Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (80)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations"

    Jesuitical pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating

    The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda 2 discredit the Bible. Papal Rome cant have a satanic Despotism of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible

  • It sounds like he say Bill craig, also almost every time I hear it in context to William L Craig. Am I mistaken?

  • lol hahaha love that scream

  • the scream is pretty funny.

  • Dawkins may be afraid of meeting Craig in an elevator but women need to be afraid of meeting dawkins in one.

  • @ivlfounder LOL! yeah, i heard about that incident. Very wrong form for Dawkins. As far as I can tell, he's a misogynistic jerk.

  • @drcraigvideos what's that incident? never heard of that

  • @mygeekystuff I believe a colleague of Dawkins was in an elevator with a girl. His colleague propisitioned her in the elevator to, uh, "just talk" with her alone in her hotel room past midnight! She took it as a flirtatious pass, turned him down, and blogged about it. It went viral. And Dawkins (who stuck up for hs colleague) wrote about it and thought she was overreacting and stupid.

  • @drcraigvideos oh fine, thanks for the info.

  • @drcraigvideos Richard Dawkins of The God Delusion is arguably the most unpleasant character in all non-fiction.

  • @TheSeanWilson The most unpleasant character in all fiction actually.

  • If Dawkins doesn't debate he will lose most of his credibility, which is not exactly a bad thing given his poisonous anti theistic tone.

  • Skeptics are irrational by definition. Their reasoning, if any, is confused and circular. This is why Dawkins will never debate Craig. Chick-a-boom-chick-a-boom.

  • If Dawkins and Craig were to debate it would be a slaughter. Dawkins sophomoric understanding of Theology and Philosophy would come back to bite him if he was to EVER debate Craig, and Dawkins Knows it, so i can understand why Dawkins is avoiding him at all costs. However...i would looooove to see a debate between Michael Martin and Craig on the existence of God; that would be lively!

  • Dawkins doesn't debate dummies no matter how much education they have. It's like debating someone who has a doctorate but believes that Star Wars actually happened and Lucas is a prophet. We have the movies and they say that this happened a long time ago in a galaxy far away so it must be true. Besides Hitchens already demolished craig and it's not polite to kick a man when he's already been beaten.

  • @TheCraich If Dawkins doesn't debate "dummies" then why did he debate "dummies" (like Lennox, McGrath, etc.) anyway? And if Hitches did so good why are most of his fans saying he lost? Did you even watch that debate? Hitchens ditched his closing statement. He got creamed. Seriously, dude, be fair. And please watch the video next time, ok?

  • @drcraigvideos I think I watched that debate. Biola uni right? Where Craig asked to show that "atheism is true". He didn't even understand what Hitch's position was for half the debate. Even in his closing argument he starts: "Have we seen any argument to think that god does not exist?" *facedesk* *facedesk* *facedesk*.

  • @Scraxs Actually, if you listened to the debate, Hitchens didn't get his own view on atheism right: watch?v=AHIIjfxr4o0. *ROLLS EYES*

  • @drcraigvideos Put semantic disagreements aside. Theists tend to use the word atheist differently then those people who actually adopt the label. The point is Craig imposes his own definition "that Hitchens believes there's no god", creating a straw man through the whole debate. Rather than accepting that Hitchen's doesn't believe what Craig initially thought he did.

  • @Scraxs *BIG LONG SIGH* Maybe if you actually listened to the debate you'd know that Hitchens often switched his definition of atheism. Please, try to be fair, ok?

  • @drcraigvideos You must be thinking of when he said: "atheism is the proposition that a certain statement isn't true" at the time I just gave the benefit of the doubt and thought he made a mistake or meant that the proposition is that the statement "I believe in a god" isn't true. But to be fair that doesn't look like what he meant.

  • @drcraigvideos you should reference atheists to the debate between Dr. Craig and Austin Dacey when they mistake the definition of atheism. Dacey gives arguments against god because he is an actual philosopher, so he knows what it really means to be an atheist. Even though his arguments were not very strong.

  • @agnostic7764 I think Austin Dacey is one of the few philosopher atheists out there that's actually pretty good!

  • @TheCraich Wow, you're hilarious!

  • @TheCraich Dawkins will never debate Craig. Dawkins is no fool. He KNOWS he is a good biology professor but a sorry philosopher and thinker. He is afraid to death of Craig. Period.

  • I knew it!! ... Beneath the slithery scaly exterior DickDawk is actually a chihuahua.

  • lol

  • One of the best videos on youtube!

  • By the moment Lennox scared Dawkins into infidel forums, atheism was intellectually dead.

  • Lmao! Dr. Craig would totally own Dawkins in a debate... awesome video man!

  • Has anybody seen the movie Devil, where these people were trapped in the elevator? Aw I wish this would happen in real life, craig and dawkins trapped in the elevator for hours, without there being any blood and killing of course.

  • AHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!! That was hilarious! Excellent video! Just want to add that Dawkins thoughts on the girl in the elevator is just sick.

  • The Homer Simpson scream cracked me up

  • Probably one of the funniest vids on youtube

  • He won't show...

  • @Soul4JC Let's pray he does :)

  • Excellently done.

  • CLA-SSIC! Love it ;D

  • Apparently Dawkins doesn't fear Craig nearly as much as Craigs fans fear open discussion.

  • @DemolishedByNeglect Well, if youtube atheists can learn how to reach puberty, or if they can be respectful, or if they can actually watch the video, or if they can stop with the drive-by comments, etc. maybe open discussion would be possible.

  • @drcraigvideos Actually the only thing preventing open discussion is censorship on your part.

  • @DemolishedByNeglect I fail to see how blocking immature ignoramouses with IQs that haven't gone past 70 accounts for my wanting to set the First Amendment on fire.

  • @drcraigvideos Don't expect skeptics to make any sense at all..

  • @DemolishedByNeglect Bullshit. The only thing preventing a discussion is the lack of education on youtube-atheists' part. Wannabes, who pluck quotes here and there and can't form a valid statement of their own. It's a plague. 

  • @DemolishedByNeglect dawkins and his utube atheist dufus possey are cowards. u guys saw what happened to Hitchens and harris, how they got pimp slapped and dawkins chickenshit "I will only debate a bishop" dodge is laughable

  • As long as I won't see a debate between Dr Craig and Prof. Dawkins, I will still doubt about God and atheism. Btw what is the music?

  • @Boromir33 Beethoven's 7th Symphony, 2nd Movement

  • @Boromir33

    Beethoven, Symphony 7, Allegretto, mvt 2

  • @Birdieupon Thank you very much :)

  • @Boromir33

    I do believe the music is from 'The Kings Speech'.

  • Brilliant...i think the only thing left to do is show up at Dawkin's house with a camera and some chairs and debate him there.

  • LOL

  • I'm not a Christian, but I do think Dr. Craig has some pretty good arguments, and his historical writings on Jesus are really interesting. Dawkins, of course, should be frightened by him, he's the only person challenging Dawkins' viewpoint and doing a good job at it. And yeah, South Park's criticism on atheism was genius.

  • What came first the Chicken or Richard Dawkins? Bock bock bock bock bock Bock Bock Bock Bock Bock Bock Bock Bock

  • Not bad... not bad :D

    He wont show up though, he has made a career out of debating weak opponents. I think he is legitimately afraid of this debate.

  • HAHAHAHAHA This, sir/madam, is PURE GENIUS.

  • @thorkyll Birdieupon should be credited for it. He's darn good at these videos.

  • Anyone notice the blatant cowardice on drcraigvideos part? I give it 5 minutes before the comments on this video, a video employing personal attacks against an atheist for supposedly being a coward, are turned off.

  • @DevoVevo *YAWN* Yeah, I heard all that stuff before by you a billion tiimes. Good God! How many accounts do you have? Do you even have a life?

  • @drcraigvideos Atheists certainly don't have a life beyond this one. LOL...

  • @DevoVevo you obviously have no sense of humour......no wonder you're an atheist

  • @DevoVevo It's been 10 hours so far. Math disability?

  • So why do you persist? You obviously know you're wrong. Hell you even seem to realize that you can't begin to defend your position in any sort of open discussion without looking like an idiot.

  • @DevoVevo You're the one who comes to my videos with countless users and you're telling me I have the problem of persisting? Plese, try to be fair, okay, DevoVevo-poo.

  • @DevoVevo You should try removing your dick from your arse, and removing your ball-sack from your mouth.

  • Loved the homer simpson voice when he says "Hello"

  • HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!

  • LOL

    

  • lol is that a south park version of Dawkins?

  • @r0baa

    Heck yes!

  • @r0baa This video was way nice compared to what South Park did to Dawkins.

  • Richard Dawkins should read some phsycology and self-improvement books and apply them. Seriously...character is higher than intellect. If you are afraid to lose an argument, take adivse, or admit you're wrong than that means your character is weak. The realization that a belief opposed to your own isn't automatically wrong = the gateway to freedom.

  • lol.

  • This video is a sort of parody of an incident where Richard Dawkins actually made misogynist comments toward an atheist (yes, atheist!) woman who was propositioned by a friend of Dawkins' in an elevator to... well, you know... uh, "talk" alone at 4 AM in his apartment room. Dawkins didn't blame his friend but he did think the girl was stupid!

  • Hah! Nice one. :)

  • lol

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more