookstore did you find the banana you shoved up your ass?
insertclichename 1 month ago
@insertclichename Get over it already? I've done that too, not with a banana but fingers, and you know what? It feels good. Try it yourself.
InFlamesHeavier 1 month ago
@InFlamesHeavier I posted that comment with a finger up my ass. Your move.
insertclichename 1 month ago
Go put it in the fiction section!
Marazish 1 month ago
@AmazingAtheistst LOL NICE TROLL.
AChaosAddiction 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I was very wrong and blind. There really is a God. Atheists are amazing, yes. Amazingly blind. Thankyou, Jesus, you've saved me from Hell. I'm sorry for all the people that I helped send to Hell with my ignorance. :°(
AmazingAtheistst 1 month ago
@stonemetallica Why not? I hope everyone does that, and I hope they keep doing it. The only abuse here is by the Christians polluting the science section with this crap.
TWSceptic 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
whoever wrote that book has the right to do so, its not "propaganda", if you think its all bullshit why are you so afraid of it?
illboy6 1 month ago
@stonemetallica I hope he did. Thats where that bullshit belongs! ITS NOT SCIENCE LET ALONE PHYSICS!
kottonklown 1 month ago in playlist TJ
GO TO HELL U ATHIEST PEICE OF TRASH. I HOPE U ROT IN HELL BASTARD!!!!! the worlod is to unique to have been created by science. fuck scientific evolution and athiest scums like u. GAY PIECE OF SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jamrock391 1 month ago
@jamrock391 typical religious asshole doing anything they can to block all of the facts from entering their small brains in order to keep the beliefs that their parents raised you to believe. one thing that religious people dont understand is that every single creature is born atheist, not believing that a god created everything blah blah blah...
GumBreed 1 month ago
@jamrock391 Science did not create the world. science is the study and explanation of how the universe formed and the laws that govern how it works. not a mystical magical power.
kottonklown 1 month ago in playlist TJ
@jamrock391 Perfect example of an uneducated religious idiot. You don't even follow your own rules you fucking retard.
TWSceptic 1 month ago
@jamrock391 unique? how do you little insect in this great universe know? We are nothing. And even if you think so, nobody cares about us exept ourselfs.
The real "scum" on the face of the earth are not atheists nor religious people. The scum on the face of this planet are such hatefull people like you.
mip93 1 month ago
@mip93 Well put sir.
zimismyinvader 1 month ago
@jamrock391 How very christian of you! This is an example of why jesus crispies are villified and hated.
Tauron68 1 month ago
The book could have just been misplaced you worthless, pathetic fucking piece of degrading shit! The Amazing Atheist?.......more like TheAmazingDumbass! Might as well just rip off your own dick, burrow it out and smoke it.
leonidasoneoneseven 1 month ago
@leonidasoneoneseven Misplaced? Haha brainwashed idiot.
TWSceptic 1 month ago
I am not a fundamentalist Christian but I do not adhere to strict Darwinism. Science and Faith can easily coexist. Some of the most advanced scientific theories have been advocated by people of Faith. You confuse fundamentalist Faith with all of Christianity. The missing link has not been found, in fact recent scientific findings have supported "man" as we know him to be separate and distinct. Christians can believe in evolution but acknowledge God to be the "spark".
ScripsitVeritas 1 month ago
@ScripsitVeritas No you can't, the bible says that your god created everything exactly as is, so by believing in evolution you are basically saying the bible, "the all knowing world of god," is wrong.
5StarGeneralXenoCO 1 month ago
@5StarGeneralXenoCO Your theology is as a fundamentalist. The majority of Christianity is not fundamentalist. It is Catholic or Orthodox, the oldest Churches in Christendom. Our theology believes the Bible to be the inspired Word but is not a scientific or absolute historical document. The Old Testament uses stories to convey a point. In Genesis, no one can say a "day" is our day, since God has no time. The Creation story timeline can easily span millions of years in human time.
ScripsitVeritas 1 month ago
@5StarGeneralXenoCO not at all man, the bible as many other sacred texts are symbollical so a Christian or catholic believeing that evolution is plausible has no contradiction with his/her previous faith.
the only real illution is that science and religion can not share a goal or are two separate unmixable things. the all knowing God, may have created the world through evolution
Otokage216 1 month ago
Why do you think it important to dog Christians .Are you that starved for attention didnt mummie give you enough hugs ? Listen I dont believe science is hokum ,and I am a Christian .I believe God is the spark that started all of this ,including the big bang .There are mysteries on this planet the likes you or I have no comprehension of .To say we know it all is utter arrogance ,and something will come along to blow those theories completely out of the water .It happens constantly
truckdawg43 1 month ago
@TheRejectedXXX --y u mad tho?
KINGOFHELLANDYOU 1 month ago
Fat atheist piece of shit atheists suck dick and are huge nerds and dont get laid cuz there gay and always talk about science fuck you , 0:56
potato2442 2 months ago
@potato2442 I'm a female atheist,so yes I do suck dick,thank you for the compliment :3
BeatleFloydify 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
Exheretics1 2 months ago
If you like reading books,a good one on this topic is The Collapse of Evolution by Scott M. Huse. Another good book is Darwin’s Black Box by Michael J. Behe, a Professor of Biochemistry. There is one advantage to a book—you can carry it around more easily than your computer, and you do not need an Internet connection, either! Both of these books qualify as “best sellers.”
LaughingAtAtheists 2 months ago
What makes the flood important to our topic is all the evidence it left around. For one thing, pretty much everything that did not live in water would have been killed in a yearlong flood. This would have left an enormous layer of dead things that would later become coal and oil . . . and leave fossils. It is evident to everyone, as we view our dwindling energy resources, that a lot of material was left in the ground at one time
LaughingAtAtheists 2 months ago
@LaughingAtAtheists There is no evidence that the earth was ever covered in a world wide flood......none. The bible is nonsense.
000SMITH000 2 months ago
@000SMITH000 Actually I have seen theories stating that back when the earth was first formed, it was a molten piece of rock, which then cooled off, producing tons of rain. This is the theory as to where we get our oceans. After that, the world freezes and turns into a big ball of ice. So yes, the earth was at one point a "water world", but this was back in the Archaean era, and WAY before humans arrived.
AvalonDraconis 1 month ago
It is interesting that the formation of the earth proposed by noted astronomer (astrophysicist) Hugh Ross has the exact same order as the creation account given in Genesis chapter 1.
HANDLEtheHERETIC 2 months ago
@HANDLEtheHERETIC I'm not sure how "noted" Hugh Ross is, since he is basically a bible thumper in a white lab coat. Of course his findings agree with the nonsense in Genesis, he is a believer.
000SMITH000 2 months ago
How did humans (and everything else) come into existence? The only explanation you will find in public school and university textbooks is the theory of evolution. Yet, no scientific, provable evidence supporting the theory of evolution has emerged since Charles Darwin popularized it in 1859.
HANDLEtheHERETIC 2 months ago
@HANDLEtheHERETIC The theory of evolution has nothing to do with how humans came into existence. Also, since the theory of evolution was first proposed, there have been literally thousands of pieces of evidence supporting it's claims...including transitional fossils and DNA examples. If you get a chance, check out a website called Talk Origins Archive: Evolution. It's got a lot of good info on evolution.
000SMITH000 2 months ago
The Bible describes the suspension of the Earth in space.
Job 26:7 He stretches out the north over empty space; He hangs the earth on nothing.
Statements Consistent With Meteorology
AL33355 2 months ago
The Bible also says that each star is unique.
1 Corinthians 15:41 There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory.
All stars look alike to the naked eye.Even when seen through a telescope, they seem to be just points of light. However, analysis of their light spectra reveals that each is unique and different from all others.
AL33355 2 months ago
The Bible suggests the presence of nuclear processes like those we associate with nuclear weaponry. This is certainly not something that could have been explained in 67 AD using known scientific principles (when Peter wrote the following verse).
2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up.
AL33355 2 months ago
@XxIncarnationxX The Old Testament was written over a long period, beginning with Moses and finnished long before Christ. The New Testament was written shortly after Christ and preserved via Christians long before satan developed the Roman Catholic church. Since the Bible exposes the politicians in Rome, the vatican burned Bibles and the readers, and rewrote history so the gullible wouldn't know.
AtheistAnonymous73 2 months ago
Damn, we lost another one. }:-(
DEMONinHELL4 2 months ago
I was very wrong and blind. There really is a God. Atheists are amazing, yes. Amazingly blind. Thankyou, Jesus, you've saved me from Hell.
And thankyou LaughingAtAtheists, SMARTERthanATHEISTS,atheistRblind, and Al333555. John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
AmazingAtheistst 2 months ago
@AmazingAtheistst It's funny how people think the Christian bible was created during the life of Jesus, while it was actually created by Constantine and some Bishops in around 800 to 900 AD.
Other than that, they were stories passed down from generation to generation for about 900 years.
XxIncarnationxX 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ATHEISTS HAVE NO EXCUSE Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
AtheistREFUTED 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD SAYS AVOID ATHEISTS
2Tim 2:16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness
SMARTERthanATHEISTS 2 months ago
"I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty" Rev. 1:8.
AL33355 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey, I hate to be the one to break it to y'all; but, you know that cartoon they showed you in school where man is supposedly evolving and your great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great,...grandpa was a monkey? It's not true. It's a disproven myth. They made it up. It's just a cartoon.
atheistRblind 2 months ago
Hey, I hate to be the one to break it to y'all; but, you know that cartoon they showed you in school where man is supposedly evolving and your great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great,...grandpa was a monkey? It's not true. It's a disproven myth. They made it up. It's just a cartoon.
LaughingAtAtheists 2 months ago
Comment removed
XxIncarnationxX 2 months ago
We encourage dim wits to believe in atheism. Ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
And it IS religion. When you get here, you'll see why. Ha! Ha! Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
DEMONinHELL2 2 months ago
amazing strawman inc.
atheistRblind 2 months ago
@ToastPieChickenCake sop nonsense. how could God NOT be self-existent? Remember, he made time also.
HANDLEtheHERETIC 2 months ago
Isa 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! 5:21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight! Jer 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
HANDLEtheHERETIC 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned ALREADY because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
HelpForHeretic
@amazinglionman but I'm not one going to hell.
HANDLEtheHERETIC 2 months ago
@chrisxy The advancement of music, science,art, freedom, knowledge, etc. skyrocketed AFTER the Bible was put into English because it gave man faith that the universe was orderly.
Helpforheretics 2 months ago
@Helpforheretics doesn't make the bible true.
Pittsisamazing 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Helpforheretics Correlation does not imply causation.
NeverDead94 2 months ago
@Helpforheretics You're a dumbass
Amazinglionman 2 months ago
@Helpforheretics Yeah, the bible gave people music. However scientist invented instruments.
Also if god created the world, who created god? Most people say that "Nothing created everything" Can't be real, so that means god must be real. That doesn't make sense. How was god created? That stupid theory contradicts with itself. Also helpforheretics. Go help yourself. Its more evil to try to convert people.
ToastPieChickenCake 2 months ago
Christians should be barred from using anything developed by science.
pcvideogamer 2 months ago
@TheShadowTreasurer The prophets made enouph predictions about the first coming of Christ that it is mathematically impossible that they weren't inspired, and this is taking into consideration just a fraction of the fulfilled events. And we aren't talking a about the Jean Dixon-Nostradamus school of junk "prophecy" either. The odds have been worked out to 10 to the 257th power, which is such a astronomically large number that there aren't that many electrons in the known universe.
Helpforheretics 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ItheSwick You are full of bluff. You know that you don't know what you are talking about. I know that you don't know what you are talking about. And you know that I know that you don't know what you are talking about.
AL33355 2 months ago
@ItheSwick The Bible is always way ahead of science. The "science" you are thinking a about is "science falsely so called" . When every body thought the earth was flat, the Bible said it was round. When millions were dying of the black plague, the jews survived by following Old Testament sanitation laws. Fast transportation was foretold. When the political scientists said that the Jews could never return to Isreal, they did anyways. It goes much deeper ...You do know they found Noah's ark?
AL33355 2 months ago
@AL33355
And I heard the christians were the first to walk on the moon after building their space ship without science...
chrisxy123 2 months ago
@rnalithe00 Besides the hypocrisy and ignorance, you might not be so bad. Creationists don't believe things just popped into existence-hence, this is why they are Creationists. God didn't pop into existence, either. He's always existed-that's why He's God, and you're not.
AL33355 2 months ago
@rnalithe00 I haven't seen any self-exsisting computers. But, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Dell found a stash of them buried next to Lucy (a 3' tall chimpanzee), Heidelburg Man (built from a human jawbone), Nebraska Man (built from the tooth of an extinct pig), Piltdown Man (built from the jaw of a modern ape), Neanderthal Man (proven to be a man with arthritis), Cro-Magnon Man (equal in physique and brain capacity as modern man, so what's the difference?).
AL33355 2 months ago
@EspressoFan4Life what you say is probably true.
kagairu 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Many Christians want to believe so badly they will ignore scientific evidence, reason, common sense and their own better judgment. Religions have perverted the meaning of the word "truth." The Websters Dictionary definition says what the word means: truth: "being in accord with fact or reality" - Search for "Church of Innerspace" in Google and read what it says. It is not what you think it is.
vividDC 2 months ago
Could we classify every OTHER as "Atheist" propaganda? Neither one of them is a known fact, it's just a matter of opinion. We can't prove creation OR evolution as fact. But there will always be prayer before important government meetings, there will always be "In God we trust" on our currency, God will always be in the final verse of the national anthem, and "CREATED equal" will always be in the constitution. If I can tolerate it, so can you. And being atheist doesn't make you smart.
ItheSwick 2 months ago
@ItheSwick "We can't prove creation OR evolution as fact." Get your science straight and then you could maybe talk with some authority. Of course, most creationists aren't interested in doing so because it blows up their fairitale. I couldn't care less about currency and other formalisms because they're just that, anachronic formalisms, anyone with half a brain knows that. And being theist doesen't make you better. In any sense whatsoever.
Nemomain 2 months ago
@ItheSwick Oooohhhh now I get it... The proof of God is on the American dollar... I must revise my life.
bobivd6688 2 months ago
@ItheSwick So science is now "atheist propaganda"? Don't know why I'm surprised to hear you say this. Christians are anti-science, after all.
rnalithe00 2 months ago
@ItheSwick
"Could we classify every OTHER as "Atheist" propaganda?"
Not unless the books tell you that there is no god. Unless there it is suggested in phyiscs.
The concept is easy: These books are about science, especially about physics. They are not supposed to talk about god or a lack of god unless there is a reason to do so in phyisics.
"Neither one of them is a known fact, it's just a matter of opinion."
Well, ultimately yes, but at least science works as shows your comuter for example.
chrisxy123 2 months ago
@TheRejectedXXX
666 kill jesus
bakersk8r41 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If someone told you that your computer self-exisisted without anyone ever designing it, I hope you would say they were nuts.
How long would it take for a jet fighter to form itself by chance, say in the ground, without a designer? A million years? A billion years? A million billion years? It'll NEVER happen. Man is designed infinitely more complicated, yet you want me to believe it was by chance? Are you crazy?
cultrefuter32 2 months ago
@cultrefuter32 Okay, let me see if I get this straight:
You're saying a complex thing like a computer can't self-exist, but a super-complex deity can?
If you want to prove to us that you're enlightened, perhaps you should not only find out what your opponent's position is, but also what yours is. Nobody except creationists claim/believe complex things just pop out of nowhere from nothing.
rnalithe00 2 months ago
@TheRejectedXXX cry harder gullible child,
itchygonads 2 months ago
This is sickening.... very valid points mr.athiest.
Qphlat 2 months ago
LOL It aint SciFi neither, SciFi is based in a possibility based in factual reality about human development. I guess it belongs where they put Mythology.
ErikRicardoLC 2 months ago
@TheRejectedXXX yep. he mad
KINGOFHELLANDYOU 2 months ago
@TheRejectedXXX u mad?
KINGOFHELLANDYOU 2 months ago
*disrespectful
kagairu 2 months ago
Sorry iPad mulfunction... Living in a non-Christian country I wouldn't know how it feels to live among a lot of people who take the bible as fact.
kagairu 2 months ago
But living in a country where c
kagairu 2 months ago
Even though I'm an atheist myself, I find him to be irritatingly snobbish in this video.
kagairu 2 months ago
@kagairu How so? I'm just curious. Intelligent design is not science, and therefore doesn't belong in the science section. Anyone who is at all educated in science would agree. Seems completely reasonable to me.
God CANNOT be scientific, because God is an unfalsifiable hypothesis. In order for even a hypothesis to be scientific, it must be FALSIFIABLE, through experimental tests. Some bullshit like "The Design of Life" shouldn't be in the science section of the bookstore.
TheMosesProductions 2 months ago
@TheMosesProductions yeah I agree with his view, not refuting that, just didn't like the way he was delivering it. there are ways to make a point being without being disrespectable to the other.
kagairu 2 months ago
I'm an agnostic and the Amazing atheist is so annoying to me.
Nashhinton 2 months ago
@Nashhinton You can stop that by not watching his videos.
LetsGetHighOnMorris 2 months ago
this guy is a whiny foul-mouthed biscuit-head psycho...who likes to assume these things were "refuted", with his circular reasoning and assumptions. And pathological BIASES. Wanting this junk to be true (to have an alibi for his psychosis and habits and idiocies...) so he'll just assume it all is. No... Darwinian hallucinations, force-fitting, straw-men, and laughable examples, and Atheist assumptions and wishful thinking and SPECULATIONS are what's "science fiction".
sweetmikser 2 months ago
@sweetmikser so an invisible, all powerful, entity with no actual proof that it exists is not fiction?
G40rc3 2 months ago
@G40rc3 It's better than the Theory of 0+0=1
Honorfull 2 months ago
@Honorfull that s because there are no real fanatics spreading it
G40rc3 2 months ago
The F*** word is the Atheists chant.
DarriusisGr8 2 months ago
@DarriusisGr8 And "God Hates Fags" is the theist's. Which one's worse? (There IS a right answer and a wrong answer)
rnalithe00 2 months ago
who cares...
JoeCool101 2 months ago
i dont have any problem with you and the fact that you are atheist and i'm not. But i hate that you attack other religions. If it doesnt concern you, why not leave it alone and live your own life? why do you go out to attack it? It doesnt hurt to be a christian. Why do you go at it like being christian will ruin the world. being an extremist christian or some idiot who disregards science, i understand disliking. but regular christians, what's so bad about that?
iamjordandavoll 3 months ago
I must have missed your video having a go at the religion of Islam. Pity that, since Christianity is a bit of a soft target, isn't it.
dignifiedwhite 3 months ago
@dignifiedwhite He has made several videos against islam. You can find "The Case Against Islam" on TheAmazingTerroja channel. He has a video on this channel where he draws Muhammad ("Draw Muhammad Day? Neat!") and at least two additional videos against islam called "Islam: Stupid Beliefs" and "Islam Just Needs An iPod". He also has a video titled "Burning Everyone's Koran" where he burns the koran. Those are just the ones I can remember offhand.
interstellarsea 2 months ago
0:35 TITTIE ASS ASS
cedebukvar 3 months ago
For a while I wasn't quite sure,but now I know with certainty Atheism has become a religion. Seems there are more Atheistic evangelizers out there than anyone else.
Copsweet 3 months ago
@Copsweet How can Atheism be a religion when it's the absence of a religious beliefs?
JesterAbu 3 months ago
@JesterAbu To display religious behaviour and attributes isn't exclusive to belief in God,check the definition. There are atheist movements,seminars,conventions,and evangelizers like amazingatheist here. The message is getting louder,more dogmatic and more intolerant daily.
Copsweet 2 months ago
@Copsweet At no point did I mention god in my comment. Also, that something got movements and seminars does not necessarily have anything to do with whether it's a religion or not. The only convention Atheism got is that it don't have any religious beliefs. And to evangelize means to give someone information about a belief that they do not have themselves. This is not what atheists do. They tell people about the absence of religious beliefs. Therefore it is not evangelizing.
JesterAbu 2 months ago
@JesterAbu Fair enough,you didn't mention God. All I'll say is,if you look like a duck,walk like a duck,quack like a duck,your'e probably a duck.
Copsweet 2 months ago
The Nevada state driving handbook, including the covers is 63 pages long (22,514 words), with pictures, in large print, & written in such a way that an 8 year old can understand it. Take a trip to Vegas and watch the carnage! The bible is 788,280 words long, & written in what could be considered a different dialect of any current form of English. I wonder, if so many people fail so badly at reading the Nevada Driver Handbook, How are they supposed to correctly understand the Bible?
ninjabob52 3 months ago
im not really an atheist. im more agnostic. As such i don't think should any kind of religious piece should be put in the fiction section, but it also should be put in the science section either. We need to respect each others beliefs to SOME point.
shotgunn9 3 months ago
@shotgunn9 Do you believe in a god? Yes, or no? If no, but you are still not 100% sure, you are an agnostic atheist. Most atheist don't claim to be 100% sure that there is no god.
UnchainTheNight1 3 months ago
@shotgunn9 Well the thing is, are we going to put all the alien theories about how they came here built the pyramids and created us then left? I see what you mean but it really is kind of stupid that you have to accept something because it's popular and only then can stupid shit be seen as somewhat relevant.
musicplayah 3 months ago
@shotgunn9 It's okay to respect beliefs. I do respect that other people think differently than me, but the book doesn't belong in the science section because the statements in the book is not backed up by evidence and facts, like a good science book does. Christianity belongs in the religion section, science books belong in the science section. Easy as pie.
DonQuixotec 3 months ago
@DonQuixotec thats what i meant to say but mistyped =)
shotgunn9 3 months ago
Comment removed
superfish0012 3 months ago
I bet it was acquired to the store's selection by some herp derp employee with no idea of physics or any other science.
Cyberspine 3 months ago
Seriously, if I found that I would go right to the desk clerk and tell them to move it.
mymom48 3 months ago
I got kicked out of Barnes and Noble the other day for putting all the bibles in the fiction section...
just kidding, that didn't actually happen to, it's just an atheist joke.
maddoxmudd 3 months ago
@maddoxmudd shut up
zackspires 3 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAmazingAtheist
looked good with longer hair
LuekalanunFerdalan 3 months ago
But no, your not an obvious slave to your ideology like those Christians...
nicodemous52 3 months ago
Wow, and you know this from reading it? You know it doesn't belong in the physics section by having read it? To be able to judge content before reviewing said content makes you a better man than I...
nicodemous52 3 months ago
Comment removed
mnol99 3 months ago
evlution does not exst elution sicenfanitine elttuion is fake but god is real
yugioh5222 3 months ago
@yugioh5222 I think you spelled English wrong.
mnol99 3 months ago
@yugioh5222 Come back and comment when you can: 1. Construct a sentence properly. 2. Comprehend the language you are speaking.
Chris73194 3 months ago
I laugh at these people. Evolution = quackery. No transition exists at all and no anthropologist will deny they have no transition, only transformation and Lucy is in Fact the same bone mass of a primate, in fact all so called Anthropological remains are Primates skeletons. Then we can talk about Fine Tuning. The universe is so fine tuned that it baffles mathematicians, including Hawking. Don't start me on the big bang because you have to admit Cause. DUDE Your the idiot here.
NOISLAMINUSA 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA *You're
Anonpeace 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA It's thousands of times more likely that the universe itself has simply always been, than it is likely a 'god' designed it. The impossibility of non-existence as a consciously comprehensible state, makes a God illogical forthwith. Think of it this way... For a 'god' to have created everything, it would have had to have consciously existed, within the state of non-existence, which creates a paradox and, this is of course saying the former is possible,
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@suckitfuckerIDC You have zero understanding of physics, or biology / anthropology. No there is nothing in nature to observe that supports Evolution and no evolutionists has ever provided the examples effectively. Whether you believe in God or not, is irrelevent to the facts. Evolution is a pathetic attempt to prove there is no God, but it is being proven wrong now and its time to face the facts. Not biased pseudo science.
NOISLAMINUSA 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA Fossils. Evolution is not AIMING to prove there is no god, merely explain very obvious and occurring changes in species of animals that CLEARLY exist. Pseudo science, is science that has no evidence towards it's findings, whereas evolution not only has visceral and physical evidence of it's correctness, but has visual evidence of it as well. You know who doesn't, and who makes no logical sense? God.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA Now did you respond thus because you honestly read all of my comments, and understand them entirely, or did you simply respond thus because you COULDN'T even READ my comments, and understood not even HALF of what I said? I believe it's safe to assume, the latter is indeed the correct choice in that scenario, and that you actually did not understand anything I said at all. Typical.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA I'm willing to bet, you're also quite right wing, and VERY much American. I have a little bit of news for you, no one has EVER accused America of being an intelligent nation. You have a 17% literacy rating. That means, only 17% of the population, living in your country, understand 2 thirds of the English language, and can read half of it. This combined with the startling theocratic regime exercises, carried out by your largely corrupt government,
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA Let's face facts here. God, is a concept. He is a loosely drawn, vague, concept. He makes no logical sense, because in order for him to exist, an impossible set of circumstances, must have been not only met, but exceeded. Creationism is ALSO quite impossible, as yet ANOTHER set of criteria must be met, which are both impossible, and delusional. No understanding of physics or biology? I am in fact EXTREMELY well learned, in all both of those fields.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA What exactly happens, when you smash a watermelon with a mallet, and melt the pieces until they're a liquid, then boil them away? Do you think that by doing this, you've destroyed matter? Do you think you've expended matter? Hardly, You've merely converted a solid, into a liquid, then into a gas. There is an exact though ever growing as evidenced by the universe outward expansion, amount of matter and energy, in the universe at any one time.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA Neither of these things can be created or destroyed. Science, will tell you that, no matter which scientist you ask, since things like this, are COMMON KNOWLEDGE. Common knowledge seems to be something that is severely lacking in America. 63% of Americans may not accept evolution, and in an idiot dominated, theocracy as such, majority rules based on stigma, and the high possibility of people come to harm as a result of disbelief in the theocracy's panel of beliefs,
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA However, just because a vast amount of people, believe something to be true, that in itself does not automatically make that the actual truth. I'm going in forgo Godwin's Law for a moment here, and reference Nazi Germany. Think of it this way, Nazi Germany, was a theocracy similar to America, save for instead of Christian idealism, it was dominated by both protestant Catholicism, as well as other beliefs regarding racial superiority,
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA as well as the nigh universal belief, that Atlantis, was indeed the sunken continent, of the 'Aryan race' and that the 'perfect human being' or 'master race' had blonde hair and blue eyes, to the extent of actually dying both people's hair and irises, to match this specification. This is very similar to the way people behave in America today.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA If a person professes to a different belief system, there is a minority Americans, who will protest that, and express belief, that said person, should embrace THEIR beliefs, instead. This is known as, fundamentalism, and it is to be frowned upon, as it is one of the apex examples, with it's brothers Racism, and Homophobia. However, when one professes a disbelief in all religions, for want of actual evidence, which is in fact, sorely lacking...
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA a majority suddenly becomes offended, at your choice to live a life unencumbered by a foolish idealism that a person, must live in constant servitude, to a cosmic being, which has no only no evidence towards it's existence, but fails to meet the criteria of it's own doctrine, and is in fact, both illogical and improbable. I doubt you can explain this, stigma that is held towards people of different or people lacking, the belief system ingrained into America's,
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA hive mentality. This combined with the lack of ingenuity or forethought regarding oneself, and the automatic willingness to accept without question, opposed authority and along with it, it's theocratic belief system, is textbook characteristic of the successful pulling of the wool, over the eyes of the majority of Americans. I wonder what it's like to wake up every morning, and be so incomprehensibly wrong, on so many levels...
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA it would have from there, have to have comprehended existence as a principal, having existed (or not existed) within a void surrounded by nothing, with no concept of time, space, emotion or even thought, at which point it is impossible for anything that has never known anything, literally, to comprehend let alone to ponder along the lines of cosmic existence, let very well alone comprehend being able to 'create' it.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA principle* At this point you can already tell how highly illogical it is for a god to have existed in the first place, let alone to have created anything, but here's some more food for though. Matter and energy, may not be created or destroyed, only divided, gathered, conducted or molded, with energy being exempt for the most part, from the last of those 4 possible actions. Regarding this principle alone, a god again, seems more impossible with every passing minute one ponders this
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA The most hilarious thing about your statement in general has to be, that evolution has more evidence for it's correctness in said argument, than gravity does for it's existence. If you would, I would like you to jump. If indeed evolution is a 'foolish' and 'easily seen through' theory, much like this 'gravity' nonsense which originally Christianity thought to be non-existent, as well as thought the world to be flat, than you should float away instead of plummet to the ground.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA You could jump, and let's say for discussion's sake you do, and you and I both know what would happen/happened. You would/did plummet back to the ground, and landed/would have landed on your feet, travelling a short distance, but gaining no maintained altitude whatsoever. The same could be said for if you flew an airplane, into a billow of clouds, expecting 'god' to be waiting for you there. That's what Christians believed they would find originally, if they had succeeded in flight
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA Simply because people cannot 'disprove' God, it does not mean he is a likely vector of origins, nor does it make him logical through the process of elimination. All it simply means is that though impossible and paradoxical, there is no possible way through which we can bring back proof of it's fictional nature. What if, for instance I told you, there was a magical kettle, Russel's kettle, and this kettle had the power to grant one man any wish he so desired
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA and any woman, any two wishes she desired, with the exception that her second wish would need to be used to better another's life rather than her own, but that this possibly world changing artifact, orbiting the moon at a speed of 180,000,000 miles per hour, and was intangible, as well as completely invisible, and that though a fully formed, and majestic artifact, the kettle was around the size of your pinkie finger's nail?
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA You'd likely respond with: 'Ha! Dude that's total bs! If you can't touch it, and you can't see, and there's no way for you to ever acquire it, how are you going to use it or prove that it's real?! It's total bs, you're full of shit who would believe that crock?' Why? Because it IS a total 'load'. It defies the laws of equivalent exchange that a physical universe is symmetrical and synergic because of, as well as breaking every law of physics at once, much like this 'god' person.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago
@NOISLAMINUSA The real question isn't ''how could this universe POSSIBLY be random?!?! Look at all the things that had to happen for life to form! Impossible! Poppycock! Fool!'' Well actually, that argument bears no merit when you use simple logic; Under what other circumstances would life form? It's been proven that life can form where there is very little air (Europa, one of Jupiter's moons) and water which doesn't abide by our characteristics of normal, liquid water.
suckitfuckerIDC 3 months ago