I-Debate 10/10/07 - USLS v. UNO-R - Free Debate Round Part 3

[sashina2004]

shitty dumb judges..

[tADjONG041186]

haha....grmmar?..maybe spelling bt thats nt the case her shithead.....ths is the internt..again read all my comments firts rather than jst rep to 1 of it..u knw instead of minding other ppls spelng y dnt u mind abt the debate wer ur lasalian team r presntng fictions..

[tADjONG041186]

haha....grmmar?..maybe spelling bt thats nt the case her shithead.....ths is the internt..again read all my comments firts rather than jst rep to 1 of it..u knw instead of minding other ppls spelng y dnt u mind abt the debate wer ur lasalian team r presntng fictions..

[trina1is1dying]

in my point of view the lasallians were totally pwnd by uno-r.

[thedebater0888]

Oh my, what a very disorganized debate! How can they understand each other's side when they speak all at the same time? Shame!!! Shame!!!!!!

[bullseye527]

fiction won over science!just based on how many words per second you have....this is purely a debate of english grammar not a point of argument in a logical way of thinking...judges wake up!!

[tADjONG041186]

nO OFFENCE To anybody. But I hope the judges also have a backgorud or even studied genetic engineering because this topic is too big just fof anybody else.

[tADjONG041186]

Then they also said that people behind the genetic engineering is the one who is endangering "Humanity" and the UNO-R responed that the person is the one who is at fault not the process of Genetic engineering. I think they should consider the details not how talkative you are that will make you the winner.

[tADjONG041186]

For example, La Sallians said that we endangered humanity because we could alter human emotions or personality, where UNO-R responded genetic engineering is removing genes that are harmful to the human body.

[tADjONG041186]

How did La Salle won? I am not pro UNO-R but they are the deserving winner. La Sallians may have presented a lot of points but most of their statements are weak if not fictional. UNO-R occasionally responded slowly to the La Sallian's statement, but how can they if it is a makeup statement? Also How come it is 4-1 because in the "Interpellation Round", no doubt that La Sallians lost in that round?

[kcrack17]

Lasallians won because they know how to deliver their points well. its not enough to have facts, its the manner of presenting it

[tADjONG041186]

well its nt even "facts" as i said its fictional...period

[kcrack17]

UnoR may also have good facts, they just have to present it well enough to win. What's the use of having great ideas if you can't express it

[tADjONG041186]

u know its better f u hve few ideas as long they r reliable n true.....than having a LOT of fictional facts...Am I right??

[kcrack17]

but the problem is both of them have ideas. they wouldn't be in a debate if they didn't. the number of ideas do not matter now. what's the use of having 1million ideas if you can't express it? The point is not on either who has great facts of ideas, it is a way the ideas are said or expressed. i hope you get the point. sigh* why am i even arguing with you. there's no use... the judges have given their decision, i suppose we aren't superior than them... hehehe

[tADjONG041186]

i dnt care if u hve millions of ideas n u presented them well...the point is their ideas r fictional...as i said it doesnt matter f they presented all it well bt if it is all lies or fictional then u shudnt hve won even d enemy or the other team presented only 1 idea as long it is true and reliable....in the world of science truth is the basis not fictional...i think u r the one ho dont get it....

[tADjONG041186]

1 other problem the judges r dumb as well...they didnt officiate it to the point to be fair cos other team shud be the 1 presentng facts bt they didnt stop the lasallians to shut up n w8...........u know judges their on the debate i bet dont hve any background for that matter...they r their for the show....

[kcrack17]

hahaha u sound funny. i am just so tempted to answer so i'll give in:

could you pls watch d video again? if the ideas of lasal are sooo unreliable and grossly untruthful, then why CAN'T uno-r make us believe that? why CAN'T they even defend that? ...being in debate requires u to be convincing... i hope you get a chance to join a debate soon so u'l find out... I hope that has educated you somehow... G'luck!ü

[tADjONG041186]

haha..thats y their r judges..they dont nid to be convince they nid to know the truth separate fictions than facts..bt as as i said....the judges r dumb...period.......audiences might belive it bt judges must be there to judge the truth and nt to be one the ppl like u to be convince..its nt how you convince ppl its jst simply stating d truth..u knw ho like to convince ppl its d politicians...so ppl like u cud be convince by a student like them its a shame..i think ur d 1 ho nids "G'luck!ü"

[kcrack17]

bwahahaha you really need to learn debating... learning spelling and grammer will also be a plus. wahahahaha

[tADjONG041186]

dis is d intrnt asshole...not a fuckng spellng bee."grammer"?...fuck u r d 1 nid to learn..dumbass!

[kcrack17]

ur right, reading some of your comments prove u something... that you really are sooo uneducated. manners my dear... were u not taught of it as well? poor you... btw, thank for providing me entertainment, this is a stress reliever for me. =D

[tADjONG041186]

sorry fr d words ive said....bt abt dis debate thng im nt takng back anytthng cos f u lokk other comments they r most agreeing w/ me

[kcrack17]

well, we are entitled to our individual opinions...

I wish u well, G'luck!ü

[tADjONG041186]

ur still up......r u in phil??

[tADjONG041186]

pls watch my other comments below cos ive written a lot of fictional points abt lasallians...i dnt nid 2 watch it again maybe u do..

[tADjONG041186]

How did La Salle won the debate? I am not pro UNO-R but I think they are the deserving winner. They lay down sensible proof compare to the La Sallians. How could it be 4-1 because in the "Interpellations round" their is no doubt La Salle lost that round? UNO-R maybe not sometimes quick to respond to the La Sallians' statement, but how can they respond in a makeup statement? Also La Sallian's statements or proofs are weak, if not fictional.

[mygirl078]

crush nung mga Tga UNO-R ung mataba heheh kinikilig sila hahhaha yehey crush nila ung mataba hahaha

[gurlrizcha]

im one of the debaters ng uno-r.hindi kmi kinikilig noh.natatawa kmi coz he's super funny. hehe.if you were there, sskit ang tiyan mo.