You are talking of distinction in conjunction with cognition. If distinction is essential to your organic numbers, then cognition is also essential. What does cognition have to do with defining numbers? In defining axioms of mathematic, there can be no observer. Adding an oberser via cognition immediately restricts the axioms to that particular observer.
This would result in mathematics that isn't universal.
This is starting to sound like numerology, not mathematics.
You are talking of distinction in conjunction with cognition. If distinction is essential to your organic numbers, then cognition is also essential. What does cognition have to do with defining numbers? In defining axioms of mathematic, there can be no observer. Adding an oberser via cognition immediately restricts the axioms to that particular observer.
This would result in mathematics that isn't universal.
This is starting to sound like numerology, not mathematics.
SearcherOfReason 2 years ago
Impressive lecture indeed! I find this very interesting.
ollipelz 2 years ago