It is the Periyar who raised this basic question everyone has to ask themselves. We should thank the Sathyaraj for expressing real periyar in his act . No theist or who said to be anti periyar has answered Thanthai Periyar s question. The word of periyar has destabilise the superstition which is protected by religion and both are protected by communal forces in the name of god...
Sathyaraj is an idiot. Terribly crass in general. This is not about video itself. Please check his video on Hogenakkal. He asks are we tamils "Kena Koo" and uses middle finger and asks if we should suck the middle finger. I am wondering what is the point in saying koo instead of koodhi like leaving it incomplete makes it decent? Is it not funny, all of us come through that very female genital, but when we want deride someone use that very female genitals? Anyway, that is sathyaraj for you.
In trying to address caste oppression which might have been arguably one extreme end of a spectrum, EVR's arguments basically took the other end of the spectrum questioning everything that is held sacrosanct not just by the socalled high castes but also all those who he supposedly represents. So much for rationalism that today Tamilnadu is probably the only state that has atleast a small temple at the end of every street, and bylanes as well.
No one has got the right to speak against Periyaar. Remember he has vast difference with the present personalities such as illegal saints, useless politicians. Remember, most of the flaw saints and politicians says good things and advice, but Periyar's speech may get controversies, but he is the only person who does good things than any others. Apart from seat allocations to OBC candidates, he supported to the welfare of the women's development even now the present politicians couldn't do.
Periyar is a man who got hit on his head by a donkey. that means people shouldn't trust him. He disobeyed his Brahmin parents and says that there no god. He disobeyed his parents!!!
Resorting to superstition is not a useful argument when dealing with rationalists. Try using evidence for or against the actual arguments, next time. Like, for example, what is the evidence for the idea that getting "hit on his head by a donkey" implies that "means people shouldn't trust him" ??? It is just a superstitious idea that has no basis in fact.
The fundamental difference between the religion discussed and Tamil belief systems is the level of superstition and dogma. Tamil approaches to spirituality tend to be more pragmatic, seeing the Divine as being an direct participant in the human experience. So, life is an extension of Divinity. and he itihasas, puranas, and other scriptures become more poetic reflection on it. Contrast this with the blind faith suggested by the two Brahmins in this video.
every 1 has their own views on religion...periyar had his own, but problem is his narrow minded and seperatist views against hinduism and hindi language made tamilnadu apart from rest of india,
great tamil celebs like ,Abdul Kalam,Maniratnam , Arrahman were recognised world wide coz they understood the need of respecting all cultures and accepting all languages and moulded them with out moving away from their tamil roots
There's a big difference between fighting for one's rights and being against the rights of others. Periyar fought for the rights of Tamils. Please take your false self-pity elsewhere. There is no reason why Tamilians should be forced to adopt a language that is not their own. If we choose to speak Hindi, we will do so of our own accord.
The song addresses the problem of infinite regression (first cause). If god created everything, then who created god?
My Tamil is not good enough to properly translate the entire clip, but enough said that Periyar is the reason why Tamil Nadu was the state least plagued with religions violence in India, until recently when communal elements took power and divided communities.
Your, or rather this song's, premise is fundamentally wrong. You assume that the creator ("God") is separate from its creation! At least, according to one darshana, namely Advaita Vedanta, there is nothing BUT God! Meaning, God, as per the Vedas, "is one without a second". People translate this to mean different things but the rishis from ancient India experienced the nature of reality and talked about "God" as being non-different from creation. Hence, AHAM BRAHMASMI.
You are disingenuously distracting from the popular conception of god by presenting a naturalistic entity that has no traditional significance. It is an unfalsifiable hypothesis, like saying I am a brain in a vat and all my experiences are sensory illusions. Why do we use our understanding of the material world till the point where it makes sense and then posit a supernatural 'explanation' when it doesn't? Your assertion not only lacks parsimony, but also is an unnecessary hypothesis.
It is the Periyar who raised this basic question everyone has to ask themselves. We should thank the Sathyaraj for expressing real periyar in his act . No theist or who said to be anti periyar has answered Thanthai Periyar s question. The word of periyar has destabilise the superstition which is protected by religion and both are protected by communal forces in the name of god...
Kathiravan84 8 months ago
Sathyaraj is an idiot. Terribly crass in general. This is not about video itself. Please check his video on Hogenakkal. He asks are we tamils "Kena Koo" and uses middle finger and asks if we should suck the middle finger. I am wondering what is the point in saying koo instead of koodhi like leaving it incomplete makes it decent? Is it not funny, all of us come through that very female genital, but when we want deride someone use that very female genitals? Anyway, that is sathyaraj for you.
laddujahangiri 1 year ago
In trying to address caste oppression which might have been arguably one extreme end of a spectrum, EVR's arguments basically took the other end of the spectrum questioning everything that is held sacrosanct not just by the socalled high castes but also all those who he supposedly represents. So much for rationalism that today Tamilnadu is probably the only state that has atleast a small temple at the end of every street, and bylanes as well.
123Kanthri 1 year ago
:)simple.. he was against brahmins because he didn't get congress president post..He cannot be thought of as a selfless leader
muthuramaganesh 1 year ago
EVR was the greatest idiot
param3333 1 year ago
@param3333 And it takes an idiot to identify another idiot.
sujatanagarajan 1 year ago
@sujatanagarajan Idiots cannot identify anything. That is why they are called idiots
See dictionary. If you follow Evil Evr your brain rots
param3333 1 year ago
Sathyaraj is an idoit
param3333 1 year ago
@param3333
u are an idiot
man go and watch masala films
nbaillusion 1 year ago
No one has got the right to speak against Periyaar. Remember he has vast difference with the present personalities such as illegal saints, useless politicians. Remember, most of the flaw saints and politicians says good things and advice, but Periyar's speech may get controversies, but he is the only person who does good things than any others. Apart from seat allocations to OBC candidates, he supported to the welfare of the women's development even now the present politicians couldn't do.
sriram36 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Periyar is a man who got hit on his head by a donkey. that means people shouldn't trust him. He disobeyed his Brahmin parents and says that there no god. He disobeyed his parents!!!
kohgulanalp 2 years ago
Resorting to superstition is not a useful argument when dealing with rationalists. Try using evidence for or against the actual arguments, next time. Like, for example, what is the evidence for the idea that getting "hit on his head by a donkey" implies that "means people shouldn't trust him" ??? It is just a superstitious idea that has no basis in fact.
evolvender 2 years ago 13
@evolvender
Spritualism is a feeling of communion and this guy is trying to express in words..how can he be? Kazhudaikku teriyuma karpora vasam...
muthuramaganesh 1 year ago
@muthuramaganesh
What are you using to express it? Your ass? You are using words too. Karporam verum sakkaraiadda. Try using your brain instead of wasting it.
evolvender 1 year ago
@evolvender
r u saying only followers of periyar use brains and others waste it is it?
muthuramaganesh 1 year ago
@kohgulanalp periyar's parents weren't brahmins. Thats why he was against them, because he was discriminated against, because he wasn't a brahmin.
nader85021 2 years ago
The fundamental difference between the religion discussed and Tamil belief systems is the level of superstition and dogma. Tamil approaches to spirituality tend to be more pragmatic, seeing the Divine as being an direct participant in the human experience. So, life is an extension of Divinity. and he itihasas, puranas, and other scriptures become more poetic reflection on it. Contrast this with the blind faith suggested by the two Brahmins in this video.
mohan0128 2 years ago
every 1 has their own views on religion...periyar had his own, but problem is his narrow minded and seperatist views against hinduism and hindi language made tamilnadu apart from rest of india,
great tamil celebs like ,Abdul Kalam,Maniratnam , Arrahman were recognised world wide coz they understood the need of respecting all cultures and accepting all languages and moulded them with out moving away from their tamil roots
michaelgaultner 2 years ago
There's a big difference between fighting for one's rights and being against the rights of others. Periyar fought for the rights of Tamils. Please take your false self-pity elsewhere. There is no reason why Tamilians should be forced to adopt a language that is not their own. If we choose to speak Hindi, we will do so of our own accord.
evolvender 2 years ago 4
The song addresses the problem of infinite regression (first cause). If god created everything, then who created god?
My Tamil is not good enough to properly translate the entire clip, but enough said that Periyar is the reason why Tamil Nadu was the state least plagued with religions violence in India, until recently when communal elements took power and divided communities.
evolvender 2 years ago 15
Your, or rather this song's, premise is fundamentally wrong. You assume that the creator ("God") is separate from its creation! At least, according to one darshana, namely Advaita Vedanta, there is nothing BUT God! Meaning, God, as per the Vedas, "is one without a second". People translate this to mean different things but the rishis from ancient India experienced the nature of reality and talked about "God" as being non-different from creation. Hence, AHAM BRAHMASMI.
Ooga001 2 years ago
You are disingenuously distracting from the popular conception of god by presenting a naturalistic entity that has no traditional significance. It is an unfalsifiable hypothesis, like saying I am a brain in a vat and all my experiences are sensory illusions. Why do we use our understanding of the material world till the point where it makes sense and then posit a supernatural 'explanation' when it doesn't? Your assertion not only lacks parsimony, but also is an unnecessary hypothesis.
evolvender 2 years ago 2
Amazing video.. Periyar pughaz onguga...
sooriya4utube 3 years ago 4