blunt promises he demonstrates nothing he doesnt even say what the device tests for !! is this an attempt at seducing business partners ? very disappointed with similar advertisements regularly being validated on ted
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
I don't actually understand why this is so great?!?! A water source that tests fine might be bad in half an hour. Ultimately, what's needed is standard filtration, etc., that TREATS water in such situations--it's much less important, I think, to "know" if water is bad--it's more practical to ASSUME it's bad, and treat it.
Furthermore, regarding disease contamination, one can ALREADY have a small iodine or chlorine "kit," which obviates a need to "test" using a similar sized kit.
@GetMeThere1 filtering all water is not technically feasible in most places. Even technologically advanced nations guard their water supplies from pollution. And even if all water consumed by people were filtered, animals will still be affected and spread the disease.
Look at it this way - do you use a smoke detector or a breathing apparatus at home?
@ennot : The talk was about what to do in emergency situations, ala Haiti. In such situations, actual water treatment is needed. People got cholera there because the contaminated water was ALL THEY HAD--the ability to test it wouldn't have made a difference. The ability to filter/treat it would.
@ennot : The talk was about what to do in emergency situations, ala Haiti. In such situations, actual water treatment is needed. People got cholera there because the contaminated water was ALL THEY HAD--the ability to test it wouldn't have made a difference. The ability to filter/treat it would.
@ennot : The talk was about what to do in emergency situations, such as Haiti. In such situations, actual water treatment is needed. People got cholera there because the contaminated water was ALL THEY HAD--the ability to test it wouldn't have made a difference. The ability to filter/treat it would.
@azmanabdula It's ok, it's a device for scientists, scientists will know what to do if they need a charge... We may find out how they're going with the theories and probable solutions on why the battery won't remained charged in the next TED video!
so by "uses light" does he mean it just shows a red/green light based on if the solution passes a certain absorbance threshold? cus that dere is sum pretty unscientific testing
@AcruxSolus Haha no man. Stand on a stage, in front of hundreds of people, with spotlights glaring into your near sighted eyes... interesting combo. Enough to make you look blasted high
I think it is a simple photometer, so you shine light trough the water and depending on the light you get out on the other side you know if the water is contaminated. however I'm suspicious if it can detect dangerous chemicals and small concentration of bacteria (I did work with those kind of instruments in a biology lab, and it's not as simple as putting the water in)... but if it work's it would be awesome.
This faggot talks like he just single handedly saved the word. Yet we don't even know if that's just a yellow concept box with an LED light ontop. What a pretentious fuck.
It's amazing how people want to sit on a video on youtube and ask all these questions they should be e-mailing to the creators of this device if they are so "concerned" that it's fake. Do you people even know what TED is?
@DaBamBamMan Personally, I know TED is about technology and spreading ideas and such, but never forget it could also be a marketing tool... I mean, someone must be paying for it... Nowadays we must always be aware, and never stop questioning things. We should have learnt from history by now to always question everything, dont you think?
People, please use your heads, he was given three minutes to speak, which most likely is not enough time to explain in depth on how this works. It was to get the word out and let others know that this project exists.
It works by employing magic water genies. Alternatively, you could simply submerge a real canary in the water. If it stops struggling after a few minutes, the water is contaminated. Who wants to drink water with a dead bird in it?
these guys are creating a device that will save millions of lives and not profiteering off it. inspiring. this should be what ted is about, not hippies with guitars
I invented a device, and when you pointit at a TEDtalks screenshot, it tells you within seconds,if it is stupid or not. No watching a whole episode, no dangerous boredom or awkward fails, there is a red and green light and the red one.........
Nothing much about its functionality is mentioned on their website either. The only bit of info mentioned is that "it uses patented spectral technology to reduce the time of testing". Strange
@Studi037 Skepticism is understandable, but comparing this to cold fusion I think is a bit of a stretch. The device, or one similar to it can't be that difficult to mass produce and rely on for yielding accurate data on water.
Vibrio Cholera can be seen with dark-field microscope, which is not very time consuming and as many people also state, there is a very simple solution to the problem: BOILING THE WATER!
Devices like this are likely to bee too low in sensitivity and/or specificity to be trusted with a potentially dangerous infection such as Cholera. Again, boiling and use of disinfectants are key in situations such as in Haiti.
This is brilliant, if they combine this technology with life saver water purifiers which are not overly expensive, we can save so many lives. TED= A BETTER TOMORROW
This is what can be found on their website: The Technology
The Water Canary’s exclusive use of patented spectral technology reduces to seconds the testing time for disease-causing pathogens, lowering the cost per test to a fraction of current solutions.
It's in its early stages so right now, it's like an idea that's sure to happen, and a good one. Basically, he just said you can test water with almost no money and no knowledge. All you have to do is distinguish two different colors and know how to put water inside it. I think it's a great idea. I know he didn't go into the specifics but maybe that's because he doesn't know them yet. He knows we going to make a life saver and how it works. That's good enough
"it uses light"... uh... ok? It sounds like it's just a tiny, cheap spectrophotometer. If so, it would be pretty useless. You can't tell with much accuracy whether something is safe to drink or not purely by the color or attenuation properties of water.
I dont know. I think early and massive preventive use of water purification agents like chlorine would be more helpful than this because this spectrometer(I think its one) tells you only if it is already too late and they are also not very specific too so other stuff could easily cause a posivite reading.
@cowpacino They only gave him 3 minutes, which seems unfair given that it seems like a pretty awesome device. I'm sure if he'd had longer he would of expended on what he said.
BUT HOW DOES IT WORK!? I mean if it's open source, we should know if we want to help shouldn't we? What are the different contaminants it tests for? I guess because it's in early stages they don't have the answer to these and other important questions?
@Ghost00117 If the answer is that important to you then do what others do. Go to TED.com, look up this talk, and use the contact the speaker utility. You could also look up their website. Those that want to make a difference will do the work required. Do not think that everything will be handed to you.
@alpha4005 I'm not asking for things to be handed to me. It just seemed improper to introduce such a device, call it open source, and NOT describe how it works. He really should have been given enough time to talk about how it works, IMO. I'll try finding out more using your suggestion. Thanks for the comment.
It's soo exhausting. How much time and resources will continue to be wasted on a people who are simply too inept to help themselves with even the most provisions and assistance.
@JakXenon The sample loader looks like something used in UV-Vis spectroscopy. With CMOS cameras being manufactured in bulk for cell phones and webcams, and diffraction gratings being easy to make, I should be pretty cheap to get a good spectrograph. It would be a bitch to analyze the readings though, but that's the approach I would take.
ATTENTION IDIOT* silver colloidal Ions from normal silver metal DESTROY virulent pathogens...
So before you rant about a complex system of intellectual bullshit with million dollar funds from Other Peoples Money. Consider this: (KISS)
Go play a liberal Politician or Eco- Freak with OPM......SOMEWHERE ELSE!
MichaelSmathers 4 weeks ago
blunt promises he demonstrates nothing he doesnt even say what the device tests for !! is this an attempt at seducing business partners ? very disappointed with similar advertisements regularly being validated on ted
mrdotbryce 1 month ago 2
@mrdotbryce Dear fucking moron, as he did say, the device tests for pathogens such as cholera. Signed, -Normal person
JohnShandy 1 month ago
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 1 month ago
Someone please explain the dislikes to me.
USMerchantMarines 1 month ago
open-source hardware, wow.. incredible
Gazonkie 1 month ago
spread the water!!!
haigfeinn 1 month ago
i would have liked to hear this a year from now when they would actually explain the product
dans1121 1 month ago
lovely!
machinevos 1 month ago
sounds like magic. green light/red light.
superdiza 1 month ago
yes, but what's the idea?
ennot 1 month ago 2
@ennot They are probably just measuring how much light is scattered or absorbed in the sample... like ordinary turbidity measurements..
daras07 1 month ago
water is life
TheZietgiest 1 month ago
hope we can get to it soon D:
ElmoNotty 1 month ago
I don't actually understand why this is so great?!?! A water source that tests fine might be bad in half an hour. Ultimately, what's needed is standard filtration, etc., that TREATS water in such situations--it's much less important, I think, to "know" if water is bad--it's more practical to ASSUME it's bad, and treat it.
Furthermore, regarding disease contamination, one can ALREADY have a small iodine or chlorine "kit," which obviates a need to "test" using a similar sized kit.
GetMeThere1 1 month ago
@GetMeThere1 filtering all water is not technically feasible in most places. Even technologically advanced nations guard their water supplies from pollution. And even if all water consumed by people were filtered, animals will still be affected and spread the disease.
Look at it this way - do you use a smoke detector or a breathing apparatus at home?
ennot 1 month ago
@ennot : The talk was about what to do in emergency situations, ala Haiti. In such situations, actual water treatment is needed. People got cholera there because the contaminated water was ALL THEY HAD--the ability to test it wouldn't have made a difference. The ability to filter/treat it would.
GetMeThere1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ennot : The talk was about what to do in emergency situations, ala Haiti. In such situations, actual water treatment is needed. People got cholera there because the contaminated water was ALL THEY HAD--the ability to test it wouldn't have made a difference. The ability to filter/treat it would.
GetMeThere1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ennot : The talk was about what to do in emergency situations, such as Haiti. In such situations, actual water treatment is needed. People got cholera there because the contaminated water was ALL THEY HAD--the ability to test it wouldn't have made a difference. The ability to filter/treat it would.
GetMeThere1 1 month ago
What a great way to start the morning. Awesome idea.
Bfavrestarr415 1 month ago
Awesome! Short and sweet!
Also, did you guys see the EARS on this man?? I'm glad I grew into my ears from when I was younger. lol.
asdfgoogle 1 month ago
well done, thank you, sharing
Shell4445 1 month ago
I want one.
tinosnit 1 month ago
Fluorescence? Scattering? Turbidity? Spectroscopy?
felixthehuman 1 month ago
Damn nice .
slLLyhumans 1 month ago
OK,its amazing...........BUT HOW DOES IT WORK???
ahsan2mahmood 1 month ago
How can you dislike a video previewing an invention that could save thousands upon thousands of lives?
monkeyrecordsnz 1 month ago
Great talk. Simple and to the point. Sounds like a much needed device.
MrHashmoney01 1 month ago 3
ok...found a pond...YEHAAA
got my water canary...
power socket?
farrrrk
azmanabdula 1 month ago
@azmanabdula ...it uses battery...
WiiAreSIN 1 month ago
@WiiAreSIN batteries go flat : P
thats all im saying...
azmanabdula 1 month ago
@azmanabdula It's ok, it's a device for scientists, scientists will know what to do if they need a charge... We may find out how they're going with the theories and probable solutions on why the battery won't remained charged in the next TED video!
MRL1985 1 month ago
@MRL1985 but isnt this meant for commercial use? in places with no electricity and no water treatment plants?
seriously, what if it is flat?
or does it only use energy when a tablet is in there?
azmanabdula 1 month ago
@MRL1985 question mark abuse! sorry
azmanabdula 1 month ago
cool video!
JustinRoth93 1 month ago
exactly.. where n how much is this water testing thing?
peacheramerika 1 month ago
where can i buy one?
Robinsonero 1 month ago
no patent yet hence the lack of explanation...
ymarmash 1 month ago 27
@ymarmash how does patenting a product actually relate to opensourcing it?
lebasson 1 month ago 2
so by "uses light" does he mean it just shows a red/green light based on if the solution passes a certain absorbance threshold? cus that dere is sum pretty unscientific testing
defaultuser88 1 month ago
It's obviously powered by magic
Telleryn 1 month ago
Why does he keep squinting his eyes? Does he need to shit?
AcruxSolus 1 month ago
@AcruxSolus The guy looks high as crap
DaNZOmen 1 month ago
@AcruxSolus Haha no man. Stand on a stage, in front of hundreds of people, with spotlights glaring into your near sighted eyes... interesting combo. Enough to make you look blasted high
maddcatone 1 month ago
for the water canary, did you use technology or was it a nontechnology?
ironlionkalo 1 month ago
I think it is a simple photometer, so you shine light trough the water and depending on the light you get out on the other side you know if the water is contaminated. however I'm suspicious if it can detect dangerous chemicals and small concentration of bacteria (I did work with those kind of instruments in a biology lab, and it's not as simple as putting the water in)... but if it work's it would be awesome.
unluckylion 1 month ago
@unluckylion It is a spectrometer, at least according to their website.
littlestworkshop 1 month ago
This faggot talks like he just single handedly saved the word. Yet we don't even know if that's just a yellow concept box with an LED light ontop. What a pretentious fuck.
ThePeoplesGuru 1 month ago
It seems like something they aim to do instead of something they had done.
jdroker 1 month ago
It uses light so you don't have to wait for a chemical reaction ?
I really don't see how.
Not digging this ted talk. Sounds all fancy but I don't see this happening
hippodude100 1 month ago
The official site is also incredibly vague. This looks like one of those void investment baits.
1ucasvb 1 month ago
Amazing!
NobodysOffTheHook 1 month ago
It's amazing how people want to sit on a video on youtube and ask all these questions they should be e-mailing to the creators of this device if they are so "concerned" that it's fake. Do you people even know what TED is?
DaBamBamMan 1 month ago
@DaBamBamMan Personally, I know TED is about technology and spreading ideas and such, but never forget it could also be a marketing tool... I mean, someone must be paying for it... Nowadays we must always be aware, and never stop questioning things. We should have learnt from history by now to always question everything, dont you think?
hastalueguito 1 month ago
People, please use your heads, he was given three minutes to speak, which most likely is not enough time to explain in depth on how this works. It was to get the word out and let others know that this project exists.
alpha4005 1 month ago 3
0:15
Tnat1on 1 month ago
It works by employing magic water genies. Alternatively, you could simply submerge a real canary in the water. If it stops struggling after a few minutes, the water is contaminated. Who wants to drink water with a dead bird in it?
RDJim 1 month ago 5
@RDJim Ehehehe! :D
I was gonna thumbs-down ya, but thumbsed-up ya because of that little twist at the end.
Rarae192 1 month ago
these guys are creating a device that will save millions of lives and not profiteering off it. inspiring. this should be what ted is about, not hippies with guitars
HonkeyTonTon 1 month ago
watercanary(dot)com
Shalek 1 month ago
I bet none of the designers are red-green colorblind...
nittle90 1 month ago 50
@nittle90 Doh!
MRL1985 1 month ago
Artige.no!
TheExtractor1 1 month ago
I invented a device, and when you pointit at a TEDtalks screenshot, it tells you within seconds,if it is stupid or not. No watching a whole episode, no dangerous boredom or awkward fails, there is a red and green light and the red one.........
andrewc2768 1 month ago
If it uses light for analysis then he is talking about spectrophotometry.
Copperfoilhat 1 month ago
he should just invent a tricorder from Star Trek.
andrewc2768 1 month ago
@andrewc2768
I believe one has been invented and the creator(s) won a financial prize for it. Atleast thats what I heard.
TheIslammiracle 1 month ago
Nothing much about its functionality is mentioned on their website either. The only bit of info mentioned is that "it uses patented spectral technology to reduce the time of testing". Strange
87sumedha 1 month ago
This looks like hes trying to sell something instead of helping people, tell us how it works, jesus christ this talk was really dumb
frozencold199 1 month ago 2
Good elevator pitch if he's looking for venture capital...
Hope this isn't the new cold-fusion.
Studi037 1 month ago
@Studi037 Skepticism is understandable, but comparing this to cold fusion I think is a bit of a stretch. The device, or one similar to it can't be that difficult to mass produce and rely on for yielding accurate data on water.
captainhampton 1 month ago
It is. However, both claim to work hocus pocus with water and save humankind in the process...
I will be very, very excited if this is an actual piece of technology.
@captainhampton
Studi037 1 month ago
Wonderful news!
sparrow111260 1 month ago
Surely my eyes do the same job but for free.
doford 1 month ago
this is too short
Josephhanul 1 month ago
Vibrio Cholera can be seen with dark-field microscope, which is not very time consuming and as many people also state, there is a very simple solution to the problem: BOILING THE WATER!
Devices like this are likely to bee too low in sensitivity and/or specificity to be trusted with a potentially dangerous infection such as Cholera. Again, boiling and use of disinfectants are key in situations such as in Haiti.
strek0655 1 month ago
This is brilliant, if they combine this technology with life saver water purifiers which are not overly expensive, we can save so many lives. TED= A BETTER TOMORROW
metahelix 1 month ago
This is what can be found on their website: The Technology
The Water Canary’s exclusive use of patented spectral technology reduces to seconds the testing time for disease-causing pathogens, lowering the cost per test to a fraction of current solutions.
watercanary[dot]com
hazeee123 1 month ago
Looks like an ad to build hype for their product.
VortexContinuum 1 month ago
Sounds like it's shining light through the water to see the bacteria and shit.
divineagent 1 month ago
News flash: Boil your fucking water when you're in the field.
bamboo4tameshigiri 1 month ago 3
@bamboo4tameshigiri I'm not sure if you're living in such rough conditions boiling water is always a viable solution.
soulsanctuarymusic1 1 month ago
It's in its early stages so right now, it's like an idea that's sure to happen, and a good one. Basically, he just said you can test water with almost no money and no knowledge. All you have to do is distinguish two different colors and know how to put water inside it. I think it's a great idea. I know he didn't go into the specifics but maybe that's because he doesn't know them yet. He knows we going to make a life saver and how it works. That's good enough
DarkAura971 1 month ago
0:16
h9kh9k 1 month ago
TED = AWESOME
husnainanwaar1992 1 month ago
inspired by twitter
HensPie 1 month ago
Can i reach transcript of these videos???
emadtvshow 1 month ago
@emadtvshow go to the TED website. The transcripts are there.
PBDPBD 1 month ago
"it uses light"... uh... ok? It sounds like it's just a tiny, cheap spectrophotometer. If so, it would be pretty useless. You can't tell with much accuracy whether something is safe to drink or not purely by the color or attenuation properties of water.
PBDPBD 1 month ago
Excellent! This fellow sounded like a student of the late great Louis Buscaglia
dkwline 1 month ago
@dkwline You mean Leo Buscaglia?
gamegloss 1 month ago
I dont know. I think early and massive preventive use of water purification agents like chlorine would be more helpful than this because this spectrometer(I think its one) tells you only if it is already too late and they are also not very specific too so other stuff could easily cause a posivite reading.
Morkvonork 1 month ago
he didn't explain the device at all
cowpacino 1 month ago 68
@cowpacino Cause that's not the main point but he did say it uses light to test the water.
dude12nothin 1 month ago
@cowpacino He had 3 minutes.
apocaRUFF 1 month ago
@cowpacino They only gave him 3 minutes, which seems unfair given that it seems like a pretty awesome device. I'm sure if he'd had longer he would of expended on what he said.
soulsanctuarymusic1 1 month ago
@cowpacino They're all timed. He just didn't have enough time. *shrug*
Aresftfun 1 month ago
If it kills you, it's not safe to drink, cowpacino
SiliconBong 1 month ago
@cowpacino it's nothing more than a simplified, pocktable spectrometer, I don't think it can detect pathogens, only specific contaminants
quaxk 1 month ago 3
@cowpacino he had less than 5minutes...
manpaisa92 1 month ago
BUT HOW DOES IT WORK!? I mean if it's open source, we should know if we want to help shouldn't we? What are the different contaminants it tests for? I guess because it's in early stages they don't have the answer to these and other important questions?
Ghost00117 1 month ago 60
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ghost00117 Cause that's not the main point but he did say it uses light to test the water.
dude12nothin 1 month ago
@Ghost00117 I guess just cholera. Wonder what the ppm has to be.
TED should include follow/blog links for the speakers.
sacrux 1 month ago
@Ghost00117 It could just be that they didn't give him a long enough time slot?
aluphoss 1 month ago 2
@Ghost00117 If the answer is that important to you then do what others do. Go to TED.com, look up this talk, and use the contact the speaker utility. You could also look up their website. Those that want to make a difference will do the work required. Do not think that everything will be handed to you.
alpha4005 1 month ago
@alpha4005 I'm not asking for things to be handed to me. It just seemed improper to introduce such a device, call it open source, and NOT describe how it works. He really should have been given enough time to talk about how it works, IMO. I'll try finding out more using your suggestion. Thanks for the comment.
Ghost00117 1 month ago
@Ghost00117
He only had 3:38!
Mrmoc7 1 month ago
@Mrmoc7
Scratch that, he only had 3:23!
Mrmoc7 1 month ago
HELL YEAH!!! So much better than the last vid!!!
maxjosephwheeler 1 month ago
I'm not one to doubt the science behind new technology but an explanation on mechanism was almost entirely absent and that annoyed me.
RIP coal mine canaries.
TheGerogero 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheGerogero Cause that's not the main point but he did say it uses light to test the water.
dude12nothin 1 month ago
That fact that this project is intended to be open-source... = WIN!!
CognitiveApprentice 1 month ago
I feel bad for the coal mine canaries ;(
gearhead135 1 month ago
more time, and more info please, whats the science behind the device, i do not want to follow it blindly.
myndwork 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@myndwork Cause that's not the main point but he did say it uses light to test the water.
dude12nothin 1 month ago
It's soo exhausting. How much time and resources will continue to be wasted on a people who are simply too inept to help themselves with even the most provisions and assistance.
14ByTheSword 1 month ago
I like his glasses
rakketakke 1 month ago
GENIUS
twistedbass15 1 month ago
im not even sure what the device does, so it uses light but to do what? this guy needed more time.
JakXenon 1 month ago
@JakXenon The sample loader looks like something used in UV-Vis spectroscopy. With CMOS cameras being manufactured in bulk for cell phones and webcams, and diffraction gratings being easy to make, I should be pretty cheap to get a good spectrograph. It would be a bitch to analyze the readings though, but that's the approach I would take.
Kotesu 1 month ago
I want a Canary.
skillbill83 1 month ago