time space and motion may be very "real" illusions, and thus all that exists may be "a change of location", which accords nicely with what is being presented here.The nature or state of anything in the universe is entirely determined by it's location and it's change of location.Everything in the universe is moving relative to everything else. It has to. What we perceive as energy or movement is an elastic quality in whatever supports the illusion. Oscillation is fundamental.
I wholeheartedly agree with you Arty. I have always believed in the vibration of the ether cause/creating what we perceive as solid matter & light and that it is totally compatible with the hebrew Genesis where god created by sending forth "The Word" i.e: the first vibration and that first vibration can still be felt as the "background radiation" from the "Big Bung". I also visualized galaxies as flower heads opening & spreading seeds i.e: quasars & proto`s amongst other things like vibz & leky
Intersting .. Are you familiar with Paul LaViolette's work ? Do you think Harmonics theory predicts galactic waves ? How do you think Harmonics theory relates with Consciousness ?
@xaotiko Yes, have read some of Paul LaViolette's work. The spacing of galaxy super clusters, galaxy clusters and galaxies are consistent with harmonics theory. I don't know how consciousness works.
@lovejesusallways Many traditions have such statements as "in the beginning was the word" or "let there be light". Given that these are vibrations, then there is no contradiction. Vibration is the essence of what makes the universe tick (so to speak)
@lovejesusallways Yes, all traditions have origin like "in the beginning was light" or "starting with sound" and so on. I think that it has been understood that vibration is the ultimate basis of everything for thousands of years. But then people keep forgetting! You can't rely on vibrations to remember what they are. ;-)
@lovejesusallways That is where I get my impression on the Tao: an 'up' pressure and a 'down' pressure. You can connect that to electromagnetics, photonics, acoustics, etc. Add a frequency and intensity, everything becomes clear, from the microscopic quanta to the universe.
WSM is a stationary grid in space that is neutral until the frequency lifes energy transfers to it creating mass viscosity and structure temporarily until the enegry and frequency pass through it and it returns once again to a neutral phase in space Bret V
The grid would only be stationary if there were no larger waves. However I think that larger waves are always distorting the smaller ones and giving them motion. Life is just a consequence of this rather than a cause.
excellent definition of quantum mechanics, but a couple questions 1) What started/made the first standing wave. 2) what started the vibration or harmonics. 3) how did the vibrations form conscious & organic life. My theory of evolution, everything started somewhere, did the universe just magically appear, it actually works with your theory, if you can think of life, as a lazar pointer, a single spot spun around at high speeds becomes a continuous line. life is relevant to perspective and time
when you figure out consciousness, and why there's 2 healthy baby's born but 1 is still born, you might Have an idea of what im trying to figure out. who made God? lol who made your consciousness? I dont know , who or what started the first wave? just triying to figure out the big picture , not just the little pieces. peace
I think that if we take it personally that a baby is stillborn then we are not recognizing that the Universe is a machine. Of course we don't, we are part of the cogs. :-)
X Theory 0+1 * infinity * infinity / infinity. We are all 1 and ultimately connected, if you take GOD as point O, The creator of each wave, and the harmonic tone or action that started everything in motion. A standing wave before they were creating each other (which mimics life on a smaller scale), each individual life, and the eventual evolution of each galaxy. As infinity signs of different sizes, but joined at the center or X point.
Other dimensions being of different light wave lengths or tones life as a constant string, but instead of a linear type string , an Infinity sign that is constantly vibrating because of different Perspectives and the theory of Relativity, the Chaos theory, X being your transition between birth and death, (Heaven, or to the next level of existence, depending on your believe). then add in some time for evolution and reaction, up to this point in time.
Because harmonics divide both space and time, it turns out that they exist in velocity also: light, sound, heat, ocean currents, continental drift - these make another series at ratios of ~10^4.5 just like the scale of structures. It may be that there are faster and slower waves that these also, and that in a sense they can be other "realms".
N sorry to double post, but my analogy of the female and male essence's idea, is mirrored in the action of sex..this may sound a bit silly.. idk...but think of genitalia and how it represents matter entering a void n creating life in the process. not to mention there is plenty of "vibration" going on in that process.lol
Though my main question I would like a perspective on... is if matter is made of vibrations, or if they just give matter its form, like a mold?
The vibrations are all that there is IMO. But larger waves give form to where the smaller waves are stronger, so it acts as form also.
In humans the genitalia are right at the 2nd harmonic. The nipples right at the 4th. So these divisions do seem fundamentally important.
Natural formations show evidence of harmonic waves following the imperial units such as fathom, yard, cubit, span, foot, palm, hand, inch etc. but also the longer ones of league, mile, furlong, chain and pole.
Related to the pole (5.5 yards) is the megalithic yard of 2.75 feet (1/6 of pole).
I think that males are based on yards and females on megalithic yards which makes their (ideal) heights 6' and 5'6" respectively and in the exact ratio of 12:11, so music with that quality might be interesting for your "vibrations". :-)
Great video's, glad your spreading this knowledge.
Does vibration make up matter or just give it form?
Can't we think of the universe itself as a romance... what if the interaction between vibration and matter is the interaction of a male and female essence of creation.
I only say that, because last time I checked, it takes 2 sex's.... to create life...can that not apply to the macro scale?
Ultimately I think that everything is just the vibrations of the aether. But it is also true that at the larger scale, vibrations can give form to matter which is smaller vibrations.
Not sure about that other question ... are you asking if galaxies and planets have sex? Not so far as I know. :-)
It may be impossible for the waves to go to the dead centre; all movement would stop. Energy can neither be created or destroyed.
The agitation would be ever greater about the centre: the balancing centrifugal force becomes stronger than the inwardly spiralling centripetal force ...
... very refreshing alternative to the billiard ball thinking of the 19th century, still finding some support even today.
Certainly the centres of waves behave a bit differently. The non-linearity becomes extreme and cause refraction or scattering of waves. There is as a result a phase change as you pass through the centre.
the questions people are asking, they should watch all the videos first. people are wanting explanations for theories based on other theories that are based on other incorrect theories and blaming newer theories for not supporting the others. most science is just people of average intelligence studying the subject of science. ..problems haha ofcourse, education is so indiscriminate, titles are given to people who could have been football players, but they chose physics classes instead.
I find this series most brilliant. What work has led to such insight? I also agree with fromouthere mainstream keeps it in the box. It is outside the box thinking that reveals insight. What is you view on evolution and cycles?
Thank you to your contribution to the free thinking.
The motion of the planets obeys an inverse square law with GR corrections to very high precision. If electric forces were involved (i.e if the planets had charge) then the difference would be very noticeable.
Another interesting video. This isn't relevant, but have you come across "Plasma Cosmology" and the "Electric Universe Theory"? That mite interest you possibly.
Yes, I have done a little reading on that. The ideas seem very realistic in explaining galaxy shapes for example, but the solar system works near enough to exclusively by gravity alone (except very small bodies).
The Harmonics Theory does not mind what the forces are, as they will have waves that are non-linear, which is its starting point.
Hmmm i have to disagree with you there. Gravity is a near infinite weak force, and can't even be used successfully (except in ignorance) to explain a working model of the Sun without contradictions/errors! Gravity only remains the predominant force/force of choice because of dogma, not because it is the truth of the situation.
The non-linearity of the waves means that energy is always moving to smaller scale harmonics. The rate of this can be determined by the Hubble redshift (it is not expansion). From that rate the correct strength of gravity can be calculated because the outward wave is 1 part in 10^40 weaker than the inward wave. That tiny difference is gravity compared to the stronger forces.
The whole thing about relativity is that it looks the same no matter which is moving. There may be ways to get past that but it is very subtle. That is because we never see the aether that the waves are in. As Einstein said, you cannot put a mark on the aether. The wave is a distortion of the aether which may be thought of as a continuous substance that pervades the entire universe. Everything that exists is waves in the aether.
Regarding gravity: You say that the harmonics continue to propagate inward towards center, smaller distance, same energy (or more due to harmonics), rising frequency. Wouldn't this lead to an outward pressure, as experienced by a second "particle"? Gravity then would not be a sucking motion, but a blowing one.
The harmonics always have nigher frequency and therefore shorter wavelength. That means that the energy becomes concentrated about a smaller centre. So looking at any given wave, there is gradual contraction over time.
There is always both inwards and outwards flux. And the difference is extremely tiny.
The redshift of quasars is not gravitational. According to Arp and Narlikar, it is new matter and has lower frequencies (hence looks redshifted) due to its newness and gradually the frequencies increase as the waves of that matter come in contact with other matter waves at the speed of light.
Interesting title: How to make a universe. Which begs the questions of how did the universe get made? Where did the ether come from? And some mysteries; what is the nature of the very numerous faint blue galaxies, which are quite distant? Why do you feel the red shift of quasars is gravitational rather than cosmological? If quasars are emitted from galaxies then how can their gravity red shifts be greater than the emitting galaxy, assuming that both are close to each other?
... I have performed simulations and this does happen for dimensions above 1D. There is a heap of empirical evidence for the other waves. I will post videos in the future about two of these where both the inter-nodal distances and cycles periods have been independently observed - specifically, the 586 million year cycle and the set at 160, 80, 6 and 3 minutes. Watch for these. The electron etc are the Johnny-come-latelies of the Universe.
Hi Geoff, thanks for your comments. And yet the pattern of cycles periods (or frequencies) observed in the Universe is exactly what is predicted by such an assumption. Maybe it can come about a slightly different way. Non-linearity causes harmonics - it is a simple mathematical fact. The new wave centres are formed as harmonics between the original ones exactly as you can have nodes on a guitar string that is only fixed at the two ends. ..
Metaphysics / dynamic unity of reality requires that space (wave medium) must be infinite (as only one substance existing cannot be created or bounded by anything else).
Harmonic theory - I just cannot agree that the universe arose from one wave that harmonically decays - I see no mechanism of energy exchange to create more wave centers - and no empirical evidence of all these other frequencies (the electron / positron seems fundamental).
"I just cannot agree that the universe arose from one wave that harmonically decays - I see no mechanism of energy exchange to create more wave centers"
There are three ways the wave can propagate:
1. Infinite Universe
Wave propagates further and further, still expanding. But it prevents it to reflect at the end and come back to make a standing wave.
2. Finite Universe
Wave propagates to its end and comes back. But why it reflects at the edge? What is further?
Its edges are wrapped up in higher dimensions to make a closed loop in all directions. If a wave propagates in this kind of universe it'll always wrap up and return, same if it reflected. Then it'll produce a standing wave with its own center :> [both nodes are the same point].
Hawking suggested that our Universe is on a surface of hypersphere. This kind of sphere is finite and infinite in the same time. If it expands, wave could change its frequency and produce harmonics.
@Saskachewan Certainly it is easier to understand if the universe is finite or wrapped. However even in known extended systems waves develop depending on conditions. For example ocean waves.
@Saskachewan The non-linearity of the universal wave equation causes harmonics to develop. This is well known physics. What is not well known is that in 3D these harmonics will make new wave centres. That does not happen in 1D.
@artynz: Are you sure? ;) I have a hint for you: intermodulation and beating. There is a little known formula from trigonometry which allows to change multiplication of sines/cosines into sum and difference, and vice versa. Sum and difference are obviously linear, as is wave interference. But multiplication is modulation, and is related to non-linear wave media. But if you can interchange one another mathematically, what does it mean? :> Give it a thought :) It's quite enlightening.
time space and motion may be very "real" illusions, and thus all that exists may be "a change of location", which accords nicely with what is being presented here.The nature or state of anything in the universe is entirely determined by it's location and it's change of location.Everything in the universe is moving relative to everything else. It has to. What we perceive as energy or movement is an elastic quality in whatever supports the illusion. Oscillation is fundamental.
robbieganz 9 months ago
I wholeheartedly agree with you Arty. I have always believed in the vibration of the ether cause/creating what we perceive as solid matter & light and that it is totally compatible with the hebrew Genesis where god created by sending forth "The Word" i.e: the first vibration and that first vibration can still be felt as the "background radiation" from the "Big Bung". I also visualized galaxies as flower heads opening & spreading seeds i.e: quasars & proto`s amongst other things like vibz & leky
TwoDigitz 9 months ago
Intersting .. Are you familiar with Paul LaViolette's work ? Do you think Harmonics theory predicts galactic waves ? How do you think Harmonics theory relates with Consciousness ?
xaotiko 11 months ago
@xaotiko Yes, have read some of Paul LaViolette's work. The spacing of galaxy super clusters, galaxy clusters and galaxies are consistent with harmonics theory. I don't know how consciousness works.
artynz 10 months ago
@artynz I recommend looking at Jay Gunkelman's youtube videos on consciousness. Another wave based system.
Lephrenic 10 months ago
i have a sneeky feeling that this series is actually a secretly coded communications hub for light bulb take over conspiricies
haroldofcardboard 1 year ago
HEY!!!!
this is part of 3A, okay?????
now pay attention mister!!!!!!
haroldofcardboard 1 year ago
In genesis it says God spoke the universe into being. Could this be what he is talking about.
lovejesusallways 1 year ago
@lovejesusallways Many traditions have such statements as "in the beginning was the word" or "let there be light". Given that these are vibrations, then there is no contradiction. Vibration is the essence of what makes the universe tick (so to speak)
artynz 1 year ago
@lovejesusallways Yes, all traditions have origin like "in the beginning was light" or "starting with sound" and so on. I think that it has been understood that vibration is the ultimate basis of everything for thousands of years. But then people keep forgetting! You can't rely on vibrations to remember what they are. ;-)
artynz 11 months ago
@lovejesusallways That is where I get my impression on the Tao: an 'up' pressure and a 'down' pressure. You can connect that to electromagnetics, photonics, acoustics, etc. Add a frequency and intensity, everything becomes clear, from the microscopic quanta to the universe.
Enigma415 5 months ago
is it seen more these days as scaler waves
hartejoseph 1 year ago
magic quad of multiplication
ciferusbux 1 year ago
WSM is a stationary grid in space that is neutral until the frequency lifes energy transfers to it creating mass viscosity and structure temporarily until the enegry and frequency pass through it and it returns once again to a neutral phase in space Bret V
2012DarkKnight 2 years ago
The grid would only be stationary if there were no larger waves. However I think that larger waves are always distorting the smaller ones and giving them motion. Life is just a consequence of this rather than a cause.
artynz 1 year ago
excellent definition of quantum mechanics, but a couple questions 1) What started/made the first standing wave. 2) what started the vibration or harmonics. 3) how did the vibrations form conscious & organic life. My theory of evolution, everything started somewhere, did the universe just magically appear, it actually works with your theory, if you can think of life, as a lazar pointer, a single spot spun around at high speeds becomes a continuous line. life is relevant to perspective and time
2012DarkKnight 2 years ago
I see no way to ever get to a beginning as we can always ask what caused that. God doesn't help, as what made God?
The harmonic formation is simply due to the wave equations being non-linear.
Again, I cannot see any sensible explanation for consciousness. But we can say that without it the whole show would be as if it didn't exist.
artynz 2 years ago
when you figure out consciousness, and why there's 2 healthy baby's born but 1 is still born, you might Have an idea of what im trying to figure out. who made God? lol who made your consciousness? I dont know , who or what started the first wave? just triying to figure out the big picture , not just the little pieces. peace
2012DarkKnight 2 years ago
I think that if we take it personally that a baby is stillborn then we are not recognizing that the Universe is a machine. Of course we don't, we are part of the cogs. :-)
artynz 2 years ago
god sings the song but what made the singer?
hartejoseph 1 year ago
X Theory 0+1 * infinity * infinity / infinity. We are all 1 and ultimately connected, if you take GOD as point O, The creator of each wave, and the harmonic tone or action that started everything in motion. A standing wave before they were creating each other (which mimics life on a smaller scale), each individual life, and the eventual evolution of each galaxy. As infinity signs of different sizes, but joined at the center or X point.
2012DarkKnight 2 years ago
Other dimensions being of different light wave lengths or tones life as a constant string, but instead of a linear type string , an Infinity sign that is constantly vibrating because of different Perspectives and the theory of Relativity, the Chaos theory, X being your transition between birth and death, (Heaven, or to the next level of existence, depending on your believe). then add in some time for evolution and reaction, up to this point in time.
2012DarkKnight 2 years ago
Because harmonics divide both space and time, it turns out that they exist in velocity also: light, sound, heat, ocean currents, continental drift - these make another series at ratios of ~10^4.5 just like the scale of structures. It may be that there are faster and slower waves that these also, and that in a sense they can be other "realms".
artynz 2 years ago
N sorry to double post, but my analogy of the female and male essence's idea, is mirrored in the action of sex..this may sound a bit silly.. idk...but think of genitalia and how it represents matter entering a void n creating life in the process. not to mention there is plenty of "vibration" going on in that process.lol
Though my main question I would like a perspective on... is if matter is made of vibrations, or if they just give matter its form, like a mold?
SnakeSSSStretcher 2 years ago
The vibrations are all that there is IMO. But larger waves give form to where the smaller waves are stronger, so it acts as form also.
In humans the genitalia are right at the 2nd harmonic. The nipples right at the 4th. So these divisions do seem fundamentally important.
Natural formations show evidence of harmonic waves following the imperial units such as fathom, yard, cubit, span, foot, palm, hand, inch etc. but also the longer ones of league, mile, furlong, chain and pole.
artynz 2 years ago
Related to the pole (5.5 yards) is the megalithic yard of 2.75 feet (1/6 of pole).
I think that males are based on yards and females on megalithic yards which makes their (ideal) heights 6' and 5'6" respectively and in the exact ratio of 12:11, so music with that quality might be interesting for your "vibrations". :-)
artynz 2 years ago
Great video's, glad your spreading this knowledge.
Does vibration make up matter or just give it form?
Can't we think of the universe itself as a romance... what if the interaction between vibration and matter is the interaction of a male and female essence of creation.
I only say that, because last time I checked, it takes 2 sex's.... to create life...can that not apply to the macro scale?
Just some crazy thoughts
SnakeSSSStretcher 2 years ago
Ultimately I think that everything is just the vibrations of the aether. But it is also true that at the larger scale, vibrations can give form to matter which is smaller vibrations.
Not sure about that other question ... are you asking if galaxies and planets have sex? Not so far as I know. :-)
artynz 2 years ago
I love your presentation, Ray
It may be impossible for the waves to go to the dead centre; all movement would stop. Energy can neither be created or destroyed.
The agitation would be ever greater about the centre: the balancing centrifugal force becomes stronger than the inwardly spiralling centripetal force ...
... very refreshing alternative to the billiard ball thinking of the 19th century, still finding some support even today.
Thank you, much appreciated, John.
yoganandabailey 2 years ago
Thank you for your kind words John.
Certainly the centres of waves behave a bit differently. The non-linearity becomes extreme and cause refraction or scattering of waves. There is as a result a phase change as you pass through the centre.
artynz 2 years ago
the questions people are asking, they should watch all the videos first. people are wanting explanations for theories based on other theories that are based on other incorrect theories and blaming newer theories for not supporting the others. most science is just people of average intelligence studying the subject of science. ..problems haha ofcourse, education is so indiscriminate, titles are given to people who could have been football players, but they chose physics classes instead.
FROMOUTHERE 2 years ago
Thank you.
artynz 2 years ago
What are your credentials artynz?
I find this series most brilliant. What work has led to such insight? I also agree with fromouthere mainstream keeps it in the box. It is outside the box thinking that reveals insight. What is you view on evolution and cycles?
Thank you to your contribution to the free thinking.
drgreenmwdf 2 years ago
well said!!
drgreenmwdf 2 years ago
what causes the original vibration?
kamalmichael 2 years ago
We can never find a beginning nor even imagine one that is meaningful.
artynz 2 years ago
God Perhaps?
drgreenmwdf 2 years ago
The motion of the planets obeys an inverse square law with GR corrections to very high precision. If electric forces were involved (i.e if the planets had charge) then the difference would be very noticeable.
artynz 3 years ago
Another interesting video. This isn't relevant, but have you come across "Plasma Cosmology" and the "Electric Universe Theory"? That mite interest you possibly.
shrunkensimon 3 years ago
Yes, I have done a little reading on that. The ideas seem very realistic in explaining galaxy shapes for example, but the solar system works near enough to exclusively by gravity alone (except very small bodies).
The Harmonics Theory does not mind what the forces are, as they will have waves that are non-linear, which is its starting point.
artynz 3 years ago
Hmmm i have to disagree with you there. Gravity is a near infinite weak force, and can't even be used successfully (except in ignorance) to explain a working model of the Sun without contradictions/errors! Gravity only remains the predominant force/force of choice because of dogma, not because it is the truth of the situation.
shrunkensimon 3 years ago
How do you explain gravity?
4take4give 3 years ago
The non-linearity of the waves means that energy is always moving to smaller scale harmonics. The rate of this can be determined by the Hubble redshift (it is not expansion). From that rate the correct strength of gravity can be calculated because the outward wave is 1 part in 10^40 weaker than the inward wave. That tiny difference is gravity compared to the stronger forces.
artynz 3 years ago
so how do you know if the wave is moving or you are? What is the wave moving through? What is the wave made out of?
4take4give 3 years ago
The whole thing about relativity is that it looks the same no matter which is moving. There may be ways to get past that but it is very subtle. That is because we never see the aether that the waves are in. As Einstein said, you cannot put a mark on the aether. The wave is a distortion of the aether which may be thought of as a continuous substance that pervades the entire universe. Everything that exists is waves in the aether.
artynz 3 years ago
Regarding gravity: You say that the harmonics continue to propagate inward towards center, smaller distance, same energy (or more due to harmonics), rising frequency. Wouldn't this lead to an outward pressure, as experienced by a second "particle"? Gravity then would not be a sucking motion, but a blowing one.
seanthelight 3 years ago
sucking and blowing depends on where you think the "center" is. /me handwaves some more.
jogayot 3 years ago
The harmonics always have nigher frequency and therefore shorter wavelength. That means that the energy becomes concentrated about a smaller centre. So looking at any given wave, there is gradual contraction over time.
There is always both inwards and outwards flux. And the difference is extremely tiny.
artynz 3 years ago
Is there a practical limit to wavelength/frequency based on speed of light (pressure/wave propagation speed limit)?
ps. The big bong theory, ahahahaha. Good theory, funny name, have you gotten many stoner comments yet?
seanthelight 3 years ago
Fibonacci numbers and Fourier decomposition! :)
Saskachewan 3 years ago
The redshift of quasars is not gravitational. According to Arp and Narlikar, it is new matter and has lower frequencies (hence looks redshifted) due to its newness and gradually the frequencies increase as the waves of that matter come in contact with other matter waves at the speed of light.
artynz 3 years ago
Interesting title: How to make a universe. Which begs the questions of how did the universe get made? Where did the ether come from? And some mysteries; what is the nature of the very numerous faint blue galaxies, which are quite distant? Why do you feel the red shift of quasars is gravitational rather than cosmological? If quasars are emitted from galaxies then how can their gravity red shifts be greater than the emitting galaxy, assuming that both are close to each other?
spacetimewarp 3 years ago
... I have performed simulations and this does happen for dimensions above 1D. There is a heap of empirical evidence for the other waves. I will post videos in the future about two of these where both the inter-nodal distances and cycles periods have been independently observed - specifically, the 586 million year cycle and the set at 160, 80, 6 and 3 minutes. Watch for these. The electron etc are the Johnny-come-latelies of the Universe.
Ray
artynz 4 years ago
Hi Geoff, thanks for your comments. And yet the pattern of cycles periods (or frequencies) observed in the Universe is exactly what is predicted by such an assumption. Maybe it can come about a slightly different way. Non-linearity causes harmonics - it is a simple mathematical fact. The new wave centres are formed as harmonics between the original ones exactly as you can have nodes on a guitar string that is only fixed at the two ends. ..
artynz 4 years ago
Hi Ray,
Metaphysics / dynamic unity of reality requires that space (wave medium) must be infinite (as only one substance existing cannot be created or bounded by anything else).
Harmonic theory - I just cannot agree that the universe arose from one wave that harmonically decays - I see no mechanism of energy exchange to create more wave centers - and no empirical evidence of all these other frequencies (the electron / positron seems fundamental).
Geoff
physics1philosophy 4 years ago
"I just cannot agree that the universe arose from one wave that harmonically decays - I see no mechanism of energy exchange to create more wave centers"
There are three ways the wave can propagate:
1. Infinite Universe
Wave propagates further and further, still expanding. But it prevents it to reflect at the end and come back to make a standing wave.
2. Finite Universe
Wave propagates to its end and comes back. But why it reflects at the edge? What is further?
And third way:
Saskachewan 3 years ago
3. Wrapped Universe
Its edges are wrapped up in higher dimensions to make a closed loop in all directions. If a wave propagates in this kind of universe it'll always wrap up and return, same if it reflected. Then it'll produce a standing wave with its own center :> [both nodes are the same point].
Hawking suggested that our Universe is on a surface of hypersphere. This kind of sphere is finite and infinite in the same time. If it expands, wave could change its frequency and produce harmonics.
Saskachewan 3 years ago
@Saskachewan Certainly it is easier to understand if the universe is finite or wrapped. However even in known extended systems waves develop depending on conditions. For example ocean waves.
artynz 1 year ago
@Saskachewan The non-linearity of the universal wave equation causes harmonics to develop. This is well known physics. What is not well known is that in 3D these harmonics will make new wave centres. That does not happen in 1D.
artynz 1 year ago
@artynz: Are you sure? ;) I have a hint for you: intermodulation and beating. There is a little known formula from trigonometry which allows to change multiplication of sines/cosines into sum and difference, and vice versa. Sum and difference are obviously linear, as is wave interference. But multiplication is modulation, and is related to non-linear wave media. But if you can interchange one another mathematically, what does it mean? :> Give it a thought :) It's quite enlightening.
Saskachewan 1 year ago