Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (214)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • In a time where honesty/integrity should trump all other attributes, I say if U can’t even pass the moral test, U shouldn’t even b allowed 2 run:

    NEWT cheated wife. I wanna know that something stood n his way when offered the opportunity to cheat/lie, his morals, God, something-nothing stood n his way, which 2 me means when the time comes, he’ll choose what he wants over everything else.

    MITT: record flip-flopperr. He’ll always choose what benefits him.

    How can u trust they'll do what they say?

  • This is "True Journalism" For this i say THANK YOU...

  • Ben Swan, thank you for being a true journalist and clearing this up for us. You are a hero.

  • Any 'real' change may be considered radical change to older folks, although they may not be old enough to remember when the constitution was written. They have become products of cold war/big military/trust your government or it's the end of the world propaganda. They'll submit to hypocrisy in exchange for the illusion that security will vanish by changing anything, when the opposite is really true. My family is my responsibility, what about yours?

  • Are the voters for establishment candidates revealing they haven't done even one day's research on America's (the world's) future? Most of my family is still voting Obama, but they have no youtube account and some not even a facebook account. Their only access is mainstream TV. People like my own family, I'm sorry to say, are the people that are going to allow the country to keep going in the direction it's going, mainly because they're afraid of radical change.

  • I don't remember how long it took for me to learn (through alternative media) about ron paul. In 2008 I remember believing the mainstream media saying he was somehow weird and unelectable, and I voted for McCain without giving it much thought or doing any research whatsoever. But this time around it may have taken one day or even a couple hours of research to realize the depth of hypocrisy.

  • I think I'm back in Kansas...Dorthy Dorthy...Fox News has got a soul ! Lordy Bee...

  • It's a lot easier to call RP a racist and stir up controversy than to hear 5 minutes of unbiased, objective journalism

  • Could you please check and see if and or what it will take for newt Grinch or Santorum to win by delegates. Seeing they are not on the ballets in 5 states. Thanks for your good work on reality check.

  • Next time he needs to pick a better editor. Everyone who had done their due diligence knew that Paul didn't write them.

  • BULLSHIT!

  • No excuses, his name is on the header. If he really wanted to disavow this crap he'd have taken legal action a long time ago.

  • @darkcowboyhero You gotta admit it's funny seeing the Paultards refusing to blame Ron Paul for the Ron Paul newsletters.

  • @darkcowboyhero Did you watch the video or just comment?  He already took responsibility saying he should have looked more careful at what was in the newsletter. You can't take legal action for not proof reading your own newsletter. He made a mistake 20 years ago and accidentally allowed racist commentaries. However, his voting record favors the black community.

  • @darkcowboyhero With who? The unnamed freelancers? Were you paying attention?

  • Interesting.

  • HOLLLLLLY SHITTTTTTTT

    k, can u guys dig deeper prz?

  • Black people DID freak out in 1992 when Rodney King, a lifelong trouble-maker, was brutally beaten. Don't tell me the riots were not racist. My grandfather lived in LA during the time and the Asian population was robbed, beaten and much more during those riots because blacks saw them as an easy target. NOT JUST WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACIST! Where was the scrutiny of Obama and his racist comments? Oh wait, presstitues only care about those who they PROP UP.

  • @heatman38 Your rant makes no sense Obama made no racist comments although the church he attended was racist. Racists should never have the opportunity to become president just like felons shouldn't vote. Ron Paul's disingenuous political policies about putting the responsibility on the state instead of the federal government is the kind of thing that will strip American citizens of their most basic human rights.

  • @GeneralInsomnia mmmm. Too much insomnia for clear thinking, perhaps, or maybe it is you who is any disingenuous.

    Human rights are universal- no state law or country constitution can overrule those. Decentralized power is in the core of the liberal revolutions that brought you whatever range of freedom you enjoy at the moment.

  • @Margolpsbiegh So by your statement you think Afghanistan is full of liberal freedom? Human rights are not universal they are subjective. That's why they constantly change over periods of years and when you move to different areas of the world. Ron Paul seeks to undermine the social and economic freedoms we have attained within the past 50 years under the guise of constitutionalism. Ron Paul is an creationist fundie who is against gay marriage and abortion.

  • @GeneralInsomnia What does it matter if he is a creationist who is against gay marriage and abortion if he doesn't believe the federal government has any say in defining what is taught, who gets married, and what you do with your body? What social and economic freedoms does he wish to undermind? He would give you more social freedoms by repealing the PATRIOT ACT. He would give you more economic freedoms by removing regulatory roadblocks.

  • @Brett9897 Because no politician has ever lied before. Clearly when a politician says hes completely opposed to something and votes against it numerous times hes obviously going to completely ignore it when he reaches a position of extreme power. 

  • @GeneralInsomnia He has never voted for the federal government to define marriage as 1 man and 1 woman. He has never voted for the federal government to require creationism to be taught. He has never voted for the fed govt to make abortion illegal. Not sure where you are getting your information from. The only time he has voted against your views is when bills were introduced that required the fed govt to fund those views. The fed govt should not give out funds in support of any views.

  • @Brett9897 Remind me never to argue against Rontards it's all LALALALALA that never happened with you guys. Ron Paul seeks to remove US citizens of some of their constitutional rights despite his thinly veiled lies.

  • @GeneralInsomnia So you are admitting you have no facts thus the need to resort to name calling. I am fine with you admitting that you lost the debate. Have a good day.

  • @Brett9897 Good job dismissing my claims with your easy excuse. Therefore admitting you are weaseling your way to failure in this very silly INTERNET debate. I'm more annoyed with Ron Paul fans then Ron Paul himself I'm currently arguing with like 3 of you guys right now one of which is a blatant racist. So sorry if my arguments don't meet your wonderful standard of not hurting your feelings. Quite frankly fuck these corrupt politicians like Ron Paul, Obama, etc. They promise change and we lose.

  • @GeneralInsomnia " putting the responsibility on the state instead of the federal government is the kind of thing that will strip American citizens of their most basic human rights." That's hilarious.

  • @JiveTwankle Context is important. Gay marriage should be mandated above a state level. A little like no slavery and women voting but then again Ron Paul isn't into the civil rights act either.

  • @GeneralInsomnia "Gay marriage should be mandated above a state level."

    No, the state should have no say in marriage_

  • @evandonghue2 So you don't support Ron Paul then? Because he wants it to be decided by the state. BTW why did you say "no, the state should have no say in marriage"? I mean that's exactly what I said. T_T

  • @GeneralInsomnia No, the gov't, federal, nor state should have any say in marriage_ That is RP's position_ But if faced with either federal or state regulation of marriage I choose state, that way there is room for differing opinions on the matter, and people can vote with their feet_ Of course all this is moot because our dollar has lost 97% of its value in 3 generations, america is fighting wars around the world, and we live in a police state_ All of these issue's RP is correct_

  • @evandonghue2 The value of the dollar has decreased because the country is no longer one of the most industrial and because we spend more money then we have. Ron Paul is not going to fix the economy and going to the gold standard would be just as symbolic as using paper money. Ron Paul does want it to be a state decision. Gay marriage is not a non-issue it is a question of equality. Gay marriage should without a doubt be a constitutional freedom. Only religious zealots say otherwise.

  • @GeneralInsomnia "going to the gold standard would be just as symbolic as using paper money."

    Then whats ur problem with doing it>? Truth is we don't support a "gold standard" we do support market money over gov't monopolized money_ We want currencies to compete and let consumers choose which one(s) they want_ Look at RP's Free Currency and Competition Act, its short, then u will better understand our monetary policy_

  • @evandonghue2 I'm obviously arguing with someone who hasn't a clue how currency works. Ron Paul's claims are actually the crazy ramblings of a Propertarian.

  • @GeneralInsomnia "I'm obviously arguing with someone who hasn't a clue how currency works."

    No u are talking to a licensed financial professional w/ a fortune 500 Co_

  • Comment removed

  • @GeneralInsomnia "The value of the dollar has decreased because the country is no longer one of the most industrial and because we spend more money then we have."

    Look, u clearly do not understand the complexities of the market, and why its failing, u are grasping at pieces of facts that sound regurgitated to me_ As a financial professional I will tell u the business cycle, created by the money monopolists at the fed is the heart of america's economic problems, RP understands this_

  • @evandonghue2 A financial professional who spells "you" as "u". Show me some real facts next time please don't just reply with blatant lies about Ron Paul's position.

  • @GeneralInsomnia " Show me some real facts"

    At least have the intellectual curiosity to understand our position on monetary policy_ Read the Competition in Currency Act, to at least understand what u so easily/arrogantly/ignorantly disregard_ U cannot argue against something u do not know, outside of what a 3rd party told u is RP position, why not instead read it for urself_ At least I take a position, all u do is call people names_

  • @GeneralInsomnia "Gay marriage is not a non-issue"

    Agreed and I never called it a non issue_ It is just a relatively insignificant one when faced with the deaths of a million iraqis,or the destruction of our currency, or the police state/drug war_

  • @evandonghue2 Police states are an issue but should we have an uneducated racist creationist who disagrees with homosexuality as the leader of our entire country. Actually you did call it a non-issue "wedge issue". Stop bullshitting okay.

  • @GeneralInsomnia "Police states are an issue"

    So who running for president do u support that will oppose the american police state>?

  • @evandonghue2 Hmm. Really I'd have to wait for a third party candidate.I'm not sure what motives Ron Paul has for his stated plans because "constitutional freedom" is not a part of it. It seems like every 4 years everyone forgets that EVERY politician even their favorite politician lies for fame and money.

  • @GeneralInsomnia "Really I'd have to wait for a third party candidate."

    No, what I said was u should get ur information from the source instead of relying on the media (third party source, not political party)_ I don't graft issues onto my political opponents, i try to understand them, from their perspective_

  • @GeneralInsomnia "Ron Paul has for his stated plans because "constitutional freedom" is not a part of it."

    So ur for silver and gold being issued as money>? Like it says in the constitution>? Btw where, in the constitution does it say anything about marriage>? This is not a gov't issue, everything not mentioned in the constitution is the designated to the states_ 10th amendment_

  • @evandonghue2 I'm wondering, do you know your history? The Constitution isn't exactly a recent document. "This is not gov't issue, everything not mentioned in the constitution is the designated to the states_ 10th amendment_" Are you able to even breath? We ratify the constitution for things all the time. If there is nothing in the constitution about the right to marry your gender why not ratify the constitution?

  • Comment removed

  • Oh my God who cares what he said about racism it's not a big deal anymore white people calm down. There is nothing wrong with telling the truth and being honest he is extremely honest man he would tell you what he meant and why he pt it.

  • Mainstream Media not doing their homework? How shocking.....NOT !!!!!!!

  • MEDIA TRYING TO SPREAD AS MANY LIES AS POSSIBLE. GOOD THING AT LEAST ONE STATION IS SPEAKING THE TRUTH... I BET ALL OTHER NEWS ORGS STILL WILL BE ASKING ABOUT THE SAME NEWSLETTER.. SPREAD THE TRUTH RON PAUL NOT RASCIST, DON'T BELIEVE THE BULL.

  • @piffgambit why did ron paul defend the racist newsletters?

  • @alsdfalsdvjoen If you've been paying attention genius he didn't defend them.. he disavowed them and explained that he did not write them .. this guy proved that he didn't write them .. so why would he defend something that was A.) was racist and B.) He didn't write ??.. ~DERP~

  • @ZoneTelevision he dint do that until 2001(kinda)

  • @alsdfalsdvjoen Ron Paul defended bits of conspiracy theories in them, one of which involving the first attack on WTC. There was an article interview in about 96 which was poorly worded and very vague in what they we're getting across, it was a semantics game. He has disavowed the iota of ridiculous racism in the newsletters multiple times, he's in the middle of a huge campaign, I would assume he has more important things to worry about than 20 year old ghost writer articles.

  • @Ninety9Soulz he dint disavow them until 2001 he was asked about them before that... but lets not research ron paul lets just go by what he says he has always said... not what he said.

  • @alsdfalsdvjoen I already researched it a few months ago but can't remember the details, I'll have to go looking again. I was actually on the verge of not supporting him anymore until this video anda few other things.

  • wRong Paul the Racist!

  • If this is the only "dirt" anyone can come up with, I know I'm voting for the right man. HOT DAMN RON PAUL 2012

  • And I think the name your looking for was James Blackwell, last I heard he works for Forbes, someone went to the trouble to upload every newsletter and with the bylines to basically debunk this fraud by the media and Kirchick. Too bad Ron Paul didn't go to Wright's church then all would have been ignored~

  • Ron Paul has someone write a few mean things in a newsletter and ABC and all the rest of them bring it up over and over, yet Obama sits in a racists church for 20 years and not a word of that making him unelectable, a total media fraud, they slant it and blow up what they choose to focus on, if we are talking about racism Obama's far more one as well as the progressives in the Republican party that want war on drugs against black people, Paul seems less a racist than O!

  • He keeps sayin that the articles contain this and that but he hasn't read one of them....the media is putting wayyyyyyy too much effort in destroying Ron Paul...he must be The One!! I dont believe the election is real but if I did I would support Ron Paul

  • Seems like a reasonable piece of reporting to me.

  • This is a neat piece of propaganda. They make the newsletters sound like a few bad ones in a pile with mostly neat ones spanning over the decades. The truth is James Kirchick does not know about all the newsletters. Because Ron Paul did not release his archive to the public. The ones that where found where in public a library archive. Ron Paul is being very hush-hush about what he wrote then. I wonder why. Just come clean.

  • Google Dallas Morning News. They wrote of it back in 96.

  • Someone forgot to report the Ron Paul himself defended the racist content back in 96 saying they were out of context. Now he's saying if didn't write them. Even if if didn't, He's the boss!

  • @Calapooyas Do you have the transcript of that interview?

  • Why won't these neo-cons leave this Country? They hate it so why do they continue to try to destroy it? Vote for the only honest man running to be President. Vote for Ron Paul please.

  • AND THIS IS ALL THE MAINSTREAM ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA CAN COME UP WITH ON PAUL .. AND ALL OVER THESE SO-CALLED COUNTERFEIT CONSERVATIVE RADIO AND TV SHOWS THEY CONTINUE TO PARROT THESE STRAWMAN ATTACKS.

  • MAYBE IT'S TIME THE MEDIA SHUTS THE HELL UP BECAUSE NOBODY IS LISTENING TO YOUR BASELESS PROPAGANDA ANYMORE ...

  • Wow is this local news? I wish my local news was this in depth. You would never find journalism like this on Fox News or MSNBC.

  • I breathed a sigh of relief when I heard this. I have a more comprehensive view of what really happened. It seems less than 1% of all the newsletters are offensive. And offensive articles aren't sprinkled throughout the entire output, but rather occur in consecutive months, hinting that one person wrote them one after another.

    After seeing this report, I believe Ron Paul and I am more confident in my support of him.

  • @kristoferfir I can see how these articles could have been snuck in, considering that paul wasn't a full time editor (politician, physician), I can understand his blunder and see now that he was scrutinized unfairly for them. If paul was elected president, I think we can rest assured that he would devote himself fully to this management position.

  • Thanks for breaking it down! I wish journalists always reported this way!

  • I feel like Ron Paul has been old for a very long time...

  • This guy is like the last real journalist! Actually investigating stories instead of just rehashing popular opinion.

  • Great video. Just correct the spelling mistake in the title.

  • Now this is what journalism is about, not the crap that comes from CNN, MSN, FOX et all.

    Good Job!

  • @illusions77 crap that comes from CNN, MSN, FOX et all??? The entire "FOX" Reality Check news piece is based on a "MSN" headline article. So, Yea. I am not sure you have a leg to stand on with that comment, or why 14 people think your response even deserves a thumbs up.

  • @illusions77 This video comes from FOX.

  • Great Job!!!

  • Wow, Ben Swann.. The only name in journalism I'll ever remember for the rest of my life.

  • I can't remember the last time I saw/heard this kind of Journalism! Great Work Ben Swann!

  • Awesome!

  • THIS IS CALLED REAL JOURNALISM, thank you Ben Swann

  • This is only first half the @nd half reveals the author jim b powell

  • The only sad thing about this is that you'll never see great journalism like this on major mainstream news stations.

  • ben swann like a boss...from one OHIO-an to another..thanks ben..ron paul 2012

  • Google "ben swann examiner" to read an interesting article about Ben Swann the journalist. The man is a true self-made success story.

  • Ben Swann deserves to have his own nightly national news program!

    "Our debt is unsustainable and is destroying our future. Our president and Congress continue to pass bills that erode the Bill of Rights in the name of security. The Constitution is in shambles, and the news media is content to cover nonsense and info-tainment." -- Ben Swann

  • Now THAT is journalism. Can you even imagine if our 'mainstream' media cared about facts and getting to the bottom of things like this instead of spinning everything in propaganda!? They are so far from it that it's a slap in the face as to how bad it is.

  • Ty again for posting! Ron Paul 2012!

  • But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionje­ws.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  • How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

  • Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

  • Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

  • It's just like when you watch paranormal shows on TV. There's a disclaimer in the beginning that says not everybody affiliated with the network agrees with what the show is about. Same goes for publication like this.

  • I have been following R. Paul since the 90's. I did not receive his news letters, but listened to his recorded telephone updates every Monday. I never heard even the slightest hint of anything racial in these updates. If R.Paul doesn't win the republican nomination, we will be stuck with Obama for 4 more years. ( if we can last that long ) - I will not vote for anyone other than R.Paul - Republican neocons are just as bad as liberal Democrats. None of them abide by the constitution.

  • Ben is the ONLY TRUE Journalist out there! TY for the TRUTH! It's sad that People are so happy to hear truth because there is not enough out there.

    

  • Nice to see the truth

  • We need to bring honest people like Ben Swann to a higher position in this world.

  • Ben Swann for speaker of the House! Add Ben to Your facebook and twitter account. Show Ben some Love.

  • This guy is a badass journalist! I like this!

  • The amount of mainstream media manipulation against Ron Paul is crazy..

    Watch "Veteran interviews gets censored by CNN" after he clearly shows his respect and agrees with RP's ideas.. The ellite is petrified that Ron Paul would get a chance to win the precidency, and we all know that the Utah elections were rigged..

    All I gotta say is Ron Paul for presdient 2012!!

  • you gotta add more tags to this video. sometimes view counts are all about tags. allow more people to stumble upon this video

  • This video has to spread!

  • Unbiased journalism, I miss it.

  • Lame story. Why not investigate something important like the alleged 757 that hit the pentagon over ten years ago?

  • You know, even if Dr. Paul had written everything in the newsletters, it would still pale in comparison to the dishonesty and corruption of the other candidates running right now.

  • Comment removed

  • Great reporting!!!

  • Awesome reporting. Ron Paul 2012!!

  • NEWT GINGRICH BEHIND THESE NEWS LETTER ATTACKS?

    James Kirchick who keeps publishing these articles about the News Letters is a “fellow” at the NEO-CONservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) where NEWT is a “distinguished adviser” at the DC-BASED THINK TANK behind the current campaign slandering rival candidate Ron Paul as a “racist” and “anti-Semite.”

    FDD has also received grants from the U.S. State Department.

    EXPLAIN THIS NEWT!!!!!

    DR. RON PAUL 2012!!!

  • @PsychStudent85 NEWT behind these attacks, wouldn't shock me! The FAT BLOATED FUCK says he wants to run a clean campaign will absolutely have others do his hit pieces for him.

    The term "THINK TANK" always makes me cringe because the only "THINKING" done there is how to effectively spread their PROPAGANDA!

  • @monkor002, Thanks for allowing me to clarify that I do actually get it. I just think it could be more concise for the teaming lemming masses who are so used to the, (dare I use a a Rush reference?) "Drive-by media" that they need a diagram. We're on the same team buddy! ;-)

  • this is a joke

    1. who gets to decide what is considered racist

    2. who care if it's not Ron Paul's words

    3. sad that they care about newsletters from decades ago

  • @verveinfortcollins What we thought we knew before this report is a joke. People believe anything the mainstream media say. The msm knows this so they don't need to go into in depth reports.

  • Impressive

  • See ya at the FEMA camps mBen!!

  • Good work Ben...I've was going to research the topic myself...but u did a nice job for me!

  • He's good but i think it needs to be simplified a little more. I'd like to see a few more graphics, say, a time line and some kind of visual to show how few of the newsletters were offensive and something to show how easy it would be for a freelance writer to get something like that published "under the radar."

  • @Gzushed

    There's far more important policies and issues at hand than hunting down some bigot who wrote racist editorials.

    The Federal Reserve, Iran, Healthcare, Unemployment, Corruption.

    And yet all people want to talk about is some news letter that has for more than a decade been disavowed, confirmed not to have been written by Paul, and Paul still taking responsibility as the publisher and possible negligence of the content.

    If that isn't good enough, enjoy war with Iran.

  • @Gzushed It was pretty easy to follow. All of the racist newsletters were from when Paul went back to being an OB/GYN between 1988 and 1996. It's pretty easy to follow what the guy is saying and I think it's pretty damn funny you're asking somebody to draw you a picture. No wonder most media is put out at a 5th grade level.

  • @Monkor002 Ron Paul left congress in 1985 to run as senator, unsuccessful. From 85-88 he was making a presidential bid, unsuccessful. According to this news source, he went back to being and OB/GYN after he left Congress 1985. According to this news source all 9 racist documents were publish in 1990's-1992. It is pretty easy to follow. But even so, not something to form an opinion about until you read all the newsletters yourself, with all authors bylines.

  • Comment removed

  • I say again: Fuck! Why doesn't this guy have an anchor chair on a major news network.

  • @dmoneyas24 he tells the truth..

  • Great coverage

  • The the guilty party please step forward. Our Country is depending on you! Ron Paul is innocent and he is not a liar.

  • Ben Swann is amazing!! Keep up the great work!!! Ron Paul 2012.

  • This guy needs to get paid what the loser talking heads in Wasington and New York are getting paid. He's actually a journalist that works to get alll the facts. Oh, i forgot, the major media doesn't want people like that. Great job Ben.

  • This is LOCAL FOX NEWS. Unlike the MSM. This is REAL journalism! Ron Paul 2012

  • Refreshing to see some objective journalism, recently the knives have well and truly been out for Ron Paul. It would be interesting if Lew Rockwell had something to do with letters and might explain why Paul has been less than forthcoming about who wrote them.

  • Fox news doing real journalism. Whats the world coming to.

  • riiiiiiiiiiiiiight and why do they have his name on them again?? either he cosigns or he's a dumb ass

  • @maile321 Have fun with Obama, SOPA, NDAA EEA,PIPA. and yet another war with Iran..

  • This is why local news media is better than national news media. Either the national news media is biased, has an agenda, or is completely inept. Ben Swann proves this by doing some actual journalism.

    So I want to know, which is it? Is CNN biased, do they have an agenda, or are they simply inept at doing their job? Id like a report on that.

  • If we can get this out, then there's nothing stopping Ron

  • @cobraboy1100 Agree, we must spread this video!!

    Start by like, favourite and share!!

  • I'm confused. This is fox isn't it? Maybe there are two persons who will lose their job quite soon. :/

  • @Knolib It's local news which is much different then the mainstream news you usually see talking about big topics.

  • Was that a hint of what JOURNALISM is about? wait now this can't be right! where's the bias in this report! where is the agenda behind this video!..

  • Great job Reality Check and thanks for the upload SaveOurSoverignty3!! Great to finally get this cleared up. RON PAUL 2012!

  • RON PAUL 2012

  • real journalism--a opposed to CNN!

  • How do we get this message out there?

  • @roland20002000 Spread this video to famous media people :P who aren't with the bankers ofc.

  • Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum were pledged 7 delegates each in Iowa. The caucus was a 3-way tie. RON PAUL 2012!!!

  • Ron Paul is the man!

  • im so depressed by the outcome of the iowa caucus

  • @rnmchl9 We made progress. And we won an equal number of delegates.... and will probably get most since our RP people know how to play the game better.

    Yes, a win and the press attention would have been better... but fear not. This fight is not over.

  • @rnmchl9 Don't be..we won. the less people running the more focused the debates become.. this is a long run and we vanquished some status quo bobble heads the coming debates are going to get better and better till Obama and Paul are on the stage debating the future of this nation. Will we be the Client State to Intrenational Corporations or will we be a Free and Independent Republic.

  • @rnmchl9 no need to feel depressed cos the iowa caucas was all about delegates.

    the top 3 including paul all had 6 delegates.

    so it was actually a tie.

    i for one thinks the election was rigged some how.

    santorum will not last.this is a 2horse race between ron paul/mitt romney

  • And after they've been well known for 22 years.