@464928952 The technology of the AH64D is not better or smarter than the Mi-28. Mi28 is better armored against 40mm explosive shells, 80mm RPG shells protects the Engines. The proofed glass holds 20mm over 10 shots.It has ejection seats it makes it much safer. It has the lost IR signature about 80-23 degrees, no other helicopter has such less heat exhaust.AH64D has about 180-80 degrees its pretty much.Mi28 can carry 2 crashed pilots in backside for special armored chassis.Weapons more powerfull.
@Talshet Mi28 use standart thermobaric missiles wich can destroy mordern tanks without direct hit about 12 meters next to it. The most of this unguided missiles wich are thermobaric can destroy bunkers. It has the biggest ATGMs like the Karen AA10, the warhead is the biggest, it can destroy big buildings it could destroy The WTC. 90kg Warhead of THEAT,HESH,HEAT,MHEAT or Thermobaric. The 30mm canon fittet with DU like Apache, the range of the bordcanon is max 8km both.AA missiles fires 6-15km.
Although it may not be able to match the performance of dedicated attack helicopters such as the Apache or Havoc, the Hind is still an awesome all in one kind of machine.
@Jushniykray Good, then come up with some arguments or shut up, we dont want to listen to shitty people talking about stuff they dont know anything about.
@464928952 ; Yes, different choppers that were deployed in exactly the same role: the Huey proving very inadequate. Battlefield facts: countless times Hueys had to land to deliver or pick troops in the midst of the battle, showing extreme vulnerability -thousands were shot down. Not the wisest solution to the violent nature of the environment where it was deployed. The Soviet solution with the Hind was monumental: BRUTAL punch and power of destruction, armored, and also WAY faster than the Huey.
@Suyamu: And compare Hind losses in Afghan with the horrific helicopter losses the U.S. suffered in Vietnam. The UH-1 was a fine, noble machine but proved extremely vulnerable even to small fire arms, with those 2 huge side doors open, exposed pilots, and virtually zero armor. One AK-47 could more than enough to shoot it down. Aware of such tremendous vulnerability they made hastily field adaptions fitting it with defensive guns and rockets. The Hind did not bother with such concerns.
hahahha!!! mi 24 never was shot down in combat that not possopble!!! mi 24 were downed when mi 24 transoprt something and its not care weapon!!!!!! its impossopble to shot down mi 24 is combat not possble !!!! mi 24 is better from apache and all west helicopters !! ka 50 is best
@464928952 The technology of the AH64D is not better or smarter than the Mi-28. Mi28 is better armored against 40mm explosive shells, 80mm RPG shells protects the Engines. The proofed glass holds 20mm over 10 shots.It has ejection seats it makes it much safer. It has the lost IR signature about 80-23 degrees, no other helicopter has such less heat exhaust.AH64D has about 180-80 degrees its pretty much.Mi28 can carry 2 crashed pilots in backside for special armored chassis.Weapons more powerfull.
Talshet 5 months ago
@Talshet Mi28 use standart thermobaric missiles wich can destroy mordern tanks without direct hit about 12 meters next to it. The most of this unguided missiles wich are thermobaric can destroy bunkers. It has the biggest ATGMs like the Karen AA10, the warhead is the biggest, it can destroy big buildings it could destroy The WTC. 90kg Warhead of THEAT,HESH,HEAT,MHEAT or Thermobaric. The 30mm canon fittet with DU like Apache, the range of the bordcanon is max 8km both.AA missiles fires 6-15km.
Talshet 5 months ago
Although it may not be able to match the performance of dedicated attack helicopters such as the Apache or Havoc, the Hind is still an awesome all in one kind of machine.
Darkangel754 7 months ago
@464928952 Check out the Kamov 50 and 52
brendonnz1964 10 months ago
@464928952 Helicopter to Helicopter, Kamov 52 has best flying characteristics.
brendonnz1964 10 months ago
More like the fat fuck of attack helicopters. This thing is huge.
Omnikron228 1 year ago
@464928952 crapache... LOL xD sucks against MI-28. Ka-50 and KA-52 alligator... ;)
Jushniykray 1 year ago
@Jushniykray Good, then come up with some arguments or shut up, we dont want to listen to shitty people talking about stuff they dont know anything about.
JVC7400 1 year ago
@464928952
Think what you want.
Ignorance is bliss...
Suyamu 1 year ago
@464928952 ; Yes, different choppers that were deployed in exactly the same role: the Huey proving very inadequate. Battlefield facts: countless times Hueys had to land to deliver or pick troops in the midst of the battle, showing extreme vulnerability -thousands were shot down. Not the wisest solution to the violent nature of the environment where it was deployed. The Soviet solution with the Hind was monumental: BRUTAL punch and power of destruction, armored, and also WAY faster than the Huey.
vonkaunaz 1 year ago
The best helicopter in the world
dariali20009 1 year ago
@464928952
"those sorry ass rag heads" shot down 16 Hinds in the course of 10 years of war...
Soviets lost about 2 hinds a year.
I'd say that's a pretty damn good number - especially when considering the enemy had access to US anti air missiles.
Suyamu 1 year ago
@Suyamu: And compare Hind losses in Afghan with the horrific helicopter losses the U.S. suffered in Vietnam. The UH-1 was a fine, noble machine but proved extremely vulnerable even to small fire arms, with those 2 huge side doors open, exposed pilots, and virtually zero armor. One AK-47 could more than enough to shoot it down. Aware of such tremendous vulnerability they made hastily field adaptions fitting it with defensive guns and rockets. The Hind did not bother with such concerns.
vonkaunaz 1 year ago
@464928952 If a battle force relies on choppers to the AA role, it's already dead.
Sagramorbald 1 year ago
its the most good looking hellicopter
smilgars 1 year ago
@464928952 UMMMM NO!!!
Mr0982mmawarrior 1 year ago
nice video men very cool!!!!
nbpagent 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Russian Helicopters are good, but sadly they forgot that there was something called SAM !!!
Its only good against weak and civilians the reason they was used in Afganistan was mostly killing civilians
hornborgdk 2 years ago
killing mostly civilians ? heh, did you get that idea from tom hanks' movie ? ))))
HayTxa 2 years ago 10
Nice heli but old :(
My father is a Mil Mi-24 pilot :)
trufa12 2 years ago 3
Salute ur dad on my behalf !!
ARKIEX 2 years ago
nice helicopter it is............
rohitkumarindia 3 years ago
But they was shot down with Stinger in Afganistan and that was the end off storie
hornborgdk 3 years ago
hahahha!!! mi 24 never was shot down in combat that not possopble!!! mi 24 were downed when mi 24 transoprt something and its not care weapon!!!!!! its impossopble to shot down mi 24 is combat not possble !!!! mi 24 is better from apache and all west helicopters !! ka 50 is best
tonijocevski 2 years ago 3
Well the Mi-24 was shoot down many times in Afganistan when US CIA supplied the Mujahedin with Stingers.
The MI-24 ALWAYS had weapons on it in Afganistan it was war..
The last knock out off one was the 2 Febuary 1989. also by a stinger.
tsk tsk tsk
hornborgdk 2 years ago
Mi-24 has a strong armor beneath...its known as a flying Tank!
ARKIEX 2 years ago 15
dus minute ka original video kat chat kay 1:31 kay kea hai lol
SUPERPOWERINDI 3 years ago
end ka footage aapne IAF ka hai na?
ARKIEX 2 years ago
I think so
SUPERPOWERINDI 2 years ago
@ARKIEX kya footage?
HIDAMACCA 2 years ago
yea 1:14 se lekar end tak jo night flying ka clip hai ... woh mai ke raha tha Indian Airforce ka hai.
ARKIEX 2 years ago