Deconstructing the Pentagon Attack - 1 of 9

[Pipmen]

Great Job! The section which describes the flight path is very good. But please try to find more independent evidence/ eyewitnesses for the fly-away-section of this video.

[E1itetube]

I had friends that found raw footage of what hit the pentagon on the internet right after 9/11. They said it looked like a missile. They looked it up in the library because of fear they would disappear. I have not been able to find fake or possibly real footage since. They must have wiped them clean.

[dreadnaught2]

Airline Pilots association offered a 2 million dollar reward for OBL. What does this tell you about how a group of professionals feel about the truther myths of the pentagon flight path?

[monkeygonetoheavensi]

@dreadnaught2 Why can't they show us the movie of the plane hitting it then?? Come on dickhead tell me that. By the way yr channel here on YT is dull as dogshit. Americans huh..shit for fucking brains...

[TheUshijinx]

are the demon faces seen in many videos fake? it is really fucking creepy. the demon appears at 1:30 in the smoke.

[rpsmith014]

@TheUshijinx You're brain just takes bits and pieces of visual input and forms it into something it can recognize in order to "make sense" of what you're seeing. You're really seeing "demon faces" but it's your brain playing tricks on you.

[sirgator2099]

entirely, like this buffoon, when he concedes that plane debris was recovered at the Pentagon... But somehow side steps that conclusion like a MOHHRON... A high jacked plane his this building end of story. People died, the flight crashed, all these brilliant theories are garbage, get a fin brain and stop trying to be different from realistic people just for the sake of it.

[sirgator2099]

Wonderful reasoning in this article, NOT. Yea you could recover plenty of debris from other plane crashes where a pilot clearly wants to DIVERT the crash, but it would make sense to even slow joe that a person with the intent to cause as much damage to a structure would be trying to collide with the highest speed possible. This would have a much higher force of impact DUH, not mention crashing into probably one of the most fortified buildings in the US. I guess you could just disregard

[797trae797]

i hate the fucking gov they planed it you know the FBI was all out befor the plane even crashed it was the gov they did it all planned ny gov

[drone8888]

When I choose to do something..THAT ALONE increases the odds. To cripple a nation,you would not want to tell anyone you were about to attack except for a select few who were to benefit. And that they did. You contradict yourself.

[drone8888]

So they perpetrated building 7 which would have taken some amount of time to setup the explosives for that 1. So in your mind they can do 1 act of terror but not a few on the same day because of the odds?? /sigh

[roquefortfiles]

@drone8888 No. B7 was taken out by falling debris from the towers. Like dude honestly All you "Truthers" are showing up to a tuxedo party dressed in a bunny costume. That is how out of it you all are!!. I have a full interview with the FDNY chief. The coles notes version?. They knew all about B7. They knew at 2pm it would collapse. It was inspected by numerous SE teams and fire companies. The chief stood in front when it fell.

Its a yawn. And no smoking gun AT ALL!!

[MrNoblemanoflove]

We are called to be aware so that if some in power decide to fight for liberty, educated men might prevent public lynching for those who dare. How? and What? are upstaged by the Who? and Why. Ppl become accomplices to those evils they fail to oppose. If the truth sets us free a lie enslaves us. If u don't read the paper u will b uninformed. If u do u will b misinformed. Those who refuse 2 use brains are no better off than those with none...keep using 'em

[roquefortfiles]

CMSgt. John Monaccio wrote: "I was in room 1B461. The plane's inertia carried aircraft remains all the way through the building coming to rest on the outside walls of our offices. We discovered cockpit wreckage at our feet while attempting to rescue people from a Navy operations area."

Verifiable evidence? Oh really!!? Hmmm When the cockpit is resting at people's feet?

More fucking nonsense from the ""TRUTH" movement people.

[youblong]

@roquefortfiles Because someone writes it, doesn't make it truth. Seeing is believing, show me a pic. of that cockpit at his office wall.(wreckage of)

I see witnesses here, that validates this guy's attempt for truth. And they even give an audio interpertation of their accounts that day. Maybe if they had wrote it in an article you could believe something fishy happened that dreadful day. IDK just my opinion..not throwing out conspiracy theories. nor do i want to argue them, just show me proof

[NellJSmith]

@roquefortfiles Again, who says that there was NO plane? Just that the damage immediately post-impact isn't consistent with any other plane crash ALONE. Especially against such an immensely strong structure as the Pentagon. And isn't it handy that the plane hit the ONLY newly-completed reinforced section of the building which was not only EXTRA-reinforced, but also significantly under-occupied in terms of how many staff would NORMALLY have been there...? All standard coincidence, of course :)

[roquefortfiles]

This is UTTER AND COMPLETE NONSENSE!!! Who watches this crap? Who posts this crap?? American Airlines CLEARLY written on debris strewn all over the front lawn. Landing gear struts from the jet. The shattered remnants of the cockpit with a seat still bolted to the floor reported by firemen. Landing gear hub consistent with the jet.

And these can't put a BOEING 767 at this location?

Who produced this video STEVIE WONDER?

Complete crap!!

[youblong]

@roquefortfiles All the photos i have been able to find of wreckage only show pieces small enough to be moved by hand. Never have i been able to see a photo showing a Titanium Engine. And the one photo i seen with what they said to be a piece of the engine is too small to have come from a comercial aircraft. ( yet the correct size to fit an A3Sky Warrior, or something similar). Please if you have a link showing a commercial sized aircraft engine anywhere near the pentagon that day, i need to see

[roquefortfiles]

@youblong Really? Too bad. If you know what you are looking at it is easy to see. I can make out. The landing gear, landing gear struts, hubs, portions of the cockpit (With Boeing Green primer on them.. probably the most telling aspect that a COMMERCIAL airliner is there. (Boeing Green is ONLY used on commercial aircraft) Exterior skin with AMERICAN AIRLINES on it.. (Helllo!!) A fireman reported a cockpit chair still strapped to some flooring..

Like how much do you need??

[youblong]

@roquefortfiles AGAIN! I asked for a link not your opinion! All you are stating is other's reports, i don't care what you have read, heard, or seen. LINK, SHOW ME.... yes, i have seen all you speak of, i could then turn around and say it was staged and placed there. But i won't, i am asking for a link to show me cockpit wreckage. If you can't provide that then i understand my search must continue. I seek truth only. You enjoy your fight to be right.

[roquefortfiles]

@youblong Staged and placed there? I guess the C 130 pilot who was flying in the area at the time and asked by ATC to look out for the plane, Which he did and then watched as it hit the Pentagon. Aint enough for you. I don't really care if you don't believe me. I am not your librarian. I have seen the material LOTS of it. Go dig it up yourself aint my job to spoon feed you nor do i care if you believe or not.

The cockpit wreckage is FRONT CENTER!! but FEW what they are looking at.

[Born2Flesh]

you are full of shit! The official pentagon story is total bullshit.....there were at least 6 cameras on the attack side of the pentagon on 9/11. ...not only were there 6 cameras on the outside of the pentagon, there are cameras on the inside of the pentagon. Where the fuck are the tapes? ....there's even videos showing evidence being planted at the pentagon. 9/11 = Inside Job!

[Born2Flesh]

liar

[roquefortfiles]

@Born2Flesh How's that?!! Because it pisses all over your silly ass ridiculous conspiracy theories?? You actually have to think for a change??  Dude.. if the NTSB has the data recorders... The plane is there!!

Get over it fella!!!

[Born2Flesh]

you are full of shit!  The official pentagon story is total bullshit.....there were at least 6 cameras on the attack side of the pentagon on 9/11. ...not only were there 6 cameras on the outside of the pentagon, there are cameras on the inside of the pentagon. Where the fuck are the tapes? ....there's even videos showing evidence being planted at the pentagon. 9/11 = Inside Job!

[roquefortfiles]

@Born2Flesh Oh.. i see. Well i guess the post crash photos i saw were completely staged then.  Didn't know missiles had seats on them!! Are you aware that a C130 pilot flying in the area at the time was asked by Air traffic control to look out for the plane. He did and followed it until it crashed in to the Pentagon. And he reported it as it happened. His interview is on Youtube. And witnesses had the plane go directly over their head. Not something one is going to... confuse.

[Born2Flesh]

..and witnesses said it was a missile...so what does your comment prove? ...not jack shit. ...and where in my comment did I say it was a missile? ...and you are full of shit, as I said before.

[NellJSmith]

@roquefortfiles Quote: "And witnesses had the plane go directly over their head. Not something one is going to... confuse."

Of course not. That's why at least 13 of them - funnily enough, many of them with the best and least obstructed views, with two of them being Pentagon police officers (obviously the sort of people who easily make mistakes about vitally important events) were so "confused" that they reported the plane approaching from the North instead of the South. How inconvenient of them!

[roquefortfiles]

@NellJSmith Oh yes!! Everyone and their dog are in on this. Where does it end with you people?? WHERE? I have seen the post crash photos of the Pentagon (and no they are not faked or some other location you can EASILY tell where you are) Anyone who knows anything about commercial aircraft can put a "Commercial aircraft" there. The most telling aspect is "BOEING GREEN" a primer paint ONLY used on commercial jets.. It is all over the place. And missiles don't have seats!!

[NellJSmith]

@roquefortfiles Did I say a plane did NOT hit the building? Sure it did, or else they'd have needed to fly it into the sea or something to get rid of it - hardly convenient, and too risky. No, my personal theory has always been (bearing in mind that the Pentagon's massively strong structure could easily withstand a plane impact almost unscathed) that a missile was ALSO fired, with split-second timing, creating the more impressive blast (NOT fire!) damage we see. The plane essentially evaporated.

[NellJSmith]

@roquefortfiles And as for ""Where it ends with 'us' people... it's at the point where the actual truth comes out, as the truth has an annoying habit of doing, no matter how carefully buried or disguised behind layer upon layer of lies, disinformation, fear and paranoia it may be. There should be NO controversial aspects to 9/11 if it were genuine - not the dozens of serious anomalies, on every level from basic physics to inexplicable (but very lucrative!) Stock Market insider trading. A set-up.

[roquefortfiles]

@NellJSmith Basic Physics??!! And what would that be? I am sorry i am not one of the people on Youtube who have a whole lot of difficulty with 911. I think it is pretty basic and cut and dried. And i don't require a commission to help me understand what happened that day. As far as the Pentagon goes... Missile along with a plane??? (WTF?) How does that work? A C 130 pilot was asked by ATC to follow the plane. He did and watched it hit the Pentagon reporting it live..

Missile??!!

[NellJSmith]

@roquefortfiles I don't really blame you, not wanting to believe your own Govt did/could do this (or at least allowed it - they're not clever enough to actually have DONE it - and no, that doesn't mean the Muslim "suspects" were in control either, whether or not they were also stooges). It's not a nice truth to have to face. But truth will out, sooner or later. Think your Govt wouldn't/couldn't do something like this? Here: wiki pedia. org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods (remove spaces). Think on.

[roquefortfiles]

@NellJSmith I am not American!! and the USA had plenty of warning 911 was coming. Stooges??  Every single one of the hijackers were confirmed and boarded the planes. Put through by customs guy who wanted to second guess his decision but did not (He is interviewed on line). Inside job?? For what. So Oil can go through the roof price wise..? Which it has. How does that serve the USA?

Sorry i don't buy in to this nonsense.

[NellJSmith]

@roquefortfiles Before I bore you to death, one more quote in my own defence (and, for what it's worth, ever since I saw the Twin Towers fall so neatly and impossibly symmetrically, on 9/11, live on the BBC, I have known it was staged SOMEHOW)... from the inimitable Sherlock Holmes: "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

Like it or not, it's the truth - wise indeed - and has formed the basis of MANY successful criminal prosecutions.

[roquefortfiles]

@NellJSmith I shot a controlled demolition for a tv news station. I shot the entire process. I stood two blocks away when the thing was set off. There is no way.. NO WAY!! anyone is going to confuse of miss those charges going off. I have been there!! ABC News shoots the WTC from across the street when it falls. We hear NOTHING as far as detonations are concerned. And not a SHRED of any CD material was found by TRAINED technicians in this.

Its more than a little ridiculous.

[drone8888]

@roquefortfiles Search a little harder. There are tons of documented accounts and recorded sounds of the explosions. As for materials found? The charges were placed on core beams, etc, in the foundry; aka where the Thermite reacted and turned everything to molten iron. So your argument is, why didn't they find cutter charge materials, when everything else was pulverized to dust, including people, but more like the passport found a few blocks away? I'm confused. :) please explain

[roquefortfiles]

@drone8888 Bullshit!! I have 6 excellent WTC videos running for almost 10 mins prior to collapse. Other than the random sounds of New York and voices on the street we hear not a peep from the towers. I would go so far as to say they are quiet even. Oh and BTW.. the tower does not fail at the core columns. It fails at the exterior wall which is entirely intact up to the point of collapse. So your thermite thing is a load of shit. Beams are not MELTED in .05 secs. Are u on crack?

[drone8888]

@roquefortfiles 6 Videos out of how many hundred? Link me a site where over 1200 architects and engineers are FOR the official story. Like I said, look a little harder...although, you may have things blocked in your neck of the woods, as I can't see a lot of stuff even though I'm in the US. Anyways, you can throw your guesses around, I'm sticking to the professionals and common sense. Also, I'd love to hear your WTC7 collapse theory...the 3rd building that fell in it's footprint due to fire LMAO

[drone8888]

@roquefortfiles ..Also, it was nano thermite...which apparently you're an expert on, so please, link me all info on thermite you can. Remember not to send me any data that scientists or professors who support 9/11 Truth worked on. It would appear that you have some sort of background knowledge, so please, duplicate the 3 miracles in a range of a few hours again for me. Obviously you have to know the chances of even just one building going down like that, so I'd like to see you redo it for me :)

[roquefortfiles]

@drone8888 Expert? No!! Just intelligent and smart and I am able to apply LOGIC and REASON. The chances of one building going down?? LOL!!!

Dude.. what were the chances of 1 let alone 2 commercial jets hitting the buildings that day?? I bet if you were on the 98th floor you probably thought you lost the lottery that day.

Oh and B7? Yeah.. the FDNY knew all about it. I have an entire article on that talking to the Chief. They knew all about its imminent collapse. Yawn.

[mayhemnmischief]

@roquefortfiles Article please?

[roquefortfiles]

@mayhemnmischief I am not your librarian. Look it up. Look up anything to do with Chief Dan Nigro and B 7. Or Frank Papila. Just two examples of people who were at this building all day. Saw its condition first hand. Both were standing close to it when it fell and nobody heard any detonations or charges going off. And no one even MENTIONED that at the time.. Why? Because everyone there KNEW it was coming down.

Only on YT do "Experts" not in attendance know more than people THERE.

[roquefortfiles]

@drone8888 I find that rather curious. Considering the core columns were still standing as the building was collapsing (go watch NOVAS how the towers fell. it shows them CLEARLY). And every single exterior column, which is where the building fails, is entirely intact to the moment of collapse. And i don't care how powerful your "THERMITE" is it is not cutting 14 inch BOX columns in .05 of a second. A welder could not do this job in 15 mins.

Who are you kidding?!!

[roquefortfiles]

@Born2Flesh Hate to rain on your parade. 98% of the plane was recovered along with most of the people on the plane and returned to their loved one's.

I think you are on crack dude!!

[Born2Flesh]

You can't bullshit me, I've done the research, and you my friend are full of shit. and there is no way in hell 98% of the plane was found. There are no seats from a huge passenger plane anywhere in the videos. You're nothing more than a fatass liar. ...No, it was your mother on crack when she sold ass to have you.

[NellJSmith]

@roquefortfiles It would certainly have been nice if at least ONE of the items you mentioned had appeared in the IMMEDIATELY post-impact photos, as opposed to what looks to me like a wide expanse of completely empty, wreckage-free, section of (undamaged) lawn leading up to the (not-yet-collapsed) Pentagon impact point... I take it you've never heard of the concept of planting evidence...? Maybe not.

[roquefortfiles]

@NellJSmith LOL.. (OMG!!) I suppose the tattered remains of shattered fuselage with AMERICAN AIRLINES is not enough for you?? I must have missed the guys with the flat bed trailer who pulled up quietly and spent an hour or so 'Dressing" the area with wreckage..

Would you like a link to post crash photos? How bout an interview with a fireman (you can't trust those guys!) who held a cockpit seat in his hands along with the front console.

Those evil firemen!!

[monkeygonetoheavensi]

@roquefortfiles you must of missed the guys with the trailer.......................­........were you actually sat on the lawn watching it happen dickhead ????? FUCK OFF i have seen the post crash photos shit mouth. Where are the engines???? were is the fuselage ???? oh it just melted into that tiny hole...like the one in your fucking shit brain. HEY PIECE OF SHIT>>>>SHOW US FILM OF A PLANE ACTUALLY HITTING THIS BUILDING

[roquefortfiles]

@monkeygonetoheavensi Shitmouth. (Who writes your material?) Use a little logic pinhead. So a fireman and paramedics are lying are they? For what reason? Paramedics find the black boxes. . (of which you can go and read the parameters yourself if you can read at the NTSB's FOI website). the fact they have the black box kind of screams... AIRPLANE!!! The firemen finds a cockpit chair attached to some flooring. The fuselage???? try a zillion pieces.

JFC ! Mensa is calling you.

[FYRFOX198]

I've watched the all 9 vids and the evidence is overwhelming. Unfortunately, we are up against something more powerful then you can imagine. Why do you think it was possible to cover this up. Can you imagine what it takes to pull something like this off. This doesn't even include the Twin Towers and Shanksville. You may think this is funny but it isn't.  The Evil behind this are an underground network of Powerful Satanist/Luciferians. They are Generational and as old as history. Beware...

[NellJSmith]

@FYRFOX198 I agree with pretty much of all that you say, except perhaps the part that the shadowy (but yes, unimaginably powerful and influential) people/organisation(s) behind all of this are Satanists - they're too clever to go around worshipping a pagan god, or probably anything else. They serve their own interests, and we are just pawns in their game - "we" being entire nation-states, never mind individuals. For them, no doubt, planning decades or even longer ahead is probably just routine.

[wllmdnldsn]

i'll tell u why they will not show us the plane attacking the pentagon it's not good to show the public footage of a plane hit 1 of Americas best defences being struck by a plane they couldn't stop it makes you doubt their securet system. I bet if they had shown a footage everyone wouldn't trust Americas securety.

[chh5555]

It seems there is one thing that your theory has not considered.... the administration/pentagon obviously lack the competence which would be necessary to execute the kind of operation that you are proposing.

[skrininow]

@chh5555 Maybe non stop preparation for this event would explain the lack of compitence of this administation. I can't help but to doubt the official story. Go outside of the United States and do some research. By the way where were you when it happened?

[chh5555]

@skrininow Sweden

[kshorting]

The analysis and interviews in this 9 part video are impelling. However, my wife and I saw security video of the plane hitting the Pentagon on that day. The video we saw is on YouTube at "NEW Exclusive-Flight 77 Crashing in to Pentagon,9/11 ". This video is either a fake, or Flight 77 did hit the Pentagon. You can see what appears to be the fuselage of the plane sticking out from the fireball. However, if this is indeed the fuselage, then why was it not found in front ot the building? Strange!

[chrisdunn421]

If the word "commission" is in the "Explanation process" Think opinion first. The Pentagon is a larger question mark than I thought...Man, before that wall fell, it is easy to conclude that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon.

[cutie101464]

what year did this happen i just heard about it today sorry about it i tend not to keep up the news cause i have school so

[shittttiuytutyoryt]

@cutie101464 oh relly this happend TEN YEARS AGO thats skrewed up how old are u this the biggest thing almost to happen to the usa!!!!!!!!!

[Sundogjeep]

If there is a real pilot among you, ask yourselves this...In what axis is the wing spar strongest? That's right girls, up and down. Now, since all of these type aircraft have swept wings, here's an experiment for you. Fold up a paper airplane with swept wings, cram it up each others asses, then see if your asshole gets bigger, or the wings fold back. Please get back to me. ROFLMAO

[NellJSmith]

@Sundogjeep I wouldn't advise you to try the same experiment at speeds of 300 mph plus, or else a visit to your local Casualty (A&E, whatever) Department would certainly be in order. Never seen a tomato fired through a sheet of steel at high enough velocity? F=MA. Laws of physics don't lie - although no, the plane alone wasn't enough to cause the damage seen to the immensely strong Pentagon's outer walls. Hence the necessary use of either explosives or a missile, I'd say. AND a plane, of course.

[roquefortfiles]

@NellJSmith A B25 flew through the exterior wall of the empire state building in 1945. One of the engines went through the other wall and on to the street. A B25 weighs 15 X less than a Boeing 767 and it was flying slowly, on landing approach.

A 767 weighs 450,000 pounds (15 x more than a B25) and was SCREAMING in at almost full throttle. if you even DOUBLE the speed the impact is QUADRUPLED.. not doubled.

Are you kidding me?

With EASE!!! 

[Sundogjeep]

What kind of pilots are you guys, Radio Control hobbyists? This is the dopiest piece of conjoured up crapola I have seen yet. This aircraft w as traveling between 530 and 580 mph, yet you show pics of aircraft debris from other crashes that occured on approach or during take-off. How very, very clever of you. As far as the impact hole in the building not being compatible with the wing and tail shape, please read on....

[Sundogjeep]

Here's another bit of misdirection this film offers....showing debris from airline crashes that occured while on approach or on takeoff. Try looking for large pieces of debris via the Turkish Air crash at Paris ( 530 mph ) or, better yet, where oh where are all of the large pieces of the two aircraft that hit the twin towers, or did Dick Cheney pick them up and hide them at a secret Halliburton warehouse.

[Sundogjeep]

ROFL. One of these days, you dopes will get laid, your acne will magically clear up and you'll move on to more important things, like your parents savings and is World of Warcraft based on a government coverup of medieval training exercises.

[chrisdunn421]

@Sundogjeep One day you will get the governments seed out of your mouth so you can speak the truth.ROFLROL Typical of most people like yourself, you dont explain anything. Explain: Why were the black boxes not recovered from ANY of the planes? For the 1st time in aviation history? Why are the 1st responders dying from inhaling the asbestos and not recieving help? Some of us cannot explain things, so we ask...and we get people like you with many insults and few facts, please adjust approach

[rubikscubepro3x3]

this video is amazing and yet theres still debunkers. its impossible to debunk this

[HalLindseyVideosPlus]

Keep up the great work

[Nickalispicalis]

What the hell happened to everyone that was a passenger on Flight 77. Were they taken off and executed somewhere ?

[eckyspondoolie]

Albert Stubblebine, a retired US Army Intelligence 2 star Major General says Pentagon was not hit by an airplane. Wake up USA.

[dryerjeremiah9898]

This is stupid the eye witnesses were to scared to know where the plane was. the freaking ran. no stoped and looked. i was at my uncles work when i saw the plane crash. you are stupid i saw thousands of derbis. ur are freaking gay. get a life. go to dc and look at the pentagon u ediot and youll see the new wall. and the was foundation damage u fat ediot.

[moonboy]

Weapons of MASS DECEPTION from the UNITED SNAKES OF america PentaCON BULL SHIT The plane Vaporized BULL SHIT............

[blackrule770]

black operation? why all bad thing is associate with black!

[666calculator]

The 911 attacks were planned and carried out by real terrorists but were detected early by our security agencies. But then they allowed it using it for the purpose of entering the middle east with a iron clad alibi. The demolition was done by American traitors for the purpose of cover up and for the increased support of the American people. Also as an alibi for the reason the flight recorders were never found.

[hoejgard]

911 was planned way in advance.

The alleged terrorists where nothing but scapegoats. The planes where likely flown by remote controls.

[666calculator]

Did all aspects of the government know? No they did not, did President Bush, I don't think so. Nevertheless enough did know to pull the strings to allow it to happen in order to begin accomplishing corrupt New World Order bankers goals. Lets not forget building #7, nothing touched that building excepts small debris and glass.

[KatKingz]

Let's see. The plane what so hot it evaporated, yet the grass does not have any burn marks. It was so hot that the papers that were blowing around did not even burn. Hummm...Maybe the plane is a magic plane, it can go through holes in walls smaller than the plane.

[wwwAgainstTheLawNet]

Check out the newspaper articles and images I just uploaded, Picture of the "Pentagon" with Cars and Trucks in front of where the plane was to have entered... also showing the torn down fence.... but it clearly shows the plane took out the BOTTOM, so how in the heck were the car and truck still parked within the lines ?

[krs306]

eyewitness flight 93

watch?v=-59kouBgO_s

all the pieces together thats what we need

if only i had my own tv channel

[wilderwun211]

I think he took more than 5 minutes to do his research. Why was there no melted  evidence of the planes? the whole width of the wreck was 63 ft wide .width of the plane is 120 ft wide . Hhhmmm. nah just a coincidence i guess. I know the rulers of the government protect all Americans. Must be true because thats what the media says. manspeed

[JoshMcRay]

*Facepalm* This video is horrible. There are DOZENS of pics of airplane debris of the plane that hit the pentagon if you take 5 fucking minutes to look them up. The reason why you don't see most of the plane is because the plane was 78% aluminum which melts at 800-1100 F depending on the alloy. The fires burned at 1800 F. Another dumb 9/11 twoofer documentary as usual.

[KameSenninKun]

Did you watch the 9 videos ?

Please do a video to contradict the entire thing, not only with a comment "hey yeah hell there are DOZENS of pics..." show them to us, a contradict all the witness with solid proof. Thank you.

[JoshMcRay]

I not going to do an entire video on what people can do themselves in 5 seconds. Go to google and look up "pictures of the plane that hit the pentagon", "pictures of plane wreckage" or " pictures of 9/11 pentagon plane crash" and go to the first couple websites. You can clearly see parts off the plane and the debris, but I have faith that you've already looked those up and thats why you believe what you do....o wait...you haven't...

[KameSenninKun]

Did you watch this entire video ? with cops witness etc ? do ... o wait... you haven't...

[JoshMcRay]

Yes , I have watched the entire thing. Again look up the pictures. I'm sure you have 5 mins to do a simple google search. I know how complicated that is for you twoofers to do that, but please try.

[BoomeR911104]

Steel melts at that temperature IF the temperature is held at that point. When airplane collides with a wall at that speed, the fuel explodes. I repeat again... EXPLODES! There is no continious source of keeping a fire at 1800 F in an explosion. Name me at least ONE aircraft disaster where 90% of its structure "melted away" or "incinerated" including its engines where fuel and air is burned at 1300 F. Don't be pathetic...

[JoshMcRay]

Yes, the fuel does explode. Not all of the fuel exploded though. Even in the WTC there was still about 30% of the fuel left (which is a lot considering an explosion). So there was a fire to melt the aluminum. "Including its engines" the engines didn't melt...The engines were not made of aluminum. Aluminum (depending on the alloy) melts between 800-1200 F. There are pictures of the 757 engines.

[KameSenninKun]

Ok, let's assume that you are right. Even if when you watch video from american TV, just after the crash, you see about nothing. And the debris TRULY not the point that scares me.

What about the approach that are different from the official version ?

[BoomeR911104]

The ONLY part that looked like an engine that was found of the 757 at the pentagon was an APU unit. However, General Electic did not confirm it was from 757. If the government has nothing to hide, then it should release all the video recordings. Again, I have seen hundreds of documented photographs of airplanes either hitting hills or just falling out of the sky with full tanks of fuel. There WERE tail parts, engines, landing gear fragments - none of them melted...

[JoshMcRay]

Lets assume i'm right? Look up the pictures you stupid piece of shit! I told you how to look them up on something as simple as google! Of course you don't see anything on the T.V. All the focus was on the damage to the pentagon.

[KameSenninKun]

Are you a bot or what ?

And yes, i looked over google, and i'm still not convinced at all about thoses pictures.

WHAT HAVE YOU TO SAY ABOUT THE DIFFERENT CONTRADICTIONS BETWEEN WITNESSES OF THE PLANE'S TRAJECTORY AND ITS OFFICIAL PATTERN ?

Come on, you can do it. You can stop focusing on debris, you can.

And after that, we will discuss about why the WTC7 collapsed.

Et toi aussi t'es qu'un ptit bout de caca mon gars xD

[KameSenninKun]

EVEN if a plane hit the pentagon ("oh yeah, we don't have trully a good video of that, that's just the pentagon you know, there were no camera you know... hmm... here.. take this animated gif..."), just explain the other evidences that make the officials conclusions impossible !!!

YOU CAN DO IT !!! :D

[KameSenninKun]

And you know, i really don't want all this to be true, that the US gov is lying to everybody... i REALLY hope that everything happened like official conclusion says...

But i can't say that for now, that's impossible with all those evidences...

This discussion is like :

- The earth is not the center of the... - Stfu MAN ! IT IS !!!

...

[JoshMcRay]

We don't have a video of the plane hitting the pentagon? Find the video and freeze frame it. You can see the plane in the bottom right. I don't know how easily you think low resolution cameras from 2001 could pick up planes going over 500 mph, but its there. "Just explain the other evidences that make the officials conclusions impossible" ok...go ahead hit me up. I'll be happy to do your research for you.

[KameSenninKun]

There is NO video about the crash. It's more a VERY BAD animated gif. And you DON'T SEE a plane...

Oh i forgot, in 2001, the pentagon was watched by ONE camera, badly oriented, and recording at about 2 frame per second.

Oh yeah 2001, C64, VIC21, 486DX266 ...

[BoomeR911104]

Wow, you're really ignorant aren't ya... First off, only ONE video, there is only one camera in pentagon, really? Second of all, metal doesn't just evaporate you sheep... The metal and other materials have to melt first in order to evaporate... Interesting how there were no liquified/melted metals in the pictures. Third, YOU google pictures of airplanes crashing even after take off or hitting hills (ex. Boeing crash in Greece in 2005). Are you an aircraft engineer?

[JoshMcRay]

You really are stupid you know that. The metal (aluminum) DID MELT!! Aluminum MELTS between 800-1200 F (depending on the alloy) The fires burned hotter than that you fucking moron. I've said that at least 3 times. So guess what they EVAPORATED! The reason why you don't see pics of the molten aluminum is because it EVAPORATED! Most pics were taken during clean up after it evaporated. The crash in Greece didn't crash into a building you moron you can't compare the two.

[observationman]

When aluminum alloys melts it liquifies, it doesn't evaporate. There would be molten aluminum left over. In fact, evaporating aluminum is next to impossible in an uncontrolled environment because it's properties make it seek out cooler areas while in a molten state so it will creep, like mercury, until it finds a cooler environment.

[observationman]

Regarding Greece, the comparison is valid because the plane smashed into a mountian yet multiple large pieces of the plane as well as bodies and luggage were recovered. They did not evaporate as did 4 (four!) planes on 9-11.

[BoomeR911104]

You seem to know exactly what 757 engines look like. Were they GE or Rolls Royce powerplants? ALL of the engine should've been found and I repeat ALL OF THE ENGINES!!! Not "small pieces of the engines." And no, lets not assume you're right, because you are wrong. You find me scientific evidence and prove me that 90% of a Boeing 757 can just disappear after a crash. Find me that evidence, then post something worthy of an argument.

[JoshMcRay]

"Can just disappear"? Why do you keep acting like molten aluminum can't evaporate when the fires were clearly hot enough?How is my argument wrong? Also when did I say "small pieces of the engines" I never said small. Please do yourself a favor and don't put words in my mouth.

[BoomeR911104]

OO I am truly sorry! Do you have any idea of how hot an open fire can get? Only about 1200-1300F at PERFECT CONDITIONS. Now I am sure you are a chemist and know at what temperature A) Aircraft aluminum melts and B) At what temperature it evaporates... If you did know you wouldn't be posting this stupid comment. Why dont you go out there and do tests on aircraft aluminum...

[BoomeR911104]

Also, why don't you freeze frame that video... Why is there no shadow underneath the "airplane" while there are shadows from every other object? AND the plane was NOT going at 500mph... Eye witnesses reported seeing plane for about 10-15 seconds. If you do the math, to cover that distance, the plane would have been moving at about 300-350mph.

[BoomeR911104]

"Depending on the alloy" Okay... you think the melting point of aircraft-grade aluminum is the minimum of those temperatures? Also by small pieces I meant you can go there and pick it up with your hands... THIS IS THE FIRST AIRLINE CRASH THAT DID NOT LEAVE ANY MAJOR AIRCRAFT PARTS!!!! This airplane DEFIED physical and chemical laws of simple science!!!

[NellJSmith]

@JoshMcRay 500 mph at ~ sea level? Equivalent to SUPERSONIC speeds at high altitude? Wow, Boeing certainly kept THAT quiet... why did anyone bother to travel on Concorde, at thousands of pounds a trip, when they only had to hop onto a cheapo 757 or 767 flight and enjoy the same sound-barrier-breaking experience, I wonder? Sheesh, please know what you are talking about. It helps. (Clue: It's related to air pressure and density at different altitudes.) Oh, and that's the oddest "plane" I ever saw.

[roquefortfiles]

@NellJSmith LOL.. A friend of mine flies a 767. I asked him all of these retarded questions that get thrown around on YT.. Its all a bunch nonsense perpetuated by people who have no fucking clue what they are talking about. But like to think they do. To paraphrase my friend..."No no no..i could fly the plane at full speed at 20 feet if i wanted to altitude has no bearing on the engines performance"..

BTW the speed of sound is 768 mph. : )

[monkeygonetoheavensi]

@roquefortfiles could your friend fly his jet through a hole that small too and leave no wreckage?? is it a mgic plane......listen to the witnesses on this series of videos and they tell you where the plane went. were you there cock muncher?? no you were not you stupid bastard??? how many hours of training did your arab friends have flying jumbo's at that height ha ha wake up shit for brains..YOU are not a pilot are you........oooh my friend says this oooooooh my friend says that.....fuck off

[roquefortfiles]

@monkeygonetoheavensi QUOTE!!!......

The remains of every flight 77 victim but one (a two-year-old) were recovered and positively identified by forensics experts. Personal effects of many survived the crash and fires and were returned to the victims' families. Articles on Pentagon disaster morgue operations and victim identification:

(end quote).. Use a little common sense fool. Do you think the families are going to sit still for NON identification? Fucking grow up you morons.

[JoshMcRay]

"You can stop focusing on the debris" You realize you challenged me about the lack of debris right? Thats how the entire conversation started right? Why wouldn't I focus on the debris when I've found many pics with evidence of debris and a plane. Also yes, I can explain why WTC 7 collapsed. Do you want to do that to little boy?

[KameSenninKun]

Oh yeah, talk dirty to me.That's why i hate human, they all HAVE to win. I really don't care if crazy arabs, your fuckin' gov or anyone did it. Just want truth.

Yeah ok, debris. The entire plane melt, and there are debris less than 1meter wide. Ok, as i said, let's assume you're right, i already saw thoses pics long time ago.

Why not focusing on debris ? Because this video is about THE APPROACH of the plane, compared to the OFFICIAL ONE.

[KameSenninKun]

How is this possible ? All actors ? Maybe, i don't know.

Really man, take each argument in this video, and take them down.

To do so, just find the cops in it.

And yes, you're gonna say WTC7 collapsed because of fire. In a perfect symmetrical way. There's even a 115 PDF of the NIST about it. I really want scientist to take a look on a report that took so much time to prove that, yes, it's the third building in history collapsing because of fire, and the sym is ok and normal.

[JoshMcRay]

I wouldn't know where to start with each argument. There are too many to just pick. Go ahead I want you to pick one and i'll answer back.

[KameSenninKun]

Yeah, just don't answer to the plane trajectory, that i'm asking for about 4 posts.

You're keeping open your mouth about debris, like it was the only weird thing in Pentagone attack and 9/11...

And yes, there are NO PICTURES, NO MOVIES of a plane hitting the pentagone. You can't say there are. And yeah, they cleaned right after the crash, that's wonderful man.

I won't answer again, you're too human.

Happy life.

[BoomeR911104]

And by the way, open air fire can only burn at 1200 F. You cannot achieve a higher temperature unless a special chamber is used. Argue if you want that 90% melted of the aircraft just "melted" and evaporated into a thing air. Ask any aircraft disaster investigator and he will tell you that more fragments should've been at the site.

[JoshMcRay]

*facepalm* Fragments were left! Examples include part of the tail, some of the planes lettering, the APU door, the wheel rim, the landing gear, pieces of the engine, a piece of the plane that came from the cockpit, and the disk hub for the engine just ot name a few. You realize the fire raged for hours right and thats why it "evaporated". I bet you also know that aluminium MELTS AT UNDER 1200 F. Of course the landing gears didn't melt. They weren't made of aluminium!

[CHANNELOMD]

pilotsfor911truth. org / core. html

this is the list of pilots who consider that no plane hit the Pentagon

[4dangler]

If you do not watch this documentary all the way through you are cutting yourself short of crucial witness accounts on what actually happened. Every chapter gets better and better, and chapter 7 must be seen to be believed. The best 9/11 truth documentary I have seen.

[KameSenninKun]

Better yeah.. in the scaryness...

Hope those thing won't be forgotten in school book of 23rd century...

if humanity is still there :(

[flanksteak1]

LOL

And that fact that this is the best and most accurate 911 Truth documentary says a lot about the 911 Truth movement.

LMAO!!

[UnitedFatesOfAmerica]

@4dangler

I agree. In addition, this documentary is a perfect example of how to do independent research. Now that most of the imagry and video availble on the Internet has been evaluated over and over, proactive interviews and investigations such as this are required to further 9/11 Truth. These first hand interviews with eyewitnesses lead to an amazing conclusion.

[losfyiz]

An incredibly thorough, unflinching look at the attack on the Pentagon. The best I've yet seen on the subject. Very well done.

[ComicPenius]

This video is not getting anywhere near the recognition that it deserves. These are the sort of videos that should be going viral.

[KameSenninKun]

too long to be viral, this should be resumed in a 1 min shot

[UnitedFatesOfAmerica]

@ComicPenius

Agreed! The taxi cab driver confession is quite stunning.

[vidmanx0]

@UnitedFatesOfAmerica Yeah, but why is this film ignored or even shunned by leading members of the 9/11 truth movement? What's so bad about CIT?

[vidmanx0]

@UnitedFatesOfAmerica I can understand why twin tower "no-planers" are derided because I've looked at their material and it's a total load of unscientific nonsense which appears to be a clear attempt at mis-info but this Pentagon film seems at least credible.

[NellJSmith]

@ComicPenius Absolutely. What a sad indictment of our brainwashed, brain-dead, "please-tell-me-what-matters-M­ighty_MSM" society it is that multiple millions viewed a badly filmed, grainy, crummy piece of soft-porn featuring the frankly unattractive Paris Hilton (and went to great lengths so to do!), whereas this radical piece of excellent investigative journalism manages only 11K or so view on YouTube. Wow, we really deserve to be treated as sheep - it's how we behave. Wake up, people! Wake up!

[AbiltyToThink]

This is a incredible well done video !!

[IAMRMC]

Except that it's not.