Jews, the most dangerous people in the world they are adept at setting fire between peoples and countries like the publication of discord and strife is worse than murder
Jews betrayed Japanese by cooperating Chinese and Koreans for anti-Japan propaganda. In addition, racism is wrong of course but Jews surely deserved to be discriminated in Germany for what they did to Germans. Yet, Nazi didn't try to exterminate Jews in concentration camps at all. Google "Holocaust denier". Think why Jews prohibited Allies' bombing on railways to concentration camps.
omfg lithuanians saved like thousands of jews by risking their lives yet nobody ever appreciates that for fuck sake jew themselves don't like us i mean WTF ?
China should show us conclusive evidence about the massacre. Chinese government says 300,000 civilians were killed by the Japanese. However, the Nanking population was 250,000 before Japanese soldiers came. Moreover, the number of the population increased to 270,000 in Feb, 1938. How can you explain about this fact? China fabricated at least 143 pictures of the atrocity, and it paid money to foreigners to write books and news articles over the massacre rumor. Liar China!
so good to hear that he helped people i wold of got so many Jewish people to help write this documents and get through all of them.R.I.P for the japan guy
Kiichiro Higuchi (1888 - 1970), the Imperial Japanese Army Officer.
As a major general and the commander of the Harbin Special Branch in 1938, he allowed some 20,000 Jewish refugees who had fled Nazi Germany to cross the border from the Soviet Union to Manchukuo.
A few of his subordinates, were responsible for feeding the refugees, settling them in Harbin or Shanghai, or arranging for exit visas. 80% of those refugees entered to USA via Shanghai.
But Foreign minister Nazi German von Ribbentrop sent his letter to Japanese government via Ambassador Eugen Ott, and protested about Higuchi's decision.
Higuchi's superior oficer, Hideki Tojo, Chief of Staff of the Kwangtong Army (IJA troops stationed in Manchukuo) called Higuchi to his office and asked. Higuchi told that "It was an act of humanity. I have respect for alliance, but Japan is not a vassal country of Germany."
Tojo agreed that, and supported Higuchi's decision.
This case both proves the mass emergency emigration of Polish Jews abroad even after 1st Sept., 1939. It also disproves the WW2 U.S. propaganda of Japanese being "unhuman insects" which still continues in many Hollywood nonsense. The introduction about the Soviet Union being "anti-Jewish" is nonsense; the Soviets evacuated between 1.5 and 2.5 million Jews from eastern Poland and Ukraine before the 1941 invasion of the Nazis. We all like Japan. The atomic bombings of August 1945 were war crimes.
@IustitiaPax - Interesting documentary, but if you are talking about "proving", the only thing it proves is that all the generalizations about ANY nation are wrong. Unfortunately many attrocies committed by the Japanese during WW2 were not "Hollywood nonsense". They are quite well documented. As I said - nations are neither good or bad. We can only talk about individuals who are good (as in this case) or bad. We cen also talk about the policy of the government, but not about the nation.
@OlenkaWagner - Soviet Union became anti-semitic after WW2 (during Israeli-Palestinian crisis). Before that it was not the case, although there were some streaks of antisemitism before that as well (in Russia antisemitism was quite strong).
@OlenkaWagner The Soviet Union was never antisemitic. Not even after 1948. In 1948 the USSR supplied the Israeli Army and Irgun with Czechoslovak weapons. It only changed after Golda Meir's Moscow speech. It was anti-Zionism, not racial antisemitism at all. Pre-1917 Russian antisemitism was based on religious conflicts and on Jewish marxism.
@IustitiaPax - OK, not racially-based, but culturally and religiously-based. If you narrow down the definition of antisemitism to racially-based issue, I agree - there was no antisemitism. It was anti-Zionism and anti-Iudaism - this time it could have been Marxism against any religion, including Iudaism.
@OlenkaWagner Many crimes of the Japanese were deliberately exaggerated or invented by U.S. propaganda. But of course I know the Japanese were ruthless powerful imperialists and merciless in their internment camps and against resistance. But the Japanese were more civilized than e.g. Mao's Chinese Communists. And more human than U.S. Army bombing in Laos War after 1955. (I am not anti-American though, not at all!) The Japanese Empire was imperialist, but demonized in Western propaganda.
@OlenkaWagner I had relatives in Japanese camps in Dutch East Indies (Indonesia now). It was harsh: many dead, starvation, dehydration, cholera. And forced prostitution too. But no 100,000+ massacres like the 1945 American bombing of Tokyo civil residential areas with fire bombs. Nor comparable to the Nagasaki atomic massacre of civilians.
@IustitiaPax - I think the woerst crimes of the Japanese were the crimes against POWs. They did not even pretend to respect the Geneva Convention in this issue. The treatment of civillian internees was better than the treatment of POWs. Of course you can always argue what is worse: bombing civilians or allowing slow death due to inhumane treatment? This is a philosophical question. Another thing is that Japanese actually never apologized for the crimes (unlike Germans).
@OlenkaWagner The Japanese abused their POWs for forced labour under horrible circumstances. I wholly agree with you. But do you remember Ike Eisenhower's "Disarmed Enemy Forces" camps (death camps) to starve German POWs in 1945? Or the Soviet GULAGs for POWs from 1945-1955. In them, only 6 % of taken German POWs survived and could return thanks to Adenauer in 1955. And in 1921 the Polish Army also starved Soviet POWs in POW camps. I hope in future all states will respect the Geneva Convention!
@IustitiaPax - I've never said that the Japanese were the ONLY or even the WORST in their treatment of POWs. I think a good (although not only) indicator about the treatment could be the percentage of POWs who survived. In case of Soviet Union it was the lowest in fact, but in case of Japan it was also low. In case of the Western Allies the percentage was much higher ("Disarmed Enemy Forces" camps increased this percentage, but overall it remained much lower than is other cases).
@OlenkaWagner. Yes, in case of Japan it was also low. Due to tropical diseases and food scarcity, as well as forced labour the death rate was high. But the Soviets deliberately pursued killing of German POWs by death labour. The Allied POWs inside the Japanese islands had high survival rates. In case of the western Allies it was higher only after the Eisenhower camps. But even De Gaulle and French POW camps for German soldiers used forced labour and enslaved German boys of 16 year old until 1948
@OlenkaWagner I am glad you are fair. As for the western Allies: the fate of their POWs was never of interest to any Hollywood movies or any state-financed historians. Not even suitable for Soviet propaganda, as it would prove Soviet hypocrisy and blame the Allied Soviet "War against Fascism" alliance. The German POWs (or "Disarmed Enemy Forces") were given the worst treatment of all, after pro-Axis Ukrainian, Belarussian, RUssian and Latvian volunteers against Stalin.
@OlenkaWagner The Japanese Empire unlike the German Empire, was merely US-occupied and reformed, but the head of state of Japan, Hirohito, remained in power. And the Japanese were not subjected to Mass Psychological Warfare and Allied Re-Education and PSYOP (compare Smith-Mundelein Act) like the German people were from 1945 until 2011 (or 1991). I know about Japanese crimes of course. But why can other war criminals go around as "heroes"? This is a sad truth of human viciousness.
An act of kindness by one Japanese man that shall forever bind the friendship between Japan and Israel.A victory without war,he won friendship with the Israelis without firing a bullet,he saved them instead.Victory without war,he conquered the heart of the jews and the world,we thank him for it too....his name forever glorified,he died a hero to Japan,to Israel and to whole humanity.The Japanese ought to be proud,very proud of their son.God bless SUGIHARA.
Occupation and deprivation of basic human rights are examples of the ongoing crimes that Israel is committing against the indigenous Palestinian population now.
CCP brainwashed it's own people by teaching Anti -Japanese education
presenting it's people bunch of fabricated fake photos of massacres, to make them believe and force it's people to deal with it's low wage labor system.
That is how Japan apologized and to many countries in Asia only not to China.
WAKE UP Chinese people, are you still going to get enough being a slave of a communist group like CCP?
Why sint this mentioned in history books? Why arnt those brave people who risked so much in orde to help tjeir fellow man written about in every damn history book? These people inspire me to do good.
@SamuelThomasRanger I Japan have won the war, he should be considered a traitor.
Most of japanese people were brainwashed by the nationalism and the loyalty to the emperor at the time. Saving jews was an individual action and it's not part of Japan History, but of an individual wich made the difference in the History. He deserves a place in the Word History, not the japanese history books and their lies.
What a sad story. The strange part is that the Japanese had their own genocide in China and it some cases it was much worse but not as many people were killed.... at least during the WW2 time frame. Their are good and bad people everywhere you go and here is a prime example of a good person that was part of a bad regime.
@flatblackstrat are you counting with the percentage? the total number of genocide by japannese would be 12 million chinese by R. J. Rummel. And yes ur right, there are good people everywhere. But not as many 'good' japanese you could find in china during ww2...
@misshsyuha What percentage? No sorry but 12 million were not killed as part of genocide in the WW2 time frame and 12 million were not killed in Nan-king The population back then wasn't even 12 million I think. But Japan had invaded china and korea way before that so the actual number is still unknown. But if you included military deaths and everything all together I'm sure that number is possible.
@flatblackstrat: the sad thing is you only know Nan-Jing. What about the people who were killed under the policy of “burn all,kill all, loot all”...? I don't think that can be counted as military deaths...it makes little sense for us to discuss this topic here...nothing will change... the death never revive..
Those Nazis thought they had e/thing tied up, but they didn't count on men like this.
Hard to watch this without feeling anger, then humility. Jews probably left Japan after the war anyway? And this is the story of one man, not 'the Japanese'.
@goe5 For sure, but a lot of the good ones weren't in a position to help. My statement meant that a whole nation can't be held responsible for a few evil men. I'm in agreeance with you.
@moyadapne Not only one man but Japanese govt was totally against Nazism and racism even though Japan allied Germany. General Higuchi saved Jewish refugees' lives in Otpor(1938). Baron Makino submitted Racial Equality Proposal for the first time in the world(1919). JFYI.
And whoso seeketh as religion other than the Surrender (to Allah) it will not be accepted from him, and he will be a loser in the Hereafter.
86
How shall Allah guide a people who disbelieved after their belief and (after) they bore witness that the messenger is true and after clear proofs (of Allah's sovereignty) had come unto them. And Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk.
There are also news that during WW2, Japan rescued the UK ship while giving them food and shelter and returned them back to their country. This story was told by a retired UK marine. However, China and Korea is still busy promoting hate towards Japan so the government can use it as a camouflage to so the citizens would look the other way while they're doing something. What they don't teach is Japan was the one that westernized them.
You're either ignorant or lying - More than half of those British marines 'rescued' by the Japanese DID NOT return home, they actually died in captivity.
@purity5555 Then what was that interview with the real retired UK marine talking about that on youtube? That video even had real black and white photos of the UK marines returning safely from the Japanese ship. Now for most cases, I obviously know that UK and Japan showed no mercy to each other. Being tortured for interrogation, killed without mercy, etc. Both sides did this to each other. Since when did I ever say that the "entire" Japanese marines didn't kill any of their hostages?
But your previous post was obviously misleading. You said "returned them back to their country". The truth is: more than half of "them" would never see their country again.
If you said "returned LESS THAN HALF OF THEM back to their country then I would understand.
@purity5555 I agree that it was misleading. I wasn't talking about every UK ship that was seeking help but one UK ship which was sunk by the attack of Japanese air force which this one Japanese ship rescued. The UK crew member in that ship were all returned safely back to their country. As for all the Japanese rescue boats or crews that survived at sea, it's said that all of them died when they were found by their enemies.
Don't you think the US saved A LOT more lives ( Japanese and American) by dropping the A-bombs comparing to what the Japanese boats did? - At least 10 milions of Japanese lives were saved. And what about those US marines who gave their lives for the liberation of Japan? - Do they deserve your sympathy at all ?
@purity5555 The US came over to Japan and killed mostly civilians and a lot more CITIZENS died when US dropped the A-bomb right in the middle of where people lives. Before giving the chance of surrender with the first bomb, US immediately dropped the second bomb mainly as a test. US bombed Bikini Island for the same reason(test).
Ever heard of something called "carpet bombing"? There were already enough casualties more in the city than the military. They did the same thing to Vietnam.
@devilonthebay The US came over to Japan?-So you're a Japanese? Why do you pretend you're from the states?
A US beach assault would result in at least 10 millions civilian casualties. Please consider these two FACTS: a) The IJM had issued weapons to Japanese households in major cities; b) The allies would accept nothing but total victory. Don't you think the A-bombs were the best option for saving lives?
Vietnam?-Does it have anything to do with this conversation-You're a stupid kid.
@purity5555 I was born in the US. How am I pretending that I'm from the states? Seeing your persistence, I'm guessing you're either Korean or Chinese? Whenever I see someone that's not just trying to put down Japan and does this persistently are usually Chinese or Korean when it's none of their business. But sorry if I'm wrong.
The second A-bomb is obviously a test. And they've already purposely caused enough casualties to the civilians just like Vietnam dumb kid.
@devilonthebay Born in the US ?- I don't see you love our country at all. Never mind, there are traitors everywhere in any country I guess. Who I'm is not important. I tell the truth too bad you can't handle it.
Btw, calling me Chinese or Korean shows the true color of a racist.
@purity5555 Is there anything wrong with mentioning Vietnam when I mentioned carpet bombing? I'm saying that Japan wasn't the only country. I'm saying this just in case you won't doubt about the carpet bombing because some did.
I've been to Japan. Beautiful country, healthy citizens, democracy, and highly developed economy. I basically agree with what you said yes the allies did kill innocent civilians.
Victor ? - On a second thought, don't you think there is NO victor, only victims? - The US is certainly not a victor. War is evil and should have been outlawed.
What I said about the A-bombs might have been offensive to some and I apologize for that. I think we should drop that topic.
@purity5555 Japan was already ready to surrender after the first bomb. I'm saying that the second one was unnecessary. Sure, the A-bomb which was created by tricking/betraying Albert Einstein probably brought more peace to the world by making an example out of Japan.
It just made me assume that you're either Chinese or Korean. This question was purely out of curiosity. And traitor? The only race I've met that ever called me this over such a simple discussion are usually them. I'm just curious.
@devilonthebay Why are you lying?- Japan was NOT even ready to surrender right after the 2nd bomb. At 11:00 am, Aug.9, News of Nagasaki bombing arrived, the cabinet had a meeting and the big 6 had split 3 - 3, with General Anami, Umezu, and Admiral Toyoda against unconditional surrender. At 14:30pm, meeting again and still 3-3, at 17:30pm meeting again still the same. Another meeting at 22:00 pm still 3-3 ! It was until 2:00 am, Aug 10, Hirohito broke the deadlock and made the decision.
@purity5555 Where did that information come from? US merely had an "excuse" to drop the second bomb. The answer is, there was no excuse and no sound military reason to use it either. The winner simply just decided to write the rules that it was necessary. They were already beaten. That's why US was able to carry two A-bombs over on a slow moving plane. No navy and no air force left to shoot it down. So again, where did you get your information(don't make me repeat this question again)?
@devilonthebay No, you've got to answer my questions: Why are you peeing in public ( lying)?, How was Japan ready to surrender after the 1st bomb?, Who made such decision and what were their positions and at what time they made such decision? - Don't make me repeat these questions, Ok?
The information I quoted is well-written in American and Japanese history books. Why don't you Google 'Surrender of Japan' if you don't have a college education?
Your comment on Dr Einstein's contribution to A-bomb was also a lie and a DIRECT insult to the late scientist. Why don't you Google 'Einstein-Szilard letter' ( written on August 2, 1939) and see what the late scientist had to say to President FDR about A-bombs ?
Tricking Albert Einstein? - That's exactly what you've been trying to do: tricking the decent people by peeing in public.
Americans don't want trash like you in this country.
@purity5555 So you know that Einstein played the biggest role in creating the A-bomb right? And you knew that Einstein loved Japan(which he mentions in his interview) and that he went to apologize to Japan for it as well? I have masters degree and learned history not only in the US but other countries as well and I gotta say that each country has different things written about the SAME subject. You have to be a fool to rely on a text book of one country and be confident with it.
If you read the "Einstein-Szilars letter", you would have understood it was Einstein himself urged President FDR to develop A-bombs.
Einstein loved Japan? - So do I. I have no problem with that.
Masters degree?- Tell me why you love to distort the truths and why you're being so racist ( you judged people by their country of origin and you called China a 'cheapskate country' ). Where is your hatred coming from?
@purity5555 You should also make further research about A-bombs(it wouldn't be on some old newspaper or letters of the US obviously). Lol, and don't be stupid enough to rely on text books. You know how it's not until recently that US FINALLY told the truth about the incidents like Boston Massacre on a text book.
If you have done that research on "Surrender of Japan", you know the events within the Japanese cabinet 12 hours prior to the final decision are the truths. And if you understand those truths, you won't tell me Japan was ready to surrender after the 1st bomb.
@purity5555 Is it the one where the US airs the news of Japan surrendering? First of all, US still writes in the text book that Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack (Henry Kissenger announced that it wasn't), and if you work for the military, you'll know but stations like Fox news announced that there were 5 deaths(I forgot which day it was) when it was reported that only one has died. Some even lies that they're doing reports in the middle of the war zone. I suggest making further research.
@devilonthebay No, that's not the one go GOOGLE again under "Surrender of Japan". As I said Pearl Harbor was a cowardly act NOT a sneak attack. Tell me what "sneak" means?
The Hiroshima bombing killed around half of a million that's true and, the Tokyo fire bombing in April, 1945 killed 100,000 one single night that's also true. While the civilian casualties were regrettable, Japanese warlords such as Hideki Tojo would have to be ultimately held responsible for those tragic events.
@purity5555 So you're saying that it was "written" that it was a "cowardly act" or are you just saying it? Because it was written in my both high school and college text book that it was a "sneak" attack. And Henry Kissinger did announce that they were given a message saying "tiger, tiger, tiger" before the attack which was a code that any country can easily figure out. And I agree how a scum like Hideki Tojo should be held responsible as well for some of the things that went on in war.
It's just how I'm thinking and what I'm saying. I won't challenge what's been written in your text books about Pearl Harbor as everyone has the right to express his or her opinions in a democratic society. On a 2nd thought, don't you think it was not sneak at all ?. Japan was not the only country did that though. Nazi Germany did the same thing when they attacked the USSR on June 22, 1941.
@purity5555 In an argument like this, you're supposed to be using your knowledge and not something that comes from the top of your head. That's considered ignorant in the US(and probably most countries). I'm stating the fact that it was "written" down as a "sneak attack" and you denied and claimed it was a "cowardly act" which ended up being your opinion/thought. Opinion doesn't change the "fact". If you want to criticize the "fact" you need to bring up another "fact" and not opinion.
You must have graduated from the university of idiocy - You don't even know the difference between 'fact' and 'opinion', don't lie to me you have a masters degree. Pearl harbor has been written as an sneak attack in some books but that's also an opinion only NOT a fact. I've also seen it written as an cowardly act in some history books it's also an opinion. Why do I need to bring up any fact when you're telling me your opinion and I'm talking about mine? - thanks for the joke.
Considered ignorant??? - You absolutely have the right to say that but, once again it's your twisted opinion not a fact.
People like you, who are not able to distinguish opinions from facts, are considered ignorant. And those can't stop demonstrating their idiocy are even more ignorant.
@purity5555 When you said "it was a cowardly act" you said that was your own personal opinion. Not once did you say that it came from any written literature until this reply. I guess English really is your second language since you keep taking what I said out of context. You can keep calling me what you want and deny what I said but remember, this isn't PM. Everybody is watching our conversation. All anybody can see is that you can't even fully understand what I previously said(only partial).
@devilonthebay Yes I said it was my personal opinion and I also said it was called an cowardly act in some books. Why would I have to say it in the same post ? - Those authors and I share the same view I don't have to tell the whole world about that, do I ?
I honestly believe my English is far better than yours - I've seen you wrote statements by using broken grammar such as "Have you PAYED attention..." and "They have WENT to..." - It's 'paid' not 'payed', and 'gone' not 'went', OK?
@purity5555 Lol, yes I made a small mistake on a grammar just like making a mistake with "they're" and "their". That automatically makes you assume that you're better? It's a pretty pathetic/childish guess but okay. Unlike how you misinterpret some of what I said, at least those kinds of mistakes wouldn't cause any trouble in a conversation.
"cowardly" act definitely is stating a perspective from an individual. However, a "sneak attack" is not stating a perspective of another but a fact.
You're having serious comprehension problems. Misinterpreted what you said? - I guess it's fair to say you don't know what you've been writing yourself.
Both 'cowardly act' and 'sneak attack' are subjective opinions everyone knows except you.
Don't change subject we've been talking about 'sneak attack' and 'cowardly acts' . Actually this is one of your problems - when we were talking about if China once ruled Japan, you started giving me those graphic descriptions about Tibet, remember?
@purity5555 Yeah, I mentioned Tibet as an example which was still right on the subject until you decided to only reply to the example and go off topic and you blamed me for going off topic(which doesn't make sense). And I'm talking about whether it was written as a fact/definition or an opinion written by an author. "cowardly act" shows the perspective of the author about the Pearl Harbor.
Tell me HOW your example of Tibet was right on the subject? - our topic was if China once ruled Japan. It was obviously off the subject why don't you just admit it ? And I decided to respond it because you were telling a whole bunch of lies.
'cowardly act' shows the perspective of the author? - Correct, so does 'sneak attack'.
@purity5555 *sigh* again, I said I brought up about Tibet as an example to prove some of my point. However, the entire comment was still staying on the subject which any idiot can clearly see. However, you ignored everything I said and focused only on Tibet, and called me an admirer of a terrorist which made no sense. But you on the other hand tried to justify that it makes sense with some pathetic examples.
you are not telling me how Tibet was right on the subject - why are you always avoiding my questions?
Quoting you "any idiot can clearly see" - then you shouldn't have responded my post in the first place as I'm NOT an idiot like yourself and I don't intend to guess what you're saying.
@purity5555 As for Pearl Harbor, why don't you tell me why you said Pearl Harbor was not a sneak attack but a cowardly act(which made no sense and was kind of hilarious). It would make sense if it said Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack, therefore, it's a cowardly act.
You don't know how to read I've caught you many times now. Don't try to cover your ass by saying you're a fast reader. I've explained to you why I thought Pearl Harbor was a cowardly act not a sneak attack many days ago and you try to make me repeat the same thing over and over. Guess what, I'm not an idiot like you.
@purity5555 You can't seem to make a decent reply. And you're going to tell me how I've failed to understand what? It doesn't matter what you say. Telling me that Pearl Harbor was a cowardly act and not a sneak attack is already making me think that you're pretty retarded. What's the point of telling me that and where's the difference? I'm asking you similar questions because obviously, your previous answer wasn't good enough. Why don't you start replying directly to my statement?
I'm asking for the 5th time now - tell me how your Tibet example has anything to do with if China once rule Japan. Don't waste my time by talking about something else.
Where is the difference? - I can't believe you asked this kind of idiotic question - You can't see the difference between a sneak attack and a cowardly act and you have No shame to inform the public. Thanks for your honesty though.
@purity5555 Lol, how does Tibet has anything to do with it? You don't even remember what I brought up Tibet for? And that was merely "part" of my comment that you seemed to have "only" picked up and replied to. That was about how China treats another area they ruled unfairly and if Japan was ever ruled by China, they should have some kind of damage done just like Taiwan and Tibet.
Damage done just like Taiwan and Tibet? - Taiwan is one of the most developed regions in Asia and Tibetans have been enjoying a 50% increase of life expectancy since 1950. Why don't you go to Africa and have a look at those Sub-Saharan countries - it would be in their dreams to have those so-called damages done to them. Don't talk about Taiwan or Tibet if you have not seen them personally.
@purity5555 You really live in the US? Ever see the news reporter and commentators openly talking bad about China when they were talking about Tibet and the Olympics? Quit looking away from the fact. And 50% increase in life expectancy? So what? They're not some zoo animals or some pets. Quit talking about life expectancies and tell me how China is satisfying the citizens in Tibet.
PS: You saw BOTH Taiwan and Tibet personally? I've only seen them in the news in the US.
I'm tired of your comprehension problems. I said "Don't talk about Taiwan and Tibet if you have not seen them personally" - That tells you why I have the right to talk about them and you should shut up, Ok?
Yes, I've been to both of them and I used to live in Okinawa, Japan.
Quit talking about life expectancy??? - Why don't you move to Africa and enjoy dying at 40 years young? - What's the worst form of human right abuse? - Poverty is.
@purity5555 Listen dumbass, if the citizens there has any problem with the government like they've said on the interview on the US news then it's clearly a problem. Quit comparing with the worst. And now I can understand that you're a complete moron. How would I die earlier if I moved to Africa? I already know why some citizens there dies around that age. But can you explain how it'll shorten my life span by living in Africa? You really graduated from college?
@devilonthebay I suddenly realize I've been having this conversation with a couch potato who has never been to Tibet or Taiwan and sitting in front of the TV all day and everyday -Sorry I don't watch TV and I like to see things personally. How would you die earlier? - even a 10 yo kid knows people could die ealier without food and clean drinking water- In fact those are the main reasons those folks over there live to 40 something only. I did graduate from college I'm sure you did not.
@purity5555 And I realized that this is your desperate attempt to make a comeback. It's pretty much common sense for adults to watch the news article on the Internet, tv, and papers. Meaning keeping up with the current events. Here's a question you'll skip answering again. Can you explain how I'm some bum for watching Tibet on the news and Taiwan on the discovery channel? A little while back, you actually made decent replies but now you keep escaping from any topic that I think would expose you.
@devilonthebay You sick little kid stop peeing in public please the whole world knows I'm way ahead of you. Can I explain how you're some bum for watching Tibet on the news...? - Why do I want to waste my time on that kind of trash? Don't I have better things to do? - I don't need a worthless bumbass tell me what to do, period.
I never said there was anything wrong with watching TV. What I meant was I shouldn't have had a conversation with someone who has not personally seen Tibet or Taiwan,
So I guess you're satisfied with my answers on how you would die earlier if you moved to Africa since i saw no response from you on that one - That's GOOOOOD !
Have you ever wondered why you asked those idiotic questions that even a little kid would know the answers?
@purity5555 Lol, there you go again showing your stupidity. I've been replying to you once every 2-4 days and here you are telling me how much spare time you got to waste on the internet. "since i saw no response from you on that one"(I replied to all three of your comments on the same day)? What a joke! Well the conversation here is getting pretty pointless for sure. All you do is dig your own grave each reply and it's getting worse and worse. Go ahead and keep dodging dodging my replies lol.
@devilonthebay Actually you're spending much more time here than I'm - As I told you it takes me less than a minute for a post so 3 posts would usually take me 2 to 3 minutes. That's not alot of time but I agree even that is a waste of time for talking to a worthless dumbass like you.
But look at the bright side, at least now you know how you would die earlier if you moved to Africa - I feel a little better for wasting my precious time on you.
@purity5555 Lol, hey dumbass, the conversation between you and me would have ended a long time ago if you didn't stalk me around and commented on at least 4 more videos. Again, you're the one that willingly started the conversation HERE. You can leave whenever you want to.
2, 3 minutes total? Lol, you sometimes give me replies like "since you didn't reply.....". This shows how much time you spend here and how often you check your inbox on youtube. Nice try.
@purity5555 You failed big time on that reply. You're the one sending me back replies right back on that day. For the first time, your reply delayed a bit seeing the date you replied back. So not only do you have a fast computer, you read and type fast eh? Showing me how much you wrote tells me how much time you take. Put it all together and it seems like it takes more time than you're telling me but okay lol.
I still remember how you sent me 4-5 paragraphs worth of reply on one video.
sending you replies right back on the same day? - what's wrong with that? - What exactly are you trying to say? You've been ripping farts recently, saying things that have no weight or substance at all..I guess you simply enjoy being a fart in the wind that will be quickly blown away and forgotten.
I sent you 4-5 paragraphs? - When and where ??? - even if I did, that would take 4 minutes maximum.
@purity5555 I'm not trying to say that it's bad which is pretty obvious. And you just lied to me about how much time you take when you type. I just checked my mail and it's showing me how much time you took each reply. You're taking at least more than 20 minutes each reply. Is your computer slow? 2-3 minutes? Do you really watch the clock while typing? You sent me the reply 9 minutes after your last reply. Nice try.
Don't get tooooooo excited..sounds to me you're got a big fish or jerking off in your Mummie's undies.
Actually there was more than one hour between the 1st post and the PM, does it necessarily indicate much time I took for each post? - And any reason why couldn't I do something else in between? - try harder you dumbass.
Lied to you? - Is it because you've been lying all the time?
actually that exactly tells me how much time you're spending here in YT: Day and night you're sitting in front of the computer screen waiting and watching email messages to come in, and counting how many minutes between each message...and assuming the senders would do nothing else in between messages because you're the center of everyone's universe...Why can't you get a life?
You're clearly showing the symtoms of mania. Get help before it's too late.
@purity5555 Lol, you failed big time on this one. People who's desperate with their comebacks always tries to copy what I say. If I call them dumb, they call me dumb, if I call them a bum, they call me a bum, etc. All I have to do is look at the side of the message to see the time which I haven't done. And it seems to me, that you keep talking about yourself. Well, I'll just see how much time you take on every reply from now on then.
@purity5555 Even if I replied couple of days later like usual, it'll still show how much time you took in the inbox. Lol, I hope you're not going to say that checking my inbox would make me a bum like you.
@purity5555 It sure seems to me that you keep taking my words though. Lol, I was the one that called you someone with no life because you showed me how much time you waste on the net. And now you're calling me a bum? For what? And a minute to reply? You mean a minute to read and write at the same time? Lol, although I don't believe you, how fast you reply still does not tell me if you're a bum or not though kid.
Stop accusing I take your words you're taking mine everone knows. I take a minute to read and write? - you got it right for the 1st time in your life, congratulation!
Now the whole world knows you're a gutless shovelface bitch who has to block my PM.
@purity5555 So you definitely take a minute to read and write. Then I guess you have a very slow and cheap computer. Didn't I tell you before that I can tell how much time you take each reply? But if you claim that you're just doing "something" in the middle of typing in every single reply then okay, I believe you lol. I don't even see the need to argue over this childish subject anyway.
PS: "gutless shovelface bitch who has to block my PM" Lol! It's common sense to kick out a troll.
I hate this being used as propaganda, because this has nothing to do with politics, using his actions in politics dishonours him, he done it out of his kindness in his heart, and this is how he should always be remembered, that spark of humanity inside man
And they never mention about disadvantages for them such as Korean army's slaughtering in Vietnam or, previous Korean goverment asked an annexation of Korea to Japan themselves. But it cant help to do that, cuz Korean goverment must hide the truth.
How many times does dirty want to use pure words such as ass, bitch and sicko?Please tell me somebody. Btw, I recommend not to trust korean history, many of them are just created after WW2 to govern Korea by new government.Now it is commonsense.
A good and decent man. The Japanese had studied Jews and Judaism and knew the Germans were full of shit. They also knew in their hearts that eventually these racist bastards would be out to get all the non-whites if they treated other whites like this. Look what they did to the Baltic peoples, the Slavs and anyone else who got in their way. You Jew haters should remember, the Nazis exterminated your people as fast as they could also. 1/10 of Poles, 25 million in the USSR and that's just to start
This has been flagged as spam show
Who wants to know the truth about the Jews and what will happen to the world of Phil read a book called Quran where all the secrets from the world
誰がユダヤ人についての真実を知りたがっていると何フィルの世界に起こることは世界からすべての秘密コーランと呼ばれる本を読んで
TBVOW 1 day ago in playlist Autres vidéos de JapanGovernment
Who wants to know the truth about the Jews and what will happen to the world of Phil read a book called Quran where all the secrets from the world
誰がユダヤ人についての真実を知りたがっていると何フィルの世界に起こることは世界からすべての秘密コーランと呼ばれる本を読んで
TBVOW 1 day ago in playlist Autres vidéos de JapanGovernment
Jews, the most dangerous people in the world they are adept at setting fire between peoples and countries like the publication of discord and strife is worse than murder
ユダヤ人、彼らは人々と不和と争いの出版物のような国々の間で火を得意としている世界で最も危険な人々は殺人より悪いです。
TBVOW 1 day ago in playlist Autres vidéos de JapanGovernment
Jews betrayed Japanese by cooperating Chinese and Koreans for anti-Japan propaganda. In addition, racism is wrong of course but Jews surely deserved to be discriminated in Germany for what they did to Germans. Yet, Nazi didn't try to exterminate Jews in concentration camps at all. Google "Holocaust denier". Think why Jews prohibited Allies' bombing on railways to concentration camps.
moontokyo 2 weeks ago
『関東軍の暴走』と同じく『ナチの魔の手』はプロパガンダなんですけどね。第１次大戦直前あたりからのユダヤ人の動きとそれに対するドイツ人の対応を調べたら、ナチスが悪などとは誰も言えません。実際に、実証主義を実践するユダヤ人はナチスに同情的ですらあります。日本人なら『マルコポーロ事件』をきちんと調べること。そして、サイモンウィーゼンタールセンター（イスラエルのロビー団体）が特亜の反日プロパガンダ支援をしている現実を直視してください。なお、古代ユダヤ人が日本人の先祖というのはアシュケナージ・ユダヤ人の言い分であり、日本と古代ユダヤ人の歴史を比べれば日本の歴史の方が古く日本人が古代ユダヤ人の先祖である可能性も同等以上にあることを認識しましょう。
moontokyo 2 weeks ago
this is a disgrace to our country! it was a betray to our allies man!!!
OkamiWillDefeatSilva 1 month ago
この人程ではないけど、各地の日本大使館ではあちこちでビザ発行してたんだよね。
それに、ビザが発行されたら行く先は日本。
不備があったり、読めないようなビザでも結局日本が受け入れたことは
知っておいてほしいね。
ikamero 2 months ago
omfg lithuanians saved like thousands of jews by risking their lives yet nobody ever appreciates that for fuck sake jew themselves don't like us i mean WTF ?
skuterixas91 2 months ago
This shouldn't be ignored
TheKoodude7 3 months ago
China should show us conclusive evidence about the massacre. Chinese government says 300,000 civilians were killed by the Japanese. However, the Nanking population was 250,000 before Japanese soldiers came. Moreover, the number of the population increased to 270,000 in Feb, 1938. How can you explain about this fact? China fabricated at least 143 pictures of the atrocity, and it paid money to foreigners to write books and news articles over the massacre rumor. Liar China!
undertakerRach 5 months ago 4
by his achievement , his name is in Golden book.
I respect him with highest salute and true Samurai Bushido spirits.
thanks.
hebrews11jp 5 months ago
so good to hear that he helped people i wold of got so many Jewish people to help write this documents and get through all of them.R.I.P for the japan guy
eddiegogan 6 months ago
この事実を知って日本に感謝してくれて日本に対し好意を持ってくれるイスラエル人がいたとしたらそれはとても嬉しいことだけれど、かといって、現代のイスラエル人が対パレスチナで採っているやり方は・・・正直、支持できない。
しかし、じゃあ、イスラエルが100%悪いと一方的に非難することもためらわれる。もし、今、世界で信じがたい事態が起こって、我々日本人が日本の土地を追われたとしたら、たとえ自分の世代では無理だとしても、何百年先、何千年先の我々の子孫がいつか我が土地に戻ってくれることを心から切に願ってやまないだろうからだ。
candycookiechocolate 9 months ago
What about the Holocaust caused by Japan???? 18 million killed.
TheJuanlozanoism 9 months ago
@TheJuanlozanoism
Kiichiro Higuchi (1888 - 1970), the Imperial Japanese Army Officer.
As a major general and the commander of the Harbin Special Branch in 1938, he allowed some 20,000 Jewish refugees who had fled Nazi Germany to cross the border from the Soviet Union to Manchukuo.
A few of his subordinates, were responsible for feeding the refugees, settling them in Harbin or Shanghai, or arranging for exit visas. 80% of those refugees entered to USA via Shanghai.
(to be continued)
2008venom 8 months ago
But Foreign minister Nazi German von Ribbentrop sent his letter to Japanese government via Ambassador Eugen Ott, and protested about Higuchi's decision.
Higuchi's superior oficer, Hideki Tojo, Chief of Staff of the Kwangtong Army (IJA troops stationed in Manchukuo) called Higuchi to his office and asked. Higuchi told that "It was an act of humanity. I have respect for alliance, but Japan is not a vassal country of Germany."
Tojo agreed that, and supported Higuchi's decision.
(continued)
2008venom 8 months ago
Tojo was appointed to Prime Minister of Japan in 1941 and executed as a war criminal after the war.
But Higuchi was not accused, and calmly died as an civilian in 1970.
In December 2009, Israeli ambassador to Japan presented the park to commemorate Higuchi's act with a olive sapling.
2008venom 8 months ago
@TheJuanlozanoism
How about holocaust caused by Chinese Communist Party in 1950s to 1970s ?
70 million (incredible !) killed.
2008venom 8 months ago
@TheJuanlozanoism
THIS CLIP ISN'T ABOUT "HOLOCAUST"! Discuss it elsewhere if you want to, moron. Beside that number is highly controversial.
indiehunk 6 months ago
●911 Inside Job and Hereafter (Modified) by richardkoshimzu
●9-11 AND STEALTH JEWISH
sunrise58176 11 months ago
This case both proves the mass emergency emigration of Polish Jews abroad even after 1st Sept., 1939. It also disproves the WW2 U.S. propaganda of Japanese being "unhuman insects" which still continues in many Hollywood nonsense. The introduction about the Soviet Union being "anti-Jewish" is nonsense; the Soviets evacuated between 1.5 and 2.5 million Jews from eastern Poland and Ukraine before the 1941 invasion of the Nazis. We all like Japan. The atomic bombings of August 1945 were war crimes.
IustitiaPax 11 months ago
@IustitiaPax - Interesting documentary, but if you are talking about "proving", the only thing it proves is that all the generalizations about ANY nation are wrong. Unfortunately many attrocies committed by the Japanese during WW2 were not "Hollywood nonsense". They are quite well documented. As I said - nations are neither good or bad. We can only talk about individuals who are good (as in this case) or bad. We cen also talk about the policy of the government, but not about the nation.
OlenkaWagner 11 months ago
@OlenkaWagner - Soviet Union became anti-semitic after WW2 (during Israeli-Palestinian crisis). Before that it was not the case, although there were some streaks of antisemitism before that as well (in Russia antisemitism was quite strong).
OlenkaWagner 11 months ago
@OlenkaWagner The Soviet Union was never antisemitic. Not even after 1948. In 1948 the USSR supplied the Israeli Army and Irgun with Czechoslovak weapons. It only changed after Golda Meir's Moscow speech. It was anti-Zionism, not racial antisemitism at all. Pre-1917 Russian antisemitism was based on religious conflicts and on Jewish marxism.
IustitiaPax 11 months ago
@IustitiaPax - OK, not racially-based, but culturally and religiously-based. If you narrow down the definition of antisemitism to racially-based issue, I agree - there was no antisemitism. It was anti-Zionism and anti-Iudaism - this time it could have been Marxism against any religion, including Iudaism.
OlenkaWagner 11 months ago
@OlenkaWagner Many crimes of the Japanese were deliberately exaggerated or invented by U.S. propaganda. But of course I know the Japanese were ruthless powerful imperialists and merciless in their internment camps and against resistance. But the Japanese were more civilized than e.g. Mao's Chinese Communists. And more human than U.S. Army bombing in Laos War after 1955. (I am not anti-American though, not at all!) The Japanese Empire was imperialist, but demonized in Western propaganda.
IustitiaPax 11 months ago
@OlenkaWagner I had relatives in Japanese camps in Dutch East Indies (Indonesia now). It was harsh: many dead, starvation, dehydration, cholera. And forced prostitution too. But no 100,000+ massacres like the 1945 American bombing of Tokyo civil residential areas with fire bombs. Nor comparable to the Nagasaki atomic massacre of civilians.
IustitiaPax 11 months ago
@IustitiaPax - I think the woerst crimes of the Japanese were the crimes against POWs. They did not even pretend to respect the Geneva Convention in this issue. The treatment of civillian internees was better than the treatment of POWs. Of course you can always argue what is worse: bombing civilians or allowing slow death due to inhumane treatment? This is a philosophical question. Another thing is that Japanese actually never apologized for the crimes (unlike Germans).
OlenkaWagner 11 months ago
@OlenkaWagner The Japanese abused their POWs for forced labour under horrible circumstances. I wholly agree with you. But do you remember Ike Eisenhower's "Disarmed Enemy Forces" camps (death camps) to starve German POWs in 1945? Or the Soviet GULAGs for POWs from 1945-1955. In them, only 6 % of taken German POWs survived and could return thanks to Adenauer in 1955. And in 1921 the Polish Army also starved Soviet POWs in POW camps. I hope in future all states will respect the Geneva Convention!
IustitiaPax 11 months ago
@IustitiaPax - I've never said that the Japanese were the ONLY or even the WORST in their treatment of POWs. I think a good (although not only) indicator about the treatment could be the percentage of POWs who survived. In case of Soviet Union it was the lowest in fact, but in case of Japan it was also low. In case of the Western Allies the percentage was much higher ("Disarmed Enemy Forces" camps increased this percentage, but overall it remained much lower than is other cases).
OlenkaWagner 11 months ago
@OlenkaWagner. Yes, in case of Japan it was also low. Due to tropical diseases and food scarcity, as well as forced labour the death rate was high. But the Soviets deliberately pursued killing of German POWs by death labour. The Allied POWs inside the Japanese islands had high survival rates. In case of the western Allies it was higher only after the Eisenhower camps. But even De Gaulle and French POW camps for German soldiers used forced labour and enslaved German boys of 16 year old until 1948
IustitiaPax 11 months ago
@OlenkaWagner I am glad you are fair. As for the western Allies: the fate of their POWs was never of interest to any Hollywood movies or any state-financed historians. Not even suitable for Soviet propaganda, as it would prove Soviet hypocrisy and blame the Allied Soviet "War against Fascism" alliance. The German POWs (or "Disarmed Enemy Forces") were given the worst treatment of all, after pro-Axis Ukrainian, Belarussian, RUssian and Latvian volunteers against Stalin.
IustitiaPax 11 months ago
@OlenkaWagner The Japanese Empire unlike the German Empire, was merely US-occupied and reformed, but the head of state of Japan, Hirohito, remained in power. And the Japanese were not subjected to Mass Psychological Warfare and Allied Re-Education and PSYOP (compare Smith-Mundelein Act) like the German people were from 1945 until 2011 (or 1991). I know about Japanese crimes of course. But why can other war criminals go around as "heroes"? This is a sad truth of human viciousness.
IustitiaPax 11 months ago
But Jews droped A-bomb to Hiroshima and Nagasaki!!!
ajlaviva 11 months ago
You shall be honored god bless you thank you for being a helper of god bless you:D
ErinLovegood 1 year ago
SUGIHARA was a messanger from G-d.
Jewdicris 1 year ago
i can believe how strong person he was
tiptas 1 year ago
A True Human Being.
nacho1685 1 year ago 2
でもユダヤ人は日本に原爆を。。。
4664sixx 1 year ago 5
@4664sixx
そしてあなたは そうやって不和の種を。。。
009kandata 11 months ago
An act of kindness by one Japanese man that shall forever bind the friendship between Japan and Israel.A victory without war,he won friendship with the Israelis without firing a bullet,he saved them instead.Victory without war,he conquered the heart of the jews and the world,we thank him for it too....his name forever glorified,he died a hero to Japan,to Israel and to whole humanity.The Japanese ought to be proud,very proud of their son.God bless SUGIHARA.
MaoSuratt911 1 year ago 2
The strenght of a man's virtues should not be judged by his special efforts,but by his ordinary behaviour.Virtue is its own reward...
MaoSuratt911 1 year ago
Jews are like rats - always escaping from every possible hole
Mrjaguarpaw1 1 year ago
What a hero. Legendary man!
ImeldaDavies 1 year ago
This idiot ! those people were obviously Jewish spys.
illuminatijews 1 year ago
当時のキリスト教の最高位であるローマ法王でさえヒトラーに対してユダヤ人狩りの強力を強いられていたのに、日本の要人は完全と拒否をしてる。この他にもユダヤ人を保護した日本人はいたのだ。満州にいた日本軍将校もその一人。みんな八紘一宇というと、右翼見たいというけど”天皇陛下のもと万民みな平等”という意味が浸透していた。だからドイツとの関係を憂う人も居る中で、積極的に行動出来る人達が居た。このときユダヤの資本力が絶対的だったアメリカでさえユダヤ民族を救っていない。日本はWWⅡで悪役にされている。けれど国連での人種差別撤廃案といい、その事実を１つとっても日本が目指していた物は明確だと思う。人権や自然環境についてそれらしい事を語っていてもとんでもない事を言う国が多い中で日本が世界の流れのトップを走っていたのだと言う事は誠に誇りに思う。
anjedaisuki 1 year ago 22
Occupation and deprivation of basic human rights are examples of the ongoing crimes that Israel is committing against the indigenous Palestinian population now.
rabahalrabi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CCP brainwashed it's own people by teaching Anti -Japanese education
presenting it's people bunch of fabricated fake photos of massacres, to make them believe and force it's people to deal with it's low wage labor system.
That is how Japan apologized and to many countries in Asia only not to China.
WAKE UP Chinese people, are you still going to get enough being a slave of a communist group like CCP?
watch:
watch?v=WEH3FRaK2k0&feature=gr-ec_index
watch?v=aefFXZhOWBQ
watch?v=VvFk2fPHHnk
USFullOfLies 1 year ago
WOW
amazing story, true hero
He risk life of family to rescue other human
tiptas 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tiptas Unfortunately jews are not human , so he should have regretted what he did
Mrjaguarpaw1 1 year ago
@Mrjaguarpaw1 and you deserve to die pianfully of cancer...enjoy!
comicstew 1 year ago
"Even a hunter cannot kill a bird which flies to him for refuge." - Samurai Proverb, quoted by Sugihara when asked why he disobeyed his government.
God bless this saintly man.
Asarelah 1 year ago 5
日本人の誇りだわ
muffinsflavors 1 year ago
多くの日本人がこの事実を知りません。
こういう事を子供達に教育で伝えていかなければいけないと思います。
２０世紀に人類が学んだことを忘れてはいけない。
iloverock911 1 year ago 4
He should've won the Nobel Peace Prize
goe5 1 year ago 6
Comment removed
minazuki 1 year ago
Why sint this mentioned in history books? Why arnt those brave people who risked so much in orde to help tjeir fellow man written about in every damn history book? These people inspire me to do good.
SamuelThomasRanger 1 year ago 8
@SamuelThomasRanger Because there are so many. So they make documentaries and write biographies about them instead.
itwillbealright 1 year ago
@SamuelThomasRanger I Japan have won the war, he should be considered a traitor.
Most of japanese people were brainwashed by the nationalism and the loyalty to the emperor at the time. Saving jews was an individual action and it's not part of Japan History, but of an individual wich made the difference in the History. He deserves a place in the Word History, not the japanese history books and their lies.
Idonteatdog 1 year ago
@Idonteatdog i mean worLd... f***g keyboard.
Idonteatdog 1 year ago
What a sad story. The strange part is that the Japanese had their own genocide in China and it some cases it was much worse but not as many people were killed.... at least during the WW2 time frame. Their are good and bad people everywhere you go and here is a prime example of a good person that was part of a bad regime.
flatblackstrat 1 year ago
@flatblackstrat are you counting with the percentage? the total number of genocide by japannese would be 12 million chinese by R. J. Rummel. And yes ur right, there are good people everywhere. But not as many 'good' japanese you could find in china during ww2...
misshsyuha 1 year ago
@misshsyuha What percentage? No sorry but 12 million were not killed as part of genocide in the WW2 time frame and 12 million were not killed in Nan-king The population back then wasn't even 12 million I think. But Japan had invaded china and korea way before that so the actual number is still unknown. But if you included military deaths and everything all together I'm sure that number is possible.
flatblackstrat 1 year ago
@flatblackstrat: the sad thing is you only know Nan-Jing. What about the people who were killed under the policy of “burn all,kill all, loot all”...? I don't think that can be counted as military deaths...it makes little sense for us to discuss this topic here...nothing will change... the death never revive..
misshsyuha 1 year ago
Those Nazis thought they had e/thing tied up, but they didn't count on men like this.
Hard to watch this without feeling anger, then humility. Jews probably left Japan after the war anyway? And this is the story of one man, not 'the Japanese'.
moyadapne 1 year ago
@moyadapne But he was Japanese...a whole race can't be evil. Just the evil ones stood out during the war.
goe5 1 year ago
@goe5 For sure, but a lot of the good ones weren't in a position to help. My statement meant that a whole nation can't be held responsible for a few evil men. I'm in agreeance with you.
moyadapne 1 year ago
@moyadapne Not only one man but Japanese govt was totally against Nazism and racism even though Japan allied Germany. General Higuchi saved Jewish refugees' lives in Otpor(1938). Baron Makino submitted Racial Equality Proposal for the first time in the world(1919). JFYI.
Daviysoh 1 month ago
LoL, didn't the Japanese later Kick all Jewish refugees out of Japan ?
rogvr781 1 year ago
@rogvr781 They actually succeeded in sending Jewish refugees to America, Israel,and Shanghai safely.
Daviysoh 1 month ago
A Truely Remarkable Humantarian Sugihara Chinue, We will remember your name :-)
brownhugo 1 year ago
当時の日本の国情では、ドイツへの裏切り行為とも取れる行動を
敢えて犯してでも命を救った日本人外交官が居たんですね(つД；)
現在でも日本では有名ではない外交官です。
こういう行動は大いに見習いたいものです。
moekihonami 1 year ago 17
@moekihonami
1938年3月、ナチドイツの迫害からシベリア鉄道で逃れ来たユダヤ難民たち約2万人が、ソ連から満州に入れず吹雪の中で立ち往生し、飢えと寒さにより危機にさらされていた。
当時の日本陸軍・ハルピン特務機関長を務めていた樋口季一郎少将はすぐ救援列車を手配し、難民を暖かい施設へ収容し、食事や医療・滞在許可など便宜を図って彼らの命を救った。 その後彼らの80％は、上海などを経由してアメリカに逃れた。
ナチドイツのリッべントロップ外相は、オットー駐日大使を通じて、樋口の行為につき強硬に抗議した。
しかし当時の関東軍参謀長であり、樋口の上官だった東條英機は、樋口の言葉、
「日満両国が、かかる非人道的なドイツの国策に協力すべきものであるとするならば、これまた、驚くべき 軽侮であり、人倫の道にそむくものであるといわねばならないでしょう。 日本はドイツの属国ではないし、満洲国もまた、日本の属国ではない。」 に大きくうなずき、東京の外務省や軍中央の処罰要求をはねつけた。
この話をすると、東條がA級戦犯の戦争狂だと思っていた欧米人は大変驚きます。
2008venom 8 months ago
how come there`s 13 thumbs down?nazis?
eine52 1 year ago
Its people like Sugihara that make the world a better place.....
Thank you
dwshiuani 1 year ago
What a Great Human Being.Rest in peace Mr.Sugihara.
HerrMaladroitMann 1 year ago
杉原千畝を尊重。真の人道。
Respect to Sugihara Chiune. A true humanitarian.
wordreet 1 year ago
al imran
85
And whoso seeketh as religion other than the Surrender (to Allah) it will not be accepted from him, and he will be a loser in the Hereafter.
86
How shall Allah guide a people who disbelieved after their belief and (after) they bore witness that the messenger is true and after clear proofs (of Allah's sovereignty) had come unto them. And Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk.
zldiable 1 year ago
this is beautiful...
TheHolyWizard 1 year ago
彼は岐阜県八百津町の出身です。
彼の生家は現在、記念館になっています。
僕の地元の英雄です。
Wataru61 1 year ago 2
It's never wrong to save people from government oppression - and death!
God bless Sugihara.
AcePilot2009 1 year ago 2
Unsung heroes...
bilber18 1 year ago
know the holocaust, check this website
therealholocaust(dot)org
spoiledboy1985 1 year ago
There are also news that during WW2, Japan rescued the UK ship while giving them food and shelter and returned them back to their country. This story was told by a retired UK marine. However, China and Korea is still busy promoting hate towards Japan so the government can use it as a camouflage to so the citizens would look the other way while they're doing something. What they don't teach is Japan was the one that westernized them.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
You're either ignorant or lying - More than half of those British marines 'rescued' by the Japanese DID NOT return home, they actually died in captivity.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Then what was that interview with the real retired UK marine talking about that on youtube? That video even had real black and white photos of the UK marines returning safely from the Japanese ship. Now for most cases, I obviously know that UK and Japan showed no mercy to each other. Being tortured for interrogation, killed without mercy, etc. Both sides did this to each other. Since when did I ever say that the "entire" Japanese marines didn't kill any of their hostages?
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
But your previous post was obviously misleading. You said "returned them back to their country". The truth is: more than half of "them" would never see their country again.
If you said "returned LESS THAN HALF OF THEM back to their country then I would understand.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 I agree that it was misleading. I wasn't talking about every UK ship that was seeking help but one UK ship which was sunk by the attack of Japanese air force which this one Japanese ship rescued. The UK crew member in that ship were all returned safely back to their country. As for all the Japanese rescue boats or crews that survived at sea, it's said that all of them died when they were found by their enemies.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Don't you think the US saved A LOT more lives ( Japanese and American) by dropping the A-bombs comparing to what the Japanese boats did? - At least 10 milions of Japanese lives were saved. And what about those US marines who gave their lives for the liberation of Japan? - Do they deserve your sympathy at all ?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 The US came over to Japan and killed mostly civilians and a lot more CITIZENS died when US dropped the A-bomb right in the middle of where people lives. Before giving the chance of surrender with the first bomb, US immediately dropped the second bomb mainly as a test. US bombed Bikini Island for the same reason(test).
Ever heard of something called "carpet bombing"? There were already enough casualties more in the city than the military. They did the same thing to Vietnam.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
Comment removed
purity5555 1 year ago
@devilonthebay The US came over to Japan?-So you're a Japanese? Why do you pretend you're from the states?
A US beach assault would result in at least 10 millions civilian casualties. Please consider these two FACTS: a) The IJM had issued weapons to Japanese households in major cities; b) The allies would accept nothing but total victory. Don't you think the A-bombs were the best option for saving lives?
Vietnam?-Does it have anything to do with this conversation-You're a stupid kid.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 I was born in the US. How am I pretending that I'm from the states? Seeing your persistence, I'm guessing you're either Korean or Chinese? Whenever I see someone that's not just trying to put down Japan and does this persistently are usually Chinese or Korean when it's none of their business. But sorry if I'm wrong.
The second A-bomb is obviously a test. And they've already purposely caused enough casualties to the civilians just like Vietnam dumb kid.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay Born in the US ?- I don't see you love our country at all. Never mind, there are traitors everywhere in any country I guess. Who I'm is not important. I tell the truth too bad you can't handle it.
Btw, calling me Chinese or Korean shows the true color of a racist.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Is there anything wrong with mentioning Vietnam when I mentioned carpet bombing? I'm saying that Japan wasn't the only country. I'm saying this just in case you won't doubt about the carpet bombing because some did.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Vietnam has nothing to do with our topic that's all. My point is the A-bombs saved a lot more lives you failed to challenge that.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555
I'm a Japanese.
Japan certainly committed a lot of crimes,like Rape of Nanjing.
However, the victor writes the history.
There are many examples of the Allies's having killed the civilian, too.
Countries that participated in war are the assailants, and victims.
Some bureaucrats in Japan tried to have them end a war desperately.
It is an insult to the victim, and is wrong to be able to save the life with the nuclear weapon from original.
Sorry for poor English.
ukokyun48 1 year ago
Comment removed
purity5555 1 year ago
@ukokyun48
I've been to Japan. Beautiful country, healthy citizens, democracy, and highly developed economy. I basically agree with what you said yes the allies did kill innocent civilians.
Victor ? - On a second thought, don't you think there is NO victor, only victims? - The US is certainly not a victor. War is evil and should have been outlawed.
What I said about the A-bombs might have been offensive to some and I apologize for that. I think we should drop that topic.
Take care.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Japan was already ready to surrender after the first bomb. I'm saying that the second one was unnecessary. Sure, the A-bomb which was created by tricking/betraying Albert Einstein probably brought more peace to the world by making an example out of Japan.
It just made me assume that you're either Chinese or Korean. This question was purely out of curiosity. And traitor? The only race I've met that ever called me this over such a simple discussion are usually them. I'm just curious.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay Why are you lying?- Japan was NOT even ready to surrender right after the 2nd bomb. At 11:00 am, Aug.9, News of Nagasaki bombing arrived, the cabinet had a meeting and the big 6 had split 3 - 3, with General Anami, Umezu, and Admiral Toyoda against unconditional surrender. At 14:30pm, meeting again and still 3-3, at 17:30pm meeting again still the same. Another meeting at 22:00 pm still 3-3 ! It was until 2:00 am, Aug 10, Hirohito broke the deadlock and made the decision.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Where did that information come from? US merely had an "excuse" to drop the second bomb. The answer is, there was no excuse and no sound military reason to use it either. The winner simply just decided to write the rules that it was necessary. They were already beaten. That's why US was able to carry two A-bombs over on a slow moving plane. No navy and no air force left to shoot it down. So again, where did you get your information(don't make me repeat this question again)?
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay No, you've got to answer my questions: Why are you peeing in public ( lying)?, How was Japan ready to surrender after the 1st bomb?, Who made such decision and what were their positions and at what time they made such decision? - Don't make me repeat these questions, Ok?
The information I quoted is well-written in American and Japanese history books. Why don't you Google 'Surrender of Japan' if you don't have a college education?
I guess you're proud of being a liar.
purity5555 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Your comment on Dr Einstein's contribution to A-bomb was also a lie and a DIRECT insult to the late scientist. Why don't you Google 'Einstein-Szilard letter' ( written on August 2, 1939) and see what the late scientist had to say to President FDR about A-bombs ?
Tricking Albert Einstein? - That's exactly what you've been trying to do: tricking the decent people by peeing in public.
Americans don't want trash like you in this country.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 So you know that Einstein played the biggest role in creating the A-bomb right? And you knew that Einstein loved Japan(which he mentions in his interview) and that he went to apologize to Japan for it as well? I have masters degree and learned history not only in the US but other countries as well and I gotta say that each country has different things written about the SAME subject. You have to be a fool to rely on a text book of one country and be confident with it.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
If you read the "Einstein-Szilars letter", you would have understood it was Einstein himself urged President FDR to develop A-bombs.
Einstein loved Japan? - So do I. I have no problem with that.
Masters degree?- Tell me why you love to distort the truths and why you're being so racist ( you judged people by their country of origin and you called China a 'cheapskate country' ). Where is your hatred coming from?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 You should also make further research about A-bombs(it wouldn't be on some old newspaper or letters of the US obviously). Lol, and don't be stupid enough to rely on text books. You know how it's not until recently that US FINALLY told the truth about the incidents like Boston Massacre on a text book.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
If you have done that research on "Surrender of Japan", you know the events within the Japanese cabinet 12 hours prior to the final decision are the truths. And if you understand those truths, you won't tell me Japan was ready to surrender after the 1st bomb.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Is it the one where the US airs the news of Japan surrendering? First of all, US still writes in the text book that Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack (Henry Kissenger announced that it wasn't), and if you work for the military, you'll know but stations like Fox news announced that there were 5 deaths(I forgot which day it was) when it was reported that only one has died. Some even lies that they're doing reports in the middle of the war zone. I suggest making further research.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay No, that's not the one go GOOGLE again under "Surrender of Japan". As I said Pearl Harbor was a cowardly act NOT a sneak attack. Tell me what "sneak" means?
The Hiroshima bombing killed around half of a million that's true and, the Tokyo fire bombing in April, 1945 killed 100,000 one single night that's also true. While the civilian casualties were regrettable, Japanese warlords such as Hideki Tojo would have to be ultimately held responsible for those tragic events.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 So you're saying that it was "written" that it was a "cowardly act" or are you just saying it? Because it was written in my both high school and college text book that it was a "sneak" attack. And Henry Kissinger did announce that they were given a message saying "tiger, tiger, tiger" before the attack which was a code that any country can easily figure out. And I agree how a scum like Hideki Tojo should be held responsible as well for some of the things that went on in war.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
It's just how I'm thinking and what I'm saying. I won't challenge what's been written in your text books about Pearl Harbor as everyone has the right to express his or her opinions in a democratic society. On a 2nd thought, don't you think it was not sneak at all ?. Japan was not the only country did that though. Nazi Germany did the same thing when they attacked the USSR on June 22, 1941.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555
Jesus christ will you two childish babies just SHUT THE FUCK UP ! !
You have been going on for months arguing gotdammit !
askjiir 1 year ago
@purity5555 In an argument like this, you're supposed to be using your knowledge and not something that comes from the top of your head. That's considered ignorant in the US(and probably most countries). I'm stating the fact that it was "written" down as a "sneak attack" and you denied and claimed it was a "cowardly act" which ended up being your opinion/thought. Opinion doesn't change the "fact". If you want to criticize the "fact" you need to bring up another "fact" and not opinion.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
You must have graduated from the university of idiocy - You don't even know the difference between 'fact' and 'opinion', don't lie to me you have a masters degree. Pearl harbor has been written as an sneak attack in some books but that's also an opinion only NOT a fact. I've also seen it written as an cowardly act in some history books it's also an opinion. Why do I need to bring up any fact when you're telling me your opinion and I'm talking about mine? - thanks for the joke.
purity5555 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Considered ignorant??? - You absolutely have the right to say that but, once again it's your twisted opinion not a fact.
People like you, who are not able to distinguish opinions from facts, are considered ignorant. And those can't stop demonstrating their idiocy are even more ignorant.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 When you said "it was a cowardly act" you said that was your own personal opinion. Not once did you say that it came from any written literature until this reply. I guess English really is your second language since you keep taking what I said out of context. You can keep calling me what you want and deny what I said but remember, this isn't PM. Everybody is watching our conversation. All anybody can see is that you can't even fully understand what I previously said(only partial).
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay Yes I said it was my personal opinion and I also said it was called an cowardly act in some books. Why would I have to say it in the same post ? - Those authors and I share the same view I don't have to tell the whole world about that, do I ?
I honestly believe my English is far better than yours - I've seen you wrote statements by using broken grammar such as "Have you PAYED attention..." and "They have WENT to..." - It's 'paid' not 'payed', and 'gone' not 'went', OK?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Lol, yes I made a small mistake on a grammar just like making a mistake with "they're" and "their". That automatically makes you assume that you're better? It's a pretty pathetic/childish guess but okay. Unlike how you misinterpret some of what I said, at least those kinds of mistakes wouldn't cause any trouble in a conversation.
"cowardly" act definitely is stating a perspective from an individual. However, a "sneak attack" is not stating a perspective of another but a fact.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
You're having serious comprehension problems. Misinterpreted what you said? - I guess it's fair to say you don't know what you've been writing yourself.
Both 'cowardly act' and 'sneak attack' are subjective opinions everyone knows except you.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 If I said "you ambushed me" am I stating a fact or an opinion? This seriously is an obvious one.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Don't change subject we've been talking about 'sneak attack' and 'cowardly acts' . Actually this is one of your problems - when we were talking about if China once ruled Japan, you started giving me those graphic descriptions about Tibet, remember?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Yeah, I mentioned Tibet as an example which was still right on the subject until you decided to only reply to the example and go off topic and you blamed me for going off topic(which doesn't make sense). And I'm talking about whether it was written as a fact/definition or an opinion written by an author. "cowardly act" shows the perspective of the author about the Pearl Harbor.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Tell me HOW your example of Tibet was right on the subject? - our topic was if China once ruled Japan. It was obviously off the subject why don't you just admit it ? And I decided to respond it because you were telling a whole bunch of lies.
'cowardly act' shows the perspective of the author? - Correct, so does 'sneak attack'.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 *sigh* again, I said I brought up about Tibet as an example to prove some of my point. However, the entire comment was still staying on the subject which any idiot can clearly see. However, you ignored everything I said and focused only on Tibet, and called me an admirer of a terrorist which made no sense. But you on the other hand tried to justify that it makes sense with some pathetic examples.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
you are not telling me how Tibet was right on the subject - why are you always avoiding my questions?
Quoting you "any idiot can clearly see" - then you shouldn't have responded my post in the first place as I'm NOT an idiot like yourself and I don't intend to guess what you're saying.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 As for Pearl Harbor, why don't you tell me why you said Pearl Harbor was not a sneak attack but a cowardly act(which made no sense and was kind of hilarious). It would make sense if it said Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack, therefore, it's a cowardly act.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
You don't know how to read I've caught you many times now. Don't try to cover your ass by saying you're a fast reader. I've explained to you why I thought Pearl Harbor was a cowardly act not a sneak attack many days ago and you try to make me repeat the same thing over and over. Guess what, I'm not an idiot like you.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 You can't seem to make a decent reply. And you're going to tell me how I've failed to understand what? It doesn't matter what you say. Telling me that Pearl Harbor was a cowardly act and not a sneak attack is already making me think that you're pretty retarded. What's the point of telling me that and where's the difference? I'm asking you similar questions because obviously, your previous answer wasn't good enough. Why don't you start replying directly to my statement?
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
I'm asking for the 5th time now - tell me how your Tibet example has anything to do with if China once rule Japan. Don't waste my time by talking about something else.
Where is the difference? - I can't believe you asked this kind of idiotic question - You can't see the difference between a sneak attack and a cowardly act and you have No shame to inform the public. Thanks for your honesty though.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Lol, how does Tibet has anything to do with it? You don't even remember what I brought up Tibet for? And that was merely "part" of my comment that you seemed to have "only" picked up and replied to. That was about how China treats another area they ruled unfairly and if Japan was ever ruled by China, they should have some kind of damage done just like Taiwan and Tibet.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
you're getting more ridiculous then ever.
Damage done just like Taiwan and Tibet? - Taiwan is one of the most developed regions in Asia and Tibetans have been enjoying a 50% increase of life expectancy since 1950. Why don't you go to Africa and have a look at those Sub-Saharan countries - it would be in their dreams to have those so-called damages done to them. Don't talk about Taiwan or Tibet if you have not seen them personally.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 You really live in the US? Ever see the news reporter and commentators openly talking bad about China when they were talking about Tibet and the Olympics? Quit looking away from the fact. And 50% increase in life expectancy? So what? They're not some zoo animals or some pets. Quit talking about life expectancies and tell me how China is satisfying the citizens in Tibet.
PS: You saw BOTH Taiwan and Tibet personally? I've only seen them in the news in the US.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
I'm tired of your comprehension problems. I said "Don't talk about Taiwan and Tibet if you have not seen them personally" - That tells you why I have the right to talk about them and you should shut up, Ok?
Yes, I've been to both of them and I used to live in Okinawa, Japan.
Quit talking about life expectancy??? - Why don't you move to Africa and enjoy dying at 40 years young? - What's the worst form of human right abuse? - Poverty is.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Listen dumbass, if the citizens there has any problem with the government like they've said on the interview on the US news then it's clearly a problem. Quit comparing with the worst. And now I can understand that you're a complete moron. How would I die earlier if I moved to Africa? I already know why some citizens there dies around that age. But can you explain how it'll shorten my life span by living in Africa? You really graduated from college?
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay I suddenly realize I've been having this conversation with a couch potato who has never been to Tibet or Taiwan and sitting in front of the TV all day and everyday -Sorry I don't watch TV and I like to see things personally. How would you die earlier? - even a 10 yo kid knows people could die ealier without food and clean drinking water- In fact those are the main reasons those folks over there live to 40 something only. I did graduate from college I'm sure you did not.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 And I realized that this is your desperate attempt to make a comeback. It's pretty much common sense for adults to watch the news article on the Internet, tv, and papers. Meaning keeping up with the current events. Here's a question you'll skip answering again. Can you explain how I'm some bum for watching Tibet on the news and Taiwan on the discovery channel? A little while back, you actually made decent replies but now you keep escaping from any topic that I think would expose you.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay You sick little kid stop peeing in public please the whole world knows I'm way ahead of you. Can I explain how you're some bum for watching Tibet on the news...? - Why do I want to waste my time on that kind of trash? Don't I have better things to do? - I don't need a worthless bumbass tell me what to do, period.
I never said there was anything wrong with watching TV. What I meant was I shouldn't have had a conversation with someone who has not personally seen Tibet or Taiwan,
purity5555 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
So I guess you're satisfied with my answers on how you would die earlier if you moved to Africa since i saw no response from you on that one - That's GOOOOOD !
Have you ever wondered why you asked those idiotic questions that even a little kid would know the answers?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Lol, there you go again showing your stupidity. I've been replying to you once every 2-4 days and here you are telling me how much spare time you got to waste on the internet. "since i saw no response from you on that one"(I replied to all three of your comments on the same day)? What a joke! Well the conversation here is getting pretty pointless for sure. All you do is dig your own grave each reply and it's getting worse and worse. Go ahead and keep dodging dodging my replies lol.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay Actually you're spending much more time here than I'm - As I told you it takes me less than a minute for a post so 3 posts would usually take me 2 to 3 minutes. That's not alot of time but I agree even that is a waste of time for talking to a worthless dumbass like you.
But look at the bright side, at least now you know how you would die earlier if you moved to Africa - I feel a little better for wasting my precious time on you.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Lol, hey dumbass, the conversation between you and me would have ended a long time ago if you didn't stalk me around and commented on at least 4 more videos. Again, you're the one that willingly started the conversation HERE. You can leave whenever you want to.
2, 3 minutes total? Lol, you sometimes give me replies like "since you didn't reply.....". This shows how much time you spend here and how often you check your inbox on youtube. Nice try.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Bozo, the whole world has seen you asked that dumb question "how you would die ealier if you moved to Africa". You still owe me a big THANK YOU.
Yeah, you got it, 2 or 3 minutes maximum...of course it's incomprehensible for an illiterate bitch like you.
Check my inbox on Youtube??? - Is that what you're doing all the time? - I don't go to my YT inbox that often but check my email couple times a day.
Why do you have so much time to waste on Youtube?, still unemployed?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 You failed big time on that reply. You're the one sending me back replies right back on that day. For the first time, your reply delayed a bit seeing the date you replied back. So not only do you have a fast computer, you read and type fast eh? Showing me how much you wrote tells me how much time you take. Put it all together and it seems like it takes more time than you're telling me but okay lol.
I still remember how you sent me 4-5 paragraphs worth of reply on one video.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
sending you replies right back on the same day? - what's wrong with that? - What exactly are you trying to say? You've been ripping farts recently, saying things that have no weight or substance at all..I guess you simply enjoy being a fart in the wind that will be quickly blown away and forgotten.
I sent you 4-5 paragraphs? - When and where ??? - even if I did, that would take 4 minutes maximum.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 I'm not trying to say that it's bad which is pretty obvious. And you just lied to me about how much time you take when you type. I just checked my mail and it's showing me how much time you took each reply. You're taking at least more than 20 minutes each reply. Is your computer slow? 2-3 minutes? Do you really watch the clock while typing? You sent me the reply 9 minutes after your last reply. Nice try.
PS: Are you using a laptop?
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Don't get tooooooo excited..sounds to me you're got a big fish or jerking off in your Mummie's undies.
Actually there was more than one hour between the 1st post and the PM, does it necessarily indicate much time I took for each post? - And any reason why couldn't I do something else in between? - try harder you dumbass.
Lied to you? - Is it because you've been lying all the time?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 When I said 9 minutes later, I was talking about short little message you sent me in private.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
actually that exactly tells me how much time you're spending here in YT: Day and night you're sitting in front of the computer screen waiting and watching email messages to come in, and counting how many minutes between each message...and assuming the senders would do nothing else in between messages because you're the center of everyone's universe...Why can't you get a life?
You're clearly showing the symtoms of mania. Get help before it's too late.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Lol, you failed big time on this one. People who's desperate with their comebacks always tries to copy what I say. If I call them dumb, they call me dumb, if I call them a bum, they call me a bum, etc. All I have to do is look at the side of the message to see the time which I haven't done. And it seems to me, that you keep talking about yourself. Well, I'll just see how much time you take on every reply from now on then.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
why don't you go read my previous post see if there is anything I copied what you said?
I take less than a minute for a post like this as I said.
Yeah, I know what you've been doing: day and night sitting in front of your computer and watching the emails to come in...don't you have a life ?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 Even if I replied couple of days later like usual, it'll still show how much time you took in the inbox. Lol, I hope you're not going to say that checking my inbox would make me a bum like you.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
I don't understand what the hell you're talking about here..did you read my previous post at all? And why the hell you're gonig off the topic again?
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 It sure seems to me that you keep taking my words though. Lol, I was the one that called you someone with no life because you showed me how much time you waste on the net. And now you're calling me a bum? For what? And a minute to reply? You mean a minute to read and write at the same time? Lol, although I don't believe you, how fast you reply still does not tell me if you're a bum or not though kid.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
@devilonthebay
Stop accusing I take your words you're taking mine everone knows. I take a minute to read and write? - you got it right for the 1st time in your life, congratulation!
Now the whole world knows you're a gutless shovelface bitch who has to block my PM.
You loser.
purity5555 1 year ago
@purity5555 So you definitely take a minute to read and write. Then I guess you have a very slow and cheap computer. Didn't I tell you before that I can tell how much time you take each reply? But if you claim that you're just doing "something" in the middle of typing in every single reply then okay, I believe you lol. I don't even see the need to argue over this childish subject anyway.
PS: "gutless shovelface bitch who has to block my PM" Lol! It's common sense to kick out a troll.
devilonthebay 1 year ago
Comment removed
askjiir 1 year ago
I hate this being used as propaganda, because this has nothing to do with politics, using his actions in politics dishonours him, he done it out of his kindness in his heart, and this is how he should always be remembered, that spark of humanity inside man
2Roo7ted 1 year ago
sorry sorry.....
dendekeden117 1 year ago
Sorry.
Welcome Tsuruga.
dendekeden117 1 year ago
Welcom to Tsuruga.
dendekeden117 1 year ago
And they never mention about disadvantages for them such as Korean army's slaughtering in Vietnam or, previous Korean goverment asked an annexation of Korea to Japan themselves. But it cant help to do that, cuz Korean goverment must hide the truth.
ikon1985ikon 1 year ago
How many times does dirty want to use pure words such as ass, bitch and sicko?Please tell me somebody. Btw, I recommend not to trust korean history, many of them are just created after WW2 to govern Korea by new government.Now it is commonsense.
ikon1985ikon 1 year ago
Sugihara could speak Russian. He asked Russian consul to issue visa for Jewish people.That's why Jewish people could go to Japan via Russia.
tochigikenmindayo 1 year ago
Sugihara-san has done too much, too much to help other people...
Cleric775 1 year ago
Sugihara is a true hero!
Kurtlane 1 year ago 15
A good and decent man. The Japanese had studied Jews and Judaism and knew the Germans were full of shit. They also knew in their hearts that eventually these racist bastards would be out to get all the non-whites if they treated other whites like this. Look what they did to the Baltic peoples, the Slavs and anyone else who got in their way. You Jew haters should remember, the Nazis exterminated your people as fast as they could also. 1/10 of Poles, 25 million in the USSR and that's just to start
nomadnametab 1 year ago