how did you get that value of A? it seems unnecessary. when i looked up 0.74 in the "areas in tail of normal distribution" table the value 0.74 yields an area of 0.2296. is this just a coincidence or another way of doing it?
Yh ur right!! actually its not the tables fault.. i looked for phi of 0.2704 in the table.when i looked for 0.704 it said 0.7704..then i have to substract it from 1.
Our charts are different i presume.mine`s always above 0.5
I use the chart that gives you the area from th mean to any point on the X axis. I do this way because the table is only one page, because that's the way you do Chebychev's problems and that's the way students do Empeirical Rule problems. Why confuse students.
I am taking online classes through a university and it can be extremely difficult to learn this stuff by just looking at the examples in a book. The way you explain as you go makes so much sense. I can almost detect the room brightening when that light bulb goes on in my head. THANK YOU!
i know he was using a different Z table. the truth is the z table he used only gives the area to the left of a given point, and that's why his answer was .7704. anyways according to your question his answer is not correct due to the fact that he didn't subtracted from 1.
this is for krivivy what you found is the area to the left of 98.85 and what the question is asking for is the area to the right of 98.85 so therefore 1-.7704=.2296. Lutamann is correct
You have to be familiar with finding the areas under the normal curve. The normal curve is symmetric about the mean - 50% is above and 50% is below. If you wish to find the area in the tail of the curve, you subtract the area up to the tail from .5.
If you have a sample size less than 30, you use the t distribution instead of the z distribution. Actually, you can use the t distribution for any sample size, large or small, but when the n>=30, there is little difference between the two distributions.
THANK YOU! this made me understand what the Central Limit theorem is IMMEDIATELY! I feel like Im getting ripped off in my class since the teacher doesnt explain this stuff. Other than that ill answer the number man over here.
1 It seems random to me as well.
2 It will not, because there will be to little amount of numbers!
nice video, thank you! :)
kzawy 9 months ago
wonderful presentation which allivate my problem on central limit theorem.over all well presented
TheToshme 1 year ago
Very good video but i think is 1- A, not 1-0.5
diegoramos27 1 year ago
how did you get that value of A? it seems unnecessary. when i looked up 0.74 in the "areas in tail of normal distribution" table the value 0.74 yields an area of 0.2296. is this just a coincidence or another way of doing it?
ranagan9 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is scary if u read this far u will die in 10 days if u dont send to any 15 videos in 2 hours good luck hope u dont die
kaybay0724 2 years ago
THANK YOU SO MUCH! You... you genius man you.
Cyanide89 2 years ago
1:47 *applies, not applys
GeneralGibbons 2 years ago
Sorry, General.
Lutemann 2 years ago 6
Its ok, just a friendly grammar correction
GeneralGibbons 2 years ago
First video Great!
In this video, you complicated things to much. You could have approached the problem from a risk point of view (Alpha level of 5%)
Ishayau 2 years ago
Yh ur right!! actually its not the tables fault.. i looked for phi of 0.2704 in the table.when i looked for 0.704 it said 0.7704..then i have to substract it from 1.
Our charts are different i presume.mine`s always above 0.5
yanzipunkstar 2 years ago
I use the chart that gives you the area from th mean to any point on the X axis. I do this way because the table is only one page, because that's the way you do Chebychev's problems and that's the way students do Empeirical Rule problems. Why confuse students.
Lutemann 2 years ago
Actually the probability of getting more than 98 is 0.3936
that is 39.36 % which is far from 23 % tho i know its an approximated figure.
I got this figure from the normal distribution table.
yanzipunkstar 2 years ago
I think you need to check the table. I just did and my figures are correct.
Lutemann 2 years ago
very well explained!
08SJF08 2 years ago
It's great, I also felt the things clicking in my mind. thank you
pignition 2 years ago
Great tutorial, I could feel things starting to click. Thanks.
Talian1 2 years ago
thank you. makes much more sense than simply reading a textbook!
vs10 2 years ago
...i wish you replaced our stupid ass tutor! great video.
buysellgoods 2 years ago
yesssss !!! i solved this problem on your first video and the answer came out to exactly 23%. :]
Sameer3292 2 years ago
I am taking online classes through a university and it can be extremely difficult to learn this stuff by just looking at the examples in a book. The way you explain as you go makes so much sense. I can almost detect the room brightening when that light bulb goes on in my head. THANK YOU!
kit1957 2 years ago
nice thx
Xxshadow200xXXD 2 years ago
Very nice tutorial!
Greetings from Germany...
iamgregor4e 3 years ago
i know he was using a different Z table. the truth is the z table he used only gives the area to the left of a given point, and that's why his answer was .7704. anyways according to your question his answer is not correct due to the fact that he didn't subtracted from 1.
advanup 3 years ago
this is for krivivy what you found is the area to the left of 98.85 and what the question is asking for is the area to the right of 98.85 so therefore 1-.7704=.2296. Lutamann is correct
advanup 3 years ago
Krivivy was using a different Z table. I use the more simple, one page table that gives |Z| from the mean.
Lutemann 3 years ago
.7704, not .2704.
krivivy 3 years ago
The area under the normal curve from 96 to 98 which is .74 standard deviations is .2704. The total area under the curve up to 98 is .7704.
Lutemann 3 years ago
thank you! this was very helpful
lambofpaul 3 years ago
Im confused on how you get the .5 ?
SurfSeeker22 3 years ago
You have to be familiar with finding the areas under the normal curve. The normal curve is symmetric about the mean - 50% is above and 50% is below. If you wish to find the area in the tail of the curve, you subtract the area up to the tail from .5.
Lutemann 3 years ago
If you have a sample size less than 30, you use the t distribution instead of the z distribution. Actually, you can use the t distribution for any sample size, large or small, but when the n>=30, there is little difference between the two distributions.
Lutemann 3 years ago
Hi ,
I would like to ask question.
1. Why is it that you mention the number '30'
Why not say 50 or 100 ?
2.What happen if the sample size is below 30?
say for example 20 , does the CLT still holds .Howe do we solve if the sample size ,n is less than 30?
Thank You
800382914 3 years ago
THANK YOU! this made me understand what the Central Limit theorem is IMMEDIATELY! I feel like Im getting ripped off in my class since the teacher doesnt explain this stuff. Other than that ill answer the number man over here.
1 It seems random to me as well.
2 It will not, because there will be to little amount of numbers!
Jebrone 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
2 ez
i aced stats
try some complex analysis
zasabiibasaz 4 years ago
I'm working my way up. I'm trying to get others to do this, but no one has the time.
Lutemann 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well spend less time on u toob fool
ahhahaah jk at least ur watching something learningful lol
r u a math major they own all ya no
zasabiibasaz 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ma koji je ovo kurac...
nydaa 4 years ago