I was not saying ANYTHING about the S2 vs. the MS3 as vehicles; no need for rudimentary car specs comparisons, S2 is a King in the twisty stuff . Don't own, but had the please of driving multiple examples of AP1 and 2.
-I was talking about why adding forced induction by way of a turbo on a S2, would add A LOT more power than what is made w/ similar boost levels in the MS3.
-Point was, No Shit! Boosted S2's make massive gains with modest boost. Don't take my engine based comment as S2k hate.
The compression ratio w/ the oem S2 would make a TON more power per PSI than the lower compression MZr 2.3.... your comment does not make sense for an empirical comparison.
The S2k was built SPECIFICALLY for n/a power, very high tech engine from the factory...... you act like Honda just tossed in some basic N/A motor........ how about price match the MS3 + bolt ons with a turbo kit'd S2k.
@eeeen321 The s2k motor would use the same turbo as the mazda. I know I have one. My comment makes perfect sense. Everyone always tries to compare other cars to the S2k when they cannot. I know exactly why the s2k was made and drag racing was not it. I don't care about price, an MS3 with bolt ons could never keed up with a turboed s2k through the twisties. Sorry man your logic is flawed, I would pay the price for a perfect handling s2k stock over a modded ms3. Thats why I did!
yea they only accelerated it seems for only 2gears worth, maybe about 1 1/2gears. only till about 60-70mph. the s2000 and the ms3 are closely matched. its going to always be a drivers race, and most honda drivers dont know how to keep their cars in their powerband so torque isnt needed. mazda has the turbo so shifting speed isnt soo important becuase of their superior torque to the S2000. stock the S2000 SHOULD be quicker and faster, granted driver knows what he's doing
im not saying s2000 are slow cuz a race between an s2000 and mazdspeed 3 is a drivers race but it really doesnt look like the speed 3 is racing the mph on the dash is moving like a turtle
the s2k is 300 pounds lighter. and because honda has a better power distribution to the wheels, the power ratings should be even, if not, the s2k should have the advantage there also.
torque is great to have, but if your all motor youre depending mostly on horsepower all the way to redline, especially if you have vtec.
wow man seriously its vids like this that tick pploff iv never seen a car with 0! torque beat a 280ftq u realy do suck at driving . and learn to shit ur shifting like a grama
turbo hondas should be taken lightly. most hondas are NA which is why not many people take them lightly. any boosted vtec could keep up or even walk a ms3 on LOW boost.
i have an ms3 and i know what times to shift. i've raced against a sc'ed s2k and a boosted s2k. both were tuned by bisimoto and i got walked.
this video is close, but the s2k could easily pull on top.
What technology? Honda has SH and SHAWD, ACE body structure and the best crash scores andthe Accord had the first navigation system in a production car
AWD? how exclusive. brand names put on regular technology don't make it any better. everyones got a name for their body/impact structure programs. Mazda's is called MAGMA, big whoop. That accord you talk about had a navi system that was like a G-tech. It was actually Mazda that had the first GPS navi system in the Cosmo, as well as a touchscreen tv with onscreen controls, phone etc. all in 1990. It was also the first car in japan to use a bus-based integration system, like what CANBUS is today
and the s2000 weighs 2200Lbs. vs. the MS3 weighing in at almost 1000Lbs. heavier. I love the looks of the Honda. I traded an '02 s2000 in for the MS3. I still am a Honda fanboy, but the stock s2000 doesn't hold a candle to a stock MS3. The torque of the MS3 is outstanding for a FWD sports compact. I own an '08 MS3 stock, and have dusted every single s2000 that has tried to hang with me. I really did enjoy driving the RWD s2000 in the twistys. Both are great cars in their own way!
I know both are good cars. But next time look up your info. The S2000 weighs around 2840lbs that's like only 300lbs lighter, not 1000lbs lighter. The awesome thing is the S2000 is naturally aspired 4 cylinder. Whereas the Mazda would be a slow 4 cylinder if it weren't for that turbo on it. But don't get me wrong. Both are good cars.
You're right. The car does weigh 2809 - 2855 depending on the trim. Honda has great engineering. I enjoyed mine while I had it. It's hard to compare a FWD against a RWD car. I live in the Northern East Coast, so my MS3 is parked until Spring. Also, the naturally aspired 4 cylinder is very nice indeed, but would have to undergo serious mods to s/c or t/c it if you wanted it to last for more than 30K miles. Both have there pros and cons. Thanks for correcting me on the weight.
OKAY GUYS stop comparing MS3 to like 03 models of 350z that were issued in the year of God damn 2002 in december ok? you want to compare cars than go look at videos of 07+ yr model 350z vs MS3 I gurantee you the MS3 would get raped go look up 07 350z vs 09 MS3 than go look up 07 350z vs MS3 videos man 07 + yr 350z are droppin that Ms3 to the piece of s2k or civic SI garbage it is. Peace
@luvchiild "dumbass" ?? Where the fuck does that come from?
What in the hell do their Ring times have to do with the ms3 shifting early due to power band??? And better yet, what in the hell do their Ring times have to do with pulling in a line?
You are just vomiting out random numbers that are not only pointless in this conversation, they are inapplicable to what I said... lol? S M A R T
Your comment is retarded, and so are you for trying to talk shit for no reason.
@eeeen321 dont get all butthurt because you are wrong nancy... the fact of the matter is this video is bullshit because the speed3 needs a driver mod. Do you read car and driver or motor trend? If you do or you can read for that matter you would look at the numbers which have very much to do with this convo and better yet this video. Speed3 does 0-60 in 5.3 sec. S2000 does it in 6.3-6.4. That is a full second faster. S2000 with these mods will not make it 1 full second faster.
You're ignorant. The S2000 runs 13.8/13.9 bone stock. People are running 13.4-13.6 with just test pipe, exhaust, possibly intake. That's without a tune. An S/C s2k with a Novi 1200 kit with supporting mods (stock motor) produces right around 400whp and traps about 115+. So tell me how a 115 trap = a 13 second pass? You are truly and idiot.
@IAmTheRealAsif clearly... since I am sure you have owned both cars like I have and work at a performance shop that sees every single type of sports car you can imagine.
So what do you think an s2000 runs stock? You know NOTHING about cars. Teary eyed? You're an idiot LOL. I own and S2000. I do not take the bus. Look through my channel, you will see the car. Fool.
@IAmTheRealAsif Yup keep telling yourself that kid... I am not wasting my time with someone who takes the bus... go cry about your imaginary s2000 being faster than it really is to someone who actually gives two shits. The last thing I am going to do is look through your channel LOL. Maybe one day you will save up enough money to buy a geo metro.
@luvchiild Believe whatever you want. It's really obvious you aren't too smart when it comes to cars. You can't call me a liar when I have proof you refuse to look at. Fool.
@eeeen321 So to sum it all up your comment of "an oem MS3 should rape an intake and exhaust S2K" is fucking retarded because they do... better yet I do... I own a speed3 with a intake and I smoke S2000 all day long with I/H/E.
@luvchiild your a fucking angry dork. I said an OEM ms3 should beat an s2k with bolt ons... and they do, with the "driver mod" you talked about. I don't know what you are bitching about. You have not even made a relevant point in regards to my comments.
This video is crap, like I have said, and you are an angry fool. Shut your fingers down and read before you vomit out more angry bullshit misdirected at someone who was saying this video is BS from the start.
Honda FTW. Honda technology is greater than Mazda not that they are bad. Too bad Honda cars with Direct Injection are only in Japan so far, but honda gets good power and efficiency without Di so with DI oh man that'd be sweet
Don't even compare it to the S2000...Why not? They both have the same lap times at the same track except for the S2000 had a professional driver and the Mazdaspeed 3 had an inexperienced driver which means the Mazdaspeed 3's times could have been better.
Check out the Nürburgring lap times:
8:39 Honda S2000 Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (01/2000)
8:39 Mazdaspeed3(MPS) Mark Ticehurst 2007 Mazda News (06/2007)[18] Inexperienced driver.
i love the s2000 and i own an rx8, ive seen a few races between these two amazing machines, and the ms3 took them all, so i dont know about this driver. but sick cars, im guna trade in my rx for and s2k pretty soon.
i own both cars my speed 3 is stock and my s2000 has intake headers exhaust and fuel pressure regulator.. my speed 3 is faster from a roll if i break boost if not then its dead even most people dont know how to drive speed 3's
I'd have to say i've thought about the match up alot. I would have to reserve my judgment until there are a wider variety of upgrades for the speed3. having said that I think those results would have been different on track with some pos- reac times and a better driver.
you must take into account the cars that could have been in the lane of either driver, if you're trying to get any kind of cred for racing on a crowdy fwy then you should go buy a casket
Did the MS3 start in 5th gear or something?You can see the mph gauge and its barely even moving.Ive race a few S2000 and I never lost,They werent even close.
I looked at it agian and think that either the driver in the MS3 wasnt tring or needs driving lessons in a big way..How do you make your mph go up so slowly?
wow, I'm guessing the s2000 was honking, he definatly honked really quickly on the last two and got a jump on the speed3, if it wasn't for that, it would have been even.
you shift way too late, this is embarrasing video. make sure you shift at 5500rpm, you loose a lot of power like that. if your still stock, then power shift.
but dont u have a turbo already and ur both 4cyl.? give the s2k the credit this time, ur mazda aint shit without that turbo.
now lets see the s2k go turbo and then add cai and cat-delete....AND u with cai and cat delete, sorry dude, but u will see his tail-lights all night long. dont worry, i aint hating, my friend has a speed 3 and hes stock and he beats my stock ap2 s2k, not by much, but hes a good driver. try flat shifting and shift at 5000 like he does.
that is the most ricer thing I've heard in a long time "just slap a turbo on it and it will be fast" To safely add a turbo to the s2000 engine will take alot of work. The stock s2000 is a highly tuned high compression engine, and to safely run a turbo, you will have to lower compression and retune the computer. The s2000 might run safely around 6psi with that set up which will be around 250-300 whp.
Eat caca... you have a big mouth for someone who takes the bus
luvchiild 5 months ago
DRIVER MOD PLEASE!
lowrider121990 9 months ago
I was not saying ANYTHING about the S2 vs. the MS3 as vehicles; no need for rudimentary car specs comparisons, S2 is a King in the twisty stuff . Don't own, but had the please of driving multiple examples of AP1 and 2.
-I was talking about why adding forced induction by way of a turbo on a S2, would add A LOT more power than what is made w/ similar boost levels in the MS3.
-Point was, No Shit! Boosted S2's make massive gains with modest boost. Don't take my engine based comment as S2k hate.
eeeen321 1 year ago
Ahh... another video showing a turbo vs. non turbo. Turbo the S2000 then take the video, enough said.
whiteknightef 1 year ago
@whiteknightef lol, like that makes any sense!
The compression ratio w/ the oem S2 would make a TON more power per PSI than the lower compression MZr 2.3.... your comment does not make sense for an empirical comparison.
The S2k was built SPECIFICALLY for n/a power, very high tech engine from the factory...... you act like Honda just tossed in some basic N/A motor........ how about price match the MS3 + bolt ons with a turbo kit'd S2k.
eeeen321 1 year ago
@eeeen321 The s2k motor would use the same turbo as the mazda. I know I have one. My comment makes perfect sense. Everyone always tries to compare other cars to the S2k when they cannot. I know exactly why the s2k was made and drag racing was not it. I don't care about price, an MS3 with bolt ons could never keed up with a turboed s2k through the twisties. Sorry man your logic is flawed, I would pay the price for a perfect handling s2k stock over a modded ms3. Thats why I did!
whiteknightef 1 year ago
you really need to learn how to shift........I always get ahead of S2K on my MS3
Antartic440 1 year ago
yea they only accelerated it seems for only 2gears worth, maybe about 1 1/2gears. only till about 60-70mph. the s2000 and the ms3 are closely matched. its going to always be a drivers race, and most honda drivers dont know how to keep their cars in their powerband so torque isnt needed. mazda has the turbo so shifting speed isnt soo important becuase of their superior torque to the S2000. stock the S2000 SHOULD be quicker and faster, granted driver knows what he's doing
Dickotine 1 year ago
That should not of happened. MS3s are a good bit faster than the S2K.
Mach1Spd 1 year ago
Sorry, MS3 isn't racing or the guy is dreaming to some girl.
fastcougar3200 2 years ago
i just realized that speed3 isnt even racing look at his tach ive driven a speed 3 and that needle wasnt even moving up...
elements8er1234 2 years ago
You can believe that bs if you want to lol.We all know the truth !!!
bustacap12 2 years ago
im not saying s2000 are slow cuz a race between an s2000 and mazdspeed 3 is a drivers race but it really doesnt look like the speed 3 is racing the mph on the dash is moving like a turtle
elements8er1234 2 years ago
you can't see the tach, you see the speedo, and it moves up roughly 20 mph while you can see it. this is an owner speaking.
MadManDrivinHere 2 years ago
i like both cars but the MS3 is more practical then the S2000, don't worry im not bias, i drive a Civic Si
BucSteven 2 years ago
the s2k is 300 pounds lighter. and because honda has a better power distribution to the wheels, the power ratings should be even, if not, the s2k should have the advantage there also.
torque is great to have, but if your all motor youre depending mostly on horsepower all the way to redline, especially if you have vtec.
akala123 2 years ago
wow man seriously its vids like this that tick pploff iv never seen a car with 0! torque beat a 280ftq u realy do suck at driving . and learn to shit ur shifting like a grama
farsi112 2 years ago
lol you need more experience racing.
turbo hondas should be taken lightly. most hondas are NA which is why not many people take them lightly. any boosted vtec could keep up or even walk a ms3 on LOW boost.
i have an ms3 and i know what times to shift. i've raced against a sc'ed s2k and a boosted s2k. both were tuned by bisimoto and i got walked.
this video is close, but the s2k could easily pull on top.
akala123 2 years ago
and you talk like a small child
whathefmate 2 years ago
you're also comparing a 25k car max to a 32k s2000. 2 completely different price ranges. If i pay 7k more i would hope to get the faster car.
pangaliciouspenguin 2 years ago
N/A Honda engine prevails once more.
xitup1 2 years ago
What technology? Honda has SH and SHAWD, ACE body structure and the best crash scores andthe Accord had the first navigation system in a production car
MaddDogg81 2 years ago
AWD? how exclusive. brand names put on regular technology don't make it any better. everyones got a name for their body/impact structure programs. Mazda's is called MAGMA, big whoop. That accord you talk about had a navi system that was like a G-tech. It was actually Mazda that had the first GPS navi system in the Cosmo, as well as a touchscreen tv with onscreen controls, phone etc. all in 1990. It was also the first car in japan to use a bus-based integration system, like what CANBUS is today
youngbleeb 2 years ago
Honda ftw !!!
bustacap12 3 years ago
VTEC!! LOL!!
NSX00000 3 years ago
Bull shit the speed was in the wrong gear speedo barely moving look again.Guy cant drive.
chug1966 3 years ago 3
And the s2000 doesn't even have a turbo.. That's sad.
marqedwin 3 years ago
and the s2000 weighs 2200Lbs. vs. the MS3 weighing in at almost 1000Lbs. heavier. I love the looks of the Honda. I traded an '02 s2000 in for the MS3. I still am a Honda fanboy, but the stock s2000 doesn't hold a candle to a stock MS3. The torque of the MS3 is outstanding for a FWD sports compact. I own an '08 MS3 stock, and have dusted every single s2000 that has tried to hang with me. I really did enjoy driving the RWD s2000 in the twistys. Both are great cars in their own way!
glitchhappy 3 years ago
I know both are good cars. But next time look up your info. The S2000 weighs around 2840lbs that's like only 300lbs lighter, not 1000lbs lighter. The awesome thing is the S2000 is naturally aspired 4 cylinder. Whereas the Mazda would be a slow 4 cylinder if it weren't for that turbo on it. But don't get me wrong. Both are good cars.
marqedwin 3 years ago
You're right. The car does weigh 2809 - 2855 depending on the trim. Honda has great engineering. I enjoyed mine while I had it. It's hard to compare a FWD against a RWD car. I live in the Northern East Coast, so my MS3 is parked until Spring. Also, the naturally aspired 4 cylinder is very nice indeed, but would have to undergo serious mods to s/c or t/c it if you wanted it to last for more than 30K miles. Both have there pros and cons. Thanks for correcting me on the weight.
glitchhappy 3 years ago
OKAY GUYS stop comparing MS3 to like 03 models of 350z that were issued in the year of God damn 2002 in december ok? you want to compare cars than go look at videos of 07+ yr model 350z vs MS3 I gurantee you the MS3 would get raped go look up 07 350z vs 09 MS3 than go look up 07 350z vs MS3 videos man 07 + yr 350z are droppin that Ms3 to the piece of s2k or civic SI garbage it is. Peace
Noorie0 2 years ago
I kill s2ks straight up but you have to shift at 5500 in the ms3 stock..
tahil23 3 years ago 4
vid was taken few weeks after i got the car nd couldn't drive it so well
xnbastar1669 3 years ago
Ms3's get peak torque at 3k so try to race at 3-4 k and you will take off alot faster. It looked like you were in 5th trying to race?
werkroks 3 years ago
@tahil23 falls on the FACE!!!! lol... I agree, an oem MS3 should rape an intake and exhaust S2k, in a strait line.
eeeen321 1 year ago 2
@eeeen321 hey dumbass go check nurburgring lap times... they both did 8.39 seconds around the track.
luvchiild 5 months ago
@luvchiild "dumbass" ?? Where the fuck does that come from?
What in the hell do their Ring times have to do with the ms3 shifting early due to power band??? And better yet, what in the hell do their Ring times have to do with pulling in a line?
You are just vomiting out random numbers that are not only pointless in this conversation, they are inapplicable to what I said... lol? S M A R T
Your comment is retarded, and so are you for trying to talk shit for no reason.
eeeen321 5 months ago 2
@eeeen321 dont get all butthurt because you are wrong nancy... the fact of the matter is this video is bullshit because the speed3 needs a driver mod. Do you read car and driver or motor trend? If you do or you can read for that matter you would look at the numbers which have very much to do with this convo and better yet this video. Speed3 does 0-60 in 5.3 sec. S2000 does it in 6.3-6.4. That is a full second faster. S2000 with these mods will not make it 1 full second faster.
luvchiild 5 months ago
@luvchiild LMAO. An s2k does 0-60 in 5.8 seconds. And they run high 13's stock. Some have managed a 13.8 stock.
IAmTheRealAsif 4 months ago
@IAmTheRealAsif Maybe with a supercharger son... S2000 are slooooooooooow
luvchiild 4 months ago
@luvchiild
You're ignorant. The S2000 runs 13.8/13.9 bone stock. People are running 13.4-13.6 with just test pipe, exhaust, possibly intake. That's without a tune. An S/C s2k with a Novi 1200 kit with supporting mods (stock motor) produces right around 400whp and traps about 115+. So tell me how a 115 trap = a 13 second pass? You are truly and idiot.
IAmTheRealAsif 4 months ago
@IAmTheRealAsif clearly... since I am sure you have owned both cars like I have and work at a performance shop that sees every single type of sports car you can imagine.
luvchiild 4 months ago
@luvchiild Everybody on youtube owned every car and works for an F1 race team. Fact is you are still an idiot.
IAmTheRealAsif 4 months ago
@IAmTheRealAsif I am speaking for myself son. Just because you take the bus doesnt mean you need to get all teary eyed
luvchiild 4 months ago
@luvchiild
So what do you think an s2000 runs stock? You know NOTHING about cars. Teary eyed? You're an idiot LOL. I own and S2000. I do not take the bus. Look through my channel, you will see the car. Fool.
IAmTheRealAsif 4 months ago
@IAmTheRealAsif Yup keep telling yourself that kid... I am not wasting my time with someone who takes the bus... go cry about your imaginary s2000 being faster than it really is to someone who actually gives two shits. The last thing I am going to do is look through your channel LOL. Maybe one day you will save up enough money to buy a geo metro.
luvchiild 4 months ago
@luvchiild Believe whatever you want. It's really obvious you aren't too smart when it comes to cars. You can't call me a liar when I have proof you refuse to look at. Fool.
IAmTheRealAsif 4 months ago
@luvchiild BTW wasting your time? You're on youtube making stupid comments that make no sense anyway. You're already wasting your time.
IAmTheRealAsif 4 months ago
@IAmTheRealAsif sure thing
luvchiild 4 months ago
@eeeen321 So to sum it all up your comment of "an oem MS3 should rape an intake and exhaust S2K" is fucking retarded because they do... better yet I do... I own a speed3 with a intake and I smoke S2000 all day long with I/H/E.
luvchiild 5 months ago
@luvchiild your a fucking angry dork. I said an OEM ms3 should beat an s2k with bolt ons... and they do, with the "driver mod" you talked about. I don't know what you are bitching about. You have not even made a relevant point in regards to my comments.
This video is crap, like I have said, and you are an angry fool. Shut your fingers down and read before you vomit out more angry bullshit misdirected at someone who was saying this video is BS from the start.
eeeen321 5 months ago
Nice Vid.
frankie73kgt 3 years ago
s2k ftw !! Fcuk zoom,zoom lol.
bustacap12 3 years ago
lol
frankie73kgt 3 years ago
i need to get another s2k vs ms3 vid up, i raced this s2k about 3 weeks after getting my car. and btw the ms3 is my first manual car
xnbastar1669 3 years ago
any plans for an intake and full exhaust? ull own that s2k then btw
praetorian2150 3 years ago
already have a cai and rear mount. bushings were ordered yesterday and race pipe should be here by the end of the week
xnbastar1669 3 years ago
nice wat brand cai?
praetorian2150 3 years ago
mazdaspeed
xnbastar1669 3 years ago
uu nice this one seemed to be a lot harder than other hondas eh? lol nice race
Dani01c 3 years ago
yeah s2k's are good competition for the ms3. civics dont stand a chance unless turboed
praetorian2150 3 years ago
mabe it is but fow long it will last....its not a daily driver
wisniaPl628 3 years ago
in Modified Mag there is an S2000 that is 400whp on stock internals
MaddDogg81 3 years ago
Honda FTW. Honda technology is greater than Mazda not that they are bad. Too bad Honda cars with Direct Injection are only in Japan so far, but honda gets good power and efficiency without Di so with DI oh man that'd be sweet
MaddDogg81 3 years ago
ya what technology has honda come up with since vtec?
youngbleeb 2 years ago
ms akward looking? do you like new sti?? because they copied ms3
wisniaPl628 3 years ago
i have a ms3 and i have raced a bunch of s2ks all i have to say is if this guy leared how to drive his car then he should beat this guy
cuz when i race s2ks i beat them by like 1 and half if they got mods
farsi112 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I like Mazdas, but the 3 is an awkward looking car. It's too tall, too narrow, and too short.
logwind 3 years ago
Too tall and too short. Excellent.
FireStorm4056 3 years ago 2
lol
xnbastar1669 3 years ago
I dig both of those cars, but I've got a real soft spot for S2Ks.
IHeartGroceries 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
go s2k !!!
nayil100 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck mazda speed 3s (they are fucking wagon ugly) dont even compare it to s2000 [please]
DinoMendoza 3 years ago
Don't even compare it to the S2000...Why not? They both have the same lap times at the same track except for the S2000 had a professional driver and the Mazdaspeed 3 had an inexperienced driver which means the Mazdaspeed 3's times could have been better.
Check out the Nürburgring lap times:
8:39 Honda S2000 Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (01/2000)
8:39 Mazdaspeed3(MPS) Mark Ticehurst 2007 Mazda News (06/2007)[18] Inexperienced driver.
smadamaf 3 years ago
i love the s2000 and i own an rx8, ive seen a few races between these two amazing machines, and the ms3 took them all, so i dont know about this driver. but sick cars, im guna trade in my rx for and s2k pretty soon.
aesaetadrums 3 years ago
i own both cars my speed 3 is stock and my s2000 has intake headers exhaust and fuel pressure regulator.. my speed 3 is faster from a roll if i break boost if not then its dead even most people dont know how to drive speed 3's
123freddy 3 years ago
WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED HERE
Frank15032000 3 years ago
owning an ms3, and being fans of both cars..
I'd have to say i've thought about the match up alot. I would have to reserve my judgment until there are a wider variety of upgrades for the speed3. having said that I think those results would have been different on track with some pos- reac times and a better driver.
abbadonone 3 years ago
you must take into account the cars that could have been in the lane of either driver, if you're trying to get any kind of cred for racing on a crowdy fwy then you should go buy a casket
abbadonone 3 years ago
I agree with everyone, you started in the wrong gear or something. It moved from 50-60 in like 4 seconds. Did you start in top gear or something?
theguy1224 3 years ago
wat gear was the speed in?5th? like john said...it accelerated really slow...
08MS3uknw 3 years ago
Did the MS3 start in 5th gear or something?You can see the mph gauge and its barely even moving.Ive race a few S2000 and I never lost,They werent even close.
sharkdiverjohn 3 years ago
I looked at it agian and think that either the driver in the MS3 wasnt tring or needs driving lessons in a big way..How do you make your mph go up so slowly?
sharkdiverjohn 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK MAN I know. But hey, do u want to watch TV on ur PC
You'll get all the SKY CHANNELS there is
AND from any country IN THE WORLD, on your pc screen!!!!
Go to this website...
frexis.*com/PCTV14.html
(DELETE the *)
check it out................its cool, i've got it myself.
joogzjj 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK MAN I know. But hey, do u want to watch TV on ur PC
You'll get all the SKY CHANNELS there is
AND from any country IN THE WORLD, on your pc screen!!!!
Go to this website...
frexis.*com/PCTV2.html
(DELETE the *)
check it out................its cool, i've got it myself.
ajona1234 3 years ago
Good comparison s2000 def walked on that one
ccann26 3 years ago
wow, I'm guessing the s2000 was honking, he definatly honked really quickly on the last two and got a jump on the speed3, if it wasn't for that, it would have been even.
Alexsered 3 years ago
s2k honked, either way he would have pulled on me
xnbastar1669 3 years ago
I dont know, pulling away that slowly when he got a head start, looks like it would be even if the start was even.
Alexsered 3 years ago
ms3 bov and intake and u will walk thAT s2k.. oh yeah...BREAK BOOST!!!!!!!
bigjd0420 3 years ago 2
wth does a bov have to do with anything? bovs are a useless mod, unless ur running a higher boost and the stock is leaking.
but ms3 ftw.... better luck next time
floopyliangchu 2 years ago
you shift way too late, this is embarrasing video. make sure you shift at 5500rpm, you loose a lot of power like that. if your still stock, then power shift.
sleserginekolog1 3 years ago 2
first off i shift around 5600, when power starts dropping off, sexond you can't even see the rpm side of the tach in the vid
xnbastar1669 3 years ago
mazdaspeed for the lose all night long! you can see the s2000 hit the breaks! good run tho. s2000's are ms3 killers! lol
lilmama9978 3 years ago
let me throw on a cai and de-cat my car and we'll see what happens
xnbastar1669 3 years ago
but dont u have a turbo already and ur both 4cyl.? give the s2k the credit this time, ur mazda aint shit without that turbo.
now lets see the s2k go turbo and then add cai and cat-delete....AND u with cai and cat delete, sorry dude, but u will see his tail-lights all night long. dont worry, i aint hating, my friend has a speed 3 and hes stock and he beats my stock ap2 s2k, not by much, but hes a good driver. try flat shifting and shift at 5000 like he does.
monkeys2sale 3 years ago
that is the most ricer thing I've heard in a long time "just slap a turbo on it and it will be fast" To safely add a turbo to the s2000 engine will take alot of work. The stock s2000 is a highly tuned high compression engine, and to safely run a turbo, you will have to lower compression and retune the computer. The s2000 might run safely around 6psi with that set up which will be around 250-300 whp.
Alexsered 3 years ago
stock vs. stock, the ms3 will win. I own an ap2 btw.
supayello 3 years ago 2
Mazdaspeed 3 for the win all night long!!!
smadamaf 3 years ago
how you loose to a s2000.u need a little bolt ons
akatopj22 3 years ago
Mazdaspeed - get a intake ASAP
BmoreFast 3 years ago