Added: 1 year ago
From: thepenrev
Views: 7,613
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (87)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You are rambling.......What is your point? The video may bore people. Clean it up. Make it smoother.

  • i think the sec was probably investigating them as a fraud and the scammers done an end round and thru the spotlight on the sec as a means to escape but as with all scum bags, thay got caught anyway.

  • the sting idea was just a diversion by scammers so you would look at the government while the scammers slid under a rock

  • No one is hiding anything per the government FCC or anything.....are you kidding me...there was no case let along a "tough case" have you even bothered to research beyond the conspiracy sites? This is why people will fall for anything because they fail to check anything out.

  • Ok let's get this straight first...this case was a sham (fraud...not real) try to research this before posting it...this is what happens when people do not investigate nor understand what they are reading....no case was ever filed...the "documents" were faked and not real...this is why mainstream is not saying anything because it was proven to be a fraud...look up the case number it does not exist...you don't file a federal law suit in a "civil" court in California.

  • as stated below, no one setteled and thare was no money set aside. A couple of us been researching this and come up with fake documents stating settelment which looked like part of a bigger scam so thare is nothing about this true except maybe a lot of people lost money.

  • The term is "Naked Short Selling". Google it, look it up on YouTube. Look for expert witness Bud Burrell, iTulip and or Deep Capture. Plus, Bloomberg won an Emmy on their abridge 30 min "Naked Short Selling" piece. This is the red pill!!!

  • I'd love for this all to be true but, the more I look and hear about it all, it all seems like just a pipe dream concocked by a bunch of wishdul thinkers.

  • You want definitive proof? Wait for our next court hearing! NAMES will be named.....rocks overturned to expose the bad guys. This will bring the markets down!

  • @sullt47 Still waiting ...

  • listen to recording of hodges cmkx vs SEC commissioners in court on utube here under name: CMKX in Court.wmv

    Date of the court date is August 2, 2010

  • @extacylife alright...thank you..

  • Can anyone offer proof to back up these allegations against the SEC? Surely thepenrev did some independant research, right? So, penrev, show us the facts that support your story!

  • @staff0flag everything you ask for is in the complaint. the lawyer specifically said we have all the evidence we need - and then some - to proceed with the case. someone else already provided a link to listen to what the lawyer said.

    it's a farce? that's why we're getting our money, right? just you wait & see. the stock market is going to crash in the next few days to bury the news story that the sec is going to payout the $3.87T

  • @fuddlovin No, nothing I ask for is in the complaint, which I have actually read. It makes general, sweeping, non-specific claims with naked assertions. That is why I asked for specifics, which you refuse to provide -- BECAUSE YOU CAN NOT. This lawsuit is bound for Rule 56.

  • @staff0flag facts were not stated because that's done in the DISCLOSURE part of a lawsuit. that has not occurred yet. and why hasn't it? the last court date a few weeks ago should have been it. yet, that did not happen? why is that? sounds as though the sec decided to cough up the money, if you ask me, because they DO NOT WANT the evidence to be on the public record. so, if there's no evidence, why did the sec settle the suit?

  • @fuddlovin You're clearly not a lawyer. There is no disclosure part of a lawsuit in America. There is discovery, but that only occurs AFTER the lawsuit pleads sufficient facts (not naked allegations) to meet its burden of moving forward.Here, the court has rejected the initial pleading as inadequate and provided the wingnuts a chance to re-plead. Said re-pleading was submitted on 16 Sept, and provides nothing new other than a rearranging of deskchairs. The nutjobs failed, not the SEC. LOL

  • @fuddlovin BTW: There is no settlement by the SEC. It prevailed on the Motion to Dismiss, the judge gave the Plaintiff a chance to replead, and that repleading was filed on 16 Sept. The fact that you haven't bothered to read the public record and instead hold on to speculation and rumor demonstrates the mindset that allowed $250 million to be scammed from investors.

  • Can only offer verifiable, demonstratively true facts to support this contention that the SEC used CMKX to go after "illegal" trading?

    Anyone?

    Anyone?

  • What, exactly, do the CMKX conspiracy theorist think they have done to deserve a 1000 multiplier on their investment? Investing in a failed company doesn't earn you anything. If the company doesn't make money, niether do you. That's Capitalism 101. Quit whining, suck up the losses, get back in the game and use what you learned to move forward the economy, not try to leach off of it.

  • so you think among those shareholders the 20% who actually received certificates will be paid back anything anytime soon???

  • this is HUGE and im mad that main stream media is not delving into this.

  • @Igentenos i imagine that some of the protected people are involved........

  • @thepenrev Really, I imagine it is because the case is sham, there was no money collected, and even if there were, none of this "money-for-nothing" crybabies were a party to the action that caused that money to be collected, and even if they were, no act of Congress has authorized a payout to which they could lay claim, and even if there were, decades of case law states no individual has a right to demand disbursement. Even if everything these beggars say is true, they still lose.

  • @Igentenos There's no story here. Not one bit of fact for a journalist to trace. CMKX was not legitimate. It's founder ran off with the money. Seriously - what proof does anyone have that the SEC used CMKX to catch naked shortsellers?

  • These morons think they are on the cutting edge of a revolution, when, in fact, they are nothing more than a bunch of pathetic beggars that want to get rich for investing in a stock that sold for .0001 per share. Believe me, they are every bit a stupid as they sound.

  • CMKX: "The Play Of A Lifetime" David Nelson, filed one of the lawsuits on behalf of the shareholders. TheAlyonaShow — April 14, 2010 — Alyona follows up with one of our most viewed and asked about stories, CMKM Diamonds. She chats with CMKM shareholder Dave Nelson about the struggles that the shareholders have faced over the past few years.

    youtube. com/watch?v=_GH5VCvZEYk

  • 15 TRILLION DOLLAR CLASSACTION FOR NAKED SHORTING

    I wonder if we are apart of this or if since we got paid for our certs if we don't have to be apart of this:

    BANK ACTIVITIES REFORM COMMISSION GEARS UP FOR $5 TRILLION US GOVERNMENT SUIT

  • this is getting some media , see this link for the

    tv news broadcast about the CMKX $3.87 trillion lawsuit:

    youtube. com/watch?v=BntQQIPQrLA

  • @OzKnosis wow!!! it is indeed.........:)

  • CMKX was already being shorted heavily when it was chosen as sting vehicle.

    That is why it was chosen.

    And yes, there are many, many more companies that were naked shorted.

    CMKX was biggest by far.

  • @SKarlson1 interesting.......i am learning a lot to say the least......

  • #20 Since then the lawsuit has been filled.

  • By Hodges #19 Each of said representations have been made knowing them to be false, and at the specific direction of the named Defendants. These actions of withholding distribution of said moneys, without compensation and without due process of law, amount to a taking of the property of the individual Plaintiffs and of all similarly situated.

  • By Hodges #18 Demand for release of said moneys has been repeatedly presented to the Securities and Exchange Commission without result. Agents and employees of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice have represented repeatedly that the release of moneys for distribution was imminent, and/or would occur within several weeks, and/or would occur within less than a month.

  • By Hodges #16 Plaintiffs herein are further informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that said moneys, collected for the benefit of shareholders have also been placed in a trust or are otherwise now held in trust by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and the United States Treasury.

  • By Hodges #15 Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that other moneys have been collected for the benefit of the shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, from the United States Government, and from the sale of additional assets including consent to enter into joint venture agreements with other companies holding mineral claims in Saskatchewan, Canada.

  • By Hodges #14 In exchange for a U. S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.

  • By Hodges #12 During the period from November, 2004 through April, 2005, CMKM Diamonds, Inc. negotiated the sale of some of its Saskatchewan, Canada mineral claims to three Chinese domiciled corporations with the advice and consent, inter alia, of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Proceeds from the consummation of such sales were placed into a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.

  • the drug Provenge may soon finally be approved , after the delay.

    here is link to deepcature's story

    .deepcapture. com/michael-milken-60000-death­s-and-the-story-of-dendreon-ch­apter-1-of-15/

  • Also go to deepcapture. com and read about promising prostate drug that was squashed in its final approval stage by the influence of hedge funds that held that company short. The reporter estimates 60,000 prostate deaths had occured since then , that perhaps the drug could have aided.

  • @hermannmaier0 wow....this shit has to end...........

  • Taser had a shareholder meeting in 2005. The company had an outstanding share structure of 60 million, yet 80 million shares were voted at one meeting. And how about the shares in accounts of people who dont vote? An example of the type of market that occurs under the SEC.

  • Pen, as you read more you will begin to see the pattern, of the usual "suspects" in the media, the reporters, example Floyd Norris, that are always available to the SEC, that is more captured to protect the interests of Wall Street players then investors, and these "usual suspects" will always attack anybody that talks about "issues" that Wall street does not want to be out in the public.

  • @extacylife this is just such a mess...........

  • @thepenrev I know, but to bail out the whole wall street banks in USA and banks in other countries because they were their counterparties, by Taxpayers of this country, some that never bought a stock, you know it had to be a mess.

    And now those same banks are fighting in Washington not to be regulated again.

  • @extacylife and we have the foxes guarding the hen house...........

  • @thepenrev Yup. even though there were some really good senators that have made alot of effort to change things. Its a mess as you say. the mess that ended up cleaning citizens of this country out of their savings, their homes , investments etc.

    People are too bussy surviving while the thiefs are just begining another cycle.

  • @extacylife you are so right......but i question whether or not we have ANY good senators...........

  • Pen, these guys really know what they are talking about on deep capture. It involves Wall street players, banks, hedge funds, clearing houses, SEC, DTC, DTCC - which settle 98 % of all stocks in usa. etc. Cmkx shareholders have followed all this for years, including all sec pretending they want to make new rules, but never enforcing them or leaving bunchy o loopholes in it anyway.

  • Attorneys for Plaintiffs ( representing cmkx shareholders): Hodges and associates:

    A. CLIFTON HODGES, State Bar No. 046803

    HODGES AND ASSOCIATES

    4 East Holly Street, Suite 202

    Pasadena, California 91103

    Telephone: (626) 564-9797 Facsimile: (626) 564-9111

  • These are the names of the commissioners- defendants, that are getting sued by cmkm diamonds inc shareholders:

    CHRISTOPHER COX, an individual; MARY L. SCHAPIRO, an individual; CYNTHIA A. GLASSMAN,

    an individual; PAUL S. ATKINS, an individual; ROEL C. CAMPOS, an individual; ANNETTE L. NAZARETH, an individual; TROY A. PAREDES, an individual; LUIS A. AGUILAR, an individual; ELISSE B. WALTER, an..

  • @extacylife They may or may not get sued but first that idiot lawyer Hodges needs to serve the defendants. Why is he delaying?

  • I am one shareholder of CMKX. It has taken years for us to get any media coverage of the power and crimes the SEC,DOJ, certain Journalists, etc have done to the American investors. i applaud your efforts to bring about TRUE government Transparency. Thank you please continue to probe and report.

  • 2.25 trillion shares (not $2.25 trillion dollars)

  • @chiefgecko oh wow!!!! thank you for correcting me.....holy cow!!!!  this is huge.....

  • @thepenrev Yes pen. Deep capture, to keep it basic, is a website, and people that contribute to the website are bunch of "guys" that have been raising red flags and putting out what is going on in our financial stock markets. Basicaly we can call them Market Activists... continue

  • @extacylife part 2: .. Its an effort, going on for years already, to put out and raise exposure to the public, how our financial regulators like SEC have been "captured" metaphoricaly speaking by the Wall Street whom they are suposed to actualy regulate, but dont.

  • The Deep Capture Analysis - by Patrick Byrne Introduction The Setting 1.The Players (hedge funds) 2.The Pawns (journalists) 3.The Regulators The Crime 4.The Crime: Naked Short Selling 5.The Corporate Democracy Hoax 6.Ruined Firms & Looted Pensions 7.Systemic Risk The Cover-up 8.The Deep Capture Campaign 9.The Hijacking of Social Media
  • @extacylife can you plz explain Deep Capture Campaign......this thing is incredible.....

  • @thepenrev pen i want to write more,, but its not alowing me to post. will try later.

  • @thepenrev Pen, look at some utubes on Patrick Bryne, and how the guy talked for years that our markets will crash due to all these illegal things alowed to go on in the market, and loopholes and abuses. The guy took on Wall Street and they did not like it. Off course they want the things to go on as usual.. so they attacked Patrick and called him names.

  • @thepenrev Example of what Floyd Norris, that is financial corespondent for SEC at NYtimes. Take a look at the Whistleblower Garry Aquirre, that worked for SEC, but was fired while on vacation because he wanted to bring in for questioning Mack, who is today a big ceo of a bank. Garry Aquirre went to testify against SEC in front of USA Senate financial comittee.

  • @extacylife So this guy Floyd Norris, a day before Aquirre went to testify against SEC in front of Senate, wrote an article in NYtimes ridiculing Aguirre. Off course to help SEC and try to diminish Aquirre in the eyes of the public. Senators tool the side of Aquirre and even SEC own watchdog OIG David Kotz published official findings that SEC Enforcement division staff should be reprimanded in how they handled Aquirre case.

  • @thepenrev There is a lady called Susan Trimbath that used to work for DTC depository trust, and she is exposing alot of things about how basicaly there is bunch of "phantom" "out of thin air" "nonexistent" "just paper copies" of shares of equities or other financial instruments we buy in stock market sold to us, that are just never cleared- or settled, basicaly dont exist.

  • @extacylife part 3: Patrick Byrne is part of Deep Capture "effort", and he used to work on Wall Street so he has very good understanding of how things work in Wall street and its products. He is also a CEO of Overstock. His company was attacked by illegal naked shorting and he decided to fight back.

  • And you are so rigth penrev, SEC's first and foremost "job" is to keep things under the rug and burry them there along with hurt shareholders instead of protecting shareholders.

    Take a look at Matt Taibi from Rolling stone reporting on "wall street naked short swindle". its here on utube.

  • Senators and SEC's OIG David Kotz both agree that Garry Aquirre was right, and SEC staff should have been reprimanded.

    This was all about a big cat on wall street MACK, todays ceo of big bank, whom Garry Aquirre while working at sec wanted to bring down for deposition and questioning, but SEC fired Aquirre over that while he was on vacation.

  • Off course Floyd Norris was talking badly about Garry Aquirre and supporting SEC however even the SEC's own watchdog OIG did report on SEC conduct and recomended that SEC Staff on that case, the higheups should be reprimanded for misshandling it.

  • good job penrev, thank you for putting this out and taking time and interest.

    This really is the tip of the ice. You mentioned Floyd Norris that reports in nytimes as financial corespondent for SEC, and you have to go back and see how he also attacked the Whistleblower Garry Aguirre when he went to testify against SEC in front of USA Senate Financial Comitee.

  • thanks penrev

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more