lol theres no conspiracy but u guys need to respect the dead, or were they just captured and sent to naboo buy a teleporter. damn u conspiracy theirorists are fucking idiots
Eyewitnesses= homeless guys living in the gas station that we payed $ to have them say what we want them to say. The video of the plane hitting the building isn't conclusive enough.
What we have here is an expert in speculation, and also an expert on what is supposed to happen when a plane crashes(he thinks). I speculate that Mickey Mouse was flying the plane. And what about the people that were on that flight that died and their families buried them? A simple case of witness protection for 100+ people all at once? Better call the actors from In Plain Sight they might have some information on these cases. You are a horrible speculator sir.
The Shills/Trolls/Disinfo (S.T.Ds) on here are under total control from their Handlers/Orderers/Masters/Owners (H.O.M.Os). Basically the HOMOs spread their STDs to try and infect free speech about 9/11 and stop people from spreading the truth, about 9/11 begging ppl to shut up, i wont do it, its so obvious and blatant, yet another false flag slaughtering 3000 innocent ppl, its disgusting, and the perps will burn in hell for it!
@davis4037 not possible. Think about how big a 747 is, if it slid into a column collision damage would happen period. Regardless of how strong a building is impact damage from a plane that size would still be evident.
The Shills/Trolls/Disinfo (S.T.Ds) on here are under total control from their Handlers/Orderers/Masters/Owners (H.O.M.Os). Basically the HOMOs spread their STDs to try and infect free speech about 9/11 and stop people from spreading the truth, about 9/11 begging ppl to shut up, i wont do it, its so obvious and blatant, yet another false flag slaughtering 3000 innocent ppl, its disgusting, and the perps will burn in hell for it!
The shill known as MrAwsome514 has been commenting on multiple 9/11 videos claiming his grandfather died on Flight 77, that his neighbor's dad died on Flight 77, and that he is a 767 Pilot.
You could please label these things order? If this is 1 of 8, where is 2 of 8, 3 of 8 so my idiot friends will watch them. One told, "There's just that one, I'm not watching all of them if I can't find the next one." Not helping by not labeling them. Thanks.
A civilian plane can easily be catched on a cam, the planes crashed on the twin towers they were clearly shown as planes eventhough they were at a flying high speed (not on the ground but in the air), and still they were identified as planes from every angle and cam, but in the Pentagon it's not identified at all.
pentagon is an important gov building, so confiscating film is normal, blast proof absolutely means that they are impact proof, columns could have theoretically survived even if outer walls did not, most explosions go up and out, a plane that explodes (due to fuel) is going to be in smaller pieces than just impact crashes, foundations are really strong compared to rest of building, distances can be off, official reports dont always have correct details, (cont...)
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
How many of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's 1600+ architectural and engineering professionals have experience in structural engineering, high rise construction, or controlled demolition?
What did Hani Hanjour’s flight instructors have to say about his flying ability?
Who was Ali Mohamed and what is his relationship with Osama Bin Laden and the CIA?
"Although these windows were blast proof, it is not reasonable to suggest they weren't 757-proof"
Why not? How are you basing this claim? Got any calcs to prove it? Manufacturer's cut sheets? UL test results? Are you a window manufacturer? Myth Busters, at least? I'm tired of hearing unfounded claims on how the damage "should've occurred" based on nothing but speculation from people without the slightest clue of physics, chemistry, structural engineering, etc.
@SolerMotorsports Thousands of Engineers have spoken out against 9/11.. look up engineers for 9/11 truth.. but the whole window comment was stupid, I agree.. smh.
@SolerMotorsports well at least there should have been a body or two or some plane parts? but NO just a hole and a war! we americans are FUCKING STUPID! and fat if i might add!
@SolerMotorsports the day before 9/11 it was announced we had lost 2.3 trillion dollors?just disappeared? the the part of the pentagon that was hit and all the people who were killed had the information to the truth behind where that money is! oh well.. and on 9/12 there was supposed to be a investigation on the election that bush won! well we couldent be questioning the president right after a terrorist attack on THE GREAT US OF "A"!!
No plane? This was found: 757 rim, 757 turbine, blue 757 seats, fuselage wreckage with "American" logo visible, Rolls Royce RB211 engine parts, structural wreckage matching Boing paint primer schemes, 60+ bodies matching the passenger and flight crew list and returned to the families. How about disproving this before you make uneducated gueses about the impact
It is trully shocking that people are really buying the official story. I think americans should really learn how to build skyscrapers because they seem to fall even with few small office fires like building 7. What is the pentagon made out of? Is must be some strong stuff because it makes beoing 757 dissapear. The official story is a lie. I love america and have been there many times before and planning to go back in just a few months but dont believe everything you are told by the goverment.
@kolbrunhelga1 Well, the Pentagon IS built stronger than anything else but it does not make planes disappear. It just shatters them to pieces. Debris from the plane was all over the place. And you might be right about us having to learn to build skyscrapers: the chief civil engineer that designed the WTC towers said that they thought of all kinds of storms and natural disasters but the thought of a plane hitting the towers and the resulting jet fuel fire never even crossed their minds.
@SolerMotorsports Every hijacked planes literally disappeared until they searched every parts one by one. The WTC collapsings and the plane collisions have unique behaviour in the whole history of collapsings and collisions. No such happenings ever happened, now this all happened in one incident. Oh and the both 767's flew toward computer secure rooms at the WTC. And then the timeline of the Pentagon pictures show more strange stuff. At least this all prooves something is not right.
@SolerMotorsports How do you know how the Pentagon works when impacted by a plane? Show me your proof because I've never seen a plane hit anything without having large chunks of debris somewhere. The Space Shuttle Colombia had larger debris than they found at the pentagon for fucks sake.
9/11=Insurance Fraud by Jew Bankers! Just search: "pull it" Building #7 for all the Moronic Lemmings, with there Head in the Dirt, & there Dick in Hollywood! I laugh when Ur in a FEMA camp, bitch ass Bildaberger lovers. Fuk the United Police States! infowars.com
Highly recommended that folks watch all 8 parts. First-rate. Step by step you can see, listen, judge for yourself. If the plane did not hit the Pentagon, the NTSB flight path claim points to where (let's say) "they wanted" bomb-damage done. What was in there? Oh---the offices looking into $2.3 trillion of fraud. (Rummy at his nomination-hearing on C-Span laughed when asked to promise an accounting by Sen. Byrd). And Bldg. 7 had the ongoing Enron files. Hope this work nails the criminals.
has any one ever considering the rapid heating of the jet fuel igniting, cracking the metal and then increased temptreture softning steel further weakening it ?
See now took me 20 seconds to come up with and write .....bullshit comes easy
Absence of evidence is not, in itself, evidence. If anything needed covering up on 9/11 it would have been the firing of one or more air-to-air missiles on approach to the Pentagon. But there is no evidence of this. Comparing surviving parts of wreckage is ludicrous as each crash is uniquely affected by its own situational chaos.
Consider this theory: A small group of terrorists commandeered 4 planes and flew 3 of them into buildings.
@HighwaySage lol, since when did a fire take down a building that big? I mean, honestly, show me another instance of a skyscraper falling in it's own print from a fire. go for it, you can even look at skyscrapers that were burning for days if you want.....
---You may have seen many mice running about which have escaped being eaten by hawks. Does this mean that hawks don't eat mice? ---
They decided to let the building burn and it failed. Metal, when very hot, bends like wet spaghetti. But let's just agree to disagree. I doubt either of us will be convinced by the other in this case. Be well.
@HighwaySage convincing people of physics isn't my main priority now, and 911 is old and people will believe almost anything the media tells them, whatever. good luck, ron paul 2012 btw.
@HighwaySage ya, I'm helping out in anyway I can with Ron's campaign because the biggest issue that I stand with him is his anti war stance, I have ALOT of friends over in afghanistian and iraq and most of them are asking why they are there and are pissed for risking there lives for some special interests. and I've lost to many friends over there already, we need to come home. and no other candidate (rep. or dem.) will follow through on getting our troops home.
@1blackdeath51501 When did you last see a jet airliner slam into a skyscraper at full speed? To suggest this is an impact a tall building built in the 70s could absorb is totally ludicrous. Get over it. In 10 years you have got nowhere with this madness except to be thought fools by the general population.
@3558035580 no, the media is now considered the general population? American's are such sheep, even people from other countries can't believe your stupidity and ignorance, and how is it possible that building 7 went down, or how the pentagon survived, except for the branch that was put for an investigation for goldman sachs. that's what I want to know. you're stuidity is laughable.
@1blackdeath51501 if you arent from the us why do you even have an opinion here? nobody cares what you have to say really... oh and nice spelling "stuidity"
@1blackdeath51501 What you want to know is how to fit awkward facts into your pathetic world view. You just can't accept that muslim fanatics killed thousands of innocent people so you concoct this ridiculous conspiracy theory.
@3558035580 yes because the insane crazy terrorists (LOL) could of killed 3 times as much 2 hours later, or that building 7 fell because it wasn't feeling it that day ya know? your stupidity is laughable.
@camoman35 Not really and no i dont play COD only you would know about ''COD'' because your a nerd..and 2nd they make missiles that dont cause as much damage to a building but enough to do damage but not necessarily destroy it completely..This is why they made LGM are you retarted??
I congratulate the producers of this excellent study, and I urge all Americans and world citizens to watch this full program---it is the best, clearest, most detailed and most-eyewitnessed analysis of what happened you will find. And it does prove beyond reasonable doubt that we have been lied to. Now it's up to us to act.
"religion is mentioned it starts fights and war."
Yep, two things guaranteed to start arguments, politics and religion.
drewsiboberinski is the only one insisting on making religion an issue here. I 've only asked for FACTS. I don't care if one is a Muslim, athiest, Buddist or Christian, I still demand to see proof of any dubious or blatantly BS claims. I'm an equal opportunity skeptic!
@Dorisequador so you know, "since your so gay" should be "since you're so gay". You're is the abbreviation of you are. I hope that helps with your english dumbo!
@drewsiboberinski It's ok Looser it must be hard being one but for you probably easy.. You are weak and your insults weak.. fuck you. You will always be nothing but a looser.
@ wontuguessmyname Operation northwoods wasn't put into action because JFK didnt sign off on it, if you looked up U.S.S Liberty an U.S.S Maine you would see OP northwoods is nothing new. Governments have been using false flag attacks before the U.S. how about this you probably didnt hear about attorney general Holder the guy behind OP fast & furious was the head of a FBI OP that sold the explosive to the Oklahoma city bombers you can look it up its there in government papers.
if YOU looked them up you would find that U.S.S Liberty was was attacked by the Israel Defense Forces, which they ADMITTED.
The explosion on the U.S.S Maine was believed to be caused by either a mine or spontaneous combustion of coal in the bunker adjacent to the reserve six-inch magazine. The exact cause has never been agreed on and certainly no one has ever provided any credible evidence that it done by the US government.
don't worry guys its just the first of a series of cover ups to put us in another proxy war with the Russians because only the idiots believe that the cold war ended with Khrushchev and the Soviet Union
The government wouldnt kill its own people, would they?? look up operation northwoods, U.S.S Liberty, U.S.S Maine, gulf of tonka, check out the Bush family connection to hitler an the nazi's, Iran contra, operation paperclip, operation fast & furious, Federal reserve fraud, look up the rothschild timeline. the list goes on an on
Operation Northwoods actually provides evidence to the contrary because it was rejected by our Governement. Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer who proposed it was within months of doing so denied another term as chairman of the The Joint Chiefs of Staff and transferred to another job.
Do you care to explain in detail how any one of these other events proves the US government kills it''s own people?
@wontuguessmyname ahh I get it. just looked at your profile. Another dumb american christian. The most dangerous and ignorant people on earth. BTW god is not in the white house either as stated by GWB....makes me puke. don't hide behind your bible son
Did your illogical hatred of Americans cause you to become unhinged or have you always been so?
How the hell did the crazy train you're on jump to religion? Where have I quoted the bible or used religion in any of my comments? I have only asked 13MrCaine for proof of his claims and so far he hasn't been able to provide any. If he was smart and actually did some research he would know the cases he cited were BS.
@wontuguessmyname My illogical hatred of Americans???? Totally logical son. WTF is with all the war mongering? Then you've got the whole fucked up christian shit going on. How hypocritical.
911 was a false flag operation to enable war mongering in the middle east. Everyone knows this.
America has no problem killing it's own people. Sending troops off to Iraq to find WMD that never existed in the first place. What would sweet baby jesus think?
@wontuguessmyname because George W Bush was quoted as saying "god is in the white house" WTF. This was during the time that the yanks wanted blood for 911. Americans are hypocrites of the highest order. God bless america...vomit! YOU need to get of the crazy train LOL
"George W Bush was quoted as saying "god is in the white house""
Again what does that have to do with the original topic of asking 13MrCaine for proof of his claims? You are defininately suffering from a mental defect which keeps you from focusing on the current topic. Perhaps ADD? I've got to return to work today. I suggest you see a mental health professional.
ok first off any one called AmericanDissent is to be ignored. 2 no lage plane palrts were found as this building was built with iron suports so it compleatly shreded the plane no parts was found on the lawn due to the massive folward momentom.
@omegassault most structral engeners that investagated the pentagon agree with me. 2 the bulding was built in 1941 back then buildings were built with large iron rod placed though he concreate of the structure part of the reason that it stayed up for so long after the plane hit this means that large/many plane parts did not survive, but your mind will not be changed as your just a gulable conspirisy nut who has dicided thats what happned no matter what evidence is given
@camoman35 america is still going down the drain... and likewise your mind won't be changed this video shows evidence as well. p.s not a nut consider myself quite neutral... what can be said about you?
@omegassault well to to be honest bush is responsible for 911 but it was bush sr
as he sent the cia to train osama bin laden and the rest of his goons so in that respect your correct. the evidence on the video is unconclusive as the eyewinises all said it was a plane it's posisonining is less inportant, because if it had been a undercover OP they would have no need to lie it is probebly a mistake by the goverment.
@camoman35 maybe all these "truthers" can be shut up if there was at least one clear video of the attack on the pentagon (I'm sure there was more than one camera) and the terrorists boarding the planes. bad idea?
13 indpendent witnesses gave a unanimous account of the plane's flight path as it approached the Pentagon?!?!? This independent investigation should really look at the research on the reliability and validity of eyewitness testimony.
Also, there was no timeline as to when they talked to these eyewitnesses. People have a tendency to fill in gaps of their memories with information not necessarily true--although we don't actually realize that this is occurring--it's called conflabulation.
@SmarticlesTheGoof These questions are not a part of the conspiracy equation because they are logical queries. Logical thinking plays no part in the fantasy world of the naysayers.
@mizzury54 Apparently they like to totally throw out everything that disproves conspiracy (which is quite a lot). Taking quotes out of context, not showing people full articles and instead showing people only the parts that support their ideas, and calling everybody who disagrees "government paid disinformers" is routine.
@drewsiboberinski They were there to try and find out if there were weapons of mass destruction. That was a side objective; the main objective was the stabilize the region in which Iraqis lived in.
The situation in Iraq is less tense than it was a decade ago, hence why the US is leaving Iraq.
@SmarticlesTheGoof Lost & Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.
@SmarticlesTheGoof Lost and Reported Stolen - $6.6 billion of U.S. taxpayers' money earmarked for Iraq reconstruction, reported on June 14, 2011 by Special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction Stuart Bowen who called it "the largest theft of funds in national history." (Source - CBS News) Last known holder of the $6.6 billion lost: the U.S. government.
@SmarticlesTheGoof U.S. Troop Casualties - 4,486 US troops; 98% male. 91% non-officers; 82% active duty, 11% National Guard; 74% Caucasian, 9% African-American, 11% Latino. 19% killed by non-hostile causes. 54% of US casualties were under 25 years old. 72% were from the US Army
Non-U.S. Troop Casualties - Total 316, with 179 from the UK
US Troops Wounded - 32,226, 20% of which are serious brain or spinal injuries. (Total excludes psychological injuries.)
@drewsiboberinski Take a poll NOW, not in 2005. We're leaving Iraq. The situation is better than a couple years ago. Why else would we leave? Oh, perhaps to be less annoying ;)
@DarthElius This is part 1 of 8 as the title suggests. keep clicking the links on the right. Its one of the best documentaries i have seen. well worth your time.
@Vlum88 :p I didn't even see the 1/8 in the title. I must have just thought it was part of the date or something. Thanks for clueing me in. I will certainly watch the other 7 parts now that I know they are there.
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
chklittle...Why would the government attack itself? To turn this country into a what it is today, a police state. How bad do you need to have your Constitutional diminished be fore you jump on the bus to the FEMA camp? I'll bet if everybody believed the way you do, We would probably end up sewing footwear for the Chinese.
@chklitttle This. And why the hell would the government ATTACK ITSELF? It wiped out some of its own secret service personnel? Why?? Just to fake having a bigger reason to declare war?
@SmarticlesTheGoof actually the day before 9/11 rumsfeld said that the pentagon lost 2.2 Billion dollars and the next day the towers (uncluding 7) were DEMOLISHED along with the area of the pentagon where the FINANCIAL RECORDS were kept
and you might want to do some research into false flag attacks conducted by the CIA
@TheGac504 I did do research. It appears as though it makes sense to conspiracy theorists. What you do not know however is that if you take a closer look at the information, it shows a very different picture. Rumsfeld said "we cannot TRACK 2.3 trillion dollars in transaction".
The money was not actually missing - according to Rumsfeld it was more the incompatible and aging financial systems didn't allow it to be tracked throughout the system.
@TheGac504 It is utterly false that this was made to public knowledge only on 9/10. Rumsfeld and others had known about the untrackable trillions early 2000, before Bush was even elected.
@TheGac504 The financial records were not purposely destroyed actually. Important budget information was in the damaged area of the Pentagon. However...
@chklitttle Have you even tried to find the aswer to that question? The planes are made largely of aluminum which melts at 1,200 degrees. The fires burned at 1,800 degrees. Much of the planes would have melted in the fires. However the engines and several other peices which were made either of steel or titanium ALL survived the fire and were recovered. The bodies were never showen because it would be disrespectful to the dead to put them on display but they were also recovered.
@AMRennsports Hey dumb ass... At what point did I say it was the jet fuel? Ofcourse jet fuel does not burn very hot because it is designed to burn quickly. More like an explosion then a fire really... The burning jet fuel ignigted the debris in the building and the DEBRIS burned at 1,800 degrees. How smart do you feel now?
the man says that the wreckage does not match what is typical of a plane crash. Well no shit buddy, a plane doesn't typically drill into a brick building at full speed !!! Most plane crashes are done in a manner where the pilot was actually trying to save the plane and people, not destroy everything !!!
The pics showing the red lines as impact points of the extents of the plane as it reaches the building let anyone know whomever made the pic is not so bright and lying.
The top of the tail is quite a few feet behind the base of the tail, the base impacts the Pentagon before the top thus alters the position of the top. Same with the wing tips.
The columns shown to the left of the main impact site that are deformed with some curved to the right is due to a huge turbofan engine.
What is missing from this model is 05281987 matius rust, red square. Two days later our state media has animation of "how this could not happen at the pentagon" due to landscaped covered anti aircraft would fragment anything incoming. Why would you delete a major causal agent? Ad anti aircraft to your model a few seconds before impact. Now boys and girls, what would be hitting the pentagon?
I wish some people would do a computer model on the impact on the Pentagon "if" it had been hit by a fighter jet and compare the result with existing videos and pictures. If the results are perfectly matched, then we will know the Pentagon was in fact hit by a fighter jet and not a commercial airplane.
I wish some people would do a computer model on the impact on the Pentagon "if" it had been hit by a Bull Moose and compare the result with existing videos and pictures. If the results are perfectly matched, then we will know the Pentagon was in fact hit by a Bull Moose and not a commercial airplane.
Or how bout... If someone did a computer model of a commercial plane hitting the Pentagon and the results matched perfectly, would you then believe a commercial plane hit the pentagon?
@ljandy44 Because it's a force impacting an object.
And I can guarantee you that a bomb with a force equivalent to what was used in the world trade center bombing in 1993 or the Oklahoma bombing was far greater than a piece of aluminum hitting something at 600 mph.
Also many of those windows may not have even been directly impacted by the plane.
@idesofmarchUNlAEA The Towers were 90% Air Mass by Volume. it had less 20 seconds to be forced to escape somewhere. Where did it GO?? IN ANOTHER DIMENSION RUN BY G.W.B.?? - Missiles do not leave a 100 yard char mark like the one on the Pentagon. TwooffTards are victims of their own Scam. Just Research where the millions in "Donations" go. Sure as hell aint going for a Doomed to FAIL INVESTIGATION !! Suckers are the TwooffTards. S-U-C-K-E-R-S !!
lol theres no conspiracy but u guys need to respect the dead, or were they just captured and sent to naboo buy a teleporter. damn u conspiracy theirorists are fucking idiots
jamatune22 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get a SIM, top it up, earn a fiver!
GiffGaff
URL: tiny(dot)cc/getyourfreesim
Follow us on twitter: @GiffGaffDeals
UK ONLY!
GenieOfTheTorch 2 days ago
someone call mulder & scully for fuck sake.
scottydot80 3 days ago
Eyewitnesses= homeless guys living in the gas station that we payed $ to have them say what we want them to say. The video of the plane hitting the building isn't conclusive enough.
TheBuckhunter270 1 week ago
What we have here is an expert in speculation, and also an expert on what is supposed to happen when a plane crashes(he thinks). I speculate that Mickey Mouse was flying the plane. And what about the people that were on that flight that died and their families buried them? A simple case of witness protection for 100+ people all at once? Better call the actors from In Plain Sight they might have some information on these cases. You are a horrible speculator sir.
TheBuckhunter270 1 week ago
"NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK" - copy and paste this to watch the full documentary
TheJohndoemofo 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Shills/Trolls/Disinfo (S.T.Ds) on here are under total control from their Handlers/Orderers/Masters/Owners (H.O.M.Os). Basically the HOMOs spread their STDs to try and infect free speech about 9/11 and stop people from spreading the truth, about 9/11 begging ppl to shut up, i wont do it, its so obvious and blatant, yet another false flag slaughtering 3000 innocent ppl, its disgusting, and the perps will burn in hell for it!
wellifthemediasaysit 2 weeks ago
@solarmotorsports he is say that the physical impact of something that size should have demolished those windows.
wykydrone 2 weeks ago
@davis4037 not possible. Think about how big a 747 is, if it slid into a column collision damage would happen period. Regardless of how strong a building is impact damage from a plane that size would still be evident.
wykydrone 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Shills/Trolls/Disinfo (S.T.Ds) on here are under total control from their Handlers/Orderers/Masters/Owners (H.O.M.Os). Basically the HOMOs spread their STDs to try and infect free speech about 9/11 and stop people from spreading the truth, about 9/11 begging ppl to shut up, i wont do it, its so obvious and blatant, yet another false flag slaughtering 3000 innocent ppl, its disgusting, and the perps will burn in hell for it!
wellifthemediasaysit 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
thumm99 3 weeks ago
l don't understand if no plane hit why are there numerous photos of passenger jet wreckage including fuselage pieces in American Airlines colours?
Spindry96 1 month ago
The shill known as MrAwsome514 has been commenting on multiple 9/11 videos claiming his grandfather died on Flight 77, that his neighbor's dad died on Flight 77, and that he is a 767 Pilot.
LifePsyop 1 month ago
DUHHH... the pentagon is built stronger because it's a goverment building DUHHH...
washington4478 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@washington4478 Built stronger, only on the side the plane hit, not long before the plane hit it.
Not an odd thing to do at all.
roflcopterkklol 1 month ago
You could please label these things order? If this is 1 of 8, where is 2 of 8, 3 of 8 so my idiot friends will watch them. One told, "There's just that one, I'm not watching all of them if I can't find the next one." Not helping by not labeling them. Thanks.
TheSenzoGaeri 1 month ago
A civilian plane can easily be catched on a cam, the planes crashed on the twin towers they were clearly shown as planes eventhough they were at a flying high speed (not on the ground but in the air), and still they were identified as planes from every angle and cam, but in the Pentagon it's not identified at all.
comali2212 1 month ago
A regular plane is not that fast for not being clear on a camera, only a missile is fast enough not be shown clearly.
comali2212 1 month ago
quick things to say
pentagon is an important gov building, so confiscating film is normal, blast proof absolutely means that they are impact proof, columns could have theoretically survived even if outer walls did not, most explosions go up and out, a plane that explodes (due to fuel) is going to be in smaller pieces than just impact crashes, foundations are really strong compared to rest of building, distances can be off, official reports dont always have correct details, (cont...)
Davis4037 1 month ago
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
How many of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's 1600+ architectural and engineering professionals have experience in structural engineering, high rise construction, or controlled demolition?
What did Hani Hanjour’s flight instructors have to say about his flying ability?
Who was Ali Mohamed and what is his relationship with Osama Bin Laden and the CIA?
ctcole77 2 weeks ago
STOOOOOOP!!!
"Although these windows were blast proof, it is not reasonable to suggest they weren't 757-proof"
Why not? How are you basing this claim? Got any calcs to prove it? Manufacturer's cut sheets? UL test results? Are you a window manufacturer? Myth Busters, at least? I'm tired of hearing unfounded claims on how the damage "should've occurred" based on nothing but speculation from people without the slightest clue of physics, chemistry, structural engineering, etc.
SolerMotorsports 1 month ago 6
@SolerMotorsports Thousands of Engineers have spoken out against 9/11.. look up engineers for 9/11 truth.. but the whole window comment was stupid, I agree.. smh.
DailyStaley 2 weeks ago
Show me a window, hell, show me anything that's 757 proof. It's completely unreasonable that you're making that argument.
MaRTiiaNN 1 week ago
@SolerMotorsports if a plane hits a blast-proof window, I think the plane willl win...
ImTidal 1 week ago
@SolerMotorsports well at least there should have been a body or two or some plane parts? but NO just a hole and a war! we americans are FUCKING STUPID! and fat if i might add!
MegaHayhayhayhay 6 days ago 2
@SolerMotorsports the day before 9/11 it was announced we had lost 2.3 trillion dollors?just disappeared? the the part of the pentagon that was hit and all the people who were killed had the information to the truth behind where that money is! oh well.. and on 9/12 there was supposed to be a investigation on the election that bush won! well we couldent be questioning the president right after a terrorist attack on THE GREAT US OF "A"!!
MegaHayhayhayhay 6 days ago 2
it never even existed
smashandcrashbros 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No plane? This was found: 757 rim, 757 turbine, blue 757 seats, fuselage wreckage with "American" logo visible, Rolls Royce RB211 engine parts, structural wreckage matching Boing paint primer schemes, 60+ bodies matching the passenger and flight crew list and returned to the families. How about disproving this before you make uneducated gueses about the impact
Spindry96 1 month ago
If flight 77 did not hit the pentagon, where did it go???
apvial 1 month ago
Building 7 fell because of the shoking news about their brothers.
MrLuisinh0 1 month ago
It is trully shocking that people are really buying the official story. I think americans should really learn how to build skyscrapers because they seem to fall even with few small office fires like building 7. What is the pentagon made out of? Is must be some strong stuff because it makes beoing 757 dissapear. The official story is a lie. I love america and have been there many times before and planning to go back in just a few months but dont believe everything you are told by the goverment.
kolbrunhelga1 1 month ago
@kolbrunhelga1 Well, the Pentagon IS built stronger than anything else but it does not make planes disappear. It just shatters them to pieces. Debris from the plane was all over the place. And you might be right about us having to learn to build skyscrapers: the chief civil engineer that designed the WTC towers said that they thought of all kinds of storms and natural disasters but the thought of a plane hitting the towers and the resulting jet fuel fire never even crossed their minds.
SolerMotorsports 1 month ago 2
@SolerMotorsports Every hijacked planes literally disappeared until they searched every parts one by one. The WTC collapsings and the plane collisions have unique behaviour in the whole history of collapsings and collisions. No such happenings ever happened, now this all happened in one incident. Oh and the both 767's flew toward computer secure rooms at the WTC. And then the timeline of the Pentagon pictures show more strange stuff. At least this all prooves something is not right.
Scumbot404 1 month ago
@SolerMotorsports How do you know how the Pentagon works when impacted by a plane? Show me your proof because I've never seen a plane hit anything without having large chunks of debris somewhere. The Space Shuttle Colombia had larger debris than they found at the pentagon for fucks sake.
MaRTiiaNN 1 week ago
@SolerMotorsports With all due respect, this comment is pure RUBBISH. The documentary evidence against all your assertions is easily available.
37Dionysos 1 week ago
9/11=Insurance Fraud by Jew Bankers! Just search: "pull it" Building #7 for all the Moronic Lemmings, with there Head in the Dirt, & there Dick in Hollywood! I laugh when Ur in a FEMA camp, bitch ass Bildaberger lovers. Fuk the United Police States! infowars.com
TheDarthvader9999 1 month ago
Highly recommended that folks watch all 8 parts. First-rate. Step by step you can see, listen, judge for yourself. If the plane did not hit the Pentagon, the NTSB flight path claim points to where (let's say) "they wanted" bomb-damage done. What was in there? Oh---the offices looking into $2.3 trillion of fraud. (Rummy at his nomination-hearing on C-Span laughed when asked to promise an accounting by Sen. Byrd). And Bldg. 7 had the ongoing Enron files. Hope this work nails the criminals.
Dionysos37 1 month ago
has any one ever considering the rapid heating of the jet fuel igniting, cracking the metal and then increased temptreture softning steel further weakening it ?
See now took me 20 seconds to come up with and write .....bullshit comes easy
teachersnightmaree 1 month ago
@Dorisequador You spelled loser wrong...
SauronforPresident 1 month ago
Absence of evidence is not, in itself, evidence. If anything needed covering up on 9/11 it would have been the firing of one or more air-to-air missiles on approach to the Pentagon. But there is no evidence of this. Comparing surviving parts of wreckage is ludicrous as each crash is uniquely affected by its own situational chaos.
Consider this theory: A small group of terrorists commandeered 4 planes and flew 3 of them into buildings.
HighwaySage 1 month ago
@HighwaySage and building 7 decided it wasn't feeling it that day and it decided to fall..... right.....
1blackdeath51501 1 month ago
@1blackdeath51501 Didn't you hear? It was on fire - burning all day.
HighwaySage 1 month ago
@HighwaySage lol, since when did a fire take down a building that big? I mean, honestly, show me another instance of a skyscraper falling in it's own print from a fire. go for it, you can even look at skyscrapers that were burning for days if you want.....
1blackdeath51501 1 month ago
@1blackdeath51501 A big building can make a big fire.
---You may have seen many mice running about which have escaped being eaten by hawks. Does this mean that hawks don't eat mice? ---
They decided to let the building burn and it failed. Metal, when very hot, bends like wet spaghetti. But let's just agree to disagree. I doubt either of us will be convinced by the other in this case. Be well.
HighwaySage 1 month ago
@HighwaySage convincing people of physics isn't my main priority now, and 911 is old and people will believe almost anything the media tells them, whatever. good luck, ron paul 2012 btw.
1blackdeath51501 1 month ago
@1blackdeath51501 Ron Paul 2012. I could live with that. What do you know? Common ground. :-)
HighwaySage 1 month ago
@HighwaySage sorry but corporate america wont allow that
drewsiboberinski 1 month ago
@HighwaySage ya, I'm helping out in anyway I can with Ron's campaign because the biggest issue that I stand with him is his anti war stance, I have ALOT of friends over in afghanistian and iraq and most of them are asking why they are there and are pissed for risking there lives for some special interests. and I've lost to many friends over there already, we need to come home. and no other candidate (rep. or dem.) will follow through on getting our troops home.
1blackdeath51501 1 month ago
@1blackdeath51501 we said! are people that dumb??
drewsiboberinski 1 month ago
@1blackdeath51501 When did you last see a jet airliner slam into a skyscraper at full speed? To suggest this is an impact a tall building built in the 70s could absorb is totally ludicrous. Get over it. In 10 years you have got nowhere with this madness except to be thought fools by the general population.
3558035580 1 month ago
@3558035580 no, the media is now considered the general population? American's are such sheep, even people from other countries can't believe your stupidity and ignorance, and how is it possible that building 7 went down, or how the pentagon survived, except for the branch that was put for an investigation for goldman sachs. that's what I want to know. you're stuidity is laughable.
1blackdeath51501 1 month ago
@1blackdeath51501 if you arent from the us why do you even have an opinion here? nobody cares what you have to say really... oh and nice spelling "stuidity"
AlphaWeazel 1 month ago
@1blackdeath51501 What you want to know is how to fit awkward facts into your pathetic world view. You just can't accept that muslim fanatics killed thousands of innocent people so you concoct this ridiculous conspiracy theory.
3558035580 1 month ago
@3558035580 yes because the insane crazy terrorists (LOL) could of killed 3 times as much 2 hours later, or that building 7 fell because it wasn't feeling it that day ya know? your stupidity is laughable.
1blackdeath51501 1 month ago
@camoman35 Not really and no i dont play COD only you would know about ''COD'' because your a nerd..and 2nd they make missiles that dont cause as much damage to a building but enough to do damage but not necessarily destroy it completely..This is why they made LGM are you retarted??
BigDCrushBlock 2 months ago
I congratulate the producers of this excellent study, and I urge all Americans and world citizens to watch this full program---it is the best, clearest, most detailed and most-eyewitnessed analysis of what happened you will find. And it does prove beyond reasonable doubt that we have been lied to. Now it's up to us to act.
37Dionysos 2 months ago
This program is outstanding in all its aspects---highly recommended all the way.
Dionysos37 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AUSS1E1
"religion is mentioned it starts fights and war."
Yep, two things guaranteed to start arguments, politics and religion.
drewsiboberinski is the only one insisting on making religion an issue here. I 've only asked for FACTS. I don't care if one is a Muslim, athiest, Buddist or Christian, I still demand to see proof of any dubious or blatantly BS claims. I'm an equal opportunity skeptic!
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
@AUSS1E1 god bless america...spew
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Ya Goverment full of shit ...
Dorisequador 2 months ago
@Dorisequador which government?
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Your Goverment of course,, bitch.
Dorisequador 2 months ago
@Dorisequador which is?
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Well, since your so gay it must be your gay goverment.
Dorisequador 2 months ago
@Dorisequador intelligent response!
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@Dorisequador so you know, "since your so gay" should be "since you're so gay". You're is the abbreviation of you are. I hope that helps with your english dumbo!
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Go fuck yourself looser. hahahaha
Dorisequador 2 months ago
@Dorisequador I bet you checked the spelling of yourself too. Dumbo! lol
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski It's ok Looser it must be hard being one but for you probably easy.. You are weak and your insults weak.. fuck you. You will always be nothing but a looser.
Dorisequador 2 months ago
@Dorisequador are having a hissy fit? lol
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Not really .. we just got Pizza Yuppy... Ahh home made .. sweet...
Dorisequador 2 months ago
@Dorisequador what's with your rantings then. Do you have tourette syndrome?
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski No no I am and athlete..
Tired of lies and bullshit.. On YouTube
Our goverment made 911 The Myans predicted 2012 ALiens built helped us in the past?
Insults from nerds like you when opinions given..
SO I lash out a bit to vent I guess.. but I am very very happy and very rich so nothing really bothers me personally.
Dorisequador 2 months ago
@Dorisequador oh dear!
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
Truck Bomb?
conspiracymedia 2 months ago
Weapons of MASS DECEPTION from the UNITED SNAKES OF america. In GREED we TRU$T Red White & BLOOD with Pepper Spray.........
moonboy 2 months ago
@ wontuguessmyname Operation northwoods wasn't put into action because JFK didnt sign off on it, if you looked up U.S.S Liberty an U.S.S Maine you would see OP northwoods is nothing new. Governments have been using false flag attacks before the U.S. how about this you probably didnt hear about attorney general Holder the guy behind OP fast & furious was the head of a FBI OP that sold the explosive to the Oklahoma city bombers you can look it up its there in government papers.
13MrCaine 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@13MrCaine
if YOU looked them up you would find that U.S.S Liberty was was attacked by the Israel Defense Forces, which they ADMITTED.
The explosion on the U.S.S Maine was believed to be caused by either a mine or spontaneous combustion of coal in the bunker adjacent to the reserve six-inch magazine. The exact cause has never been agreed on and certainly no one has ever provided any credible evidence that it done by the US government.
That's 0 for 3
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
don't worry guys its just the first of a series of cover ups to put us in another proxy war with the Russians because only the idiots believe that the cold war ended with Khrushchev and the Soviet Union
Drag0ns92391 2 months ago
The government wouldnt kill its own people, would they?? look up operation northwoods, U.S.S Liberty, U.S.S Maine, gulf of tonka, check out the Bush family connection to hitler an the nazi's, Iran contra, operation paperclip, operation fast & furious, Federal reserve fraud, look up the rothschild timeline. the list goes on an on
13MrCaine 2 months ago
@13MrCaine
"gulf of tonka" I think you mean "Tonkin"
Operation Northwoods actually provides evidence to the contrary because it was rejected by our Governement. Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer who proposed it was within months of doing so denied another term as chairman of the The Joint Chiefs of Staff and transferred to another job.
Do you care to explain in detail how any one of these other events proves the US government kills it''s own people?
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
@wontuguessmyname sending U.S troops to Iraq to find weapons of mass destruction. How many lives were lost??? what a joke
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
"sending U.S troops to Iraq to find weapons of mass destruction"
Irrelevant to the question asked of 13MrCaine.
Irrelevant to the subject of the video.
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
@wontuguessmyname bullshit! think again
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
irrelevant - not relating or pertinent to the matter at hand
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
@wontuguessmyname think again - meaning not enough thought put into your original response.
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
"think again ..."
I don't need to son. Your reply was totally irrelevant to the question at hand.
Maybe if you go back and read the posts again you can figure out why but, I doubt it.
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
@wontuguessmyname cop out!
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@wontuguessmyname ahh I get it. just looked at your profile. Another dumb american christian. The most dangerous and ignorant people on earth. BTW god is not in the white house either as stated by GWB....makes me puke. don't hide behind your bible son
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
"don't hide behind your bible son"
Did your illogical hatred of Americans cause you to become unhinged or have you always been so?
How the hell did the crazy train you're on jump to religion? Where have I quoted the bible or used religion in any of my comments? I have only asked 13MrCaine for proof of his claims and so far he hasn't been able to provide any. If he was smart and actually did some research he would know the cases he cited were BS.
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
@wontuguessmyname My illogical hatred of Americans???? Totally logical son. WTF is with all the war mongering? Then you've got the whole fucked up christian shit going on. How hypocritical.
911 was a false flag operation to enable war mongering in the middle east. Everyone knows this.
America has no problem killing it's own people. Sending troops off to Iraq to find WMD that never existed in the first place. What would sweet baby jesus think?
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
Why do you keep trying to turn this to religion? Are you Muslim? atheist?
Whatever you are you need to get off the crazy train.
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
@wontuguessmyname because George W Bush was quoted as saying "god is in the white house" WTF. This was during the time that the yanks wanted blood for 911. Americans are hypocrites of the highest order. God bless america...vomit! YOU need to get of the crazy train LOL
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drewsiboberinski
"George W Bush was quoted as saying "god is in the white house""
Again what does that have to do with the original topic of asking 13MrCaine for proof of his claims? You are defininately suffering from a mental defect which keeps you from focusing on the current topic. Perhaps ADD? I've got to return to work today. I suggest you see a mental health professional.
wontuguessmyname 2 months ago
I've been saying this all along. I'm a certified first responder. Nobody beleives me
linnedg 2 months ago
ok first off any one called AmericanDissent is to be ignored. 2 no lage plane palrts were found as this building was built with iron suports so it compleatly shreded the plane no parts was found on the lawn due to the massive folward momentom.
camoman35 2 months ago
@camoman35 do you really not see the descent... watch?v=mCsQDGH2v2I and wheres your proof for your theory?
omegassault 2 months ago
@omegassault most structral engeners that investagated the pentagon agree with me. 2 the bulding was built in 1941 back then buildings were built with large iron rod placed though he concreate of the structure part of the reason that it stayed up for so long after the plane hit this means that large/many plane parts did not survive, but your mind will not be changed as your just a gulable conspirisy nut who has dicided thats what happned no matter what evidence is given
camoman35 2 months ago
@camoman35 america is still going down the drain... and likewise your mind won't be changed this video shows evidence as well. p.s not a nut consider myself quite neutral... what can be said about you?
omegassault 2 months ago
@omegassault well to to be honest bush is responsible for 911 but it was bush sr
as he sent the cia to train osama bin laden and the rest of his goons so in that respect your correct. the evidence on the video is unconclusive as the eyewinises all said it was a plane it's posisonining is less inportant, because if it had been a undercover OP they would have no need to lie it is probebly a mistake by the goverment.
camoman35 2 months ago
@camoman35 maybe all these "truthers" can be shut up if there was at least one clear video of the attack on the pentagon (I'm sure there was more than one camera) and the terrorists boarding the planes. bad idea?
omegassault 2 months ago
@omegassault your right but some people will always think it's a conspiriasy to bad eh..
camoman35 2 months ago
@camoman35 yeah but, maybe they'll stop thinking that once they see it but, it ain't happenin. I still wonder why...
omegassault 2 months ago
Then explain where the missing plane is? I can.. IT HIT THE PENTAGON FUCKTARD.
swamirob 2 months ago
Sir, I think you are retarted.
scipio4052 2 months ago
13 indpendent witnesses gave a unanimous account of the plane's flight path as it approached the Pentagon?!?!? This independent investigation should really look at the research on the reliability and validity of eyewitness testimony.
Also, there was no timeline as to when they talked to these eyewitnesses. People have a tendency to fill in gaps of their memories with information not necessarily true--although we don't actually realize that this is occurring--it's called conflabulation.
Andrea9578 2 months ago
What about the passengers on that flight? Did they not exist? :O
What about the pictures of plane parts, dead passengers, etc inside the Pentagon and across the lawns? Are they all photoshopped? :O
What about the dozens of witnesses who saw planes? Do they not exist? :O
Why would the government attack itself? Was it that desperate to invade the Middle East? :O
loosechangeguide(dot)com/lcg2(dot)html
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof These questions are not a part of the conspiracy equation because they are logical queries. Logical thinking plays no part in the fantasy world of the naysayers.
mizzury54 2 months ago
@mizzury54 Apparently they like to totally throw out everything that disproves conspiracy (which is quite a lot). Taking quotes out of context, not showing people full articles and instead showing people only the parts that support their ideas, and calling everybody who disagrees "government paid disinformers" is routine.
shows quite a bit of immaturity tbh.
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof showing the info that just proves your point is how any argument is battled out
Drag0ns92391 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof why would america invade iraq to find weapons of mass destruction when there clearly weren't any? : O what a joke!
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski They were there to try and find out if there were weapons of mass destruction. That was a side objective; the main objective was the stabilize the region in which Iraqis lived in.
The situation in Iraq is less tense than it was a decade ago, hence why the US is leaving Iraq.
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof Spent & Approved War-Spending - About $1 trillion of US taxpayers' funds spent or approved for spending through 2011.
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof Lost & Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof Lost and Reported Stolen - $6.6 billion of U.S. taxpayers' money earmarked for Iraq reconstruction, reported on June 14, 2011 by Special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction Stuart Bowen who called it "the largest theft of funds in national history." (Source - CBS News) Last known holder of the $6.6 billion lost: the U.S. government.
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof Mismanaged & Wasted in Iraq - $10 billion, per Feb 2007 Congressional hearings
Halliburton Overcharges Classified by the Pentagon as Unreasonable and Unsupported - $1.4 billion
Amount paid to KBR, a former Halliburton division, to supply U.S. military in Iraq with food, fuel, housing and other items - $20 billion
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof U.S. Troop Casualties - 4,486 US troops; 98% male. 91% non-officers; 82% active duty, 11% National Guard; 74% Caucasian, 9% African-American, 11% Latino. 19% killed by non-hostile causes. 54% of US casualties were under 25 years old. 72% were from the US Army
Non-U.S. Troop Casualties - Total 316, with 179 from the UK
US Troops Wounded - 32,226, 20% of which are serious brain or spinal injuries. (Total excludes psychological injuries.)
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof here's the clanger:
QUALITY OF LIFE INDICATORS
Iraqis Displaced Inside Iraq, by Iraq War, as of May 2007 - 2,255,000
Iraqi Refugees in Syria & Jordan - 2.1 million to 2.25 million
Iraqi Unemployment Rate - 27 to 60%, where curfew not in effect
Consumer Price Inflation in 2006 - 50%
Iraqi Children Suffering from Chronic Malnutrition - 28% in June 2007 (Per CNN.com, July 30, 2007)
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof Percent of professionals who have left Iraq since 2003 - 40%
Iraqi Physicians Before 2003 Invasion - 34,000
Iraqi Physicians Who Have Left Iraq Since 2005 Invasion - 12,000
Iraqi Physicians Murdered Since 2003 Invasion - 2,000
Average Daily Hours Iraqi Homes Have Electricity - 1 to 2 hours, per Ryan Crocker, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq (Per Los Angeles Times, July 27, 2007)
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY...............GET ME A FUCKN BUCKET!
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof Average Daily Hours Iraqi Homes Have Electricity - 10.9 in May 2007
Average Daily Hours Baghdad Homes Have Electricity - 5.6 in May 2007
Pre-War Daily Hours Baghdad Homes Have Electricity - 16 to 24
Number of Iraqi Homes Connected to Sewer Systems - 37%
Iraqis without access to adequate water supplies - 70% (Per CNN.com, July 30, 2007)
Water Treatment Plants Rehabilitated - 22%
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof RESULTS OF POLL Taken in Iraq in August 2005 by the British Ministry of Defense (Source: Brookings Institute)
Iraqis "strongly opposed to presence of coalition troops - 82%
Iraqis who believe Coalition forces are responsible for any improvement in security - less than 1%
Iraqis who feel less ecure because of the occupation - 67%
Iraqis who do not have confidence in multi-national forces - 72%
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Take a poll NOW, not in 2005. We're leaving Iraq. The situation is better than a couple years ago. Why else would we leave? Oh, perhaps to be less annoying ;)
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof sure, what are the official stats as of 2011?...this'll be interesting
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof go and fuck your self!!!!!!!
drewsiboberinski 2 months ago
@drewsiboberinski to stabilize* sorry
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
what a fucking moron. i would guess you couldn't teach a chimp to scratch it's on ass...
kickinit720 2 months ago
Is there a part 2?
DarthElius 2 months ago
@DarthElius This is part 1 of 8 as the title suggests. keep clicking the links on the right. Its one of the best documentaries i have seen. well worth your time.
Vlum88 2 months ago
@Vlum88 :p I didn't even see the 1/8 in the title. I must have just thought it was part of the date or something. Thanks for clueing me in. I will certainly watch the other 7 parts now that I know they are there.
DarthElius 2 months ago
oooook..... Yep that sure is conclusive.
I call it conspiracy, look it up in the dictionary ;)
bjornh79 2 months ago
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
wellifthemediasaysit 2 months ago
chklittle...Why would the government attack itself? To turn this country into a what it is today, a police state. How bad do you need to have your Constitutional diminished be fore you jump on the bus to the FEMA camp? I'll bet if everybody believed the way you do, We would probably end up sewing footwear for the Chinese.
morriem 2 months ago
and people still adamantly tell their kids santa claus exists
chklitttle 2 months ago
Wheres the wreckage then ? the bodies ,seats ,tailsection ,engines etc ,how brainless are you ?cant you think for yourself halfwit ?
chklitttle 2 months ago
@chklitttle This. And why the hell would the government ATTACK ITSELF? It wiped out some of its own secret service personnel? Why?? Just to fake having a bigger reason to declare war?
The government isn't THAT desperate.
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@SmarticlesTheGoof actually the day before 9/11 rumsfeld said that the pentagon lost 2.2 Billion dollars and the next day the towers (uncluding 7) were DEMOLISHED along with the area of the pentagon where the FINANCIAL RECORDS were kept
and you might want to do some research into false flag attacks conducted by the CIA
have fun waking up :)
TheGac504 2 months ago
@TheGac504 I did do research. It appears as though it makes sense to conspiracy theorists. What you do not know however is that if you take a closer look at the information, it shows a very different picture. Rumsfeld said "we cannot TRACK 2.3 trillion dollars in transaction".
The money was not actually missing - according to Rumsfeld it was more the incompatible and aging financial systems didn't allow it to be tracked throughout the system.
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@TheGac504 defense(dot)gov/news/article(dot)aspx?id = 44199
Might wanna reexamine ^^
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@TheGac504 It is utterly false that this was made to public knowledge only on 9/10. Rumsfeld and others had known about the untrackable trillions early 2000, before Bush was even elected.
hv(dot)greenspun(dot)com / bboard / q-and-a-fetch-msg(dot)tcl?msg_id = 002hxm
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@TheGac504 The financial records were not purposely destroyed actually. Important budget information was in the damaged area of the Pentagon. However...
cooperativeresearch(dot)org/context(dot)jsp?item = a091001defensebudget
What does "stand alone financial statement" mean? Well, the military can answer that.
dodig(dot)mil/audit/reports/fy02/02-073(dot)pdf
No impact on the 2.3 trillion dollars at all. :)
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@TheGac504 The 2.3 trillion dollars also had been accounted for later btw, if you didn't know. At least 2/3 of it by Feb 2002.
defenselink(dot)mil/news/Feb2002/n02202002_200202201(dot)html
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@TheGac504 You might be the one to want to wake up, unless you think all those pages are lying. :)
SmarticlesTheGoof 2 months ago
@chklitttle Have you even tried to find the aswer to that question? The planes are made largely of aluminum which melts at 1,200 degrees. The fires burned at 1,800 degrees. Much of the planes would have melted in the fires. However the engines and several other peices which were made either of steel or titanium ALL survived the fire and were recovered. The bodies were never showen because it would be disrespectful to the dead to put them on display but they were also recovered.
MrAwsome514 2 months ago
Comment removed
AMRennsports 2 months ago
@AMRennsports Hey dumb ass... At what point did I say it was the jet fuel? Ofcourse jet fuel does not burn very hot because it is designed to burn quickly. More like an explosion then a fire really... The burning jet fuel ignigted the debris in the building and the DEBRIS burned at 1,800 degrees. How smart do you feel now?
MrAwsome514 2 months ago
i was in the fucking pentagon when it happened and guess what a plane fucking crashed in the fucking PENTAGON
jasonlp96 2 months ago
Comment removed
DanSaw120285 2 months ago
the man says that the wreckage does not match what is typical of a plane crash. Well no shit buddy, a plane doesn't typically drill into a brick building at full speed !!! Most plane crashes are done in a manner where the pilot was actually trying to save the plane and people, not destroy everything !!!
bigrigJim 2 months ago
Comment removed
RandomLevitation 2 months ago
The pics showing the red lines as impact points of the extents of the plane as it reaches the building let anyone know whomever made the pic is not so bright and lying.
The top of the tail is quite a few feet behind the base of the tail, the base impacts the Pentagon before the top thus alters the position of the top. Same with the wing tips.
The columns shown to the left of the main impact site that are deformed with some curved to the right is due to a huge turbofan engine.
Parad0xdevelopments 2 months ago
911 was done by american government !!!!
azzubhaiya 2 months ago
@azzubhaiya they don't have enough money to pay everyone to keep quiet. moron
Chyrnobil 2 months ago
ffs.. knobs like you need to go out & get a fuck. incomprehensible stupidity.
oddly, the rest of the world saw planes smashing into the wtc & fireballs & people jumping.
oh, that was an optical illusion too??
s1ndydoll 2 months ago
@s1ndydoll you watched the news and saw that too?
ericmck2000 2 months ago
What is missing from this model is 05281987 matius rust, red square. Two days later our state media has animation of "how this could not happen at the pentagon" due to landscaped covered anti aircraft would fragment anything incoming. Why would you delete a major causal agent? Ad anti aircraft to your model a few seconds before impact. Now boys and girls, what would be hitting the pentagon?
idesofmarchUNIAEA 2 months ago
I wish some people would do a computer model on the impact on the Pentagon "if" it had been hit by a fighter jet and compare the result with existing videos and pictures. If the results are perfectly matched, then we will know the Pentagon was in fact hit by a fighter jet and not a commercial airplane.
Vlum88 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Vlum88
I wish some people would do a computer model on the impact on the Pentagon "if" it had been hit by a Bull Moose and compare the result with existing videos and pictures. If the results are perfectly matched, then we will know the Pentagon was in fact hit by a Bull Moose and not a commercial airplane.
Or how bout... If someone did a computer model of a commercial plane hitting the Pentagon and the results matched perfectly, would you then believe a commercial plane hit the pentagon?
no10standard 2 months ago
Here's an idea...Who the fuck cares! People died that's what matters..get over it virgin
xXManxAxPartXx 2 months ago
Very little was reported inside? lol
prove that false statement. A hundred witnesseses saw a plane. No one saw a missile.
Explain that.
There were no large pieces in some pics we found on the internet. Well maybe because they were inside the building dumbass.
Blast proof, but not 757 proof. WTF does that even mean? A force hitting something is the same no matter what the origins.
If this weren't such an obvious troll video I'd think you were just mentally retarded.
igykalen 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@igykalen how does it not matter what the origin is?
ljandy44 2 months ago
@ljandy44 Because it's a force impacting an object.
And I can guarantee you that a bomb with a force equivalent to what was used in the world trade center bombing in 1993 or the Oklahoma bombing was far greater than a piece of aluminum hitting something at 600 mph.
Also many of those windows may not have even been directly impacted by the plane.
igykalen 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SkuIICrusherGhost 2 months ago